TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UnknownReasonings Archive

View 1 post and 117 comments by UnknownReasonings on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
153

ProgressUnknownReasonings/r/MensRights21/01/25 06:15 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thank you for telling me about that. I didn’t know about feminism’s role in that. I’ll have to read up on it.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 03:42 AM
0

That’s a good point. I suppose there is a strong argument that some spin-off movement, RadFem for example, could have a core tenet of focusing solely on women or even denigrating men. I think we would want to be sure we were being specific when we say that though because otherwise we’re using the same “all men” tactics I tink we all agree are wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 09:48 PM
–

This is a perfect example!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 07:56 PM
1

I know many feminists. I also meet tons of bigots. The two groups have nothing to do with one another.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 07:39 PM
4

This is exactly how I feel too. We have to stamp down on hate speech because it tricks people into being comfortable with hate. Why not discriminate against the "dangerous and harmful" man that applied for a role when the "safe and strong" women could be hired instead. The reverse sexism happens too and is as equally harmful: Hiring a woman is a risk because "they love to make up allegations and sue". We're all just people trying to get by. We've just allowed far too much room for the misogynist…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 05:12 PM
4

I think the person you're replying to is saying that misandry is GENERALLY more socially allowed than misandry. That's why we see anti-misogyny laws being written in the UK rather than anti-misogyny and anti-misandry laws. I agree with the person you replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 05:06 PM
0

I've accused you of lying, if you have anything that shows feminism is based on women's issues solely it will be incredibly easy for you to prove me wrong. More repeated slogans isn't going to do it.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:57 PM
-2

Feminism is built upon the goal of equality. Anyone that argues for less equality, or in many current-day cases an anti-man sentiment, is not feminist. No amount of you repeating divisive bumper sticker slogans will change that. You're allowed to hate feminism as much as you want but you aren't going to lie your way into shutting me up.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:51 PM
-5

Yes, many bigoted non-feminists have existed since formation of the belief system. They are not the norm nor do their beliefs fit within feminism. The movement itself has simple goals that help everyone that is discriminated against. We shouldn’t reject that admirable and beneficial goal because some bad apples snuck into the feminism camp.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:15 PM
-7

Exactly! Misandrists wedged their way into feminist spaces and anti-feminists use that as ammo to hate feminism while disregarding the majority of feminists that want exactly what we all do. At the end of the day I understand the logic they use but it’s a self-serving belief these anti-fems have. We will all be less equipped to argue for equality if we keep making this an us vs them thing.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:13 PM
-16

No, that's an interpretation but not feminism. If someone is being anti-men, they are not being feminist. This isn't debatable. The fact that we allow non-feminists to claim they are is the problem, not feminism itself.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 02:49 PM
-19

I get why you feel this way but no, Feminism is not about hatred of men. I'll be honest though, it's hard lately to not associate the two. I think that's the goal of the misandrists. Don't let misandrists claim to be feminists, explain to them that their hatred of men excludes them from feminism by definition.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 01:59 PM
3

This is just the next theme for the gender wars. Keep track of what politicians, companies, and media companies do what and then politically or monetarily punish the ones that try to spread hate. It’s the same song and dance, but at least it seems like more people are speaking out. That means something is working, I hope.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/25 12:45 AM
1

I will be sure to tell them all that nothing that you said in your comment made any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:01 PM
5

None of this makes any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:43 PM
12

It's a theory but it's going to be impossible to prove. Plus, in my experience there are enough crazies from each demo that neither need any help from the other side to be horrible.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/04/25 03:38 PM
16

Notice everyone how Illustrious_Tea5271 doesn't care about protecting anyone, they simply want to be sure anyone that shares demographics with the type of criminals they want to focus on are punished. Bigots, in this case a misandrist, are horrible people that should be harmed anyway possible, within the limits of the rules of Reddit, of course.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 06:20 PM
9

Why are so many great conversations had here but this level of argument isn't taken outside of this sub? The reason we see so much misandry is because we are too afraid to talk about it the way we would any other important topic. Stop being afraid to ruffle feathers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 06:08 PM
–

My wife is my bar for an ideal woman, though a woman can be "high value" without being like my wife. Things that set her apart from most people I would date: She brings me much more emotional peace than anxiety; was able to live a full life as a single person, the same way I was; has her own friends; has her own libido; sets clear and firm boundaries with not only the world but also with me; she acknowledges the ways I better her life often and publicly; and she is willing to protect and honor o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 09:08 PM
–

TermAggravating8043 is just going to "nuh uh" anything you say; they can't actually backup their beliefs. Watch their behavior and report anything they do that is against the rules; such as their low-effort replies here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:35 PM
–

I wish people like you wouldn’t have chased so many away from the left. We may have won if Kamala would have shut down the bigots. Now we all get to suffer because you can’t get over whatever makes you hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 11:33 PM
–

For you, the guys has to also be a misandrist, so you can harm him without him standing up for himself. I don't think anyone should take seriously the thoughts of someone that is a bigot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 10:20 PM
0

Trying to change the topic from you hating men to me voting for Jill Stein; ok. Now, back to you being a bigot. What happened to you to make you have boys and men so much?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 09:55 PM
1

Haha! You are such a bad troll. Are you pausing your misandry and switching to full on idiocy next?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 09:41 PM
2

Nah, you desire to generalize people based on their demographics because you, like most bigots, care only about someone's identity. Men and women are great, bigots are the enemy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 09:12 PM
1

You’re right, I mistook what you said before as saying the opposite. Thanks for helping me understand!
/r/MensRights18/02/25 10:05 PM
0

Those statements about Kamala were bigoted and wrong. Before we dig into any examples, are you comfortable giving the same clear denouncement of any misandry we expose?
/r/MensRights18/02/25 09:51 PM
27

Keep fighting but try to remember women aren’t the ones saying misandristic things, bigots are. Make your arguments anti-bigot and it makes them very hard to argue against.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 09:49 PM
6

Argue with people that post things that are bigoted. You may not change the mind of the bigot but if you argue your points well you may change the mind of someone that reads what you say. You’re owed the same protection from society as anyone else. Anyone that tried to deny you of that should be treated the same way as you would anyone that tried to deny you your rights.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 09:48 PM
13

Great point! The emotional harm and social disconnect caused when people say that misogyny kills and misandry hurts men’s feelings, is the goal. They want to make online spaces, Reddit most-so, uncomfortable for men. That’s why the content rules name and exemplify the groups they do(and exclude the group it does). Edit: so many spelling errors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 07:32 PM
32

This is misandry; not enough of us call it outs so it keeps going. We’re far too invested in internet points and not invested enough in standing up for ourselves and the other men that can’t do it for themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 05:30 PM
2

Yeah, you’re right. Howard Zinn does a great job of explaining this in his books.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 06:59 PM
1

Yeah, like the 18 year old high school graduate that isn’t going to college didn’t do anyone any harm just by existing. He needs to be given the same opportunity as everyone else; not denied it because he looks like people that did bad before.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 06:21 PM
6

I won’t vote Dem again until they fix the level of hatred they allow to spread within the ranks. I’m done voting for policies that are against my best interest while at the same time being shamed and excluded because of my demographics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 02:33 PM
-13

Again, nothing here has anything to do with men’s rights. Do you always say so much to do so little?
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:25 PM
-17

Great, now go dismantle then. I’d say though that this will instead end up with a few dozen people focused on whether or not women are somehow a problem, which serves no point.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:19 PM
-22

What about this has anything to do with men’s rights? This sub is getting pretty whiney and unfocused.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:10 PM
1

The things you’re saying make no sense and you’re the one making them up. Are the actions subconscious or decisions made purposely to increase safety; you claim both but they are mutually exclusive. https://www.reddit.com/user/KayRay1994/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 08:26 PM
1

Oops, it looks like I can’t share the link to your comment. Reread your latest comment above mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 08:19 PM
1

So much of this is make believe it’s hard to know if any of it is worth responding to. Can you make a clear point that explains why you believe individual men deserve social pressure because of the actions of other men they don’t know?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 08:11 PM
0

I've had the same thing happen. It used to be a much worse-moderated sub, now it's fairly benign. It's really hard to shake the feeling that the misandry wants to bubble up but I worry that's my own hyper-vigilance rearing it's ugly head.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:36 PM
2

I recommend you not view feminists as enemies, because they’re not. There are many that are fighting for the same equality we are. Make enemies of those that fight against you and rally those that agree.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 02:42 PM
-2

You're a very good boy!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 07:25 PM
4

Sad that you don’t have an actual argument against my nuh uh. You are out of make believe to try to dump on us? Maybe you had a chance to reflect on your bigotry, though based on your history I’d say it’s not that. I promise, life gets better if you stop being a horrible person.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:42 PM
3

What retort is there to an opinion that’s so obviously untrue and based on nothing but prejudice? Nuh uh, may suffice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:27 PM
7

Post where you want. If you get banned call out the sub here so we can all be sure to behave accordingly. Don’t let fake internet points or access to echo chambers convince you that standing up for yourself isn’t allowed.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 05:15 PM
13

One core difference exists though, so it’s not an apples to apples comparison: being part of a religion, and being associated with it, is a choice. Your callout it a great reminder that it’s very easy to generalize and end up doing the thing we want bigots to stop doing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/25 02:12 PM
3

I don’t necessarily want to argue. Do you honestly want to understand misandry? Happy cake day.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/25 03:42 AM
1

I like this. I’ll be focusing on growing the tent. We’re going to have a lot of potential new allies over the next few weeks because of fractures forming. Even the last 2 days I’ve seen a big increase in followers here and on Twitter it’s been insane.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 11:58 PM
7

People forget; we aren't debating to convince the person that disagrees with us. We debate to show people that are in the middle that the misandrists exist, are unknowledgeable, and ill-equipped to have even a first-level conversation. This list of questions is so obviously in bad-faith that it serves our purpose without any engagement, so why would anyone try to argue against that?
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/25 06:27 PM
1

I’m missing your actual point. What is your action plan if not to build a coalition to vote in policy?
/r/MensRights23/01/25 03:32 AM
0

Cool. What do we gain by pushing away people that agree with us? We gain nothing from being assholes.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 02:29 AM
-1

Those aren’t Feminist arguments, they’re the arguments of non-feminists. Feminism is at its core an ideology that aims for equality. Anyone saying anything that isn’t aimed at equality isn’t a Feminist and we should all be comfortable saying that. For an analogy let’s think of a house. A house requires at least as many walls, floors, and roofs as necessary to enclose a physical space. If a single side to our enclosure is missing, it’s not a house, no matter how many people (or the fake-house its…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 07:43 PM
0

Which part of the article upset you? What of this person’s words didn’t make sense? I really hope you have answers because you wouldn’t want bigotry to be the reason you don’t like it, right?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 02:40 PM
3

You know, when our sub has a hundredth of the membership that some of those that hate us do, I’ll consider turning away allies. Until then I’m going to be worrying more about what someone has to say. I suggest you do the same.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:03 AM
1

Yeah, I believe that at the end of the day hate speech is hate speech and shouldn’t be tolerated. Since Reddit, and most institutions, don’t care about protecting men from misandry it’s on us to be aggressive about doing it ourselves: Make a lot of noise shouting down bigots, call out misandry by name while tagging the person that said it(so when they delete their comment you’ll still know who to focus on), and make this whole site less comfortable for people that hate us.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:29 PM
1

I know what you mean. It’s really hard to trust that people could actually be writing something supportive when all we’re used to is being shamed. That’s one of the reasons this stood out to me. It is one of the very rare news articles Google returns when you search for “misandry” that isn’t denying it even exists.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:19 PM
1

Not really, it’s literally in the text. I don’t mean to be pointed at you but let’s not misconstrue what it says. Edit with text: “ It’s hard for me to tell how “radical” this opinion even is anymore. I have known a lot of people (especially trans people) who think that “men are the oppressors” is fundamental to all feminism rather than a specific strain of radicalism that conflicts with later theories of intersectionality. So like, who knows what the fuck “feminism” means to any given person an…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:14 PM
0

I think what the author is saying is that Feminism is accepting of him, individuals that claim to be Feminists don’t. He goes on to talk about how it used to be radical feminists that would claim men were the cause of all of women’s issues but now it may be Feminism as a whole, since that is where the movement has gone.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:09 PM
5

Yeah, her book and the expose done about her work did a lot of good but they've been disregarded because they don't tell the story most people want to hear. This article speaks in a similar tone, which is why I thought it was valuable enough to share here.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 07:54 PM
3

Yep, keep going. It's gets into a lot of depth about the way misandry is used to try to shunt our speech and arguments. Very good read for people that fight against misandry in online spaces like Reddit.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 07:33 PM
22

I agree; some people hate men so much they’ll never listen to us. If it takes a cohort of all types of people to shine light on misandry, it’s still better than the alternative.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 07:04 PM
17

I’m glad to see folks in the comments calling out the misandry. I wish it were louder and more ferocious though. Men are shit on because we don’t make enough noise when it happens. Anyone saying bigoted things should be inundated with people correcting their mistaken beliefs.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 11:46 PM
1

As long as u/spez leads Reddit there will be allowed misandry. I really with Reddit’s board meetings were publicly shared so we could all go show Spez how strongly we feel about the hate that the policies that are in place are causing.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 08:56 PM
17

Like you said; Feminism is diverse. There are people that identify as feminists that hate men and celebrate any harm caused to men. There are plenty of others that fight against that bigotry. People that exhibit bigotry should be called out and shamed as much as possible.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 05:51 PM
2

The study doesn’t go into that, so we really can’t say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 12:17 PM
7

Great question! Those rates (female students: 76.3% and 70.6%(we'll call cohort A)) and (female students: 77.2% and 72.1% (cohort B)) are the likelihood of respondents to report asking for verbal consent before engaging in sex, Cohort A represents female respondents that have EVER had sex. Cohort B represent females that are CURRENTLY having sex (within 3 months in this study).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 07:49 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:41 PM
5

I was into this until I read how many thoughts you weren’t going to allow to be discussed. Just list all the opinions you demand your members have here so they don’t learn it by getting banned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 10:39 PM
1

Only the bar owners have the ability to have discounts for different demographics. How do you foresee men practicing this equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 10:49 PM
1

So are you and now so am I.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 08:52 PM
3

This is it exactly. We have policies in place right now that have discrimination based on protected class, written into them. The fact that the left is the ones doing it doesn't make it ok in my book. We all deserve the same legal protections from the society we live in. I can't vote for a party that disagrees, no matter how much I support their other ideals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/24 05:49 PM
31

I’m going to reply to your headline and not all the rhetoric you spout in the body of your post. Be on the looking for money-chasing behavior. If it seems like the women you’re dating is using you for any type of value-add; stop seeing her immediately. You’re not a potential partner, you’re a potential income. Avoid junk-repliers. If you ask a question and they answer without asking a follow up or offering depth in their reply, call it out or just stop replying. Someone that invests practically …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 06:34 PM
-2

The OP posed this; that's what they're doing. What are you doing to support those that call out the differences in the way people are treated? What would motivate someone to want to argue against it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 05:31 PM
-4

No they aren't. Are al of your comments lies or is this one unique?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 05:30 PM
18

You and she are both not only wrong but also both very comfortable generalizing people based on their race. We will end the conversation here; that behavior is unacceptable. Have a great day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 12:25 AM
19

We can agree to disagree. To me someone hitting the mark when they speak about one thing doesn’t give them the authority to, or mitigate the damage when, they generalize a people in a harmful way. What is the upside to her inaccurate language?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 12:22 AM
23

She is equipped with the same, or better, vocabulary than most of us. If she doesn’t delineate between a race and those within in that exhibit unwanted behavior, it is by choice and by design. Racist and sexist woman that hasn’t been called out nearly enough. Edit: typo
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 12:16 AM
16

“…And more often than not sex simply does not deliver the goods. This fact does not lead men to cease obsessing about sex; it intensifies their lust and their longing.” This speaks to an inherent state of being; an obsession for sex. You may have a different interpretation but nothing in this at all supports your reasoning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 12:14 AM
20

What shorthand are you comfortable people using when generalizing your race? I’m very uncomfortable with anyone doing it, so why would I leave space for it to happen here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 12:11 AM
31

This is a good one for sexism. Men are emotionless sex-seekers: “Men come to sex hoping that it will provide them with all of the emotional satisfaction that would have come from love. Most men think that sex will provide them with a sense of being alive, connected, that sex will offer closeness, intimacy, pleasure. And more often than not sex simply does not deliver the goods. This fact does not lead men to cease obsessing about sex; it intensifies their lust and their longing.” This one exempl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/24 11:53 PM
34

Gloria Jean Watkins (bell hooks) is a horrible racist and sexist. I wouldn't build any type of foundational concepts on her or her work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/24 08:23 PM
21

Very nice compilation, thank you!
/r/MensRights09/12/24 08:09 PM
10

This is fascinating. I wish there were more data I could see though. Do you know if they've shared the numbers behind these grphics?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 09:20 PM
1

I'm going to ask you two questions that I hope you take the time to look into: Who controls what candidates' names are printed on the ballots? Who appoints those that control what candidates' names are printed on the ballots?
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:19 PM
1

You were asked to clarify your post, didn't, but then chose to reply about a comment. You clearly don't want to have a discussion, just throw out little slogans.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 07:23 PM
2

Ok, done. What part of that applied to the comment you replied to?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:46 PM
2

What part of this wiki do you mean to reference? Is there a reason you don't cite anything specific?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:42 PM
0

I can't speak to the UKs statistics, only the US. In the US it is true; here is the peer-reviewed data: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 06:16 PM
1

Men are more violent, unless you're talking about in-relationship. In intimate partner relationships women initiate 70% of violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 05:15 PM
1

Surveys are hard data. They are how we get most of our understanding in any of the humanity subjects. Men under-report IPV and police detain and arrest men by default in domestic situations. These combine to make crime reports a secondary measure, not the primary, when talking about IPV.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 03:25 PM
0

We know that more women begin physical altercations than their men partners do but when men retaliate the women are most likely to be hurt. People should not hit one another, regardless of their sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 01:51 AM
1

Can you think of a reason that the crime statistics report higher male-violence when the self-reported data shows women initiate 70% of IPV?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 07:01 PM
1

Why is it when people cite a statistic like u/Hjelmert did with "and like 50% of their abusers were male"; they always seem to be incorrect. It's almost like groups of people go out of their way to lie to make these conversations more difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 04:50 PM
4

u/Hjelmert is making up statistics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 04:48 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 04:44 PM
2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 04:43 PM
3

Can you share anything that led to your beliefs here? They don't seem to match reality. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 04:31 PM
-1

I cannot disagree with statements like this loudly enough. Feminists are not our enemies; Misandrists are our enemies. Many Feminists really are aiming for equal rights. The fact that they are no more successful at expelling the hate in their movement than we are in ours, isn't excuse enough for me to throw away the valuable relationships I have with them.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:28 PM
6

You're banking on these misandrists arguing with you in good faith. They don't and won't do that. These people are misandrist and I think that's how they they need to be labeled.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:07 PM
1

I understand what you're saying but this is a needless change that will serve no goal, unless you have some insight the rest of us don't see.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 06:32 PM
3

Sorry, I’m having a really hard time following you.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:19 AM
3

What isn’t? Very few people have actual authentic over you, if you’re an adult. It definitely feels like more though. I don’t know what this means.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 10:49 PM
33

Using social pressure to make people behave ways they don't want to via emotions, exclusion, or dehumanization, is an example of toxic femininity. Name it, call it out, and shame the individuals you see using these tactics; they aren't going to stop but you can show that their tactics won't work on you. They hate that.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 09:41 PM
–

The man v bear debate is the same as the "Your body...my choice" rhetoric. Both are designed to be snarky and inflammatory slogans with no actual point. If you want to argue with people and be emotionally jerked off by a bunch of trolls; go to town. You aren't going to have any effect on policy or the larger political conversation though. Early-Possibility367 is one of those that prefer ineffectual jerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 08:12 PM
3

You wrote a lot but it’s well thought out. I’m glad that you have such resilience. I’d ask that you keep in mind that many other men don’t have the same level of mental fortitude. I’ll be speaking out when I hear general attacks against “white men”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 11:16 PM
7

Really solid breakdown; thank you for writing this up!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 10:03 PM
1

Excluding men from protective policies, grants, and government funding have been the most damaging misandric things they've done. They're pretty good about not using openly hateful language; it really depends on where we set the bar. Is there a misogynistic quote you think we can use as the baseline, to find misandric quotes?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:10 PM
6

You're very bad at debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:52 PM
2

This is a great point and is completely true. Those comments are gross and crass. They don't however usually generalize women, they more try to illicit responses from the individual woman posting. This is a great example of individual vs systemic issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:43 PM
3

Yes to all of this! We also need to sue anytime there are damages caused by sex-based discrimination. When the bottom line starts to fall, that's when people that write policy take note.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:56 PM
0

Women are also supposed to have power. Anyone stating that they aren't is wrong and will be ineffective.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:54 PM
4

We aren't trying to convince misandrists, we are going to pressure governments and companies to enforce their protections across the board, not just for women. Sex-neutral laws and policies that cover everyone are my goal.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:54 PM
2

Can we just admit the truth that women and money is like oil and water? They don't mix. It's almost as if God put a curse on women lol. No, u/Islanderwithwings; we will not "admit" that women and money do not mix. Your view is ridiculous; generalizing language shows bigotry and has no place.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 03:43 PM
2

Great, thank you, your effort and acknowledgement helps all of us. Hopefully more and more Feminists start to practice this version of equal support. Excluding the hateful/misguided people from the Feminist and MRA communities will show how most of our goals support one another.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:24 PM
8

It's good your version of Feminism aims to advocate for everyone. Can you tell us which issues the men's rights movement fights for that you, and the other Feminists you align with, are most supportive of?
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:25 PM
1

https://youtu.be/4lNnGkEQ8KY?si=hlNi8t-lTrZZj6_y Begins at the 0:39 mark.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 03:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter