TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Unequivoco Archive

View 3 posts and 92 comments by Unequivoco on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I will not refer to myself as a feminist, nor will I refer to myself as a masculinist. I believe a movement called personist is what you seek in uniting people of various genders. It is interesting to note the spell check is not cool with the words masculinist, or personist. How do you create a subreddit?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:42 AM
4

I agree. A lot of people are bitter. Bitter women who are fighting for women by lambasting men. Bitter men who are fighting for men by lambasting women. A lot of the issue you bring up reminds me of African Americans. Most African Americans want the same opportunities as other races. A small and very local minority rail against the so called "white patriarchy". They march and make t shirts when a non African American kills an African American. They are all Trayvon Martin, apparently. "An affront…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:25 AM
22

Sigh. This person doesn't care about women, or anyone, but themselves imo. They are a troll. They have said so themselves. Move along.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:49 AM
1

yeah...
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:38 PM
4

They would ask why the bar is there.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:19 PM
3

A MRA helps men get equal treatment.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:12 PM
1

Feminists help women get equal treatment.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:11 PM
9

Instead of humanist, how about the less used personist. I have no problem with you asking questions. Just don't get too offended by some of the troll responses.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:50 PM
3

Generation Y women are a whole new ball game.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:42 PM
1

Feminism is a lot like Christianity in that there are a lot of different types. One person's feministic beliefs for say abortion access, is certainly not another person's feministic chauvinism. Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. Feminism isn't the problem. We will have a hard time fighting it. Instead we should focus on how a lot of feminist intellectual theory is just female chauvinism; if not outright female supremacy. There are feminists who advocate special programs for girls/wome…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:56 PM
1

Did you see history? I know what you mean, but it needn't be a false flag.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:48 AM
2

I mean interpretive.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:25 PM
-4

If power has nothing to do with being sexist; then why is it a bad thing? It can do nothing.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:23 PM
6

The law is goofy. His case is confounded by the fact that they were a couple. He also signed some document of paternity, he had not read. But yeah he had to pay child support. He was indentured to this woman for a time.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:04 AM
0

Ok, couple things "Victimisation by any form of predjudice doesn't have to be systematic to fall into one of the -ism catagories." I agree. You do know that words acquire new meanings, right? What do you mean by "esentially equal societal standings"? I think we are talking about a lot of different contexts. As a person and dealing with other people. As a person to society and its agencies. As a group to other groups. As a group to society. Am I missing any?
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:43 AM
3

You have earned my upvote.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:11 AM
0

Society through it's agencies and operatives can deny any individual. What makes the cases of prejudice so different is that a person without the characteristic would not be "oppressed". I would not be suspicious if I was a woman, say. I understand what you are trying to say in regards to a victimization, I think. I also think you think too deeply in regards to this. Let us have society reevaluate their prejudices in favor of women. They have been looking at their prejudices in favor of men for …
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:08 AM
0

Lol, you're right; I meant a bad -ism. Like when a person, or group of peopla are "oppressed" because of a characteristic; like race, sex, age, etc.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:42 AM
0

Well I'm for equality under the law. I'm for examining biases, and seeing how they may not be right. There is something to be said for allowing groups of people to be exclusive. I just don't know what yet.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:31 AM
-1

It is not sexist to kill a woman. It possibly misogynistic. An employer who refuses to hire any woman for a job is sexist.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:14 AM
1

Your right; it's called bogotry and prejudice.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:47 AM
-4

I think a lot of what is confusing people is the difference between prejudice and an -ism like racism, or sexism. There must be a power component for an -ism. Another thing that confuses people is the lack of a perception of one's privileges one would not think to use, or take for granted. We all know that men have used their prejudices about women against them while in positions of power. What a lot of people don't understand is the seemingly radical idea that women are in positions of power. I…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:35 AM
15

Some person says some conclusive qualifications in the first two paragraphs. This person then goes on to write many more paragraphs. I just wished she spent her time writing an article about the majority of MRAs. But she does posit this falsehood/sexism: "Of course, the legitimacy of any particular issue doesn’t legitimize men’s rights activism in general..." In the end I feel she is showing what I consider her female privilege.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 03:34 AM
7

Like seriously Paul Elam? We deserve better than this. He is not a dumb person. He should know better than to potentially waste every MRAs time because we have to defend against some sham interpretation of what I hope he's saying.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 03:01 AM
3

Thank you for posting this. Kind of. I don't follow his website. I mean, I could see how a woman was so messed up in her head to think of men as rapists and that to get a man she would need to be "asking for it", I guess? But in the end the whole scenario is a dumb conversation to be having. As I struggle to write more here. To explain how I feel. I just feel myself getting angrier.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:59 AM
2

I will bump your comment, because your words are true and you mentioned girlwriteswhat; who is awesome. My brain can't find the right words to express how I feel about what she has said; especially in her youtube video on the expendable male. Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:48 AM
3

Shame, manboobz is like the Señor Ben Chang to our internet pillow fight.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:24 AM
2

The only thing I would add to what you have said is that some men here are bitter towards women. But you don't need a mensrights subreddit to see that; just go to anywhere there are men talking honestly about how THEY**************************** feel about women. Then go and ask whites how they feel about blacks. Even better; go to a gender studies classroom at any college and ask what do the students/professor think of men.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:02 AM
1

That is sensible. Although there is this thing called downvoting. Most of the comments like that are negatively rated. Some people love to obfuscate the issues. Like yourself manboobz could have checked this site, been disgusted, and left. He could of been like me, and realized that underneath the excrement of trolls and some actual MRA women-haters that the MRM has a point in pointing out gender bias that is against men. But he didn't, he sanctimoniously rails against us, and our "evil words". …
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:57 AM
0

Does anyone here watch community?
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:38 AM
1

Ok so what do you mean by middle schoolers, and what do you find so unsurprising? Was it the lobbed generalized grenades of insults? Cuz let me tell you, your desk is over there with the other people who insult people.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:19 AM
1

Sad? Also I disagree with you saying "whole ideology would crumble under it's own weight", because getting rid of biases is a noble goal. I just find it too bad that a number of people who call themselves feminists are in actuality just female chauvinists.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:13 AM
2

I think I know where they came from, and it almost rhymes with Bandudez. Haha im so clever.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:04 AM
1

Maybe I'm wrong. The timing of female costs is coincidental. The piece has nothing to do whatsoever with a certain person argueing for coverage for her costs.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:28 PM
2

Your generalized opinion of a group of people is showing.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:23 PM
1

That may be true, but I sure can't wait to get my free male birth control bills.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:06 PM
0

I agree with your points.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:15 PM
2

My troll-dar may be malfunctioning. It didn't seem to go off when I read this.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 09:56 PM
1

Can we get free vasectomies? plox? How about tax payer funded viagra, prostitutes, penis pumps, or even sex swings? And I find it pretty sexist to say we as men doen't need hair removal, I mean we have more body hair. More free services for my gender plox. I can even itemize a list too.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 09:52 PM
3

Good point.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 09:05 PM
7

He isn't banned IMO, beacuse this isn't /srs, or /mens_rights.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 09:03 PM
7

In the words of Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, "It doesn't matter".
/r/MensRights09/04/12 09:01 PM
-4

Maybe the person is criticizing his weight so that he can change his dietary choices; which should give him a longer life. Much like how Manboobz criticizes us so that the MRM will have a longer life.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 08:51 PM
1

Oh I know. Some people are just misguided, though. Don Quixote and his windmills come to mind for some reason. Be careful when picking your targets for criticism. You wouldn't want to be a manboobz.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 08:01 PM
2

I agree, but who are you criticizing: the people doing the wrong, or a bunch of people including some innocent casualities you don't care about, because it's against your agenda?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:56 PM
-1

You shouldn't criticize women. A lot of innocents are thrown under the bus, and will get mad at you for being so hateful. Ask Manboobz, he should know what it's like when you throw a bunch of people you don't know under a bus.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:50 PM
4

That seems more apropos in the Mens_Rights subreddit. By the way, Manboobz will you be talking about false flag operations within the MRM? Or Not? Manboobz mandate?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:46 PM
0

I agree, but I don't think that's the intent of the article. It seemed decidedly partisan. I may be wrong though.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:36 PM
-2

If you took away the thousands and thousands and thousands and millions of Woman hating posts that are so evidently posted here, do you believe the MRM has any legitimate thing to say?(sarcasm, sorry if I wasn't clear before)
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:33 PM
1

I am sure it will be a well rounded and nuanced discussion. Will you be talking about the men who use events, like the one where you will be speaking at, to prey on woman? Have you come up with any clever names for those types of men? Or is your Manboobz mandate restricted to just identifying misogamy in the MRM?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:30 PM
0

It serves to demonize republican woman though. I believe that is their aim.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:20 PM
6

Any movement, where there is bitterness directed towards an "oppressor" is subject to that claim. The last comment in the screen capture is truth.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:10 PM
2

Apparently he's going to be educating these woman about some personality types he compiled. I didn't know there was a history of male feminist event speakers harassing/assaulting college women, though. Maybe he should give a name to those kinds of people. My idea would be to call them Manboobz.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:08 PM
4

Oh the white knight next to the condoms and lube. Trust him ladies. For realsies.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:23 PM
1

It is worth a shot.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:01 PM
6

You could claim you were taken advantage of. Most people wouldn't believe you, though. A woman who sleeps with a drunk man should be shamed as much as a man who sleeps with a drunk woman. Equality, it's a hellova concept.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:59 PM
1

Go toward the light, it shall comfort you; with your passing
/r/MensRights09/04/12 08:13 AM
1

You totes don't have to bow down to my e-cred. I am who is. It sux you couldn't be MRAisTheBesT. That would be more leegit
/r/MensRights09/04/12 08:02 AM
2

I know right? I mean whoever that person was should have known not to mess with best die like the rest with my internet epeen
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:37 AM
2

I will give you the play by play, good buddy So it opens on Sparta. With a shot of Gerard Butler as King Leonidas. You are prolly familar, right? Well at the end of the clip there is, no wai, a dub of Comic the Insult Comic Dog saying "FOR ME TO POOP ON!" synced with Gerard Butler as King Leonidas kicking the persian guy into the pit. It's really funny because his lips kind of match up. But tell me if you haven't seen 300, because I can tell you more about it brah, the movie is sweet.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:28 AM
2

Nah, you see what I enjoy is having a troll monkey dance for me. It generates more page views, and subs.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:24 AM
3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IobSRhjEcD0
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:14 AM
2

Your comments are great for me to internet poop on
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:59 AM
2

That would mean no one cares right?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:58 AM
9

I have recently joined/been watching this subreddit. I find no reason to call this place a cesspool. There is a huge troll infestation, though. I love eating trolls. With a nice bottle of chianti. Don't believe everything you read on the internet. Don't believe every one who is black is a criminal. Don't believe that every ____ is a __. Even if the first ___ is a reddit.com/r/mensrights redditor. Use those critical thinking skills, plox.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:48 AM
3

That's like asking a black person why they support equal rights while at the same time not supporting Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Jeremiah Wright, The Nation of Islam, Marcus Garvey, or the NBPP. It is an intellectual laziness to not distinguish.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:35 AM
7

Lol, Manbbobz sends cherry picked comments, and lumps everyone together. SPLC eats it up. They post that MRA groups are "troubling". MRAS are not a hate group. White knights and trolls want to suppress our voice, for whatever their reasons. The cause is just. It is distracting. It is all too comically reminiscent of the beginning of the 1st wave of the woman's rights movement over a 100 years ago. Yes, those women wanting those equalities that most of society(at the time) denied. Subject to heck…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:59 AM
2

I wish the best for this woman, and hope someone can help her.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:37 AM
0

Is this what 50 Shades of Grey is about? Sociopath, or psychopath? hmm, Idk. It is so hard to tell.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:02 AM
2

I was banned "Humor escapes you..." I replied with, And you brought it back to me, TYVM, lulz
/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:42 AM
1

The internet is like a box of chocolates.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:45 AM
1

You can be a dick to your dick by sticking your dick in crazy, but I don't advise it.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:12 AM
3

Good read. All things considered.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:02 AM
2

So this one time in band camp, this guy got on the elevator with me, and i thought he could have raped me. So I told off a general version of him in a blog. Other woman felt my pain, and they comforted me with their kindly bigotted words. All good now, I'm bitter and people on the internet know who I am, So I can get invited to show my pain at college campus gender clubs until I die. Rah Vagina! We are powerful, or maybe not; what day of the week is it?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 12:32 AM
0

I think they meant whore or creep.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 12:20 AM
6

I also agree; I'm no Male-colm X.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 12:12 AM
7

clown shoes
/r/MensRights08/04/12 02:47 PM
18

That whole subreddit might as well be called www.reddit.com/r/trollface. Have you looked at the description?
/r/MensRights08/04/12 02:47 PM
3

Steve has a problem with the the group sex/filming, though he concedes the video saved them. In the second video a man from the same college stands up, and defends them. Steve's stance is from the viewpoint that he wouldn't have been going back to this female's place. I can't blame him for thinking that. I think he does it to connect with the audence.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 01:50 AM
1

I liked this video.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 01:41 AM
5

We can never know how many rape allegations are true. Nor can we know how many rapists escape justice. I urge you all to keep your distance from women. There are a lot of crazy people out there. The law, and public opinion are slanted against you from the start. Do not become a statisic for the cause.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 01:26 AM
12

History is for studying events that happened in the past. Men's studies would be for how our culture demeans men; among other issues. I would use this video in a lecture called: Guilty; even after proven innocent.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 01:12 AM
9

The series of videos should be used in men's studies classes. It should be emphasized, and counted how many times Steve tells the audience that the woman recanted her story, because of her boyfriend. It is confounded by race of course. A story involving white males, like the Duke Lacrosse team, could be usefull in clearing up the issue.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:59 PM
-11

After reading I believe it's a stunt/troll.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:31 PM
1

Think of how Obama was elected. He had a tremedous turnout. I believe the impetus behind that is largely dimished. He now has the advantage from the standpoint of incumbency. The high level strategists of the democratic party are obviously concerned. They want to vivisect the country into their special interest groups, and then direct the frothing fractured masses to vote for Obama. Don't forget it was Democrat's Jim Crow laws. A rose by any other color is still a rose. And yes, they really do s…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 02:01 AM
2

Isn't that textbook Saul Alinsky?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:19 PM
115

I believe her remorse stems from the video, and not about the false allegation of rape.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:36 PM
0

Np, I respect your opinion of my analogy. But just consider it in terms of being amateurish, fooling people, and self aggrandizement.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 07:08 AM
1

I tend to try to stay away from generalizations. So I can't in good faith agree with what you say. I will say that as a newcomer to this movement, I was taken a back by a large number of generalized women hating that I have come across in different places, much like you'll find in the dirty corners of any movement. It is off message. But the group you are talking about is dead. The group this troll was "outing" is gaining momentum, and not going anywhere. Another failure in my analogy.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:47 AM
7

Really? I'm not that shocked.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:53 AM
1

I am a completely new redditor, and I totally agree with your principles. I believe it is the duty of a redditor to downvote. I will fulfill my duty.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:43 AM
2

A regular James O'Keefe. They seem pretty proud of themself. They are a troll. Er, I meant that they are a respected investigative journalist. Er, wait a minute I'm confused. All I know is some people are really into themselves, and bait other people. They are sociopaths who truly have no sense of other's feelings. This case is hilarious, for the irony.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter