TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Unsmurfme Archive

View 1 post and 71 comments by Unsmurfme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
47

You’re the slut, she’s using you. Women have agency too and she’s paying for nice things. If you enjoy being used then no one loses.
/r/askTRP04/04/21 08:53 PM
1

They aren’t getting the money. They are being sold as sex slaves in countries where it’s against the law to disobey their husbands, who bought them from another man.
/r/askTRP14/03/21 03:03 PM
0

You know, I found a box of my exes stuff when I moved. If I had her contact info still I’d text her to let her know I found it because I’m a decent person. Occam’s razor fuckers. Not everything is a shit test. And if it is, you just cut it there.
/r/askTRP07/12/20 12:55 AM
22

He’s in a relationship and is happy there. Don’t fuck shit up for stupid reasons.
/r/askTRP09/10/20 07:21 PM
6

It isn’t all and it isn’t most. But it’s still enough to burn you. There’s a reason this place is quarantined. It’s not that no truth is spoken here, it’s that people take the worst 50% and call them 100% of women. Some things here are good, like self respect and demanding respect or moving on. Some are not. You’re 17. Don’t call the world black or white yet. Learn the shades of grey.
/r/askTRP27/07/20 06:49 PM
1

Electricians in my area make $74.70 an hour in pay and benefits. It’s going up soon. You can also get into maintenance, which is a cushy job but usually pays less unless it’s industrial (every big machine everywhere needs an electrician to do maintenance, as does every big office building). You can make over 6 grand in an AC building in the trades. Especially if you’re smart with a high work ethic. You’re trading 2 years of college for 3-4 years of well paid internship though (still need 2 years…
/r/askTRP12/07/20 10:41 PM
0

Asylee status and funding? What are you talking about? Police defunding? That’s local, not federal. Gay marriage? In what world is that far left crazy? Sanctuary city laws? That’s local not federal. And a blanket term. And the conservative Supreme Court ruled that ICE couldn’t arrest people at court houses for pressing charges on other people. Which is really the driving force between a lot of those sanctuary city laws.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/20 11:24 PM
0

I said 10%, which would be 24. I think that’s fair. Can you name 24 crazy lefty democrats in the house? 5 in the senate? I can find at least 100 crazy right Republicans in the house. They’re the norm. When normal Mitt Romney/McCain/Bush/etc. type Republicans take the party back I’ll consider them again. Right now the crazies are in charge on the right.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 11:39 PM
1

Read this bud: There are two paths that seem the most helpful. Please know the strategies might be very different if you were younger. But at 22 I think these might be the most reasonable ways to move forward. The first thing is to use this feeling of betrayal (your mom lying to you, and betraying the family) as a catalyst for your own growth and development. While it might seem ubiquitous, cheating on one’s spouse is still a devastation to everyone involved. But this devastation can be fertile …
/r/askTRP26/06/20 04:40 PM
3

There’s one way it works. You see her, you ask her if she minds if you run with her. She says yes. You don’t say a word and run with her. She breaks off to leave, you say thanks for running with you and tell her you’ll be here tomorrow and the next day at X time. Get there 5-10 minutes early and legit stretch for 30 minutes. It’s good for ya. If she shows up great. Stretching is always enjoyable with a hottie. If not you legit stretched like you should then had a run. No creepy shit. She wants t…
/r/askTRP23/06/20 03:36 AM
2

Focus on long term health. Don’t focus on being pretty short term. You gotta let that shit go. As for looks, women like strong more than they like skinny. Cutting the last 5 lbs of fat isn’t as attractive as getting another pound of muscle. If you like skinny that’s fine. But it sounds like you’re walking down a dysmorphia path. You can’t fixate on that it’s not healthy.
/r/askTRP23/06/20 03:30 AM
50

You should set terms that address both of your needs. You need this time to do this thing. She needs this attention. I’ve had past girlfriends like this where I’d read my book with her laying on my lap on the couch and my hand on her ass petting her. I preferred my hand on her ass while I read, so this was a good “compromise” where I got more out of it than reading alone and she got the affection she needed out of it. So if she needs more physical contact, do it in a way that benefits you as wel…
/r/askTRP23/06/20 12:26 AM
3

Hold on now. She's openly sharing this information with you and being honest and respectful. She's talking to you about a hot girl, why would she think you'd have issues with that if you made her think otherwise? If you have brought up a fantasy about her and another girl in the past and she's thinks you'd be happy thinking about her and another hot woman, well you get what she thought you wanted. What's the problem?
/r/askTRP20/06/14 02:15 AM
2

The word is pleasure, not enlightenment. You use sex for pleasure. You share that pleasure with another human being. You give them pleasure as they give it to you. And if you're lucky, you love them for the person they are. If not, you just enjoy the good sex. The problem is in TRP that act of love and pleasure devalues another human being rather then values them. What the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 09:02 AM
8

Sex is valuable to women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 08:58 AM
3

I think you're questioning the wrong thing. I don't know that TRPs actually value sex more then anyone else. It's that they devalue it's importance for women (among other things). Women are a puzzle to be figured out, not an equal to share your life with. Valuing yourself is great. Valuing sex for yourself is great. We agree on that. What we disagree on is valuing your partner and valuing sex for your partner. A blue piller probably says it's great that they had it in their lives before I met th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 08:55 AM
2

"slutty" is basically the opposite of "hypergamy" you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 08:41 AM
1

Yes, and the law is more than OK with it as well. And yes, it happens plenty. You don't flip a coin, you go to court and the judge decides what's best for the child in his/her opinion. Often they decide on joint custody. You don't have to pay child support if you're the one supporting the child you know. There are mommy states and daddy states, as they are called. Some favor one gender more often then the other. Show you're the better parent with the better environment for the kid and you don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 08:05 AM
-2

Yes. Most people agree that you have a moral and legal obligation to take care of your own child. Putting your child up for adoption is a perfectly respectable way to take care of them. Not paying or participating while mom raises it is not. Both parents have the right to waive adoption rights, forcing the other parent to help. Still right no matter how much you wish it wasn't. And safe haven laws were not designed for the parents, they were designed for the kids. If mom (or dad) takes care of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 08:29 PM
-2

I followed it just fine. You are responsible for your own birth control. If that birth control fails, you are responsible for the child. Man or woman, it's the same either way. Some people believe in pro-life, some believe in a woman's right to choose what happens to her own body. That's the only form of birth control a man has no say in, but he can have the equivalent birth control in a vasectomy any time he wants. No one believes that once you create a child that either parent gets to abandon …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 08:08 PM
-2

No, you're not suggesting that the right to choose when to become a parent is a fundamental right. It IS a fundamental right already. What's not a fundamental right is to make a baby then not take care of it. You chose to make it, now you have to deal with it. If you don't want babies, GET A VASECTOMY. You have the right to do that instead of getting a childish tattoo. If you didn't choose to make that baby, it's called rape and you have a fundamental right not to be raped. I find it hilarious t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 07:40 PM
-1

What's creepy is the red pill focusing on 18 year old girls for 35 year old men. What's NOT creepy is point out that TRPs are doing it, while making an argument that they also are not responsible for getting that girl pregnant. You guys are despicable and fool no one. So you're suggesting that a 35 year old who verbally lowers an 18 year old girl's confidence, studies pick up artist techniques, has a tattoo on his arm that say "not responsible for your baby", therefore does not have to care for …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 06:59 PM
-2

Yes I did. I directly and absolutely countered it. You can not opt out of parenthood after getting an 18 year old girl pregnant. Whether you brought it up or not, that's what you are saying. That you should be able to get a teenage "adult" pregnant and then opt out of paying for your child. Can we all agree you said that? That that's what it means to opt out of paying for a child if you get an 18 year old pregnant? And can we all agree that TRP advocates 18 year olds as "ideal" age for women for…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 03:29 PM
-4

I did address the hypothetica. I'm sorry you're still too stupid to understand basic English. Stop advocating that red pill middle aged men should target 18 year old girls to have sex with by demeaning them as people and training them to be obedient/submit then saying "and if they get pregnant, men shouldn't have to pay for it". Red Pill theory is not just terrible. It gets worse and worse when you connect the dots. It's like you guys think that by advocating these things separately that it's le…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 03:19 PM
2

You didn't refute it the second time, then left that out. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 03:15 PM
-2

Listen tweedle dumb. Nobody is forcing a man to become a father. He's becoming a father by his own choice. You can't have sex, make a baby, then not pay for that child. As someone who has equal rights, you have the right to do all the work of raising that child yourself and having a woman pay alimony if you want. It happens plenty. But no one made you become a father, that would be rape. You understand what "make you become a father" means right? I'm pretty sure you're not understanding the basi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 03:08 PM
1

So, you're not saying fathers should have the right to not pay for their own children? Because that's what I asked word for word and your response was "nope". And if that is what you were saying, then you blatantly lied the first time I asked it. You understand that if a 35 year old man from the red pill gets an 18/19 year old girl pregnant, that man is the father and that is his child even if he doesn't want the kid. And since that's what the manosphere advocates as the ideal male/female relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 03:03 PM
2

What's fail is that you outright lied in your first response. "So you're saying fathers should have the right to not pay for their own children?" "Nope". That's what's fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 02:46 PM
1

You know when someone knows their argument is wrong when they hedge like this. The answer is yes, you are saying that fathers should have the right to not pay for their own children and you don't have the backbone to say it in plain terms. I understand pro-life, it's the belief that an unborn fetus is a life and that it's immoral to kill that life. What's the moral reasoning that men shouldn't be responsible for caring for and paying for a child they created with a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 05:02 AM
0

So, you're not suggesting men should have the right to not pay for their own children?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 04:51 AM
3

TRP is not neutral on homosexuality. They are by and large pro-gay rights. What they are not is a serious discussion site, and that response is comedic gold when compared to Red Pillers calling themselves Alphas. You seriously need to look up the definition of satire.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 04:50 AM
-1

So, you're saying fathers should have the right to not pay for their own children? And can we all agree on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 04:28 AM
3

It was a German philosopher's response to the failings of fascism in 1947 I believe. This is what he thought of Hitler and the Nazis, basically. And in what world does the red pill even remotely support homosexuality? You guys are so anti-gay that the joke sticks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 04:22 AM
1

I'm kind of ashamed of you, since you're asking. As for the thread...this is marxist propaganda to you? According to their own constitution, the he-men would thus be what they are usually presented as in film scripts, masochists. The lie is concealed in their sadism, and it is as liars that they truly become sadists, agents of repression. That lie is nothing other than repressed homosexuality, which emerges as the only approved form of what is heterosexual. In Oxford one can differentiate betwee…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 04:13 AM
3

I don't want the government to have my genetic material on file. What the hell is wrong with you knuckleheads. Anyone who wants a paternity test can get one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 03:58 AM
2

Still nothing? Just have to quote and link to marxist threads. Not that hard to do if they exist in mass quantities like you declare.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 03:55 AM
5

Quote the threads with marxist propaganda please.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 03:04 AM
7

Um, sure. Go ahead and link to all those marxists propaganda threads to brainwash the masses. Unless you're lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 02:50 AM
11

Marxist? Is that really what you got out of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 09:50 PM
4

BP is really just a satire site that does the service of allowing you to comment on Red Pill philosophy while disagreeing with it. The mods at red pill simply delete any argument that debunks their version of reality then bans people who made it. Any respectful and intelligent debate long ago left that site. In fact, the most respectful, intelligent and non-offensive rebuttal to the red pill philosophy was linked on a thread in their side bar (which was the start of the conversation not the end)…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 08:28 PM
1

Well, my advice is to be normal and talk to them like people (pretty much the same way). Talking to a girl you're attracted to like a guy (or like a girl you're not attracted to) is sound feminist advice on how to date. I guess i don't understand why you'd argue against feminists on feminist dating advice. You do realize that's what feminists have been saying for 50 years right? They problem comes when you treat women as "different'. People is people, just talk to them the same and the ones that…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 07:27 PM
2

Ya, sorry wasn't correcting just adding in. Of course, plenty of women are doms too and plenty of men are subs. I'd bet good money that plenty of red pillers would actually enjoy a woman dom "owning" them and using them as her play toy. A little hurt, a little reward, a little encouragement. :) BDSM is really good about equality. Subs can decide they want to be switches, and then dominate and be dominated. Everyone is an equal generally, and people are welcome to choose their own roles and bound…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 07:23 PM
1

How many decades did it take America to "fall down"? 7? How much better off is America then every other place in the world besides Canada for wages? And is Canada the system you'd like to mimic, as they are more socialistic? Where are the pure capitalist societies from 50 years ago? Did they grow more or less then America as we have instituted all those socialist programs? The problem with your theory is the facts disagree with you over and over and over again. Anyone who takes a look at states …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 07:20 PM
5

I'm BP and have 3 brothers and a sister. 5 kids in 6 1/2 years, it was a crazy household. 2 brothers and my sister are happily married with kids and good marriages. 1 brother and myself still single, but generally do well with dating. My dad actually said to me "I wish I had figured out how to date like you guys when I was your age" which made me feel a lot better about not having a relationship work out yet. I have no idea how much having a sister effected me with women's issues. I feel like I …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:58 PM
4

Blue Pill is cringepics for Red Pill. Purple Pill is "meh, I think they're wrong about a ton of stuff but I don't cringe at it". Blue pill is not a philosophy, more a reaction to red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:54 PM
2

Actually, BDSMers laugh at 50 shades of grey too. But in a "that's cute" way. With Red Pill/Manosphere it's more like "what the hell is wrong with those guys". There's way more women looking for a good dom then there are good doms. But Red Pillers talk about dominating women and clearly have no idea how to do it in ways women enjoy. If you want a woman to submit, go learn the right way not the TRP way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:42 PM
1

That's pretty much what TBP is dude. Cringepics for TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:37 PM
1

Yes, many of us do realize how much we lack introspection. In general I think blue pillers look at other people's points of view to see what they are wrong about within their own beliefs and actually take other people's opinions on their own actions as a rule. That's generally considered a feminine quality, although I consider "feminine qualities" to be a silly categorization as men and women carry both feminine and masculine "qualities" and in general those have more to do with what you've been…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:37 PM
2

It's not my fundamental misunderstanding. That's the standard explanation on The Red Pill and has been for a long time. They also discuss how randomly "punishing" and "rewarding" women in relationships engenders more trust and love then just treating her well. That's textbook abuse. The rest of us are not the ones coming up with these things. That is red pill theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:22 PM
1

What does he think about Germany? It's basically a Democratic utopia, with unions and government having far more power in private business. China, Germany, and the US are the manufacturing power houses. Doesn't that go against his crazy theories about government involvement/taking over the economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:19 PM
1

Not according to Red Pill Theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:01 PM
1

No one said you were trying to lower your male friend's self esteem. Why are you bringing up banter, who's goal is to have fun, and comparing it with negging, who's goal is specifically to make women question themselves and lower their self esteem?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 05:48 PM
9

BP doesn't argue. They are satire and quasi-disbelief. The opposite of red pill is reality, not blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 05:40 PM
0

"Women who do this are committing a crime" Right with ya buddy. Just like fraud? 100% with ya. Just like stealing? Close, I think fraud is better. Rape? You think that's rape? WTF is wrong with you? IN WHAT FUCKED UP SENSE OF MORALITY IS STEALING RESOURCES THE SAME THING AS RAPE? And that's ignoring the fact that his statistic (1 in 10 kids are someone else's dad?) is clearly suspect. The stat is not that important, though. Fraud does not equal rape. Even when they are someone you love and trust…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 03:23 AM
6

The law says you must go through a licensed physician or else you're not disavowing your parental rights. This is idiotic on both parts. The guy could have said, at any time, that he wanted his rights as a father and the courts would have granted them to him. It's just bad decision making, learning a minimal amount about the law is pretty much required. It's not just that he might be liable for child support, it's that he could have taken their kid away because they were too lazy to pay a doctor…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 02:48 AM
1

No, YOU'RE the one who was making a point. I'm the one who was staying on topic while you deflected and insulted feminism. Man, you really play that victim card well don't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/14 03:36 PM
2

0 stars is not 0, it's unrated. Every single person on OK Cupid has 0 stars if you don't rate them. Every last one. So the millions of people on OKC, 0 stars. The 95 people you rated, 1-5 stars. Now since you're not understanding OKC numbers, let me help you. When asshole men send 500 women sexually explicit messages, they do 2 things. 1) They rate them 1 star. 2) They block them. Understand? You're using a rating system that is designed to punish assholes, and then claiming that rating system i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/14 12:24 AM
1

I'm not putting words in your mouth, you're putting words into feminists mouths. I asked simple questions, and instead of answering those questions you just badmouthed people you don't agree with. The thread asked which principles of feminism you disagreed with. No one asked you if feminists are stupid or if there was no discrimination of any kind in the country. We asked you if you disagreed with the basic principles. You do not in fact disagree with feminist principles. You don't even appear t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/14 12:10 AM
5

Wow, you can't bring yourself to say "yes, sex/gender discrimination should be illegal and yes it should be enforced if/when it happens." You could have even added "but no case of sexual discrimination exists in the entire country. Not one anywhere." and you would have answered the question. If you agree with feminists on what the law should be, we don't have a problem. People have to prove sexual discrimination, so as long as there are laws and enforcement feminists are happy. Why don't you agr…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 11:27 PM
2

Both of those links are people speculating. That is like saying it here, then linking to you saying it here as your source. It's not a source. From the Reddit link you supplied: It's not a zero rating. It's blank. It says exactly what I said in the link you provided by someone else in that link. From me being on OKC for years, I can tell you it's not a 0 star rating when you skip people, it's just nothing. It actually says "RATE OR SKIP". If you skip, it doesn't rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 11:15 PM
3

Yes, you are very adamant that no companies in the United States discriminate against women in any way. And since that is factually quite easy to prove or disprove, that is not the question is it. I'm asking you a simple question about values. Are you too spineless to answer it? Do you think it should be against the law to discriminate against women or not? Do you think that the law should say that you can't pay someone less because they are a certain race, gender, etc.? And if you agree that it…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 10:51 PM
2

I'll ask again. Do you think women being paid less money as a standard pratice is "equal rights"? Or do you think that is sex-based discrimination? I did not ask if you believed it was happening. I hope I don't have to explain basic English every question.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 10:39 PM
2

No, it doesn't. It only counts the ones you've rated.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 10:38 PM
4

Feminism does not say "all the same". It says "equal rights". Do you think women being paid less money as a standard practice is "equal rights"? Or do you think that is sex-based discrimination. Feminists say a company with a policy to pay women less because they are women is discrimination. Just like paying blacks less because they are black would be. Do you dispute that many companies (and/or departments within the company) discriminate? Should that be in the "equal socially, economically, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 10:11 PM
1

So let's say, then, that "already having rights" is not a principle of feminism. Instead, the principle would be "all genders and sexes should have equal rights". Let's just assume that that's what "principle" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 10:02 PM
0

You can't rate people 0 stars.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 09:56 PM
4

http://health.howstuffworks.com/relationships/marriage/debunking-divorce-myths.htm#page=9 For the US it's about the same too.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 09:12 PM
2

I could be wrong, but I thought with some small tweeking this was actually pretty in line with red pill thinking.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 07:01 PM
1

You have to fund that stuff, and it's always the first thing Republicans cut and refuses to re-fund.
/r/RedPillWomen30/05/14 04:24 PM
1

Doh! Meant to put this in another thread. Oh well, here it stays.
/r/RedPillWomen20/05/14 12:19 AM
3

Never ask a redpiller what feminism is, never ask a feminist what redpillers are. Never ask a Democrat what a Republican is, never ask a Republican what a Democrat is. When one party defines itself by how bad the other party is, they don't have much to stand on. That will always be true. I'm very much an alpha, whether I wanted to be or not, but I identify very well with feminism. I really haven't been involved in this cultural stuff for over a decade (I'm 37) and I just got on Reddit recently. …
/r/RedPillWomen20/05/14 12:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter