TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Unkn0wnNinja Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by Unkn0wnNinja on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

She was not distributing. It was medically prescribed.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 12:12 PM
2

Again, NOT saying she shouldn't be punished. I'm saying the punishment doesn't fit the crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 12:12 PM
-1

Again, not saying she's innocent, I'm saying she's being punished to a degree I don't morally think is right.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 11:26 AM
-5

Just because that's the way it is, doesn't mean that's the way it should be. That's the entire point of my comments.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 11:22 AM
-11

That's a misleading statement, it depends what you bring over.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 11:21 AM
-26

That still is no reason for a 9 year sentence. If a certain fruit is illegal and I take it across the border, it's still smuggling. Just because you slap a different name on it doesn't make it worse.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 11:10 AM
-5

Just because she knowingly broke the law, doesn't mean she deserve 9 years. Everyone judges everything by their own standards and morals, that's how judgement works.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 11:09 AM
-10

But my argument is that she doesn't deserve the sentence she was given, not that she's innocent.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 11:01 AM
-1

Speeding is breaking the law, should that carry a decade sentence?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 10:49 AM
4

Yeah, she does not deserve prison time at all, much less 9 fucking years. This is sort of fucked up that people are acting like she did something terrible.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 10:43 AM
1

Well, I'm sorry you're irritated, but I did nothing to warrant such a response. You didn't address any of my argument either. The first amendment does not protect threats either, accompanied with the fact that they implied they were going to commit a terrorist attack after claiming to be apart of a terrorist organization. Again, implications are a real thing, even in the legal system.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/22 04:43 PM
1

Yes it is. First of all, being a part of a terrorist organization is illegal within itself. Next, implications are real. The law WILL use that tweet to show you IMPLIED you were going to commit an illegal act/you intended to commit an illegal act. You don't have to explicitly say you're going to do something illegal for it to be illegal. For example, if I say "you might want to do this for me before something bad happens" based on context, that can be illegal if the court decides I tried to use …
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/22 04:07 PM
0

Technically it is. She claimed to be from a terrorist organization, then afterwards claimed she was going to "do something big". That leaves more than reasonable doubt as you what she was referring to
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/22 03:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter