TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Unexpected-bug Archive

View 1 post and 89 comments by Unexpected-bug on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Men's IQ variability is wider. While most women fall in the center of the distribution, men are over represented in both extremes (low and high IQs). Men in the beginning of the higher-end can't win when competing with men at the very extreme of the higher scores, but certainly they may win when competing with a person that is just above the average: https://www.aei.org/economics/greater-male-variability-its-a-fact-but-it-can-sometimes-be-deadly/
/r/MensRights19/08/23 12:14 AM
12

I fully support this idea. It could be a Telegram group to avoid American feminist censorship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/23 05:09 PM
37

They don't want to discuss this issue because this sheds light on a kind of violence where women are the primary perpetrators https://www.statista.com/statistics/418470/number-of-perpetrators-in-child-abuse-cases-in-the-us-by-sex/ As this don't fit the feminist narrative, they don't want to discuss it seriously (or when discussed is always biased by cherry picking and framing to make it into a male perpetrator/female victim issue)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/23 02:35 AM
-1

This.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:23 PM
1

Women's expectations in this thread: "This would take incels and low value men out of the dating market " Probable future: Tech expensive as hell that only high value men will be able to afford to avoid the dating market and the hassle and risk of a relationship, leaving only the men women don't want in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 12:28 AM
4

Hormones are an extremely important part of human behavior. You need to study at least the basics troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:18 AM
20

It's no secret to anyone that testosterone increases the likelihood of aggressiveness and risk taking behaviors, and it happens that men naturally produce a larger quantity of that hormone than women - that's the reason more men than women have those traits. With a good education that traits can be directed towards healthy and productive activities. That is basic Behavioral Endocrinology, not something related to being "inherently fucked in psyche", which is plainly an empty misandrist idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:12 PM
24

It is the exact opposite. Is a feminist sub disguised as a "men's issues" space, that in practice censors every discussion about any men's issue that doesn't fit feminist narrative, and also shape the discourse around every "acceptable" issue to be always pro-feminist agenda. In short, is a feminist false flag, every men needs to avoid it.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:34 AM
66

Soft? I think at this point in time we are seeing a very hard and direct eugenics apology discourse even in supposedly "not radical" feminists spaces.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/22 04:14 AM
9

There is no other way to solve this problem besides leading society to a more balanced dating scene in which both men and women have reasons to date on their respective leagues. For this to be possible, it's necessary to end any ideologies and policies that give privileges without responsibilities to any sex, and also to end any ideologies and policies that promote equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunities. By doing this, society will organically shift to a more balanced and healt…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 09:12 PM
14

Following that same logic, we can argue that r/antifeminists is helping "deradicalizing women" from toxic hate subs like r/feminism - double standards as always
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:44 PM
26

This is one of the reasons groups like r/antifeminists are growing every day. This is just a sample of the hateful ideas at the core of the feminist ideology,L.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/22 09:54 PM
30

This is great work, and it would be even better if along the phrases it included some statistics. Serious studies revealed that up to 50% of campus sexual assault allegations are unfounded, debunking the misleading low numbers often cited by feminist activists (for example, Susan Brownmiller made the unfounded claim that only 2% of sexual assault cases are false, to justify that there is no need for a fair due process). Also, it is important to see the big picture: According to the Center for Pr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/22 08:39 AM
16

Your list is mostly ok, except for MensLib. MensLib is a feminist false flag that pretends to discuss men's issues but in reality they only accept "discussions" that promote/reinforce the feminist agenda, excluding some of the most important discussions for men, and heavily censoring anything that questions any dogma of the feminist religion. If it wasn't fot that sub, I'll be happily up voting your post :)
/r/MensRights18/10/22 05:59 PM
64

I would consider myself to be a feminist, hold feminist/egalitarian beliefs, and think that increased diversity/equity is a good thing. Egalitarianism and feminism are different things. Feminism has been trying to hijack the "equality" or "egalitarian" label for years, up to a point many people still claim they are the same (like you are doing in your post), but they are completely opposite things. Feminism is an ideology based on the idea that women's struggles throughout history are more moral…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/22 09:44 PM
1

The biggest supporters and enforcers of hypergamy are men. Do you even know what hypergamy is? Hypergamy is practiced by the individual who is picking, and the pickier sex in humans is the female sex. Therefore women are the biggest enforcers of hypergamy in humans. Men as a whole are the ones who are agreeing to sleep with any women that passes their base level of attractiveness. There is no such a thing as an "agreement" between men about who they sleep or not, this behavior just emerged organ…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 10:29 PM
1

Correlation does not imply causation. Married men are also, in average, higher in status, education and wealth. Life satisfaction and health related issues are positively impacted by wealth and education, so, even single wealthy educated men have higher satisfaction and health than single poor men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 05:47 PM
10

This paragraph says a lot about how feminism is insensitive to its own current status No wonder some fall down the rabbit hole into angry online subcultures selling them a comforting myth about how someone else – feminists, immigrants or posh liberal elites – has robbed them of the status they feel they deserve. Why do feminists think they deserve the status they have? They don't realize that is actually feminism that is selling them lots of comforting myths? They don't recognize that feminism i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 12:33 PM
6

Currently, more or less 54% of youtube viewers are male vs 46% female (source) So, it's not like there is a massive imbalance. On the other hand, in USA TikTok female users outnumber male users at a 2:1 ratio, and also, globally TikTok has 60% of female users (source) .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/22 05:05 PM
77

Source: MenCare a camping led by two feminist organizations pretending they are "men". Just looking at the homepage of one of them stating that they want to "resist patriarchy" you know know that this is the same feminist ideologically biased BS we always see. Don't trust this false flag. Edit: If you want to see the source here it is - page 16 (Statista groupings/namings and graphs look re-worked)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 02:34 AM
1

Yes. And it is directly associated with the Coolidge effect, it has biological basis. You may want to read: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 08:15 PM
20

I completely disagree. It's time to rise our voice. No more silence. Enough is enough, it's time for men to publicly call out this misandrist biased farces. Men's silence is the reason we arrived at this extremes.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:52 PM
2

That's not true. "Patriarchy" is not "the way system configured over time" is the way feminists ideologues think about society based on their biases like selective perception and apex fallacy. This biased view is reinforced by the crafting of concepts biased in its inception that create narratives and collects data biased in the core definitions behind the methodologies. "Groups" aren't penalized, individuals are. The main problem of hiding behind the "group" narrative is that there are so many …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 11:59 AM
2

👆 This. 1% makes a oligarchy, not a "patriarchy".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 07:15 PM
2

Patriarchy is just a strawman. It's a dogma, an ideological vision. Everything rooted I'm dogmas and ideology is more like religion that like "science". Having this kind of concepts embedded into western academia is like medieval theology dictating the social norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 07:14 PM
16

I disagree with this assumptions. If this ideas don't have repercussions on real life, with real people, openly talking about it, hateful feminists and the masses engaged in their discouse will never see men's problems as a real issue. They will always treat everything regarding men's advocacy as "a group of anonymous misogynist incel trolls" talking to themselves. This ideas need to be publicly exposed, massively and with real people backing them. That requires courage? Yes. But the weight an i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/22 12:22 PM
4

More leftist men advocating for men's rights is a good thing. That means that men inside left-wing circles are going to (finanally) challenge the hateful feminist mob. Just to be clear, MensLib is left-wing but is not a real independent thinking advocating group, is just a false flag controlled by feminists to try to make it look like "more men are becoming feminists" and that "feminism is good for men". On the other hand, r/leftwingmaleadvocates is a true men's advocacy group that tackle real m…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:31 PM
3

Hmm... Ableism by considering "autism" a "characteristic" of the group you hate?... Discrimination: the third best friend of feminism (as the second is body shaming as shown in previous comments) Who's the pathetic joke now?
/r/MensRights16/06/22 09:20 PM
21

Peterson, Shapiro etc. are the most prominent MRAs and they are idiots They aren't MRAs. And at least Peterson is definitely not an idiot, I may risk to say that he even has an intelligence above the average. I don't agree with some of his ideas that are rooted on conservatism, but as there is no equivalent academics on the left, focusing on men and making their position public and mediatic, many men subscribe to the few academics that are somehow interested in understanding on the experience of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/22 05:07 PM
3

Just by looking at the wording of the article ans the keywords they used to classify the article ( Keywords Femmephobia, masculine privileging ) it's very clear that this is an ideologically loaded research. No ody is entitled to feel attracted to anyone, period. There are certain demographics that receive less attraction overall? Sure. But for example, take the very sizable chunk of men that are considered unattractive by majority of women (up to 80% according to some studies), when someone cit…
/r/Male_Studies06/06/22 12:37 PM
2

No. Patriarchy is just an ideological fantasy, molded thought a cherry-picked view of history and an interpretative bias of the selected bits that fit into the dogma. You cannot restore anything that didn't existed in the first place. But as always, you can create another fantasy as a completament to the first one, to make sense of your previous beliefs. That how religions work too, by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 12:30 PM
4

The fallacy of this article is that it only considers US viewers. Most revenue of world cup came from outside US viewers, and outside US, men's soccer is absolutely more viewed than women's soccer. Like massively.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 11:00 AM
19

White-knighting: Many men subscribe to misandrist ideas in order to get attention (or at least try to) from a (usually feminist) woman. The urges of white knights to be perceived as "desirable" or "virtuous" by (usually feminist) women, makes them replicate ideas based on inherently misandrist ideological terms like "patriarchy" or sexist biased concepts like "women are always victims, men are always perpetrators"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/22 06:28 PM
32

Patriarchy is an ideological fantasy (in the Zizekian way). Any conceptualization built around the strawman of an ideological fantasy is pure self-fulfillment expressed by the believers of that specific ideology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/22 04:35 AM
5

Women are approaching men, texting first on apps Do you have sources to backup this claim? Comparing data from many periods, is possible to see that this is not changing. Take, for example the famous 2015 Ok Cupid data and compare it to IFS 2022 study. Independent studies with different sources, in different places, across last decades show always mostly the same proportions (without significant change in time). It would be interesting to compare this data with the sources of your claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/22 04:11 AM
13

And we may include the fact that lots of "pro-life" women don't even express their opinions publicly because of the fear of being "canceled" and doxed by the hateful feminist mob. This is just another example on how feminism excludes and hates women who doesn't follow their dogmas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/22 11:05 PM
7

I don't get it. Why is this a "factoid"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 06:49 PM
2

This could be challenged by other sources/approaches https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2019/07/women-equally-more-competent
/r/Male_Studies04/05/22 03:15 AM
2

Because of the Spiral of Silence https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_of_silence
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/22 08:41 PM
5

You may want to challenge the concept itself. Like the famous discussion: feminist: Feminism is about equality Non-brainwashed Person: If the whole thing is about equality, then, why can't we use a neutral label like 'egalitarianism' and fight together for the issues and not the gendered agendas? feminist: Because, you know... patriarchy... historical opression.. that's why we need to focus on women Non-brainwashed: so, that proves is not about equality at all feminist (angry): Noooo! You misogy…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/22 08:27 PM
9

And it doesn't help either that there are some "male feminists" (or white knights that doesn't identify as feminists but in practice are the same) in the equation, that are profoundly misandrist and are used by female feminists as the "example" of the righteous men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/22 07:59 PM
1

As a man, I have experienced the same problem. As well as many other that commented here. This is not a gendered problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 05:20 PM
23

Yeah, menslib is a term hijacked by feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/22 05:14 PM
1

Read again. In what part of my text I'm saying there are no privileges in society? NONE. Both men a women have different privileges and disadvantages. Both of them. Patriarchy is just an ideological term coined to frame all women related disadvantages as being created by men, without acknowledging any of the privileges, as well as throw under the rug and make invisible all male disadvantages
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 11:09 PM
18

Left wing is only selectively "progressive" (only for certain groups) That pseudo-progressivism left mens issues out of their discussions (and also frame any womens issues as perpetrated by men or by the non-existent so-called "patriarchy" Leave someone out of the discussion, then blame it for the wrongs you see in society, and that's it. It won't be on your side
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 04:13 PM
6

That's true, but that doesn't eliminate the double-standard. Be mean in public with an ugly woman, you are canceled; be mean against an ugly man, everyone laughs and applaud.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 03:42 PM
18

But that doesn't matter for them or for their radfem government, because after all, men are expendable in their heads, and men suicide happens because of "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity". In the words of Chidera Eggerue, a know feminist: "If men are committing suicide because they can’t cry, how’s it my concern?" After she received some negative comments about this statement she also tweeted: “Men are murdering us and abusing children and you think I have time to theorise on why they can’t c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 09:14 PM
7

How in the world denying a false claim "shames" women?
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:21 AM
4

An unwanted pregnancy happens and the man doesn't want to assume the provider role: scum, you should assume your responsibility!... if you don't want children don't have sex... chit chit... do a vasectomy! Chit chit... wrap your penis... An unwanted pregnancy happens and the woman doesn't want to assume the provider role: go ahead girl, is your right to abort... or to have the children and get alimony from the man... or to do everything you want
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 08:42 PM
3

There are two absurd notions that need to be challenged: 1) That women are killed "because of their sex" just for "being women" 2) That because proportionally more killers are men, that makes less relevant the fact that the vast majority of victims are men (have anyone heard the classic "..yes, but that are men killing other men...") Both are completely ideological bullshit. The first, because there are motivations behind most murders (people killed "randomly" or selected by a single trait like …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 05:54 PM
4

.. women being somewhat more willing to censor controversial and potentially harmful ideas Well, but who defines what are "controversial and potentially harmful ideas"? I mean, feminism is undoubtedly controversial, and as we see everyday in male advocacy spaces, it also contains potentially harmful ideas. Yet, I don't see a lot of women trying to censor feminism. So maybe they are only more willing to censor ideas that are not biased in their favor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/22 10:44 PM
21

Because their concept of "inclusion" and "diversity" is just allowing certain groups while banning and censoring all others. No diversity of opinions, no diversity of ideologies is allowed - so, not real diversity at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/22 03:09 AM
–

If the other person cares about you, then you are not a SIMP. The whole thing with SIMPS is that they keep doing that with people who don't give a shit about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 03:36 AM
–

Take all my invisible awards OP. This comment says it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 03:31 AM
–

Exactly! many women fall in the Apex fallacy. and some comments in this thread shows it clearly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 03:20 AM
–

The great irony is that TRP creates men that work on themselves to be more attractive and can hold the correct frame to make them look "high value", so many FDS women are attracted to red pillers without knowing, and they are sure they're in the right track to get commitment or whatever they want, when in reality, red pillers are just holding the frame just the right amount of time to get what they want: sex. And after that, when FDS follower is dumped, she just try to rationalize that "he wasn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 03:14 AM
–

Comments like this are a good example of the empathy gap itself. Just a whole bunch of "rationalization" on why "is not wrong" and why as "men can make more damage" because physical strength everything is all right. And also, as always the classical claims 🙄 about "women have weaknesses that are exploited by men" (instead of recognizing women's agency and responsibility). As well as trying to play the "metrics" based on concepts biased on their core definitions (if we don't hear more about women…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 11:33 PM
–

"Equity" and "inclusion" are concepts that exist prior to feminism. Feminism just tries to appropriate that concepts in the discourse because it wants to make people believe feminism is equivalent to that terms, but in reality it is not. No matter how hard the ideologues try to spread their propaganda: feminism is not synonym of equality or equity or whatever. If someone wants to fight for equality the proper term for that is egalitarianism, not feminism. The study has interesting conclusions th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 11:14 PM
3

Good source here: https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 09:41 PM
16

Queens would have created a utopian society When someone tells you that, just show them the numbers. European queens were 27% more likely to wage wars than kings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 06:54 PM
11

Slide 7 One that welcomes diversity, but not diversity of ideas No, patriarchy theory and most modern instances of feminism are not open to objectively real diversity at all. That's for the simple reason that their definition of "diversity" already excludes anyone who doesn't fit within the narrative of "being an oppressed group", and that's a whole lot of people, maybe even more that the "accepted oppressed groups " they are open to accept. We need to stop reinforcing the idea that feminism or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 06:48 PM
3

Patriarchy is an ideological fantasy, not an objective reality. Most people in history didn't had any power, only a few bunch had, and of that tiny bunch it happened that most of them were men, them and the women in their circles had more power than 99% of all other men in history who were exploited by these elites, used as human weapons in their wars, being enslaved to work them to dead, or just by being held under their domain with laws to extract value from them. Patriarchy is just the apex f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 01:40 PM
19

Don't fall for Menslib is a feminist false flag. Real men's issues are censored there and also any content not aligned with feminist dogmas. Avoid it at all costs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 09:16 PM
1

For LTR, certainly. For casual dating any tactic that works is valid, as long as you don't get attached.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 01:23 PM
2

Not-so-fun fact: the most common sexual fetish of serial killers is transvestism
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:16 PM
120

Food is free in jail for woman too, so the only different "right" is to be sent to jail for a mere allegation.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:55 PM
6

"Scientifically" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 12:11 PM
7

If a prostitute is consenting the act, even if it is for the money, is not being raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 11:25 AM
20

The problem is that doctors rule what academy considers "true knowledge" and lots of that doctors are feminists, that are going to replicate their ideology until it passes to all academic levels and therefore, to society.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:18 PM
9

Most comments are saying dropping the production of the movie was a good thing. But I thinks is not: Netflix should have continued the production of the movie on this case in order to raise awareness on false accusations, the movie climax being the conviction overturn. They dropped the movie not because they wanted to "punish" the author, they dropped it because the story doesn't fit their narrative anymore and they didn't wanted to show how false accusations destroy the life of innocent men.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 11:35 AM
9

"80% of women stated that they have been confronted with the phenomenon of “manterrupting”" Most likely, 100% of men have been confronted with the phenomenon of womanterrupting
/r/MensRights01/12/21 11:25 AM
87

"Change the car oil, only you know how to do it" "I can't handle a drill, don't even know how to use it " "I'm not strong enough to mount the table, wood is heavy" "I didn't change the fuses because I don't know anything about electricity" "I thought you will be fixing that door issue, you know I don't know how it works" I've heard all of this things from women. Does feminists call that "weaponized incompetence" too? Don't fall for yet another misandrist catch phrase.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/21 10:53 AM
2

Meanings on dictionaries and books are not the same as actions associated to a word that may constitute new real life meanings for the observers. For example, there are lots of people who attribute a wildly different meaning to "feminism" when compared to the dictionary meaning. More people than you think don't believe feminism is actually about equality, no matter how hard that "meaning" is lobbied into mainstream outlets and academy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 03:27 PM
3

The problem with this semantic games is how they could be weaponized against innocent people and the impossibility to actually track, prove and demonstrate most cases. Yes, of course cases like described are offenses that should be punished, but even if the punish is the same it is good to have separate labels for different scenarios, because this gives context. Otherwise we'll be only feeding the ever expanding definition of 'rape' without any real benefit to anyone (if everything is called 'ra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/21 12:58 PM
9

What???? Feminism is the prime example of an ideology: "Ideologies are ideas whose purpose is not epistemic, but political. Thus an ideology exists to confirm a certain political viewpoint, serve the interests of certain people, or to perform a functional role in relation to social, economic, political and legal institutions. " https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/law-ideology/#LibeConcIdeo
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 06:54 PM
7

This is one of that truths that people seems to deny for their own comfort. This is an historical struggle, but at this specific time, 3th/4th wave feminism is one of the main drivers of the current state of affairs, as it is a moralistic force that is pushing to the realms of state and law immaterial things and ideas that otherwise would belong to the "personal" dating strategies sphere, with the objective of giving all the advantage and privilege on sexual matters solely to women by limiting a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/21 11:52 AM
2

The problem is that if you discuss this with feminists, radical ones are going to label you as an enemy that is trying to find a way to judge women behavior and moderates will "agree" with you on the surface, while still practicing and promoting the same shitty system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/21 03:44 AM
1

I would rather advocate for the "Egalitarianism" label. There is no sense in advocating at the same time for two labels that have some mutually exclusive dogmas (that are never accepted in the discourse but that actually exist in reality). Until we can unite both sexes under the same label we'll be only creating bubbles instead of negotiating a common moral framework and we'll be only advocating for a tribe, instead of advocating for issues. This seems to be really hard to do right now, but we n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 04:39 PM
11

Men have been betrayed by feminism Is more like: Several men were not well informed in the past and believed in the rethoric that describes feminism as a synonym of equality, even though it never was a fact it was only rethoric all this time. It's more like discovering you were scammed than like being betrayed by a friend, let's say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 04:09 PM
3

I don't buy into explanations based on critical constructivism ("everything is socially construced" as the main factor) because they understate the importance of biology. Evolution of sexual behavior (see: behavioral endocrinology) preceeded the modeling of any social script. In other words if girls are taught only a few boys are ok or women tell each other that having sex with men who aren't worthy cheapens them is because society molded that messages on the basis of precedent behaviors and obs…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 01:24 AM
23

I've told this to a woman that argued that streets are more dangerous for women. I got to the point in which I showed her the murder rate statistics and she just dropped the classic: "yhea, but that is men killing other men...." and walked away. In other words: she doesn't care that men are the main victims of murder she thinks the gender of the murder is more significant (even though the vast majority of men are not murderers or anything close to that). I don't care who is representing danger f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/21 01:09 PM
4

I wouldn't want a world where my daughter could easily go into sex work and paid well You are framing everything only through the women's perspective and loosing the whole picture. If sex work is well paid is because of the huge imbalance in dating. If sex was an easy thing to get for men, sex work will immediately loose it's appeal, there wouldn't be enough demand and sex wouldn't be a valuable asset to be sold. So there are only two ways for lowering the value of sex work and both are almost i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 09:37 PM
7

They moreso see it as another means by which men can control females through financial manipulation There are several problems with this assertion. 1) Where is the agency of the people who willingly choose this lifestyle? 2) In a regulated scenario (excluding criminal exploitation) the offer comes first: an individual chooses to engage in sex work first, it is not the possible client who pushes someone in specific into sex work (because that would be a crime) so, in this case, the one who is pur…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 04:39 PM
12

Thats true, and low self esteem usually is fueled by things like continuous rejection, zero social structures supporting male specific issues, and so on...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 11:52 AM
2

Thanks for the information. Already reported https://www.instagram.com/good_guys_guide for hate speech. Hope they get enough reports to ban this misandrist profile .
/r/MensRights07/05/21 12:41 PM
3

What? "Incel" and "PUA" are not even movements, they are only denominations some people use to define specific visions. This would be the same as saying that feminism is composed by the "femcel" and the "misandrist" movements. This article has been deliberately edited to be a hit piece to MRM, we urgently need an army of Wikipedia editors and an army of content creators. This is insane and out of control.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 02:06 PM
1

Maybe you may like r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 01:53 PM
1

Sadly, this is 100% real :/
/r/MensRights12/04/21 04:36 PM
13

This is not only a thing that is happening internally within organizations. There is an actual orchestrated initiative sponsored by the UN to police speech, even when talking to bots. Take a look at this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mozy5u/united_nations_is_now_fighting_against_harassment/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/21 10:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter