TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UnholyDemigod Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by UnholyDemigod on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Gender is the oppressive stereotypes and expectations places on people because of their sex. You are thinking of gender roles, like girls wearing pink, men fixing cars, shit like that. You get heterosexual males claiming both womanhood and lesbianism. And then shaming, berating, and belittling lesbian women who don't want to have a male a sexual partner. Those people are understood to be fuckheads, and not to be listened to.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/21 02:02 PM
-1

Gender and sex are now seen as different things. Your sex is your biological makeup, as characterised by your chromosomes. You get a Y chromosome, you're a fella. 2 Xs? You're a chick. Your gender is the sex that your brain thinks you are. You wake in the morning and expect to see a cock between your legs, and there is one? You're fine. You expect to see one, and there isn't? That's called gender dysphoria, and that's what transgender people have. The currently only accepted treatment is accepta…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/21 10:43 AM
1

I've never used tinder, but wouldn't a fishing selfie be a way of showing a personal interest? Or are you only supposed to to put on photos that make people wanna fuck you?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/20 05:27 AM
6

So fucking what? The same statement happens all the time on reddit in porn subs. Also, if someone say a 14 year old girls breasts are huge... Is that objectifying? Not really sure why you chose the boobs of a 14 year old. You could easily choose someone like Salma Hayek, who actually does have massive tits. Am I objectifying her by saying that? If so, I guess it's objectifying to say she has long hair too
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 12:13 PM
7

Simply saying a dick is big is not objectifying, it's simply stating a fact. If she said she wanted it inside her because it's big, then yes. But she just said it's huge. There's nothing sexual about her statement.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 11:39 AM
5

What married couple doesn't pool income?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 08:42 AM
6

That's not what happens if you break a contract. They would've sued the shit out of her.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 04:01 AM
2

Beyonce was up for best original song. Joaquin won for best actor. In what fucking world is that the same award?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/20 01:16 PM
10

While I agree with you, what he said is how Eratosthenes calculated the circumference of the Earth. Although with a bit more to it than just "do maths"
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/19 09:03 AM
7

But you don't understand, she had to match the speed. Everyone else is breaking the law, that means she has to as well. For some reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/19 10:00 PM
2

No
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/19 04:20 AM
-11

Slaps, not punches. Considerable difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 05:44 PM
-24

That is retaliation, not self defence
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 04:22 PM
-3

Triggered is a word kids use when faced with people with different opinions. "I didn't say something stupid, you're just T R I G G E R E D"
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/17 05:25 AM
1

Jesus fuck what a bitch. Why does she hate you so much?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 11:25 PM
1

It's a hard question I know, but: are you a cunt? Can you honestly say you were dicked out of custody? Or is your ex just a total bitch?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:33 PM
-34

Did you want to have sex when you were 14? Cos I bloody well know I certainly did, and that chick is hot as fuck. I woulda given my left nut to get up in that at that age
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:04 PM
-2

Aw, boohoo, you might have to actually work hard for a living. Are you worried about breaking a nail? Jesus Christ mate, if retarded feminists wanna bitch because they don't earn as much as men when they actually do, let them. If you don't wanna work in the mines, don't. Fucken sook.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:46 AM
1

Kind of like that wage gap, eh? The one that doesn't really exist? I see. If people present falsehoods to argue in favour of women, perhaps we should start doing the same to argue in favour of men, is that what you're saying?
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:44 AM
-13

Some of these don't make sense to me. 'Relative length of sentence - 100 v 163'. 163 what? Days, months, years? 'Chance of incarceration - 100 v 200'. 200 what, percent? Or that it says there's more male loggers, coal miners and construction workers. So? That's choice you idiot, nobody's forcing you into that. It's not like homicide victims, or child custody battles.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:50 PM
2

Substitute them for trades then. How many women do you see doing carpentry, or boiler making, or stone masonry?
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:14 PM
1

And those things also get removed
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:41 PM
1

It was removed because that single sentence is not enough evidence to support the title. Not even remotely close. But I suppose that doesn't support your agenda, so we'll just pretend it does
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:32 PM
-1

More like it does't fall within the rules. The second link, about male victims getting arrested? The source has this to back up the claim: Other men reported being ridiculed by the police or being incorrectly arrested as the primary aggressor And that is it. Now do you see why it was removed?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:42 AM
2

You try modding a default then see what you think of the userbase
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:26 PM
1

Again, it seems the only reason you even bother saying "well it breaks rule 3" is because the average askredditer is a fucking moron who has to be told to elaborate. That's pretty much exactly why the rule exists; because they are fucking morons. And we can't edit posts, only remove them
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:19 PM
1

With only a title, yes, it's straightforward (although it breaks rule 3 and would still get removed), but with my original comment I said that he put forth his thoughts in the text box in a way that was deemed soapboxing
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:07 PM
1

I don't mean it like that, I mean he's offering forward his thoughts and asking people to agree with them
/r/MensRights10/11/13 07:58 PM
2

Whether or not a statement is true means absolutely dick. If you have an agenda behind your post it gets removed, that's what soap boxing is. We're /r/AskReddit, not /r/tellreddit. He basically said "this is my opinion, who agrees with me?"
/r/MensRights10/11/13 07:55 PM
2

AR mod here. Because it was removed, and because /u/JustinIsFunny has decided not to reveal all the context, here's what was in the post body: Men don't currently have any say in whether or not a woman has a baby, so if they don't want a child, should they be allowed to opt out of parenthood. Including all financial obligations? Taking that into account, his post most definitely had an opinion behind it. Even if it didn't, it broke another rule as well.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 01:05 PM
2

I've been banned. And it won't do any good if they think men can't be discriminated against. Or, more accurately, refuse to think that.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:58 AM
2

Dammit. *give much of a shit
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter