TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

United_Donkey8368 Archive

View 0 posts and 263 comments by United_Donkey8368 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

But you say "deformed," and it’s not deformed; it simply develops differently. Also, it’s not that we start as women. What is true is that all human embryos develop with basic "neutral" sexual structures that, by default, resemble female ones in the first few weeks. Around the first 6 weeks, the embryo has structures that could develop into ovaries or testes, and sexual organs that are initially similar in appearance to the clitoris and vulva. From weeks 7-8, if the embryo has a Y chromosome, te…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:05 AM
–

Some woman money, some woman validation from goodlooking guy, and other woman atention from a goodlooking guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 03:20 PM
7

These stories are made because women want something like that. I mean, yeah. How is that even surprising?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 12:13 AM
3

The same thing happens to men with porn. Edit: I didn’t realize you were referring to the porn part, I replied without finishing reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 12:06 AM
1

And they assume that their “lukewarm appreciation” (or even yours, based on how you’ve described it so far) is even remotely similar to what men feel. Explain it better to me, what is it like for you man? Because all of this is making me curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 03:29 PM
1

When I say “I don’t like it,” I obviously mean it doesn’t arouse me, it doesn’t turn me on, and things like that. The problem is that the women you’re trying to debate with, if you put it that way, don’t understand “doesn’t arouse you” or “doesn’t turn me on”; they understand it as “don’t like it,” and they don’t agree with that. I’m not sure if I’m making myself clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 02:10 PM
1

In my case, attraction to a “Chad” also comes from him desiring me, in addition to the fact that he’s a “Chad.” In other words, I want a "Chad" because I want him to desire me, and because he’s tall and strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 01:29 PM
1

Exactly, women don’t like the male body or male physicality at all, only when it boosts their ego. I wouldn’t use the phrase “don’t like the male body,” because you can really like the male body and still not be physically aroused by it. If you use that in your arguments, it’s easy to refute, because in my case it’s not that I don’t like the male body, it’s that, by itself, it doesn’t arouse me. It makes It look like we hate man. So by saying “you don’t like the male body,” you create confusion …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 01:18 PM
1

It doesn’t work like that, it’s more complicated. Otherwise, women wouldn’t be dating handsome, muscular, or tall guys, for example. Handsome guys are attractive partly because of their nice faces, not because their face alone is arousing, but you also want them to desire you. Tall guys and muscular guys give off protective vibes, which is why we like them, but there’s also the part about wanting them to desire us to get aroused. It’s all together — the fact that he desires us alone is irrelevan…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 01:02 PM
1

They use them. And they use sexo doll too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:28 AM
1

When we say that, we’re really referring to the fact that we’re not physically aroused just by looking at a man’s body alone and without any sexual context. But we do find men we like sexy as a whole, not just because of their physical appearance. It also depends on the context they’re in — it’s not the same to see a man you like on the street or in a non-sexual situation (there’s nothing arousing about that) as it is to see him, for example, close to someone in a passionate context. Being arous…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:24 AM
2

At least I never see a man’s body as an object of desire, but I do find him sexy overall, with the whole combination of body and personality. It’s not that his body alone triggers physical arousal or anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:18 AM
1

No, one of the most viewed categories by men is MILF and mature.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:13 AM
–

we also know what kind of porn women prefer, and as it turns out, ya’ll are goofy ass degenerates just like men. The most watched porn by women is lesbian porn, what’s so degenerate about that? And most man wach corn, more than woman. Ya’ll straight up just don’t like the thought of your man jacking off to other women. No, what bothers us is when our partner does it; what some random person does is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:46 PM
2

An important meta-analysis published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Mitricheva et al., 2019 - 61 fMRI studies covering 1,850 individuals) found that the brain circuits activated by visual sexual stimuli are independent of biological sex (PNAS). Scientific American ... That study basically says that when you look at which brain areas are activated by visual sexual stimuli, men and women use very similar circuits. And that is true, but that does not mean they are activated wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:00 PM
1

No, in my specific case, nobody wakes me up “on fire” because for me it’s more emotional. The act itself doesn’t appeal to me, unless it’s for validation and attention from a steady partner; otherwise, no way.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:27 AM
1

No in my case
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:47 AM
1

Even with that 5% of men, foreplay is needed to reach proper physical arousal/lubricated. You can’t just go and think, “I’m part of the 5%, she’s already aroused, let’s do it.” Physical and mental arousal are different. She can feel mentally attracted to you and care about you, but still have no physical/genital arousal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:35 AM
3

This is true in my case. For example, my cousin (a man) gets turned on by seeing a curvy woman in a tight dress on the street or on social media, but that has never happened to me with a stranger, no matter how handsome or muscular he is. However, a guy like that can attract me in the first way you mentioned, although sometimes I joke or exaggerate my attraction by showing it to my friends as if it were the second type of attraction you described—but it’s more of a joke or exaggeration. On the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:26 AM
0

I know, I was being sarcastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:08 PM
-1

One of the ways to do that is to lower testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 06:40 PM
–

She isn’t saying that women aren’t interested in dating men romantically or emotionally, but it’s true that if you understand how hormones (like testosterone) work, or how the brain responds (hypothalamus, amygdala, ...), you realize that there are quite a few differences in how desire works in most men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 07:40 PM
–

They think we feel the same urge to want to have sex just from seeing their bodies as they do. That idea falls apart once you study how the sexual desire circuits work, testosterone, the hypothalamus, the amygdala, and the differences in responses between men and women to these. The big difference is testosterone acting on these systems.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 07:37 PM
–

So you’re asexual then. No. If you analyze it from a purely physiological and hormonal perspective, men generally have a higher sex drive and stronger sexual motivation than women.And this is due to testosterone. So what might be very important to you may not be as important to the average woman to the same degree. Saying that is like claiming that most women in the world are asexual, and that’s simply not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 07:15 PM
–

Most studies have shown that sex is pleasurable for women, but for men it is a genuine and intense desire. This is due to testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 06:56 PM
5

I didn’t believe any part of the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 06:33 PM
-2

If you think most women, or even half of women, would support a guy financially, you’re mistaken. Those girls who do that are exceptions. Just don’t date those women. Anyway, I don’t believe the story you told. It’s the typical story every redpiller claims has “happened” to them — a cliché story they all repeat. It’s very funny how all these guys know someone like that and they all have the same story. Even my friends complain when someone uses them. Also, how do you know everything your friend …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 06:30 PM
5

No. Personally, I don’t think people should criticize how other people’s sexuality works if it doesn’t harm anyone. My point was only to explain that there are biological differences in how men and women tend to experience sexual attraction, partly due to hormones. But that wasn’t meant as an argument criticize anyone’s sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 08:20 PM
–

I’m not talking about myself personally, I’m talking about people on social media, and those women who call men “gay” when those men have standards that they themselves don’t fit. So they use “gay” as an insult to imply that maybe he should look for men instead. What I’m saying is that people use insults they think will offend the other person, even if they themselves don’t consider it an insult. After all, would you insult someone with something that you know doesn’t offend them? At what point …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 05:28 PM
3

Instead, women masturbate to men who desire them. I don’t know any woman who does that, and I don’t do that either. As far as I know, the most watched porn is lesbian. I would say that a woman’s arousal toward a man comes more from the context and the relationship between the two of them, or from what she creates in her fantasy, not so much from the body itself. In other words, I only feel aroused if a man I have some affection for is close to me and touches me; otherwise I don’t get aroused.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 05:25 PM
7

This is due to hormonal and neurochemical reasons; it’s not something women choose. Testosterone is what makes men become aroused just by seeing a woman’s body and desire it, and they have about 10 to 20 times more of it than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 05:22 PM
–

I think you’re not understanding what I mean. The people who use “gay” or “freckled” as an insult don’t necessarily think those things are actually bad, but they use them that way because they know it offends the other person.My friend even draws freckles on with makeup sometimes. The ones who use “virgin” in an argument do it because, at some level, they think it’s bad for a man to be a virgin. No. If those women thought those men wouldn’t be offended by being virgins, they wouldn’t use it as a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 10:52 PM
–

What I’m trying to explain is that even if you personally don’t think something is bad, if you know the other person considers it bad, people will use it as an insult. I don’t use the word “gay” as an insult, I just know that on social media people do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 10:45 PM
2

Well, I have a friend who gets freckles from the sun. Once she got into a fight with another girl at school who used makeup to hide her freckles, and my friend called her “freckled” even though she herself likes her freckles in the summer and doesn’t wear makeup on purpose. She used it as an insult because she saw it as an insecurity for the other girl. The same happens with glasses. Wearing glasses is neutral. Most people don’t care and it’s not an insult. But some people call someone “four eye…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:21 PM
0

I know it’s not about level, but women on the internet would call a guy an “incel” if he uploaded a video saying a girl was dirty or a slut in class. Well, at least on TikTok it happens. What I’m getting at is that in my daily life outside the internet, I don’t hear women talking like that, even though it’s seen online all the time. The point is, I don’t think those women consider being a virgin bad; what they consider bad is the attitude some incels have online. That’s why those women use the t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 04:00 PM
2

What I mean is that when I talk with my friends, we never use any of that to speak badly about a guy. For example, if a guy has been overly perverted in class with one of us or something like that, the insults are usually more like calling him an “idiot” or "dicked"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 03:28 PM
6

Trying to insult men by calling them “incels” or “virgins” is something that only happens on the internet. In my daily life I’ve never seen or heard that. Also, many women use this as an insult not because they personally think it’s bad, but because they know it offends those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 02:28 PM
1

What I’m giving is my point of view, and I think most of the women in his videos are like women on dating apps — they just want validation and attention. As a woman, and seeing how they overact, that’s what I think. Also, on those apps they may find him attractive, but not enough to meet up with him or be interested in continuing the conversation, much less to act like the women in his videos.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 04:07 PM
1

I’m referring to the whole video, exactly what you just mentioned. It’s as if it were about attention and validation, but it doesn’t lead to anything; it’s like they don’t actually like him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 03:42 PM
4

Most of his videos seem staged; it’s as if the girl only wants his attention but doesn’t actually like him. I also think this has to do with his fame, because before he became famous he uploaded a video complaining about dating apps and about women not wanting him. https://youtu.be/GWmOLD8UIDE?si=jy29BR0cGYVSEFDz Additionally, arousal in women does not work the same way as in men. A man being attractive is not enough to make you wet; this has to do with hormonal and neurochemical factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 01:48 PM
5

I have never gotten aroused just by looking at a man, no matter if he's an actor or a regular guy on the street. This is normal in women. The difference with men is mainly due to: Testosterone (10 to 20 times higher in men → rapid activation of sexual desire and sexual motivation) Estrogen (modulates the female response, more dependent on context but does not trigger desire or sexual motivation directly. It doesn’t make you “want sex” on its own.) That’s why women can become physically aroused b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 01:56 PM
7

No, rich man have vibrators.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 01:22 PM
2

I don’t know what this has to do with what I said. But a large penis matters more to a man than to a woman; the penis doesn’t even make most women orgasm. A large penis is not something I think has much to do with women. I believe porn has created an idea of what women desire. And clearly, porn is not real. Some women might fetishize it, but most women do not. The most watched porn among women is lesbian porn, where a penis isn’t even needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 04:38 PM
0

I’m not saying they don’t feel attraction, but it is minimal and not enough to motivate sex. Also, what we mostly feel is relational and emotional attraction. It’s not that we use men for their money or anything like that, it’s that the goals are different. If you notice, most casual relationships end up becoming long-term relationships. That’s why a one-night stand (ONS) is not of interest, because it generally doesn’t lead to what you want. However, casual sex, such as friends with benefits, c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 03:14 PM
1

A Reddit post proves nothing. And that doesn’t mean they felt as attracted to the man in the same way a man does. You can also see posts on Reddit or Quora where women are asked what they feel when they see a shirtless man or whether seeing men arouses them, and most say no. There are also more studies that say most women do not have the same motivations as men for having sex, that women have less sexual desire, and that much of that desire comes from relational attraction or a desire for emotio…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 03:10 PM
1

Bueno la mayoría de mujeres no te van a decir "no me excita ver cuerpos de hombres". Pero hay estadísticas que dicen que las mujeres ven más porno lésbico, y mujeres que se quejan de que las sexualizan. Y no es una minoría. La excitación hacia el cuerpo de un hombre es mínima e incluso una puede no sentir la sensación. .
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:57 PM
1

What are you trying to say with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:31 AM
0

Estaba hablando de sexo causal, pero no lees obviamente ya me lo has demostrado varias veces en otros contrarios. Las motivaciones para el sexo son diferentes en hombres y en mujeres, eso es lo que trato de decir.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:55 AM
1

No, destruyó el tuyo por completo. Como explicas que cuando un hombre transiciona, empieza a querer tener sexo con muchísimo intensidad con personas que no conoce y que antes no le pasaba cusndo era mujer. O las mujeres que se ponen tetoterona para el gimnasio, sinhen más deseo sexual. Y los hombres tienen 10 a 20 veces aproximadamente más de esta hormona que las mujeres. ¿Lo leíste siquiera? Sus hallazgos fueron que las mujeres sí se excitan sexualmente de forma objetiva y subjetiva, solo que m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:39 PM
0

The thing is, they do register it as something that physically excites them. They don't register it as arousal. Haven't you read the study? They register it as sexually relevant, or as something they find sexual, but it doesn't genitally excite them, nor do they want sex. Your entire argument is "women can't be physically aroused by men," which is not only absurd, but also has thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of years of evolutionary biology to refute that. No, the study perfectly refutes …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:13 PM
0

Are you seriously arguing that women aren't aroused by a man's physical qualities? No, it's more complex than that, but it's not men's physical qualities that are arousing. So, a shirtless, muscular guy registers in a woman's brain the same way as a white wall? This doesn't make sense. It does make sense, and that's how it works for most women due to testosterone. We might register it as aesthetically pleasing, but there's no physical arousal. Where did you get this idea? So, women are asexual l…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:57 PM
1

I'm not talking about minorities; most women aren't aroused by men. Thinking that most women sexualize men is just trying to understand the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:51 AM
–

It's not that women stop wanting sex altogether. It's simply that the drive itself is inherently much lower than a man's. It doesn't mean he can't continue caring for or loving her, but simply not have her as his wife. This isn't even my point, it's not what I'm discussing anyway. I'm just explaining certain behaviors that are observed. But if your wife isn't pleasing you, then it's your business whether to stay or not; I'm not getting involved in that. But it doesn't make sense that it's not tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 11:29 PM
–

The thing is, the main reason a woman enters a relationship is for security and emotional connection, while the reason men do so is for sex and companionship. Men have a higher sex drive and want sex more than women, which means that in relationships, women tend to have sex even when they don't feel like it. It's also harder for women to reach orgasm during sex than it is for men. Furthermore, sex is more burdensome for a woman compared to the benefits, so it's normal for a woman to see it as so…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 11:14 PM
1

I'm so pissed off. Guys who say they want a woman who does more for them than the women from their past, they get torn to shreds here. What are you talking about? I mean, you want your current girlfriend to do more for you than your ex-girlfriend did? I'm not talking about that, I'm saying I want him to do more for me than he did for his ex-girlfriend. Well, or at least as much as he did for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:52 PM
2

You don't understand anything. I'm talking about arousal, physical, genital arousal. Just because a woman pays attention to a handsome man doesn't mean she wants sex. We've already talked about this. A handsome man doesn't excite or create sexual desire simply by being handsome. I think you haven't understood the part about testosterone. Many times those women just want his validation and attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:55 PM
2

No, looks don't excite. What excites a woman is foreplay, kissing... If you reach that point through looks, it's something the woman decides, not arousal. So no, looks don't determine whether someone will be aroused. If a man is unattractive but a woman falls in love with him and they have a connection, he can still arouse her if they engage in foreplay.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:46 PM
2

This isn't a personal opinion. It's a scientifically proven fact. A man's physique and body don't excite women, which is why most women don't watch porn, and those who do watch lesbian porn. A man can often experience genital arousal just by watching a video of a woman dancing in a bikini; the same can't be said for most women. Furthermore, women who seek out handsome men generally do so out of a desire for validation. That's why some women on dating apps never meet up with men or are only there…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 03:58 PM
7

Not really, the idea that he's never had a girlfriend is an unrealistic standard. But I want a man who does more for me than he did for his past girlfriends, who values ​​me more, loves me more, introduces me to his parents, and all that. I mean, I want it to be clear that he values ​​me more, not sexually, but in other ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 12:24 PM
6

Commitment and having a history.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 11:57 AM
–

We're not in a relationship either if the woman doesn't get what she wants from that relationship; for men, it's seen as sex, so it's still a transaction because you'll owe her if she stops having it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 10:06 AM
–

Of course you can have sex on your own, there's masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 10:05 AM
–

Furthermore, for God's sake, I beg you to stop infantilizing women for two seconds, treating them like cannon fodder for your terrible arguments, please. Women. Like. Sex. Too. Women. Get. Aroused. Too. Do you understand? That doesn't change the fact that men want more sex and desire it more, and that women do it in relationships even when they don't feel like it. Besides, female and male arousal are different. From what I see, for a man, arousal comes from seeing a woman's body and getting an e…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 10:03 AM
–

We're not talking about forcing the woman; we're talking about something that happens in all relationships, since men have a higher sex drive than women and sex is more satisfying for them. So they want it more and get angry or sad if you don't give it to them. The point is, nobody is forcing anyone; it's simply that the man wants it more, and if the woman doesn't reciprocate and eventually doesn't want it anymore, then this is also a transaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:58 AM
–

No, sex isn't mutually beneficial for both partners; it's only beneficial if it's done right. It's harder for women to have orgasms, there's a higher risk of STIs and pregnancy, and men want it more than women do. So women do it even if they don't feel like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:53 AM
–

It's not real in men either, it's just lust based on your comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:50 AM
–

What are you saying? Don't you know what love is? Wanting to be with someone, supporting them. You can find it yourself. Clearly, if you don't understand this, you're only in a relationship for lust and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:48 AM
–

The fact that they are different sexes doesn't change the fact that you, as a man, are with a woman for the benefit she provides you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:46 AM
–

Doing things for your girlfriend is also a key part of the relationship. And when it comes to sex, men are the ones who benefit the most; they're the ones who have the most orgasms, and women are the ones who do things for them that they don't want to do. The point is that in a relationship, both men and women have something to contribute, but you only seem to think the man's role is fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:43 AM
–

Just as a woman might have sex with a man as part of an agreement, a man also has to fulfill his part of the agreement, whatever the woman decides. But for you, that's "not loving." Being with a woman just for sex is definitely not love.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:40 AM
–

Men do use women, their bodies. And they're the ones who use women the most for what they do for them, like giving blowjobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:27 AM
2

It's nowhere near as pleasurable for women as it is for men. Men benefit the most, and it has nothing to do with culture; it's simply that it's biologically easier for men to have an orgasm and experience pleasure through this act, and they have a greater desire to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:50 AM
1

I only mentioned it because others were mentioning it, and it seemed like you were too. It's a factor, but it still evokes the same attraction as a popular but unattractive man. It's not different; the attraction of the famously unattractive man isn't negotiated. Both in this case are about validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:22 AM
1

The belief that attraction can be negotiated by giving more attention/validation/paying, etc. But anyway, the type of attraction both men create is the same. Neither the handsome one nor the less handsome one awakened sexual desire in her just by seeing him. In other words, you have to get to know both of them for the woman to let them get there. What I mean is that it's not a desire like men have. She'll generally be with handsome men for the validation they give, not because she feels like hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:03 AM
1

It's just the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 12:52 AM
2

What does that have to do with what I said? Women don't get aroused by seeing men; men do, and they get aroused by seeing women. Besides, women have less sex drive than men. Generally, women have "casual sex" to have a long-term relationship with the guy; most women don't do ONS, it's not that common.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 12:52 AM
6

We're not saying it's a threat. But I think more women are realizing that sex isn't worth it, which is why this generation is having the least sex. Women in the past did it to be able to live well; women now either do it for validation and attention, or they don't do it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:11 PM
1

The third group consists of women who also realized that the guy they took an Uber for at 11 PM across town to suck his dick... I highly doubt most women actually do that; that's more of a porn thing. Women on dating apps are often just there for attention, and even if they match with men, they don't actually end up seeing them. Or they're women trying to sell their OF (presumably a slang term for sex appeal).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:32 PM
0

Most women have casual sex to feel validated or for attention, not out of sexual desire or a desire for variety. Sleeping with a handsome man isn't because he's handsome and she felt genital arousal; it's because he's handsome and if I get attention, I'm beautiful too. That's why many women don't have casual sex, because they realize that men do it out of genuine sexual need, not because you're the best or the most beautiful. Besides, casual sex for women is often bad sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:26 PM
1

Women go out, they get tempted, it's normal. You keep talking as if women are like men. Men are the only ones who get tempted because men are the only ones who get aroused by seeing a woman's body. When a woman is unfaithful, there are many factors involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:19 PM
1

No, women don't cheat in the same way men do. I'm not saying they don't cheat, but men do it purely out of sexual attraction and desire for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:17 PM
0

No, that's how a man experiences it. A woman's sexual desire isn't the same as a man's. A man's is visual; he sees an attractive woman and gets aroused. A woman's is all about physical sensations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:13 PM
3

Because we women generally don't feel sexual attraction in the same way that men do, it's not that we don't want to admit it, it's that it doesn't make sense to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:12 PM
0

If it is conditioned by something else, most women do not have casual sex for the same reasons that men do (i.e., sexual desire), but rather for contextual, psychological reasons (seeking attention, validation), for money and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:04 PM
0

Women don't feel genital desire for men just by seeing them; it's more complex than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:33 PM
1

The same goes for casual sex, at least the emotional aspect. A woman's sexual desire isn't triggered by just a man's body; it doesn't work that way. The man always has to do something first to make her interested enough to reach a sexual situation. I think men don't understand this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:27 PM
-1

The thing is, generally speaking, a man will always have to offer a woman some kind of commitment, even if it's just casual sex. A man will have to make up a story for the woman because most women don't go out with men just for sex, since we don't have that much of a libido, and generally, sex is bad anyway. Men still pay for drinks and have to give women validation and attention for a woman to even consider sleeping with him. Female and male sexual desire isn't the same in most cases; women don…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:16 PM
1

It doesn't work that way for women. Men have more desire and libido, women don't, and many women have casual sex or friends with benefits to get a long-term relationship, not because of sexual desire itself. On the other hand, what motivates women to be interested in a man isn't physical attraction. Women first feel relational attraction, which isn't sexual. What activates sexual attraction is foreplay, kissing, and any man can do this if you let him go that far. In this case, you let both the "…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:10 PM
–

Due to relational-affective attraction, they basically want your time, validation, to spend affectionate time with you and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 07:02 PM
–

Most women don't even get aroused by looking at men, it's something I always say, but they don't seem to understand, a woman just looking at a handsome man will not get aroused.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 06:14 PM
1

I already edited my comment and added a few things, read it again. That way you can change your comment based on what I added too. I repeat, they're showing their desire for a romantic relationship in a masculine way. I really wouldn't want to be put in a room with that random guy in real life. Do I even need to explain that? It's like a man saying: I want her to kill me by suffocating me in her breasts. 4chan, what is that? And you know what? They wouldn't do any of this in real life. Or at lea…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:53 AM
2

What I'm telling you is scientifically proven. Women don't experience genital arousal from a body; we get excited by direct physical stimulation or foreplay. There are also women who get aroused without wanting sex; it's simply a tingling sensation in your body that makes you want to give them an orgasm, but it's not directed at a specific stimulus. And there are also women who get aroused and lubricated, but they aren't aware of that arousal; that is, they don't feel like touching themselves or…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:39 AM
1

Because they want that, a narrative with him, a romantic story; they want him to like them, they want the handsome man to consider them beautiful, they want a relationship, but they can't achieve it with him. Why don't they lower their standards of appearance if they don't care about status, aesthetic appeal, romantic fantasies, validation, etc.? Because women today are encouraged to raise them. Before, to attract a woman, you simply had to meet her emotional needs. Now, you have to be incredibl…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:29 PM
1

No, that's the male interpretation. In reality, what those women mostly feel is a desire for validation, romantic fantasy, aesthetic attraction, status ("this guy elevates me"). It's not that they see him and feel a genital tingle and want sex as an impulse; that's more of a male sexuality thing. In women, this attraction is more about, "I want him to choose me," "I want him to love me," "I want him to look at me like that." Women in general don't feel desire just from seeing a handsome man. To …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:17 PM
2

We don't generally do it, or rather, not in the same way as a man. I can watch a video of a handsome man in a swimsuit and that's all it is; a man, on the other hand, will get aroused and want sex, and it seems that for them that's "love."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 01:37 PM
2

That's unrelated, but it's a fact that they are the ones who sexualize the group of women, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 01:32 PM
13

Men are the ones who mostly do that; when they say "I love you," they're really saying "I desire you" as a sexual object. When women say "I love you," they say "I love you" like when you love your friends, but on a deeper level, not objectified. That's why it bothers so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 01:27 PM
22

They think we think like them, that they want to use our bodies, it's not a compliment, nor is it love.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 10:50 AM
1

The latter seems like an inherently more honest sign than the former. Yes, I agree with that, the first one could be made up. Sometimes I get turned on out of nowhere, and sometimes I masturbate and the itch goes away. Generally, women feel this way; it's without sexualizing anything, without seeing anything subjectively exciting, and it's not a desire to have sex with a man. What is "relational-affective attraction"? A celebrity crush sounds like it should be "relational attraction," why is it …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 10:37 PM
1

Don't worry, I know some men struggle to understand this because it's so different from their own experience. At first, I had trouble understanding why men wanted sex just from seeing a woman's butt; it was something that completely went against my perception. That seems very counterintuitive to me. How could conscious expression be more informative than unconscious/subconscious expression? The former can be faked, and the latter cannot. I'm not sure I understood the question correctly, but if t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:31 PM
3

The problem is viewing it from a somewhat male perspective. What the study DOESN'T say is that women don't know what they feel or that they aren't reliable narrators of their own attraction. The discrepancy is between genital response and subjective experience, not between what they say and their "actual feelings." In women, genital arousal is largely automatic and reflexive, and doesn't reliably indicate desire, attraction, or readiness. That's why researchers emphasize that genital response sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:52 PM
2

https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-internacional-andrologia-262-articulo-relacion-entre-excitacion-sexual-subjetiva-S1698031X18300220 "In women, the photoplethysmograph uses infrared light and a light detector to assess changes in opacity in the vaginal epithelium, allowing the recording of blood volume and pulse amplitude.5 Subjective sexual arousal, on the other hand, refers to the affective-cognitive experience of physiological arousal, that is, the perception of arousal at a psycholo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:22 PM
1

Because she has a relationship with you and you matter to her emotionally, that's why she generally chooses you over the vibrator. I think women's libido, especially, has a lot to do with their desire for a man. Many women I've spoken to describe themselves as almost asexual unless there's a particular man in their life they're attracted to. No, women's libido works from within; it doesn't usually have to do with the man. What does have to do with the man is what he does well, and she chooses hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:14 PM
1

It's just proof that she's attracted to you and you meet her requirements, so she wants to meet yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:09 PM
2

Most women are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:08 PM
1

Most women have sex with a man without initially wanting it; even so-called "Chads" are not initially desired; there is only relational attraction towards them, which is far from sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:07 PM
2

You're asking for things that don't stem intrinsically from female sexuality, but rather from male sexuality. So, if an average woman does that, know that she's mostly just faking it because you told her to; it doesn't demonstrate any sexual attraction. Sexual arousal and the desire for intimacy in women develop gradually; it's not automatic or unconscious like in men, it's conscious.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:00 PM
1

You're the ones expecting sex from that date, not us. Men, in general, aren't really interested in women; we're simply a means to a (sexual) end for them. So why should women have to provide sex first?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:54 AM
2

In women it's generally not like that; our initial goal is to have a committed relationship with every man we're interested in, but they don't commit and that's where we have to give them sex because otherwise they won't stay. Our initial attraction is not usually about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:47 AM
0

You yourself say that she has to have the same reactions with different men, even if they meet different requirements or are completely different. Women also learn from past experiences, and if, knowing that having sex with someone before resulted in less commitment, then this time she's clearly going to take her time, and it could be a man just like the first one, but this one is going to have to wait longer. It's like if I, as a woman, tried to get a man to do the same thing with me as he did …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:40 AM
3

The woman's goal isn't sex with either of them, but one met her requirements for her attraction and the other didn't; it has nothing to do with one arousing her more than the other. If the woman found the second type unattractive, she simply wouldn't date him. In any case, if she has a requirement for a relationship that is "he has to be handsome," clearly if the other man doesn't meet that requirement, he'll have to meet other requirements that he has to demonstrate (his personality). A man bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:36 AM
3

Most women aren't sexually aroused by handsome men. Female sexual arousal and attraction don't work the same way as male sexual attraction; the first mistake people make is confusing or comparing them. A woman's attraction to a man is actually more complex, and in most cases, regardless of how the man looks, he has to do something to make her feel attracted. Women don't develop sexual desire for someone out of thin air the way men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:23 AM
2

Anyway, it will never be the same or even close to a man; testosterone makes almost all the difference, and evolutionary aspects also play a role.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 03:29 AM
1

It's not the only truth, but most women do behave this way, and I'm only talking about a world without morals, romance, or anything like that—in other words, if we were animals. Or if romantic love hadn't been invented throughout history. So, most women don't have a real desire for sex, or arousal towards a person. They do it, yes, but the experience of arousal and sexual attraction is different for men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:25 AM
1

We're talking about having less sexual desire; the time you spend doing it doesn't measure that, since women take longer to reach orgasm, so it makes sense to make it last longer; otherwise, it would be the same amount of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 10:36 AM
1

Encouraging women to do that doesn't mean most of those women want to. Besides, they might also be encouraging masturbation or sex toys. The orgasm gap doesn't make sex less enjoyable for women, but it does make it less physically satisfying. They might feel good emotionally if they have sex with a partner, but they aren't physically satisfied until they masturbate. But anyway, if those women do it with sex workers, they'll realize that penetration isn't good and they won't do it again. Or they'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 12:25 AM
5

No, I mean that women can get wet and have physiological arousal without thinking about or wanting anything sexual. It has nothing to do with being horny.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 12:23 AM
2

I don't know, but the statistics say they watch more lesbian porn and search for actresses' names more than actors'. I don't think a good-looking man provokes those reactions either; otherwise, they'd be searching high and low for sexy men, but they don't. In the end, whether he's good-looking or not doesn't change the amount of testosterone or sexual desire that women have.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:35 PM
3

I don't know, but I don't think feeling powerful is 100% for emotional reasons. I think it's 20% that and 80% ejaculation. After all, there's also porn, where men imagine having sex with the woman in the video, and casual sex and all that is just for ejaculation. I don't think they see it as anything more than that. I've heard men say they go to prostitutes just because they want to get their revenge quickly and their wife doesn't want to. Or others say their wife does want to, but they want var…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:31 PM
4

Knowing her, I think so, haha, I mean, she sleeps with him so he'll take her to those places. They have that transactional relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 04:28 PM
4

No, it's a general statement, meaning most women are like that. So, the porn women watch most is lesbian. What I mean is that if a girl is watching TikTok and a shirtless man comes on, she's not going to get turned on, like a man would with a woman. This is obviously a generalization; I know there are women who might.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:44 PM
12

The last one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:35 PM
3

I don't understand what you mean by that. Most women experience more orgasms and pleasure from masturbating than from having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:32 PM
9

But it's known that the reasons women cheat aren't sexual. I mean, my friend cheated on her boyfriend simply because the other guy took her to fun places like amusement park rides, fairs, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:25 PM
4

And female sexuality without restrictions, meaning lesbians are the ones who have the least sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:08 PM
3

That's simply a minority. You're talking about it as if it were a general rule; most women don't use sexual services, even if they're unattractive. And those who do (this is a theory) will stop using them when they realize that sex isn't that pleasurable for women. There IS a testosterona difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:02 PM
1

Women are freaks (in the sense of being perverted or sexually adventurous), they sleep with whomever they want and they don't need a deep connection to do it. Most women aren't like that. For us, it's mostly about emotions. A woman won't get turned on by a man just because; men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:57 PM
5

Quite the opposite is true for women. If morality or ethics didn't exist, most wouldn't have sex, considering it's not very pleasurable for women, and most women aren't visually aroused by men. Even if they are, the physical arousal is either minimal or doesn't lead to a desire for sex. Much of the casual sex women have is driven by other reasons; it's not just a desire for sex or a desire for pleasure or orgasm (since that's not usually the case), and much less sexual desire (for the reasons I …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:54 PM
3

It doesn't work that way for women. Even in the animal world, females demand resources from males to mate, or they demand that males be a certain way to pass on their genes to their offspring, or they demand that males be strong to protect them. So, a woman's desire for sex is on a lesser level than men's. Sex with strangers, as you mentioned, is not usually pleasurable for women, and that's why many regret it. But that's beside the point because there are all kinds of women, but many women who …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:45 PM
7

They definitely see it as both, a physiological need (testosterone) and a need for esteem (masculinity). But the former carries more weight for them, which is why there are brothels and sex work; there's nothing masculine about it, yet they still go. This is something that, as a woman, took me years to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:34 PM
5

I think we women don't really understand how much of a difference there is between the sexual desires of each sex. Many women argue about this because maybe they don't really know the difference and think that a man with a high sex drive is the same as a woman with a high sex drive, when that's not the case. Many women who take testosterone for the gym find that they suddenly start wanting to have sex with people and have a real desire to do so. My friend who wants to bulk up, for example, says …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:29 PM
4

There are studies that prove it; those who don't want to accept it exist, and there are also those who are different and more like men, but they are a very small minority. Every time I mention this, I have a bunch of women trying to explain how "less testosterone doesn't mean less sex drive" hahaha. I suppose those women say that because even if they have low sex drive, they want to please their partner, meaning they'll do it for him. I suppose that's why they say it; they simply see sex drive d…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:21 PM
6

But those desires to have sex when there is no physical arousal tend to be more emotional than sexual, and likewise, women in general do not get aroused mentally or emotionally just by seeing someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:16 PM
12

No, it's more complex with women; you apply it as if we were men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:15 PM
4

It would be the same thing; testosterone doesn't rise for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 12:34 PM
4

No, definitely not. The biological factor would account for 90%, and supply and demand would be about 10%. Changes in supply and demand won't make women feel more aroused, more attracted, or have higher testosterone levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 11:38 AM
18

Yes, I mean feeling aroused, with increased blood flow to the genitals, but not enough to masturbate, much less to have sex. In other words, just because we feel physically aroused doesn't mean we want sex or sexual interaction with the person who "turns us on."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 11:34 AM
15

That's nothing new; women have less testosterone, therefore less sexual desire and less arousal than men. A woman can even feel aroused without realizing it or without wanting to have sex. And it's definitely not a need like food; it's far, far from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 11:20 AM
3

No, even if there were no supply or demand, it would be the same since women have less testosterone than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 11:19 AM
–

Me neither, I've never seen a woman complain about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 10:55 AM
–

The thing is, it's men who feel that strong attraction towards women, not the other way around, so basically, doing it quickly isn't something that's really on our minds. No matter how handsome or sexy a man is, it doesn't really cross our minds during a date. I'm saying this in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 10:53 AM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2024/mar/20/the-japanese-sex-drought-why-are-married-women-so-uninterested-in-making-love? https://www.nippon.com/en/features/h00161/? https://www.hindustantimes.com/sex-and-relationships/half-the-men-who-buy-sex-are-in-a-relationship-or-married-study/story-IjL3AG3Yf8xgWfKDoc0vJJ.html It's funny that men say they are not interested because they are working too much, but then the evidence says that married men are the ones who most frequent brothels or sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 11:55 PM
–

I haven't denied that you have to put in more effort to have casual sex; I've already told you that you also have to convince her because it's not what we're looking for. In the same way that a woman has to convince a man to be in a long-term relationship, and that's why that woman has to do more. What part of this don't you understand? You have to put in more effort to marry a woman that some men slept with without putting in as much effort. Again, no, those who slept with her had to put in mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:08 AM
–

They pay indirectly anyway. Otherwise, the woman wouldn't have any motivation to be there, knowing how many other men will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:58 AM
–

You're going off on a tangent. I'm not talking about requirements, I'm saying that you're saying one can have them and the other can't, just because you don't like them. Women don't like men's requirements either. The reason I say we don't have requirements is that our main goal is a long-term relationship; we're looking for a relationship, not casual sex, generally speaking. The difference lies in what we're looking for, I think. Men look for casual sex and women look for a long-term partner by…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:50 AM
–

How are you going to find that out? Haha. If you have money, you're going to have sex. Don't talk nonsense. Go to a prostitute or tell a woman who's open to them that you're going to give her money and the amount, and that's it. It has to be a woman who's open to them, since many won't accept it if it's not a committed relationship, not with you or anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:19 AM
–

We're not talking about the requirements that are set; we're talking about the fact that men and women can set requirements, and they do, but you're complaining about women. And obviously, what has value for a man won't automatically be what has value for a woman; that's why it's different. Casual sex benefits a man even if it doesn't benefit a woman; marriage benefits a woman, but casual sex doesn't, and the requirements will be based on that. And yes, the man who meets the requirements for mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:17 AM
–

Well, it's the same with women. She fulfills the requirement of casual sex, and that's why you give her casual sex. The other fulfills the requirement of marriage, and that's why you offer her marriage. Knowing that both want marriage and stability, but you don't want to give it to them because they don't give you the same things. Well, with men, she gives sex to the one who fulfills his obligations by giving him money. And she doesn't give sex to the other because he doesn't fulfill his obligat…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 06:36 PM
1

Many women don't even reach orgasm during sex. Most women don't want meaningless sex; for us, sex is an extension of a long-term relationship, which is why you won't find casual sex or friends with benefits. Sex isn't our goal in relationships. Most women aren't interested in sex if they're not going to have a long-term partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 01:28 AM
1

Yes, it's more common than before, but these women don't usually want casual sex. If they don't want a romantic relationship, they tend not to date men at all, and if they do want one, they'll have sex while waiting for a relationship to develop. That said, most women I know don't like casual sex of any kind because it's not beneficial for the vast majority of women, due to the orgasm gap and differences in arousal. Men are aroused by seeing women, women aren't by seeing men. This is a very impo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 04:50 PM
1

There are very few women that age who do that; most will actually want a long-term relationship or no relationship at all with men. I've witnessed both.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 12:03 PM
1

The problem with that is that most women aren't interested in that; a woman's primary interest in a man is romantic, while a man's interest in a woman is sexual. That's why most wouldn't accept it, and those who do are usually women who think they'll later have a long-term relationship with you and that you'll commit to them. My advice is to get a prostitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 12:01 PM
–

But on dating apps there are more men than women, and many of those women are only there to promote their OnlyFans or to get attention; most aren't even there to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 11:53 AM
1

Well, it's the same with women. If a woman sees a man has money, she'll give him sex because she wants the money. If he doesn't have money, then the man will have to give her something in order for her to give him sex. What's the problem with this? It has nothing to do with attraction. If you give her the same amount of money, she'll give you the same as the other man. We're saying we don't want you to lie and say you're more attracted to us when that's obviously not the case because you demand …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 03:54 AM
1

If they're going to give up casual sex, most women aren't. Most want a relationship and expect the man to commit, which almost never happens, as I explained before. Like I said, most women don't choose to have casual sex, but they do want a relationship or something in return, not just sex. We're back to the same point. Vaginal penetration doesn't feel good for most women; many don't even feel anything. This is because, otherwise, childbirth would be too painful. Clitoral stimulation does feel g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 03:48 AM
1

Don't men set different rules for women they consider "wife material" and different rules for women they consider "casual sex"? Because one set is for casual sex and another for marriage, aren't these rules different for each woman? Just because casual sex benefits you doesn't mean it benefits us too. You complain that some women have different rules depending on the man, but you don't see the other side of the coin. You don't want to be in a romantic relationship but rather a casual sex one, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 08:37 PM
1

Because my first language isn't English. Because you're not looking at a representative sample. You're looking for confirmation of your idea. It's called confirmation bias. You're not even counting how many women don't complain or how many men don't pursue you. Besides, nothing you said is related to what you quoted. They can complain all they want, but they do have casual sex, just not with every man. They probably complain because they want more afterward, but hey, they made the bed. Believe m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 08:23 PM
1

Women generally don't leave because to have a romantic relationship with a man, you have to do it. Besides, sex with a partner feels better because your partner cares enough to do it that way, something a casual relationship doesn't offer, and I'm talking about casual relationships. And as I said, it has nothing to do with attraction; it has to do with the manipulation that different men use, whether it's threatening to end the relationship (this almost never works), or using money (this almost …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:39 PM
1

Nope, manipulation and deception are an insignificant minority of the cases I described. So you can't think of a scenario where all those calculations are true? It's simple. The math works very well if you recognize that women go for the minority of men (80-20). If they're common, if not, why do they always come up to me? Why do I see women complaining all the time? Why don't I want that myself, and why doesn't every woman I know want it either? Why is women's biggest complaint that "men only wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:35 PM
1

But anyway, in statistics like Japan or any other country, it's men who complain about that. In Japan, there are many dead dormitories, and it's generally the women's fault, since when romance dies after marriage, they no longer want it, and that's why men go to the red-light district, not women, because it's the women who don't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 12:30 PM
1

I'm not saying they're all lying, but many women, instead of lying, try to accept it as if it doesn't affect them and that it's what they want. For example, my friend was always very sentimental, and when her boyfriend broke up with her, she kept saying that she wanted it to end, when in reality, before it ended, she was going to give him a trip together. Well, the same thing happens to many women with casual sex. They go and do it thinking the man will love them, and then when they get dumped, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 12:22 PM
2

Generally, yes. Also, if you show a man even a little attention, he'll already think you want something with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 05:06 PM
1

No, most people definitely agree with me; I'm not just talking out of my ass. You wouldn't understand because you're a man, period. And yes, it's a daily occurrence for me to see women crying because they weren't taken seriously or didn't get what they wanted, and many of the women in this forum are probably here because they don't understand men's need for sex, because they don't feel it themselves. Or because they're angry with men for what they've done to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 05:03 PM
2

The thing is, he says that male attention is frowned upon but female attention isn't, and I've told him that female attention isn't sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 04:54 PM
1

The reason why female attention isn't creepy is because it's not sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 03:17 PM
1

So, women aren't looking for sex? Oh boy, I have some bad news for you… No, when looking for romantic and platonic relationships, sex is something you have to give to get. Sex is generally not satisfying for most women, and it's not the reason we have romantic relationships. Y no he entendido lo demás que has dicho.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 02:31 PM
1

Furthermore, vaginal penetration doesn't feel good or pleasurable for most women, which makes meaningless or casual sex pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 01:21 PM
2

Yes, I know that there are women who withhold sex to get something.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 12:57 PM
1

Most of the cases you've described involve men manipulating or cheating, and that has nothing to do with attraction. I told you this before, and you keep coming up with the same examples. Even friends-with-benefits relationships involve women waiting for the other person to suggest a romantic relationship, just like when men wait for their female friend, whom they're attracted to, to make a move, but for now, they're just friends. "Dead bedroom" relationships happen because women experience less…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 12:54 PM
1

I don't care if he's not attractive or anything, but if he only offers money and isn't a good person, has no empathy, and just wants to use me, NO.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:24 AM
1

And society pressures women to have sex with men quickly, even though it's not the interest of most women. Sex isn't our goal, not in relationships, not when going out, not on dates. I'm generalizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:21 AM
3

Female animals in general show signs of being in heat through scent and other means; we humans have evolved differently. But that doesn't stop the male from protecting and caring for his mate. For example, the lion has infrequent sex, only a few times a year, and yet he still protects the females and guards his territory.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:19 AM
2

Fortunately, that's not true in my experience. I'm not talking about exceptions. Yes, but personally, I also crave penetration. Most women don't feel pleasure or have orgasms with that, so you're still an exception, and the exception doesn't make the rule. Masturbation and sex aren't even comparable for me. Yes, sometimes I just want a quick orgasm alone, but the longing for my man is always there too. The longing for your man is more romantic and sexual than just sexual; most men long for a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:16 AM
3

You can also see online and in real life a lot of women complaining that men only want sex and that they lie to them to have sex, promising long-term relationships. This is basically a statistic showing how common it is. There are also studies showing that women regret casual sex, precisely for the reason I mentioned before: it's simply a man giving the woman the illusion of something she's going to receive and then using her for sex. The next time she complains, and they tell her that not all m…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:04 AM
3

Neither men nor women are monolithic, but you, as a man, know that most straight men want sex with women; I, as a woman, know that sex isn't the goal for most women. Just as you know the first statement, I know the second.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 10:35 AM
1

The thing is, that kind of arousal isn't comparable to men's, and besides, it's not satisfied with sex. Most sex doesn't give women orgasms or pleasure, so starting from that premise, it wouldn't be true. Arousal in women is the desire to have an orgasm, and we generally give ourselves that better. In men, on the other hand, it's the desire to ejaculate inside a body or have sex. Our attraction to men is more platonic, intimate, and romantic. We get aroused, they get aroused just by seeing us, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 10:32 AM
2

Men are the ones who see it as a transaction; they want sex, they see sex as superficial. In contrast, most women aren't looking for sex, but rather a romantic, loving relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:42 AM
1

All that you're saying is something most women don't do. Most women need to be manipulated or lied to in some way to get them to have casual sex. The goal isn't sex for most women, and it has nothing to do with the type of man. Of course, there are women who make exceptions for men who give them money in return, and this is without manipulation or anything, like sugar babies, but this is simply another form of prostitution, and it's not about the man himself, but about what he's going to give he…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:36 AM
5

Women also do a lot in relationships, starting with sex. Many women in relationships are neither satisfied nor have orgasms, or they tend to fake it because if they don't fake it, they say they're frigid and that other girlfriends were different, when surely they faked it too. And then there's making women perform sexual acts they don't want, which become a chore, and having to pretend they like it because "she liked it in porn," when they don't realize that porn is nothing more than women actin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:32 AM
3

In most hookups, the man has to give something to get what he wants, whether through manipulation or lies. In prostitutes, the man has to give money. In all relationships, the man has to give something to get sex; the interest in sex isn't always the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:24 AM
-1

Evolutionarily speaking, sex isn't the goal. For men, it is, but for women, it's finding someone who will provide protection and resources for future offspring. This depends on the animal we're talking about, but it's something that doesn't happen in casual relationships. These only benefit the man; they only give him what he wants. And even if sex were the goal, then women should only be able to have sex once a month, and men should adapt to it like most animals. In these cases, females go into…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:20 AM
1

The definition of attraction is different for men and women. Furthermore, it must be said that most women end long-term relationships tired of the man, whereas those in short-term relationships don't seem to have time to get tired of him, or even get to know him well enough to begin to tire of him.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:13 AM
2

As a woman, I would say that the black pill is less reliable than the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:09 AM
3

Because most women's interest is not sexual, there are differences in testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:08 AM
1

Most women don't want that. And most sex, even in relationships, doesn't satisfy a horny woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:08 AM
5

Men and women simply have different perspectives on sex; for us, it's not a goal, but for men it is. That's why there's so much incompatibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:06 AM
4

What does it mean to you when a woman is attracted to you? Or how would you define it? Because women and men define and experience it differently. Most women are attracted to the men they date, but not sexually, rather intimately and romantically. We don't get aroused by a specific person or even just by seeing them. Sex isn't even a goal for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 09:03 AM
6

Why would we have sex prematurely if it's not what we want? Most women want committed relationships, which is why men encourage us by making us believe otherwise in order to get sex. Now, why would we give it up so quickly if only they get what they want? This basically goes against our own best interests just to benefit them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 08:57 AM
1

I'm not saying I don't understand the whole comment, I mean I don't understand what you're asking me
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 02:18 AM
1

And because most bedroom complaints are from men towards their wives, and women agree with their wives. And because most of these forums are for men complaining, not women. And because there are women who don't value sex per se, but romance, and without romance we wouldn't have sex; I think this is true for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 02:14 AM
1

So what other kind of empathy does the author of this sub or you want from women if not sexual? Because in some way, all men want that kind of empathy, not for you to listen to them or solve other kinds of problems with their feelings. It's always "women don't give me casual sex" or "women don't give me easy sex," and that kind of thing that most women aren't interested in because it benefits men, not us. On the other hand, when we ask men to empathize about our need for romantic relationships, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 02:08 AM
0

I can assure you that 50% of them have been manipulated or lied to with promises of romantic relationships. Another 40% are women who pretend to have those kinds of relationships for male validation or attention. And the other 10% are prostitutes trying to sell their services. And there are really few women interested in hookups. This app and real life also prove that what I'm saying is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 02:02 AM
1

I don't understand what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 01:57 AM
1

I'm not talking about when masturbation or contraception was invented; I'm talking about why, if men tell women to overcome their nature, they don't overcome theirs. When I say your theory about animals isn't 100% accurate, I'm not talking about contraception; I'm talking about everything the text explains, that there are many ways to mate, not just the one you're referring to. The point is that these cases exist, and they happen all the time in the animal world. We can't expect everything to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 01:56 AM
1

The girls I know only have sex for validation, so their handsome boyfriend can show them how much he wants them, or how much he loves them, or that kind of thing. If it weren't for these things, they wouldn't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 01:48 AM
1

You're in the minority. Can you do it with just any man? Does a handsome man on the street excite you? Do you get depressed if you don't have one? The answer for most women is no to these questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 01:46 AM
1

It's a privilege from your point of view, but if you were in our shoes, you'd know it isn't. Women simply don't see those things unless we want to exploit them (like prostitutes, actresses, and all that) or unless we're interested in them (nymphomaniacs). There are differences between testosterone and estrogen.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 09:51 AM
0

Even they have to make an effort, and it's not that we're sexually attracted to them, we're romantically attracted to them; most women aren't thinking about sex all the time like you guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 09:49 AM
–

Women biologically have to give birth and take care of their babies, that's already a lot of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 09:45 AM
3

Yes, they say, “There are contraceptive methods, overcome your biology, millions of years have passed,” it's as if women were saying, “Masturbation exists, overcome your biology, millions of years have passed.” In the animal world, what you say is not 100% true either, it depends on the species and the circumstances. For example, there are females that mate with two bisexual males to leave them with the offspring and leave, there are also females that raise their offspring alone, and there are a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 09:39 AM
6

Exactly, that's what pisses me off the most about these kinds of posts; they think women value the same things they do. When "hookups" are especially bad for us, and that's why most men have to manipulate or lie to get them. It's like women telling men, "You're lucky because you can have a romantic relationship with a woman without her sexually valuing or objectifying you"; this doesn't make sense to you, well, this post doesn't make sense to us either. This is a generalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 09:25 AM
3

Empathize with what? If all you want is sex, and most of these forums are about men saying women are bad because they don't give them sex, guess what... Women are motivated by things other than sex because sex is generally bad, unlike men who will always have good sex. Para los hombres sexo malo es, la chica no cumplió alguna de tus fantasías.. Para las mujeres sexo malo es dolor físico y emocional.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 09:15 AM
7

We offer empathy, the problem is that you want sexual empathy, and that's another level of wanting to use and manipulate someone knowing they don't want the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 09:11 AM
1

That's because you think and value things like a man. If you had a woman's mind, you'd know that a dry spell doesn't affect us at all. In fact, most sex for women is bad. The world of abundant dating doesn't work for us because these are generally men who only want sex, which doesn't benefit us in any way other than providing validation, and that can be obtained from other sources and activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 09:05 AM
–

Exactly, and the worst part is that there are men who want you to be like that when it's 99% acted, even the amateur kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:17 AM
–

And it's not because we want to have sex with them or want any kind of integration with them. I think almost all women are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:15 AM
–

Exactly, that's what I said, but romance novels don't have to have porn either.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 10:31 PM
–

Most women don't even use dildos; vibrators are used more, but dildos and things that are inserted are not used as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 10:09 PM
–

The equivalent of porn for women is generally romance novels. And for men, the equivalent of sex toys is flashlights and things like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 10:07 PM
–

No, you don't need to try it to know; it's not even pleasurable the first few times you do it with your long-term partner, so there's no point in trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 02:07 PM
–

Actually, no. Women in general aren't usually interested in anyone, and if we are interested in someone, it's more platonic, romantic, and passionate than sexual, so casual sex isn't an option; it doesn't satisfy you. Besides, there are prostitutes, you know? And there are countries where it's legal, and even in places where it's illegal, people do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:23 PM
–

Women want the freedom to sleep with any man they want without the responsibility and obligations that come with that freedom. Most women aren't even interested in casual sex, what are you talking about? It's you who are interested, and that's why this forum exists in the first place. Throughout history, men have gone to wars that men themselves created. And the right to vote wasn't for poor people, it was for rich people, and even among those rich people, only men could vote. Women were exclude…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:18 PM
–

No, we are saying that for these reasons we would not do it; the responsibility lies in the fact that we would not do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:07 PM
–

Most men have to convince, deceive, or manipulate us to have casual sex. It's not like women just jump at the chance to sleep with the super hot guy. You think that's the case because you're a man, and if a woman like that walked by, you'd be all over her. Furthermore, we're already stating the reasons why we don't have or don't want to have casual sex, meaning we're already assuming we don't do it or that we won't do it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:06 PM
–

Whether you get infected or not, you have an incentive to do it; most women don't. There won't be pleasure, there won't be an orgasm, there could be STDs, there could be pregnancy... and countless other problems. Besides, men can be driven by sexual desire and attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:02 PM
–

Forget the STDs, if it's not pleasurable, would you do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:59 AM
–

It's not even the social stigma; it's simply that it doesn't benefit anyone in any way. It's better to just masturbate. And that's what most women do anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:58 AM
–

That's what I think, these people don't seem to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:56 AM
–

Women who think they are all men don't even have casual sex, or some even reject all types of sex, even with a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:41 AM
–

Being empathetic doesn't mean you should do something that doesn't benefit you at all and on top of that you don't get what you really want, because the more casual sex men have, the less they want to commit because they are already getting what they want from you, whereas women don't get what they want from a man through casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:05 AM
–

There really isn't one, because even though women experience orgasm and pleasure, sex isn't such a strong desire that they'd want to have it with strangers because we don't feel sexual attraction as easily as you do. The only way giving orgasms like men can be an incentive for women to open their legs is in a long-term relationship, because both partners get what they want from each other, and women aren't as interested in sex as they are in romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:03 AM
–

Why should we make it easier for them if it doesn't benefit us in most cases?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:00 AM
–

Because you're the ones who want sex, not us. So it doesn't do women any good to have it handed to them easily when it's simply not what we're looking for. Besides, sex tends not to benefit women at all, especially in terms of pleasure and orgasms.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 10:59 AM
4

The most viewed category for women on corn is lesbian.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:20 AM
1

I believe I've provided sufficient evidence to prove my point. I don't deny that some women are visually aroused, but they are definitely few and far between. Even those who are visually aroused, like by porn, don't want to be with the people in the videos they watch, unlike men who do want to have sex and perform the acts depicted in those videos. There are also many heterosexual women who admit to watching women in porn or lesbian porn, but they aren't attracted to being with a woman and find …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:03 AM
1

In fact, I've already mentioned a lot of evidence in my previous post, evidence that we see every day in society and that you can also see on Reddit itself. Why do you think this forum exists in the first place? Because of the differences between men and women. And where is the evidence that refutes all of this? When you're literally on a forum where most of the people are men complaining about women and their lack of sexuality, and women complaining about being sexualized, isn't that obvious to…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:00 AM
1

It's not just me who believes this; most people believe it, and that's why all those things I mentioned exist. It's a reality that I'm careful to affect, but the things I mentioned happen, and they happen a lot. Do you have any way to refute that they don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 01:53 AM
1

Everything I've said is evident in all societies; I don't understand why it's so difficult to see. Even in animals, a lack of interest in sex is shown in females; most of them only do it to get pregnant and then don't do it again until they are older and their offspring are sufficiently mature. You yourself can verify this information; haven't you ever seen an animal documentary? Because I'm addicted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:25 PM
1

Anyone who reads this paragraph knows these things are true if they live with other people; it's a different story if you live in isolation, but yes. Besides, can you prove to me how what I said isn't true?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:22 PM
1

Okay, it's clear you don't live in this society. If you walk down a street every day that always has deer, and everyone sees that there are deer, do you need a study to know there are deer there? No, it's simply obvious. The same goes for what I just said about women; that's why throughout history sex has been sold, men have paid for it, because women simply don't have a direct desire for it. Are there no signs of dead bedrooms? Are there no signs of prostitution? Pornography—which, strangely en…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:20 PM
1

I'm not presenting proof, but you can also see a lot of women online complaining about it, and I'm sure you know that most of them are like that because you've probably had to make something up to get her to stop being annoying, or you've probably invented a romance just to get into her pants. In other words, proof isn't needed, because it's everywhere. I've said that most women don't want meaningless sex; that doesn't even benefit us, and it's not pleasurable or even leads to orgasm for most of…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 08:06 PM
1

This has nothing to do with putting on chairs, it has to do with a biological factor that nobody likes to talk about but everyone knows about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 06:22 PM
0

Soy mujer y no salgo con nadie, y mis amigas, a menos que tengan una relación larga, tampoco. Lo mismo les pasa a la mayoría de las mujeres de mi círculo. ¡Qué casualidad, ¿verdad? Esta regla del 80/20 ni siquiera tiene sentido. Debería hacerse un estudio general, no solo centrado en las aplicaciones de citas, donde la mayoría de los usuarios son hombres. Y un pequeño grupo de mujeres obviamente estará con un pequeño grupo de hombres. No somos como tú que te acuestas con todo el mundo. No aposta…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 05:03 PM
3

The most of woman are not dating too, i don't know what are you talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 02:05 PM
1

The old world, where even lower-class men had wives practically guaranteed, where men could easily resort to cheap prostitutes for sex without their wives, and where men with at least decent means could easily find a younger mistress. This wouldn't even happen in the old world; back then, prostitutes didn't offer such sexual variety, and the only men with younger lovers had to have money. In fact, back then, the only way to get a woman was by giving her what she wanted: money. There wasn't even …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 02:01 PM
1

Sure, but you said that even men without resources had that type of relationship with women in the past, or poor men, that is, the average man of the time (also, what time period), and this was not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:59 PM
2

Buen punto: imagina hacerlo y no sentir nada, o no llegar al orgasmo. Eso desmotiva a la mayoría de las mujeres. Pero en la mayoría de los casos, no es porque el hombre sea malo o no; tiene más que ver con que nos distraemos con facilidad y no hay tanta sensación física debido a aspectos biológicos del cuerpo. Así que la mayoría de las mujeres no tienen la motivación para hacerlo. Muchos hombres creen que lo hacen porque creen que el porno es real y que todo lo que la mujer hace o le hacen es re…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:55 PM
1

Because we're not that interested in sex, because when it's over it's simply disappointing. Imagine doing it and feeling nothing, or not reaching orgasm. That's something that demotivates most women. But in most cases, it's not because the man is bad or not; it has more to do with the fact that we get distracted easily, and there isn't as much physical sensation due to biological aspects of the body. So most women don't have the motivation to do it. Many men think they do because they think porn…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:54 PM
1

Most women aren't just interested in sex, so they make it difficult enough for men to want to commit, but even then many don't succeed, so they stop seeing them or simply don't sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:49 PM
1

In my experience it's the complete opposite; most women want relationships, but the problem is that these men don't commit. That's why many of them, after being used in that way, either hate men in general or simply lose interest in any kind of relationship, both physical and emotional, with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:45 PM
–

Exacto
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 12:29 PM
–

Yo también he hablado con madres solteras y está sos más felices que las casadas , la única razón que me describen que no les gusta es la situación económica, en cambio la casada tiene dinero también de su marido, esa es la diferencia diría yo por la que están mas amargadas las que tú conoces
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 12:15 PM
–

No creo nada de eso. 1. Las mujeres relmente lo sexual no es lo que nos llama, de echo muchas prefieres quedarse solteras y célibes, porque se sintieron usadas sexualmente y no quieren seguir sintiéndose así, hay que entender la diferencia entre hombres y mujeres. 2. De echo no, a la mayoría de la smujeres sno nos gusta el sexo casual y incluso si eres poco atractiva habrá hombres que quieran contigo. 3. Estoy de acuerdo con eso, querían romance y esos hombres querían sexo, pero a nosotras no se…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 12:07 PM
1

It's not that we sexualize a few men, it's that we don't sexualize any of them. In other words, women don't get aroused purely by looking at men, no matter if they're only 10%. These women are interested in the specific man without any sexualization. I always try to explain this; this is the reason why most women get angry when they're sexualized—it's because we don't sexualize.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:47 AM
1

You base those claims on nothing. Men of low means in the past had too much work to have wives, and while women did marry young, you needed a lot of money to have a mistress. Only powerful men had that, and poor men sometimes couldn't even get a wife. That's why many male genes haven't been passed on to the next generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:41 AM
1

Most women simply see sex as something essential or obligatory, so you need to communicate that need to your wife or girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:34 AM
1

And what about the brothels? Escorts? Prostitutes? Sugar babys?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:32 AM
1

You see, even before, women didn't practice BJ or 4nal sex; that was something gay men did. But now ordinary women are expected to do it. Besides, most women don't like it, and just because coen actresses act the way they do, or certain YouTubers try to sell their services by acting that way, doesn't mean it's something we want to do. Before, sex was more about reproduction; you do what's necessary for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:30 AM
1

The difference is that the attraction most women feel towards unknown men is not sexual; that is, we don't get excited just by seeing them, nor do we want sex with them for no reason. It's more romantic, and that's why it annoys us when their attraction towards us is sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:23 AM
1

What makes you think women in real life do that? Most of the women I know either stay celibate and don't care about sex, or they're only interested in whether they want a man as a potential boyfriend. I think people misunderstand the internet because the most vulgar things appear in their search results, and they keep looking for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:19 AM
1

The thing is, society accepting female sexuality and not discriminating against it wouldn't really change anything, because sexual desire is also biological, and many women simply don't feel it or feel it very little, due to testosterone and estrogen. I've answered this before: But that's the difference; women have to be in the mood from the start. We don't get aroused just by looking at men. Our arousal is related to our menstrual cycle, and even at our peak, we don't get aroused just by lookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:09 AM
1

But that's the difference: women have to be in the mood from the start. We don't get aroused just by looking at men. Our arousal is related to our menstrual cycle, and even at our peak, we don't get aroused just by looking at men—I'm talking about most women. Our arousal also comes from direct physical contact, meaning when a man tries to arouse you by touching you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:02 AM
2

I don't think so. Honestly, men back then didn't understand women's bodies either, and they probably just did the typical in-and-out thing and that was it. And with that, it's no wonder women didn't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 10:54 AM
1

Esto me sorprendió mucho cuando lo descubrí. Me sorprendió que los hombres pudieran excitarse con solo ver a una mujer. Como mujer, eso no me pasa, y sé que tampoco les pasa a otras mujeres. Al principio me costaba creerlo, and i didnt want to Accept It, y por eso no entendía la infidelidad masculina, porque la infidelidad femenina nunca es puramente sexual, y cuando lo es, nunca es puramente sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 10:43 AM
1

¿No podría hacer un estudio más nuevo? Además este estudio en que se basa o en que tipo de mujer se basa? Bueno, el caso es que los hombres lo veis de una perspectiva masculina, estás mujeres no tienen fantasía de violación como tal de que venga un hombre random de la calle que no conoces nada y no te atrae y haga eso, creo que la fantasía viene de que un hombre que ya te atrae y ya conoces he incluso ya tienes relaciones con el te mostrará su deseo mediante un acto más agresivo de sexo, pero no…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 10:10 AM
1

A la mayoría de mujeres no les gusta eso, el hombre rico puede ser si pero la gran "D" es más una fanatsia del p0rno de los hombres, la mayoría de mujeres ven p0rno lesbiana, luego la vi0lacion no se de dónde se saca que gusta. Siendo que nos gusta más el hombre que nos da atención y nos distrae, y también es protector y cuida y le importamos, y estas cosasson cosas que solo se pueden tener en relaciones largas y es lo que a la smujeres nos gusta, pero eso muchas mujeres hoy deciden no tener s3x…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:51 AM
1

The most of woman Who wach Corn, wach lesbian Corn, so there IS no man there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:47 AM
1

The most-watched Corn by women (there IS a little bit of woman Who wach it) is lesbian. Besides, romance novels are more about a rich, handsome man's obsession with an ordinary girl; it's not so much about sex. It's more about knowing you can't give that man anything but sex. There are even books where the woman doesn't have sex with the man until after they've known each other for a long time. But yes, what women look for most in those kinds of men in books is the idea of a man who is obsessed …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:46 AM
3

Porque ustedes los hombres creéis que la smujeres se tiran encima de estos hombres? Nunca he visto esto en mi vida y nunca he visto a mujeres desearlos sexualmente, he visto a mujeres desear la atención de ellos y comportarse así por querer su atención, pero en mujeres eso no es lo mismo que quererlos sexualmente, l mayoría de estos Chads son igualmente rechazados.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 03:37 AM
2

No, yo creo que hay también una diferencia de deseo, el hombre desea a la mujer sexualmente más que la mujer al hombre, los hombres se excitan con solo ver a la mujer, esto es algo que a las mujeres nos sorprende porque nosotras nisiquirra en edad adolescente o joven, no nos excitamos con cuerpo.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 03:33 AM
0

Personalmente considero que 50 sombras de Grey gusta a la mayoría de mujeres que lo leen porque va de una chica promedio, que consigue a un hombre guapo y millonario que le va a dar la vida de millonaria que quiere, mientras también la distrae y le da emociones fuertes. Y ella le tiene que dar un s3xo intenso porque la mujer sabe que en la vida real no puede retener un hombre con dinero y que le dé esa vida a cambio de nada, así que yo creo que la parte s3xual es por eso, porque tiene que dar al…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 03:21 AM
0

Los millonarios tienen acceso a millones de euros, me voy a enojar porque yo no tengo ese acceso?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:20 PM
2

Si l mujer es introvertida, no tendrán sexo casual ni con el ni con nadie. Además, el sexo casual para las mujeres no es del todo casual, el hombre tiene siempre que aportar algo, que sea un Chad no quita que no tenga que aportar nada, la única diferencia entre un Chad y un chico normal es que el Chad llama la atención a la primera.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter