TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Unfourgiven Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by Unfourgiven on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

lol, I found his attempts amusing so I responded in between apex games. I wouldn't call that much of a time commitment.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 05:11 AM
2

If you want to shoot your shot then a message to them instead of someone that doesn't know them probably works better. I get it you are out of practice. Hostility and copy paste isn't the route I'd recommend though.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 12:29 AM
2

You've been the one messaging me my man.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 12:19 AM
1

man the desperation, how long has it been since a woman talked to you by choice lol.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 12:11 AM
3

My point exactly
/r/MensRights01/03/21 12:01 AM
3

still missing the point, the issue was illusion going off on a random for no reason. besides you arent prepared to mediate a debate. hard pass
/r/MensRights28/02/21 11:54 PM
3

ironic that I need to stfu because I wasn't involved and have her defend herself and yet you are pushing your way in... You chose the side of someone raving over a single word, you lose take the down votes and move along
/r/MensRights28/02/21 11:47 PM
4

Your contributions are so intellectually stimulating, how do you do it?
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:36 PM
4

This seems to be the part that's going over your head... My comment wasn't about her my comment was about illustrious and how we shouldn't be attacking people without merit. For that you don't focus on the person being attacked you focus on the attacker. You don't ask mugging victims to defend their actions you ask the aggressive party. I would have thought this was common sense. Basically, Hey turbo maybe hold back and wait to lash out until it's deserved. There are plenty of psychos on the oth…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:30 PM
3

Wow you really showed me
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:16 PM
3

Lol, my girl knows I judge situations based on merits and not genitals. Generally speaking that means I side with the men's rights movement because we are often treated unfairly and that needs to change. That doesn't mean I side with every psycho out to get his pound of flesh anytime he hears the word feminism and jumps to his own conclusions. Just like I can condemn male psychos and rapists and still support mrm so can a woman oppose radical feminists psychos and still support feminism. edit: s…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:12 PM
7

Don't need her to, I've got my own girl but thanks for the concern. Some of your other posts are reasonable and have good points. This one was unjustified. I assume it touched a nerve so hopefully you can get some closure and get that under control. Automatically jumping to white knight when someone disagrees with you also isn't a good look. It's possible to think you are acting like a psycho and making guys look bad without being a simp.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:02 PM
4

White knight? Stopping people from making the movement look like a bunch of psychos that are just as bad as the radical feminists isn't white knighting. Asking for evidence before condemning someone based on their genitals or leaping to conclusions is common sense. How far gone are you if you think his post was a justified response?
/r/MensRights28/02/21 09:32 PM
7

While what you are saying might be true you haven't provided any evidence that it is. Here you have someone claiming to have seen their error and claims to be trying to improve and your response is basically to say whatever you can never get better you will always be shit. You're the toxic one right now and all its doing is making you look bitter and small and making other women less likely to try and improve because they see someone like you saying they never can. Unless you know this person or…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 08:30 PM
5

This is the part most people seem to be completely missing. Its not child porn unless you can prove that it sexualized the child. The description of the video doesn't lead it to be cp so the only argument is where/how she posted it. If all her other content is 100% porn then sounds guilty. However, if she posts a mix of normal stuff also she could argue that it was meant to be normal also.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/20 09:12 PM
2

So women are being raped but men aren't being killed? The "joke" with kill all men never seemed to be that the woman was personally going to start killing men. Instead the "joke" seemed to be that as a society we should kill all men. That makes your hyper focus on only counting women who personally kill a man seem a bit odd. There are plenty of shitty men and women. Denying any comparison between the 2 and pretending like only the enemy team is bad is just silly.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 07:03 PM
1

I agree that the full blown anti-male members will always be the minority. And I also know that most of the #KillAllMen don't actually mean it. But there are still some that do. I also know that if people started using #RapeAllWomen it wouldn't matter what kind of satire or hyperbole was intended. There wouldn't be lots of people going well he didn't mean you, he just meant the bad ones. It would be social suicide to anyone but the most radical of anti-women.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 05:42 PM
5

Many feminists arent anti-men, that would be very true. Yet you specifically said the radical feminists? The most extreme of #killallmen arent anti-men? This seems highly unlikely.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 02:22 AM
1

Yes, because that is what I said in my posts... I'll leave you with this. If you make decisions based entirely on race that is racist behavior. That behavior will also cloud your judgment in relation to other peoples motives. If your first reaction when someone is hurt by the cops is to check and see what race the cop or the perp is then you are being racist. If you only publicise and stand up for the victim when they are the same race as you, thats racist. There are many other motives and unles…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 10:46 AM
7

And yet they make up more than 50% of the murder and robbery statistics. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/tables/table-43 If you want to quantify things there will always be someone that quantifies them differently to prove the other side. Your point is a valid argument to show that black people per capita are more likely to be killed by police. The opposing view will likely be that black people are significantly more likely to murder and thats why the cops are "t…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 09:51 AM
3

A basic Google search turns up https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/ So far this year there have been 172 white, 88 black, 57 hispanic, 14 other, and 98 unknown. Police brutality is an issue that affects all races and arguing over which group is impacted more distorts that issue.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 09:17 AM
5

Except that there is plenty of evidence of the same stuff happening to all races. When the police kill a white man its police brutality but when they kill a black man its systemic racism... Why can't fighting against police brutality as a society be enough without groups getting into a victim dick measuring contest to make sure everyone knows they have it the worst?
/r/MensRights29/06/20 08:56 AM
19

That would be fine if those rights were defended across the board.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 08:51 AM
1

Oh this is not in regards to just private insurance. the https://www.healthcare.gov/coverage/birth-control-benefits/ states that: Plans in the Health Insurance Marketplace must cover contraceptive methods and counseling for all women, as prescribed by a health care provider. Plans must cover these services without charging a copayment or coinsurance when provided by an in-network provider — even if you haven’t met your deductible. FDA-approved contraceptive methods prescribed by a woman’s doctor…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 11:25 PM
8

obtuse because I want equality? All I said was make the same services available to protect both parties how is that being obtuse. If you would like obtuse then yes women do have to carry the child and that comes with costs and risks. It isn't all bad though because they always know when they had a child and they always know it's really theirs. The baby making system is mostly to the cost of women but you can't claim that here are no disadvantages to men. That is both accurate and obtuse.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 05:03 PM
10

I am fine with that if you also cover mens. The argument that women shouldn't have to rely on men to be responsible and need their own birth control applies just as much when reversed. If birth control or contraceptives are available it needs to be to both. Many insurance companies cover getting your tubes tied but won't cover a vasectomy. All I ask for is equal coverage. If we do both that's fine and if we do neither I can handle that too.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:55 PM
27

This wasn't bitching about women. It was bitching about the late wave feminists that are doing everything they can to hurt men. While there are plenty of assholes around here the majority are still pushing for equality for both men and women, which is something feminism isn't doing. An example would be the push to help lower suicide rates in men by giving it attention and funding. I haven't seen anyone say take the funding from women, they say add funding for men too as we are more affected. Mea…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter