TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Uninspiring_Username Archive

View 2 posts and 107 comments by Uninspiring_Username on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

rough anal hehehe
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 09:28 PM
1

This argument is 100% semantics - the penalties are the exact same for the female on male crime, forced penetration.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 09:27 PM
1

Right but what does that have to do with the post you were replying to?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 09:26 PM
-1

I don't think the RP dynamic is inherently wrong I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 09:26 PM
1

last word
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 07:29 PM
1

I'm saying you imply that being unegalitarian improves your happiness. It doesnt
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 07:29 PM
1

But you were replying to me though?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:47 PM
1

I dont believe your link between being unegalitarian and being happy is real. I dont believe "not divorced" = "happy"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:30 PM
3

In my marriage no-one automatically has the last word on joint decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:29 PM
1

See: 600 years of English common law which has honed the standard of reasonable belief to a knife edge.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:29 PM
1

Their responses will be "I would take her view into consideration and conclude she was right and choose freely to return it". The obvious follow up is "what should a woman do if her husband DOESNT appear to take her view into consideration or act reasonably?" They dont have an answer for that, or at least not one that doesnt conflict with half the other stuff they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:28 PM
0

My definition doesnt specify who does the penetrating (i.e. it could be the victim. Penetration is a clumsy word. We could just as easily call it "Engulfment" for the reverse implication.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:26 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:25 PM
1

My pet dog isnt worthless, it doesnt mean I should treat my supposed "partner" like one
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:25 PM
1

My marriage runs on consensus. Been fine for 20 years so far
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 05:24 PM
3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_captain_goes_down_with_the_ship
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:30 PM
-1

They are D/s dynamic without the D/s benefits. In D/s they are doing it because they both get off on it and fully consent. In RP marriages they are doing it because they believe (based on very little science) that this is the "natural order" of things. If the wife decides she doesnt consent anymore in an RP marriage, its not like the husband will agree to a different balance of responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:26 PM
2

Penetrative sexual contact without a reasonable belief in consent
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:23 PM
0

Presumably you felt equally important as the owner of the farm?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:22 PM
0

A captain of a ship would die to protect any one of his crew, does that make them more valuable?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:21 PM
1

Thats what equality means in the context of human relationships. We aren't talking about equality of height, are we.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:19 PM
-3

Who self-evidently dominates her husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 12:14 PM
1

No it isnt. Equal has a very clear meaning. Your children can be rapturously happy but no-one would claim they are equal to you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 12:13 PM
1

Normally there is a degree of dissembly whereby people claim their wives are equal but they have to do what they are told.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:21 AM
1

evidently "no"?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:20 AM
-1

You can choose to have an unequal dynamic, it doesnt redefine what it means to be equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:20 AM
-1

whats funny is about 1/3 of the RP respondants have replied "yes, equal but different".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:19 AM
1

its not oppression, just shallowness, narcissism and egotism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:18 AM
-1

If authority didnt matter, you wouldnt be so terrified of giving it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:15 AM
-1

Please provide evidence that importance and authority are not directly linked
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:15 AM
3

Saying "these two roles are equal" doesn't make it so. Having the last word on all decision making betrays the lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:11 AM
1

Exactly. TRP is "a guide for damaged low sophistication guys to attract damaged low sophistication girls"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:10 AM
1

Those two things are not mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 09:40 PM
1

EXACTLY - he doesnt see his partner as his equal (because if he did the same standards would apply as those by which he values himself), he sees her as a subordinate (and thus the criteria are different).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 09:15 PM
1

its bullshit though. Why believe bullshit. A lot of "AWALT" claims dont even apply to MOST women, let alone all. It should be "AACSALT" - almost all club-sluts are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 09:13 PM
2

My gender is quantum-vaginomorph. Technically one word.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 09:12 PM
0

delta is people who are too pathetic to be betas. it is a friend zone because the women chooses not to escalate the relationship, that's the choice she's exercising How is it not the man's choice to keep being her friend, doing her favours etc? None of this is obvious but it keeps the dynamic going of the man offering more and more of himself and getting nothing in return despite pining for it. But no-one mentally healthy and actually "nice" does this. If you want more than you have from a relat…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 09:08 PM
1

These aren't friendzoned people, these are beta (or delta) orbiters - men who are desperately trying to earn enough friendship points to get sex; fundamentally, deluded and entitled pervs. Describing that like its something the woman has DONE to him is just ridiculous. He did it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 08:02 PM
1

It's odd (though not uncommon, I suppose) to equate what one does for a living to one's intellectual and qualitative competence. Why is it odd? Denying that it correlates highly seems perverse. I know a lot of very successful douchebags who I consider to not be my equal in either intellectual nor qualitative terms. Those douchebags probably value skills you dont. E.g. their ability to bullshit, negotiate etc. They didnt get successful by accident. One of my best friends is pretty much a free-spi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:59 PM
-1

Women tend to complain that men "only want me for sex but lie and pretend they want more to keep me on the hook". This I guess is a corollary to a woman who dangles sex as a lure (never given) to extract emotional or financial security from men, but outside of extreme outliers and fiction these kinds of deals arent exactly common.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:20 PM
1

The idea of dating someone who is not your intellectual and qualitative equal is anathema to me. It is statistically highly improbable that the secretary will have remotely the same IQ or qualities as the CEO (of course you can quibble that she might be a genius high flier working as a secretary for reasons but this is inane and doesnt hold up to probability analysis). The kinds of guys I know who are in that kind of unbalanced relationship fit the mold I was describing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:17 PM
1

Here is a MUCH better study design: Participants are asked their income and then to rate a persons attractiveness out of 10. Photos of 30 persons of the opposite gender are displayed at random with a label of their income (also random distributed evenly above, around, and below the participants). You could then model exactly any relationship between the score and the salary both objectively and comparative to the participants.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:09 PM
1

I'm describing what I mean by "middle aged frat boy" culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:04 PM
2

that imaginary survey
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 05:13 PM
1

"Boys will be boys".. "man time"... "women just dont get it!"... Insecure little men desperately trying to one-up one another in order to feel like the big swinging dick they are not and dont have. If this is the funniest thing you've read in a while you should get out more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 05:11 PM
1

This is just one of many times on PPD where a guy from a conservative US "middle aged frat boy" culture basically cant comprehend that other people work differently to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 09:13 AM
1

No man who believes women are his equal will marry his secretary or yoga instructor. The kind of man who does that sees women as a sexual accessory or a bauble. The artists may be an exception. I am a man who finds success and accomplishment attractive in women. Looking around at my colleagues and their partners, I am far from alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 09:23 PM
1

He is the red pill paradigm.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 08:47 PM
-1

The vast majority of single mothers have been abandoned by their babby daddys because fatherhood isnt compatible with being an overgrown manchild who hates responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 08:46 PM
8

TRPers certainly cherry-pick science and news reports to support their faith-based beliefs and purport that the mainstream view is a conspiricy to keep men down, so I can see the parallels. TRPers arent getting any better either.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 08:43 PM
1

I love that you gave me a list of conservative dudes with trophy wives as a counterexample....
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 08:33 PM
2

Find me high powered liberal man who is dating a waitress. You wont. You'll find conservative men who want a trophy wife who they dont respect as an equal. High powered liberal men date high powered liberal women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 05:41 PM
2

I've never, ever met a man who is as concerned about his wife's career and ability to make money as the wife is about his. The majority of people I know are like this, but I dont know any gold-diggers, only high-powered professionals of both gendeers. Perhaps we move in different circles. "If only I could find a woman with a steady job and worthwhile career...", whereas I've heard so many women express this exact lament. I guess I've never heard this sentiment because I dont have any friends who…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 04:30 PM
1

Your very sexist comments are overwhelmingly downvoted, and thus not controversial
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 02:48 PM
1

lmaeow
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 02:46 PM
1

They always claim to be trolling in retrospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 02:45 PM
1

I'm not saying people who work in retail are stupid, I'm saying people in law and finance are incredibly smart and ambitious. If you are still in retail at 28, you aren't on a high-achieving trajectory. This isnt debatable. Still true and I'm BP to my core
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 02:10 PM
3

You genuinely believe if we did a study of all single mothers, the majority would be single as a result of them leaving (or refusing to commit to) the father rather than the other way around?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 01:26 PM
3

Most single mothers are not divorced women who initiated their divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 01:00 PM
2

The thing is, modern ambitious liberal men in their 30s feel at least as strongly about unemployed "loser" women as you are accurately describing women feeling about equivalent men. Its not gendered, at least among people without traditional conservative views of gender roles. If you are ambitious or driven, you inevitably respect ambition and drive. Modern liberal couples want to respect each other. Your observation is merely, therefore, that people who value a particular quality they have high…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 12:59 PM
4

he's never read or heard of rp or seduction How can you be this into a subject (RPW, RP and all the related pseudo-scientifc fields of related enquiry) and not have ever discussed it with your husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 12:55 PM
1

You could be my fiance describing both our relationship and our view on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 12:53 PM
5

So its red pill without the blustering lies and self-blame instead of woman-blame basically?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 12:46 PM
11

"Lets pretend TRP guys have all of the positive qualities men can have and BP foreveralone guys have all of the negative qualities men can have. Which do you pick"? What a fucking dumb OP. At least make it realistic - the TRP guy is also arrogant, dismissive, a misogynist, socially conservative, disrespectful, unfaithful, lecherous, entitled, angry, belittling, sexually pushy, emotionally unavailable and pent up, and at times emotionally abusive, does not have female friends, uncommunicative, st…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 12:21 PM
1

Single motherhood is vastly more a male-driven phenomena than a female-driven one. Very few women WANT to be a single mother, whatever spin TRP likes to put on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 12:19 PM
1

You are asking the wrong people - most red pillers came from broken homes
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 12:18 PM
1

Morally and legally you are wrong, though the latter is less relevant as presumably in your scenario they dont press charges. Unless you are saying that in your scenario the person saying no ACTUALLY does mean yes at that time, rather than changing their mind a few seconds in.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 09:01 AM
1

The bit I dont understand is who you mean by "they" and what you mean by "it". So they were correct in the end, regardless of their decision They werent correct "in the end", they were wrong at the time their view mattered (i.e. point of penetration).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:07 PM
2

You are saying you dont believe civil rights came about because of the civil rights movement.... and MY claim to the contrary is outrageous?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:06 PM
1

I think I misunderstand what you are talking about. Could you explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 04:26 PM
1

That is still retroactive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 03:17 PM
2

Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 01:11 PM
1

...they dont? and if they do its wrong. The morality cant be retconned, it changes from the second your consent state is communicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 01:11 PM
2

Sometimes I think you are a troll parodying right wing conservatism.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 01:09 PM
1

They are no more easily indentifiable than that casual sexism was in the 90s. Its a gradual change in normative social attitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 01:08 PM
1

WHOOOSH
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 07:31 PM
2

Go watch some TV from the 90s and notice all the casual sexism. People dont seem to realise how much society has changed in even that short time. Once you have noticed those subtle changes you will know the kinds of things I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 07:29 PM
3

"my ass" basically
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 12:10 PM
2

The vast improvement in racism is BECAUSE of activism and cultural changes FORCED onto many people who opposed them. Thats my point. You are acting like the retreat of racism was some inevitable course rather than the result of an enormous amount of effort by exactly the kinds of people you hate so much. The same goes for sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 12:06 PM
3

Sexual success and happiness I guess - the stated goals of TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 08:35 PM
-2

This is like in the 1960s saying "I see racial equality as a pipe dream therefore I oppose civil rights". It doesnt follow. The impossibility of the perfect is not an argument against aiming for improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 08:22 PM
3

TRP as a set of observations is amoral. TRP as a strategy however is not amoral so much as immoral. Implementing something like dread game is actively immoral, its not neutral, its making other people feel insecure so they will treat you better. That's not amoral by any reasonably definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 08:21 PM
0

You should have added "exploit it for cheap, meaningless thrills" because its not like TRPers are achieving actual rewarding results.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 08:19 PM
0

Please can you describe your life before and after RP? Not the mental attitude stuff, the actual objectively measurable effects?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 08:17 PM
1

Please can you describe your life before and after RP? Not the mental attitude stuff, the actual objectively measurable effects?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 08:17 PM
0

So can you describe your life before and after RP? Not the mental attitude stuff, the actual objectively measurable effects?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 08:17 PM
4

I'm sorry but if you are low status at 2xBW DL you arent going to magically be high status at 3xBW. Beyond a fairly low threshold increased BB gains =/= increased SMV. You'd be far better off maintaining that level of strength and cutting your body fat %, which has a vastly greater visual impact. But what do I know, I'm just a blue pill guy in an incredibly rewarding LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 08:14 PM
1

Its like joining the KKK because you like the free cookies and look good in white.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 07:35 PM
0

For a marriage, men are content with reasonable looks, pleasant demeanor, functioning uterus and reasonable sexual activity Women however, once they loose the 'tingles' for their beta bux which they previously experienced with alpha fucks, the 'just coffee meetings' with ex boyfriends, vacations 'alone' and divorce race begins. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 03:51 PM
2

Every girl I know has settled with the highest value person they have ever been with. None of the girls I know well have really materially "slept around", certainly not the "picked up a guy in a bar for a ONS" that Red Pill talks about as if its universal. I know OF girls like that (and man)... lets just say they are from a different social class to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 03:49 PM
0

I still dont get how you reconcile this with RPW. Why be RPW rather than just having a classic dom-sub relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 03:45 PM
5

Depends on the relationship or lack thereof between the two people. Two almost-strangers? Its a date. Two long time friends? Its not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 03:42 PM
1

Literally half the article is about how the rules and processes used by colleges disadvantage men unfairly.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 03:41 PM
1

Thats not true here. Its been accepted by us BPers in debates in this sub hundreds of times that college rules of this nature are horrendous.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 03:23 PM
1

Those people are morally and legally wrong. This is the exact inverse of the "consented to sex but change their mind the morning after" situation which Red Pill gets so incensed about. You cant retrospectively change the morality of an act. This shouldnt be arguable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 03:21 PM
0

I agree with everything you've written. What I think was missing was any sort of counter recommendation. How should schools handle claims of sexual assault? Thats because there isnt an easy answer - we need schools to think carefully about these issues, but they are coming out of a multiple-decade long period of basically telling rape victims to get fucked, so the risk is if we put the brakes on too hard we just go back to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 06:47 PM
4

You need to be specific. You are using deliberately vague language. Was she involved in the sex? Did she lie there motionless in silence? What does "not enthusiastic" mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 06:41 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 06:38 PM
1

the differences between the two are sophistry and hair splitting. one is a subset of the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 04:19 PM
11

She is one of the highest rated law professors at Harvard Law School, one of the leading minds in the "critical legal analysis" school of jurisprudence.... and you are saying she is trash / a useful idiot merely because she is also a feminist? This woman shits all over any accomplishment you will ever reach and you are betraying your complete lack of rationality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 04:16 PM
1

If she doesnt consent its rape, duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 04:11 PM
8

It would entirely depend on what you mean by: Guy pushes on, she doesn't stop him or consent still, and they have sex. What does this mean? Did she have sex with him? Did she say no and just lie there impassively? Did she grab his cock, slap it inside her and ride him like a rodeo? Enjoying sex and feeling physical desire are irrelevant to consent. The only thing that matters is whether she consented. She doesnt need to SAY she consented, but she needs to consent through her words OR actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 04:09 PM
1

It entirely depends what you mean by Guy pushes on, and they have sex
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 03:44 PM
3

"Get in shape" is blue pill advice as much as red pill. Its just "good advice". Blue pill isnt "JUST BE FAT AND IF SHE DOESNT LIKE IT, SHE CAN FUCK OFF" like the inane red pill straw man charicatures claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 06:44 PM
1

People come on to the purplepilldebate... and very few, if any of them are as bad as people assumed. Every time we do a survey of "has coming on PPD made you think better or worse of TRP?", BPers and PPers alike universally say "worse", so I;m not sure where you get this from. Saying evil shit in a nice tone doesnt make you nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 06:41 PM
2

This is handwavey confirmation biased bullshit. Plenty of men do care, the ones that stick around dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 06:40 PM
4

If you consistently straw man blue pill advice then sure, red pill advice seems better. True blue pill advice is that women need more warming up than men. They dont just suddenly want sex after doing something non-sexual for ages. If you want more sex with your partner, focus on getting them in the mood - this includes: i) forecasting (telling them earlier in the day what you plan to do to them later that night. Little reminders, e.g. texts or calls during the days reinforcing this) Yes, this in…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 04:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter