TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Uniqueusername121 Archive

View 4 posts and 114 comments by Uniqueusername121 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Agree, and thank You for being cool About it.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 11:00 PM
-2

I knew what I’d find here, and here it is. Look. It’s absolutely terrible that she hit him, and she clearly instigates violence- not him. The issue is it’s nobody’s right to hit another person. So when you guys in here say what you’re saying, that not only did he have the right to hit back but that you’re mad he has to apologize, you’re making a men’s rights mistake, and it is what makes it so easy to say that MRAs are wrong. He doesn’t have a right to hit her back anymore than she had a right t…
/r/MensRights04/01/23 01:06 PM
4

I do see your point, yes, that he is cast aside as an accessory to the real story, but his story isn’t the movie. I mean, nobody thought about the laughing bullies’ or extra customers’ stories in this situation either bc that’s not what movies do. But again, I understand what you mean that his situation was ignored. I just think that’s how stories work: they focus on the main character. That doesn’t mean though that I don’t get that his story matters- I truly do get that. I’m just saying the emb…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 01:46 AM
3

Nope. And I’m on y’all’s side. This is mocking the mother and illustrating the girl’s embarrassment. The boy clearly is not at fault in this scene and is being falsely accused, and only the mother looks bad. You can’t be taken seriously if you make up stuff to be upset about, and frankly you don’t need to. There’s enough negative stuff happening to men that is real.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 08:53 AM
-1

I am thoroughly disappointed This is why it’s so difficult to defend this movement even though I agree w its foundations wholeheartedly. To be crystal clear: I am certain it is probably devastatingly frustrating to continue to be treated with the dismissive attitudes most feminists have towards this movement. It’s absolutely infuriating. The problem with supporting the MR movement is the anger that this causes in men-and rightly so—- but it also creates the same male behavior as feminism-and tha…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:56 AM
1

Pretty sure there were no pussies on either of those people
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/22 08:31 AM
1

We are watching Philly become a "conspiracy theorist" before our eyes. Enjoy the rabbit hole, DF.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:31 PM
1

This is the second post on this sub that I've seen that harms the men's rights movement, bc it's about being angry at a woman or women in general and not about advancing the causes of men. Mods? This isn't r/ pussy pass denied. It's important that men are protected and their rights advanced. But if this post made r/ all, it would make the movement look as angry and purposeless as feminism. Let's do better.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:19 PM
6

Murder. Straight up murder. I likey.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/17 05:32 PM
4

I have to say. I support men's rights quite strongly. But you come off as a dick in this post. 5 judges? 5? Sure, they're corrupt as hell but the evidence must have been there. Now sure. The child's coached testimony is absolutely possible evidence- which is terrible, and certainly could have been manipulated and totally wrong. But there are two indefensible points you're making. The first- and one that makes you really look like a dick- is that you want your fucking child to atone for her mothe…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:23 AM
0

WaPo is not a great source. Not saying you're wrong, but WaPo is definitely a tool for establishment.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:43 AM
5

The girls are sad products of the MSM, but tbf he's loaded with false equivalencies.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/17 06:21 AM
2

Seriously. My options are great, and I find many many men my age want an attractive 40 year old. My friend is 50 and found no problem landing a 10 years younger man. E: especially one enthusiastic about sex.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:20 PM
9

Am 40 year old woman. I think this is fake. I find that I have MANY more options than the men of my age. Is it possible that someone wrote this bc they're trying to sell a service to these women? Either way, if you're a reasonably attractive 40-55 year old woman, you have plenty of options.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:32 PM
3

It's also correlated with being uneducated, so of Course.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 08:39 PM
1

Dude. She raised his children so he had time to be at work. Period. If she didn't do that he couldn't have been At WORK building his wealth. Dude. E: this is why no one else has argued with my point, DUDE. Bc it's accurate.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/17 02:01 AM
1

What about "that's not the point" are you not understanding? Yes, she was paid. 3% when she deserved Far, Far more. The reason you don't disagree, and instead accuse me of being offended: you know I'm right. Otherwise post a decent argument why she didn't deserve her fair share. Edit: obligatory "just stop dude."
/r/TheRedPill28/06/17 01:50 AM
1

Aye, bud. Your names are meaningless. The amount matters not at all. It's what is fair for her sacrifice- her most attractive (and therefore most lucrative) years married to this guy. You can call me names and pretend my points are easily blown off but you've done nothing to prove me wrong. Bc I'm not. You just have certain attitudes towards women.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/17 01:31 AM
1

Nope, I like Bill Burr and agree with him on a lot of topics. This post isn't reflective of Bill, although I appreciate your appeal to authority.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/17 06:59 PM
1

If he chose to have children with her, someone has to care for them. It's daily planning and care even if he paid a nanny. If she hadn't been there, he would have had to pay someone else who wasn't their own mother, or do it himself, limiting the amount of time he could be at work and building his money. That's building a life together. She deserves more than what he gave her. Look, I get it the laws are unfair to men, but this man is the reason why. I don't agree with it or support it bc I saw …
/r/TheRedPill27/06/17 06:57 PM
2

You yourself admitted you lost money in the beginning and middle of the marriage. You yourself admit to keeping your salary low for the purposes of the divorce! Was there EVER a day she stayed at home with the children while you worked? BECAUSE IF SO She helped YOUR BUSINESS! Somebody has to raise the kids you yourself agreed to. You could not have worked the hours you did if nobody was there to raise your children. Somebody had to care for them- You had them too. It's called being a mammal- thi…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/17 08:09 PM
-1

That's not really the point though. She built a life with him, stuck by him, and her only crime was cheating, yet he gave her 3% of the assets he rebuilt while with her. If she hadn't been around to raise his kids, he couldn't have worked as much and built the money back up. He chose to have kids just like she did, somebody has to raise them.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 02:45 PM
0

He had money. Married. Lost money. Took out debt and kept his salary artificially low while his business rebounded.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 02:42 PM
-12

Do you think it is morally okay to take from your wife what she helped you rebuild? As you yourself said, she got 3%. Would you think that was fair if your daughter's future husband did the same to her? Assuming your daughter will one day help a man and build a life with him? Let's assess. You admit you wanted her bc she was beautiful- equally, she wanted you bc you were rich. So you're even there. You lost all your money while together but she stayed married to you, and cheated with one person.…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 01:19 PM
1

She likes assuming things. It works for her.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:05 AM
1

This is really long and since it's probably as nonsensical as everyone can read your prior posts as being, I don't care enough to respond. I know you SJWs will fight til you're dead, even when obviously wrong, so I'm gonna assume that is the case here. Thank goodness for your lack of self awareness , otherwise this wouldn't be half as entertaining. I'm assuming: I haven't read it.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:11 AM
1

Are you saying that you and this person were not asserting two directly oppositional sides to an argument? You think men should pay child support regardless of how a woman is impregnated. Your reasoning for this is that it's the child's right. The person with whom you are conversing says that a man who was defrauded into an unwanted child has no financial obligation to that child. I'm a pretty good reader and that sounds like two opposing views to me. Then you went into an extended discussion, e…
/r/MensRights09/06/17 07:00 PM
2

Why would my children be neglected due to me posting on Reddit? Are you actually suggesting that every person with children is neglectful if they post on reddit? I'm pointing out that you're wrong and ending the argument due to that fact bc it's not clear to you. Finally, I disagree completely with your assessment of how to gauge conversations. After all, in the conversation you just had, the other person won. So if you see debates in those terms, somebody didn't lose- only you did. You're kinda…
/r/MensRights09/06/17 12:26 PM
3

This isn't men's rights. It's an isolated incident that has nothing to do with gender. I'm a supporter, but this isn't an issue for the sub.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 12:01 PM
1

This is fake and doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 11:53 AM
1

Woman here. It is really hard to give up the benefits of being a woman. Being honest. At the same time, I see the situation for what it is. And I definitely believe that things are improving in women's consciousness.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:47 AM
0

I get the feeling this is supposed to be funny. Hahahaha humans wanting equality.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:13 AM
4

You're not leaving the argument due to anyone being rude to you- you're the one who has been name calling throughout. The person with whom you're arguing has accused you only of sexism-it's the only "insult" s/he has used and it's one that feminists throw around like it's nothing. You're leaving the argument because you're losing, and it's clear for anyone who has read this far. Including me- a woman, with children, who receives child support.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:04 AM
1

Sounds entirely reasonable. The egalitarian movement.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:14 PM
1

Thank you! Is there any chance that patriarchal influences tell women they can't succeed in such positions? Is there any research (non feminist/women's studies biased) that can definitively argue this is not the case? I ask because I want a reasonable response To the argument, not bc I believe it.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:14 PM
3

I think it's more seeing men as being the ones who should be doing the heavy work. See the comment about how this isn't about the woman. It's about the man, 100%.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:24 PM
2

I support the men's rights movement. But I do want to understand what the movement believes about what causes women to seek out these degrees. Is it personal choice? Is it societal influence? What do we know about this?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:18 PM
3

It is. I'm new. I'm a woman, and I'm an old school feminist (meaning I believe in equality and not special privilege). If you can think of a better name for It, let me know. Awareness is rising- literal hunger will do that to a population. And Americans are literally hungry.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:11 PM
12

Because you want to feel something that isn't selfish in your life. Because when you share something with someone you love you get an endorphin rush that is enjoyable, and that builds trust. So you can experience love and connection.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/17 04:18 PM
23

The overboard part is replacing communication and connection with dominance displays. Agreed that women want to see and feel the implied but never overt dominance. But they want a partner too, and if a man spends his entire life focusing on that dominance display, he's never going to connect with a woman, and he misses out on all the best parts of life because of it.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/17 04:16 PM
2

Be like Bernie, I always say: stick to the points. Even if you're repeating yourself. Always ask pointed questions calmly. Their point is to rile emotions, but if you ask the right questions at the right time, emotion free, it completely unravels that goal. You will lose all credibility if you succumb to any negative, nasty behavior. Good for you for your maturity.k
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:12 PM
13

Deliberately linking men's rights with PUA. If the author had truly read hundreds or thousands of blog posts about men's rights, as claimed, s/he would see they are not the same.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:40 AM
2

This story is really, really sad. I'm sorry all this happened to you.
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 08:52 AM
9

It's hard to know how one might react to a lack of sleep, but impatience and irritability are common.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 09:52 AM
5

Not on edge. Is. What we called them in ww2 to be derogatory.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 09:38 AM
1

I'm not going to repeat myself. You can reread my answer and if you'd like to debate my actual argument, which you haven't done here, I'm happy to do that.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:59 AM
1

First of all, Dickens of a fiction writer to my knowledge. Second, the whole point is that it's not been done without authoritarianism ruining it, which capitalists then blame for it being a failure. (Then they suggest people read fiction, which is nothing more than one author's opinion in the results of authoritarianism). How many people are starving right now who are writing the exact same types of stories? Half the US population is either poor or near poor, so I'm sure in 100 years there will…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:27 PM
1

I didn't argue that point, in fact, I specifically said that wasn't the issue with the title. I have opinions about women and men and who stays home and who works, and what is best for offspring, but I didn't bring that up at all. Because it's not the point of the article, and it may be an accurate depiction of the woman. It's just not the point of the article. The point of the article is that the woman can't get a divorce because there's no no-fault divorce option, and how that's a problem.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:39 PM
2

I'm the same. I would like to see small scale capitalism to see if it works first, minus authoritarian and klepto governments, but basically, equality is what it is.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:17 PM
1

Anything that foments division is the goal of the capitalist class.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:14 PM
2

The issue here is that one person is able to trap the other into staying married bc there is not a no fault divorce option. I'm not saying the woman didn't do what is accused in title. But there needs to be some sort of option for splitting the assets and allowing a divorce. The best way to think of these things is to simply switch the sexes. Suppose it was a woman refusing the divorce to a man?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:05 PM
1

In 6 paragraphs. Of new (and totally contradictory of what you've clearly said before) information. I sincerely cannot anymore. Have the last word, I'll bet money you erase at least one of these posts, because you appear to be a pedo defender who just changes your point to quietly stop defending pedophiles. Have fun changing all your comments; I've lost interest.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:40 AM
1

It seems like you change your assertions in order to have the last word, so I'm not going to debate all these new points. Goalpost moving as a tactic is wholly frustrating for everyone, and is nothing more than an exercise in you telling yourself you're right.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:05 AM
1

JFC, I've made my point, at the bottom of every post. I made it in the first post! The main point is, again, that due to lesser reasoning abilities of a brain below the age of 30, there should be legal protections for those brains, male or female. Moreover, your point supports mine, that it's been shown that the human brain does not finish developing before the age of 30, and due to that, the age of majority should be raised. I'm not saying it should be 30, I'm just saying it shouldn't be 18. Bu…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 10:02 PM
1

Yes, I am aware of that. But you're suggesting that if we societally made a mass change in how babies are raised right now then their frontal lobes will develop earlier in our lifetimes, and that's simply not the case. Evolution takes time. I'm done with this discussion because you're splitting hairs instead having an adult discussion. I haven't made any argument that it's odd to be defending pedophilia when it's the obvious cheap shot, but your argumentation continues to be just misrepresentati…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:25 PM
1

The ridiculous thing about choosing a legal age like "16" is that all it does is create a cutoff for which police can begin to exploit the inability to reason, regulate emotion, and understand morality and consequences. And I didn't see anything theoretical about saying a 15 year old should be seen as an adult in terms of the law regarding sexual behavior. Not to be adversarial, but that is the point with which I vehemently disagreed, and extrapolating anything from that (like that I think kids …
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:07 PM
0

You're putting the baby before the bath water. You're right that we don't know what might happen to a brain if it is not raised in an authoritarian manner. I said as much in my prior post. You cannot make changes to protective legislation in anticipation of making sweeping changes to child rearing. The fact is, 15-year-old brains are what they are in this society, and therefore, need to be protected from exploitation. I've made literally no assertions about child rearing, just real world ones ab…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:49 PM
1

Higher level abstraction cannot be accomplished without the frontal lobe development. While it is true that environment will have some effect on this growth, you're talking about societal change that will result-in thousands of years- in an evolutionary change in the development of the frontal lobe. That doesn't justify making sweeping legislative changes that protect children from both victimization and punishment, neither of which they can understand entirely before frontal lobe development. W…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:39 PM
1

Can you please point out where I said 12 year olds shouldn't be exposed to adult responsibilities? Because I never said that. I have an 11 year old child and 13 year old child, and I don't think that. So I never said it. It was my point as well, that 18 year olds also lack judgement, and legal liability- at least in terms of putting people in cages for decades-should begin even later. (My last point is the cages are a poor punishment for anyone of any age).
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:05 PM
1

While I don't doubt all that to be true (I suspect though that you taught her steps and not that she could reason what is actually symbolized with algebra, but maybe she is), OP suggested allowing 12-13 year olds legal status that requires abstracting about morality AND behavior regulation. A blanket policy change should always be tied to what an average person can do, and the best scientific evidence we have for a majority of people that age. Our best evidence shows that adults at 40 are VERY d…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 05:30 PM
1

Respectfully, where are you getting your suppositions? Where do you get your statistics that "wealth and rebellion" create crime? Because last I checked, people steal because they're broke and use drugs to escape their misery, and those two crimes represent 40+% of our prison populations. (It's actually more than 40% because robbery is considered violent and not property crime). Next, let's address the fact that the human brain goes through a massive- its largest- growth spurt in the teen years,…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:29 PM
1

12 year olds have very little ability to regulate their behavior and almost none to make sound decisions. That's why they cannot consent to sexual relationships. 18 year olds regularly are sent to jail for decades for poor decisions made in youth, a situation already exploited by law enforcement (speaking of the US). I would suggest we RAISE the age of legal adulthood due to this problem. That said, I can agree that a 15 year old is not completely incapable of making decisions for him/herself, p…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:27 AM
1

Fair enough. What a fascinating bunch MRAs are (I mean no disrespect). Last night, I was told to take a Midol over a disagreement with an MRA, which to me, screams angry victim. Today, I learn that that victimhood is not what is desired, even though there are plenty of reasons to claim it. Bravo, seriously.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:49 PM
1

I'm confused. You're the original person who said women have more rights than men. Then someone else asked, do men have NO rights? And that's where you argued it was an exaggeration because men can get snipped. At any rate, I'm agreeing with your original premise, but not your later one. The semantics of it absolutely matter, because semantics is the branch of linguistics that has to do with meaning, and there is a significant difference in the meaning of contraception and reproduction. Because …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:27 PM
1

First, Wikipedia is never a source. Using a source that you can manipulate is not defensible. Second, you're conflating the method, contraception (getting snipped, using condom), with the right to reproduce or not (after conception takes place, have the baby or not). That is two discrete rights. Notice how under both scenarios, the woman is fully free of "discrimination, coercion, and violence." The man only has that right under the first. So, that is clearly fewer rights, since 1 is less than 2…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:35 PM
0

Here's a person who lost an argument, and knows it.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:33 PM
2

This is excellent, thank you. Intactivism could be added as well!
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:30 PM
2

Oh, I'm supposed to learn to let it go but you can keep on responding?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:33 AM
1

Another top notch response to a series of reasonable points. An argument that I could immediately say back to you verbatim is not an argument. Last, I haven't once resorted to name calling. It's unfortunate for all the MRAs out there who are working so hard to spread a message with maturity and grace.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:28 AM
1

Thank you; this is excellent. I should've looked here first. Thanks for patience.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:54 AM
1

Huh. So you knew exactly who I was talking to and I pegged it exactly when I said you were trying to denigrate my point. And then you explained why, like a normal person (for the most part). Still, the MRA community should reject you as a spokesperson, and not just because of the "who are you talking to" and "Anita" immaturity, although those don't help. Because of course you have every right to believe that they're all the same movement, (what you've done is taken MRA beliefs and mashed them to…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:44 AM
0

Good answer. Always best to find out early who is worth listening to and who isn't. I hope you don't do too much damage to the MRA movement.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:40 PM
1

Me too. They're using feminist tactics (angry name calling and "idgaf about you" attitude) that we all actively hate.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:39 PM
0

I'm not sure why I would need to state this, as people post videos on Reddit every day, and people make comments about those videos, as it's kind of the point. I am reacting to the content of the video. You know, like everybody does when a video is posted. Moreover, Anita didn't conflate reparations with feminism, and since I am not clairvoyant, I have no way of knowing if you are Hard Bastard, nor do I have any reason to believe you disagree with a video you posted, particularly in the context …
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:33 PM
1

Unfortunately you cannot conflate reparations toward blacks, who are genuine victims of systematic governmental discrimination with feminism, and have it be supported. You don't have to agree with reparations, even though current property ownership is a direct result of it and is easily shown to be divided along racial lines. But if you want your message to be heard and accepted by anyone on the true left, which is those of us who did not support Hillary Clinton, but are open to the MRA movement…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:12 PM
1

Yes, I agree, it's actually why I'm asking the question. I want to refute the statement with facts backed by legitimate research. Maybe there isn't any, or maybe it's too general to refute. I'm just looking for what is already out there.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:29 PM
1

I do see your point, and I understand that there are limitations when one generalizes the vocabulary. And I will look into it some more, but certainly research would operationalize those terms themselves. The very operationalization of the terms would reveal bias in the research, for that matter. But an MRA would operate under the general principle that what is taught in gender studies courses is not scientifically sound. I would agree. The question then remains, there must be scientific evidenc…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:27 PM
1

At least there was one person with some sense. Usually there's nobody on these panels with any. And the woman laughing is the absolute quintessential feminist attitude; it is infuriating.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 04:55 PM
3

This post does damage to the movement and should be removed. I'm sympathetic to actual concerns, but this attempt at humor is not funny, it's off-putting, and it delegitimizes real men's rights activists, who have real issues to defend. Edit: to be clear, the original article to which it is responding, is also trash and not worth reading.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 04:34 PM
3

I'm a third of the way down the page and still don't see a female rapist, though, and That just perpetuates the stereotype.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:57 PM
2

Waiting for an answer here. It's been 9 hours. I've yet to see a feminist stop moving goalposts or engaging in logical fallacies in pursuit of her narrative. Perhaps I should set a remindme so I can check back and see which of these she chooses. Not responding is the most courageous.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 12:12 PM
2

In this movie she was talking out of her ass, straight up. She hasn't thought through anything.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:51 AM
9

Not me, I'd have voted only for Sanders or someone with his policies. I'm a woman and old school feminist (in that I believe women deserve opportunity, most of which they've already achieved in the west, and some of which is not also given to men). And I absolutely am able to see the way that 3rd wave feminism has ruined the concept of equality, and defies logic and nature at every turn. There's way more of us than radical feminists. Thank God.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:50 AM
1

I just can't get over the fact that a man could be FORCED to have a child by a pregnant woman, and if he does work for 18 years to make child support payments that he deserves nothing in the way of credit. Even if he chose to have the child- 18 years of working and giving up half his pay means he's worthless. SMDH.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 12:05 AM
1

Thank you, finally got it and deleted my confusing posts.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 10:29 PM
–

That'll you, should I go ahead and change it?
/r/MensRights25/02/17 10:17 PM
–

Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/sadcringe/comments/5w40s5/ostracize_your_family/?st=IZLSNHU3&sh=1920f825
/r/MensRights25/02/17 10:12 PM
7

http://thinkaboutnow.com/2016/03/3-wayscorporationsprofitoffbaby-foreskin14/
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:44 AM
1

Did...um... did a grown woman just tell other grown women to go to their parents and demand equal back allowance from them? Is that what I just saw in the first 20 seconds? Does she go on to say "just kidding! Who the Fuck do we think we are, demanding anything from our parents who spent somewhere between 500k and a million bucks raising us, no matter how much more or less our brothers got?"
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:36 AM
1

While some of these women are awaiting trial and some don't specifically state the amount of prison time they got, any man in this situation would have gotten at least 10 years in prison. Most of the women on this list got probation.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 06:53 PM
1

There is a heavily political sub, r/Wayofthe bern. It's full of TRUE leftists- progressives who have disengaged from mass media in the US/Britain. Because THAT is what has your family by the balls. It will give you some hope to head to that sub and look around, because there is a ever-growing rift among the true left, which are the people who just want good things for oppressed people---all of them, and the hard left, which is your programmed family. The Point you made about intensity is absolut…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:21 PM
2

This makes my blood boil. Always with the excuse/insult one-two punch. "People are different depending on mood, you should learn that in high school." Literally zero self awareness. This is all at least partially due to us being told again and again that we have to be against each other, that we are so different, and that one of us is "oppressing" the other.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:27 PM
3

That's horrifying. Brave man.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:22 PM
2

Also woman, aged 43. Ive been spending Some time on r/. CreepyPMs and r / niceguys, and to be fair, some of the guys are absolute asses (the ones who call a girl a fat cunt just for rejecting him come to mind). But the women, oh the ever suffering women and their comments. The man is never EVER EVER right, and when you make a point suggesting he is, they brigade and fight, and argue and they never stop arguing first. Ever. They'll resort to PMs and reporting you, anything to not hear what they d…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:51 PM
1

Dear Reader: This answer alone is all you need to read to know that this redditor has no idea what Ockham's Razor is, or that it's a fallacy, and that he will angrily bully anyone who questions him about it. Then, when asked to support his uneducated claims, he will suddenly "lose interest" in the discussion. For your reading pleasure, I present Mr JP, who got owned here, and instead of simply ceasing to respond, continues to answer posts about which he claims to have stopped caring long ago. An…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 10:14 AM
1

We get it! You only care until you're proven full of it- and then you stop caring, over and over.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 09:54 AM
1

And we're back to you responding with "I don't care" posts IMMEDIATELY.... but supporting your views? Not so much.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 05:46 PM
1

Lol, here's a shortened version: You look so foolish, being proven wrong and won't admit it. Why, you care so little, you respond every time!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 05:44 PM
1

Huh, you "stopped caring" then? And you're not concerned that anyone reading this will assume you're not answering because you can't? Because you haven't "stopped caring" about taking jabs at me. Anyone reading this would respect you more if you admitted your error, but that doesn't seem likely. So, what has been learned here? 1) Ockham's Razor is a fallacy, and 2) acting belligerent is not a substitute for factual debate. Seriously dude, it's not that big a deal being wrong- it's the condescend…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 05:11 PM
1

You've answered every post I've written on this thread within an hour or less. It's been almost 24 hours. Am I to understand that means you cannot defend your position? Or are you just still thinking about it?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 09:45 AM
1

Fair enough, you did make it clear you didn't care that you are wrong. So let's just get to the part where you explain why you're right, shall we? I think the best way to proceed is that you explain why Ockham's Razor is a useful theory, including examples of research supporting it, with a focus on how useful it is in explaining human behavior. The next step would be you explaining why the theory applies to your specific assumption, since we have established that "cross disciplinary usage" is no…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/17 03:48 PM
1

Ok, then, let's keep going, because it's funny watching you rephrase each statement I make and saying it back to me, as if people cannot read and immediately see that is what you're doing. Also, nice try on the "the last word" attempt to no longer have to defend your position, but since my points are correct, and since you insist on behaving so aggressively (while still being so wrong), I really don't have a problem seeing this conversation through til it's finished and one of us has decided we …
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 09:42 PM
1

Lol, I think it would be best for you to read the article. Otherwise you are just making yourself look sillier and less informed all the time. Maybe think of it this way: It's a a "cross disciplinary usage" of math to illustrate your misunderstanding of the theory. Or we can keep up this back and forth, and I can post more things that show that your assumption isn't correct. It's fun, especially when you are angry and insulting to people who actually do understand Ockham's Razor and its limitati…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 05:41 PM
2

If you go to the wiki, it was always spelled Ockham: that is the spelling of the last name of the person who suggested the theory. I quite purposely did not spell it your way. But by all means, keep going. It's fun watching you dig deeper and deeper without actually knowing the theory, and pointing out inaccurate suggestions surrounding it. And I read your "cross disciplinary methodology" comment to others. I think it's meant to sound scary smart. It's not. Here are two excellent articles that e…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 05:27 PM
1

Not PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 05:17 PM
1

Also, McDonald's had had many complaints through the years, and her burns were extreme. This was a case of endless corporate money failing to take responsibility.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 05:15 PM
1

Respectfully, I'd like to point out from your answers that you don't really want any answers to your question- you want to suck people Into stating their thoughts so that you can share yours. I actually agree with your original point. But it's important you are aware the government subsidizes health care in many ways, but doesn't get a say in the choices made. The ACA forces people to buy private insurance or pay a $700 penalty, but still doesn't tell you what treatments you must get if you have…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 04:04 PM
1

So all the mods jumped right on board with no discussion as to "why are we doing this?" Just sounds fun to everyone right away!? Huh. I can't think of any group of two or more people who would so quickly and easily agree to a scheme that could potentially cause problems with thousands of people.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 03:54 PM
3

In what world did every mod jump in and agree without any discussion of the plan? Like, I don't know, maybe, why the fuck would we want to do this?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 03:42 PM
1

Ockham's Razor suggests simpler theories are preferable to more complex ones because they are more testable. Can't wait to hear how you're going to set up your experiment. Whether you're right or wrong about the reason for the subreddit drama, it simply doesn't apply here.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 03:35 PM
4

It really is. What I don't get is why there are all these attempts at censorship. Ideas don't go away just because people object to the ideas. What that means is- if a person is behaving poorly because they KNOW that there will be no consequences (due to being a woman), then there will be victims and bystanders who have opinions about it. This is the outlet for those opinions. To suggest that those opinions should not be aired in any forum, this one included, is the antithesis of free speech. Th…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 01:44 PM
7

This was a possibly a filmed scene for a reality tv show. This woman claims she thought she was making a reality TV special. She has won a retrial. I don't know what the facts are and don't purport to. http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-dalia-dippolito-december-trial-date-20160919-story.html
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 03:02 AM
0

The guy is a good guy, sure. What makes me want to vomit is how much credit he's given for acting the way he's supposed to. Has it really come to this? We give a man extra special credit for doing what he's supposed to in his life? Plus, what if this was a woman? Everybody'd find something wrong wth her behavior bc of the intense standard for mothers, and the rock bottom, minimum one for fathers.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/16 07:13 PM
1

Let me just go ahead and call you a child because I have no good argument for your point.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/16 12:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter