| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Guys who go to the gym are pussiesSo you choose to ignore the main fact woman have equal rights as men and instead delve deeper into the semantics of your "heels is sexism" point even though I did not dispute it. Im surprised you took time to type out a response since you failed to be bothered to register any of the points I made. Have you asked any of the women who are in the office why they still choose to wear heels despite no longer being forced to wear a symbol of their enslavement to men? (FYI heels aren't just for good lo… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/04/17 10:18 PM |
| 19 | Guys who go to the gym are pussiesSubtle sexism is quite different than equal rights. You are also implying there is no subtle sexism towards men. Are men required to wear ties in the office? Id rather not have to list the numerous other examples where men are the victims of your subtle sexism in society. Women have equal rights. There will always be things we can improve upon in our society women and men alike. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/04/17 06:58 PM |
| 0 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.Women dont become dry due to lack of foreskin man thats just not true. If you are so desensitized what makes you think extra skin would change that? Couldnt your foreskin be just as desensitized? Its not some magical piece of skin that would solve all life's problems. Majority of nerves are in the helmet, its like the girls version of the clitoris. Foreskin is like the hood. Its not a game changer. Im sorry you have issues and id like to see you find a way to be happier. I dont think blaming bei… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 06:54 AM |
| -1 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.None of that is true. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 06:20 AM |
| 0 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.Huh? Then how doesnt it work fine? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 05:51 AM |
| -4 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.Properly circumcised penises work fine. My apologies for being confusing. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 04:21 AM |
| -5 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.Hahahaha | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 01:23 AM |
| -5 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.It isnt a potential insult. It is one. In the comment i was referring to OP called a cut man stupid and unable to comprehend something due to his condition. By definition something that is not intact doesnt function. It's derogatory. Our circumcised penises work fine. What do you mean by trigger me? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 01:11 AM |
| -1 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.Sensitivity varies greatly from one person to another and more or less nerve endings doesnt mean better or worse sexual experience. Would you suggest humans should calibrate our sexual organs so we all share identical experiences? Lets all get our nerves counted! Oh and a standard genitalia size for all! Come on, give the guy some real support. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 12:29 AM |
| 2 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.Huh? | /r/MensRights | 12/03/17 11:57 PM |
| -2 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.Am I missing details? Was your circumcision done improperly? If not you are certainly not missing out on "a lot" of sensitivity. There are also humans who have little sensitivity naturally. Maybe talk to someone about these feelings you have. Id like to see every man (and woman) be proud of what they have even if its different. We definitely shouldnt be shaming anyone for they way their privates function. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/17 11:19 PM |
| -4 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.OP is on a holy quest to save the "intact" penis. Completely oblivious that the term "intact" is implying circumcised boys are somehow broken or not fully men. Seems pretty odd to me that a woman who has such a disgust for so many men is receiving praise in a men's rights sub. We get that there is an issue about child abuse but we can do without the vendetta against cut boys. Use information to combat this issue, dont spew hate at people who didnt have a choice in how they ended up. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/17 10:18 PM |
| 3 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.So you agree that circumcised men are inherently stupid while commenting in a men's rights subreddit on a post victimizing boys who were abused at birth by being circumcised. Get a grip dude. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/17 09:49 PM |
| -1 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.I think thats pretty obvious. I just dont want cut people thinking they are somehow less preferred or missing out because all they see here are remorseful comments. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/17 09:38 PM |
| -5 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.I understand you are passionate about the topic of child mutilation but i do not appreciate this rude, spiteful, insulting comment. Nothing the user you replied to said justifies that kind of response. I am sorry never mind me i am just another cut idiot who is less educated because of the way my penis is. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/17 08:30 PM |
| -6 | The Guardian: Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation.I have only received compliments for how mine looks and cant fathom a different sensitivity. I am quite happy. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/17 08:19 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter