TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UnknownArchive Archive

View 0 posts and 206 comments by UnknownArchive on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If I can do it, you can do it.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 10:23 PM
2

Wait, I not only have to defend my devil's advocate position, I need to provide you with your argument too?
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:41 PM
2

Article is 14 years old. Uses Dr. Steve Salvatore as a medical reference. (a celeb doctor like Dr. Oz) Provides no peer reviewed studies or sources.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:25 PM
1

Fox news. Really? I searched out the article for the source, and as per usual for fox news it was damn hard to follow. However I did manage to track it down, and all it is is an article stating the obvious need for pain relief for circumcision. It in no way supports a view that it's common practice to not use any.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:13 PM
1

Also, I asked a family member-in-law who works on video editing and such for various companies about the video: http://i.imgur.com/pRfJg.png Take it at face value in this day and age of fake screenshots, but those who deal with video editing might understand and be able to explain in further detail. But from the looks of things the video is possibly 20-25 years old.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:03 PM
0

Again from an anti-circumcision source. Do you have ANY sources from medical journals or peer reviewed studies? I also have a HUGE problem accepting the words of a single medical doctor, especially one who supports homeopathic medicine.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:53 PM
1

I haven't attacked anything. If you feel attacked, then you have a personal feeling you need to deal with. Just because someone provides an alternative view. And that link provided nothing new. I read the FAQ. It only sources things that support your argument, and from sources who believe the same thing. That's not good citations, that's borderline propaganda pushing. Claiming someone is "attacking" something by debating it's counterpoint is a pretty dirty way of dealing with disagreement.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:30 PM
1

Source? I'd like to see where in the first world this is done without pain relief.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:09 PM
0

[3] : A graphic video intended to scare/gross out people Also, for reference in the future when someone brings up that old (and yes, it is very old) video, make sure to refer them to this: http://i.imgur.com/vAd6R.png The video has been edited to increase the volume of the child screaming. I have also shot the video link to my doctor (To ask if this is normal) and a family member who does video editing professionally. (To date how old & what era this video comes from) I am fairly sure there will…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 07:36 PM
-2

Other side of the coin, since these types of things seem to be very biased and often filled with false sources & facts: FALSE: It's mutilation, not a medical procedure By that logic getting your tonsils out is throat mutilation. It's a medical procedure. It is done by medical staff, in hygienic and ethical ways. Source: Kaiser pediatrics FALSE: It causes loss of sensitivity! No it doesn't. Not only has that been DISPROVEN, there was no real evidence or studies to begin with. Source: Adult Circum…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 07:17 PM
1

very, very nice. Bravo.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 06:50 PM
1

and?
/r/MensRights18/07/11 02:28 AM
1

Why not, he was responsible for it's creation, whydo we have a double standard there?
/r/MensRights18/07/11 02:01 AM
1

As much as I hate to see any guy entrapped by female lies, the reality is we are biologically different. This is an example of something that cannot be altered. Should a man have to pay for a child? Sorry, but yes. If you take the risk, you have to be ready to accept the responsibility. If men got pregnant too, it would be a different world. But the fact is that this is one of those cases we cannot solve.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 01:10 AM
1

Guilty? Most likely. Pussy pass? Uhhhh, I have no idea where you pulled that from, it seems a bit silly in this case.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 09:03 PM
2

I had a friend on facebook who confronted me for saying they were stupid attention whoring pleas. She stated she was going to one we had locally. I defriended her.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 09:50 AM
2

check original post.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 01:23 PM
-1

Sonic Cult?
/r/MensRights27/05/11 08:04 PM
-1

Amen brother
/r/MensRights27/05/11 06:40 PM
1

That's opinion, as such it is disingenuous. (Correct use) Also, babydick obsession has it's own reddit now: http://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/
/r/MensRights27/05/11 01:44 AM
-7

You can't argue with someone who has EVIDENCE of their position. Enjoy: It's mutilation, not a medical procedure. By that logic getting your tonsils out is throat mutilation. It's a medical procedure. Source: Kaiser pediatrics It's a conspiracy by doctors to get money Doctors are bound by laws, guidelines, and ethics. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. To claim that they are working a carnival game approach to rip people off for money is just silly. There are millions of doctors in the US alo…
/r/MensRights25/05/11 11:15 AM
-8

Cutting off the clitoral hood is almost unheard of anymore, other then cosmetically, and done on purpose by women. The removal of a tiny flap of skin from the male organ has an overwhelming amount of medical advantages. It's a non-issue. It's a stupid issue.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 08:52 AM
6

What a scumbag.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 07:56 AM
-10

This subreddit has recently gone from equality issues & male subjectiveness to "PROTECT INFANT DICK!" Is this really where to pull the male abuse card? Dick flaps? 89% of murdered infants are murdered by their mothers. a hair away from 9/10. Why is there no concern or interest in routine followups of single mothers to check on their mental wellbeing? Why aren't all mothers forced to submit to testing before they bring a live infant home? 2 MILLION children are circumcised each year. 117 have die…
/r/MensRights25/05/11 07:44 AM
1

Yeah, sadly the downvote patrol got here first.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 09:44 PM
1

I doubt that had anything to do with her gender.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 08:06 PM
5

Well, do the same thing you just did. Example, man speaking to a woman on the internet: "I've tracked down your address, and I am going to put a bullet in your stupid fucking head!" Now read as a woman speaking to a man: "I've tracked down your address, and I am going to put a bullet in your stupid fucking head!" Don't think for one second that women are any less likely to attack you, stalk you, or even murder you. Remember that there's a clear female centric slant to the media, and unless a wom…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 08:51 AM
3

See, this is the type of critical thinking and issue of importance I like to read around here.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 08:47 AM
-1

This doesn't strike me as a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 05:09 AM
0

lol
/r/MensRights22/05/11 10:38 AM
0

yeah, got it. Go fail at trolling elsewhere. You're not doing much more than spamming atm
/r/MensRights22/05/11 10:19 AM
1

You're somewhat amusing, in a facepalm kind of way.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 09:59 AM
0

No, I'm kinda irritated you're acting like such an ass. Really? Mocking? Really? That's the best you have to offer? Silly.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 09:29 AM
0

K. I'll write "hey douchebag!" So you know it's for you.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 08:38 AM
0

oh ok, sorry! lol, I'm so used tot he circlejerk around here I can't tell when people are joking anymore
/r/MensRights22/05/11 08:36 AM
0

Wow, how can I argue with such flawless logic. I was considering lots of use of the word fuck, and perhaps a mom joke or two. But I don't want to provoke your anti-social psychiatric disorders. Next thing you know you'll be in a bell tower.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 03:49 AM
1

It's been a long time since I played "I'm rubber, you're glue"
/r/MensRights22/05/11 03:34 AM
0

I proved everyone wrong, what scientific authority is there other then the scientific authority of my many, many easily accessible medical documents? I'm a shitty human being because I disagree with your opinion? Lol, you're silly.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 03:31 AM
0

Thanks for adding to the conversation. When you can't debate, curse and insult.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 03:25 AM
4

Interesting subject material, but either should be locked up for their consensual sexual exploration with people their own age. All we are teaching them is that sex is something to be punished for. That's not good for either gender. Oh, and your title is very sensationalistic.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 01:42 AM
1

Oh, sorry, "English." Forgot to capitalize.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 01:38 AM
1

How is that freshman year english class working out? Learning a lot? Thanks for sharing some.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 01:37 AM
-1

The child is a child. Every fact I posted is relevant.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 01:36 AM
-5

Because the parents who want to get their baby boys' foreskin cut off are not under pressure and definitely have all the facts. There you go. There's the facts. You MRAs with a chip on your shoulder seem to think hospitals are coming into the delivery room with a knife saying hand over the child. No one is fucking pressured, and hospitals have tons of information on the subject. Much like the link the the kaiser pamphlet I linked. The concept that doctors are out there with a friggin' foreskin f…
/r/MensRights22/05/11 01:33 AM
-2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/hel5w/penis_preservation_prevails_ban_on_male/c1uvrb8
/r/MensRights22/05/11 01:06 AM
1

thank god that was short, I have a low tolerance for propaganda writing.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 11:27 PM
-2

ask and ye shall receive http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/hel5w/penis_preservation_prevails_ban_on_male/c1uvrb8
/r/MensRights21/05/11 10:23 PM
-5

speak of idiots they come out to play
/r/MensRights21/05/11 10:17 PM
-2

Well, I hope they enjoy the horrible outcome. Hope the smug was worth it.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 07:51 PM
-9

Idiots are people who run head on into a situation and pressure others to follow without having all the facts. Don't alter my statement.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 07:45 PM
-14

Christ, not another stupid town. How many of these idiots are out there?
/r/MensRights21/05/11 07:32 PM
1

d'oh!
/r/MensRights21/05/11 04:22 PM
1

I was one of the people who wrote them to speak out against it.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:21 AM
9

Just to show you what it would look like as a post from a masculine counter: (Reading as an anonymous man to anonymous women:) "If the world was the tiniest bit just, or fair, or merciful, or righteous, I would be out there with a knife or a gun hunting you down. I would offer you shoes for forty dollars behind the building and then dispatch you quickly in quiet solitude. I would be kinder than you, because I would only go after adults. I would be kinder than you, because I would do it quickly a…
/r/MensRights21/05/11 02:48 AM
0

Thanks for adding to the conversation
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:13 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/pIOAS.png
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:12 PM
2

Couldn't get that site to work. Took snapshot instead.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:12 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/pIOAS.png
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:12 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/pIOAS.png
/r/MensRights20/05/11 08:12 PM
2

Did you ever read her post where she wrote about killing men?
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:40 PM
1

hahaha, that's great! =)
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:39 PM
1

spitting hateful remarks & often times violence towards men Sorry, fixing my own fuckup there.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:36 AM
-1

Actually I did exactly that. Don't be sore, this isn't about losing, it's about debating unpopular points. Then making educated decisions on the information presented. You selectively picked whatever suited your opinion, then took things out of context that you didn't like. You brought nothing new to the debate you simply wanted to push your opinion. It didn't help.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 06:33 AM
1

I don't count this as a feminist view. I call it the ravings of a lunatic.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 04:00 AM
-2

Right, science has an expiration date, and stops being true when it gets old. No, but it gets better and morc correct. You don't want to have a debate. You've been yelling at people for pulling information FROM YOUR OWN SOURCES, and bashing anyone else's attempts. I have done no such thing. I simply disagreed. If that's the conclusion you have gotten, it's your inference. What's extra funny It's funny? Claiming something is funny is dismissive straight from your own source Every source I have po…
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:59 AM
1

I was well aware of that, I just wanted to prove to myself what I had been feeling recently. I had been under the impression this subreddit was a great idea. But I was curious if they could intelligently & calmly debate their point. As you can see no one could. Some folks had come close, but most tapered off. This was an overwhelming failure, but I wanted to prove the hivemind around here would simply downvote and run.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:48 AM
0

citation?
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:31 AM
1

Citation?
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:31 AM
2

Yeah. You certainly have defended your position with grace and dignity.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:30 AM
-2

I don't understand how that's a benefit. Why don't we remove all appendices at birth so infants 'will not remember the procedure'? Because that is obviously silly, and pointless. Removal of limbs is an obvious far cry from a flap of skin. Removal of limbs also doesn't provide std protection. No it absolutely is not reversible. Yes it is! Read here on how reversing circumcisions is possible. negatively affected my sex life by reducing the sensitivity of my penis I've already posted a good chunk o…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 04:39 PM
-1

You're pulling a strawman, so I'm going to have to cease this and invest my time in more fruitful debating.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 04:31 PM
1

That's accusatory. But I will still attempt to enlighten you by acknowledging the words you used. invasive Invasive in a medical sense means something put into the body. I'm not going to argue semantics, but I'll assume you mean invasive in terms of invading someone else's space. Which all medical procedures are. But as previously stated, as the child will retain no memory of the incident, that point is kind of moot. less costly From what I have seen thusfar on what it costs to fight a nasty UI,…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 04:26 PM
1

Everything on that page is sourced from medical reports. The first thing I see is ""AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN" which hasn't published anything in nearly 20 years. The article they pick from is 32 years old. It is a handful of paragraphs written by a single doctor. (also another thing I explained I wouldn't debate, because single doctors make names for themselves by belting out controversial ideas. The same doctor didn't mention the subject again, and retired/died nearly a decade a…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 04:10 PM
-1

If it were up to me to find logic in now vs. later, one benefit is the obvious factor of the infant will not remember the procedure. In all actuality it is reversible, and I haven't seen enough evidence to say it negatively affects anyone enough to be a point to counter a decision. Like I said, it's all going to come down to the parents and their decisions.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:49 PM
0

Please don't arrange your sentences where the purpose is to make a statement about my character. What's your real reason for your preference for cut baby boys? Sentences such as this are distracting from the debate, and they add very little other than offending another person. I see it, I identify it, and it is transparent. Please use care when debating, this isn't a fight, it's a debate. If I was to turn this crude accusation into a debatable point, I would rephrase it as "Why would you prefer …
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:44 PM
0

cirp.org is an anti-circumcision website. As I stated originally I cannot in good conscious debate references from sites with a pre-defined slant or bias to them. I have purposefully avoided using pro-circumcision websites for the same reason. If you have a medical write up or statistic from a place that's reputable and neutral I'd be willing to investigate it further.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:37 PM
-1

See, I have heard this a number of times, but I have yet to see a citation for this. The closest I've seen is propaganda. As for the money thing, I'll have to backtrack again to the original statement I made about this, which is that's absolutely silly. The consent issue on the other hand is one point I can get behind, and fully understand. I have never been a fan of parents who pierce their infants' ears. I find that to be an unfair decision to make for an infant. But I feel that's a far cry fr…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:30 PM
2

If I am a troll because I'm willing to debate the unpopular choice, then namecall away. However you haven't brought anything to the table then accusations of belittling which I have actively made an effort to avoid. If you feel you've been "shamed" I apologize, that's not how I'm debating. However I will be ending any further conversing with you since you seem to be getting more aggressive and attacking rather than talking. If you calm down and wish to debate further, I'll be willing to listen.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:25 PM
0

This doesn't contribute to the debate.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:22 PM
0

I'm discussing the entirety of the issue. As for what is superior and what isn't, that simply comes down to personal opinion. If I were to look at the benefits versus the flaws, I would say I'd feel comfortable having my child circumcised because I'd view it to be the superior choice. However, this isn't a debate over the semantics of things, it's a debate on pros versus cons.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:22 PM
-1

They might, some of them have been brainwashed from birth to believe that having sexual stimulation is somehow evil and frowned on by [insert deity here] However we're not talking about the systematic sexual repression of third world nations. We are discussing the benefits of circumcision.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:53 PM
0

For the many other benefits listed already.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:32 PM
-1

Why would I do something like that?
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:31 PM
1

ah, ok. spell check didn't pick up on that because it's a different word
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:31 PM
-1

No, I would use multiple studies from many different sources, compare the pros and cons, develop an educated opinion, then proceed.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:21 PM
-2

I guess you're picking out bits and pieces and putting them together the way it suits you. I guess if that citation wasn't enough, here's another. And another. That's just a few more studies talking about how there's a higher chance of cervical cancer when having sex with an uncircumcised man. For more about how the lack of circumcision increases the chance of penile cancer check here.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:20 PM
-4

I didn't see any false claims, I only see what was stated in the study.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:05 PM
-5

I'm here to debate other people with citations and facts. I'm not here to debate myself. As I know those could be the citations at the bottom of a anti-circumcision group's website. I'm sorry, if you're not willing to make an effort to debate your view, I'm going to have to just write this off.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:03 PM
-1

I don't think I said anything of the sort. I believe the studies did though.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 01:01 PM
0

These are the results, in the section marked "results." You seemed to have completely missed the point of what it was they were doing: During the 2-year period reviewed, 62 boys were circumcised for typical cicatrizing pathological phimosis, one 4 years old, the remainder aged 5–14 years. The circumcision specimens were examined histologically in 51 instances, 43 (84%) revealing appearances characteristic of BXO and nine of nonspecific dermal fibrosis. During this same period, 30 boys (aged 0–14…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:57 PM
-3

Anything is when taken out of context. First link: Although an uncircumcised infant has been estimated to have 3 to 20 times the risk of developing a UTI compared to a circumcised infant, the absolute risk increase is about 1% As for the second link, you're right. It does say circumstantial. Then I noticed it was from 13 years ago, so I found you a new citation from the same website created last year Many studies have demonstrated that the frequency of UTI increase in uncircumcised males, especi…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:51 PM
-1

I'm going to have to see some links here.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:39 PM
-6

This is opinion. I don't want my laws developed on opinions. I want them developed on logic and fact.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:27 PM
-2

citations please
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:24 PM
-3

citations please.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:24 PM
5

hahaha you're fun, have an upvote before they bury us both! ;)
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:37 AM
-6

uh oh, better call the downvote army.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:25 AM
-1

Very true, but what amused me the most about this was the fact that the whole reason men and women in the human species even have a concept of being a couple is due to the male gender trying to protect the offspring from the mother.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:15 AM
3

Let's see if I can break a few of you hiveminders. I plan this post to argue FOR circumcision. I really am challenging anyone with a different opinion: Please, bring it to the table. I would love to see my views challenged. It's simple, I will give you every link and study needed to debunk the entirety of the anti-circumcision movement. Just three simple rules if you want to debate it: 1) everything is cited, 2) no citations from pro or anti circumcision groups 3) no studies done by single docto…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:12 AM
-1

I'm sorry, but I have been reading doctors' articles, studies, etc. If anything it's further convince me. Here's an article explaining HIV from a non-biased site. Study done by World Health. Also a bit about bacteria and infections here's a study done by Department of Pediatric Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK showing boys who are circumcized are less likely to suffer urinary tract infections. I think I might just put together something for everyone
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:34 AM
-2

I heard something somewhere sometime about something once too.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:08 AM
-2

Wow, and I had such respect for people in the military who did these long tours of duty in the desert, getting shot at and bombed. Turns out they were all PTSD because of their missing dickflap.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:06 AM
-5

The 200 a year thing is a bit hazy. It states 117 plus consideration for more. Without direct numbers, I can't buy into that statistic that easily. (Plus I am having a lot of difficulty finding that study via google. Do you have a link?) Again, I'm going to put blame on the doctors. Same with all the ways it can get botched. Believe me, while researching this back and forth with you I have seen a lot of botched dongs.(Those are the people who should be angry.) But the 117 confirmed deaths involv…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 09:01 AM
3

I haven't stopped digging but I am having difficulty at the moment. For now here's an article: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/nature/killer-instinct.html In truth, some scholars believe infanticide was an important factor in human evolution. "People have often assumed that the origin of the human pair-bond lay in males providing food for offspring," de Waal says. "But it may have been simpler—they may have just been protecting offspring [from infanticide]." The practice still occurs today among hu…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 08:18 AM
-2

Thanks for the well thought out and polite argument. I always appreciate civility. I do admit I am dismissive because I do find it to be such a non-subject. As for the 200 infants killed a year I'm going to have to ask for citation on that. Medical study, I don't consider a lot of men's sites to be authentic or they come off very liberal with their cherry picking. As for the male/female circumcision, that's a really bad comparison because the two are nothing alike. Female circumcision is an effo…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 07:53 AM
5

Somewhat interesting sidenote: I once was watching a documentary on human evolution, and it was explaining why we find infants to be "cute." It's an evolutionary response to illicit sympathy by other humans, because human females have the highest infanticide & offspring abandonment rates of any primate. Babies have to be cute in order to survive, attracting "new" mothers who will take care of them. Postpartum depression has been around a long, long time. I think I streamed it from netflix, but I…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 07:23 AM
-3

I don't see much of a scar on my dong, where is it usually located? As for "psychologically scarred" I really cannot take that seriously. It's just so silly. And I'm not saying that to be a dick or dismiss your argument, it just really comes off as something blown far out of proportion if you're pulling the "psychologically scarred" card as someone who has been circumcised. As a MRA I DO NOT see a violation of rights. I see a simple elective outpatient procedure. Same as having a mole on your fa…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 07:09 AM
1

She is so epicly pretty it is really, really hard to not just be blown completely the fuck away that she's smart & has morals.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 06:59 AM
2

Actually, you have been overwhelmingly rude, aggressive, and completely ignored every rational and well put together thought this person has put together. And on top of it, instead of debating it, you simply call his position "stupid." Way to completely invalidate your argument.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 06:36 AM
-1

It is incredibly painful You also avoid the concept of area numbing It decreases sexual sensation Could have fooled me in my teen years. Also, this concept was debunked long ago. Every single argument for it is insane(hygiene? are you serious) or debunked. Actually there are significantly higher rates of infection caused by bacteria, regardless of how often the area is washed. It is something that a man can do when he is old enough to make a choice. I wouldn't deny a man his choice one way or th…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 06:31 AM
2

upvote for burning down synagogues
/r/MensRights19/05/11 06:11 AM
4

I've always found that somewhat disgusting about this subreddit. It tends to be so extremist that people will downvote perfectly respectful person opinions about themselves.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 06:06 AM
3

You used to be able to, but fucking hippies voted that out too
/r/MensRights19/05/11 05:57 AM
-3

Circumcised here. Not scarred.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 05:51 AM
-5

Proudly circumcised. I agree with male rights and all, but this is friggin' stupid.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 05:44 AM
1

well, it also wasn't like he held her or wrestled her down to do it. He was just down in her area, or sitting near it, not sure. But she said she had smoked his weed, he said "you whore" and jabbed a finger in her. I have to take every offender's story with a grain of salt, but the reality is that most offenders who are guilty of doing something terrible immediately find a way to blame the victim. Those who take immediate responsibility are the ones are the ones I take an interest in, because th…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:00 PM
0

No one is excusing him. I'm just saying he got a raw deal. I could have named off a half a dozen other young dumb kids who have gotten themselves locked into charges of one sex crime or another. When I typed up my nice little hello speech to 2x it was just the example that popped into my mind. Believe me, there have been one or two occasions where I have simply wanted to pull my chair back from my desk and boot a motherfucker in the jaw. You think the concept of a child molester is aggravating? …
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:53 PM
1

What will happen in three years? He already showed immediate remorse, so there's no waiting for him to acknowledge it. What he did definitely wasn't earning of that much time. All three years in prison will do will abuse and hurt a kid like him, and that's exactly what it did.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:47 PM
1

He didn't rape anyone. And three years is WAY TOO FUCKING LONG. I have had guys who have gotten three years for sexual abuse of children.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:27 PM
2

because that's not all he got, and more. What he needed was probation and therapy. What he got was lifetime consequences.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:13 PM
2

I have met a lot of young men (and 1 or 2 ladies) who fell into the jailbait trap. I have also met men who rape children. I have to say I have seen the best and worst of both. People filled with guilt and embarrassment for large crimes, and people feeling the same for petty lower end stuff. I believe with time and therapy most can become active and sexually responsible citizens. And those who don't, well, we have the police and registries.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:55 PM
3

That is very much excessive. I'd speak to child protective services. (not a call in, make an appt and go down and speak to them)
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:34 PM
1

Thank you for the well thought out and civil response. Perhaps when I am prepared to try again I'll try one of those.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 03:00 PM
1

I dunno if a generalization like that is fair. Maybe feminists on reddit. 2x for sure. Not ever feminist is oblivious to this problem. Sorry, true feminists are a lot different than angry girls online. =)
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:54 PM
1

I definitely do not want an invasion type thing. I actually started off very politely explaining my views and thoughts and encouraged others to join in. I was met with nothing more than hostility and ignorance. I kind of figured 2x would be the polar opposite to MR, and give me some alternative viewpoints. All I got was a bad taste in my mouth.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:34 PM
-1

I meant that as humor, not seriously, sorry I stumbled over a sensitive subject!
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:32 PM
1

I weep for the future. For someone into "sociology" she sure takes every chance to drop the underhanded jab. Are sure you didn't read sociopathy?
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:16 PM
-1

I guess I could have left tat part out entirely, but then I felt the question was jolting and sudden sounding. I was hoping to illicit some replies, not shock folks off.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 02:15 PM
2

Wow, you actually went one dumber. Way to circumvent the argument entirely. You boggle my mind with confusion, because I am having trouble believing you exist. Either that or a very well trained troll. Either way you're not contributing, you're only trying to incite reaction. If you need attention look elsewhere. I can't handle any more of you. It's actually beginning to make my head ache.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 01:28 PM
3

That is by far, the most insulting and rude thing yet. Really? Is this what you're bringing to the table? "Coincidentally, so is the UN!" I am astounded that you have that much gall. You compare what this youg man did with what the UN actually protects innocent people from? Like, I don't know, the systematic raping of infants giving them aids, or the girls from Iran who were kept in a basement for 4 years and raped over and over? Do you really, and I do mean REALLY have no shame at all? You just…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 01:08 PM
3

Well I'm going to have to disagree with you. He was a good kid who did something dumb. He is not a "heinousness, nasty example of humanity." If 2x cannot handle the possibility of there being cases of injustice & varying degrees of sexual depravity, then obviously I was trying to appeal to a narrow minded crowd. That isn't feminism, and it's not progressive. It is ignorant and outdated thinking. No one seemed to be able to maintain a reasonable dialog. I opened with respect, and asked for opinio…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 12:15 PM
2

That wasn't exactly the most detailed example. I didn't realize how in depth it would get around that one example. I could have edited it or updated it but I felt it was going to fall on deaf ears. The young man in question was naked with his girlfriend. They were having sex. He asked her to light a marijuana joint they had been saving, but she informed him she had smoked it. He got angry and called her a whore and stuck his finger inside her. They got into an argument (not about the finger thin…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:42 AM
8

There was a great opportunity with this article to show that not everything regarding rape is so cut and dry, black & white. You destroyed it with the title. She wasn't a slut, she was a young & confused girl. The guy was a young & confused guy. Both were oblivious to what the other was thinking or feeling, nor did they know how to recognize or identify what was happening. Easily can be blamed on piss-poor sexual education. You had a great chance to bring up a lot of issues, an you shot it all t…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 12:02 AM
3

It's honestly the most respectable way of handling this. If this was a man talking about letting women die on the operating table because of their gender chances are that blog would be well good and gone.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 10:11 AM
7

I reported the blog to wordpress as call to violence. I encourage others to do so as well: http://en.wordpress.com/abuse/
/r/MensRights16/05/11 07:13 AM
1

After reading this I got the impression that this woman is just an all around horrible person. Nothing more, nothing less. Never seen such vile writings put together by a woman trying to be proactive.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 07:02 AM
1

I find it sad, but I have to agree with the judge on this one. Not as a mens rights issue, but as a common sense issue
/r/MensRights13/05/11 11:13 PM
7

Dr. Drew is a media whoring washout. Nothing that comes out of his mouth should ever be taken seriously. He's in the holy trinity of stupid doctors with Dr. Oz, and Dr. Phil.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 01:30 PM
-5

Actually, having the inability to not read whatever people send me I went ahead and read them. They were written on a blog run by a transgendered person, citations completely written by a lesbian woman who seems to do nothing but gender based apologetics on a different blog. (That sadly hasn't been updated in the last two years) As for "peer-review," I assume you mean peers being other gender idenity folks, because thats about all who have reviewed them. Except the overwhelming criticism this Dr…
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:42 AM
-3

I've already stated I'm done with you troll, and I'm not reading any citations where the url is fucking BLOGSPOT.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:04 AM
-4

I think /r/transphobiaproject has a new mascot. According to their logic, this is a girl.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 09:47 AM
1

Yeah, enjoy recess. It's going to be fun kid.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 09:44 AM
-2

Thank you! I try. Sorry the tranny downvote patrol got you =\
/r/MensRights10/05/11 11:51 PM
0

I've dated honest people for the most part.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 11:50 PM
1

True, but keep in mind countries where burqas are somewhat or entirely required women who don't wear them often times show up in the news as rape victims. It's not the rule of rape by any means, but can it be considered walking around in a bikini in these countries might come off as an invitation?
/r/MensRights10/05/11 11:47 PM
2

Honestly guys with small penises should be up front about it in this day and age.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 08:58 PM
2

See, this is the kind of debatable and respectable position I can enjoy and get involved with deeper. I don't have the time at the moment to research what you have stated, but I will be back later. Could you possibly provide some citations I can get into?
/r/MensRights10/05/11 08:53 PM
1

But you wouldn't buy a house in a high fire danger area if it was next to a field of dried grass either
/r/MensRights10/05/11 09:55 AM
1

Lol I couldn't help laughing at that, I was avoiding calling attention to it! But as for amorality, predatory men and women both tend to be amoral. Does that make sense?
/r/MensRights10/05/11 08:29 AM
1

Honestly in some situations yes. Sadly a lot of our fellow male population doesn't work with a full deck. People go on and on about crazy women here. There are just as many crazy men out there. And they create stereotypes for us, which is sad. Trust the wrong woman she'll destroy your life. Same can be said about men. And predatory men like that will often go after those they view to be easy targets.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 08:26 AM
6

I'd say getting bit by a shark is the sharks fault too, doesn't mean you go swimming wearing a wetsuit made of chum
/r/MensRights10/05/11 12:34 AM
1

I agree, I'd like to see some statistics on what women were wearing when they were raped. If there was a significant percent that were all slutted up when raped by a stranger it wouldn't be such an issue.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 11:37 PM
0

So what are your thoughts on these "slut parades" women are doing to protest the male officer who suggested that might lead to that?
/r/MensRights09/05/11 11:35 PM
1

I'd be down to bring a bit of traffic there. This place is becoming a bit too circlejerkish for my tastes
/r/MensRights09/05/11 10:06 PM
3

I stated this in a prior post, but I'll make a TL;DR for this one: Trans women still have all their male DNA. They still have male chromosomes. They do not have ovaries, uterus, or any female reproductive organs. Fully transgendered people do not have vaginas. They have mutilated penises that resemble vaginas. They do not contain a cervix, they do not secrete fluids. You are not women, you are modified men. If a white guy gets a full body tattoo of brown skin, it doesn't make him African America…
/r/MensRights09/05/11 06:12 PM
1

You can't rule out the fact that the school might not have done anything wrong either.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 05:43 PM
1

so without any evidence of this, you charged head on into getting all up in arms over a mommy playgroup? Really?
/r/MensRights09/05/11 09:45 AM
1

well there's that too
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:29 AM
1

citation?
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:28 AM
1

Who is not allowed?
/r/MensRights09/05/11 02:33 AM
1

oh shit hahaha you're right! I did link the wrong one >_<
/r/MensRights09/05/11 02:15 AM
0

Honestly this is one of those cases where I don't.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 02:03 AM
1

It was actually in reverse
/r/MensRights09/05/11 02:01 AM
3

I wish you the best of luck. If I was a rich man I'd fork over the cash for you. I know what it's like to be the kid in all of this, and it was not fun for me.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:47 AM
2

Could be any number of things. Did you fill out the application correctly? Did you leave anything blank. Was your handwriting neat? Do you have a criminal background? Did they have a Q&A section on the application? Before jumping on the MvsF train you might want to provide more details.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:43 AM
-2

the term feminazis is really offensive.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:40 AM
3

I need to play devils advocate here for a moment. "I can assure you that [the] decision to relieve Mr. Davis of his duties was not the result of a single incident," said Westwood schools superintendant John Antonucci in a statement, "but rather the regrettable outcome of an ongoing discussion."* That line alone, plus the added completely irate way the other gentleman went after him makes me inclined to think perhaps there was more to this story than this article has to offer. Is it possible this…
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:38 AM
11

seconded, this is a bit off sounding
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:33 AM
6

I'd be down for this.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:11 AM
3

Yeah, I'm a bit tired of the circlejerking too. It seems to be little more than a downvote patrol
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:05 AM
1

Well, those male groups need to not buckle. You read about all these lawsuits, but how many of them just buckled rather than face the lawsuit? now that I've asked that question I'm really curious. Anyone read a study on such a thing?
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:01 AM
1

So do people who play dungeons and dragons. Does that mean they have to let you play?
/r/MensRights08/05/11 11:08 PM
-1

Justification? Nah, you're right there. There is no real justification. But it is still very much a private run group, and they have the right to run it any way they like, even if it's silly.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 10:03 PM
-1

Well, I also live very close to SF and I can tell you one thing, if you have a family and can afford to live in SF, a 5% dip in anything doesn't matter all that much.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 10:02 PM
5

I want to drop a few nuggets into this argument because I have read so much of it, and I feel it's a great debate. Transgendered ladies: I will respect you. I will treat you with the same love and compassion I do everyone else. I have nothing against you. I will call you a she/her, I will refer to you by whatever name you choose, I will even tell yuo how beautiful you are. (If that's the case) I believe everyone should try to be whoever they are on the inside. With that out of the way, you need …
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:19 PM
0

Wow. That was so well executed I am blown away. Good job sir/miss.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 08:57 PM
1

And then the lord saidth: "Let there be win!" And it was so, and it was good.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 08:43 PM
-2

I enjoy debating a good violation of men's rights, but picking on every single organization who's aim is female interaction as a core seems petty and a waste of time. It's sad that they feel they can't be comfortable around men, and I find that silly, but it is still a private group & they have the right to run it any way they like. If this was a public group, run by let's say a school or a after school program I'd be a little more inclined to get upset.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 08:33 PM
0

Actually, yes! Perhaps some day we will all have a world full of understanding and acceptance where it's not even an issue. Perhaps even a world where transgender folks can actually become the gender they wish to be at a genetic and physical level. In fact I really hope that becomes a reality. However in this era, and with the limitations of current popular belief it's the correct thing to do to tell your partner.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 08:22 PM
3

Actually it very much could be. All your /sarcasm aside, a major majority of the world has extreme issues with homophobia still, and don't think of transexual women as women, but men in disguise. A man who has issues with that could be extremely scarred emotionally, and all your half assed sarcasm doesn't change that reality.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:32 AM
3

It's completely unacceptable to hide such a thing from someone. You could scar someone emotionally.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 04:24 AM
3

sexual battery for the most part is what this young man did.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 07:39 AM
1

I have been a volunteer for a sex crime non-profit for a few years now in California. Out in this state, and most states sexual battery means things like grabbing a lady on her breasts, ass, or crotch. With various subsections qualifying if it was over the clothing, etc. A slap on the ass in most states in most cases is sexual battery. Sexual ASSAULT is more along the lines of rape, forced oral sex, putting your fingers inside someone without their permission. It varies from state to state. In m…
/r/MensRights07/05/11 07:33 AM
1

That's Florida. Florida is one stones throw from using outhouses.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 07:15 AM
2

couldn't have said it better myself
/r/MensRights04/05/11 02:26 AM
1

It's none of your business.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 02:24 AM
7

Also fully aware she could die in a car wreck being chased by photo journalists.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 01:18 AM
10

Kevin Smith liked the star wars prequels. Just putting that out there before someone takes him seriously about anything.
/r/MensRights02/05/11 09:48 AM
1

You are completely correct
/r/MensRights25/04/11 08:12 AM
1

trying
/r/MensRights05/04/11 08:43 PM
1

Honestly none of that really phases me.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 04:44 AM
0

I agree about the parents for sure
/r/MensRights25/03/11 07:34 PM
-1

Really? How come?
/r/MensRights25/03/11 07:09 PM
2

Yeah, I read that, but as far as 1 in 4 is involved on school campuses, it doesn't clear up what the actual statistics are. I'm attempting to locate that information.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 11:20 PM
1

Why do you constantly spam this blog? All it is is a hate blog devoted to female sex offenders, while your reddit posts elsewhere are all porn links to milf smut. You seem a bit conflicted.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 04:17 AM
3

Before this runs down the route of should we or shouldn't we, I just wanted to bring up the fact that they're stating "castrate sex offenders" in a form where it's exclusive to men. Whereas a great deal of female creeps are caught all the time. =\ Also: no matter what a person does, I believe they have the right to be treated with at least the basic forms of human decency. And cutting their balls off? WTF is this, third world rules?
/r/MensRights28/01/11 11:08 AM
1

I was brought up to make my own decisions by whatever I prefered rather than what I should.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 03:44 AM
1

I apologize if my questions weren't clear. I attempted to put it together with a glass or two of wine in me. Basically these questions were more targeted towards women. It was more a question in he form of "Ask yourself this" which is why they came off more as statements. My apologies.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:41 AM
3

I have not, but he is dead now. He also sexually abused myself and my siblings. He's sharing a cell with Hitler in Hell. The last few years of his life were lonely and miserable as none of us would talk to him and his wife died. I got a small bit of satisfaction from that, but I like to look for the positive in things, and in this case it's the fact that he's dead and cannot bring any more suffering to the world. lol
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:38 AM
2

Sorry to short you a reply as long as yours, but very well said! I like when cultural norms are given attention, they are often ignored because "that's the way things are!"
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:34 AM
2

very provocative thoughts! I enjoyed reading them very much. I don't really have much of a reply, I just wanted to let you know I appreciate the input.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:32 AM
6

Well, she was kind of nerdy. Librarian bookworm type. But also very much against Vietnam, women's lib, and other topics of interest at that time. She also grew up in a small farm town, but the politics of the day were a concern to everyone. My grandfather was more the American loving WWII veteran. So she often didn't have much of an option to really get out there and date. Not all people who are homosexual realize they are. And some times it can take years to come to terms with it once they real…
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:30 AM
6

She didn't figure out she was gay until a few years after she left my father. He was very physically abusive, and she packed me up in a car when I was 10 and hid me after an episode of him beating me to the point of not being able to walk. She got more the mental abuse. He would often threaten her that he'd kill me if she ever left, etc. But he did hit her quite a bit too.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:22 AM
7

Isn't that a bit biased? Not all hippies were LSD induced orgy-hounds.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:20 AM
4

Oh, and my father's abuse included burning down a house, I'm unsure if his anger was exactly fits the mold of being modified by external stimuli. Short version: he was a dick.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:09 AM
4

Or she could have been a confused farm girl raised baptist with no clue what homosexuality was.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter