TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UninformedDownVoter Archive

View 0 posts and 159 comments by UninformedDownVoter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That's evo psych mumbo jumbo. Show me a peer-reviewed paper that indicates that is correct. If your hypothesis is true, why then aren't all people who were brutalized throughout history leading comic circuits? Women comics usually aren't funny simply because they play up their role as women rather than just being funny. Women are still seen as eternal victims. For instance, if a man makes a joke about getting beat up it may be funny, but a woman will never make this type of joke. People would be…
/r/MensRights09/02/16 05:59 AM
5

Right there with you brother. It's like we have to grow up twice.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 10:21 PM
0

He provides no proof for an idiotic argument, and I get attacked? lol
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:49 AM
-5

Proof?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:14 PM
-30

You sound like the type of guy to also wear tin-foil hats and home school his kids in "survival strategy" and Gaaawwwwddd. Anti-intellectual nonsense you're spouting.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:13 PM
1

You didn't capitalize some of your sentences. You obviously went to a government school! - this sums your pathetic argument.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:26 PM
1

Nah, just on mobile. But keep up your class elitism; you're time will come.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:26 PM
0

Some public schools are excellent. They generally have better finding due to idiotic local property tax funding methods.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:30 AM
1

Education has many positive externalities. If a person cannot pay for good education for their children, it should be provided for, either through vouchers or public schooling. There are many options. If you think a child should be damned because their parent can't or is too selfish to pay for their education, then I don't know how to help your poor reasoning skills.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:24 AM
1

Cops fucking suck. Their institution is one I have seen first hand turn some of my friends and family into racist assholes. But to say they are all racist is a stretch.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:37 AM
1

Here here comrade.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:32 AM
1

Lol, they banned me, a self proclaimed Marxian socialist, because I comment here occasionally. They aren't socialists, their a bunch of whiny liberals who haven't read past chapter 2 of Capital.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:31 AM
2

Social skills are a form of intelligence. The quicker we can get away from "math=intelligence" the faster we can stop nonsense education cuts and inflated egos.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:46 AM
3

You're an outlier but I agree with the general sentiment.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:44 AM
1

I'm no anarchist (maybe I'm one of those "goddamned communists" or whatever), but you have offered no critique of anarchist ideology. Your post was one long ad hominem, with out defining anarchism, without defining empathy, without defining anything for that matter.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:26 PM
-3

Wow, terrible conspiracy theory much? It's like looking into the eye of Alex Jones; smart enough to know something isn't right, yet too stupid to actually see the problem.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:12 PM
1

Yeah, sounds like if any of these countries collapse they would be fertile ground for a rise of fascism.
/r/PussyPass30/12/14 01:41 PM
1

So the few men within the past 10,000 years of human history where large harems were generally possible Have had such a huge impact that we are now a harem-making species? We are an adaptive species. We have variated our diet, our shelter building, and our mating strategies. I think that men most likely do have less selective sexual selection practices, yet I do not see this as having such a significant impact seeing as we have primarily been a single-mate species.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:52 PM
1

Software piracy: if a product is infinitely replicable, then the value of each unit infinitely approaches zero.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:21 PM
1

Sorry I misinterpreted! Good point on police.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:54 PM
1

And those other men in the hunter-gatherer band? I guess they just accepted not mating and died out? I'm not saying you are necessarily wrong, the theory holds merit, it's just that our evolutionary history is only occupied by calorie-abundant, farmer societies where one man could command factions of other men and have a multitude of wives for an insignificant fraction of the time.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:43 PM
1

That your idiot statements make me laugh? L-O-L dude, el oh el.
/r/PussyPass29/07/14 05:44 PM
3

Who was talking about lethal force? Lol, more pussies who want to kill people because they get their asses beat.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:39 PM
1

You are dumb dude lol.
/r/PussyPass29/07/14 01:30 PM
1

Racism is a subset of prejudicial thinking you smooth-brained fool. Fucking troglodyte.
/r/PussyPass28/07/14 03:59 PM
-2

What are you on about? I guess political correctness now means people can't go around saying thinly veiled racist tripe without getting corrected. Fucking pathetic.
/r/PussyPass28/07/14 11:15 AM
-1

It's been trending more and more on every online forum I frequent. More and more racist filth are showing their scum heads.
/r/PussyPass28/07/14 03:22 AM
1

I made no thesis. I was just criticizing the studies. I like that you immediately assume that I have some thesis born of your mind. Good day sir.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:37 AM
1

I am playing no games; this is an unrepresentative sample. I'm not saying women are lying. I am saying that you cannot separate causation into biological (nature) and sociological (nurture) with these flawed studies. If you choose to believe something without proof, then go ahead. I choose to follow scientific reason.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:05 PM
1

I find a self-reporting, online survey from the BBC to be only of relevance to the social group they studied, a very specific one at that. You can't generalize the findings at all, as we have a culture that rewards men who have multiple partners. It would be like doing a study of African Americans' professional preferences, finding that more of them work low income, manual jobs on average than the population mean, then concluding African Americans have a genetic predisposition for this work. It'…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:05 PM
1

But we are a social species that has to care for completely helpless young for a number of years. It seems strange that females would have less sex drive if that means that males would be more likely look for other mates if their sexual needs are not being met. Unless we were living for the majority of our history with less males on average than females in our clan groups, but wouldn't this be offset by the amount of females that die due to childbirth and related problems?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:23 PM
2

What other reason would men and women evolve psychological predispositions towards sex if not in response to each other and their offspring?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:02 AM
2

I'm bit saying you are wrong, but reading those sources, it appears that the cross-cultural one mainly relied on studies that focused on western college students and a BBC online survey (hardly evidence for biological differences) when looking at sex drive, as opposed to "socio sexuality." Parental Investment Theory to me holds logical strength, but it also stands to reason that even if women are not as biologically predetermined to high socio sexuality, they would have an interest in providing …
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:18 AM
2

Do you have any links to studies that examine the "horniness" of men and women across different cultures, including matriarchal and hunter-gatherer cultures? Because most of the ones I've heard about say that women aren't as horny as men but it is pretty damn close, but these studies were only studying western white women who are, as is known, in a particular social category that places them at high sexual value. This could have the same psychological impact on sexual attitudes as being food sec…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:10 PM
1

I do not say that evolutionary psychology is invalid; I merely grow tired of redditards who think they can explain every behavioral quirk in terms of some evolutionary cause. While we can say, yes, all behavior is the result of evolution, when we are studying why specific behaviors manifest in specific environments saying "evolution" becomes completely meaningless because ALL behavior is predicated by evolution (as you stated). It's like asking why one population usually "flees" in stressful tim…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:33 PM
1

Would one study the differences in behavior of the exact same biological species over a relatively short time period using biology? Of course you could use it in some way to establish that these two study groups are, in fact, the same biologically and therefore need no more biological study to explain differences between them. I suppose if you were an evo psych hack that you would say that our biology has changed so much over this time period to constitute not just a behavioral change (nurture) …
/r/MensRights23/07/14 09:29 PM
2

Not saying you guys are wrong, but one needs biology to make a cursory examination of historical stereotypes of gender?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:22 AM
1

Although that made me laugh, he is talking about a tight vagina to be compared to a large penis. Neither of these can be changed ATM and constitute the major points of sexual pleasure, to a certain extent (I will be the first to admit that the mind plays a huge role, but it is not the organ doing the deed).
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:18 AM
1

What? That is the Marxist theory of class struggle. It already has a name. When I hear "cultural Marxism" it's always some garbage to do with the oppression of women and gays, which are NOT classes in Marxian analysis. It is just more made up crap (like the majority of their ideology) from libertarians and the philistines of the right, unsophisticated and barren in its explanatory power.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:26 PM
1

Lost me at "cultural marxist," which is an entirely nonsensical and, frankly, fucking stupid concept from people who understand nothing of Marxism or Marxian analysis.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:57 PM
0

Are you sheltered or just dumb? We are born as some of the most helpless babies in the animal kingdom and develop at relatively slow rates because of our large brains. Therefore, much of our brain development happens outside of the womb and is extremely subject to societal incentives and pressures that can have life-long effects on thinking patterns. Are you truly expecting children of either sex or gender to "use her voice, her agency, to tell her parents that she wants to work on experiments, …
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:55 PM
2

This is wholly retarded. Why are video game tournaments gendered in the first place? The only reason real sports are gendered is because there are REAL physical differences between the sexes that give advantages to mostly men (women do have advantages in flexibility). This is not the case with games.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:18 PM
8

Is this some kind of issue? There should be no gendered e-sport tournament; this is retarded.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:09 PM
15

Are you kidding me man? Women get less time in prison but black people get more. Fucking shit, the white pride bull shit leaks too much into this part of reddit.
/r/PussyPass27/06/14 03:12 AM
1

How do you define "talent and experience?" If you judge purely based on the current paradigm of what constitutes these in modern business, then you will exclude many black people who may be able to rise to the challenge (such as a kid in a shit school who outperforms his peers yet falls below average kids in a private, white school). This is the point of affirmative action; it addresses, very crudely, the qualitative differences in the education and "culture," as you say, that present themselves…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 06:16 PM
1

So you are saying that, for example, a black man who went to a shit ghetto school and managed to be one of the best in his class (yet around average in terms of testing compared to some private school white kid), gets a leg up with affirmative action and goes to a good university, then seeks to enter the development field helping the areas where he grew up would have no more value in the office than someone without intimate knowledge of inner city psychology? This subreddit, in its anger at femi…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:26 PM
6

Nerf robot arms!
/r/PussyPass16/06/14 03:23 AM
1

Oooooooollllllllddddddd
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 02:40 AM
-2

Nah bro! Don't bring up race here now, this here is a white man's subreddit! Racism doesn't exist because I saw a black dude get hired at my firm! ONE black dude! Can you believe the affirmative action?!!?
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 02:38 AM
1

So you prefer passive-aggressive steaming then outbursts of rude "STFUs"?...... that doesn't sound like a manner of interaction that promotes logical discussion.
/r/PussyPass03/06/14 03:33 PM
2

I agree with you that some men will tend to "mansplain" things to women who, due to social conditioning, simply do not display the type of confident body language that implies competence. This is something LWRellim mentioned, but I think he goes overboard in ignoring how human behavior works (as is evidenced by his over confidence in the truth of the opinions of his godlike IT people and disdain for "people-centered" fields and "education majors"). LWRrellim makes good points, but seems to carry…
/r/PussyPass03/06/14 03:26 PM
0

HAHAHA! /r/communism is a pathetic Stalinist shithole.
/r/PussyPass02/06/14 09:07 PM
1

A sad story all around.
/r/PussyPass02/06/14 03:57 PM
0

I would prefer fighting physically against bad odds than social ostracism and psychological attacks, but that is just me.
/r/PussyPass02/06/14 03:51 PM
1

His comments are so vile to the point I can only laugh at them as parody (at least I hope they are!). But, there is a point in saying that porn is only good in a very specific sense: it lowers sex crimes in a population (if the studies are accurate) only in a society that already has a large disparity between people wanting sex and sex being offered. I would postulate that this is a function of systemic sexism that punishes average (in the bell curve sense of the middle 68%) man more harshly tha…
/r/PussyPass02/06/14 03:43 PM
7

"Feed your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you! Good, gooooood, I can feel your anger. Take your weapon, strike me down and your journey towards the jail cell shall be complete!"
/r/PussyPass02/06/14 03:05 PM
2

Sexist fucker, get that anti-intellectual shit out of here.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:39 AM
2

Except it doesn't? What fucking nonsense. I'm mixed and feel that stuff very acutely, and I rarely see any interracial dating in entertainment in America (bbc programs I have watched seem to be much more egalitarian). Anyways, why would you fight against depicting interracial couples unless you are a raging racist?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:05 PM
-1

Comparing feminism to the KKK... You do realize feminists are not trying to suppress men through violence and terror. At most their theories are sorely outdated, but only the most insane person would hate men to such an extent. In that case I would say mental illness is what caused them to latch onto ideology disconnected to reality and not the parent theory's intrinsic logic.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:55 PM
0

Agreed. The brute whose mind cannot escape the past can only think of sexual "worth" or "value" as being validated on number of sexual partners, when this is only a biological fact when there is no birth control. Multiple children is what brings burden onto a male and especially onto the male with no biological parental connection with the child. We have transcended this, modern medicine and birth control allow us to have fun without the consequences, and I say go at it! We don't deny the social…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:14 AM
1

Yes, very good point. I meant more in terms of one's mental state which should then lead to what you said. We are agreed. Any discrimination serves only to harm all but a tiny minority of individuals. Look how powerful men gain off of sexism while the rest of us suffer.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:58 PM
2

But I feel, as a Black man, that there are many experiences that white men can't empathically understand that affect us. They can be sympathetic and that is all one can ask. But I do find myself pissed off at the "system" even though no one person controls it. Is that not what political action is about?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:24 PM
2

I know when I get mad I get much more philosophical and wordy when I speak.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:00 PM
2

Male pride? Sounds strange. Even if it is just a name and the group is all jolly and for equality, it brings to mind disturbing images of white pride groups. Like race, we should take no pride in the sex we were born with, because we did nothing to earn it. Have pride in your accomplishments, not what's between your legs.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:33 PM
42

Never thought of it that way. Enlightening, thanks comrade!
/r/MensRights13/02/14 06:00 PM
1

It doesn't matter. Black cops are often more brutal than white cops. It about how you perceive a group, not necessarily about how you perceive yourself. This is something white people in the US have a hard time understanding this, because to them, those who haven't experienced any racism, try to understand it on a purely intellectual level. So, many will think in very simplistic terms, ie "you are black so you must always be out to help black people!" In the US, we must live in the world of whit…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 07:42 PM
7

Liberals may not be quite the bright light of logic they claim to be, but goddamn are they better than reactionary conservatives that dominate the right in the US.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 02:23 AM
1

Shouldn't funny jokes relate to reality?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:50 PM
-7

Yes, more STEM chauvinism from reddit, my oh my, what a surprise. It would make one think that politics and history play no role in the way human beings interact. It would, if one were to lack perspective due to offhanded dismissals of the social sciences.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 11:37 PM
-5

Cultural Marxism? Are you kidding me lol. How fucking right wing and stupid can you get?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:40 PM
4

Yeah, because in the latter case the accused are swiftly taken to jail. No one cares when a black man commits a crime because its 'just what us black men do!' (/s) But when a white man allegedly does something, it is seen as abnormal, and the accused are attacked in the media because 'they were good boys, raised in good homes! If they this they must be the most psychopathic of the psychopaths!' (/s)
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:16 PM
4

The main host can be sensationalist, but he is a very astute political analyst most of the time. In terms of gender, Ana the cohost is probably the most reasonable lady there is, as the main host tends to flaunt chauvinism.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:59 AM
26

It actually is in many Islamic and other backwards areas of the world. But not in the first world... Her points are asinine without distinction.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:44 PM
1

Of course there is no absolute reality in the context of judging to precise causes behind historical events. We can, at this point, only generalize and draw conclusions there from. What you seem to be trying to do is astonish with complicated language (a favorite of philosophers when trying to denounce any real world action, a strategy in which all actions can indeed be denounced as "morally impermissible"). I claim no eternal hold on truth and never claim that Marx or Marxism does. It is a subj…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:56 PM
0

Marxism says nothing on free speech. Perhaps you have too many polisci 101 books on Stalinism.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:31 PM
6

Exactly. I currently live in Central America on a very limited income. I am male, speak with an American accent, so when I go out to potentially dangerous places (certain bars or any dark street) I take limited cash and always keep my smart phone closely guarded. Would I like to carry my stuff openly and maybe chat with friends on the phone while I'm walking at night? Yes. Would I like to walk without fear? Yes. Would it be my fault if I were to be robbed? No. But there are bad people in this wo…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 09:58 PM
0

You haven't read Marx at all. He states over and over and over that capitalism (capital) is a process. It is merely value in motion in a particular manner. But even things made up in the minds of man have real effects on thought processes and physical actions that follow. Before you talk about Marx, suggest you actually read his works and not base all of your mistaken beliefs on what your undergrad Econ professor tells you.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:06 PM
6

Do you fucks even know what Marxism is? Have you ever read anything written by Marx?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:57 PM
0

Please stop throwing around the word "Marxist" like you even know what Marxism is.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:54 PM
1

Third trimester abortions are illegal: ie when one would consider the transformation from fetus to "baby" to have occurred.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 01:50 AM
1

Yeah, hating on this poster is just insane. It's saying for men to get into healthy relationships. If anything, I would say the poster could be criticized for not telling everyone to teach their children, regardless of gender, to promote healthy relationship...
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:48 PM
1

Don't say that here! The market is God and only prostrating yourself before the capitalist priests and their accountant emissaries will save you soul!
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:04 PM
0

Or perhaps the business could have another trained employee able to pick up the slack? Oh but that might cut into big boss person's yacht fund! Can't have that. Gotta keep those luxuries for the wealthy rolling, no time for proper child rearing.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:01 PM
1

Are you implying that proper child rearing isn't a worthy societal investment and that the labor there so used to realize its implementation isn't deserving of payment? The nonpayment of child care is a classic case of the shifting of economic externalities, from private capital onto the public dole.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:53 PM
-4

No, we are not "hard wired" to find physical fitness attractive per say. Many cultures now and past find fat people (women especially) to be most attractive. Stop saying bullshit as if modern American BEHAVIOR is representative of general human NATURE. It pervades reddit and society in general all too much.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:25 PM
4

I was saying during the Steubenville uproar that it isn't that rapists are applauded or some shit like everyone was saying. No! It is an insipid toxic culture of high school sports hero worship that was the real problem. The fuckers can almost get away with anything because they play sports well.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 04:33 PM
0

More Ayn Randian garbage on reddit? A community can "feel" when you take the average of the individuals within that community feel. Just as "my community built a garden." Yes, individuals built the garden, but the individuals create a community. Are we really upvoting failures to understand singular nouns that encompass more than one unit?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:43 AM
2

I think I understand. Thank you for the measured response. I do appreciate a good discussion.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:19 AM
2

Agreed, but smart is not always synonymous with successful in our day. In many fields, and the realm of spreading your genes, being able to bluff and lie without guilt are much more indicative of success. This could be argued to be a form of intelligence (which I largely agree with multiple intelligence theory, although including sociopathy may be a stretch). "Smart" is such an amorphous term, and linking the two can perpetuate prejudiced against people born into negative social situations, like…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:02 PM
1

Im not defending hover hands, that shit is hilarious and dumb. But your strange hate of men watching anime does nothing to change perspectives on make gender roles. Judging by your use of language, I guess you are just one the fool bros who like to think they are big men by putting down others. Your kind is laughable.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:29 AM
1

Nice to see that you are contributing to men's rights by demonizing men who like to watch anime instead of reality shows (or what ever visual entertainment you want). Really good man... Really good...
/r/MensRights10/06/13 01:11 AM
2

I know what you mean man. I was raised by my single mom. I did have my grandpa and uncles but they never really talked about women with me when I grew up, so all the actual socialization I had dealing with girls while I was a kid was as you describe. It took me until college to realize that women aren't attracted to what they say they like and even longer to begin to change my behavior. My mom is the nicest woman in the world but she kept dating losers until both her children were grown. Now she…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 12:44 AM
7

There are real oppressed and ruling classes, but gender is far from the dividing line.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:28 AM
4

I believe in MRM and I am a self-declared Marxist. Your point is?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:23 PM
13

This is reddit man. Anything not STEM is just filth to be wiped from the bottom of your academic boot.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:20 PM
1

People are individuals yes, but this does not obfuscate the fact that things happen to certain groups more than others. You are trying very hard to equivocate; why don't you just say you are against all discrimination and not equate all as having the same effects?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:58 AM
1

What do you think the chance a black person will be your manager and deny you a job because you are white as opposed to the opposite? You must not hang around black people much. I am half white and half black, I hang with both, and I see the negative stereotypes that have been internalized by black people. It is a common theme in many inter-black dialogues, and many blacks are harder on themselves than any white people are.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:18 AM
-3

No. That bias against the oppressing group IS different than bias against the oppressed group. To equate negative ideas on whiteness, such as they can't dance or are whatever, may make a person feel bad but it doesn't generally limit their life aspirations. While negative ideas about blacks, lazy, cheap, thieves, etc, CAN limit life aspirations. The problem is there is a difference between gender discrimination and racial discrimination, in that the former cannot be generational and latter can. …
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:39 PM
8

I explain the difference above. Anarchist are not Marxists, nor vis versa. We have the same end goals but radically differing theories on how to get there. Anarchists are generally utopians and angry middle class students in my experience.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:15 PM
1

Anarchism is a belief in a certain political economic system. It is akin to communism in the fact that we have more or less the same end goals (lack of state, highly advanced society where scarcity of basic needs is gone, collective worker-owned enterprises form the economic and political base, individual freedom and connectivity greatly expanded, etc). Communists believe that there needs to be an evolutionary progress towards this society after an initial revolution for class power. While anarc…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:13 PM
1

Yeah, NBPP, NOI, and many black Israelite groups are a gaggle of loons.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:15 PM
4

It should be caveated that calling someone a Nazi doesn't necessarily end a discussion. If we are talking about real threats of a profession towards fascism, then Nazi comparisons may be valid (which I believe is in accord with Godwin's law). But we have gotten to the point in general discussion that even this is taken as invalid even when it may be correct. Essentially, any mention of Nazism in analyzing modern phenomena is considered an appeal to emotion, even if that is not the intent and the…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:16 PM
4

Comparing the original black panthers to the kkk is just nonsense. They weren't for racial supremacism. Although the new black panther party could be legitimately described as fascist and supremacist like the kkk.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 08:52 PM
1

Thank you kind sir.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:17 AM
1

My god? What the fuck are you talking about? I believe in nothing as foolish as a god and I equate no man (except maybe Anderson silva in relation to MMA) as a god. Good thing my mom got food stamps when my dad ran out before I was born, because I may have been afflicted a mental deficit akin to your own.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:13 AM
2

Yeah, it's nonsense. There are certain biological realities that the law must take into account. Blanket equality doesn't exist in the realm of reproduction.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:17 PM
3

Investing in healthy children who of no fault of their own live in shitty home environments isn't supporting "parasitic" behavior. Now, you can argue that the government isn't being effective in doing this (I make no claims in this discussion), but you are being very short sited based on your blanket statement. Your language harkens to a fascistic nature that characterizes American "conservatives" (read: reactionaries). This kind of stuff is the crap that people can point to to make MRm seem lik…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:49 PM
1

What was the debate? And also, your family history has absolutely nothing to do with current advantages you may receive due to perceived race today. In terms of social interactions, if I see you as white and I place positive values onto white people specifically for being white, then it makes not one iota of difference if your family was the only enslaved white people (or what ever) during the civil war. The only effect would be loss of familial wealth before that time. Well this is especially r…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:42 PM
2

Generalities do not disprove outliers...
/r/MensRights07/05/13 01:05 PM
1

This guy was opposing a law that made it illegal to beat your wife... You realize we are talking a country with honor killings and the like? This isn't a first world nation, this is a third world country with crushing poverty and is still bound within a largely precapitalist, traditional culture. Just because someone says that are for men's rights doesn't make worthy of defense.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:58 PM
0

Although that may be an indicator of someone losing an argument, you ought not be so certain that once you are called a bigot that you have won a debate. In this situation, I completely agree with you about this fighter. It's unfair, and getting hyper-sensitive about someone stating facts (fox is NOT biologically a female, this cannot be denied). But have some introspection, perhaps there is a grain of truth in what your accusers may say. It was this that allowed me to break from my bigoted cons…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:33 PM
1

Physical capabilities are a given. Or are you assuming that I am not even a moderately mentally capable individual who can see the difference between mine and most other men's physical strengths as compared to women? Men are more logical and less emotional? Where is a evidence that this is a biological manifestation and not merely social conditioning from an early age? There is an idea in which we can act on a certain illogical position, such as believing in a mythical god, that we make his pres…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:26 PM
1

Please point to some 'natural,' I take here you mean scientific, origin to the ability to "handle business."
/r/MensRights04/04/13 03:03 PM
16

Your comment wreaks of sexism. Both men and women can "handle business." This is no "natural benefit" of maleness, merely social expectations that we should have long outgrown.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:07 PM
-4

What are you talking about man? White people do in fact have advantages over others within society. This isn't to say that specific white men suffer, but to deny that there are general advantages to whiteness is to deny reality.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:26 AM
48

You are pure garbage my good friend, utter, conspiratorial, ape-brained trash. You exemplify the reason MRAs are berated, because good, caring, logical men are coupled along with beasts such as yourself. Take your rape apologetics and kindly fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 01:02 AM
2

a 15 with a 20 year old.... idk, I feel that I am an open-minded human, but that shit would fly like a goddamned stone with me if some 20 year old was trying to shack up with my 15 year old sister or brother. There is still brain growth during these years, and you people seem to be equating a 30yr-25yr pair with the formerly mentioned pairing... which is just a completely different situation due to social child-raising practices and biological timing ("maturity" as we call it). All is not some g…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:33 AM
3

Ahh... Progress!
/r/MensRights20/04/12 01:01 PM
2

There are real legislative initiatives being taken by conservative legislatures to make it needlessly more difficult to get an abortion and contraception. These politicians are attempting to garner the votes of the primitive-minded. These people believe in sky spirits, free market absolutism, and various forms of bigotry. In your hatred for feminists you forget these insane people exist. Although I believe in no devils or gods, this quote seems apt, "The Devil's greatest accomplishment was convi…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:21 PM
6

Women are not our oppressive rulers. Women do have special privileges born of the clash between modern values and dark age gender expectations, but this does not mean women have an objective societal rulership over men. There are general gender expectations in society that put men at a disadvantage, but I see no evidence that there are institutions set in place to actually make men subservient. Although, alimony and child support laws can, and are in some cases as r/MR definitely knows, applied …
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:26 PM
1

I guess the people reading will draw their own conclusions then. Good day.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:58 PM
1

You posted multiple definitions, the first definition is the common one and deals with mental processes, ie psychical as opposed to physical. When people use psychic they mainly speak of the supernatural. Funnily enough, in the early history of PSYCHology they even used the word "psychic" to describe functions of the mind. But what do I know, I'm just a big stupid!
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:52 PM
1

I think you mistake psychical with psychic, which may be due to your general unwillingness to engage your own psychical abilities. Good luck with the tinnitus, hope that gets better so your brain will be better rested.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:39 PM
1

What ever lets lets you sleep at night buddy.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:26 PM
5

I am not attracted to intelligence, I am attracted to the person that manifests that intelligence. Why would i type all of that out when I could just use two words?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:14 PM
4

So we can never be attracted to way in which an intelligent woman displays her intelligence? Ok... ?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:05 PM
15

And you also deaden your emotions. We are not built to give no fucks about rejection, it is antisocial and disadvantageous to humans as we evolved. This hyper individuality and worship of narcissistic behavior is a recent paradigm in our human existence.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:01 PM
11

No one wants to restrict you from doing what ever you want. I myself wouldn't mind a casual hook up every now and then, but actually knowing the person and being both attracted to their physical features and psychical personhood makes it so much better IMO. It is a myth that only women get pleasure from emotional connection.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:57 PM
4

If the assault continues, and they are disrupting everyone else's good time, then they should be broken up an thrown out.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:35 PM
0

Couldn't agree more. We must make sure to check ourselves so that we don't fall into the fallacies of dark age thought, though it seems many here do.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:37 PM
7

But they are as men. Only the very too echelons of white male society benefit from our sexist society. Poor whites died to defend the institution of slavery that they never benefited from, men die everyday to defend patriarchal ideals that deem them less than human. Smash all bigotry and oppression.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:45 PM
2

Black men kill themselves and each other over the immense pressure of being stereotypes derived from being both black and male. Fuck your bullshit, bc minorities with the least power in society are being absolutely ravaged by sexism and bigotry in society. Or should I point out the amount of black and Latino men in prison in comparison to whites?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:42 PM
1

Perhaps I was callous, but it isn't there child and a father wants to take care of his progeny. Their pain does not trump his pain and rights, which is what the quote hints that their pain does do that.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:20 AM
2

I very much agree. More of these centers will further bring the humanity of male emotions into the mainstream.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:18 AM
-1

Which could be accounted for in sexist stereotypes women hold of themselves that they should be the caregivers or should hold more responsibility than men in holding families together.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:17 AM
1

Of course you are correct in everything you said, but gender stereotypes believed by men of women and gender stereotypes believed by men of themselves may be the most reasonable answer. You cannot deny that these stereotypes exist, and of they do they must have some real manifestation in human behavior.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:16 AM
3

This isn't a novelty account. I just thought it was a clever name.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:26 PM
8

Yeah, that line made me particularly angry. I'm sorry if I don't give two fucks about an adoptive parent who doesn't get to take a child from his/her father.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:13 PM
4

If I remember from my gender studies class, if you take out all the variables in occupational choice and adjust for hours worked, there is still a difference of like 4-7% in pay (women being paid less). This can be accounted for in certain stereotypical attitudes in society that paint women as less professionally knowledgeable. Although there is still a small pay gap, it is not nearly as large as a people would like to claim. The pay gap seems to be explained by subconscious stereotyping and not…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:57 PM
8

If I ever have kids and one of them is female I will not baby them like most people. I can see it in my family members in how if a 2 year old boy falls everyone says, "Get up, you are ok," if anything at all. If the same happens to a 2 year old girl, everyone is instantly all over her asking if she is ok. It's bullshit and breeds weakness.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:43 PM
3

The only problem I see is that many men probably won't go to these meetings initially. Other men may actually deride those who do as "whiners" or "pussies" for admitting there are problems with male gender roles. Having said that, this is a step, and I see great potential in this project.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:17 PM
7

Society tells women everyday that that is what they should care about in a man. It is great credit to women and humanity as a whole that a large portion do not fall of this anti-human ruse.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:31 PM
0

Let me guess, you are also a right-wing religious twat too? Because you sure like to spew bullshit without any proof.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 01:36 PM
0

Now you are just stating absurdities. I can choose not to pay the mafia protection money, but if I don't they could easily and likely use their force against me to coerce me into paying for their "service." I have to ask, do you right libertarians even live in reality? Edit: Not that states dont use the same tactics, but they are held to at least some accountability by the people. Even the most brutal regimes must fear rebellion; unrestrained absolutism is a myth.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 01:19 PM
-2

Yes, that's why you hear all of those story's about policemen and others shooting white men in their neighborhoods for no reason other than fear of their skin color. /s "But judge, the wallet looked like a gun!!!"
/r/MensRights31/03/12 01:27 PM
2

Thanks for the calm response. I am used to being attacked at the mere mention certain things on reddit.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 10:45 PM
2

His statement was ignorant, but the scientist supremacism displayed on reddit is disgusting. Where would society be without both the scientific minded and the artistic? But it is not just the arts you people shit on, it's the study of human behavior in general as well. It's just deplorable.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:57 AM
-4

Unfortunately, men's rights attracts right-wing filth who are looking to return to a more barbaric past.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 01:38 PM
1

This is true. I worked at GameStop and for a while we only had one girl working there. She wasn't that cute and had a certain... U pleasant smell to her (but most of my coworkers were constantly trying to bang her). She was socially inept (more than me which is pretty bad), played games but couldn't seem to remember the basic concepts those games were based on, and constantly made mistakes. Non of those mattered, she consistently got better sales than most of the male employees. I think it's mor…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 01:36 PM
6

Mario and Zelda, so mainstream. I play only play indie games the production values are so much better. /s
/r/MensRights08/03/12 01:23 PM
12

The problem with history is that is really important. If one truly understands history, they can see how fucked up the world is and more importantly WHY. Most people do not understand the why of history and society, which leads to many engineer types, who have grown quite large egos, to espouse nonsense theories on society. Employers don't want to hire someone who knows they are exploitative by the nature of their career. But hey, maybe I am just a bitter history major who doesn't know shit beca…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:13 AM
5

Why the fuck are you talking about socialists? The ones who brought you the 40 hour work week, consumer protections, and civil rights?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:20 PM
1

The fact that you put those 3 in the same sentence hints toward you being in possession of a mind that chained by propaganda and a poor understanding of history. That being said, I think one can have a fucked up home life in general that makes them go insane, not just a terrible mom.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:56 PM
7

And a shame that the many science-oriented redditors understand little of the social sciences but think they are such intellectual gods that their education in the hard sciences allows them some higher insight into the human condition than the history and (HA!) psychology majors. This attitude has so poisoned university and society to such an extent that even those that teach the social science have lost respect for their own profession and relegate themselves to examining inane and pointless th…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 02:47 AM
13

Gangs don't build roads or public education programs.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 03:40 AM
-1

Anarchocapitalism... the most brutish and dictatorial of ideologies.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 03:38 AM
1

She may not be a bad person, but she is intellectually deficient in the area of logical thought on metaphysics. When people pray instead of actually doing things and offer pathetic excuses for the horrors of this world, it becomes something I cannot over look.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 06:32 PM
8

So you would look for a Superstitious girl who believes in drinking symbolic blood, consuming symbolic flesh, and eternal burning for not believing unsubstantiated claims? I'll pass on church.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 12:16 AM
-2

Have fun not using roads. And military defense. And an educated populace. And quality food protection. Etc.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter