| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maths Teacher Convicted Of Assault For Squirting Ex-Girlfriend With Water PistolIn my opinion, and the law, the four examples are the same. They all interfere with the body of the victim. [Here] (http://law.justia.com/cases/texas/supreme-court/1967/b-342-0.html) is a case commonly taught in first year tort classes which addresses the plate example. What I gather from your comment is that you and I view body integrity differently. Great minds can differ. The case has good language, and I hope it can demonstrate the rationale of the law. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/15 11:36 PM |
| – | Maths Teacher Convicted Of Assault For Squirting Ex-Girlfriend With Water PistolI'm more than happy to have a civil discussion. Your question involves a "should" which is not a legal question, but a question of personal opinion. I personally think this current definition and application is good for society. I believe your rights end where mine begin. Under the current law, you do not have the right to offend my body. You do not have the right to punch me, spit on me, hit a plate out of my hand, or squirt water at me. I wouldn't call the law "draconian" as most people would … | /r/MensRights | 08/11/15 09:51 PM |
| – | Maths Teacher Convicted Of Assault For Squirting Ex-Girlfriend With Water PistolAmerican attorney here. In my jurisdiction, this is clearly criminal. In criminal law, the terms "assault" and "battery" tend to be used interchangeably even though they are different. An assault is a threat that is more than words, while a battery is the act itself. My jurisdiction's definition of battery, which is a common legal definition, includes "harm or offense." As such, spitting on a person constitutes a battery in my jurisdiction. This case falls under the same logic. The squirting of … | /r/MensRights | 08/11/15 04:14 PM |
| 6 | What women really want – money: Research finds women look for well-paid job first in partnerThis phenomenon has been documented and converted into an easy to understand graph. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/15 03:24 PM |
| 3 | No, I will not trade you for time with our child.First, I would accept her "offer." When you look back on it, you won't see building the bed as his mother getting her way, you'll remember the time spent with your son. Speaking as someone who had two father figures who weren't around, any time you spend with him will mean the world. Second, find the law in your jurisdiction on recording conversations. If all parties are required to be notified, you must make it clear she knows. If you accept her "offer," she is likely to make similar "offers" i… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/15 01:38 AM |
| – | I started a change.org petition to change the current wording of English Law to include the many male victims it forgets. I thought this sub might be interestedThe phrase "penile penetration" would provide for an under-inclusive definition of "rape." Women do rape other women. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/15 09:48 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter