TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UniversityEastern542 Archive

View 3 posts and 63 comments by UniversityEastern542 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Mods and admins are "women can do no wrong" style liberals who suppress men's rights advocacy and endorse feminist ideologies.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 02:33 PM
10

Men's rights need to promoted in the same, general sense that LGBT rights have been over the past twenty years. Progressives have been relatively successful at promoting LGBT rights (or at least gay/lesbian rights) as a broad spectrum social issue. Currently, advocating for men's rights falls outside the overton window. It is considered weird or abnormal. Gaining mainstream acceptance is important towards normalizing men's rights advocacy in society. As a gay man, you have a powerful voice in pr…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:29 PM
16

Exactly. People mature in relationships and grow through shared experiences. This runway is shorter than people realize. Time is a resource. Even if you did, for instance, find someone you got along with really well at 35, it doesn't change the fact that you're 35 and a lot of the potential to share life experiences together has already passed. First of all, it can be hard to amalgamate lifestyles after a certain age, regardless of the willingness of both parties. As I've gotten older, it's beco…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 03:08 PM
9

At its core, stratification of society is to blame. Children are expensive and the cost of living in developed countries is too high. We would need a complete reversal of the incentive structure to prioritize family formation, because our current system disincentivizes childbirth in almost every way. she had contemplated the idea for four years and was ultimately 'waiting for Mr. Right to come along'. It's crazy that these women couldn't secure "Mr. Right" when they were 20 and hot, and now thin…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 02:52 PM
2

Acceptance is liberation. Exactly. Gender relations is a field that needs to be navigated, regardless of whether you are aware of the pitfalls or not. Think of TRP as the fog being lifted; you are just more aware of your environment and how to navigate it.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/24 12:08 PM
2

You are clearly eloquent. Don't be afraid to make your case to the principal if this continues, and stand your ground.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 11:51 PM
3

Not my demographic but this is quality stuff. I had lots of Indian friends in uni and they failed to give off any sexual energy whatsoever (and some of them gave off too much), they would fall into these categories. Not all Indian dudes but a lot of first generation ones. Surprised this sub is so hostile.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/24 12:42 AM
26

Facts. "Be yourself" is one of the worst pieces of advice given to young men (usually from women, who completely lack understanding of why being yourself only works for women and select, model-tier men), because ambition and self-improvement are important for both personal and romantic success. People admire those who are intrinsically driven. However, if you start moulding yourself to align with the fickle whims of women, you've already lost. This is why "holding frame" is one of the TRP concep…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/24 02:16 PM
25

This. Our society's gender roles, as they currently stand, are highly beneficial to women. Broadly speaking, women don't have to do hard labor, are treated with kid gloves by the justice system, don't have to fight wars, and have more parental rights if they have children. It's not so much male "role models," it's anyone that challenges existing gender norms in favor of men. Feminists are only in favor of changing gender roles in society when it benefits them. Men can have "role models," but onl…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:56 PM
8

If you talk to women, many are actually quite sympathetic to men's issues. Especially if they're mothers. It's the loud minority of misandrists that hog the limelight.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 12:57 AM
26

This. Women leave if they think they can do better. It is easier to get a new woman to love and respect you than to win back one who no longer does. Either be her first option or none at all.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/24 10:57 AM
6

On the dating app Bumble, Ms. Bairachna liked the looks of a hipster. But when she scrolled through his photographs, she noticed his amputated leg. “I looked at his profile for 15 minutes and felt so sorry for him,” Ms. Bairachna, 35, a marketing director for a clothing brand in Kyiv, said in an interview. She wondered if she could handle a relationship with a maimed war veteran. Then she swiped left, removing him from potential matches. “I feel I’m not ready for that.” Imagine how fucking shall…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 10:10 AM
10

All on point. My indirect strategy example is an art gallery; you admire an art piece, she admires the same art piece, you tell her a story about the art piece to break the ice and go from there. The art is central to the entire interaction, and makes it seem spontaneous, not like you're interested in her. It's difficult to explain why this works, but most women's kneejerk reaction to this type of interaction is more positive, especially if they're attractive.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/24 11:25 AM
73

Winston never even had a chance lol. why do we women have to descend to that same unevolved view that one gender has to be on top? That's what feminism is. It's not called egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 12:37 PM
-5

You're giving the female hivemind too much credit. Women desire men (or in this case, a boy) who media and other women have deemed attractive. This is especially true for teen/preteen women, whose sexuality is still being formed and can be shaped with marketing and propaganda. You could convince preteen women that dating an ogre was cool, given enough money and influence.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 09:47 PM
17

Most women I know don't even care to inquire too deeply about their man's prior dating/sexual history (I don't volunteer such information either, talking about exes is gross and disrespectful in general imo). Should they? Perhaps, it seems the research indicates so. But in practice, males engage in mate guarding to a much more aggressive degree than females. So even if, strictly speaking, promiscuity isn't desirable in either sex when it comes to relationship quality, it matters a lot less on th…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/24 09:58 PM
9

Mate guarding is a completely natural human activity and it is not strange or weird that men are disgusted or offended by a woman with a history of promiscuity. I think everyone subconsciously knows this, which is why women hide it - it only continues to be a matter of debate because aging, "experienced" women want to pollute the discourse on the subject, so they are seen as more desirable. On a physical level, it means many men have ejaculated inside that woman. Literally disgusting. Repugnant,…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/24 09:39 PM
5

Most feminists are aware that men, in general, are not the problem. Attempts to blame men for increasing divorce rates and decreasing relationship satisfaction, despite women having more control and influence over relationships and dating than any other point in history, are arguments made in bad faith to demonize men, because "opposite sex bad" is trope that always sells. Admitting that women are just as, if not more complicit, in the destruction of the family unit and traditional relationships…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 04:42 PM
1

Dude, stop talking with randos online, you're going to get blackmailed or worse.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 01:38 PM
47

While it doesn't make their behavior okay, what astounds me is how bad their tactics tend to be. Some of these influencers tell women to "hang out where wealthy men hang out," place like golf clubs or high end restaurants. That's not the worst tactic, but if wealthy men see a woman loitering around these places, they are more likely to think she's a prostitute than a potential partner. They're also going to ask questions about her background, and immediately figure out she's not about that lifes…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:24 PM
90

As a dude who actually has "accomplished" most of the things listed in the article (financial independence, tertiary education, etc.), there is decreasing motivation for young men to accomplish anything that doesn't serve their hedonistic, short term interests. Even if you achieve "adulthood," your reward is working a soul-crushing corporate job (where you'll be heavily discriminated against during the hiring process) that barely pays a sustenance wage, to make yourself eligible to date vapid, p…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 12:38 PM
10

The entire purpose of a relationship is to support each other physically, emotionally, spiritually. If you can't do that, you're useless as a partner and it shouldn't be a surprise when your relationships fail.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 09:42 AM
0

Most guys, no matter how attractive, are now being treated like predators for pursuing women and expected to settle for women far less attractive and socially/financially successful than them. There is still a fair number of women who are exceptions, and you don't want to alienate them, so try not to judge. However, I do agree that, in general, there's a lot of average to slightly-above-average women who are letting attention from the internet and online dating get to their heads. There's recent…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 10:23 PM
4

I have asked her to escalate this to HR as I have nothing to hide and, on the contrary, feel this is a case of coordinated slander. While I empathize with your situation, I think you really fucked up here. In the current atmosphere, accusations of gender discrimination are "guilty until proven innocent" in the eyes of HR (another gynocentric department), so it's difficult to see what you have to gain from escalating this. I concur with others that it sounds like someone is prepping the ground to…
/r/MensRights28/12/23 09:49 AM
2

There will be a niche market but this statement it’ll be another test of whether heterosexual men are actually willing to share the responsibilities of adult life is self-righteous nonsense. For one, women already occupy a very privileged place by virtue of being able to give birth; they don't have to fight wars, go to jail less often, are treated to free food and accommodations, etc., all because they have vaginas and can give birth. Women get a lot of benefits, so managing the risks is fully t…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 03:24 PM
24

Marriage 3.0 still hands men the lion’s share of benefits Doubtful. Also, this article has some of the worst examples of couples - reality TV couples are about as far removed from the standard family as one can get. Anyways, there's been a slew of articles bemoaning the state of dating for women lately, as well as the rise of a bunch of Tate-style female influencers, who tie themselves in knots to try and get what they want out of relationships that could never work to begin with. The millennial…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:47 PM
18

Quality info. The point about online misogyny is interesting, because I'd largely blame reddit for the perception that inceldom is a cause of online anti-feminism, which isn't the case in the slightest, and probably rooted in the belief that misogynists don't talk to enough women, which is some bad reasoning. Some of the guys I know with the most experience with women are also the most critical of women's behavior. People who spend time around women and observe their behavior know women are just…
/r/MensRights27/11/23 04:31 PM
14

Western women are promiscuous, hedonistic, and frankly, kind of disgusting. You'd be naive to put your confidence in one.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 12:10 AM
2

Because the men they have sex with only want sex. Women are attracted to easy-going, non-judgmental dudes, but fail to see the reason that they're so non-judgmental is because they don't care about them at all, so who she is or what she does is irrelevant to them. They also tend to select for the top men they can attract, who naturally have a lot of options and are unlikely to choose them.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:06 PM
13

Apex fallacy. The vocal minority you talk about is hyperfixated on the top 20% of men in terms of looks, status, or wealth. The bottom 80% are invisible to them.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 08:45 AM
18

The assumption from women, and often men, is that men who complain about prejudices or social inequities are unable to compete. It's a "skill issue" and never a problem with the game. Only women are allowed to complain about the game.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 10:42 AM
8

Contrary to the article, while modern men have their issues, I suspect the rise of "situationships" and men's reluctance to commit to anything serious is a symptom of how bad western women have become for relationships. They are promiscuous, unhealthy, entitled, throughly onboard the hedonic treadmill, and don't put much effort into their relationships unless the person they're pursuing is way out of their league. In an age of social media, no fault divorce laws and metoo, dating these women is …
/r/MensRights13/11/23 11:27 PM
128

People are realizing that dating apps suck and have ruined the dating market. Yeah, they've helped some people find love but the price paid is that the rest of the heterosexual population is caught in an endless loop of speed-dating where shitty, low effort people win and decent people become frustrated and lose. Tinder is just as bad. Hinge is still early along enough in its adoption cycle that it still has decent people, they aren't fucking with the algorithms and pushing monetization too much…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 11:19 AM
3

No, not at all. I'll preface this by saying that I don't berate women over a past they can't change, but I appreciate when women are honest about it (most women are not, because they know it matters) so we can both move on quickly. For one, women judge men over the most minute details of their behavior, looks, and personality. Men having a couple basic criteria, like not having slept with dozens of men and being somewhat interesting to talk to, and having the courage to openly express these in a…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 12:31 PM
20

The answer from them is because “they don’t have to” but the real answer is because women are literally the biggest pussies ever There is aspects of both at play but this is definitely true. I recently rejected a coworker (my standards for women aren't super high but this lady is not attractive, we have little in common besides her ogling me, and she's ten years my senior) and she completely flipped out, saying "fuck you, I'll find someone else" (please do) and "you won't find someone like me" (…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 09:51 AM
6

Interesting stuff, saved. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 10:30 PM
21

Any fraternal organization that allows women to join is not a men's/boys' organization at all, and frankly, not worthy of existing. It's not always women's fault, but having women in the group completely fucks up the fraternal bonding process and makes shit awkward. Even if all the men play it cool, you can no longer speak as freely. Even worse, it only takes one dude deciding to become a comedian or athlete now that the ladies have shown up to completely wreck the group dynamic. We are sorely l…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:50 PM
14

Unironically this. We complain about how awful our modern dating culture has become, yet governments turn courtship into this high stakes game where women can arbitrarily decide if they feel harassed or threatened and do immense damage to your professional or social relationships if they feel like they weren't treated appropriately (which is completely subjective to how attractive you are and how they feel when they woke up that day). At the very least, women should be subject to the same penalt…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 11:26 AM
7

Women only organizations: 😊🥰👍 Men only organizations: 😡🤢❌
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:34 PM
3

This split seems civil, but with regards to OP's title, I always laugh when women posit that men failing to make a relationship work was a lack of "manliness" or failing to "keep her in her place" or some other nonsense like that, and that looking for signs of disloyalty in potential partners is "insecurity." If she's a whore or has a string of failed, low quality relationships, run. There have been men who held the world in the palm of their hand, were the best in the world at what they did, an…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 07:14 AM
2

Women have difficulty conceptualizing sexually unattractive men as human beings, so no, they're not great therapists.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 12:05 AM
15

I've noticed a couple major double-standards that are completely inappropriate: Some women think it's okay for them to have male friends (male friends can theoretically be fine, but the vast majority of "male friends" are orbiters disguised as friends who they like getting attention from) or to hang out with their exes (who is somehow also a "friend"), but flip their shit if you talk to another woman, even amicably. Either fraternizing with the opposite sex is okay or it's not, there's no in-bet…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:12 AM
6

Body count 100% matters and don't listen to anyone who tells you otherwise. Women invest the most in early relationships and invest less in later relationships. They become distracting and unreliable as partners. Some are so experienced with breakups that they have a breakup strategy. While it doesn't diminish their worth as people, a high body count or extensive romantic experience absolutely damages most women's prospects as a romantic partner to you. Most experienced women are incredibly jade…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:03 AM
8

I'm not certain his boundaries were reasonable (she's a surfer whose entire career is posing in thong bikinis, obviously she wasn't going to stop doing that) but you're allowed to set whatever boundaries you want in a relationship. I like the sheer irony of how a man setting boundaries is automatically labelled "controlling" and "narcissistic" and somehow merits public shaming, while most modern women will throw a fit if they catch a male partner talking to other women or liking other women's ph…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 05:03 PM
2

Personally, I don't make any hard rules surrounding love, but I'd be exceedingly cautious with any woman who was married or had a child with another man, mitigating circumstances aside. As in we'd need to be together for 7-10 years (already too long for many women) and really tied at the hip/soulmates in order for it to happen, and even then it would only be to please her. Even then, it might not be possible. Love makes you do irrational things, but that's pretty irrational IMO.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 05:06 PM
2

It's not a disqualifier for dating, but the data clearly shows that second marriages are more likely to end in divorce. Marrying someone who has a track record of walking away from "for life" commitments is dumb. They may very well have been justified in that decision, and you can still love them, but marriage is not on the table for me. They have demonstrably proven that they either won't stick it out, or don't know what they want.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 04:44 PM
7

What's ironic is that a lot of your criticisms are about women wanting commitment too early, yet your other points demand early commitment from them You can be loyal to a relationship physically and not be on a fast track to get married. There exists rational middle ground between being a hookup artist and needing to move towards marriage now. You barely even know someone unless you've been seeing them for two years. you're sussing each other out to see if you would be a good fit for a multi-yea…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 11:35 AM
7

You need to be okay with her past, present, and future. They all matter. No exceptions.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 02:58 AM
9

Society views women as having an external locus of control - things happen to them, they are passive actors. Society views men as having an internal locus of control - men's outcomes in life are within their control. Therefore, if you're a man, all your problems must be your own fault, whereas women are always seen as unfortunate victims of circumstance even when they're not. Men are also highly competitive amongst each other and don't do enough to advance the lives and careers of men around the…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:26 PM
2

They are brainwashed from birth by feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 01:06 AM
11

"We should bully these people"
/r/MensRights15/06/23 07:26 PM
15

I don't particular like or hate Andrew Tate but most of his content is parroting generic red pill stuff that circulated anonymously on forums five years ago. He comments on anything and everything, so it's not particularly hard to show people enough clips and he'll eventually say something they kinda, sorta agree with. A lot of his content is also generic "improve yourself," hustle culture, "ignore women, acquire currency", etc. commentary too. It's not misogynistic and, ultimately, meaningless.…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 05:11 PM
1

It may be the algorithms but I've noticed a big spike in the number of male-oriented social commentators. Usually either "female dating coaches" (30-something women who finally found out that men have feelings and seek validation too), or Tate-style content creators that push hustle-culture bs, where working out and pouring effort into ill-defined business ideas is supposed to magically result in material success. In regards to that particular commentator, I don't find her content particularly g…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 08:56 AM
9

While women claim Men are constantly talking about them, that's projection. In private my female "friends" tell me not only viceral sex details that I never asked for but also about how much they hate and want to kill all men because "insert man here" was "creepy" to them as a kid. It's ironic that society sometimes stereotypes men as "always thinking about sex," but when you spend any significant time around women, you realize how their entire worldview is informed by their relationships with m…
/r/MensRights23/05/23 05:33 AM
26

Many of them just say this idiotic shite because they can and no one will stop them. Women are emotionally driven and once they're comfortable enough around you, will say whatever dumb shit crosses their minds. There's no logic behind it, it's verbal diarrhea that spews forth uncontrollably.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 05:18 AM
2

Most people here are still not vocal enough.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 08:44 AM
18

The entire "egg freezing" trend is hilarious. Most of the women doing it are already in their late 20s or early 30s, if not older. IVF success rates are abysmal, less than 40% after 35. It's copium from aging women who can't accept that they're probably already too old to form a stable family unit and are desperately trying to buy time they don't have. It's sad.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 05:53 PM
14

The main motivators for men to hold down a solid 9-5 are gone. Pay is mediocre. In many areas, you can't buy a property on a single income. You won't have a pension. You aren't going to be a male breadwinner for a family, since most couples can't afford children, or even ensure access to sex (in fact, you might be less likely to have reproductive success compared to underemployed dudes that can put more energy into pursuing women). Most jobs worth having are extremely competitive and probably bi…
/r/MensRights14/04/23 07:42 AM
18

This is completely backwards. "Incels" aren't around women in any intimate sense. That's the entire reason they're incels. The most common perpetrators of violence against women are spouses or intimate partners, who are, by definition, not incels.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 12:44 PM
18

Plenty of men who hate women get laid all the time. All sorts of dudes have been on a date with a chick, thought "I hate this bitch," and had sex with her anyways.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 12:42 PM
15

This. To put a positive spin on it, it reflects well on OP's value as a man that these women get catty over him. Sadly, this is incredibly juvenile behavior.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 07:53 PM
2

Seek help if you need it, brothers.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:41 AM
-2

Agreed. We're moving towards becoming a much more fractured and individualistic society, which will involve finding some "middle ground" in gender relations, as opposed to the current online attitude, which is mostly focused on "winning" or embarrassing others. This process will be stressful and involve both genders giving up some privileges that they have historically enjoyed. It sucks that any sub that wants to maturely discuss those issues immediately devolves into shaming, name-calling, or m…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 12:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter