TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UnusualMeaning2170 Archive

View 7 posts and 130 comments by UnusualMeaning2170 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

she could've done that a myriad of ways, the fact that this was the first insult that said feminist went for is very telling, not to mention that this seems to be a repeating pattern among said group of people.
/r/AllPillDebate08/07/23 01:52 AM
2

her pretty much backtracking on all the arguments she made with what she decided to use as an insult isn't just lazy arguments, lol, but alright.
/r/AllPillDebate07/07/23 12:10 AM
2

i expect this from average women, not self proclaimed feminists, but, alas, AWALT
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 11:46 PM
3

called her argument retarded, not her, try working on your reading comprehension, no insults were addressed to her as a person. she literally quoted buzzfeed, like, lmao.
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 11:44 PM
2

feminism in and of itself is dishonest, of course it's prone to bad actors of both genders.
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 11:42 PM
8

then don't expect this : "Male participation in feminism is generally encouraged by feminists and is seen as an important strategy for achieving full societal commitment to gender equality."(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism) to happen anytime soon
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 11:30 PM
1

so many feminists do this that it's become centerfold to the movement, we can argue wether or not it is what feminism is, but when so many people are exposed to this type of behaviour we can't be shocked that they'll treat the movement with discontent.
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 08:44 PM
2

it's not contrived to just reddit, this is a pattern of behaviour that just so happened to repeat here.
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 07:59 PM
3

that is not going to happen, neurodivergence and autism in men is barely thought of as a problem societally, the psychological field is very much stunted when it comes to the mental problems men face (https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-men/202202/why-so-many-men-resist-talking-about-their-mental-health), and people then go on to ask why they're not willing to meet halfway, as if what they're doing nowadays can be in any way shape or form considered ""halfway"".
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 04:47 PM
1

https://www.bradley.edu/sites/bodyproject/male-body-image-m-vs-f/ A massive “95% of college age men are dissatisfied with their bodies on some level” (Daniel & Bridges 2013). this shit is not gendered, this was literally the first result searching "body image men statistics". couple this with the fact nowadays most of these men aren't in relationships either, men have an actual good reason to feel this way, it's not hard to extrapolate why most end up being suicidal, leading to a 4x higher rate …
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 04:45 PM
1

the irony of you saying i'm denying reality when all you can muster as an example is a book and an article XD
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 02:20 PM
5

yes, this doesn't stop to just autism, neurodivergency in general for men is a death sentence in terms of dating. don't shift the goal posts, i'm talking about wether or not they get in a relationship, not if they're being abused. yeah, no, you can't just state that all autistic women get abused if they end up in a relationship. this problem is societal, there is no shortage of well put together men, and i'm talking men who don't know what pills are, just a shortage of ones enough to fit women's…
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 02:18 PM
1

because your whole argument rests on a biased book and a buzzfeed article, muh "beauty myth" has no legs to stand on for actual statistics, i'm doing you a service calling it just "fucking retarded".
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 02:10 PM
8

this shit goes beyond an attitude problem for it to be this big of a disparity between men and women, stop coping.
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 02:08 PM
5

*just autistic and neurodivergent women, not men. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/13306923/Power_et_al_2012_23147713_322.pdf https://i.redd.it/gqrnmuljq7141.png
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 01:11 PM
1

when your main point of evidence is a site widely know for low effort clickbait it's hard for me to take you serious. at the end of the day not only is it still men killing themselves in droves compared to women, their insecurity borders on delusion when most of them, statistically, have no problem getting in a relationship. using twitter as evidence is fucking retarded.
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 12:59 PM
1

buzzfeed XDDD
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 12:44 PM
12

don't ever get up
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 12:12 PM
1

you keep mentioning this community as if it has any bearing on real life because it's the only shred of evidence you have left to stave yourself off of putting in any effort to lock chad in. yeah, unfirtunately for you most men like women to be the same bmi as them, but most women across all age cohorts get partnered anyway, so even at your current weight, it might be marginally more difficult than it would be at an average bmi, boo hoo. stats directly disprove whatever retarded argument you've …
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 12:03 PM
1

this "pull worth out of nowhere" bull is very easy for women to parrot when they aren't the ones killing themselves in droves. we'll see how a vast majority of dudes in their 20s not being able to be partnered leads us. reminder that lack of a relationship is the first insult women like to hang over mens heads, despite how "not important" it may seem. not to mention whatever study there was outlining how happy women were single alone was debunked, and to even rightfully prove how much better it …
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 11:58 AM
1

that's not the point, the only for sex shit is a red herribg since, like i said, most women in their 20s get in relationshops while most men don't
/r/AllPillDebate06/07/23 11:52 AM
1

gss? really? https://twitter.com/BackmanDaniel/status/1591189079781040128 what's the sample size this time?
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 08:28 AM
2

then they're dating their tulpas i guess, lol , cause they're not dating their counterparts
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 08:25 AM
1

because there was no point of contention to my point in that part, lol, in every single one of those studies (not considering the fact that, yknow, besides the pew study for which we know for a fact was 1000 from 18-29) had a higher % of men taht were lonely
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 08:24 AM
1

Yeah, you're doing something incorrectly. I'm able to recreate the 51% men and 32% women numbers from this Pew article using the October 2019 data. I used the same approach for Feb 2022. In the same thread.
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 08:10 AM
1

what other polls? links? could be difference in sample size, questions asked, etc.. but pew seems the most comprehensive in terms of both. but again, since most of the "lgbtq" % is either non binary or bisexual taht still dates the opposite gender, it doesn't make the main statistic useless or affected to the point it can't be taken into account
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 08:06 AM
1

being partnered still should get rid of that insecurity most of all, since, you know, it's in essence the highest proclamation of worth looks wise, having someone choose you long term. for settling, since women are the gatekeepers it's on them to stop choosing men that they're not 100% about, and by what they think of the average man's appearance that'd be most of them, lmao
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 08:04 AM
1

said "oversampling" couldn't affect the stats to the point they were useless, especially considering most lgbt people are bisexuals that still date the opposite gender
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 08:02 AM
7

dudes in the higher cohort of relationships, 30s and up, that's why signleness in men at that cohort is much lower.
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 07:49 AM
3

if you'll continue to turn a blind spot to the whole point of the conversation then i don't see much of a point. clearly if men only thought of women as fucktoys most wouldn't stay partnered to such vile creatures, right? but most do, so maybe they aren't actually treated taht way. they go out of their way to find a relationship even knowing that they're happier alone (the study that said so was flawed by the way, the one by dolan)
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 07:48 AM
10

but they don't, that's teh whole point, lol, 63% of men aren't in a relationship while 34% of women are.
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 07:46 AM
3

relevant to the fact that they're definitely not getting partnered to their 20s counterparts, so who else? on your other point, it's the women considering themselves unnattractive and average, men find most women attractive. if she can find a relationship, she is attractive, it's that simple.
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 07:41 AM
3

most get in relationships with guys in their 30s though, not harems, even though there are chads there aren't enough to fuck around to the point that it's double the difference gap, relationships, good or not, still give hope that you're attractive enough that you are able to get in one, in comparison to most current gen men who don't even get the opportunity to find out what it is they want in a relationship
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 07:33 AM
5

you don't get how a proclamation of enough attraction to your personality and physical traits for a long term relationship aren't enough? then yeah i don't know what to tell you. and no, they really don't since most of them seem to have no problems getting in relationship in either chads harem or dudes in their 30s who are willing to daddy them, since most current generation dudes are alone and most women aren't.
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 07:20 AM
9

lol, now imagine having no one show any sign of attraction towards you. the fact that women get this insecure while being in a relationship, which should be enough on it's own, coupled with amount of validation they do get on average pretty much says it all
/r/AllPillDebate05/07/23 07:09 AM
8

just become more physically fit and better at martial arts than 99% of the male population to make up for the hair follicles on your scalp bro, women don't like gymbros btw XD
/r/AllPillDebate23/06/23 09:22 PM
3

all gay dudes in the comments XDD
/r/AllPillDebate23/06/23 09:21 PM
1

you can have the best statisticians in check theyre still self reported and them being anonymous doesnt stop people from lying, even to themselves as societally nowadays men are just shutting down from a variety of reasons notwithstanding dating, telling themselves theyre just finding themselves in their 20s when theyre just shut out of dating. your claim of ugly women not getting in relationships is still nil.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 11:52 PM
1

sure, but I'll rely on hypotheticals as you have in the op and say a good % of those men ""willingly lonely"" have probably tried and become jaded ny rejection, saying theyre willingly lonely to save face. its weird that we dont see the same in women, especially when they love to claim theyre so much happier lonely, and women love to say how desperate men are for a relationship, why is that not the case now? regardless most men nowadays arent naturally fostering relationhships with women and i h…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 11:46 PM
1

sure, the premise of your op was still " ugly women being ignored" when this is clearly not the case, especially with the current generation and with the gap between men and women regarding loneliness. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 11:36 PM
1

63% of men aren't in relationships, and 34% of women aren't. taking these simple statistics in mind there's no weighing around wether or not its easy for women to secure a relationship regardless of attractiveness, them getting lied to and used for sex is fear mongering or used as a barebones debate tactic, studies clearly show that young women across most classes of attraction, by their own admission have no problem getting a relationship in comparison to men, and taking into account the gap be…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 11:09 PM
2

literally every extremist post back in the day over on r/incels that the inceltear toddlers loved to cherrypick was downvoted to shit and most of the commenters we're calling them out for being glowies or borderline retarded, it's not a coincidence most of them screenshot only the text, not the comments or how many upvotes/downvotes the post had. even that fat retard boardgaming would tell you the same shit. the front page was full of funny as shit self deprecating jokes.
/r/AllPillDebate13/05/23 04:58 PM
10

current studies show that % are nigh equal https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/12x4v1c/i_wish_mainstream_mens_issues_advocates_discussed/
/r/AllPillDebate06/05/23 06:09 AM
13

yaaas kween current generation men are single at almost double the % of women because of their "personalities" even though more often that not women fail miserably when judged by the same qualities as portrayed by pretty much every other study of a woman trying to use tinder as a man, ftm trans, and biggest of all norah vincent, and even lesbian women themselves, so true
/r/AllPillDebate06/05/23 06:08 AM
1

then they probably should be more honest about why the vast majority of average current generation women are not getting in relationships with men, and not cope with personality when most of them fail their own threshold
/r/AllPillDebate06/05/23 06:05 AM
3

you have no data to prove your point so i accept your concession i guess, i have at least an inkling of one by women's self admission to mostly be friends with women only rather than men, all you have is "most women have male friends"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 12:58 PM
4

lol, no https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/articles-reports/2021/12/16/yougov-friendship-study-part-four-friendship-and-g Women are more likely than men to mostly have friends of their own gender
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 12:34 PM
1

it's a cope because of that 50% of the total population that are religious, most are past 30, like 40% minimum. young people are not being held single by religion, and even so chastity would be even more prized in women than in men so why are more women in relationships than men, lmao? marrying can be postponed but men can still be in a relationship in their 20s (provided the average current gen woman is attracted to them which seems to no longer be the case, thus the gap of double the %), peopl…
/r/AllPillDebate05/05/23 03:31 AM
1

i wasnt talking about total % singleness, but the one of current generation men which is 63%. lmfao at religion keeping 25% of the 63 single, fantastic cope, especially when the current generation has the highest % of non religious people. beyond 30s has no basis on what's happening in the current dating market and how much worse it's likely going to get in the future.
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 05:26 PM
2

i addressed this in the op bro, women are clearly put off,by their own words, by casual sex. the % of men attractive enough for women to get past that ick and fuck around represents a virtually insignificant % of the men making up the gap in singleness, 99% of the men in that % gap of singleness aren't going to be having sex unless it's under the prospects of a relationship, and since 63% aren't in one it's dire
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 06:47 AM
10

i do not gaf about what you think of men in this community man, this is a pew study , and the sample size for people aged 18-29 was 1000, this is not redditors we're talking about, it's your average guy.
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 06:37 AM
9

to get to the point of interpersonal communication skills where women see you as a dating prospect you have to pass a looks threshold the average man isn't currently to the average woman, this is gigacope, the problem goes beyond ""communication"" for the % gap in singlehood to be this large, lmao. men in their 30s have financial stability and chads in their 20s have the unfailable rizz of looks (and being able to practice said interpersonal skills in a way conducive to a relationship because pe…
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 06:23 AM
11

they have no problem relating to chads or men in their 30s willing to daddy them, since, like the OP clearly says, a mere 34% of them aren't in a relationship in their 20s, so relating is clearly not the crux of it. this cope of the average man not being emotionally empathetic is shut down by pretty much every other man you ask who will tell you the experiences he's had talking about his problems the same way women do, to said women.
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 06:15 AM
8

we're past pulling bootstraps with the stats we currently have. current generation average women are simply not attracted to current generation average men.
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 06:10 AM
4

you are projecting how insecure you are in your masculinity, the % of men 18-29 single is too high to put the blame on fear of rejection
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 05:24 AM
1

what a percentage to pull out of your own ass, lmao
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 05:10 AM
3

and yeah, not only are you projecting big time stats this high in singleness can't just be caused by fear of rejection
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 04:58 AM
3

projection is not an argument
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 04:35 AM
4

you showed that strawman what for buddy
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 04:35 AM
4

when a study is done outlining that 63% of current generation men are single in comparison to 34% of women, this cope that "muh ugly men don't go for their counterparts" will remain nothing but a retarded cope. what you hear and see doesn't mean shit to actual data points telling us that women are getting in relationships no problem, and taking into account the percentage in comparison to men's thats regardless of appearance.
/r/AllPillDebate04/05/23 03:32 AM
1

yeah and I'm saying the situation where women are ok with being in chads rotation by feigning commitment barely puts a dent in making up the percentage of single men, like women have to be fooling themselves theyre their only one because chad is just that attractive,and men that attractive are a very small part of the population . and yeah I'm gonna take pews word for wether or not it's representative.
/r/AllPillDebate28/04/23 07:24 PM
2

guess it's my fault for taking women at their word when they say casual sex is the big bad and they only have sex in a relationship, lmao. if you genuinely think the "chad that says he's single to exercise his options" makes up anything even close to a significant percentage point of the men that are lonely, taking into account not only what i previously said about women just being put off by casual sex in general but for them to not be affected by that ick, how attractive you have to be as a ma…
/r/AllPillDebate28/04/23 07:01 PM
0

not taking n count into account, there's a bigger percentage of men having sex than women PERIOD, even if we take the median and prove a smaller % of men are having a lot of sex, there is a bigger number of men on average that do have sex even once than women per total.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 09:46 PM
1

so in your example there's a bigger number of men having sex than women, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 09:28 PM
-1

Sure there may be a small percentage of men who have more sex, but the thing is there's also a bigger percentage of men having sex than women PERIOD, so yeah the median may prove there are a lot of fuckboys, but it's useless for your argument of men being more sexless if per total there are more men having sex at all than women are
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 09:27 PM
2

the median is useless for your argument of men being more sexless if per total there are more men having sex than women are
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 09:24 PM
-2

more women report having no sex or a low nr of sexual partners than men. "https://datepsychology.com/how-many-sexual-partners-did-men-and-women-have-in-2021/".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 07:25 PM
0

in all of these scenarios of 5 and 5 you guys think that of the 5 women all are willing to have sex, that's the problem. the data shows that more women are choosing not to than men https://datepsychology.com/how-many-sexual-partners-did-men-and-women-have-in-2021/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 07:20 PM
2

there's still a higher % of women than men who report not having sex at all or having a low number of sexual partners compared to men, specifically in the 18-25 and 26-30 graphs here https://datepsychology.com/how-many-sexual-partners-did-men-and-women-have-in-2021/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 06:55 PM
-2

Regardless of the difference in definition, many of the men here rush to exclaim how hard they have it in terms of both sex and relationships, but the data shows that it's more men than women that are fucking around, and that the experience of the average man isn't abject sexlessness, as they claim the pew data shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 06:48 PM
0

or more women compared to men could just not be having sex at all or report a low number of sexual partners as shown here "https://datepsychology.com/how-many-sexual-partners-did-men-and-women-have-in-2021/"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 06:44 PM
3

Could you point me to the data regarding skew in number of partners? I got my data for average sex partners from GSS (https://datepsychology.com/how-many-sexual-partners-did-men-and-women-have-in-2021/) and CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n-keystat.htm)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 06:33 PM
6

I trust the judgement of the pew statisticians, especially considering they had a big enough data set to make up for these kinds of discrepancies
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 06:30 PM
–

how is it not? when researchers rely on self-reported data, they are inherently limited by how honest and accurate the respondents are, putting bias into the results, some respondents over or under-reporting.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 01:13 AM
–

there is also a lot of literature mentioning the validity problems of self reported studies. i talk about them because a lot of people, in this sub specifically, use links to these studies like they're psalms out of the bible, when, as i mentioned beforehand, there are a lot of variables at hand making them unreliable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 01:03 AM
–

there's a major problem with your analogy, what you're measuring for is inherently measurable, immutable at the moment of weighting, facts. these studies, both pew and gss, are self reported. the subject matter itself makes it dependent on a larger sample size.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:48 AM
–

That’s not true. Power is determined by the type of effect you expect to find and type of analysis. A small sample size can have the perfect amount of power (.8) if it aligns with the type of analysis and size of the expected effect size. You can actually have too big of a sample/too much power and find an effect when there isn’t one. All this to say, it’s not usually a great criticism. too much power is not a common issue in most research studies, if you want to talk about criticism that isn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:33 AM
–

Having a small sample size doesn’t inherently mean less reliability. Do you know what a power analysis is? sure, it may not mean less reliability, but it's power is inherently decreased because of it's size, and so is the risk of sampling error, making it difficult to generalize these results to the larger population. alas these aren't the only problems, like i mentioned, there's also the potential for sampling bias and nonresponse bias, which further reduces the reliability of these findings.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 12:18 AM
–

the gss study still has a relatively small sample size in comparison, especially for the 18-29 range, making it less reliable. not to mention the geographical contrasts you mentioned which i didn't even think about, the study may only apply to the region of the respondents. also, sampling skew can still occur within the stratified samples, even if the overall sample is designed to be representative, it can happen if there is variability within the strata,and with nonresponse bias, as the respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 11:49 PM
–

that gss study that y'all love to quote that supposedly proves how men are having more sex (it was in age groups 18-22,23-25,26-30 etc, having more female respondents overall, thus skewing the data) has a total sample size from 18-29 of around 263 out of a total of 1120.. compared to the 900 just from 18-29 of the pew study. couple that with the shame of promiscuity in women driving them to respond untruthfully, and the opposite reality for men also affecting the answers.. yeah. it's like pullin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:59 PM
3

they will commit as well bruh, lets not fool ourselves with this "men are gatekeepers of relationships" bullshit when its still mostly young men that are single compared to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 06:48 PM
4

when pretty much every stat points to women consistently dating men who make more money than they do, and that's regardless of opportunity when more women are college educated then men, they just don't earn as much because they choose not to work in the same industries men do, barely work overtime and do work that's barely as dangerous, yes, it's a safe assumption that they date not only for the status that dating a man with a good career infers but also for the financial benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 07:04 AM
3

nope. supply and demand in the job market dictated that jobs men are able to do and are more frequently employed in are better paid, unfortunately for you there's no hidden cabal making sure women aren't making enough money for you to blame it on. and yes women have de facto decided that as well by paying for services and products men have built and provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 05:48 PM
3

i was again, talking about the difference in wage between the average man and woman. regardless, do you genuinely think the 1% that you mention, the ones that have the most political power and wealth, have a bearing on the well being of the average man with the stats we currently have on male suicide, homelessness, education and work related deaths that i have already mentioned several times to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 04:08 PM
5

of course men are to blame women don't work the same jobs men do, lmao. it just so happens most of the work they like doing (as if men working in jobs that they risk dying from in accidents or from exhaustion enjoy it to the fucking fullest) just isn't as laborious, not even close to as dangerous and doesn't require as many hours of work, but regardless you should be paid more, because, uhh, because we're women!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 03:31 PM
4

and it existing doesn't mean women are somehow oppressed or any less privileged, so the reason this comment chain even started, as if it somehow was a gotcha to the guy you were responding to when by all means in the dating market they are privileged was worthless. in another comment chain you also mentioned "the greater context of existence" so i decided to educate you on that as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 03:14 PM
4

i was speaking in the context of average men and women, but i guess women just can't help but focus on the money and status of a minority of men born into wealth like elon musk who have it the best when it's still men dying more by suicide, making up most of the homeless population, dying in workplace accidents, and falling behind in education.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 02:39 PM
6

and that's easily explained by the kind of work men are willing to do and the time they're willing to do it for in comparison to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:45 PM
1

And I'm just saying, if we're going by doubts and what Ifs, you're clearly not that informed either. What facts we do absolutely have, is that in a protest started by women for women there are men willing to give their lives, and as small as you consider that number to be it's still significantly more than women have in any time in history, and they in kind scoff at the thought of empathy towards any plight suffered by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 01:58 AM
2

To say that a good portion of the men dead weren't fighting for women's rights is a very big fucking cop out, yes, and frankly i was doing you a favor saying you were pretending to believe it because in good faith i can't trust you truly believe it yourself, and if you do, then we have no reason to continue discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 01:03 AM
2

yeah let's just pretend that one of the main reasons they're fighting for isn't women's rights when the whole reason the protest even started was the fact that a woman got killed for not wearing a hijab. way to be disignenuous. theocracy that infringes on women's rights, yes, so the cause is also feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 12:20 AM
9

https://iranwire.com/en/politics/110126-at-least-378-killed-in-iran-protest-crackdown-rights-group-says/ At least 378 people, including 47 children and 27 women, have been killed so far by Iranian security forces amid a crackdown on weekslong nationwide protests Can't make this shit up. 304 men, from fucking IRAN of all places, give their lives for a feminist cause, women most affected. You will never ever see this kind of action from women for men. When men are 70% of the US homeless population…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/22 11:58 PM
3

53 people sample yeah, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:21 AM
2

Sex is stigmatized for women so they're not going to say outright they super-liked a guy because they thought he was hot, but let's not delude ourselves about what's going on when there's less men having sex than women. What do you think a guy super liking a woman is gonna say? I value her looks because it shows she's ambitious enough to work on her body and that she lives a healthy lifestyle. Not to mention most people who do studies of the sort skew left so they're going to use every opportuni…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 11:20 PM
1

source? i have for what i've stated. surely you made this statement looking at studies and not out of useless anecdotes? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775719301104 also a study about how couples are now mostly meeting online so you can't argue what i said previously isn't valid. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/online-dating-big-business/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 02:58 PM
1

as kong as more men than women are lonely this doesn't track
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 09:32 AM
1

just women projecting their own behavior onto men
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 11:44 PM
1

love how the equal of a short bald man, both factors out of control, is a woman who willingly gorges on food to the point of obesity
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 06:46 PM
1

You were the one that mentioned first women being "bombarded" with messages of sex, as if it was anything more but an inconvenience since they still end up in relationships more than the men on those subs do. The burden of proof is on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:20 PM
2

Saying that in essence the only reason men fail is because they only want sex and harass women is sexist and shows what a low regard you have for men. Do you hear the way you talk about men? I state difficulty entering a relationship every time and your only response is "no they're failing because they only want sex". Wether or not you want to believe it women do like and have no problem engaging more in casual than men since there are many more men 18-29 that are sexless.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 04:02 PM
2

Reality time TV and Dr Phil? Shit, you've convinced me alright. The point was the bitching about the men contacting for sex is null because as evidenced by this sub, foreveralonedating, foreveralonewomen, 2x, no matter how neurotic, obnoxious or downright resentful they are of men they will always be able to find someone that wants to be in a relationship with them. The same doesn't stand true for their counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 03:09 PM
0

just not from men as ugly as they are lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:42 AM
1

The idea that through all this attention there wasn't a man that wanted to genuinely date is even more laughable, what proof do you have of your claims that these women were only contacted for sex when we can very well assume that some men sent pics of their own faces coupled with a hey and got rejected because the women knew they could do better physically?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:14 AM
-1

Do you have proof of your claims? Did you scour the PMs of every one of these women? I swear you people keep saying shit like this with absolutely no ground to stand on and expect people to take you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:12 AM
5

Absolutely, and the dating market is highly skewed by testosterone, giving ugly women the ego boost they need fucking men more attractive, thus our dilemma of ugly men being unwanted by their counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:05 AM
11

Based on what I've seen it's the opposite, but lets talk raw stats instead of dumb anecdotes. OLD is starting to become the main way most people are meeting up. However in every stat it's mostly men participating instead of women, wonder why? Because regardless of attractiveness for women it is easy enough to find a relationship in real life. And if they do participate on OLD the ugly woman gets more attention and thus a higher chance to get in a relationship than the man. And as it has been dus…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:02 AM
2

Men more attractive more often that not do give them attention for both relationships and sex as evidenced by sexlessness % and OLD so this claim that ugly women can't find their counterpart is baseless.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:56 AM
0

I'll call you out when you argue things i don't, deal with it. Are you seriously quoting professionals after disregarding covid XDDD this is hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:20 AM
17

It's telling how the majority members of dating woe related subs like r/foreveralone and r/virgin are men, and how in /r/ForeverAloneDating it's mostly women ending up partnered.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:20 AM
2

Oh no I completely understand, and trust me there's only so much you can polish a piece of shit. Style is far from the cut off, and there aren't clothes for your face.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:16 AM
0

God you just keep going with the strawmen.... They're just unsuccessful men. Not redpillers. And no, they're not getting laid because they're sexist assholes, enough of them fuck around no problem. It's not a cult, people learn about concepts regarding it unprompted and find solace nowhere else but there.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:15 AM
3

Yeah worded it wrong, not the dealbreaker, I mean for the deal to even take place. And women's cutoff for it is higher than mens.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:11 AM
0

An idiotic argument i didn't make, lmao. Listen, whoever it is you're arguing with, it's not me because you keep bringing up points I'm not. I get you have a deep resentment of men and think that those that don't have success must be deeply hateful in kind, but a majority don't. I do not need to prove it, the stats prove enough. Also sound argument for covid, lmao, not enough people are dying for it to matter, let's not take any precautions
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:05 AM
3

I mean, you can disagree, but both women and men value looks first and personality second, it's the cut off/the deal breaker regardless of gender. The difference is the intensity of the personality conveyed, for women, men more often have to take the lead, be the fun, adventurous guys, and for men most women have to like some of the things the guy likes and be nice to him, lmao. It's not that personality doesn't matter as much, it's that for men there's more leeway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 01:02 AM
0

And most people don't die of covid lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:53 AM
0

this was not the point of discussion but thanks for the advice i guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:49 AM
0

you have a higher risk of getting killed by your fridge than getting killed on your first date, sheesh, a marginal risk of dying as high as getting struck by a lightning bolt is not comparable to a very observable and understandably worrying trend of men giving up on society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:49 AM
0

When % of sexlesness (which of course also means no relationships) for women 18-29 are as high as men's are we can discuss how they're both as bad. Until then there's no point. I was mentioning it because women get to have their cake and eat it in terms of fun and stability, and later on expect men to bend over and provide for women who only value them for the ability to take care of their offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:39 AM
0

literally when did i say they men didn't value stability, lmao. you keep arguing things i'm not, it's stupid. i said men didn't have it easier dating. that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:36 AM
2

You're getting way out of line here inkwell, the point of the thread was do men or women have it harder dating and it's simple to deduce when you look at the stats. Wasn't arguing who works or doesn't, just where women's main priorities are when they grow older. They want stability, not fun, since most of them want children at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:31 AM
2

Yeah, women expect a fun guy young and a worker drone when they get older, back at square one, wasn't arguing otherwise. I get that you're a big fan of strawmen but try paying a little attention next time. Hallelujah.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:23 AM
2

XD your response to a majority of women not wanting a man that doesn't provide is "uhh but a minority don't so just try going through a bunch of first dates until you find the ones that do lmao", christ this is priceless
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:15 AM
1

66% of women prefer to have their first date paid for, what was that about not paying for women? And that's the case even when the woman makes more money than the man. Also we're talking in the context of relationships here, not life. Women can also provide for themselves so how come men have it better? Of course money is of personal benefit, wasn't arguing otherwise so cool it with the strawmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:10 AM
1

toodaloo pumpkin
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 11:25 PM
0

I get that you're mad and are pretending that what i said was some eureka moment that i spent a disproportionate amount of time thinking of, I'm just stating a simple observation from your ramblings. You describe yourself and your friends in a very similar way to those ugly guys going around telling people they have glowing personalities when they really don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 11:22 PM
1

If you and your friends are still alone in your 30s it's pretty clear to me that you have something in common with those ugly men you accuse of being pretend nice :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 11:12 PM
1

Wew, another strawman..im gonna make a whole thread about this "ugly men going for women more attractive than them", because sure as shit no woman exclaiming this has provided sources to prove it. Either way in the context i was talking about the the two men and woman were looksmatched, but way to paint your own narrative. And my comparison of pretending to be nice was to show that despite societies messaging niceness is not imperative to a successful relationship, and that any attempt at bring …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 10:58 PM
0

No one was proclaiming themselves "nice", so cool it with the strawmen. These men don't go up to people and say "b-but I'm a nice guy just give me a chance", they act like regular dudes. They're saying in comparison to these pieces of shit it's surprising they'd rather go for them. It's also weird how you assume that they pretend to be decent human beings? When as evidenced by the post that i gave you the people who were pieces of shit were successful, when you think even an attempt at pretendin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 10:35 PM
2

What an argument, men have it better because they get the opportunity to provide for women, hell of an advantage. "Value going up" lmao, what's actually happening is women are tired of the fun and are ready to settle with career oriented men to take care of their offspring, men's value isn't going up as lovers, but woker drones. Genuinely what mental gymnastics do you have to go through with stats from OLD (which is increasingly becoming the way most ppl 18 29 are dating so calling it irrelevant…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 10:27 PM
5

Here's a relevant post for you to read. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/cux0dm/discussion_research_finds_that_women_do_not/ Wether or not you want to believe it these trends hold merit in real life as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 10:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter