TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Unoriginalityception Archive

View 1 post and 36 comments by Unoriginalityception on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Good point. I've read read many cases on reddit alone of men who refused to file for custody either because they felt it would affect their children to separate them from their mothers or because they were threatened by their wives with accusations of abuse during court hearings so they decided to drop any custody claim altogether. Huh, and they call men selfish...
/r/MensRights19/09/25 11:24 PM
1

You may have misinterpreted my comment. Why are you saying I'm lying? I'm not claiming courts aren't biased against men; quite the opposite. I was replying to the guy who said that the dads must be exceptionally good to gain custody, to which I merely pointed out that, no matter how good the father is, the mother typically gets custody of the kids unless she's really, really too fucked up to leave the kids with her. He can be the best dad in the world or an average man; if the mom meets the basi…
/r/MensRights19/09/25 11:21 PM
16

Nah, not really. If my understanding is correct, courts give custody based on whether or not the mothers are fit to raise the child, not by comparing the mother to the father, so men getting custody has less to do with them and more to do with the mothers. The dad could be an average joe and still get custody if the mom is a drug addict with multiple arrest warrants.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 08:34 PM
1

What's the deal with China?
/r/MensRights13/09/25 12:33 PM
5

Thanks for pointing this out! I was thinking the same thing reading her post. Maybe her intentions are good now, but it's only because her actions have harmed someone she cares about. She would still continue to create harmful content, treating men the same way as she used to if her actions hadn't brought her brother to the point of wanting to be dead. Only the fact that her own brother caught friendly fire got her to think whether her content was really more than just part of a self-absorbed vi…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 09:12 PM
26

B-b-but 25x is much higher than 3x, so clearly that means it's women who deserve all the compassion so we need to disregard men altogether! /s
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:50 AM
10

Agreed, but I think what bothers men isn't mostly the lack of attraction based on things that can hardly be changed if at all. I mean it still sucks, especially when you were taught a different story about how attraction works, but it is what it is. One just gotta live with it. What makes it worse is the gaslighting and the way it's made out to be men's fault e.g. his unattractivenes is deflected to his personality or something he must've done because women can't possibly be that shallow to reje…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 11:32 AM
4

No, they're not different, especially now given how many people are online nowadays. Maybe if it were some niche community you might have a case, but today, not really. Taller men being liked based on their height alone compared to shorter men has been known since ancient times, well before the internet was a thing. Plus, people are more comfortable about going online to express opinions and preferences they would avoid voicing in real life for fear of repercussions. Ladies in the past may have …
/r/MensRights10/09/25 11:07 AM
11

Nah, not really. The difference is that feminism is an ideology one can choose to agree or disagree with. One is not born a feminist, so both men and women can be feminists and therefore both can be toxic feminists. Masculinity describes a pattern of behaviors and traits that are specific to men as a gender, so you cannot really accuse a woman of toxic masculinity without appearing absurd. Yes, some men can be toxic, but that doesn't make masculinity in itself toxic. The problem is that feminist…
/r/MensRights06/09/25 12:02 PM
2

Agreed + good point about men being viewed as human doings. It definitely plays a role in these dynamics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 08:06 PM
16

To add to your comments on sex workers, there's another reason why it's maligned that has less to do with gender roles: it simply makes sex more accessible to men and lessens women's leverage. Men typically want sex more than women and on average have higher sex drives. Men's sex drives are also more or less constant while women's sex drive tends to fluctuate, the sex the average man gets from the average woman is more satisfying to him than it is for her, the average woman is more attractive to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 07:24 PM
12

Well, how are people supposed to escape responsibility for their actions if you don't continue to blindly trust them even after they abused your trust? /s Kudos to your buddy. I hope he makes the right call, no matter how hard it may be or how much resistance he may face.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 05:58 PM
7

As mentioned in the OP, it was mostly a mind dump lol with the explicit disclaimer that I'm not claiming I'm offering some unique, eartshattering perspective. I did include this aspect in the TL;DR part and I did indicate on a few occasions throughout the text that this is my interpretation of what the research I cited suggests. The conclusion actually starts with the caveat that my takeaway could just be me pulling at straws. The post I referenced in my OP got me thinking about why even today m…
/r/MensRights27/08/25 07:09 AM
5

Bingo. You're very right on the money and I fully agree with you. Case in point: height. We're all taller than our ancestors were overall and a man of average height today would've been well above average 1000 years ago, but the bar has moved up accordingly. Same for intelligence, nutrition, self-care, life expectancy etc. The whole point of the post is that the vast majority of men (perhaps 80% or even more) are simply unattractive to women, hence they can't turn women on (or can do so only thr…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 10:16 PM
1

Haha, totally! A lot has changed over the past couple of decades when it comes to expectations during sex, and I fully resonate with your final paragraph. While women have (quite rightly, to my mind) become more and more assertive about what they want in bed, men's expectations have (very wrongly) been consistently portrayed as exploitative and self-centered to the point where they are expected to be content with what they get. Also, this part: You will get your face covered in her juices. And p…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 08:45 PM
3

Thank you for your feedback and for writing the original post! I think the message you conveyed is very valuable and something that a lot of men both young and older need to hear. As men, we have a very natural, human need for intimacy and to be desired. It's simply human, just like women want intimacy and to feel desired. It just so happens that, because most men are unattractive to most women, sex won't be as pleasurable to women as it is to men. It's neither men's nor women's fault. I view it…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 08:29 PM
7

Yup, pretty much this.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 06:59 PM
3

Oh, that's exactly the kind of love that most men would crave - to be desired the way you are, and if you add in the effort to be even better, then kudos. You already pointed out the key element in all this, though: women who already love their guys, or find them a bit attractive without the effort The key here is the existence of genuine attraction. My post isn't referring to affection - which is indeed dependent upon things such as kindness, intelligence, humor, honesty and so on and which can…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 06:57 PM
4

Hey man, thanks for your comment! I appreciate it and I definitely share your opinion that men should groom themselves more as a matter of self-care, not necessarily with the goal of impressing women, but to just for the satisfaction of fulfilling their potential and being the best version of themselves. In fact, I think it's highly damaging that men are taught since childhood that they should derive their value from how women feel about them as opposed to being inherently valuable themselves. A…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 05:33 PM
5

Jesus, man....just reading that made my skin crawl in a way it hadn't for a very long time. It's all sorts of fucked up rolled into one. The part that really gave me chills is when she describes her "plan". It shows that she did everything she done not so much out of unchecked emotions but in a very rational and aware state of mind. She is very aware about what she was doing, about "breaking his state of mind", disguising her need to control your dad through psychological abuse and dominance as …
/r/MensRights25/08/25 09:41 AM
2

It doesn't really hurt them because, if they're deemed weak, then that means they can do no harm and are innocent, hence they are absolved from any and all forms of accountability, like when they can hit men at their leisure with no consequences. Perpetual victimhood also enables them to call for measures to "level the playing field in the name of equality or historical reparations" (a.k.a. privileges to skew the playing field in their favor) and to call upon historical injustices as means of ex…
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:49 PM
6

This is so, so spot-on. I think this is the first time I've ever seen anyone list their arguing tactics in such an accurate and neat compilation. Kudos for this! It shows so much about their dishonesty.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:37 PM
2

Too far, my friend. We've fallen too far, and I fear there's room yet to fall even further still.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:36 PM
2

From what I can tell, they pretty much are justifying racism, but only towards a certain race whose members institutionalized racism in the past when they held all the power on all levels of society and used it to oppress other races. It doesn't matter that equal rights have long since been granted and that today's members of that race aren't racists or even defending racism today. Advocates of the social justice POV view those people as collectively guilty for the actions of people from the pas…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 10:00 PM
11

Yeah, but this is the good ole 'punching up' and 'harmlessly poking' the 'fragile male ego' and that if he were a real man who was secure in his masculinity, he would've just laughed it off, because self-respect for men obviously means letting everyone shit on you to their heart's content and not taking it seriously. Of course, it doesn't work the other way around. Her ego is a delicate thing of beauty that society must protect at absolutely all costs lest her coochie gets sad and pouty. /s By t…
/r/MensRights17/08/25 01:29 PM
11

I always like when they always appeal to hIsTorIcAl rEaSoNs in order to support their point. It's almost always a dead giveaway that they have no logical argument. It's like a disingenuous way of saying "yeah, my argument is worthless given expectations of accountability within the current social dynamics, bu-bu-but someone of his gender did this thing to someone of her gender many decades ago and got away with it because society allowed it, so she is well entitled to do the same thing today wit…
/r/MensRights17/08/25 01:22 PM
3

Fair points indeed, and I get where you're coming from. I remember when Karen Straughan aka girlwriteswhat used to put out content on these issues. She and others like her stood up for men despite having nothing to gain and a lot to lose. They truly deserve respect and recognition.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 08:25 PM
1

You make some very valid points. You're on point about not descending to the same rhetoric feminists use since it'll almost certainly be used against men as proof that men are toxic and that any movement arguing for their rights is misogynistic. Also, the issue of female victims of female abuse being glossed over is very spot on as to how feminism can harm women too, though I can't help but imagine feminists framing this issue as men's fault too (or at best they'd argue it's just a bunch of rare…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 06:32 PM
7

Men 'whine on the internet' because it's the only place where they can draw attention to their issues. Offline, they'd be at best ignored and at worst ridiculed for doing so. The very reason why those men you help (massive kudos for that btw) need your help so much is precisely because the odds are so steeply stacked against them due to feminists who fight tooth and nail to keep the discourse centered on women's perpetual victimhood, hence any acknowledgement that men also face issues is seen as…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 12:09 PM
1

Okay, that makes a lot more sense and seems far more reasonable. Thank you for this clarification. I thought your original comment was making a completely different point and I replied based on that interpretation. Hope you have a good day!
/r/MensRights12/07/25 12:42 PM
4

"Y'all can "impregnate" women cause women have the system 💀 we can use multiple guy's seeds to get pregnant although it would be slow since we are creating kids not you and there are even chances to get pregnant by two men." Yes, and the point is that you can get pregnant only because there are men able and willing to give you the seed that gets you pregnant. Nothing you said contradicts what I said. For reproductive purposes, men's seed would be worthless without women to impregnate just as wom…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 09:31 AM
4

And if all men die out, what are you gonna do in case of a massive power outage and all the sperm in the sperm banks is spoiled? What are you gonna do if the sperm in the sperm bank run out and, by some improbable set of circumstances, there's no way to replenish it? I dunno, say all the born babies are either female or, if there are males born, they're something wrong with their sperm and there's too great a risk for congenital defects or something; I'll leave it up to your imagination. Even if…
/r/MensRights11/07/25 11:52 AM
1

No problem! I wish you the best of luck!
/r/MensRights06/07/25 10:25 AM
14

u/Money_Bus3234 you say you love this girl, but at the risk of sounding callous and heartless, I'm going to say, so what if you love her? Your love should only be a relevant factor in your decision if and only if she reciprocates your love. If she doesn't, then why should you treat her with love when she treats you so inconsiderately? A person's love is visible through their actions, not their words, because actions require them to demonstrate they actually commit to what they claim. When you're…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 10:14 AM
2

u/SanguinPanguin I'll just draw your attention to this part of your post: "but I feel like if I'm making any progress at all it's hard to give up on." I'd like to emphasize the part where you said "I'm making progress". First off the bat, it sounds dangerously similar to the sunk cost fallacy. You feel that, if you dump her, you'll lose the time spent making progress. To this, I urge you to bear in mind that the time you've spent is already spent, gone and never to return. If you have serious do…
/r/MensRights05/07/25 04:57 PM
13

The vast majority of men who are abusive know very well that society frowns upon their actions but, like you pointed out, simply don't care what others think, so shaming them and calling them out is at most ineffectual and if it's coming from a man, it may even be seen as a challenge to their manhood and cause them to double down on their behavior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/25 10:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter