TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UnityNow Archive

View 5 posts and 125 comments by UnityNow on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

And many people work for the wealthy elite without wearing them. Many wealthy elite wear them. Yep, and many men are not raped, so we should just ignore the ones who are. What a ridiculous argument. Just because what I'm saying isn't the case 100% of the time doesn't make it untrue. I clearly pointed out that it's not always the case. I went out of my way to use words like "sometimes" and "many." Of course it's not ubiquitous. You don't see every woman in the world beating her husband either, bu…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 10:27 PM
3

Good insight. Once the "a man should never hit a woman!" training kicks in, the brain shuts down in those who haven't woken up yet. They'd never be able to see the other half of it in equal terms even if she hit him with a frying pan.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:45 PM
4

Wow that's a beautiful video! Thanks for the link! Amazingly, most of the comments on the video are very supportive, too. People are waking up!
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:43 PM
4

Given we have countless examples now of feminists and SJWs being caught red-handed making up threats and sending them to themselves or each other, can we believe anything about this? What seems most likely to me by far is that they're mixing in real things men say that really aren't abusive with the fake threatening things the feminists and SJWs are sending to themselves and each other.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 04:48 AM
5

I see women saying the most horrible things about men all the time on the internet. It's an almost constant barrage. They even threaten men's lives fairly regularly. "Kill all men" is a phrase that's fairly popular in feminist circles now. Men almost never say anything even 1% of that magnitude, but if a man challenges some feminist lie or doesn't pander to women, especially if he's rude about it, he gets put on a list. Women actually threaten real violence against men = no consequences. Men rud…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 04:42 AM
115

It's a fucking witch hunt. I've said it before: the modern rape hysteria is analogous to the Salem Witch Trials (also the Inquisition). Some common themes are the assumed guilt of the accused, the need yet impossibility of the accused to prove their innocence, harsh punishments, and the assumed and protected purity of the accuser. There are so many similarities... The Salem Witch Trials In an age with much smaller populations than we have today, hundreds of people were accused, 150 people were i…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:11 PM
3

Where a lot of people get confused is they think being nice means giving more to the other person than they're getting. In any healthy relationship -- sexual, friendship, business, or any other -- people respect those who seem to understand the value each party is putting in, and are striving for mutual benefit. The stereotypical "nice guy" often goes too far and makes himself unattractive by showing that he doesn't respect himself. Some women do this too. Few people are attracted to someone who…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:52 AM
2

About four to five times as many men commit suicide as women. This is the only statistic that matters. Women say that they think about it more, and they "attempt" it more often, but they choose non-lethal methods in their "attempts." These are usually seen as cries for help. Many men actually feel so sad/depressed/hopeless that they truly try to kill themselves, and succeed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_differences_in_suicide
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:31 PM
3

Studies like these would be much more meaningful if the respondent was asked to choose an answer on a scale such as 1) I've never thought about committing suicide. 2) I've thought about committing suicide in passing. 3) I've thought passingly about committing suicide many times in my life. 4) I've thought in depth about committing suicide at least once in my life. 5) I actually planned out my suicide in detail and was seriously considering it. 6) I attempted suicide in a way that seriously harme…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:22 PM
0

Seriously. It would require almost no effort, especially with our current technology, for nearly all work and absolutely all tests to be completely anonymous. That would fix this issue really fast. There's a reason feminists don't want anonymous testing.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:15 AM
1

I can see this being part of it for sure, but I can think of several direct examples from my own life when the female teachers graded the boys lower in all cases even when the boys were better behaved. In the Honors program, we all had the same classes together for all of high school. It was a large school, but the Honors class was just that -- one group of students who filled a classroom, going to nearly all of our classes together. We all knew each others' behavior patterns and abilities very …
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:03 AM
15

She's wondering why she got downvoted, when it's very obvious why she got downvoted: She was being extremely sexist and offensive by assuming that men act like the horrible women in the article.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 07:22 PM
3

I once saw a study that looked at commercials over a 10 year period and found only TWO commercials wherein the man was the brilliant one and the woman was the stupid one. In all of the other thousands and thousands of commercials which had women and men competing against each other in any way, the man was the failure. We are being programmed to think of women as the ones who should be in charge in all situations, and to think of men as always making mistakes or doing something wrong. This ad is …
/r/MensRights22/07/15 03:33 PM
2

People upvoted your original comment because it's funny, and because there's some truth to it. You'd be far less likely to be accused of rape, and maybe slightly less likely to be convicted. But the reason some of your followup comments were downvoted is because you're ignoring the entire point of this article, the entire point of this whole conversation: Men can be labeled as criminals and punished regardless of evidence to the contrary, regardless of who they are or any detail of their lives o…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 02:42 PM
9

It's a fact that the number one abuser of children is the mother, by far. Seeing how many women rape young boys every day and get away with it, I'd say it's extremely likely that women are raping young boys far more often than men are raping young girls. Girls are encouraged to come forward about anything even slightly suspicious, while boys are encouraged to just take it and keep quiet about even horrible things they endure. Approximately 40 percent of child victims were maltreated by their mot…
/r/PussyPass11/06/15 01:22 AM
3

Yes, monied people control most of the final details, but women definitely have some influence even on the where by the types of people they deem worthy of sympathy or hate.
/r/PussyPass09/06/15 10:00 PM
3

Oh is that the new PC term? I thought it was person of forked tongue. No wait, that's the term for politicians.
/r/PussyPass09/06/15 09:56 PM
14

Who says they don't control war? Why do you think 99.9% of people who die in war are men? Of course they don't control it in an obvious, direct way. They control it in the same way they control everything else -- through manipulation.
/r/PussyPass09/06/15 06:57 PM
18

Yep, very similar things have happened to me. In one of my previous jobs, all of the women were much older than me, and half of them hit on me regularly. They'd often grab or stroke my bicep or chest while we were talking, and one even tried to kiss me on the mouth as she went in for a quick hug at the end of the day as we were all leaving together. Not one of the women saw anything wrong with any of this, even though they all knew I was married and clearly wasn't interested. Now reverse the rol…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:59 PM
9

I was hoping at least that there would be some decent comments on the youtube page. Was not disappointed: And Oprah loves it. I'll bet she does. This is as satanic as it gets. No wonder the US is on it's way down. Beyond disgusting. Anyone using this is putting pure torture on their faces and into their bodies and are culpable.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 02:09 PM
4

It's important to realize also that many of the statistics we see are based on arrests and/or convictions and/or prison populations. Men are arrested and convicted far more often for the same crimes than women are. Also, men are given far longer sentences for the same crimes as women are. So any stats based on arrests/convictions/prison populations will always be extremely skewed by an already discriminatory system. Also, most of the stats we see include false rape claims as if they're legitimat…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:25 PM
6

It's a real life example that serves as an accurate metaphor of what feminism is all about.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:31 AM
6

That's a good point. I heard it said recently that the main reason boys are falling behind in the modern education system (whereas they used to surpass girls in nearly every area) is because nearly all of the teachers are female, and more importantly, females have moved into higher positions that allow them to set standards. Psychologically, females tend to be more subjective than men, seeing the world through a very personal frame of reference. Men tend to look at the world in a more objective,…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:33 PM
1

Well my point was really just that no one should ever rush into marriage, and that not doing so can not only protect you from disaster but also has the chance of leading to a happy marriage, as it did with me. So even if your goal is to have a happy marriage, I feel like you're more likely to get it by not rushing into marriage, by really getting to know your partner over the course of years before you even consider it. Either way, marriage is something that should never be rushed into. The only…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:47 AM
2

Or be 100% sure that you know her very well and that you'll always be together. My wife and I were together, happily, for 14 years before we got married. Marriage should be an affirmation of what you already are, not an attempt to create something that isn't already present. The latter is a huge gamble.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:17 PM
14

The girls were given 6% higher marks than boys for similar work... In... anonymized tests, the boys outperformed girls in mathematics. The researchers compared these results with those from teachers' assessments of pupils on end-of-term report cards. In the teacher assessments, the girls did better than boys in maths. French schools perform another set of anonymized tests three years later, when pupils are 14. Analysis of these results found the girls had caught up and even overtaken the boys by…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:48 PM
9

In high school, in the Honors Program, our senior english teacher was an extreme feminist. She actually talked about feminist issues in class. All of the male students suddenly found that they couldn't get a passing grade on many of their papers no matter how hard they worked. All of the female students who had done poorly in previous Honors english courses suddenly found that they were getting easy A's. Since this teacher gave us work that was all about subjective analyses of literature, she co…
/r/PussyPass15/04/15 07:24 PM
3

Yes, we already knew this, but most people don't, so these types of articles are very useful.
/r/PussyPass15/04/15 07:09 PM
3

Boys don't matter. I saw yet another striking reminder of this in my very own extended family over Easter weekend. One of the young girls is known for constantly throwing fits and even hitting the other kids out of anger, yet she's constantly pampered by the adult women. That girl's younger brothers don't do any of that, yet when they do nothing more than make a mess (which any sane person could see is far less of a problem than someone who is hitting people out of anger), such as leaving their …
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:28 PM
6

Agreed. Case in point: The Salem Witch trials. A bunch of girls and women, mostly teenage girls, accused hundreds of people of being witches. Many people rotted in jail or were executed because of their accusations. Nearly every single accuser was a female, but the accused were both males and females. The accusers would convulse and roll around on the ground in court and say they were being attacked by the witches. To this day, the strongest theory is that the girls did it for nothing more than …
/r/PussyPass08/04/15 04:09 PM
4

This is a great video. It's rare to see a feminist referencing studies done by men as support for a logical argument. We've been living under gynocentrism for a very long time. It's so all-pervasive in our culture that most people aren't consciously aware of it. Two very interesting comments from the youtube page: Girl Writes What mentioned a study she had read where they looked at every commercial in which a man and woman were competing. Stuff like the laundry detergent, where one of them is us…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 02:47 PM
4

This is a great video. It's rare to see a feminist referencing studies done by men as support for a logical argument. We've been living under gynocentrism for a very long time. It's so all-pervasive in our culture that most people aren't consciously aware of it. Two very interesting comments from the youtube page: Girl Writes What mentioned a study she had read where they looked at every commercial in which a man and woman were competing. Stuff like the laundry detergent, where one of them is us…
/r/PussyPass01/04/15 02:45 PM
2

It's disgustingly offensive to us because we're aware of it. Those who are caught up in the hate can't see through the veil of confusion it creates. They feel good about themselves for attacking their "evil enemy," unable to see that they are the aggressors.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 07:48 PM
1

Yep, that definitely covers their basic strategy on many things. Thanks for sharing this. Breast cancer awareness is a great example. Who wasn't already aware of breast cancer? And why is it so much more important than other cancers? And while you were just making a point with this one example of how feminists turn a common problem into a women's issue, there's another dark side to the whole breast cancer awareness campaign, which is that raising awareness may have actually done more harm than g…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:29 AM
2

This is a beautiful analogy. It really deserves to be in a more recent post where more people will see it.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:04 PM
12

Many male feminists truly believe what they spout because they were brainwashed since birth to believe it. Feminism is a self-reinforcing belief system that allows few if any opportunities for a mind trapped within it to escape. Realize that many people now, both male and female, are raised only by their mother, with little to no contact with their father, thanks to feminists. They are taught in school by many women and very few men, thanks to feminists. Many of those female teachers are feminis…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:55 PM
25

Any non-mainstream view is often met with aggressive argument, extreme skepticism, or outright dismissal. It's often assumed that the non-mainstream idea cannot even possibly be right, and that supernatural levels of evidence must be provided in order to counter the mainstream (popular) view. The herd mentality is strong in humanity.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:29 PM
1

You're not in the minority. Most of us would love to curb online abuse. If you read what I wrote above, I hint at that. But we need to always be vigilant in assuring that we're also protecting free speech. One great solution to the problem is a set of personal filters. Many forms of online communication have them. If you don't ever want to see the word "cunt," just block that word. Many websites have built in profanity filters that you can enable or disable at will. Feminists have created/magnif…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:16 PM
15

Why do women get special protection from online harassment? How is this sexual harassment other than a few gendered words being part of it? These were tweets in response to her posting sports opinions. Many men who post sports opinions get harassed, abused, and trolled with much stronger language, and it also often includes gendered words. A man being called a dick is the equivalent of a woman being called a cunt. No one likes either word. When applied as personal labels, they're both widely rec…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 07:58 PM
9

claim fact Feminists are triggered by facts.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:46 PM
1

Sorry, I should have been more clear. "You misread it" was a joke. I was implying that your assumption about her caring about right and wrong is a bad assumption, not because of a fault on your part, but because you can't assume good intentions about feminists. Many of them truly hate men and will always justify even the worst actions of women. I thought the fact that I was joking would be obvious to you from the rest of what I said.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 01:43 AM
1

Or how about the woman who tortured the three year old daughter of her fiance to death when he broke up with her when she was caught cheating, and then she got caught pretending that a man broke into the house and did it?
/r/MensRights12/03/15 09:12 PM
1

Yes, it's obviously victim blaming. Most feminists don't see it that way though, because in their view, men are always at fault, and women are always the victim.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 08:17 PM
0

You misread it. She would never say, "Nobody should ever hit anybody," because she wants to reserve the right to hit men at any time for any reason. This person does not care about what's good or right. She wants women to be able to do anything they feel like doing without consequences, and men to be blamed for everything.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 08:15 PM
1

I'm pretty sure it's a feminist trying to troll/bait the sub, as happens often in here. They make some outrageous statement, and if enough people upvote it, they quote it and say, "This is what MRA's believe!" That account is 16 days old, so it's probably either a troll/baiter (most likely) or someone brand new to the MRM, who's still working out some anger over just realizing all of this stuff.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 08:00 PM
1

Why are some people acting like this is a strawman? I've seen dozens of similar posts, some of them from people I know personally. Many women truly feel that it's their right to beat their man whenever they feel like it. And many women feel that women are always right no matter what, and that they should encourage other women to take advantage of men at all times. "Preach it baby girl!" I've even heard old women say, "You go girl" to other women who were talking about taking advantage of men. Th…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 07:55 PM
7

Not only are there some comments in that thread saying maybe it was just experimentation, but a few of the sickos followed us in here. It's simple: When one of the people is crying and saying get off me, it's rape, regardless of age. If the girl was two, maybe you could get away with saying she didn't know what "no" means, but come on. She was 13. She knew she was hurting him, and she did it anyway. Yes, she was a kid, too, and so were lots of boys who have been severely punished for even consen…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:58 AM
3

Yes, the Twilight paradox is a great example of this kind of double standard. There are plenty of examples of that, where mainstream media shows middle aged women going crazy over young men, but then simultaneously portrays that it's creepy if the genders are reversed. But this specific case is more of a pussy pass because there's video of a 24 year old woman passionately kissing a 14 year old boy, and it's considered okay even though if the genders were reversed, there would most likely be char…
/r/PussyPass02/03/15 03:22 PM
86

Wow, the people here saying this isn't a pussy pass are either sick SJWs or brainwashed. I'm all for letting people make their own choices in life, but the idea here is clear: If this was a 24 year old man grabbing a 14 year old girl and shoving his tongue down her throat, he'd probably end up with charges. Do most people in general want most laws in general erased? Yep. Most people would be happy with only the obvious crimes like murder, theft, and assault being on the books, and then let every…
/r/PussyPass01/03/15 04:08 AM
1

This is especially true for online media, but three minutes of Fox News will remind you that it's true for all media. At least in online media, there's enough freedom left that there are still some good journalists out there as well. Obviously you won't find them at a rag like Jezebel though.
/r/PussyPass21/02/15 08:41 PM
5

True, it's obvious to those of us who've been in the MRM for a while, but realize that we constantly get people who are new to the MRM, and people just checking it out, so they may not know this. A lot of people came here from feminism, and some even still identify as feminists, so it's worthwhile to point out that the practical actions of feminists usually do not match what they say their ideals are. Instead of supporting men's rights as they say they do, their actions are far more often agains…
/r/PussyPass21/02/15 08:38 PM
4

I grew up in a neighborhood where all of the kids played outside all day and late into the night. We had tons of freedom. I have vivid memories of my childhood. When I had absolutely no idea what sexuality was, there were girls my age trying to get me to do sexual things with them. And a couple of them were very persistent even when I was very resistant. I know that happened to some of the other boys, too. So from personal experience, at least in the neighborhood I grew up in, yes, the girls wer…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:38 PM
52

In other words, feminists have successfully gotten "Don't ever hit a girl, even in self defense" written into law. Even sadder, the male victim will be arrested and charged more often than the female aggressor even if the male never touches her, because of prejudices and training to always see the male as the dominant aggressor. /u/ARedthorn posted the relevant info here.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:03 PM
1

Wow. Instead of recognizing the obvious meaning of this data, that there are men doing good things in the world, that a majority of the leaders in environmentalism and just generally trying to make the world a better place are men, they start from the feminist presumption that all men are evil, and argue that the evil men need to be made to stop doing good in the world so women can take their place. Pure insanity.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:25 PM
13

Guilty until proves innocent assumes that they could be innocent, which would require doubting victims accusers. So, yeah... I know it's what you meant, but we're getting bombarded by feminist rewrites of language, meanings, and assumptions, so even though your message was sarcasm, I think this little change in thought is worth pointing out, so people don't get it in their heads that these women are actually always or even usually true victims.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:10 PM
49

I've said it before: the modern rape hysteria is analogous to the Salem Witch Trials (also the Inquisition). Some common themes are the assumed guilt of the accused, the need yet impossibility of the accused to prove their innocence, harsh punishments, and the assumed and protected purity of the accuser. There are so many similarities... The Salem Witch Trials In an age with much smaller populations than we have today, hundreds of people were accused, 150 people were imprisoned, 20 people were e…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:34 PM
2

Neighbor Tammy Ramsey expressed concern to KOMO about the potential for missed opportunities to help the family. "Why weren't we knocking on the door?" she said. "I think that we need to rally and love to understand and not to judge." Imagine if we applied this to everyone. Imagine if love and understanding for disturbed men were acceptable enough that they'd print it in the news. Imagine the feminist outrage if a man had done this to three small children and people were calling for love and und…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:22 AM
4

At least they asked you. They just did it with me. It was a very friendly environment overall, but in addition to the verbal flirting from the middle aged women, they also had a tendency to put their hands on my chest or biceps while talking with me. One even tried to kiss me on the lips during a hug as we were all leaving for the evening. And they all knew I'm a happily married man, and had met my wife.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 07:18 PM
4

I agree wholeheartedly with what you're saying here, but this is also part of why this demonstrates the misandry in our culture. Females are taken at their word all the time in rape cases. In nearly all rape cases, it's impossible to prove it wasn't consensual. The word of the alleged victim is itself admitted as the primary evidence. Yet when the victim is a man, we see the man being disbelieved by friends, loved ones, and the system itself. "Well, it's impossible to prove it wasn't consensual,…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:11 PM
12

The 90% of men who are completely invisible to many (some would say most) women. Those men don't exist to these women, but they are the wellspring of all of that magical creation that happens all around them. Some of my social circles are very progressive (in the real sense), but some of them merely think they are, when in reality they're just very feminist and anti-male. The latter tend to have a huge disconnect between wanting women to be the only ones with any power, and the only ones seen as…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 09:31 PM
5

In the current climate, many will seem to be against the issues because the issues are so intimately tied with gender-bias against men. MRA's want that gender biased removed, but while it's there, a men's rights advocate can't realistically support measures that hurt men. Most of the posts in here point out and discuss the areas in which men are being hurt by gender bias, but I see a few posts every now and then that are purely applauding examples of gender neutrality. I've seen a few such posts…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:46 PM
2

No, they mean respect for people, not men (who are less than the lowliest animal, because animals deserve respect and protection).
/r/MensRights22/01/15 07:02 PM
3

I know this was a rhetorical question, but probably nearly every MRA in existence agrees with you. There are many issues that we'd all fully support if gender was completely removed from the equation.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:58 PM
3

I agree completely with your statement, and it's good to see people speaking up about it, but it's extremely difficult to prove because feminism has so strongly influenced every part of the process that the statistics are heavily biased in their favor. For example, it's well known that men are given much longer sentences for the exact same crime. This is a provable statistic that's not easily hidden or distorted by feminists, so they just don't talk about it. Instead, they talk about how men are…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:56 PM
2

Oh look at you walking around with your eyes open and your gaze unaverted, talking about the real motivations behind things. Don't you know that you're just a lowly man, a sex-crazed maniac incapable of knowing right from wrong? You need the wise guidance of a loving woman. Seriously though, you've hit the nail on the head.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:12 PM
16

If you pay careful attention, you'll notice that they only care about gender neutrality when it benefits them. Otherwise, they themselves would have complained about the obviously sexist posters you're describing.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:14 PM
3

Thanks for this post. It really helps me to read the stories of other men who are consciously aware of this double standard and how it hurts them. I wrote a post very similar to yours, with some similar examples, here. I also wrote a post listing a few examples of the many ways in which men are treated worse than women here.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:55 PM
3

I think you hit the nail on the head here. I imagine most of the questions were extremely misleading and/or they made the answers mean something very different from how most people would interpret them. I'd say there's a very high probability that a question like your example was on there, and that for every one of the participants who said they'd have sex with a drunk girl, they counted that as them saying they'd rape her. If not this exact scenario, something very much like it.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:17 AM
3

He's definitely better off. Seeing that she could let her "friends" convince her to break off an engagement with someone she supposedly loved, she would have most likely been the type of wife who would let her friends convince her that her husband was abusive with his neglect every time he did anything for himself, no matter how well he took care of her and how terribly she treated him. Then they'd convince her to divorce him, take his home, half his money, or a lot more than half if they had ch…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:50 PM
9

So during a verbal argument, two women started physically attacking this guy, then the woman who easily outweighed him pushed him to the ground and stood over him, apparently ready to attack him again within a crowd so tight he might not have been able to escape, and when he defends himself, he's the monster? It's hard to tell the background from the photo, but the story makes it sound like there were people all around flooding the area, and the photo looks like they might have him backed agains…
/r/PussyPass03/01/15 07:57 PM
3

He did an AMA over here. Not only did he lose a year of his life, but while he was in there, someone left his charge sheet on display for inmates to find. This 15 year old was beaten regularly for "being" a rapist, even though he wasn't. Also, it ruined his relationships, his schooling, and more. It destroyed his family's finances (at least they had a way to pay for a decent trial). He was imprisoned for a year and denied bail on nothing except the word of a girl whose story made no sense and ch…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:51 AM
3

He did an AMA over here. Not only did he lose a year of his life, but while he was in there, someone left his charge sheet on display for inmates to find. This 15 year old was beaten regularly for "being" a rapist, even though he wasn't. Also, it ruined his relationships, his schooling, and more. It destroyed his family's finances (at least they had a way to pay for a decent trial). He was imprisoned for a year and denied bail on nothing except the word of a girl whose story made no sense and ch…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:50 AM
3

I understand why you want to believe that's too far, and normally I'd agree. I believe the justice system goes too far constantly. He never should have been in that situation. There were so many points at which the justice system should have put the brakes on this. However, women will never learn, will never stop destroying men's lives in ways like this, unless we start holding them to the same standards as men are held. Should it be like this at all? Absolutely not. But while it is, women need …
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:20 PM
5

She should be held without bail for a year, like he was, then tried. If found guilty, she should receive the same sentence he would have received if he had been found guilty.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:33 PM
7

He's doing an AMA over here. Not only did he lose a year of his life, but while he was in there, someone left his charge sheet on display for inmates to find. This 15 year old was beaten regularly for "being" a rapist, even though he wasn't. Also, it ruined his relationships, his schooling, and more. It destroyed his family's finances (at least they had a way to pay for a decent trial). He was imprisoned for a year and denied bail on nothing except the word of a girl whose story made no sense an…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:31 PM
89

they've never had regulations put on their body or had to fight for their right to anything Just to name a few: Automatic genital mutilation for most males in the united states immediately after birth. Only males must sign up for selective service, basically opting in for slavery. Men who do not opt in for this potential slavery are not allowed to vote, to receive financial aid, nor to receive many other types of government assistance and protections. Females are given all of these rights automa…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 07:25 AM
2

1) Men have balls. It's as simple as that. We have to spread our legs, or we are crushing our balls. To try to tell us that we must crush our balls in order to make women slightly more comfortable is both extremely selfish and insane. 2) Many women take up far more space than the average man with their hip size and/or their bags/purse sitting next to them.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:23 AM
3

Thank you. I was about to post the same thing before I saw this. And as someone mentioned above, organizations like this are producing statistics that people use. When heavily biased organizations are settings the policies that label who the perpetrator is and then similarly biased organizations are sorting through the data to find the numbers that match the story they want to tell, we get extremely skewed statistics. And even in those scenarios, we're seeing numbers that put men and women nearl…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 05:10 AM
12

I'm a guy. I was barely hurt by a couple of boys trying to show dominance when I was a kid in the early years of school. Other than that, no male has ever hurt me, nor even tried to. But off the top of my head, I count over a dozen females who've actively tried to hurt me. Some were girls who were trying to flirt with me when we were kids, and took it way too far until they were doing crazy things like kicking me to get my attention. Some of them were adults when I was a kid, because they didn't…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 05:47 PM
4

Sadly, insane and ridiculous are two words that accurately describe a lot of them. There's a total disconnect from reality there. As to the job loss, here it is in her own words. Knowyourmeme has a great entry on plebcomics that also includes some background into all of this.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:39 PM
14

Thanks for this great post. I strongly disagree with the idea that content like this might not belong here. While it could also go to TIA, it definitely belongs here as well. Remember that a lot of people who view /r/MensRights are new to the concept. One thing everyone needs to be shown and reminded of is that feminists and SJW's control the conversation on the internet, on college campuses, and elsewhere not because they have the most valid points but more because they employ extreme measures …
/r/MensRights10/12/14 02:44 PM
1

If only the average person were intelligent/wise enough for this to be true.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:06 PM
7

Exactly. They wanted a reliable way to destroy men's lives. School, at all levels, is one of the primary areas in which feminists are attacking boys and men. Most K-12 teachers are female, and the percentage of female teachers is growing. Young males in my family are being ignored or outright abused by the female teachers, who consistently give them low grades, while the young females are being given special tutoring and straight A's when they can't even do the simplest math and have atrocious s…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:03 PM
2

When I looked at all of the factors, I also came up with over 50% of rape accusations being false. As /u/xgneu comments here, it can be argued that every single man is a victim of false rape accusation, which would mean that over 99% of rape accusations are false. "There are statements like 'all men are rapist' or 'this is safe space from men rapist'. We could easily argue that ALL men are victims or false rape accusation." But of course we're talking about a more specific, direct accusation of …
/r/MensRights07/12/14 07:45 PM
2

There's a reason this type of thing is called a witch hunt. The Salem Witch Trials of 1692 stands out as a great example of what happens when we put too much faith in the accusers, and aggressively attack the accused. In an age with much smaller populations than we have today, hundreds of people were accused, about 150 people were imprisoned, 20 people were executed, and five of the imprisoned people died in prison. All of this was due almost entirely to the false testimony of girls and women of…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:22 AM
2

There's a reason this type of thing is called a witch hunt. The Salem Witch Trials of 1692 stands out as a great example of what happens when we put too much faith in the accusers, and aggressively attack the accused. In an age with much smaller populations than we have today, hundreds of people were accused, about 150 people were imprisoned, 20 people were executed, and five of the imprisoned people died in prison. All of this was due almost entirely to the false testimony of girls and women of…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:19 AM
1

This is an excellent point. In this sense, 100% of men are victims of false rape accusation. And it's not just some vague thing, either. Every single man has experienced the prejudice that occurs in certain situations, where women eye them suspiciously and treat them differently, whether they're aware of it or not. I was at a retreat a few months ago, and right at the end, one of the women started talking about how all men should be taught not to rape. We were all exhausted by this point and rea…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:27 AM
4

What are you talking about? A PERSON decided she was upset/uncomfortable in some way. The "thousands of students" you're talking about aren't even people. They're just men. Obviously one real person is worth more than thousands of non-people. /s
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:06 PM
19

The subtlety with which you snuck the words "person" and "he" in there made this elegant. Just pointing it out for those who might have missed it.
/r/PussyPass21/11/14 07:12 PM
75

That is one of the sickest things I've ever read. The link title doesn't do it justice. That woman is a psychopath who tortured this kid for hours, repeatedly hit and stabbed him, did her best to utterly destroy his reputation such that now he's receiving death threats from strangers, and all she got was 10 months of home detention. This is the absolute definition of a pussy pass.
/r/PussyPass21/11/14 04:18 PM
13

Attempted murder.
/r/PussyPass16/11/14 06:33 PM
16

Every person who was involved in punishing this boy, including the teacher and those above her, should be reprimanded in front of all of the children who saw them going after this boy. Children, both males and females, are being taught horrible life lessons from instances like this.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:11 PM
1

"...Hunter Yelton, a first grader in Canon City, Colo., and a young girl had a crush on each other ...KRDO says that Hunter admitted that what he did might have been wrong" Training the boys of today to believe in college that they raped the girl who got drunk, came onto them, and regretted it later.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:07 PM
7

Thank you for posting this. This is an extremely important issue for men, and it arises from a systemic social problem that men must become aware of and deal with before any major improvements for men will be successful. The male suicide problem is, to a very large extent, a result of the gynocentric world we live in. In a very broad way, girls and women are made to feel valuable simply for existing, while boys and men are taught that they need to prove their worth. Women are taught that they ar…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:16 PM
1

It's common knowledge among MRAs that a large percentage of men paying child support did not choose to have a child. Often, men are tricked into it when women pierce condoms, stop taking birth control, etc., but even worse is when men are forced to pay child support for children their wife had with another man, even when the man divorced the woman the moment he found out about the affair. This happens a lot. I do agree with you that women should have the right to choose whether what's basically …
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:08 PM
7

The cost to the state and prison system should be so high that every time this happens, it significantly hurts, so much that they'll make an effort for false imprisonment to not happen.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:01 PM
1

No person is forced to provide blood, nourishment, or any other use of their body to anyone else. Well, you know, except for men who are forced to provide child support, and boys who are forced into labor and/or war, to name a few.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:20 PM
-1

This is one of the best posts I've seen in a while. The picture posted may not be perfect, but it's a huge step in the right direction. More people need to speak up about the fact that men are the ones being oppressed. I know that feels like too big of a jump even for many MRAs, but it's the truth. Men have always sacrificed their lives doing the hardest and most dangerous work, including being responsible for the defense of the females, while the females stay home and/or forage/shop/socialize. …
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:34 PM
3

The spirit of the law contradicts the letter of the law. That is often the case. It makes it easier for them to keep terrible laws on the books, because they convince people that the spirit of the law is pretty good, and obviously no one would abuse it. Then, they use the letter of the law in 99% of cases.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 07:14 PM
2

Snakes and snails and puppy dog tails vs sugar and spice and everything nice. Programming from early childhood.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:24 PM
7

OP did it perfectly. The point is to make use of one of the other mainstream media narratives. In this case, it's the idea that black people are more violent and kill white people. It's like the anti-anti-rape posters, where they replaced the "men are rapists" narrative and the tag line, "Don't be that guy" with the "black people are thieves" narrative and the tag line, "Don't be that black guy." When you do this, it helps bring the reader outside of the narrative where it's much easier to see h…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:41 PM
3

I'd say in the first decade of 2000 also. While some men have always been slightly awake, and that did increase with the rise of the internet, I've only noticed very strong awakening in men with the rise of the Men's Rights movement. Most men were either still buying into feminist propaganda or were feeling too outnumbered to speak up until recently.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:34 PM
21

Yep, I was also going to bring up Queen Isabella, responsible for the slaughter of millions in search of gold.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:30 PM
6

That's so dead-on, exactly what they say constantly in various ways. Side (off-topic) note: Even though I have you at +32 (of course most people in this thread are at +something for me), I only just noticed your user name. 46 & 2 is an awesome song, both for the sound and the meaning. I listened to it for the first time in a year about two weeks ago, and it's been going through my head a lot lately.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:24 PM
2

You're correct, and I think most people here understand that. My post was long enough that I felt it wouldn't be helpful to add a lot of little clarifications on everything I was saying. I meant that if you applied the feminist definitions and reversed the genders and gender effects (which would of course mean engulfment would be rape). I think most people who read my post understood what I meant, but it might have been worth adding that line. Really, it's all about where you draw the line in wh…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 08:54 AM
20

It's important to note that, by the definitions feminists use, you were sexually assaulted by women twice (or more, you may have blown off much older incidents even as they occurred). From what I've read and all of the guys I've talked with honestly about this, my opinion is that over 2/3 of all men have been sexually assaulted by women, and over 25% have been raped by women, if you use the feminist definitions of these terms. Most men just blow it off, or rationalize it away. I know that's true…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:42 PM
1

didn't these girls know that I might become a rapist any second? What he said was, "didn't these girls know that I might become a rapist any second?" He meant that, even though he (his conscious identity) would never do something like that, his mom had trained him so thoroughly that he was a rapist just because he was male, he had to believe that something subconscious/magical/mysterious beyond his control would take over at some point and make him a rapist against his will. He was avoiding cont…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:51 PM
1

Nope, it's clear he was murdered right there in the video. The guy propped a corpse up on his knee. The EMTs probably started CPR and such when they arrived, but he was already dead. He just wasn't declared legally dead until the doctors determined that there was no point in keeping up the life support on a corpse anymore.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:17 AM
1

It's obvious in the video that they were aware they just killed him and that they didn't really care. How many other innocent people have these guys killed? Nobody knows. Did they enjoy the rush of power in at least some of those instances? Maybe. The fact that they didn't care about murdering a guy means they are almost certainly sociopaths, maybe psychopaths.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:01 AM
1

This is only true because people have let the corrupt government define what weaponry is allowed. The Constitution is clear: the right to bear arms. It's not the right to bear specific types of weapons. At the time, anything the military could use, any citizen could legally own. That is still the highest (Constitutional) law in the U.S., regardless of what lower, illegitimate laws say. You have the right to bear any kind of arms, and more people should be pushing that limit. If even a small but …
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:47 AM
1

Chervenko was making a reference to Judge Dredd, which is a story about a dystopian future in which cops are given completely leeway to act as judge and executioner. He was saying the exact same thing you said, though he said it with sarcastic humor instead of clear statements. Both methods have their value.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:14 AM
1

And remember, they blatantly murdered this man because he said he did nothing wrong and wouldn't show his ID. Not one sensible person in the world would think what they did was standard procedure, nor that it was right in any way. They completely took away his ability to breathe for several minutes, both with pepper spray, a twisting of the neck, and the weight of five men. Even after he was motionless for several minutes and they had him cuffed, they stayed on him, likely to make sure he was de…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:04 AM
2

More importantly, everyone knows that these murders will almost certainly never see a jail cell, and even if they did, it would only be for 10% of the time an average citizen would serve. The whole system needs to be redone. I'm tired of hearing all of the shills say "Just prosecute them," "let the system work," "vote for changes," and other nonsense. That literally does nothing, since they nearly always get away with it and the entire system is 95% corrupt. It's the same as saying, "Just buy th…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:03 AM
1

Call it what it is: murder, or at least manslaughter. Without justification, they did several things to this man with full knowledge and understanding that he could easily die from them. Of course they'll claim justification and ignorance of how these actions can and do kill people regularly, but those are obvious lies.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:35 AM
4

It reminds me of the screen caps that someone posted a few weeks ago where a girl said that any guy who wants a girl to shave her pubes is a pervert who wants her to look like a preteen, with another screen cap of a girl mocking a guy for his beard. It amazes me how blind they can be to their double standards. Edit: I just thought I'd add: Besides being able to actually see the area clearly, there's a reason a clean shaven woman is preferred by most men. While a man's genitals are still accessib…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:17 AM
2

Very insightful and well written! A lot of feminists seem believe the lies that men don't have feelings. They think it's "cool" to come in here and purposely provoke, or ask obviously provocative/charged questions. What they don't realize is that it's the difference between trying to play rough with a happy dog you know well, and trying to play rough with a strange dog that's been abused. You'd think it would only be common sense to handle people you don't know with respect and care, especially …
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:37 PM
7

I was reading these comments, and thinking, "Wow, why wouldn't you embrace someone who has seen the light and now works for the betterment of all?" But I went back and read the article more closely, and now realize that the people asking questions like the one you're asking really didn't read it closely. She starts off right at the beginning by stating that she's still a feminist. She really only sees a problem with this one particular situation and "the current climate," and that's only because…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:57 PM
2

Actually, it asks whether his feelings toward the women he knows are because "the ones he knows act like this," not because he happened to see three women acting like this and he judges all women based on those three.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:21 AM
1

You're mostly correct, though it could be argued that this is more of a plutocracy than an oligarchy. Most of the real power and influence in our society is exerted by those who hold great wealth. In an oligarchy, a person usually has power due to birthright or membership in a specific group. Both apply to our society in certain ways. But your main point, that the majority are controlled by the few, is absolutely correct either way. However, what I was describing is the social system that causes…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 07:35 PM
0

We don't live in a patriarchy. This is a matriarchy. That's what causes this kind of stuff. Very simply, everyone, male and female, is programmed to believe: male = bad, worthless; female = good, valuable. Because of this matriarchal brainwashing, people who haven't woken up yet reflexively think the inferior male was offered sex by a better, and totally gloss over the fact that she molested him. Remember also that this subreddit is plagued by feminists. Out of hundreds of posts in this sub, I d…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:52 PM
1

Thank you so much for this link. It's by far the most comprehensive list of useful data I've seen that supports the idea that we need people working for men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:15 PM
4

I got hit with this in first grade. Boys hitting boys: no problem. Girls hitting girls: no problem. Girls hitting boys: no problem. Boy gets hit by girl and hits her back: ass beating (so hard I couldn't walk afterward) with a thick wooden paddle as big as I was. What a "nice" lady that teacher was. I ended up being an A student for most of my scholastic career, had about a half-dozen teachers over the years who still treated me like garbage anyway, all of which were female. All of the male teac…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 01:06 PM
2

Eats, I have you tagged as "Awesome," and have upvoted 28 of your comments. I really wish people would let go of the whole left vs right thing. I share some conservative traits, but overall, I consider myself a liberal/progressive. I agree strongly with just about everything I've ever read from you. Please don't assume it's always liberals who are disagreeing with you, and conservatives who are agreeing. You make great, logical points, and logical minds agree with you.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:32 PM
1

I went looking for this. According to tvtropes, it was treated with very little respect: Orson's ex-wife drugs him, rapes him, and tries to get pregnant to force them back into marriage. Though Bree does call it rape, it's mostly played straight/for laughs (no trauma, no shock, no nothing). One can only imagine the internet backdraft if Orson was the rapist. At the very least when Bree finds out she is so disgusted and furious that she punches the bitch to the floor on the spot. The best thing a…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 08:34 AM
3

I'm fairly new here, and this is actually my first post, but I just had to speak up because it seems very clear to me. I started occasionally reading this subreddit about six months ago, and joined Reddit because of it about four months ago. I agree strongly with most of what I read in here, and I started verbalizing my feelings about men's rights a while back, so I guess I'm starting to identify as an MRA. I've been familiar with the feminist movement for most of my life. From what I've witness…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 08:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter