| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | The Good of Men [thetinmen]Why do idiots like you say a bunch of stupid shit and then act surprised when people downvote it? | /r/MensRights | 12/09/22 06:31 AM |
| 2 | Am I alone thinking this is not a convincing data sample?The people that believe this crap would consider a meth head in the street a credible source if his ramblings aligned with their political movement, and the media would call everyone who criticizes him a science denier. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/22 03:10 AM |
| 2 | Am I alone thinking this is not a convincing data sample?I assumed that when you asked about the quality of the "Data sample", you meant more broadly about the data as a whole rather than just the sample size specifically. The reason I brought up the source is because the Australian government can't be trusted to put forward correct and honest data in the first place, so the sample size doesn't really matter in the end because 100 or 100,000 are equally worthless when falsified. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/22 02:47 AM |
| 3 | Am I alone thinking this is not a convincing data sample?Why would I bother with the details when the source is already enough to strip it of any credibility whatsoever? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/22 02:03 AM |
| 10 | Am I alone thinking this is not a convincing data sample?The Australian government should be considered a credible source under no circumstances. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/22 02:00 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter