| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98 | GoT and shaming of men's sexuality | General | UnearthlyForce | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 02:42 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Yeah, I've heard it's pleasurable but also that it stretches out your ass permanently, like worse than when girls have normal anal sex That doesn't follow. Men don't need to stretch their ass more than women, nor is their anal elasticity lesser. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 01:33 PM |
| 0 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Male multiple orgasms require a radical departure from normal biological behaviour to consistently achieve So you're framing sex through penis in vagina and ejaculation as "normal" biological behavior, even though clitoral stimulation and time invested into it are required for women to reach multiple orgasms. You presume women could orgasm under the caveman conditions you're describing, in which sex lasted what, two minutes? and that's a very long shot. Then there is the shape of the human glans… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 03:15 AM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Yeah, fingers are enough. Look for dry orgasms, though. What worked for me was to stop contracting the pelvic muscles and focus on the sensation on the belly. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 02:43 AM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Womens multiple orgasms and time Not exclusive to women. Evolutionary psychology isn't the best tool for anything, much less this subject. If less than one third of women can have multiple orgasms and, by contrast, men are having more of them through awareness of their bodies, how is that explained by evolution and reproduction? The pattern is very inconsistent and based on common sense. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 02:21 AM |
| 5 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Through the prostate is easier, but yes. It requires practice and body awareness that men are taught to eschew. It's not a biological limitation, just how culture deals with men's bodies. But since women with such behavior as you mention are part of the reason male sexuality is so underexplored, it's no surprise there's little media on the subject. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 02:16 AM |
| 5 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Women are unaware that men can have multiple orgasms too, since them giving one is already seen as a huge labor compared to the supposed orgasm gap. Men's bodies seem instrumentalized in regards to sex, since they're seen as lucky to even have sex. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 01:13 AM |
| -2 | Men Don't Face Systemic Issues?Yes. However, those expose more directly capitalist mechanics, which need to be mantained at all costs by the powers that be. While women's gender role can be exploited and adapted for profit and moral guilt trip, men's cannot without criticizing the very productivity it relies on. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 03:49 AM |
| 2 | Why toxicity against men are so normalised?Because men need to tolerate degradation to prove they're harmless, since society views masculine bodies as more burdened by the Original Sin on a subconscious level - and I mean this regardless of its specific meaning in religion. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/25 10:22 PM |
| 1 | Is feminist gaslighting on the subject of misandry counterproductive?Problem is such mentality is stagnant and a disrespect to your very humanity. To naturalize gender bias as something immutable, rather than a purposeful social conditioning, is saying that, although you can see the limits of a system, you can't see beyond it. Humanity has gone through far more revolutions which rewrote your notions of natural several times across history, but apparently ionly gender bias against men is a dead end. Funny, huh? | /r/MensRights | 02/09/25 09:24 AM |
| -3 | How do you even engage on leftism as a man?What you call 'left' is still capitalist propaganda. It's just progressive and sanctimonious, but capitalist nevertheless. I suppose that, as an American, you don't consider revolutionary leftists as a thing, right? | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 08:10 AM |
| 1 | How do you even engage on leftism as a man?Also worth noticing that communist left-leaning men are not progressive and outright reject progressive agenda as equally harmful to men as reactionaries. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 07:57 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter