| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | What does r/MensRights think of this rape story?why would she have a safe word with someone that she hasn't arranged to play such a game with?!?! She wouldn't That doesn't mean you assume that "no" means "yes." | /r/MensRights | 26/09/13 10:05 PM |
| 0 | What does r/MensRights think of this rape story?What, she should give everyone who knows she's into this kind of thing her safe word? No, they should ask for it if she says "no". | /r/MensRights | 26/09/13 10:03 PM |
| 0 | What does r/MensRights think of this rape story?But that would effectively mean that she has no way to not consent, if someone knows that she has an interest in that kind of sex. By your logic, anyone that's heard that about her can just go and rape her. That's stupid. Safe word. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/13 09:07 AM |
| 2 | Rape LawsThe FBI's definition in the US does allow for a woman to rape a man, but only if she penetrates him in some way (so forcing vaginal sex on him would not be rape): The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. Until about a year ago, the definition did not include female rapists. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/13 04:34 AM |
| 3 | 'Blurred Lines' banned from campus bars at five UK universities - World NewsThe way you grab me Must wanna get nasty Notice how none of the people complaining ever mention these particular lyrics. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/13 04:30 AM |
| 1 | House votes to cut $4B a year from food stamps: "The bill also would end government waivers that have allowed able-bodied adults without dependents to receive food stamps indefinitely." (That would include men who have custody of kids but can't get the courts to recognize it)Yes, they could make cuts to military for instance. And not all these people need 8 vacation homes and shit. The people who profit from exploiting their employees. What is the point of surviving off the backs of people who you don't pay enough to support their own family? If your employees don't have kids, who will replace them when they die? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/13 08:58 PM |
| 1 | House votes to cut $4B a year from food stamps: "The bill also would end government waivers that have allowed able-bodied adults without dependents to receive food stamps indefinitely." (That would include men who have custody of kids but can't get the courts to recognize it)??? People smoke other people out all the time. Potheads are way less stingy than alcoholics. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/13 08:54 PM |
| 1 | House votes to cut $4B a year from food stamps: "The bill also would end government waivers that have allowed able-bodied adults without dependents to receive food stamps indefinitely." (That would include men who have custody of kids but can't get the courts to recognize it)for people who don't work Sometimes people don't work because the job doesn't exist. What are they supposed to do? Magically have enough capital to start their own business and be a "job creator" so they can create a job for themselves if the real "job creators" choose to not to? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/13 08:41 PM |
| 1 | House votes to cut $4B a year from food stamps: "The bill also would end government waivers that have allowed able-bodied adults without dependents to receive food stamps indefinitely." (That would include men who have custody of kids but can't get the courts to recognize it)i think if you're spending $100 a month on weed and getting $100 a month on food stamps, its fair enough to ask you to skip the weed and buy food instead So the fact that you test positive for weed, when it could have been in your system for a month, means that you spent $100 on weed? Someone else could have smoked them out. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/13 08:40 PM |
| 2 | Intersectionality and the increasingly obsolete theory of patriarchyI'm using intersectionality to justify that "every individual has the potential to be oppressed in a certain context." But you're wrong. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-5HWg7yiUXpQ/UfSsqGqSFJI/AAAAAAACN4M/3APN1r3fBAM/s1600/Matrix-of-Oppression.JPG This, for instance, would suggest that there are people who are immune to "oppression". The matrix of oppression, or the matrix of domination is one of the "key concepts" of Intersectionality. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality | /r/MensRights | 20/09/13 08:33 PM |
| 10 | Intersectionality and the increasingly obsolete theory of patriarchyThe only thing intersectionality does is ensure that a straight, cis, able-bodied, white man's problems should be ignored, and that a person like that's opinion never matters because privilege. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/13 04:24 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter