UpsetSleepyBear Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Thought you ladies would appreciate this. 50cent gets it 😂	LEVEL UP	UpsetSleepyBear	/r/FemaleDatingStrategy	17/01/20 04:43 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	(Follow up question in regard to earlier post on women with high N count) Should men wait as long as possible to enter a LTR/get married then? Sure, but again not enough research has been done on male age and fertility. The majority of the research has been on female paternal age. They’re starting to scratch the surface on male fertility and some doctor’s are beginning to say that it matters as much, if not more, as female age. The fact of the matter is- none of us get better as we age. We are all mortal. A woman is better off having a younger father get her pregnant (if all she cares about is the best sperm, and likewise for a male (i…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/20 01:31 PM
0	(Follow up question in regard to earlier post on women with high N count) Should men wait as long as possible to enter a LTR/get married then? A woman’s eggs aren’t entirely non functional as well. The chances to get pregnant decreases as you age, but not entirely impossible. Same goes for men. The chances of getting a woman pregnant decreases as you age, but not entirely impossible. Both eggs and sperm also have risks associated as the person ages.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/02/20 05:10 PM
-2	(Follow up question in regard to earlier post on women with high N count) Should men wait as long as possible to enter a LTR/get married then? Might want to do more research.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/02/20 04:49 PM
4	(Follow up question in regard to earlier post on women with high N count) Should men wait as long as possible to enter a LTR/get married then? Then explain why sperm banks have a cut off date? Also, you don’t know how they conceived. They could have frozen their sperm.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/02/20 03:10 PM
5	(Follow up question in regard to earlier post on women with high N count) Should men wait as long as possible to enter a LTR/get married then? I wonder why sperm banks stop taking men’s sperm as early as 34 then? Please don’t believe what PPD tells you about men’s fertility. You do not have all the time in the world.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/02/20 02:56 PM
5	A Lot of Young Women Find Men 20-40 Years Older Than Them Attractive Seems like a troll post.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 11:48 PM
7	A Lot of Young Women Find Men 20-40 Years Older Than Them Attractive As another redditor mentioned, what happened to women thinking you’re repulsive and should just die already 17 days ago?	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 11:46 PM
5	A Lot of Young Women Find Men 20-40 Years Older Than Them Attractive Damn...	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 11:31 PM
5	A Lot of Young Women Find Men 20-40 Years Older Than Them Attractive Pretty sure sugar babies/daddies is not a new concept. Most know that old men are an easy target. If they liked you for you, money would not need to be involved. And yes... getting pregnant by you would guarantee a check.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 11:28 PM
3	Sex robots will affect the dating Only 10-20% are getting laid now so I’m not sure what the difference will be. The men who can get real pussy most likely will continue doing so instead of using a bot.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 11:09 PM
3	Sex robots will affect the dating Those are only the ones that aren’t already getting laid. It won’t make a difference for women whether or not they’re fucking robots. We aren’t in harems now, no?	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 09:56 PM
3	Sex robots will affect the dating Probs not. There’s enough dick to go around.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 08:50 PM
3	Sex robots will affect the dating Problem solved	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 06:00 PM
3	Sex robots will affect the dating I’m assuming only men who can’t regularly get sex will be utilizing the bots. They’re men we’re already not fucking anyways, so no harm no foul.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 03:01 PM
1	Reasonably attrattive men in their early 30s with their sh*t together are better off casual dating than being in a LTR? I saw that after a little more research. Interesting!	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/02/20 01:29 PM
1	Reasonably attrattive men in their early 30s with their sh*t together are better off casual dating than being in a LTR? Again, obviously. I was being sarcastic.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/02/20 11:50 PM
2	Reasonably attrattive men in their early 30s with their sh*t together are better off casual dating than being in a LTR? Obviously. I’m stating that a sperm bank won’t accept your sperm but it is no longer deemed as safe after a certain age. Your sperm has an expiration date.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/02/20 11:40 PM
1	Reasonably attrattive men in their early 30s with their sh*t together are better off casual dating than being in a LTR? I wonder why sperm banks won’t take sperm from men over 39 then? As I mentioned above, some banks won’t even take sperm from a man over 35. We are all living by the same fertility clock.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/02/20 08:10 PM
15	Reasonably attrattive men in their early 30s with their sh*t together are better off casual dating than being in a LTR? I think that’s a bit too late. Sperm banks won’t even take your seed if you’re over 39, some even being 35 and up. Much too high of a risk.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/02/20 08:09 PM
14	Reasonably attrattive men in their early 30s with their sh*t together are better off casual dating than being in a LTR? So basically ride the pussy carousel until your SMV goes down you’re willing to “settle” for whomever you chose to be your LTR/wife? This sounds familiar.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/02/20 04:35 PM
6	So you want all the rewards without any of the effort or risk? Can’t wait for the replies on this one.	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/01/20 02:55 PM
2	CMV: When it comes to wanting to mate with multiple women, (just about) AMALT. If they could, they would, and when they can, they do. This is a great reply (and gave me some hope about the truth of human nature). Well written.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/20 03:06 PM
2	CMV: When searching for attraction, men should only date women who at least kiss them on their first sexualized/romantic meeting. Yes, I was replying to OP. Thank you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/20 02:34 PM
2	CMV: When searching for attraction, men should only date women who at least kiss them on their first sexualized/romantic meeting. Hm, I’ve never had a problem before and I wait. I don’t have anything by a timeline by any means, I just go by what feels right for me. I have gained commitment from every man I’ve gotten intimate with. And no, sexual attraction is almost never there immediately for me. Sure, a person can look good but I’m almost always attracted to the person they are more so than the outer shell, hence having to know someone first. With all the hate for single mothers on this sub, you would think men would app…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/20 01:30 PM
3	CMV: When searching for attraction, men should only date women who at least kiss them on their first sexualized/romantic meeting. This is not true. I become more sexual the more comfortable I am with someone. It takes some time for me to get to know someone and warm up.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/20 05:09 AM
3	CMV: When searching for attraction, men should only date women who at least kiss them on their first sexualized/romantic meeting. Couldn’t agree more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/01/20 11:03 PM
8	CMV: When searching for attraction, men should only date women who at least kiss them on their first sexualized/romantic meeting. I personally wouldn’t feel comfortable kissing on a first date. I really need to know a person before I can get sexual with them. I have zero sexual attraction to strangers. Sure, I can think someone is hot but I don’t find it appealing to kiss a stranger. Luckily I haven’t had to navigate through the dating world as my LTRs have all started as friendships. I would hate to be rushed into attraction. I need to know what kind of person they are/where their mind is at. Can’t do shallow interactions…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/01/20 09:04 PM
21	CMV: When searching for attraction, men should only date women who at least kiss them on their first sexualized/romantic meeting. Why must everything be rushed and timed? So many complaints about women riding the cock carousel, yet people can’t take the time to get to actually know each other before putting these “standards” on every single interaction they have. Can things happen naturally anymore or must everything be a comparison?	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/01/20 07:00 PM
1	Women want sex, men want relationships Are the men having orgies together in old homes or?? Since women lose their energy & all.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/01/20 03:44 PM
4	Q4BP : What do the studies that show lower partner counts for attractive or healthy weight women say about high partner count women? And conversely why overweight or less attractive women show higher partner counts? Oh, I see. My apologies.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/12/19 11:22 PM
5	Q4BP : What do the studies that show lower partner counts for attractive or healthy weight women say about high partner count women? And conversely why overweight or less attractive women show higher partner counts? Where did I disagree with that?	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/12/19 11:14 PM
33	Q4BP : What do the studies that show lower partner counts for attractive or healthy weight women say about high partner count women? And conversely why overweight or less attractive women show higher partner counts? My guess is that the lower weight women don’t have any issues getting a man to commit which means less time being single = lower n count.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/12/19 07:30 PM