TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Upstairs_Ear4172 Archive

View 1 posts and 854 comments by Upstairs_Ear4172 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

FeminismUpstairs_Ear4172/r/MensRights18/07/25 06:10 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Wow you have zero reading comprehension...
/r/MensRights11/05/26 07:09 AM
9

Simply talking to women?? It is not socially acceptable for ANYONE to follow a stranger around and continuously ask them personal questions despite them showing no interest. That’s concerning behaviour
/r/MensRights10/05/26 09:40 PM
2

That is a completely different story to what the person mentioned… they mentioned Argentina whereas that happened in Brazil. That story also doesn’t mention PhDs in psychology or feminism…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 02:00 PM
2

You should absolutely be critical of reddit posts that have provided no information. Being critical of any information is what motivates research. Information sourced from reddit should be diminished in comparison to peer reviewed research, scholars etc.... I would argue that it is bad faith to treat all sources of information as equally credible
/r/MensRights10/05/26 09:20 AM
1

This isnt a no true scotsman fallacy... I'm just asking for sources from OP regarding his claims
/r/MensRights10/05/26 09:12 AM
2

I tried googling that and nothing came up, can you link the news story? I think you're lying tbh, there isn't a phd in "critical feminist psychology", it would be a phd in psychology and their research would be based on critical feminist psychology, therefore making them critical psychologists and feminist scholars... You wouldn't know what their research was about unless you actually went through their publications and even then, you might not because not everyone publishes their PhD thesis
/r/MensRights10/05/26 09:10 AM
0

I’m not asking you to form an opinion based on any of my statements, I’m literally just asking questions regarding OPs claims. I’m asking you to question information on Reddit, to critically think about the sources of said information, if they could be considered reliable enough to form a legitimate opinion. A feminist scholar is someone who has a PhD, usually in critical feminist psychology.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 11:11 PM
-1

Have you heard it from an actual feminist scholar? Feminist author? A well known feminist creator? Or do you form your opinions on things based on rhetoric from anonymous accounts on social media?
/r/MensRights09/05/26 10:53 PM
1

I believe that identifying with a movement and being educated in a movement are two different things. The latter refers to feminist scholars who actively study and research societal inequalities through a critical feminist lens whereas the former are usually individuals that simply identify with the definition of feminism i.e men and women are equal. I think that when quoting feminist beliefs, your evidence should be from specific feminist organisations or feminist scholars. The comment you link…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 09:51 PM
1

Well no, someone could easily make bot accounts and raid mensrights, making it seem like many people in this sub have abhorrent views. Also, someone stating something anonymously online should never be taken as an absolute truth or as a representation of an entire movement. There's no proof of education, of identity... They could be anyone. Do you not have any examples of any actual feminists stating this? What evidence do you have for this claim? Can you link the post?
/r/MensRights09/05/26 09:28 PM
-11

Can you provide an example of an actual feminist, not an anonymous Reddit account, stating that men should just transition to avoid problems inherent to men? Potentially a scholar, feminist author, a well known feminist content creator etc. I ask because I’ve never heard of this before
/r/MensRights09/05/26 09:13 PM
2

You responded to me, genius
/r/MensRights08/05/26 09:58 AM
2

No idea what your point is, OP said he didn’t know any thriving trans men so I listed some
/r/MensRights08/05/26 09:26 AM
9

OP was also referring to long term relationships which is why he mentioned the potential need to expand his place and find an “adventurous girl” That’s why I mentioned partners
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:37 PM
11

But that isn’t true? The vast majority of men wouldn’t sacrifice their entire life for a woman in your situation…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:18 PM
1

Which is why I said actually look and research… just because you’ve never heard of them doesn’t mean they don’t exist. I can’t name any trans women in music yet I wouldn’t deny their existence Cavetown is incredibly influential and popular in the modern alternative music scene.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:17 PM
0

Noah Finnce? Miles Mckenna? Jamie Raines? Robin Skinner aka Cavetown? Jesse Sulli? There are MANY examples of ftm men thriving and doing amazing things. Maybe actually look rather than assuming
/r/MensRights07/05/26 09:07 PM
11

Then what was the point in this post? Obviously, people who live unconventional lifestyles will have more difficulty dating, whether said person is a man or woman…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 08:43 PM
54

You live a very unconventional life that the vast majority would find unappealing, especially if youre seeking a life partner. Most men and women wouldn't be willing to uproot their entire life to travel overseas and across the country for a potential partner, that is a huge decision. Would you be willing to give up your adventurous lifestyle for a woman? Would you move to a house and give up continuous travelling for a life partner? Most likely not. You have chosen an unconventional lifestyle s…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 08:08 PM
-2

Irrelevant? You said that a man with a record of such allegations would be cancelled yet the president of the US has dozens of allegations and it hasn’t impacted his career in the slightest
/r/MensRights15/04/26 09:18 AM
-1

Donald trump has dozens of sexual assault allegations. He’s the president.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 11:59 AM
0

Children develop and understand empathy at around 3-4, you’re just a tad behind
/r/MensRights30/03/26 03:25 PM
5

OP just learnt what empathy is…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 02:35 PM
1

Again, you're confusing escorts with prostitutes, they're completely different so not sure why you're using escort and hooker interchangeably when they're two different discussions. The vast majority of women work. Expecting your partner to be financially adept isn't the same as seeking a man to 'provide', it is wanting a partner that is financially literate, who is able to contribute to the household alongside your income. I'm not attacking you for your choice in paying for such services, you'r…
/r/MensRights29/03/26 02:27 PM
2

Definition of a sugar baby: 'someone who receives presents and money from a rich and usually older person in return for spending time with them and having a sexual relationship with them' Definition of an escort: 'an individual hired to accompany a client to social events or provide companionship for a fee, often operating privately rather than on the street. While not inherently illegal, many escorts provide sexual services in exchange for money, making them a form of prostitution that operates…
/r/MensRights29/03/26 01:58 PM
2

Because it’s an escort service…? Obviously it’s going to attract women who are in it for financial gains rather than an actual relationship. I think using such sites is a bad idea
/r/MensRights29/03/26 09:28 AM
1

Obviously, you’re going to see negative traits on sites such as seeking arrangements… it’s essentially an escort service
/r/MensRights29/03/26 12:46 AM
-10

What do you mean by marriage material? I’d argue that “marriage material” isn’t a specific list of traits that can be applied to each person but rather a subjective list that differs across individuals. For example, a man who enjoys travelling and who wants to travel with his future wife would consider an interest in different cultures, adventurous etc. as “marriage material” traits whereas a man who doesn’t enjoy such things wouldn’t consider said traits as marriage material 🤷
/r/MensRights28/03/26 07:48 PM
0

Wow you’re insanely sexist. Not all women want children, not all women want to get married and shocker, lesbians also exist
/r/MensRights21/03/26 11:28 PM
-1

Not all women want to be housewives and men CAN stay home and many do. Jesus, this isn’t the 50s anymore - you’re welcome to join us in the 21st century.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 10:23 PM
-9

It’s really odd and quite disgusting to be joyful at the idea of people you don’t even know losing their jobs.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 07:35 PM
1

You fundamentally misunderstand what the replication crisis is, just because a stud cannot be replicated, doesn’t make it fake. There are many factors at play, it isn’t as simplistic as replication crisis = fake “ideology fused” study, that’s an incredibly ignorant take. You seem to be in the mentality of believing anything you personally disagree with is inherently wrong. Also, medication is used to treat psychiatric disorders as well as group therapy… I’m going to stop interacting with you her…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:37 AM
1

The replication crisis is definitely a problem which is why I would always advise someone to read the methodology of a study, check the statistical power, the p value, check the journal it is published in and always be critical of studies you come across rather than reading a small part and running with your interpretation 🤷 There are many academics focused solely on replicating studies too so not sure where you have heard that academics don't care about this crisis, it is one of the first thing…
/r/MensRights17/03/26 12:43 PM
1

By definition, theories are a stepping stone to improvement, as we improve our understanding, we build upon previous theories. I personally disagree with Chomsky's statement as do many other academics but you are entitled to your beliefs.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 12:09 PM
1

I don’t “gobble down every theory”, theories are a stepping stone to improvement. I also find it ironic how you are stating that I am an anti intellectual for reading literature yet you referenced Chomsky in your other comment who also listens to academia and has developed many theories of his own… try and stay consistent.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 11:14 AM
1

I have corrected people dozens of times in this sub, it results in getting downvoted to hell and bombarded with comments refusing to understand. Correcting people is absolutely the best way forward in a space that is open to criticism and new information. This subreddit exists in an echo chamber, parroting the exact same talking points every day - anyone that strays from such views are met with hostility 🤷
/r/MensRights16/03/26 10:50 PM
0

What exactly do you want academics to do to stop individuals from misunderstanding a term and going online and spreading misinformation? They do a considerable amount in spreading knowledge through peer reviewed studies based on intersectionality, the issue is many people just read the abstract of a 5000+ word study and think they understand it. They parrot their incorrect interpretation on subreddits like this one which results in hundreds of upvotes and people taking it at face value - resulti…
/r/MensRights16/03/26 08:46 PM
-2

It isn't constantly applied incorrectly, you're just in spaces where it seems like it is constantly applied incorrectly. My Masters dissertation was based upon intersectionality and those who I interacted with in that academic space understood the term completely, it was never misused. When you're only communicating with strangers on social media and uneducated people, it will absolutely seem like most people don't understand basic definitions but I'm sure you wouldn't advocate for the eradicati…
/r/MensRights16/03/26 08:13 PM
-3

So, because some people use a term incorrectly, we should eradicate said term completely? Which is what OP is suggesting.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 06:55 PM
0

How is this getting upvoted? This is a complete misunderstanding of what intersectionality even means... Jesus, this sub is the epitome of anti intellectualism
/r/MensRights16/03/26 02:57 PM
-8

Name 3 movies since 2015 that follow the “plot” you stated. Should be easy if it’s “most”
/r/MensRights14/03/26 12:46 AM
-7

You're changing your original point, you originally stated that the article spoke about just releasing women and closing 12 prisons, this is false. I told you that it actually talks about rehabilitation programmes and you're now complaining about that. What you're referring to is "We do need more prison spaces, but those places should be filled with violent or prolific men, rather than women who are not." yet you purposefully ignored the other part which stated "Some women are violent, sexual or…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:48 PM
-1

Ironic that you’re calling me a bot when you’re refusing to admit that you’re wrong and sticking to the same narrative that is blatantly not true, just from reading the description of the documentary, kinda bot like. But fair, have a nice rest of ur day
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:06 PM
-5

Did you even read that article? It doesn't say that they want to close 'at least 12 prisons', the goal is to close one. It also doesn't say to just 'simply release women', it talks extensively about rehabilitation programmes, residential centres, women centres etc. Women didn't not go to university due to the same factors impacting working class men today, they didn't go because of systemic barriers that prevented them from attending i.e it was believed women were inherently less intelligent tha…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 10:53 PM
0

Or just read the Netflix description of the documentary... "With rare access and no holds barred, the acclaimed documentarian investigates a growing ultra-masculine network and its controversial influencers... The film unpacks the growing cultural influence of extremist influencers on young boys." it is literally about extremist influencers and the impact it has on young boys. That is a fact.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 09:40 PM
-31

I never said false accusations dont happen, of course they do. But to act like it is an epidemic and women are just lying left, right and centre about sexual assault is blatantly false.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 09:35 PM
-45

Couldn't it be argued that more women are going to university because expected career paths for women are typically in health and social care and education which all require a degree whereas expected careers for men involve trade which don't require a degree? Despite women being more likely to attend university and achieve higher grades, men are still outperforming women in prestigious institutions i.e Oxford and Cambridge. Therefore, couldn't we argue that it is a classist issue in which workin…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 07:16 PM
-111

How has equality for women become discrimination against men?
/r/MensRights12/03/26 06:08 PM
0

Because the documentary isn't about masculinity in general, it is about the cultural impact of extremist influencers and the misogynistic views they're perpetuating.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 06:06 PM
0

You can disagree but it is a fact that literature forms theoretical frameworks which are the basis to ideological movements and said core concepts are innate to feminism, whether an individual who identities as a feminist follows them or not. Just as the 10 commandments are innate to the bible, whether a Christian follows them or not. An individual isn’t a feminist if they don’t believe in the end goal being gender equality, that is also a fact whether you believe it or not. It is a fact that on…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 10:57 AM
1

I agree that the term toxic masculinity should be renamed since it does instinctively discourage men from learning. However, I also think men who dismiss it without doing any research are also part of the problem. It isn’t logical for any system to periodically reach out to every single man personally to encourage them to go to therapy. There are many ads, billboards, signs etc. that bring awareness to help that’s available, men are indirectly encouraged to reach out constantly.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:50 PM
1

I didn’t read most of the studies he cited because they’re 20+ years old, anyone with the most basic of knowledge can recognise that such sources are not legitimate forms of information to be applied to current day 🤷 I addressed everything else, if you choose to remain ignorant then that’s on you
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:45 PM
-2

Ok so this conversation is pointless then because you refuse to attend therapy yourself because you believe it isn’t scientific. Maybe don’t quote psychological literature to prove your point when you don’t even believe in the science yourself. I have literally proven you wrong each time in this thread and you have continuously moved the goal post. I’m done responding now
/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:54 PM
1

It has been through bringing awareness to toxic masculinity research which seeks to eradicate unfair expectations placed on men within society. Many countries have focused on dismantling gendered stereotypes within healthcare. For example, the UK is constantly talking about stigma surrounding healthcare amongst men - https://www.gatesheadhealth.nhs.uk/news/mens-health-breaking-the-stigma-of-masculine-identity-and-help-seeking/ The issue is, many men reject the idea of toxic masculinity because t…
/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:09 PM
-3

But your argument wasn't that gender bias exists within diagnostic criteria overall, your argument was that all DSM diagnostic criteria was developed using female samples and that men therefore face bias and suffer more. You're simply moving the goal post to appear right when your post and following comments did not discuss gender bias impacting both men and women but rather made out that only men face bias and therefore suffer. You're just wrong, the current DSM specifically focuses on capturin…
/r/MensRights06/03/26 06:56 PM
-6

Yeah, I have two degrees in psychology... the studies you have provided are completely out of date and would not be considered legitimate sources of information. The golden rule is to find studies that were written within the last 5 years, possibly 10 if it's quite a niche area. The first study you quoted is ridiculously outdated, in 1998, the DSM IV was used and since then, there have been 3 updated versions. There still exists some potential gender bias but it is not in favour of women or men,…
/r/MensRights06/03/26 03:49 PM
-10

So, you just made up two scenarios and got mad? Also, how often do you think people are getting diagnosed with bpd? Only 2-3% of the population is diagnosed, with 1.3% being men...
/r/MensRights06/03/26 02:54 PM
-7

Definition of toxic masculinity - "a set of attitudes and ways of behaving stereotypically associated with or expected of men, regarded as having a negative impact on men and on society as a whole." Toxic masculinity refers to the societal expectation that men shouldn't express emotions, should remain stoic, rejecting vulnerability etc. Obviously, telling men that they should 'man up', not go to therapy and to never be vulnerable DOES contribute to the male suicide rates and toxic masculinity li…
/r/MensRights06/03/26 11:39 AM
1

No, feminism draws from interdisciplinary research to understand gender inequality from multiple lenses and then it develops strategies to address inequality
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:58 AM
0

You're confusing feminist organisations with specific subsets of feminism, most feminist organisations fall under the overarching belief of gender inequality rather than focusing on specific subsets. Do you think that, maybe, you're struggling to find feminist organisations openly discussing male shelters because such organisations focus on women since they're charities for women? Just as you wont see cat rescues discussing problems that impact dogs because they aren't a dog rescue. Question, wh…
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:52 AM
-1

As I have said in previous comments, feminism is a movement that has multiple subsets I.e intersectional, liberal, radical etc. and they all have different ideas on how to achieve gender equality. Obviously, you’re not going to agree with every subset of feminism, I don’t either. I’m not sure why you have sent multiple links of things you disagree with since it is pointless to the discussion, my entire point here is that people simply disagree with how to reach a shared goal.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:39 AM
1

You’re referring to the people that identify as feminists rather than the actual ideology
/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:05 AM
1

When did I ever say it was beyond criticism?
/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:04 AM
9

Honestly, fancy restaurant first dates only seem to exist in films 🤷 in reality, most people do a low key first date. I’m 23 and I have never considered going to a restaurant for a first date, all my first dates have been at museums, cafes etc. and it’s the same with my friends.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 10:52 PM
0

If you said killing people is bad and then murdered someone, you never believed it was wrong in the first place - your “thought” is a lie in that scenario
/r/MensRights05/03/26 08:53 PM
-3

Action cant exist without ideas, ideas are the foundation to everything
/r/MensRights05/03/26 07:51 PM
1

You missed my point regarding Christianity, I was saying that ignoring the literature and focusing solely on those that identity with a group simply exposes you to lies and a twisted view of the original ideology 🤷 Your proposal doesn’t focus on feminism, it focuses on those that lack theoretical knowledge of the ideology, who twist and make up their own beliefs while identifying as a feminist. You’re welcome to do this but be aware that it has nothing to do with feminism, you’re just looking at…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 05:20 PM
0

Feminism is comprised of academic literature that conceptualises a theoretical framework that focuses on core concepts i.e gender inequality, patriarchy, socially constructed gender roles etc. which are comparable to 'tenants or rules'. The core concepts of feminism are overarching beliefs that are encompassed within different branches of feminism that lead to the same goal, gender equality. A specific person doesn't 'define' the theoretical framework or core concepts, such notions have develope…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 04:38 PM
0

Behaviour that contradicts the overarching belief of any ideology doesn't suddenly negate the beliefs of said movement, there's a clear distinction between an individual that identifies with an ideology and the ideology itself. For example, in the 1500s, many church leaders would claim that paying a sum of money towards the church would wipe people of their sins. Obviously, we know that there is no religious precedent for this in the bible but church leaders lied to illiterate people to extort m…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 04:14 PM
-2

There are different subsets of feminism i.e liberal, radical, intersectional etc. this doesn't make feminism as a whole a 'loose movement' but rather a theoretical framework that encompasses multiple subsets that are all based upon different academic literature and therefore have a strong basis of their own. Your comparison to religion that has 'clearly defined boundaries' also doesn't hold up. Much like feminism, many religions have different denominations within one centralised belief i.e chri…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 03:18 PM
-5

You're confusing the behaviour of people who identify as a feminist with the actual ideological movement. At its core, feminism is an ideological and theoretical framework that draws upon psychology, sociology and history to understand gender inequality within society. A feminist is someone who believes in this concept and/ or identifies as such. Obviously, not all feminists have studied copious amounts of feminist literature but this doesn't suddenly negate the research or reflect negatively on…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 02:47 PM
1

What are you talking about? All I said was that you shouldn’t agree to a date if you can’t afford to pay for yourself, that goes for both men and women. That’s not a wild opinion, pretty standard belief that people should live within their financial means.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 12:25 AM
1

No, people who are able to afford dating should date. If you only have spare income for a gym membership then why would you download a dating app that includes the expectation of going on dates that cost money? I don’t believe that men should always pay for the entire date but you have to at least be able to afford to pay for yourself.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 12:20 AM
0

If you cannot afford to date then don’t download dating apps
/r/MensRights28/02/26 10:52 AM
-1

The fact you’re attempting to insult my intelligence because I disagree with you over a woman’s dating prompts actually says a lot more about you. Again, if you don’t like people who have gift giving as their love language then don’t swipe on them. It’s quite simple. People are entitled to their preferences, receiving gifts is a legitimate love language that many people, male and female, have. I’m going to end this conversation here because you’re resorting to insults and seem quite incapable of…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:57 PM
-7

The prompt is asking what her love language is, it’s really weird that you have interpreted that as equalling expensive holidays and fancy restaurants… It could be as simple as receiving a small home made gift, you don’t know this woman. Do you typically do nice things for loved ones with the sole goal of receiving something in return? This is her love language within a relationship.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:47 PM
-1

You do realise the prompt is asking what her love language is? Receiving gifts is a standard love language for many people, google it. Quality time is a love language that does suggest mutual effort as it takes two people to spend quality time together and to make the effort. You might not personally like it and that’s fine, just don’t swipe on people like that.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:44 PM
-20

Right because a man siding with a woman obviously means he wants to hit. That’s honestly such a weird thing to say and just shows how you view women.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:30 PM
-23

Considering she put “quality time”, it suggests that she’s looking for mutual effort. When was the last time you went on a date? I usually assume that people who use the term “modern dating” have never been on a date because they have such twisted views that have no basis in reality.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:28 PM
-27

We don’t know this person and even if she is looking for a provider, who cares? Just don’t swipe if it’s not your thing…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:26 PM
-65

An individual looking for a partner seeks effort, gifts and quality time together? Yeah, that’s called dating and very normal standards to have No wonder you’re single if you believe this constitutes as discrimination, Jesus Christ
/r/MensRights27/02/26 10:52 PM
1

McDonald’s is a franchise, it’s the same everywhere
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:31 PM
3

They usually play music stations which pick music to play based on the top songs in the charts currently. It’s legit just mainstream pop music, there isn’t some anti man conspiracy
/r/MensRights09/02/26 02:06 PM
-5

That’s why I said to ask if they’re ok, genius.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 11:27 PM
-21

You don’t know these women, you’re assuming that they want to have sex despite being almost black out drunk and therefore unable to consent. Next time you see a man trying to take home an almost black out drunk woman, maybe step in and ask if she’s ok, you might prevent something terrible from happening.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 11:00 PM
1

This reads like you have never gone on a date with a woman tbh
/r/MensRights01/02/26 09:01 PM
2

For some reason your response has disappeared but thought id respond anyway. I suppose we both have a very different idea of what fun is, I would personally find it utterly depressing and lonely paying for a woman's company 🤷 On par with having to pay for alimony fees From my perspective, you went from a shitty divorce having to pay out a lot of money to resorting to paying women to pretend they like u (equally as depressing to me). Weird of you to repeatedly call me dense/ dumb in ur comment fo…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 06:53 PM
2

I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy in your statements 🤷 you cannot complain about the risk of losing money from a relationship/ divorce and then actively spend a considerable amount of money on women to pretend to like you
/r/MensRights30/01/26 06:22 PM
0

Mhmmmmm
/r/MensRights30/01/26 06:06 PM
-2

no idea what that is and it isn't pearl clutching to say that hiring prostitutes is lonely lmao
/r/MensRights30/01/26 05:34 PM
-1

So your wife pretended to love and you lost a lot of money in the divorce so as a result, you pay more women to pretend to love u and have also lost a lot of money from that... Makes sense
/r/MensRights30/01/26 05:06 PM
-2

Sounds depressing and lonely, u do u tho
/r/MensRights30/01/26 04:06 PM
-7

Only around 10% of divorces result in alimony payments which is only to address significant financial disparities between the partners earnings, also applying to the retirement thing u mentioned (3-10% of that percentage is women paying alimony to men) i.e when one partner stays home with the children and therefore doesn't have any work experience or a career to provide for themselves The parent that is the primary carer of the children usually keeps the house to make sure that the children's li…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 03:50 PM
-5

Kind of ironic that you have listed being fearful of losing money one way or another through a relationship yet also state that you 'sugar date', which is literally just women pretending to like you to receive your money/ gifts...
/r/MensRights30/01/26 02:05 PM
-10

What are the risks?
/r/MensRights30/01/26 12:25 PM
1

A huge part of anyone’s personality is how they treat another human, especially one that they claim to love. It is completely ridiculous to expect anyone, a woman or a man, to love someone without acknowledging how they treat others around them and how they make them feel. An individual could have the best personality but if they slam a door in your face rather than hold it and show a general disregard for your feelings, obviously said individual is going to be unlikeable. An individual who comp…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:21 PM
4

She doesn’t even identify as a feminist + provided sources for everything she said
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:35 PM
0

Like I have said multiple times in this thread, this is being directly addressed and spoken about because of the national emergency the UK is facing regarding violence against women and girls.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 12:31 PM
0

Yes, it’s called PSHE (relationships and sex ed)
/r/MensRights10/01/26 11:54 AM
0

Addressing violence perpetrated against women doesn’t take away from male victims of violence.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 10:50 AM
0

Men are also abused in relationships, yes. Addressing violence perpetrated against women doesn’t take away from male victims and the classes being implemented will benefit BOTH men and women into developing healthier relationships since the classes are simply teaching children how to navigate their feelings and that they should speak up if they’re uncomfortable with anything.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 12:18 AM
1

Girls do attend this class. This class has been implemented because there is a national emergency regarding violence against women and girls in the UK, a woman is murdered every four days by a partner or ex partner. Would you rather us ignore this?
/r/MensRights09/01/26 11:38 PM
-18

I have extensively with women, none of them thought I wanted to date them because I was simply pleasant towards them... If you seriously believe what you're saying then id advise you to turn the wifi off and talk to people in the real world
/r/MensRights09/01/26 11:13 PM
-22

Or, you know, treat women the same as you'd treat a man. Women are not children and shouldn't be treated as such, really odd take
/r/MensRights09/01/26 10:41 PM
-1

Toxic masculinity is literally just a term to reference harmful societal expectations that are placed on men, it isnt saying that masculinity itself is toxic. It is saying that traits pushed on men are toxic i.e expecting men to not show emotion.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 10:18 PM
1

I'm not against divorce, men and women should be able to divorce for whatever reason. I don't want or care for weddings, it was just an example 🤷 some people are into that type of thing and thats ok Really odd request, you seem to have some pent up anger against women
/r/MensRights09/01/26 08:32 PM
-2

I just explained how it falls into the category of toxic masculinity. You’re purposefully ignoring my explanation
/r/MensRights09/01/26 04:46 PM
0

Well, if you’ve never seen it then obviously it has never existed. Even though I just explained how. Anyway, this is amazing to teach to young children and you’re odd for being against it.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 04:26 PM
-7

It’s always been apart of it?? I just explained how. Through the notion that men should be reserved and not express their emotions I.e “man up”. This type of rhetoric directly encourages young boys to not show their emotions and discourages them from expressing how they’re feeling - directly linking to consent.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 04:20 PM
-11

Define toxic masculinity. It literally just refers to harmful societal expectations of men I.e not showing emotions. Teaching young children that it’s ok to express how they’re feeling and whether something makes them uncomfortable is so important
/r/MensRights09/01/26 04:13 PM
2

If a woman said there are absolutely no positives to marriage despite being married herself, I absolutely would question it and ask about her husband.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 03:06 PM
-13

Read the article before getting outraged over a title - “they are taught no emotional reaction is bad and to speak up about anything that makes them uncomfortable, including hugs”. That is incredibly important to teach young children.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 01:56 PM
1

That’s not true at all. You clearly have zero understanding of tax benefits relating to marriage and you have no interest in learning because that would threaten your views of marriage. Genuinely, have you ever spoken to a woman who isn’t a family member? That is so removed from reality, Jesus. Every first love doesn’t result in marriage because relationships aren’t black and white, people grow as they get older. I’m going to assume you’re either a child or an extremely socially isolated individ…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 11:40 PM
1

The tax benefits absolutely benefit both partners, they’re mutually beneficial but ok lmao I don’t particularly care about marriage but you are being disingenuous if you’re seriously telling me that most people treat marriage like a business contract and are not marrying their partners out of love I said a wedding, not social media posts. Both partners are at their wedding and both have designated seats for their loved ones to publicly show their love for their spouse. The fact you mentioned soc…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 11:23 PM
-14

Tax benefits I.e inheritance tax exemption, marriage allowance, capital gains tax etc. inheritance rights etc. Outside of legality though, isn’t it a positive feeling to know your partner is completely committed to you and wants to spend the rest of their life with you? Some people would say a wedding is also a positive, being able to publicly show your love for one another in such a setting 🤷
/r/MensRights08/01/26 11:06 PM
-2

Literally, amusing to read tho
/r/MensRights08/01/26 10:50 PM
-26

Fr, fair having some issues with marriage in the legal sense but to not be able to think of a single positive thing about your marriage? That’s just depressing. Many of the people commenting here seem to be very lonely and bitter
/r/MensRights08/01/26 10:45 PM
-45

I feel quite sorry for your partner
/r/MensRights08/01/26 09:38 PM
-14

This is an insanely delusional take that isn’t based in reality at all. If women are accusing you of sexual harassment when you approach them then MAYBE the way you’re approaching women is creepy and considered harassment?? Just a thought.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 04:34 PM
0

I’m not saying it was all like that or that you have to have a particular style to be gay. I’m simply saying it’s ironic you would use that time as an example of traditional masculinity and to act like flamboyancy didn’t exist
/r/MensRights04/01/26 11:01 AM
-2

It is a false equivalence to compare women discussing abortion (primarily done in the first 12 weeks) to the literal murder of little girls on a mass scale, like what we saw during Chinas one child policy. So no, it is not hypocritical. The post and comments are rage bait, if you look at the actual stats of abortion, none of that is happening like at all.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 12:53 AM
1

I promise you, the gay community now takes HEAVY inspo from 80s/ 90s fashion - those decades are practically known for being about authenticity and acceptance You had David Bowie, Elton John, Freddie Mercury etc. ruling that era coming out with iconic gay anthems and having a dramatic influence on the culture
/r/MensRights04/01/26 12:51 AM
-4

Over 90% of abortions are done in the first 12 weeks, with a substantial amount happening within the 6-9 week range. The most common time for a woman to find out the gender is around 20 weeks.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 12:29 AM
0

In many countries, it is already illegal to get an abortion solely due to the babies gender. These types of posts and comments are legit rage bait and the people in this sub fall for it every time. An abortion isn't a little thing, it is a significant medical procedure that is mentally taxing as well as causing intense physical symptoms - women are not just getting abortions for the fun of it.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 11:58 PM
-2

This is genuinely such an insecure take, there's nothing wrong with disliking a certain style or music but to call it 'bitch ass' and to act like it should stop existing because you personally don't like it is just ridiculous. I also find it ironic how you mention the 80s and 90s in reference to traditional masculinity. You mentioned Def Leppard in a previous comment, literally known for having a camp style. 80s and 90s style and fashion is known for being quite queer coded like come on, crop to…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:37 PM
1

So you made up scenarios and got angry. No one cares about what pronouns you use in ur book, there are many books targeted towards men, many targeted towards women and many that use neutral pronouns.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 11:17 AM
11

Huh?? Have you actually been contacting feminist organisations and asking their opinions or have you just made up these scenarios and got angry? Sounds like the latter
/r/MensRights30/12/25 11:35 PM
1

Its in basic terms because Myron Gaines has the vocabulary of a child ✌️
/r/MensRights30/12/25 03:03 PM
1

By myron Gaines? Lmao no thanks
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:29 AM
1

I have no idea why you're lying but your comments are full of inconsistencies 🤷 You cannot decide that you were misdiagnosed, that isnt how that works. A professional would have to go through your medical history, your mental health history, your current behaviour... it can take years for a professional to come to the conclusion that you were misdiagnosed, you cannot just decide one day that you don't have a condition you were diagnosed with. Cluster B diagnoses do exist on a spectrum but the sp…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 01:11 PM
2

If you don't care about the characters then why would you care about their story? For a book to be truly good, the character building has to spark a level of care and fascination - without that, you just end up with a series of events with no interest in what actually happens because of the lack of care towards the main characters. It sounds like you have the reading age of a child tbh
/r/MensRights28/12/25 01:02 PM
-4

That’s not true at all, some books are, sure 🤷 and some women enjoy that genre but 90%? That’s ridiculous
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:46 PM
1

One of my close friends had bpd yet she has now reached a point where she no longer meets the diagnostic requirements because of treatment 🤷 so that’s not true. She’s only 23 and has been in consistent therapy for around 4 years
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:33 PM
1

That’s not true, cluster b disorders are absolutely treatable. Also, addressing the root problem is just as important as helping those impacted. Treating the individual with the diagnosis helps to prevent future harm to others.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 11:47 AM
1

You’re blatantly lying… First you said you were misdiagnosed, you then said that a professional has not stated you were misdiagnosed but rather you figured it out yourself. Therefore, you still have the diagnosis and you weren’t misdiagnosed until a professional states you were. You then stated that your ex wife, mother and sister wouldn’t be included in the statistics for cluster b disorders, implying that they have been diagnosed. You have now stated that they don’t have a diagnosis but rather…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 11:45 AM
-4

Women statistically read more than men and are more likely to be avid readers in comparison. Obviously, the industry is going to be more tailored to women because of that
/r/MensRights27/12/25 11:41 AM
0

10-60% of people do not have cluster b disorders, that is genuinely ridiculous to say. Cluster B personality disorders are considered the rarest type of personality disorders. The disorder should not be stigmatised because that stops people from seeking a diagnosis and therefore treatment.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:16 AM
1

As I have said, no one outside of a professional is in a position to diagnose ANYONE with a cluster B disorder, it can take psychiatrists up to a year to diagnose someone and you think you just know? You don't. One of my best friends is a woman diagnosed with BPD. It's ok to educate people on cluster b symptoms. It is not ok to guess whether people have cluster b disorders and then to demonise people based on your guess.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:13 AM
-1

So you haven't been told by a professional you were misdiagnosed? You 'figured it out yourself'...? Right You didn't answer about your ex wife, mother or sister
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:11 AM
-21

It’s odd that you’re blaming “female health professionals” for misdiagnosing when I have just stated that these disorders are incredibly difficult to diagnose and they obviously corrected themselves if you were told it was a misdiagnosis. The odds that your ex wife, mother and sister all have a cluster b disorder are practically zero… have they actually been diagnosed? If so, they would have counted towards the statistics related to the disorders so not sure what your point is.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 01:16 PM
-29

I hate this demonisation of cluster b disorders, they affect around 1-4% of the population and are incredibly difficult to diagnose, often taking up to a year for psychologists and psychiatrists to accurately diagnosis an individual. Yet unqualified people actually think they can spot these types of disorders without even meeting a person because checks notes tattoos = bad? It’s ridiculous and further adding to the stigmatisation. Also important to note, 70-80% of people diagnosed with cluster b…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 12:32 PM
-5

OP did say that men are better authors because they're men. Do you think men have some type of biological advantage when it comes to writing? They don't. Women have just bene historically discouraged from writing Also your example is bizarre and just completely inaccurate...
/r/MensRights24/12/25 01:58 PM
-2

Not sure why you're getting so defensive, odd that you blatantly denied your own words until I literally quoted you lol There's a substantial amount of media about men hurting/ killing women...
/r/MensRights24/12/25 01:28 PM
4

"And the women defending this will call these books “satire”. Wow." - implying that they aren't satire and are books to be taken seriously...
/r/MensRights24/12/25 01:18 PM
-35

Offended? Literally just adding my perspective ✌️
/r/MensRights24/12/25 01:09 PM
-40

Have you read the books? Or are you just guessing based on the title? Are you advocating for crime books to no longer exist? Horror books shouldn't exist? Any book that involves the murder of character shouldn't exist? Do you see how your thought process is a slippery slope to mass censorship? It's fiction, you dont even know what the books are about, you've just read the title and assumed.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 12:47 PM
-6

Maybe explore why that might be the case, possibly because women were historically discouraged from being authors, having to publish books anonymously or under a male pen name. Despite this, the best selling book series, Harry Potter, is by a woman and a woman wrote Frankenstein and subsequently invented the science fiction genre. (also, it wasn't a direct quote, I just summarised what you meant)
/r/MensRights24/12/25 11:22 AM
-17

“It’s not sexist but men are just better authors than women”, that is sexist. Also, it’s a library. You do realise that you can request for a library to stock any book you’re interested in?
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:37 AM
-68

You think they are actual instruction manuals? They’re all fictional books. I have a book called “how to tell if your cat is plotting to kill you” - its not literal…
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:35 AM
8

Not a woman. You’re putting your sexual wants above your wife’s mental and physical health, that sounds like you don’t like her. I absolutely adore my girlfriend and I would never damage her mental and physical health for something as ridiculous as a condom
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:23 PM
5

It sounds like you hate your wife
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:46 PM
-2

Eating meat has more health risks than getting a tattoo
/r/MensRights22/12/25 11:38 AM
-3

If you go to a reputable tattoo artist who uses high quality ink, the risks are practically non existent outside of allergies and potential inflammation 🤷
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:34 AM
4

That’s not true at all
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:22 AM
-6

I don't think it matters either way, u have a choice, u don't have to follow any account... Just going off my experience on dating apps, ive always had positive interactions and I also met my gf from a dating app 🤷
/r/MensRights14/12/25 04:11 PM
-7

Manipulation and psychopathy? Really? How do you know the women aren't replying to other men from the app? They might have simply looked at a profile, realised there was no attraction and chose to not reply and thats ok. Just don't move from the dating app until you have actually matched with a woman, had a conversation with her and have mutually agreed to move to different platform...
/r/MensRights14/12/25 03:39 PM
1

It’s a date… you’re meant to be getting to know the person and allowing them to get to know u, kinda the whole point
/r/MensRights09/12/25 08:59 PM
1

But not the centre 😌
/r/MensRights08/12/25 03:32 PM
-6

I don’t understand why some men are so against providing for their own children to the point of bizarre mental gymnastics to justify financially abandoning them…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 03:24 PM
1

American finds out the US isn’t the centre of the universe
/r/MensRights08/12/25 03:18 PM
1

Believe it or not, innocent in court doesn’t always mean actually innocent. Just as being found guilty in court doesn’t always mean you’re guilty. “Beyond all reasonable doubt” is the key term here, human error has always existed in the legal system. It’s so ridiculous to me that people like you will cry about false accusations yet refuse to acknowledge the fact that guilty people ARE found innocent sometimes
/r/MensRights08/12/25 02:21 PM
1

Anything reported to police is included in crime stats…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 01:55 PM
-3

If you believe that not getting convicted for a crime = innocent then you are incredibly naive and lack basic knowledge regarding the justice system. I’m sure you believe that people can be falsely convicted, correct? People can also be falsely declared innocent. Russell bishop was declared (falsely) innocent of murdering two young girls and because of that, he attempted to murder another.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 09:34 AM
1

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60ed551c8fa8f50c6ef84fbc/end-to-end-rape-review-report-with-correction-slip.pdf It’s actually only 1.6%
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:30 AM
-6

… what I said is a fact
/r/MensRights08/12/25 12:43 AM
-9

Perpetrator stats are not based off of assuming the general population have all committed the crime… they’re based on official crime statistics, academia, interviewing victims etc.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 12:23 AM
2

Are you stupid or just ignorant? Victims of SA are over 10x more likely to attempt suicide compared to those who haven't experienced SA.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 10:35 AM
-4

Now imagine that anxiety accompanied with physical pain and injury (around half of victims are also physically beaten), STDs (around 40% of victims end up with at least one STD), potential pregnancy and if you're in a country that doesn't have abortion laws, you have to keep it... I could go on. It is insulting and disgusting for you to say that a false accusation is equal to rape.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 04:13 PM
1

The 'boss babe' comment completely gave it away, that term is more commonly used now by red pilled platforms who use it in a condescending tone towards women 🤷 The fact they're claiming to be a law grad but, judging from this post and their replies, are incapable of stringing a coherent thought together, they have an abysmal knowledge in basic punctuation and type in a stream of consciousness... Yet people are eating this post up? Its honestly ridiculous
/r/MensRights02/12/25 06:38 PM
0

You absolutely are generalising all women in your post, 'The boss babe path didn't fulfill me or make me happy, as is the case for the majority of women' and 'Women aren't suited for intensely high-pressure environments', they're direct generalisations from you. Feminism has always advocated for women to have choice, to be able to go into any career path... The traditional path i.e SAHM, isn't demonised, but women are advised to be careful in such a position because of the inherent risks in comp…
/r/MensRights02/12/25 06:32 PM
-1

“Boss babe” is a term that has been hijacked by more redpilled spaces, used to insult women in a condescending way. The term is rarely used by actual women to describe themselves and it’s been that way since around 2016/17. The way you have taken “your” experience and projected it onto women as a whole demonstrates that you were never truly a feminist, if you were then you would recognise that women are individual beings and cannot be generalised as you are doing. I would expect someone who clai…
/r/MensRights02/12/25 05:34 PM
-4

I totally agree, one key point is the draft, I am totally for the abolishment of it and I agree with many of the points raised on this topic within this sub. But they tend to paint feminists as the ultimate enemy, completely ignoring the fact that there ARE feminists groups in Russia helping to hide men from the draft 🤷
/r/MensRights02/12/25 09:29 AM
-8

Exactly, the amount of times I’ve seen men on this sub advocate for not allowing women to vote… And they wonder why they’re painted as a misogynistic community. I’d advise you to read men who hate women by Laura bates, she does a deep dive into this subreddit and into other manosphere spaces, it’s truly fascinating as it is horrifying
/r/MensRights02/12/25 08:43 AM
-21

This is 100% a fake post written by a man and everyone on this sub is eating it up 💀 “The boss babe path”, the whole part about how women aren’t suited for high pace environments and how the majority of women just want a family + the inability to use paragraphs, incorrect punctuation and a general lack of flow to the text… Yet we’re meant to believe this is written by a grad law student? Lol
/r/MensRights02/12/25 08:22 AM
5

This reads as such a fake post, most likely by a man
/r/MensRights02/12/25 08:03 AM
1

Ah yes, my “fake degrees” in psychology… after checking out your profile, you have referenced psychological studies many times and you have spoken extensively about gendered issues which is a psychological topic 🤷
/r/MensRights30/11/25 11:01 PM
0

Pfft you sound bitter
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:53 PM
-2

You think that definition is esoteric..? Read more books.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:46 PM
-6

That's quite condescending to say to someone with a differing opinion. I have asked you direct questions twice which you have avoided answering, suggests that youre just parroting the same misinformed view as everyone else in this sub
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:13 PM
-33

Were talking about a cartoon about a pig family my friend, there are positive portrayals of both boys and girls in that show
/r/MensRights30/11/25 09:48 PM
-6

Cambridge dictionary defines girl power as 'the idea that women and girls should be confident, make decisions, and achieve things independently of men' Why wouldn't that be present in a tv show about a little girl?
/r/MensRights30/11/25 09:38 PM
-57

There's nothing wrong with a positive portrayal of boys...? There's nothing wrong with a positive portrayal of white kids...? What's your point
/r/MensRights30/11/25 09:13 PM
-17

I haven't seen the movie, my comment was simply referring to your mention of girl power which has nothing to do with the dad 🤷 There's nothing wrong with having a positive portray of girls
/r/MensRights30/11/25 08:28 PM
-82

I mean, it is called Peppa pig, the main character being a little girl... Obviously, the show is going to show "girl power" as a positive portrayal of girls. What's the problem with that?
/r/MensRights30/11/25 08:08 PM
1

Reading comprehension is dead. The first line isn't calling false accusations a myth, it is referencing rape myths which refers to false beliefs about sexual assault i.e that false allegations are extremely prevalent and women lie all the time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_myth The researchers did not just assume the police believe accusations are false because of their sexism, the methodology states that the police were interviewed and said interviews were then analysed for reoccurring th…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 01:29 PM
0

You’re essentially advocating for the exploitation of women from poorer countries… not only would this INCREASE trafficking by coercing women to “richer countries”, it also promotes the idea that a woman’s body is a commodity that can traded from country to country and purchased. It would NOT reduce sexual violence either, this type of crime isn’t committed because men aren’t having sex. This idea places the blame on women which is abhorrent
/r/MensRights27/11/25 11:56 PM
1

Your response calling me a troll got deleted by reddit but I thought I'd just address it anyway, everything I have said is the truth. If anything, this post falls more in line with the definition of trolling since it is presenting misinformation to get a reaction and/ or create drama. On your comment regarding my 'psych nonsense', I have two degrees in psychology and am currently working on my PhD application - everything I have said is grounded in up to date psychological research.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 09:29 PM
2

It is not a police officer job to dismiss a report because they have a 'gut feeling' that it's false, it is their job to look at the evidence. This study demonstrates that the police officers attitude is not based on evidence but rather the implicit belief that women are deceitful and therefore lying.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 05:33 PM
2

The study isn't about what law enforcement has found, it is about the perceptions of police officers and how said perceptions aren't based on evidence but rather a 'gut feeling'. The study goes into detail about how the prevalence of police officers assuming a victim is lying is causing such a low report to conviction rate (less than 1%) and how it stops victims from approaching police officers. I would not trust any meta analysis conducted by you because you seem to have an inability in underst…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 05:05 PM
1

Ok so you don't understand it at all 🤷
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:13 PM
1

You didn't define it. Implicit bias just refers to the subconscious favouring of a specific group of people based on stereotypes associated with said group. For example, someone may have implicit bias towards white people because they implicitly associate POC with negative stereotypes and therefore subconsciously select more white individuals for a job interview. Are you saying racism doesn't exist at a subconscious level? Because that is what you're stating when you say implicit bias isn't a re…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:02 PM
-13

Because anything you disagree with or don't understand is nonsense, right? Define implicit bias in your own words.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 03:40 PM
2

And this study explains why police believe women are lying and therefore why the report to conviction rates are so low. It is ridiculous to cherry pick a study, you have found information you like and ignored the explanation and implications for such beliefs.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 03:29 PM
-22

Actually this study DOES align with attitudes that reinforce gender inequality, its the whole point of the study.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 02:45 PM
-4

The front line who just knows in their gut what’s a lie and what isn’t, without considering the evidence? The front line that has an implicit belief that all women are deceitful?? Are you really using that as evidence? Do you think police should dismiss a victim because “they just know they’re lying”? Do you really think that’s an appropriate way for police to deal with crime?
/r/MensRights27/11/25 02:29 PM
-37

You did not read that paper and, if you did, you completely misunderstood it. The paper is about how police officers perceive allegations and how they respond to such reports, highlighting why victims don't feel comfortable coming forward and why so many cases never face prosecution (less than 1% of cases reported to the police result in a conviction) It talks about how police officers PERCEPTION of accusations being false ranges from 5-90%. It was found that police officers that perceived false…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 02:10 PM
-4

Calling women "nonsensical" and "illogical" and that they should be put in their place is misogyny. It is ironic that you are talking about confronting reality when you are living in a fantasy world that relies on the subjugation of women to give yourself a false sense of superiority.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 12:36 PM
-7

The fact this comment is upvoted shows how misogynistic this sub really is.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 12:10 PM
-13

Mia Khalifa was exploited by the industry, she was an adult actress for just 3 months and only made a handful of videos yet now? There are thousands of her because production companies continuously upload her content, changing it slightly, without her consent. She has stated that she was pressured to do multiple scenes and she barely made any money, despite still being one of the most well known and popular actresses on those sites. She wants to remove those videos because it was exploitation an…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 10:33 AM
1

I had a quick google of the charity, you are either lying or completely misinformed. I read the 2020 annual report - "In 2020 we supported 1951 women, men and LGBTQ people" They're actively supporting MEN who are victims yet you're lying and saying that they actively promote the idea that men cannot be victims. https://diotima.org.gr/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/annual-report-2020_EN.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com Why are you spreading false information about a charity that is trying to help victims o…
/r/MensRights25/11/25 11:33 AM
1

After reading this response, it is so clear to me that you are not interested in learning about ANYTHING outside of your worldview. I have told you several times that the Duluth Model is outdated and is no longer used to dictate who can be victims or perpetrators, it has been replaced by a gender neutral model that acknowledges all victims of domestic violence. You are still perpetuating this narrative that the Duluth Model is still being used in this way even though it is a 50 year old outdated…
/r/MensRights25/11/25 10:59 AM
-1

Strong and defined gender roles IS inequality for both men and women.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 10:21 AM
1

Again, it’s a woman’s charity… why would a woman’s charity talk about male victims? That’s like complaining about a cat rescue charity not talking about dogs that suffer… obviously the cat charity isn’t going to use resources to talk about dogs. Are you saying that domestic violence support for women shouldn’t be advertised at all in case a man is falsely accused?
/r/MensRights25/11/25 09:46 AM
-8

Countries with the highest quality of living correspond with the countries with the most gender equality. You’re just misogynistic
/r/MensRights25/11/25 09:14 AM
0

I never made the argument that male lions are useless, they aren’t.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 08:03 AM
1

How have I enforced gender roles in this conversation?
/r/MensRights25/11/25 08:02 AM
-10

You do realise that it is an ad to bring awareness to women who are victims through a woman's charity that Toyota is supporting, right? Also, it's an advertisement... they're usually a minute long and don't have time to go into depth regarding the nuances of domestic violence. They're supporting one charity so have made an advert that represents said charity. The ad absolutely does not imply that only women are victims... a woman is a victim in the ad because it is promoting a woman's charity. I…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 09:43 PM
-12

In what way is it tone deaf or promoting a flawed narrative? It is displaying a very real scenario of domestic violence and having to escape a situation, it is promoting a womens charity that specifically focuses on domestic violence and is donating to said charity.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 09:23 PM
-4

The name of the charity is literally at the end.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 09:00 PM
-19

Are you seriously angry over this ad? It's promoting Toyota while simultaneously raising awareness for violence against women because Toyota is financially supporting a woman's charity that is focused on preventing and supporting victims of domestic violence. This ad raises awareness for both the brand and the charity...
/r/MensRights24/11/25 07:23 PM
-1

Your anecdotal experience does not change statistical data. The majority of men and women marry within their socioeconomic status. For example, I have a masters degree and so does my girlfriend, we are also both from a middle class family and are both working towards a PhD. Neither of us have dated up or down. Relationships are not solely based on attraction, the foundation of a relationship relies on shared values, on shared experiences, having things in common etc. if you don’t care about thes…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 09:36 AM
-1

Men rarely date down too, statistically, people marry within their socioeconomic status. This is due to a multitude of factors I.e similar life experiences, similar values, meeting at work or university etc.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 09:27 AM
-2

The ironic thing is that this person is projecting their world view onto just about anything, perpetuating misinformation about lions to do so 🤷
/r/MensRights24/11/25 08:54 AM
0

We should be dismantling gender roles, not enforcing them
/r/MensRights24/11/25 08:49 AM
-1

Just correcting your complete lack of knowledge regarding lions mate 🫡 Have a nice night
/r/MensRights23/11/25 11:44 PM
0

No one has ever denied that male lions can’t survive without female lions… it is common knowledge that male lions leave the pride and survive on their own after a certain age until they’re able to find another pride Not sure why you felt the need to mention lions physical strength lol no one has denied that male lions are bigger than female lions…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 11:37 PM
1

Not sure what point you’re trying to make, lions without a pack have a significantly shorter life span than those in a pack since they’re pack animals… There are packs, called coalitions, of just male lions, just as there are packs of just female lions Maybe stop trying to project your world view onto lions?
/r/MensRights23/11/25 11:26 PM
-5

https://lionrecoveryfund.org/lionesses-the-key-to-the-prides-survival/ You’re wrong, they’re matriarchal.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 11:11 PM
-9

This is such a ridiculous comment. What you’re saying about lions simply isn’t true, lionesses are the primary hunters within a pack and many prides survive without a male lion for extended periods of time. Lions are a matriarchal species as are hyenas. It’s ironic that you are complaining about “feminists projecting their views onto lions” when you’re doing the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 11:05 PM
1

Men and women do have intrinsic worth and value. The foundation of societies morality relies on this fact which is why murder is illegal, harming another person is illegal etc.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 10:30 PM
2

Because what you have listed are the only options in life, obviously We have this thing called free will, you don’t have to be miserable and forcing yourself to eat McDonald’s 🤷
/r/MensRights23/11/25 07:03 PM
-2

Andrew Wilson cannot even be classed as a debater, he reacts emotionally and resorts to insults and interruption when he dislikes what someone is saying. He cannot argue for his world view and relies on his brainwashed audience to not question him, buy his courses and watch his content. It’s embarrassing really.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 09:37 AM
-3

…media literacy is dead
/r/MensRights19/11/25 10:18 PM
2

You seem to be misunderstanding my point, I’m not saying that we should change how people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. I am simply saying that human error exists within the legal system which results in mistakes. I am simply acknowledging said mistakes
/r/MensRights19/11/25 05:45 PM
3

In the legal sense, you are correct. But the legal system isn't perfect, people get convicted when they're innocent just as guilty people aren't convicted.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 05:13 PM
-10

Watch the series again, she did not bully Jamie. Jamie and other classmates actually bullied her, sent private images of her around and Jamie asked her out when she was upset because he thought she was vulnerable and would therefore agree. She reacted to this by calling him a name on insta which gained attention from other classmates who did bully Jamie. Even if she did bully him, she is not "just as much part of the problem as he is"... he murdered her for rejecting him publicly. Way to miss th…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:25 PM
1

Your brain is porn rotted if you see a woman wearing a basic outfit in public as “soft porn”
/r/MensRights18/11/25 10:49 PM
1

What are you talking about?? I didn’t mean you literally don’t want women to exist, I meant that women should be allowed to exist in their bodies without worrying about some creep staring at them.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 10:40 PM
1

It’s really odd that you have reached that conclusion from me saying that women should be allowed to exist in their bodies
/r/MensRights18/11/25 10:16 PM
1

You essentially want to criminalise a woman existing in her body, women do not control a mans sex drive and they are not responsible for it. The two scenarios you have painted are not comparable, assault is a criminal offence for both genders. A woman existing? That is not a crime and it shouldn't be considered one.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 09:52 PM
1

It is illegal for men and women to assault anyone, regardless of gender. The human body is completely natural, women should be allowed to wear whatever they choose without having to worry about how a man will react. Hetero women are attracted to men yet you're not referencing shirtless men in public.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 08:50 PM
1

I'm absolutely not dismissing the lived experiences of any men, I am dismissing the premise that 'a large majority' of women have these specific standards i.e 6ft, "chad" etc. Do some women have said standards? Absolutely, is it the majority though? No, not even close. By perpetuating the notion that the majority of women do have such ridiculous standards, it absolutely isolates and hurts men. Your claim that women who date men who don't meet said standards treat it as 'dating down' or 'charity …
/r/MensRights16/11/25 10:05 PM
-1

I’m being absolutely genuine
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:11 PM
-2

I'd argue that people who perpetuate this belief are causing irreparable harm to young men and isolating them from not just women but society as a whole. It is absolutely not true that the majority of women only go for 6ft tall "chads", that is so far removed from reality. Step outside and tell me what the average couple looks like, you're going to see people of similar ages, similar socioeconomic status and average heights.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:04 PM
-15

I hope you don’t actually believe this, it is truly ridiculous
/r/MensRights16/11/25 01:03 PM
1

Obviously that’s a completely different scenario to what I was talking about 🤷
/r/MensRights16/11/25 11:04 AM
-2

You’re sending essays arguing with me over things I never said, not sure how to respond to this - you’re essentially arguing with yourself 🤷 My point is that asking for a DNA test is accusing your partner of potentially cheating and said partner will be upset over that and you agree with me regarding that point…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 01:34 AM
1

I'm not, thats why I said originally, 'Not sure about the post you are referring to'. I obviously cant say anything regarding the post because I havent read it
/r/MensRights16/11/25 01:01 AM
1

Op is literally using the term incorrectly, they aren't stating that the post they read fundamentally misunderstood what systemic violence is but instead, they're arguing that men do not fit the definition that was used in the post - there's a difference. I actually havent commented in this sub for over a week 🤷 I don't hate to agree, youre just trying to argue with me for no actual reason. Once you realised I was right regarding the definition of systemic violence, you changed your argument to …
/r/MensRights16/11/25 12:49 AM
0

I didn't agree with OP, my original comment is correcting OP because they have completely misused the term systematic violence - it doesn't mean literal violence. It seems like you don't understand the term either, I provided you with one of the most widely accepted and used examples of systematic violence and yet you still seem to be struggling.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 12:09 AM
-8

I haven't touched on any of that because it has nothing to do with my original point, my point was simply that asking for a DNA test is accusing your partner of cheating and said partner would be, rightfully, upset at such an accusation.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 12:04 AM
0

As I previously said, systemic violence doesn't refer to literal violence committed by men or women, it refers to harm caused through societal structures and institutions that may harm people by preventing them from meeting their basic needs. An example of systematic violence would be laws in place that marginalise a specific group i.e antisemitic laws in Germany during ww2.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 12:00 AM
-1

But it’s not? I literally provided an example in which it is used that has nothing to do with men
/r/MensRights15/11/25 11:47 PM
-10

If my partner accused me of cheating when I didn't, I would also get upset, that is a normal reaction to such an accusation. If you're in a committed long term relationship and you ask your partner for a DNA test, that is the equivalent of accusing them of cheating and they, rightly, will get upset over that. That doesn't mean they have something to hide or that they have cheated, it means that they're upset that their partner believes they have cheated on them.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 10:11 PM
-19

I think the difference in those two scenarios are the underlying implications, if my partner chose to get a diamond ring tested, would that say anything about me as a partner? No, the implication is that there are different ways to source a diamond and, in this scenario, my partner cares about that. Regarding DNA tests, if I was in a long term committed relationship and had children with my partner and I asked for a DNA test, the implication is that she cheated on me and by going through with a …
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:47 PM
4

Not sure about the post you are referring to but systemic violence doesn't refer to individual violent acts committed by anyone, it just refers to harm that is caused through societal structures and institutions i.e a social institution that may harm people by preventing them from meeting their basic needs. It doesn't refer to literal violent acts 🤷
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:30 PM
-1

Obviously but my point is that just because someone is found not guilty, that doesnt mean that they didn't commit the crime... just as if someone is found guilty, it doesnt mean that they committed the crime... false imprisonment is a thing as is guilty individuals being found innocent.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 06:59 PM
-4

They are rare. People in this sub seem to believe that a not guilty verdict = false allegation, a misidentification = false allegation etc. That isn't the case legally, a false allegation in a legal sense refers to a false allegation knowingly made by the accuser, it is not a false allegation if the defendant is simply found not guilty or if the accuser was not aware that they had accused the wrong person i.e misidentification.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 04:55 PM
-3

because being found not guilty doesnt equate to a false allegation, it simply means that the prosecution wasn't able to prove a defendant had committed a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. A not guilty verdict does not necessarily mean the defendant is innocent, just as a guilty verdict doesnt necessarily mean the defendant committed the crime. Human error exists within the count system and we have to acknowledge nuances, it would be ridiculous to state that every not guilty verdict means that the…
/r/MensRights15/11/25 04:47 PM
1

who knows 💀
/r/MensRights02/11/25 03:09 PM
-29

Literally all your posts are about taking advantage of women in poorer countries and you unironically use the term “chad”… found the incel
/r/MensRights01/11/25 11:46 AM
-27

Your comment history is insane
/r/MensRights01/11/25 11:40 AM
0

“Yes, im in an echo chamber BUT they are too!!!” Not the argument you think it is
/r/MensRights25/10/25 01:10 PM
0

I didn't make the sign, I am not the person in the picture. I cannot tell you their line of thinking.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:41 AM
0

The fact you stated your opinion and ended it with 'end of discussion' demonstrates that you aren't interested in learning new information to counter your opinion, enjoy your echo chamber ✌️
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:41 AM
-1

Because you base your opinion on feminists from posts like these, that completely misrepresent what feminists are saying and blatantly lie. You base your opinion on what you see on the internet and take it as the gospel truth, youre in an echo chamber 🤷
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:38 AM
-1

Way to prove youre just completely ignorant when it comes to the history of feminism and feminism in general ✌️
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:36 AM
-4

My point was the sign was 100% not inciting violence against men, which it isnt. Everything else is irrelevant to what I said
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:35 AM
-26

Feminism is a broad ideology that encompasses multiple branches that consist of a wide range of views. For example, radical feminists argue that transwomen are not women and are not included in feminism whereas intersectional feminism absolutely recognises transwomen and includes them. It is ridiculously misinformed to state that because some feminists believe something then all feminists must believe the same thing, that isn't how it works at all.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 02:12 PM
-40

I did mention contextually to defer the meaning, it was from the protests stemming from the Gisele Pelicot case which is why it is based on the legal system, the person dressed as a judge and the reference to evil. I'm sure we can all agree that the men involved in that case absolutely committed evil acts so the sign completely makes sense when adding the necessary context
/r/MensRights24/10/25 02:06 PM
-14

The sign says it all: FIRE Because who cares about the actual translation or context, right? Scary fire
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:49 PM
-67

The sign doesn't say anything about violence towards men, it directly translates to "the justice of the male" or "male justice" which, contextually, literally just refers to a male biased system of justice and is meant to highlight gender inequality in the legal system which is why the individual is dressed as a judge.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:38 PM
1

t's quite a common occurrence in this subreddit - they refuse to understand anything that goes against their beliefs and are quick to dismiss psychology as "not a real science" yet will send psychological studies when they perceive it as agreeing with them 🤷 Ironically, they completely misunderstand the studies and end up sending things that actually disagree with them - I have seen this many many times.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 10:14 AM
0

Not sure what your point was with that link, it doesn't change the fact that both robberies were a result of inadequate security and the stark gendered difference in reactions to the 1998 head of security and the 2025 head of security
/r/MensRights23/10/25 03:28 PM
-3

That literally isn't true, the security failings during the 1998 robbery directly resulted in the crime and were a benchmark for later criticisms of museum security in France and internationally. This is due to the outdated equipment they were using and the inadequate surveillance coverage. The head of security at that time was dismissed after the robbery due to his failings, you're either lying to make out that the reaction to the 2025 robbery and head of security isn't blatant sexism or you're…
/r/MensRights23/10/25 03:22 PM
-1

As I have stated, I’m not directly comparing the robberies but rather the reaction towards the security after both of said robberies. Men were not blamed as a whole for the 1998 robbery, people were not saying that men should not be in leadership positions and said robbery is a direct result of a man being head of security. Yet in 2025, people are absolutely blaming women and stating that they shouldn’t be in leadership positions and the robbery was due to the gender of the head of security.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 02:52 PM
-4

I wasn’t comparing the technology of the times, I was comparing the reaction towards the head of security in both instances. In 1998, men as a whole were not blamed for the Louvre robbery due to a man being the head of security at that time. Whereas in 2025, people are absolutely blaming women as a whole for said robbery, stating that women should not be in leadership positions and that the head of security was a “diversity hire”. If you cannot see the stark difference in reactions then 🤷 open y…
/r/MensRights23/10/25 02:30 PM
-21

There is literally not enough data available publicly to conclude that. She might have absolutely been unqualified but you're assuming that with not enough evidence + blaming it on her gender... Regarding my original comment, the Louvre was also robbed in 1998, the head of security was a man - does that mean that his gender is to blame for what happened? No, that is a ridiculous conclusion to make, no one would argue that men shouldn't be in leadership positions based on one person yet the artic…
/r/MensRights23/10/25 11:50 AM
-9

You do realise that there is absolutely no proof that she was a diversity hire in that article or that the fact she is a woman is to blame? It is all pure assumption based on her gender...
/r/MensRights23/10/25 11:26 AM
-38

How do you know she was unqualified? There absolutely were security failings which led to the incident but there is absolutely no credible evidence that demonstrates she was unqualified - only media commentary stating she was a 'diversity hire' with absolutely no basis for that claim. The fact she's a woman does not equate to her being a diversity hire or unqualified, that is a sexist assumption.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 11:23 AM
-57

The Louvre was also robbed in 1998, the head of security was a man. Does this mean that men aren't deserving of being head of security? They obviously aren't capable if one place got robbed under a mans watch, right? Same logic. Almost like it isn't about gender, the article is just plain sexist.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 11:17 AM
3

I haven't watched the series but from what you're saying, I will definitely be giving it a miss
/r/MensRights22/10/25 03:25 PM
-7

I haven't watched the series you're referring to but isn't Batman supposed to be quite a tortured individual stemming from his parent's murder, his traumatic experience with bats etc? His whole character is based on said "emotional hang ups" that eventually inspire him to make a difference in Gotham, to bring justice to people since he never got justice for his parents. His actions are literally driven by trauma and anger and always have been. Also, Batman getting defeated frequently is importan…
/r/MensRights22/10/25 01:55 PM
-3

That isnt true actually, lax is defined as not being sufficiently strict or careful and implies a lack of control. Whereas expanding a definition based on our increased understanding of abuse is actually the opposite, it is being more careful and invokes more control when referring to abuse in a legal sense
/r/MensRights22/10/25 12:12 PM
2

You are a prime example of the rise of anti intellectualism, goodbye
/r/MensRights22/10/25 11:14 AM
2

Where did I ever use incomprehensible esoteric language? My comment was extremely basic, the most technical word I used was 'psychological' and that is not incomprehensible esoteric language...
/r/MensRights22/10/25 10:34 AM
3

If that was too much for you then maybe read more, it's good for you brain ✌️
/r/MensRights22/10/25 10:22 AM
-3

The definitions aren't getting more 'lax', they're expanding as we increase our understanding of the different types of abuse. There isn't an 'over demand to be suffering from trauma and abuse', as our definition of abuse expands, so does our knowledge on the psychological impact of such trauma
/r/MensRights22/10/25 09:41 AM
-4

Where did you get the 1-5% for abuse? That isn’t right at all, 1 in 5 people experience abuse (20%), 1 in 4 women and 1 in 6/7 men https://www.ncdv.org.uk/domestic-abuse-statistics-uk/ That is significantly more than 1-5%
/r/MensRights22/10/25 07:21 AM
-9

This may come as a shocker but the two feminists you have met do not represent an entire global ideology spanning over a century
/r/MensRights21/10/25 03:31 PM
1

I like how you have ignored my comment about how feminists were prosecuted because it goes against your beliefs You really don't understand what due process is. It is a legal principle that has absolutely nothing to do with personal opinion or public discourse. False allegations are awful, there are many laws in place against it i.e knowingly making a false report to the police, defamation etc. False allegations are just incredibly difficult to prove since there has to be evidence that the accus…
/r/MensRights20/10/25 07:21 PM
1

They absolutely were prosecuted for said actions, over 1300 suffragette were imprisoned between 1906-1914. I don't think you understand what due process is, due process refers to the idea that every individual deserves a fair chance when facing legal action. What you are referring to is public opinion, Emily Lindin is a writer and has nothing to do with due process and your other examples also have nothing to do with due process 🤷 How are "innocent men" suffering due to feminist protests in the …
/r/MensRights20/10/25 01:39 PM
0

Feminists have done many illegal acts in protest, starting with the suffragettes who destroyed property and other violent acts - this was done because decades of peaceful protests didn't work so the suffragettes believed that the only way to gain equal rights was through illegal actions as this forced the government to act. They were right though, it did force the government to act and was incredibly more effective than peaceful protests. Due process very much exists for all crimes What about Ma…
/r/MensRights20/10/25 09:18 AM
0

Honestly, I haven't looked into the different waves of feminism in enough depth to answer that. Ive always been more interested in reading about the different branches of feminism so radical, intersectional, liberal etc. I don't believe the term toxic masculinity is inherently toxic itself as the definition is simply, 'a set of attitudes and ways of behaving stereotypically associated with or expected of men, regarded as having a negative impact on men and on society as a whole.', and I agree th…
/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:51 PM
-2

I'm more than happy to address sources but that comment was incredibly difficult to read based on how it was formatted which is why I asked for it to be formatted differently, I have now addressed the points. I don't argue in bad faith and I have had good interactions in this sub many times 🤷 I absolutely do care about mens rights which is why I'm here, I'm not here to argue but if I disagree with something then obviously I'm going to add my opinion... this is reddit after all
/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:13 PM
-2

Toxic masculinity has nothing to do with 'male biology', it simply refers to stereotypical attitudes and behaviours that are expected of men that have a negative impact on men and society as a whole. For example, the common notion that men shouldn't show emotion would be classed as toxic masculinity as it is a stereotypical attitude of men that negatively impacts men. College rates have been dropping for men due to a multitude of factors i.e cultural shifts, economic factors, educational changes…
/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:11 PM
-7

You didn't address any of it, you dismissed it based on your own preconceived beliefs. Im sorry, this is just word vomit. Can you structure what you're trying to say in a more coherent format so I can actually address it?
/r/MensRights19/10/25 06:43 PM
-8

I have already addressed all of the points you have mentioned here in a previous thread... do you just copy and paste the same paragraph to everything you disagree with? You never even addressed my rebuttals, constantly copying and pasting the same thing without acknowledging what other people say is not the way to have a conversation. The sources you have quoted simply discuss how testosterone levels should be taken into account in female sports...the others discuss birth rates... Feminism isn'…
/r/MensRights19/10/25 06:23 PM
-16

Feminism is a global ideology which seeks to eradicate the oppression of women and to create an equal society between both men and women. Oppression refers to unjust treatment. Women are oppressed in a multitude of countries. For example, in Afghanistan, women aren't allowed to leave the house without a male guardian, girls cannot attend secondary school and are forced to wear the hijab. The feminist organisation UN women works closely in supporting women and girls under Taliban rule, partnering…
/r/MensRights19/10/25 05:06 PM
1

Because being right or wrong is irrelevant to what I’m saying, it doesn’t matter so therefore not important for me to infer my opinion. All I’m saying is constantly redirecting criticism to an opposing ideology and comparing the actions of this sub to said opposition isn’t a solution, it is an avoidance of the issue.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 04:44 PM
1

I never pinned his actions solely on the Manosphere, I simply said that mainstream media substantially minimised his involvement with said ideology and therefore reduced the impact it had on his subsequent crimes. Obviously, there are an array of things that eventually led to the crimes taking place, I have never denied this. Again, I never denied that there were other factors that led to Solanas crime but it is a fact that the shooting of Warhol was labelled as ideologically motivated, that doe…
/r/MensRights19/10/25 09:59 AM
0

Again, you're still saying but they're worse which indirectly excuses the behaviour on this sub. Twochromosomes would say that this sub is objectively worse, this back and forth doesnt address the actual issues.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 09:45 AM
1

If you weren’t talking about trans women yet used that phrasing then that just demonstrates how ignorant you are to common talking points within conservative media… Anyway, this is a pointless exchange so going to stop responding here.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 09:05 PM
1

“Who don’t even know what a woman is” is a common talking point referring to trans women used by conservatives as a gotcha towards left leaning individuals. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:51 PM
8

The use of tablets does not cause autism in children.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:29 PM
-1

And women's/ feminist subs would argue that this sub is 10x worse, it just becomes a never ending 'but they're worse' back and forth without actually addressing the problem.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:24 PM
3

How have you managed to bring up pedos and trans people in this discussion? Genuinely, that is weird of you...
/r/MensRights18/10/25 01:40 PM
0

Violence against women inspired by manosphere ideology is not 'overemphasised', if anything, it is often minimised substantially. For example, mainstream media substantially minimised Jake Davisons involvement in manosphere and incel ideology, describing him instead as a 'lone actor' and therefore reducing the impact that manosphere content had on his subsequent crimes. "Also if nobody considers feminist hate to be hateful, why would any female attack on a man even possibly be considered hate-ba…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 01:10 PM
-7

You understand that I haven’t read the entire thread outside of OP and the replies to me…? I think the mainstream focus is on spaces like this rather than feminist spaces because this breeds a level of extremism that has caused multiple mass shootings and killings of women related to “manosphere” and incel ideology. Due to that, hate in feminists spaces and hate in spaces like this simply aren’t comparable and you are being disingenuous if you try to say differently
/r/MensRights18/10/25 12:32 PM
-7

I have never said that comments aren’t made on the other side, it is odd for you to even mention that right now. Why can’t you acknowledge disgusting comments without pointing the finger at others saying they do it too?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 12:16 PM
-14

This is disgustingly sexist. Edit: the fact OP is getting upvoted for comparing women to children is the reason why this subreddit and MRAs in general are seen as misogynistic and a gateway to extremism. Yet people here will still act shocked when people rightly call this subreddit out for this type of content.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 11:25 AM
1

There's feeling discriminated against and then there's actually facing discrimination. The negative male tropes in films absolutely portray men in a negative light and they do perpetuate negative stereotypes but it is not discrimination in a legal or systemic sense. Also, it is completely incorrect to act like said tropes are apparent in almost every form of media when that is far from the case. When this does happen, the most common portrayal is the 'lazy dad' stereotype and this is almost alwa…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 10:00 PM
1

Many scientific areas are impacted by the replication crisis such as psychology, medicine, neuroscience etc. The replication crisis is addressed in all of the scientific disciplines I have mentioned through more vigorous methods, transparency regarding data collection, the analysis etc. As well as that, if something cant be replicated and there are inherent issues with the study, new theories will be developed based on new research - the fun thing about science is that it is constantly changing,…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:13 PM
1

Considering I have listed some of the most popular series, I don't believe they're the 'exceptions', I would believe that though if I listed more niche series/ films. I also wouldn't consider AHS 'man hating', the cast is extremely diverse and both men and women are portrayed as the 'bad guys' as well as the good. If you can provide an example tho on how its man hating then pls do
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:00 PM
1

By taking nerds out of the equation, you have essentially eradicated a vast amount of smart characters, both men and women. The most well known intelligent female characters are nerds i.e Hermione Grainger, Lisa Simpson, Matilda, Wednesday Addams... which is what I'm trying to say, your requirements for an intelligent character barely fits any intelligent character, male or female. Its media, of course they're going to rely on tropes to construct the characters personality. You're essentially sa…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:57 PM
0

Let’s go back to where I said what she did wasn’t ok and that she shouldn’t be idolised.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:34 PM
-6

So, your point is ridiculous then. You're essentially saying that 'nerds' are incomparable to the average man despite nerds simply being people who are interested and enthusiastic about knowledge/ intelligence. If you're ruling out people who fall under that definition then of course you're barely going to see intelligent men, intelligence requires a level of enthusiasm for knowledge. They did not "treat" Michael like the antichrist, he was the antichrist. Kyle was not braindead, it was noted se…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 03:29 PM
-3

Klaus isn't an exception and isn't meant to be a genius level character, there are many male characters within that series that are intelligent, so no it does not fit that. Maybe watch the series instead of guessing. Men are less powerful in the season 'coven', yes but you're missing out the part where the most powerful warlock (male version of witch) in the series is more powerful than all the witches combined and becomes the supreme. The witches in the season are only more powerful than the me…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 02:49 PM
-1

Obviously, men are portrayed badly in some areas, just as almost every demographic is portrayed badly in media to a point. OP was making out like there is literally no media in which men are portrayed positively outside of series where the male is at genius level i.e Young Sheldon. I was simply saying this isn't the case by listing some of the best performing series on Netflix as well as a newly released book that is a bestseller. I think the issue is many people on this sub like to exist in a b…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 02:32 PM
1

Your comment is dismissing an entire social science based on your own complete misunderstanding of psychology, of course I'm going to dismiss misinformation.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 11:58 AM
-3

I don't think idolising her is correct but it is disgusting of you to act like she wasn't a victim, to act like there is a comparison to be made to individuals who commit crimes for the thrill of it. It was literally demonstrated in court that she was under such an extreme amount of stress and abuse that she temporarily went insane and was therefore not responsible for her actions. She has dedicated her life to helping victims of domestic abuse, to help them to escape the situations they're in s…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 10:15 AM
-6

Firstly, it is ridiculous to compare her to Ted Bundy, they are not comparable and that is an insult to the victims of Bundy who didn't do anything. There absolutely is evidence of this man being abusive, he has received multiple convictions for domestic violence against multiple women. She accused him of abusing her constantly throughout their relationship, John denied such claims but was cross examined in court and his statements conflicted with multiple known facts of the case. As well as tha…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 09:47 AM
-29

What about the vampire diaries? One of the most popular shows on Netflix and has an array of extremely smart male characters. One of them being klaus who’s whole character is based on his intelligence, thirst for knowledge and being one step ahead of everyone else. American horror story? Multiple intelligent male characters in each season. Medusa by Rosie Hewlett? Perseus is written as incredibly intelligent Stranger things? The boys whole thing is that they’re “nerds” and very intelligent 🤷 bra…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 08:49 AM
1

You realise ethical standards were put in place based on unethical studies from the past?
/r/MensRights17/10/25 07:43 AM
1

You realise I wasn't trying to define what a troll is...? I was simply responding to a user who called me a troll and implied that I will go on to insult someone. The sentence you have referred to is simply me denying such claims.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 02:20 PM
0

I'm not a troll and I haven't insulted anyone at all in this sub, I have always remained respectful 🤷 Odd that you just made up a scenario in which I insult you and then you insulted me based on a scenario you created... Literally all legal rights can be taken away, all human rights can be taken away... they're still rights. Nice quote though. I've never shat on men, I literally am a man so that wouldn't make much sense, I'm not delusional and I don't see myself as superior to anyone, I have onl…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 12:17 PM
1

Ironically, you're the one with a very black and white perspective as you aren't acknowledging the nuance behind such jokes which demonstrates why they can be harmful. To address your example, a sexist joke made in private within a group perpetrates stereotypes and reinforces prejudice beliefs. You have to look at what you're finding funny, someone makes a joke about how women should stay in the kitchen - this joke relies on the historical context in which women were expected to be housewives an…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 10:48 AM
1

So you ignored my point completely about the inherent harm of sexist jokes towards men and women and how this impacts equality and simplified it to "funny jokes are funny". Listen, I don't think sexist jokes are at the utmost importance when fighting for equality but it would be ignorant to suggest that they don't harm the group they're targeting through the perpetuation of stereotypes, the normalisation of discrimination and the reinforcement of prejudice beliefs.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 10:30 AM
-1

I mean, that just shows a complete lack of understanding of how equality is achieved and the inherent harm of sexist jokes. Sexist jokes reinforce prejudice beliefs, increase tolerance for discrimination and further perpetuate stereotypes. If you're for sexist jokes towards both men and women then it is hypocritical of you to even be on a sub for gendered equality since you don't actually care to change your behaviour to improve equality 🤷
/r/MensRights15/10/25 10:07 AM
0

proving my point lmao
/r/MensRights15/10/25 09:37 AM
-5

if you believe that sexist jokes are funny and shouldn't be called out, that demonstrates how ridiculously hypocritical you are. How can you be on a sub for equal gendered rights while openly stating that sexist jokes not being funny is an opinion and implying that said jokes are acceptable. It just further shows that many people here aren't actually for equal rights.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 09:37 AM
0

I've seen this argument a lot, that it's just 'trolls' or 'feminists trying to make the movement look bad' etc. but you can look at almost any post on this sub and I can guarantee there will be misogynistic comments, there will be hostility, someone with a different opinion will be getting insulted... and their comments will be downvoted whereas the 'trolls' will receive dozens, if not hundreds, of upvotes. I'd agree with you if it was only on occasion and they didn't get much attention but it d…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 09:33 AM
1

Not sure why you’re getting defensive about your girlfriend, I specifically said in my previous comment that I’m not necessarily talking about your relationship but rather in general regarding age gap relationships. I’m 22 and I like to think that I’m mature but maturity does not equate to fully developed brain. It is a fact that the brain is not developed until your mid twenties and it is a fact that the prefrontal cortex is the last section to fully develop, the prefrontal cortex being respons…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 07:18 AM
-14

Allowing participation from individuals who disagree with the overall views in this sub does not mean said members of the sub aren't hostile to outside views. For example, I stated on this sub that sexist jokes towards women aren't funny and I was met with hostility, I was called a woman and received an array of sexist 'go back to the kitchen' jokes. In general though, different opinions are met with downvotes, completely dismissed and, in many cases, are met with insults 🤷 This comment will mos…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 09:53 PM
4

You're right, this type of bad data can literally destroy lives depending on what the topic is and what results they're falsifying. Not to mention how it negatively impacts actual, credible research.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:38 PM
3

So what you're saying is you produced biased, falsified and fabricated research that has no basis in academia yet you passed it off as credible 'research' to the general public and relied on the naivety of said population. That is still illegal in many countries, 100% unethical and could literally ruin your career/ place of employment. Again, I would not advise you to openly tell people you have done this because it is incredibly damning.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 06:29 PM
5

What I said still applies to private, it is incredibly unethical, at worst illegal and at best serious research misconduct. I wouldn’t go around saying you fabricated/ falsified research. That’s incredibly damning
/r/MensRights14/10/25 05:56 PM
10

I have two degrees in psychology, I have published scientific research and I currently work within research at a university. You are right in the sense that you can manipulate studies to produce the results you desire but that is where scientific integrity comes in as well as how studies have to be peer reviewed before publication to ensure quality, validity and accuracy. Studies have to go through vigorous ethical standards before it can even be conducted, researchers also have to include a ref…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 05:23 PM
-8

That's true of course and no one should be forced to converse with someone that isn't their type. I actually did a dissertation recently on racism within gay dating apps and honestly, the impact of putting "no asians, no black people etc." in bios is heartbreaking. Idk, putting preferences in bios is a slippery slope to that kind of thing
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:10 PM
-8

That's true but being rude and, in many cases, racist to people in your bio because of your preference is just unnecessary. Just don't respond/ swipe on the people you aren't into 🤷
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:01 PM
-9

I mean, that is a huge issue on gay dating apps. The objectification of men and the racism I’ve seen on those apps is awful
/r/MensRights14/10/25 02:54 PM
-3

Racism and misogyny are embedded into almost every aspect of society, commonly referred to as systemic. Literally sociology 101, it isn't 'unhealthy' to be educated on sociological perspectives and theories. The individual I was replying to was clearly not simply 'being critical of others', they were discussing traits and grouping all women together. Evidenced by the last paragraph which goes into a tangent about how they find beauty intimidating, "Look the only thing that ever intimidated me wa…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 01:28 PM
-6

Why would you not care about your partners degree? Something they're passionate about, something they have worked hard for. Honestly, this whole thing reads like you just hate women.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 09:20 AM
-1

You realise thats how the vast majority of people die? Outside of extremely famous people but even they will be forgotten eventually. Your 'lineage' means absolutely nothing, most people don't even know the names of their great grandparents. It's really odd that you are deriving comfort from someone's death, someone you don't even know.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 09:18 AM
1

I don’t think it’s a fair argument to say morality is subjective in this instance. While morality is subjective, age gap relationships being immoral is based on immutable biological facts that cause a power dynamic within said relationship, making it inherently immoral. For example, the brain isn’t fully developed until your mid twenties with the pre frontal cortex being the last section to fully mature. The prefrontal cortex is responsible for decision making and planning - an older person bein…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 08:00 AM
1

That's like saying how are there any laws about what we can or cannot do on the internet because what can the police do? They can do a lot
/r/MensRights13/10/25 07:44 PM
2

It seems like many people here have a very black and white view and cannot comprehend nuance
/r/MensRights13/10/25 03:11 PM
5

Do you know what a terminal diagnosis is? He is going to die no matter what. They’re both waiting for his death. Wanting him to live as long as possible with stage 4 cancer while in and out of hospice is unbelievably selfish and cruel, he is in immense pain every single day
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:48 PM
4

Grief is also a natural thing people feel when a loved one is diagnosed with a terminal illness. You shouldn't judge someone for wanting that perpetual state of grief to end so they can finally begin the mourning process. This whole post is really gross icl, I hope to god you never have to experience a loved one going through terminal cancer.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:40 PM
2

She stated multiple times in the comments and in that post that she adores him, the fact is though that he is dying and they're simply waiting for the inevitable. What I read from that post was the waiting was distressing for her, she knows he's going to die yet she is watching him suffer, she is watching him in immense pain knowing how it ends but having to wait, not knowing when it will end. I understand your feelings towards this, it's a horrendous situation for everyone involved but conflict…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:13 PM
3

People can comment on what they like but in this instance, it comes across an insensitive
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:04 PM
-9

I never said she was the victim, I simply explained why many people have conflicted feelings when seeing their partner literally dying in front of them.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:03 PM
-9

I think it's really complicated and conflicting feelings are normal in such distressing circumstances. My father was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer two years ago which was a shock considering he was in his 40s and perfectly healthy in every other sense and his relationship with his wife didn't survive the diagnosis. The gut reaction of course is to be disgusted at someone who would have such thoughts mentioned in the post regarding their sick partner but she's witnessing her partner literally dyi…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 12:23 PM
0

I disagree, I think AI will be restricted very soon. The law hasn’t caught up with the technology yet but I do believe restrictions will be put in place, specially due to the crimes people are committing with AI
/r/MensRights13/10/25 08:37 AM
1

I do think there is a difference between legality and morality, just because something is legal and both are consenting adults doesn't make it morally right. I'm not necessarily talking about your relationship, just playing devils advocate 🤷
/r/MensRights12/10/25 05:59 PM
3

That’s not true actually, conservative clothing is actually in fashion and has been steadily rising for a few years now. https://www.nssmag.com/en/fashion/38892/fashion-conservatism-quiet-luxury-trad-wife-anti-feminism
/r/MensRights12/10/25 11:33 AM
1

Sure, maybe they shouldn't verbalise their thoughts but they obviously assumed your gf was ur daughter which is why they were even talking to you to begin with. Finding out that you're actually partners can be shocking, especially if your girlfriend is significantly younger 🤷 Yeah, you will rightfully go to prison if you physically assault someone for saying something you dislike. Maybe take a page from your girlfriend's book and just politely correct people and laugh it off, in the grand scheme…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 10:52 PM
-3

I absolutely can speak on this because that isn’t how laws or policies are drafted and implemented. There’s a set process that each law and policy must go through, they have to use peer reviewed sources, they’re debated, they go through multiple consultations etc.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 08:15 PM
-3

Im telling you that people are not drawing information from Ai to draft law and policies, people might use Ai to learn about said laws or policies but thats about it. We should encourage people to do their own research rather than relying on Ai because of the inherent issues with Ai.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:59 PM
-1

Like I said, Asda has done stuff for men to the same capacity and this campaign also includes men, the language is gender neutral and encompasses both men and women. I do get what you're saying but just because you personally don't witness something doesn't mean it isn't happening or it doesn't exist and your first thought when seeing money being raised for cancer shouldn't be 'what about men' tbh
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:52 PM
-5

Laws and policies are not drafted through AI and they never would be. There is a process which laws and policies have to go through before being implemented - they're debated, information from peer reviewed sources are used, multiple consultations etc etc.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:49 PM
0

Or just stop using AI, it is terrible for the environment and the consistent use of it literally decreases your critical thinking abilities, reduces brain activity and impairs memory.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:36 PM
4

Yes, Asda partnered with cancer research on the every man appeal which focused on male specific cancers. As well as this the 'tickled pink' campaign does include men, "Asda’s 2023 Tickled Pink campaign encourages everyone, regardless of age, gender or ethnicity to become Real Self-Checkers and establish a regular breast checking routine".
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:28 PM
1

You're making a lot of assumptions, I have never made any claims about anyone intelligence or critical thinking skills and I have never avoided criticising the white feather campaign. I have actually said that the white feather campaign was a negative for society. I simply provided an explanation for the actions of the people at the time, it is incredibly simplistic to simply state an action was wrong and to not provide historical context.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 06:02 PM
1

My comment was highlighting the fact that it isn't just women that hold negative beliefs about age gap relationships, as this post implies.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:57 PM
1

War time propaganda in the UK focused largely on masculinity, linking masculinity to enlisting in the military. There was a focus on men being the 'protectors' and bravery and therefore when they did not go to the war, this elicited the idea of cowardice from the general public. You have to remember that this was a time in which gender roles were rigid so it did not take much propaganda for the white feather campaign to be born. Again, feminism is a global ideology so is therefore relevant until…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:57 PM
1

This entire post is about assumptions made by women about OPs relationship?
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:18 PM
0

I never said it was ok? I provided an explanation for their actions. Also, the white feather campaign and gaining rights as women aren't exactly comparable. Rights for women is universally looked upon as a positive for society whereas the white feather campaign is historically looked upon as a negative due to the negative impact it had on men at that time. So yes, gaining the rights for women was good and the white feather campaign was bad, not exactly sure of the hypocrisy here.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:17 PM
1

You keep trying to apply our standards to individuals during the war time. Yes, they were individuals and chose to do something but that statement completely ignores the environment in which they existed in, the propaganda they were exposed to and the overarching beliefs during that time. It did damage their relationship but that isn't relevant to my point, as I keep saying, my point was there were a multitude of opinions held by different suffragettes during the war time and it is unfair to tal…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:13 PM
-2

I wasn't trying to discredit your experiences, I was simply sharing my experiences that differ quite drastically. Everything isn't based on grades and experience, I was referring to my experience when applying for research positions when I stated that. There is a need for gender based encouragement due to how women are under represented in specific areas. Most people prefer to be friends with others that agree with them politically and socially, that goes for both right and left wing individuals…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:05 PM
1

I don't use AI, I disagree with it due to the impact it has on the environment, nice failed observation though. When in doubt blame AI I suppose. I didn't go into detail about the specifics of the white feather campaign because it wasn't relevant to the comment I was responding to. The information you have provided also simply isn't relevant, the point is that it was a propaganda tool used to shame men into enlisting in the military and knowledge we know about war time propaganda now cannot be a…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 04:40 PM
1

I think it's reasonable for people to assume she's your daughter and you can't exactly blame anyone for assuming she's your daughter considering you have the typical age gap people have with their children. This isn't just a 'woman's thing', the vast majority of individuals would assume she is your daughter and many would make the assumptions you have shared in this post about your relationship. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-018-9895-6 - found that age gap relationships are ge…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 04:14 PM
-2

As someone who just finished my Masters degree (22M), I haven't found this at all. I gained a research internship in my second year of undergrad and I then went onto a paid research position through my university during my masters, there was never any bias towards men or women. It was completely based on your grades and experience. There is a push for women in STEM fields but this is because they're underrepresented in this area, it is simply there to encourage women to get involved and to make …
/r/MensRights11/10/25 03:56 PM
-2

The way you're discussing the suffragettes as a monolith demonstrate your lack of knowledge regarding history. Emmeline Pankhurst and a group of suffragettes supported the war time efforts and they encouraged women to get involved. However, Sylvia Pankhurst and a different group of women were completely opposed to conscription and the war in general and absolutely protested. Some suffragettes did participate in the white feather campaign, you have to remember that they are a product of their tim…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 03:30 PM
1

What are you talking about?? I have never “boasted” about karma, I am literally on -100 because of this sub lmao
/r/MensRights11/10/25 10:03 AM
0

If you seriously believe that Reddit upvotes = right and downvotes = wrong then I’d advise you to take a break from Reddit.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 09:31 AM
1

The thing is, it might be an expression of hurt but that doesn't make it any less misogynistic and it would be irresponsible to not call it out because that is how people become radicalised misogynists. I'm not sure how they don't understand that. Look at Elliot Rogers, he started off as being 'hurt' until he was radicalised and it evolved into hatred
/r/MensRights09/10/25 11:04 AM
-7

Yep, just look at the comments on this post. That the misogyny here is 'mild' so not worth making a post about, how misogyny is 'understandable', pointing out misogyny is 'keeping men in check' and misandrist... The way they're proving your point and not even realising is honestly ridiculous
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:43 AM
-13

The fact you have put the word misogyny in quotation marks and have diminished it to "some mean words" is literally proving OPs point.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:21 AM
-15

I've found this too, many people in this sub are incredibly sexist. I mentioned in a post how sexist jokes really aren't funny and I got many replies calling me a woman as an insult and 'go make a sandwich' jokes despite me literally being a man 🤷‍♂️ And yet, members of this subreddit will complain and wonder why this subreddit has a bad reputation. Read any post in this sub and I can almost guarantee there will be a sexist comment somewhere, whether in the actual post or in the comments.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:09 AM
3

Exactly, if anything it makes me more secure in my choice to never have children lmao
/r/MensRights08/10/25 07:49 PM
5

It's really odd to assume that anyone who questions marriage is 'lashing out because they're insecure about not being married'.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 07:07 PM
-2

You're very clearly wrong 🤷
/r/MensRights08/10/25 09:36 AM
-4

The 'disproportionately male' point isn't used in a legitimate way, it is fear mongering. They dislike all asylum seekers and therefore use the men, who are typically stronger than women and therefore pose more of a threat, as a scapegoat. They do not care whether it is men, women or children seeking asylum. They are racist. This has been demonstrated in multiple cases. Just a few weeks ago, a woman was attacked and sexually assaulted by two men which was motivated by her race.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 09:13 PM
-8

I mean, if you are using Facebook posts as a source of information regarding immigration then of course it is going to appear incredibly simplistic i.e men vs women. That isn't the case, they're racists against all immigration, not just men. And yes, polite society would absolutely bash entire groups of women based on the actions of a few. Look at the Shamima Begum case, that case caused wide spread islamophobia against muslim women, specifically regarding veiled muslim women.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 06:17 PM
2

Of course, I find it ridiculous how this person is even getting upvoted when they're completely misinformed.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 06:09 PM
-3

If your family members were never violent then obviously violence never occurred and no one saw it as acceptable, right? It is ridiculous to go off your anecdotal experience, your family members do not represent the entire population.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 11:50 AM
1

Domestic violence laws are gender neutral in the UK, what you are referring to is simply how the crimes are categorised i.e the name of the model. Women and girls are disproportionately impacted by said crimes which is why the model is called that, should it be gender neutral? Yes but does the name of the model impact how male victims are treated and how their abuse is recorded? No. Male victims are still recorded as male victims and all laws are gender neutral in language
/r/MensRights06/10/25 09:22 AM
1

So you ignored everything I said, stated that the research I sent you was 'biased' but you expect me to take your research at face value. I read the study you sent, it has nothing to do with attitudes in the 1950s... it is 1968-1994... so already, this paper doesn't help your point at all. Anyway, the research actually states that 25% of men in 1968 approved of 'husband slapping wife' which has gradually declined since then to around 16% by 1994. We can only assume that approval was even higher …
/r/MensRights06/10/25 09:11 AM
-11

Yes, I read your comment, did you understand mine? I said that you act like domestic violence was not worse during this time, which your comment does imply. Domestic violence against men 100% has changed since the 1950s, there are many helplines for male victims and over 80% of domestic violence shelters in the USA accept male victims. Guess how many helplines and shelters there were for men in the 50s? Oh right, zero. Domestic violence against men in the 1950s was not seen as equal to women, ma…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 10:41 PM
-13

Your comment is completely inaccurate, your post is based on the USA so I will be only talking about the US as well in this comment. Firstly, domestic violence was not acceptable in the 1950s but it also wasn't condemned as it is today as women had few legal protections and the police ignored many domestic violence reports as it was considered a 'private matter' which is why the data for domestic abuse from this time is extremely unreliable. It should also be noted that the first domestic violen…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 09:21 PM
2

Women have to go through the exact same process men have to go through if they wish to terminate their parental rights. Safe haven laws only apply to infants under 3 weeks and it is to prevent people abandoning their babies in an unsafe way. Safe haven laws do not just apply to the mother, both parents remain anonymous.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 02:21 PM
-3

You have to remember that it isn't just about the father, there is a child involved and the court has to take into consideration what is best for them as well.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:28 PM
-4

It isn't a straight forward matter, it has to go through court and it usually has to meet two requirements 1) it's in the Childs best interest and 2) there is another parent willing to adopt i.e step parent If it goes through court though, the father is completely stripped of parental rights and would not be required to pay child support
/r/MensRights05/10/25 12:10 PM
-8

You’re essentially referring to terminating parental rights, this cannot be done during the pregnancy because the baby isn’t legally considered a person until it’s born. Men absolutely have the right to terminate their parental rights after the child is born but this does not fall under reproductive rights as it has nothing to do with reproduction. What is reproductive rights is the ability to choose to use protection, the ability to consent to intercourse etc.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 10:01 AM
1

Sure ✌️
/r/MensRights04/10/25 11:27 PM
1

So your issue really isn't with male representation, your issue is when there are women in the movies too with strong roles i.e 'girl boss characters'
/r/MensRights04/10/25 12:16 PM
0

Yep, misogyny 🤷
/r/MensRights03/10/25 07:04 PM
1

42% of films had a female lead and 42% of films had a male lead in 2024, genres with male leads genres such as action, thriller etc. Maybe look at the actual facts rather than making up information based on the few films you have seen
/r/MensRights03/10/25 06:57 PM
-1

Read my original comment.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 05:10 PM
-21

I explained why it's inaccurate, you agreed with my points and then mentioned parts of the post that have nothing to do with the title. It is inaccurate and you know it
/r/MensRights03/10/25 04:36 PM
-26

I did read it completely, your post did not mention any of that though which is why I didn't. You simply said "Misandrist woman believes abused men lie about being abused and they themselves are the abusers" which is completely inaccurate.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 04:27 PM
-38

This commenter is not saying that 'abused men lie about being abused', they're specifically talking about perpetrators of abuse who lie and say they're the one being abused, this is a recorded phenomenon. The commenter even mentions that perpetrators who lie about being abused take away resources from actual men and women who are victims of abuse. Let's actually read it and understand what the commenter is saying before jumping to conclusions.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 03:53 PM
-3

In 2024, 72% of films featured more men with speaking roles than women and only 21% of films had more female than male characters. The general rule is that men are more represented in media than women.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 12:46 PM
-17

I’m sorry, not watching something simply because there’s a female lead is ridiculous
/r/MensRights03/10/25 12:41 PM
1

Way to miss my point
/r/MensRights03/10/25 09:15 AM
2

Still missing my point and your explanation doesn’t work in real life. There is not one good surgeon in a hospital, there are usually dozens to hundreds of surgeons in a single hospital, no one would die if one surgeon was dismissed. What you’re essentially saying is you’re completely happy for a surgeon to work who is guilty of sexual misconduct, who doesn’t understand boundaries and who is at a heightened risk to sexually assault patients. That mindset is the reason why so many surgeons have g…
/r/MensRights03/10/25 08:56 AM
2

“Goofy at flirting”? You mean being sexually in appropriate? Sexual misconduct? Let’s not lessen the severity of the doctors actions, what he did demonstrates a complete lack of regard for someone’s boundaries. Someone who works with vulnerable individuals should know how to act appropriately
/r/MensRights03/10/25 08:43 AM
2

You seem to be missing my point entirely, you realise that individuals who commit sexual misconduct are much more likely to sexually assault? Especially when you take into consideration the vulnerability of the patients. Wouldn’t you rather a surgeon that isn’t guilty of sexual misconduct compared to one that is? If you’re seriously saying no then you’re being disingenuous
/r/MensRights03/10/25 08:41 AM
-3

I used him as an example because he received a suspended sentence in 2005 and was allowed to continue his practice which resulted in 300+ charges against him. It is an extreme example but my point is, doctors should be trusted 100% by their patients. They shouldn't have to worry that the doctor may be sexually inappropriate with them during the surgery. And to answer your question, I absolutely would not want my female relatives to be operated on a doctor that has been charged with sexual miscon…
/r/MensRights02/10/25 07:52 PM
-1

A French surgeon was recently convicted for sexually assaulting his patients, many of them children, while they were under anaesthesia/ sedation for a surgery. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo%C3%ABl_Le_Scouarnec - are you seriously telling me that you would not care if a doctor like this was the one performing the surgery? Doctors face strict regulations for a reason, they’re in a trusted position with extremely vulnerable people. Patients should be able to trust their doctor explicitly.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 07:32 PM
0

Hysterics? No. There’s a reason why doctors face strict regulations in how they conduct themselves, they’re dealing with people in extremely vulnerable situations. A doctor should be someone you can trust explicitly
/r/MensRights02/10/25 07:07 PM
1

Would you feel comfortable if your wife, daughter, sister etc. had to go to the hospital and her doctor was found guilty of sexual misconduct? Does that sound like a safe environment for patients?
/r/MensRights02/10/25 04:39 PM
13

An American would not be considered “exotic” in any Scandinavian country 💀
/r/MensRights02/10/25 02:10 PM
1

Who are said "red pilled Gen z men" having children with? Considering that there is a clear political divide between Gen z men and women, with women more likely to hold progressive views and over 70% of married/ cohabitating partners share the same political beliefs.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 01:08 PM
-3

If you can't understand why sexist stereotypes, jokes and generalisations are wrong without being spoon fed why they're wrong then id advise you to educate yourself on such topics to gain a deeper understanding.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 06:18 PM
0

This is insanely ironic, you wont explain the joke but are rather implying that the joke was about kink, you are making a joke that sexualises women without their consent while they are dressed as a handmaid in a form of protest, a handmaid that represents oppression and the loss of bodily autonomy. Yet, I'm the one that doesn't understand consent and you are seriously calling me a 'predator'? Jesus, the projection is strong. I'm not raging, I was simply asking you a question regarding your joke…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:45 PM
-6

And that is a dystopian future.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:27 PM
1

Sure. I've read the book several times and I've watched the series. Please, explain your joke. What was the punchline? I can only assume that the joke was "women who dress as a handmaid from the book subconsciously want to get abused", which is fucking sick. If I'm wrong then please elaborate and explain the joke. Your avoidance of an explanation is speaking volumes.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:27 PM
1

You're so weird for assuming that I know this person and that I must have asked them to be here. Because god forbid, someone disagrees with you, right? You keep stating that it was a joke, what was the punchline of said joke? Please, explain your joke.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:11 PM
-2

I'm not saying that everyone has the beliefs that I have mentioned on this sub, that would be ridiculous. But while moderators are allowing these types of views onto the sub, it will never be taken seriously because the first thing people see when entering it are misogynistic comments and beliefs 🤷 The fact that said comments are so widely upvoted further hinders this subreddit and how it is perceived to others
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:07 PM
1

I find it ironic how you are quoting Simon Baron Cohen, a British psychologist, which is a social science while saying women populate all social sciences. Which is it? You're quoting outdated research, research now challenges the idea that prenatal testosterone alone causes brain differences between males and females or explains autism. While small average sex differences in empathy and systemising exist, they heavily overlap and are influenced by many factors beyond hormones, including genetics…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 01:36 PM
-12

Just proving my point, this is why this sub will always been seen as a misogynistic cesspool, because it is.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 01:30 PM
-24

I mean, look at the recent posts in this sub. One discussing how 'women have contributed to societal collapse', another asking what women are better at than men and the comments are filled with sexist stereotypes and jokes, the generalisation of women essentially being gold diggers who are after mens money... I could go on. If this sub doesn't want to be seen as hateful towards women then said members should move away from blatant sexism and hateful comments towards women. It isn't being brainwa…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 09:54 AM
-1

The study you quoted just states that women are more likely to emphasise compared to men who are more likely to systemise. It isn't saying that men are objectively better at rationalising, just that they're more likely to try and rationalise over emphasising. That could be for a multitude of reasons i.e socialisation. Men are typically socialised to 'man up' and to not show emotion in contrast to women who are typically socialised to express emotions. If you're socialised to not express emotions…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 09:32 AM
0

By your logic, anyone who leaves a comment on Reddit is begging for attention. It’s called an open forum, people leave comments to engage with what was written. You’re replying to me, does that mean you’re begging for my attention? I feel like this is serious projection, I have a brilliant relationship with my father.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 07:49 AM
-1

Because arguing with men online on an anonymous platform is peak relevancy. You got me
/r/MensRights01/10/25 07:09 AM
2

I know ur trying to be funny but it’s super cringe mate sorry 💀 anywayyy
/r/MensRights30/09/25 08:04 PM
1

I’m literally a man, kinda making yourself look silly with the whole sandwich thing but 🤷 u do u
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:56 PM
-13

I'm not offended by the joke, I'm pointing out the issues with said joke. There's a difference. You realise that you can concentrate on two things at once? I left a quick comment on reddit, not exactly dedicating my time to this.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:18 PM
-23

You realise that it’s still misogynistic whether it’s a joke or not? Literally demonstrated with your “make me a sandwich” joke, it’s all rooted in sexism lmao. This is the problem with misogynists, they think it’s a gotcha by saying something is a joke almost like jokes can’t be sexist? My point 100% stands Granted though, I should have read the humour marker 🤷
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:11 PM
-26

The irony in talking about misandry while saying you don’t like having a woman telling you how to do things. That’s called misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:03 PM
-16

That isn't what I'm saying at all, bisexual women's attraction to men is 100% genuine, that is why they're bisexual and not lesbian. What I am saying is there are a multitude of reasons as to why bisexual women may prefer dating men compared to women, reasons like the ones I listed prior. It is a complete fact that gay dating pools are smaller than straight dating pools.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 04:40 PM
-8

What I am simply saying is there are a multitude of factors to consider, are there bisexual women that genuinely just prefer dating men? Absolutely. Are there bisexual women that primarily date men for other reasons? Also absolutely. You have to consider factors such as internalised homophobia, homophobia of the general population, the fact that women seeking women is a much smaller dating pool than straight spaces so its considerably easier to find a straight relationship over a gay relationshi…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 03:31 PM
-25

I think it’s unfair to reference how many bisexual women end up dating men and to conclude that they’re more into men. Over 80% of both bisexual men and women end up with a partner of the opposite sex. This is due to a multitude of factors, one of them being homophobia 🤷
/r/MensRights30/09/25 03:07 PM
1

lmao maybeee I'm genuinely just a nice person that women enjoy spending time with? But sure, I will play this game. I'm in a city in England and I'm white British
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:40 PM
0

No, I'm 22. I have never had issues on dating apps or dating in general lmao Nice assumption tho to try and fit me into this odd narrative you're spinning
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:35 PM
0

Im actually a man, speaking from personal experience, I have had romantic partners and I'm not 6ft, I'm not rich... Which is why when I read this type of rhetoric, it doesn't speak true at all and it isn't what you see in real life relationships. Honestly, I barely understand half of what you're saying, a blue pilled beta provider? Chads? I don't mean to sound rude but this sounds quite chronically online and I would advise you to step back from the internet
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:27 PM
-5

Do you unironically believe that women are actually only dating the top 5% of men? When you go outside and see couples, what do you see? Do you just see millionaire model like men with your average woman? Or do you see couples within the same socioeconomic class, similar education, typically from the same area...
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:20 PM
0

Didn't pin it on men or women, I simply stated how men and womens issues on dating apps are connected.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:17 PM
-6

Isn't that true for everyone? If you have 20 flavours of ice cream compared to 2 flavours of ice cream, you have to be more selective because you have to decide which out of the 20 you like the best 🤷
/r/MensRights30/09/25 11:46 AM
-7

The average woman could get hundreds of likes in a short period of time because men, on average, swipe on literally every single profile without even looking whereas women are, on average, more selective when swiping. Many women have stated that, yes, they get plenty of likes but when they actually match with a man, said man doesn't respond to her messages which is most likely due to him swiping on everyone and then deciding he's not interested once matching https://singlegirlblogging.com/2024/0…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 11:31 AM
-5

This is such a disgusting interpretation of the book, what the fuck. "bred repeatedly by wealthy and powerful men", you mean raped? Raped repeatedly? You mean forced to carry a pregnancy to term to then have said child ripped from their arms? You mean raped until they have fulfilled their "duty" to Gilead and they are then sent to a brothel or the colonies? "kept in a place of luxury commensurate with the man's position", you mean held as a sexual slave within a house, confined to a room? You me…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:30 AM
0

You're right in the sense that simply not dating someone because they lack a degree would be classism. However, my reasoning isn't based on them having said degree but more so on having a shared lived experience with me i.e attending higher education, having a passion for education i.e shared interests etc. The traits I have mentioned are important to me 🤷 There's a reason why people tend to marry individuals with a similar educational level to them, one of said reasons being shared experiences …
/r/MensRights29/09/25 01:52 PM
0

I think I have effectively explained my thought process, feelings etc. and I have demonstrated a complete understanding of said thoughts in relation to my dating preferences. That is by definition, self awareness. Just because you dislike my dating preferences, does not mean that I’m not self aware 🤷
/r/MensRights29/09/25 01:40 PM
0

Well, I don't have a low self esteem 🤷 I think you should love yourself to an extent before even getting in a relationship, its good to be confident in yourself and to be in a good place mentally
/r/MensRights29/09/25 11:20 AM
-1

Just someone who is compatible + shared interests lol
/r/MensRights29/09/25 10:48 AM
0

Read through the thread, I have discussed extensively what I meant by that statement and my thought process (:
/r/MensRights29/09/25 09:13 AM
1

I used one of my preferences as an example in my comment, it very def isn’t the be all end all for me and I have explained my thought process extensively in this thread (: If you still think it’s stupid then that’s fair enough, the good thing about preferences is that they’re personal to each individual and they don’t impact anyone else other than yourself
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:12 PM
0

It absolutely does, you just don't seem to be listening to me when I say 'shared life experience' i.e attending university lol
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:02 PM
2

Shared life experiences is applicable due to the fact we would have both attended university and would both have that experience i.e shared life experience. I'm not a traditional person, I'm not looking for a traditional marriage or traits in a woman that would stereotypically class them as a 'good wife'
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:01 PM
-10

My life is practically 100% focused on education since I have two degrees, work in research at a university and plan to get another degree in the future 🤷
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:52 PM
2

I don't believe the majority of people who are interested in learning new things are people who have a degree, not at all. I simply said that my preference is for a potential partner to have a degree due to shared life experiences and values as well as a passion for education 🤷 There's a reason why people tend to marry individuals with a similar educational level as themselves, one of those reasons being shared experiences and values.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:51 PM
-15

It isn't classism to simply want a partner that has a shared experience with you and shared values. As I have mentioned previously, my preference isn't solely based on intelligence but on having a shared experience i.e attending higher education, having a passion for education etc. There are many intelligent people that haven't gone to university and many unintelligent people that have gone to university, of course
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:42 PM
2

I am incredibly passionate about education, I enjoy learning new things. I enjoy going to museums, art galleries, historical landmarks, libraries etc. and I would simply like a partner that shares that interest of mine so we can go to places together and both enjoy it 🤷 It's really not stupid when you put it into perspective
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:40 PM
1

u didn't insult dw I was just explaining my thought process, have a nice rest of ur day (:
/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:45 PM
1

I wouldn't assume someone has a passion for education simply because they have a degree? I would get to know a person while dating to see if we have shared values, things in common etc etc. and not having said passion would be a deal breaker for me. For example, if someone I was dating was like your in laws in which they appear passionate about education on paper but in reality, they aren't interested in what they do at all and have no passion for their work or expanding their mind in general th…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:27 PM
-6

I think it very much depends on who you’re mixing with 🤷 I just finished a postgraduate degree and I was surrounded by people with a passion for education + I work in academic research at a university and I am surrounded by individuals with a passion for education there too. People without said passion would be a niche market for me
/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:13 PM
-11

You’re absolutely right that it rules out many intelligent people but my preference isn’t based solely on intelligence but on a passion for education as well as a similar life experience
/r/MensRights28/09/25 08:57 PM
-30

It's not discrimination to not date someone based on their education and/ or employment. I'm a man and I wouldn't date someone who doesn't have at least a degree because education is important to me and having a partner with shared values is also important to me 🤷 It is literally just preference and there's nothing wrong with that Edit: I find it really interesting how many people in this sub complain about women having lots of preferences/ high standards and men aren't allowed to have said pref…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 07:02 PM
2

Bringing awareness to cluster b personality disorders and mood disorders is important but not in a space like this, it should be in an unbiased space, controlled by psychologists and/or psychiatrists who are able to provide legitimate facts about said disorders without stigmatising and villainising individuals who have been diagnosed. Open discussions surrounding this topic are important but they should not be held by uneducated individuals who simply parrot the same misinformation and who furth…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 03:32 PM
1

"Borderline is the very limit between neurosis (a mental problem blocking your life) and psychosis (out of control delusional craziness) but not enough to put someone in a psychiatric hospital or on mind altering drugs." Literally the first sentence which includes outdated terminology, stigmatising and inaccurate language and misinformation. The post then goes on to speculate whether individuals have BPD based on a misinformed view of the symptoms of BPD which is incredibly harmful and spreading…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 12:38 PM
1

This post has a completely misinformed view of the disorder, no knowledge is being gained from reading this post. BPD is an incredibly complex disorder that requires a comprehensive evaluation of symptoms, patient history, behaviours etc. to diagnose, sometimes taking professionals years to diagnose. It is not beneficial at all to villainise bpd and to speculate over whether someone has bpd.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 11:02 AM
1

Exhibiting some traits and being diagnosed are completely different things and that is also irrelevant to my comment This post is still stigmatising a personality disorder that already faces stigma
/r/MensRights28/09/25 08:39 AM
-1

True but it is fun to witness the mental gymnastics they do to try and portray men as a class that faces systemic oppression
/r/MensRights27/09/25 06:18 PM
2

I don't believe you tbh 🤷 But sure
/r/MensRights27/09/25 06:04 PM
2

A typo* my comments in this thread have been entirely accurate outside of one word The fact you mentioned my education in an attempt to discredit it is odd. It makes you seem jealous and obsessive.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 05:59 PM
6

I misspoke, realised my mistake and didn't bother editing it because it is clear what I meant. I absolutely did earn it, yes. A simple mistake on reddit does not discredit my education.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 04:49 PM
9

You’re self diagnosing people with an extremely uncommon personality disorder based on your misinformed view of said disorder.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 03:07 PM
8

Borderline personality disorder literally impacts 1-3% of the population. The vast majority of individuals do not know someone with BPD and have not been in a relationship with someone with BPD This post is further stigmatising a personality disorder that is caused by severe childhood trauma.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 02:30 PM
1

Real + claims to be a “former intersectional feminist” yet doesn’t understand the basics of intersectionality. Make it make sense
/r/MensRights27/09/25 10:41 AM
-3

Google intersectionality. You can face privilege for one aspect of your identity while facing discrimination for another aspect. For example, I am a man and I face privilege because of that BUT I am also bisexual so I therefore face discrimination due to my sexuality. OR another example for you, a wealthy black man faces advantages in society due to his wealth (i.e. classism) BUT he would still face discrimination due to his race. The world isn't as black and white as you make out. You can be pr…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 08:29 PM
-7

On a systemic level? No since white people and men have not been oppressed at that level in western societies. However, you can be sexist and racist to said demographic on individual levels
/r/MensRights26/09/25 02:46 PM
-9

Due to how systems of power and inequality shapes society, misogyny and racism impact almost every aspect of life 🤷 Sociology 101
/r/MensRights26/09/25 11:15 AM
1

The porn industry is incredibly exploitative and unethical
/r/MensRights25/09/25 03:47 PM
-3

Because I expected u to respect me saying that, kind of hard to ignore someone who spams every single comment you make 💀
/r/MensRights25/09/25 12:16 PM
-13

You're really desperate to argue with me 💀 You know my original comment was true, you focused on one word and then I explained the usage of said word and you essentially said if I was anyone but me, you would believe it 💀 thats wild lol
/r/MensRights25/09/25 09:30 AM
-13

Quotation marks were used to reference the post, "because what she found out was SOO horrible and men were treated SOO badly", I just summarised with the word difficult ✌️
/r/MensRights25/09/25 09:09 AM
-18

I love how you know I'm right but you still want to argue with me so you're focusing on 6 words out of my comment lol
/r/MensRights25/09/25 09:00 AM
-2

I hate how her case is so misinterpreted, she did not commit suicide because being a man “traumatised her” because men have it “so difficult”. She struggled with severe depression for a decade before she ever did this and reported that SSRIs treatment had a detrimental impact on her mental health. After living as a man, she stated that “the burden of deception” of pretending to be a man and living with two gender identities in her mind was too much which contributed to her further mental break d…
/r/MensRights25/09/25 07:21 AM
1

I have also seen men saying they're choosing to not get married but that doesn't erase the men who act entitled to a relationship
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:40 PM
2

Honestly, the way some people talk in this sub, it does sound like many think they're entitled to a relationship which is why I made the comment.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 09:31 PM
1

This isn't a rights issue, no one is entitled to a romantic relationship
/r/MensRights24/09/25 07:14 PM
1

You’d studied feminism, almost became a feminist and then did a complete 180 because you spoke to one person and took their subjective opinion as a universal feminist truth? Because that makes total sense
/r/MensRights24/09/25 04:26 PM
1

You're making it a contest by making this post, you realise that right?
/r/MensRights24/09/25 12:25 PM
-2

Yes im really crying rn
/r/MensRights23/09/25 03:43 PM
-2

bro does not respect boundaries
/r/MensRights23/09/25 03:33 PM
-1

Listen, authors are allowed to write a book about whatever topic they choose and they are not obligated to include anything else. Books about DV that impacts women are important and the topic shouldn't be pushed aside because it upsets you, there are a multitude of books about male victims of DV. The good thing about books is that you don't have to read them, you can find books that you like instead. https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/155806.Domestic_Abuse_With_Male_Victims - books about male v…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 02:59 PM
1

You almost had a “cursing fit” and wanted to tear a book to shreds because it was about domestic violence with a man as the perpetrator and woman as a victim…? It’s a book and the author is allowed to bring attention to domestic violence impacting women. It isn’t “ignoring” DV against men to write about DV against women? If you want to read a book with a male victim then find those books, there are a plethora if you actually looked. Idk man work on your anger.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 08:45 AM
-4

Please stop replying to every single one of my comments, I have told you that I do not want to engage in conversation with after your disgusting comments towards me. I cannot block you because I haven't proved my age on reddit due to privacy concerns and your account is 18+ so I am asking you to please respect my boundaries.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 08:02 PM
-3

Self reported studies are important within psychological research because it allows us to understand peoples thoughts and feelings that otherwise wouldn't be observable. For example, the study I quoted asked the participants how warm they feel towards men - how would you measure this when looking at someone's behaviour? Would you be looking at their facial features when they're near men? Their body language? But facial features and body language can mean an array of things, what if they're shive…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 05:40 PM
0

We understand a demographics belief system based on self reporting, how else would we understand how people feel? Do you understand how studies work? Researchers do not just randomly think of a number and survey said number of people. The study I referenced was a quantitative research study which utilise a power analysis to identify the number of participants needed, this involves defining the statistical test that will be used, the significance level, the statistical power needed and the effect…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 05:14 PM
1

How is the study dishonest and in what way was it debunked? I work in research and I have two psychology degrees, the study seems to be very thoroughly done to me. It has been published so it was peer reviewed which ensures the scientific evidence is reliable and credible, the sample size is large and diverse and they encompass a multitude of beliefs... It was also a new study, published at the end of 2023 🤷 Also, I find it interesting how you ignored every single example I gave you after the st…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 05:03 PM
-7

It is a myth that feminists hate men - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03616843231202708 The feminist groups and organisations I have mentioned are literally supporting and helping men, isn't that evidence enough that they don't hate men? Why would a feminist group help men avoid the draft in Russia if they hated men? Why would there be multiple feminist groups dedicated to helping men if they hated them? The National Organisation for Men Against Sexism is a feminist organisation d…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 04:39 PM
-2

My point is we don't know who it is because reddit is anonymous.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:52 PM
-2

I'm not going to act like all feminists are perfect and none of them have ever said anything negative, that would be ridiculous. There are numerous branches of feminism that are drastically different from one another. For example, radical feminism believes that transwomen are directly harming women and equality in general whereas intersectional feminism includes trans women and disagrees with the idea that they're harming women and equality. I suppose that's what annoys me about the 'feminism is…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:04 PM
-16

Because looking at what comments on reddit get upvoted is an accurate way to determine the opinion of feminists. 1) You have no idea who is upvoting or making said comments, reddit is an anonymous platform and 2) there is a clear difference between reddit feminists and actual feminists As well as that, people in this sub don't actually care. There are many many feminists that invoke positive change like the feminist group in Russia helping men to avoid the draft, like the feminist group MenEngag…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 02:00 PM
1

I doubt it tbh, many women in my generation are moving away from more traditional goals i.e kids and marriage. and are focusing on their careers more
/r/MensRights22/09/25 10:25 AM
-2

I'm a man in my early twenties and I date casually, not for marriage or children and so do the vast majority of women I encounter 🤷
/r/MensRights22/09/25 10:06 AM
0

Ah thank u for linking the thread, I was going to but no idea how ✌️ Essentially, I said that due to your comments in that thread, I won’t be engaging in conversation with you any longer. What you said was truly disgusting and I would recommend for you to step back from Reddit and to heal. I wish you the best
/r/MensRights22/09/25 08:29 AM
-7

This is genuinely a ridiculous statement, there are many women that don’t want children and there are many women that don’t want to get married.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 07:12 AM
-5

Well, I'm British which is why I mentioned the UK since you didn't specify what country you were talking about. After a quick google, it seems like it is fairly similar to the UK, both parents income is considered, number of children etc. it differs from state to state though so it is difficult to provide a straight answer. I looked at Florida though and it is exactly the same as the UK, the highest the paying parent is required to give is 19% of their gross weekly income (this is for 3+ childre…
/r/MensRights21/09/25 08:28 PM
13

Actually there are many films and series (both fictional and non fictional) about male film makers and their struggle in the industry 🤷 https://www.imdb.com/list/ls050602391/
/r/MensRights21/09/25 08:12 PM
-4

Child support is based on the paying parents gross weekly income, number of children they have and the children living situation i.e how many days they're living with the receiving parent vs the paying parent. In the UK, the highest child support the paying parent would be required to pay is 19% of their gross weekly income (this is for 3 children or more). The average gross weekly income in the UK is £722 for full time employees, 19% of that is £137.18, that is the highest amount the receiving …
/r/MensRights21/09/25 07:52 PM
-10

If two adults consensually have a child together then said adults should financially provide for their child regardless of whether either parent could meet the financial needs on their own or not. If you don't want to raise a child then don't have children.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 03:07 PM
1

Sure, let’s generalise a huge group of people and say they’re terrible at science because that makes total sense
/r/MensRights21/09/25 09:51 AM
-1

lol I wish I was as delusional as u, seems like a blissful life
/r/MensRights20/09/25 06:55 PM
-2

You're very welcome to dismiss what I say mate, it is just something I have seen on this sub and I don't particularly care if u believe me or not 🤷
/r/MensRights20/09/25 06:45 PM
-1

Deflection? I just havent read the study mate, I just finished a taxing postgrad where I read hundreds of studies and I work as a research assistant where I read dozens of studies... Its a Saturday night, god forbid I dont wanna read more studies on the weekend Get back to me on Monday or something idk
/r/MensRights20/09/25 06:43 PM
-1

I don't keep a list of reddit links like u
/r/MensRights20/09/25 06:15 PM
-1

I asked a question that wasn't based on the specific research posted, just regarding something I have noticed in this sub regarding research in general. I haven't read this specific paper so therefore can't address it
/r/MensRights20/09/25 06:14 PM
-1

Never said there was a problem with pointing out methodological issues within the study, simply said I have seen people in this sub disregard studies solely because they disagree with the results and claim the studies are 'feminist'
/r/MensRights20/09/25 06:12 PM
-7

I understand disregarding studies based on poor methodology but my point was that many users here seem to disregard studies solely on whether they agree with the results or not
/r/MensRights20/09/25 04:21 PM
-26

I don't really understand why you're bringing up this study that is completely irrelevant to the subject, I know practically nothing about the topic so why would I ever try to credit or discredit it? Also odd that after I replied, you edited the comment linking an amazon book and a knock off wiki page, one source that I am not going to pay to read and another source that talks about posts made on reddit by some random person? Gonna end this exchange here, you're quite an odd person
/r/MensRights20/09/25 12:14 PM
-30

I can't really comment on it, the paper is over a decade old and therefore would be considered outdated and avoided by academics + I know very little about the endosymbiotic theory 🤷 You didn't answer my question
/r/MensRights20/09/25 11:54 AM
-33

If you agreed with the research, would you have left this comment? What I have found in this subreddit is that individuals will 100% use studies and research that agree with them to back up their point BUT will disregard any study that opposes their beliefs due to it being 'feminist'
/r/MensRights20/09/25 11:45 AM
1

Tried to send a link but it got auto removed 🤷 it’s quite easily found on the sub tho
/r/MensRights19/09/25 08:05 AM
0

You conveniently left out the part of the post that mentioned how the boys touched the lifeguards breasts, that is 100% sexual assault and it is wrong regardless of their age. Especially since they harassed her after and kept asking her on a date.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 09:32 PM
0

Yeah, i've debunked your evidence multiple times yet you cling to it despite it not even saying what you think it says. I am now completely over debunking any evidence from you because you don't care about the actual context, you only care about your interpretation 🤷 ironic that you are trying to say that I dismiss evidence though lmao It isn't ageist to acknowledge that you're quite a bit older than me which would therefore potentially impact your views lol I have spoken about the Duluth model …
/r/MensRights18/09/25 01:51 PM
-1

You're extremely paranoid and hostile, I wasn't trying to do a 'gotcha' or anything like that, I was simply asking because you have a completely distorted view of feminism and I was wondering where that came from. Also, not exactly funny that I was asking for sources, how was I supposed to know that you're quite older? Makes sense though, the sources you have stated are outdated in comparison to current feminist frameworks and are really only valuable in learning about the history of digital fem…
/r/MensRights18/09/25 12:51 PM
-2

You did not answer my questions from yesterday and I will not be reading your comments or answering your points until you do. 'I do have a question though, you have stated multiple times that you are a 'former feminist', what branch of feminism did you identify with and what feminist literature within said branch made you originally identify with that branch?'
/r/MensRights18/09/25 11:27 AM
-4

Some women do believe in gendered stereotypes for both genders, yes. Conservative/ trad women are likely to believe in conforming to gendered stereotypes for both men and women. Women who identify as feminists though believe in dismantling all gendered stereotypes for both men and women.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 09:08 AM
-4

This is just sexist.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 07:32 AM
0

There 100% are issues with the prison system, women are often infantilised and given lesser sentences which is why I believe in reform as well as for other reasons within the justice system. I'm not going to argue with you about whether prison abolishment is the correct stance, I respect your beliefs and I do understand why people are in favour of prison abolishment. I personally just don't subscribe to that idea 🤷 I do have a question though, you have stated multiple times that you are a 'forme…
/r/MensRights17/09/25 06:51 PM
0

No, I am not a prison abolitionist for either gender. I believe that if someone commits a crime and is found guilty of said crime then they should face the consequence in line with said crime 🤷 Whether that is community service, incarceration, fines etc. I do, however, believe that the justice system does need reform and it should be focused on rehabilitation. Are you a prison abolitionist?
/r/MensRights17/09/25 04:35 PM
0

I am not a prison abolitionist, while I believe that the prison system needs reform and should focus on rehabilitation, I also believe that people who are found guilty of a crime should be sentenced and incarcerated.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 03:53 PM
-2

Masculinity is simply defined as traits that we stereotypically attribute to men and boys. For example, courage, confidence, leadership, financial success etc. these traits are not inherent to men and women can also possess said traits, they're just stereotypically associated with masculinity and do not have a basis in biology. There are a multitude of cultures outside of the west that view masculinity and femininity differently, the Wodaabe people in Niger link masculinity to beauty and perform…
/r/MensRights17/09/25 12:32 PM
-1

100%, masculinity and femininity are social constructs that have no basis in biology. This is why we see different cultures that have completely different definitions of masculinity and femininity compared to the west.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 10:03 AM
2

Brilliant, thank you for listening to me despite the pushback my comments received in this thread. Good luck with the video
/r/MensRights17/09/25 08:41 AM
-1

I simply said the UK stats because that’s where I’m from and I am most familiar with the system here compared to the us
/r/MensRights16/09/25 08:15 PM
1

I just told you, I'm not gonna sit here and teach you basic media literacy and the only way to improve your reading comprehension skills is to read more...
/r/MensRights16/09/25 06:28 PM
1

I am definitely not advocating for the UK to adopt the American prison system, absolutely not. I do, however, believe that the UK does need to have serious reform regarding the prison system as well as sentencing. I advocate for a rehabilitation focused system. Also, the justice system disagrees with you, the maximum sentence for rape is life and I completely agree with that. I think it is disgusting how you are downplaying the serious effects of rape, the emotional damage is severe and leads ma…
/r/MensRights16/09/25 06:21 PM
1

It isn't about subjective judgement, it is about using critical reading comprehension skills and possessing a good level of media literacy to be able to understand when the media is weaponising specific content to gain more views.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 05:49 PM
-5

The average sentence for rape is 4-19 years in the UK, if we look at the lightest average sentence (4 years) and how the majority don't even serve full time, rapists absolutely serve 2 years in prison on average in many cases. The UK seriously needs to get stricter on rape and sexual assault for both men and women, the sentencing is ridiculously light.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 05:18 PM
0

I'm actually against the sex industry. Its basic media literacy, the media weaponises specific aspects of the content to draw attention and to get more clicks. Are you trying to say that the media is 100% in the titles all the time and they do not have an ulterior motive? aka to gain more views You're extremely naive if you believe the media is always honest and always seeks to present stories in an unbiased light.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 09:38 AM
0

It's the media, the majority of titles weaponise some aspect of the content in order to draw people in. Even clickbait can be considered weaponising specific aspects of the content to gain more views. Basic media literacy.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 09:35 AM
-21

The media often weaponises/ emphasises job titles when reporting crimes to reinforce social bias, to draw attention to perceived contradictions in the persons behaviour and their job title, sensationalism etc. This is seen when individuals with high profiles commit a crime i.e doctors, lawyers, judges. adult content creators, individuals with 'working class' jobs etc. We probably wouldn't have this discussion if an author committed a crime and this was emphasised by the media but we absolutely s…
/r/MensRights15/09/25 07:21 PM
1

Tbf I never pay with cash and this is a guess but I would say that the majority of younger people just use Apple Pay or some form of digital payment 🤷 I agree though, doesn’t seem relevant to this sub
/r/MensRights15/09/25 03:42 PM
1

Absolutely, my great grandmother found a partner in her 80s 🤷
/r/MensRights15/09/25 07:42 AM
1

Ok, so you don't understand what a social construct is and how they interact with reality. Gonna end this convo here then because you're simply not educated enough, have a nice day.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 05:46 PM
1

I think values differ from person to person. Some individuals do not want children so therefore fertility wouldn't be a huge thing for them 🤷 Also, 16-25 year olds are statistically diagnosed with the most mental disorders.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 05:30 PM
1

They don't exist in objective reality, no. That's why they're social constructs, masculinity and femininity are both concepts that people collectively agree exist and therefore give meaning to. Social constructs are not false, they exist in our reality due to collective agreement, they're just distinctly different from naturally existing phenomenons. For example, it is an objective reality that I have brown hair, it is a measurable trait that can be physically witnessed. However, social construc…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 05:16 PM
-2

Of course they're gender neutral, anyone can display either masculine or feminine traits. They're simply negative stereotypes associated with traditional masculinity, which is why the term is 'toxic masculinity'. Saying that a trait is stereotypically masculine does not mean that most/ all women cannot display said trait. They absolutely can and do, the traits are just stereotypically associated with masculinity. Not sure why you're having such a hard time understanding stereotypes
/r/MensRights14/09/25 04:57 PM
0

It varies depending on what culture you're looking at, masculinity is a social construct as is femininity 🤷 Masculinity are just traits/ stereotypes that are commonly associated with men and boys, it's very much up for interpretation. I suppose you could say that being confident is a positive masculine trait as it is stereotypically associated with masculinity in western culture
/r/MensRights14/09/25 04:48 PM
-2

He’s obviously talking to women in his age range, why would a middle aged man want to be in a relationship with someone around 20- 30 years younger than him??
/r/MensRights14/09/25 04:07 PM
1

You can repeat that as much as you like, placing the sole blame and responsibility on one gender is never going to solve the issue when both genders perpetuate said gendered stereotypes. Especially when said stereotypes are perpetuated in a multitude of areas i.e societal expectations, the media, work places etc. Harmful gendered stereotypes need to be deconstructed on a systemic level, not by placing the blame on women and telling them to fix it. That is genuinely ridiculous and would not solve…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 03:04 PM
0

I believe men and women are conditioned through societal expectations of what masculinity should look like which perpetuates harmful gendered stereotypes and causes both men and women to internalise said stereotypes and to enforce them. Both men and women need to address this. This post has nothing to do with toxic femininity which is why I haven't mentioned it.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:51 PM
-8

That has nothing to do with my comment
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:48 PM
2

I completely disagree, the term 'toxic masculinity' simply refers to harmful attitudes and behaviours that are stereotypically associated with traditional masculinity. It isn't meant to link masculinity as a whole to toxicity, individuals who are misinformed on the term are the ones who make this incorrect connection and who then spread this misinformation which others begin to parrot. The actual term is not discriminatory or unhelpful, it is incredibly important to point out harmful gendered st…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:48 PM
-18

Again, toxic masculinity is rooted in negative stereotypes associated with traditional masculinity such as aggression. I am not making any comparison, I am not saying that men are more or less aggressive than women. I am simply telling you the definition of toxic masculinity and what is included in said definition. You're putting a significant amount of blame on women for said stereotypes, both men and women perpetuate gendered stereotypes. The solution is never to place all the blame on one gen…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:33 PM
-3

Well, no. It is just a complete misunderstanding of the term used as a 'gotcha' 🤷 Just reads as misinformed and rage baity
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:27 PM
-13

Both men and women can and do perpetuate gendered stereotypes such as men suppressing their emotions. Said stereotypes should be deconstructed but it is completely unproductive to blame one gender for the existence of this stereotype, men also perpetuate it by calling men who express emotions weak and unmanly. Obviously, disciplining children in an appropriate way is perfectly fine and it is not considered aggression when referring to aggressive traits in some men. Being violent and abusive is a…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:20 PM
-50

This comment fundamentally misunderstands what toxic masculinity is. Masculinity isn't inherently toxic but specific traits associated with traditional masculinity are i.e suppressing emotions, aggression etc. Children are not better off without fathers but I would argue that they are better off without an aggressive father that suppresses his emotions.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 01:41 PM
6

Why do you follow people on insta you don’t like? Other than Reddit, my social media ONLY has people I like on it because who wants to get annoyed every single time they open insta or tik tok or whatever 🤷
/r/MensRights13/09/25 07:50 PM
-1

I think “shunning people” based on a disagreement in politics is completely acceptable. It isn’t just a disagreement, it is a contrast in morals. Obviously, politicians shouldn’t shun the opposing side because we need that dialogue but the average person? They’re completely entitled to surround themselves with whoever they choose
/r/MensRights13/09/25 10:54 AM
0

I am an avid gamer, I own 4 consoles and a plethora of games + game pass ultimate. I haven't noticed what you are saying at all, what I have noticed though is an increased recognition of women gamers and therefore games are made in a more inclusive way to include this demographic. What I have noticed is many male gamers have struggled with a more inclusive version of games, it is a well recorded fact that there is an issue with sexism within the gaming community so when games include a mc that h…
/r/MensRights13/09/25 10:12 AM
0

No one is saying that games should be all about women? They're just trying to include a huge percentage of their consumers.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 09:34 AM
1

On the collective shout website, they have mentioned Roblox stating that it isn't safe for children and they have spoken about getting 20,000 games banned that have themes of rape, incest and child abuse. That's it. Do you have a problem with games that have such graphic content being banned? Wouldn't you say that is a good thing??
/r/MensRights13/09/25 09:34 AM
-18

While it is true that more women exclusively play mobile games compared to men, that still doesn’t exclude the huge percentage of women that play console/ PC
/r/MensRights12/09/25 10:11 AM
-26

Many of the posts are about gaming, how is gaming a male hobby when roughly half of gamers are women?? Edit: lol 20+ downvotes for pointing out that women also play games
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:53 AM
1

That’s ridiculous, not everyone wants children and not everyone should have children.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 07:40 AM
0

Bro I “admitted” nothing because I don’t do that, just pointing out how hypocritical it is of u to say
/r/MensRights11/09/25 07:13 AM
0

pot kettle
/r/MensRights10/09/25 08:34 PM
2

They don't aim not to expose anyone to said acts if they're doing them in public around non consenting people?
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:21 PM
5

Intentionally trying to expose individuals to sexual acts without their knowledge/ consent for sexual gratification is 100% predatory.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:17 PM
6

I get what you mean but I do think that is an insane mindset to have, basically 'do what you want as long as u don't get caught' like we have laws in place regarding public sexual activity for a reason
/r/MensRights10/09/25 04:26 PM
10

I'm not sure, people who do these acts in public usually do it for the thrill of exposing others unknowingly to sexual activity, for the thrill of possibly getting caught etc. There is usually an element that involves a non-consenting party and that is by definition predatory.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 04:15 PM
17

I agree with you except for that last part, no one should use sex toys in public.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 04:07 PM
-3

It is not 'male hate' to have a height preference.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 11:52 AM
-1

I have never said that women can’t be homophobic, they absolutely can be
/r/MensRights10/09/25 08:34 AM
1

Self reported studies are not inherently unreliable like you are trying to imply. A multitude of factors have to be considered such as the methodology of said study, whether concurrently validity has been found etc. I agree that self reported studies should not be solely used BUT when the same results have been consistently found + hate crime statistics also demonstrate the same answer, we can assume that the results of said self reported study are reliable.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 07:38 AM
-5

If you don’t believe in that statistic, let’s look at the demographic that commits hate crimes against the LGBTQ+ community the most then. …also men.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 07:24 AM
-19

That’s statistically not true, men consistently report higher levels of homophobia and women are more likely to be accepting of same sex relationships.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 07:16 AM
-24

No but you’re making out that it’s the vast majority of women and I disagree
/r/MensRights10/09/25 07:05 AM
-24

I disagree with this, as a bisexual man I have amazing friends who are women
/r/MensRights10/09/25 07:03 AM
2

You cannot prevent divorce, people grow apart sometimes for literally no reason, it just happens and people are no longer compatible. You are looking at it from a logical viewpoint despite it being a relationship that is built on emotions. You cannot control or prevent peoples emotions from changing.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 12:50 PM
1

"No conservatives?" Really? Really? You're THAT confident, that you can casually rule out up to 74% (depending on how conservative is "too conservative") of men without even engaging with them, before any of your other qualifiers are tacked on?" if you cannot read the tone in this sentence written by OP then 🤷
/r/MensRights08/09/25 09:33 PM
1

Let's not pretend there isn't a particular tone to the post.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 09:29 PM
5

Quite ironic how you're for the abolishment of divorce and then reference the evil that was done when divorce was illegal i.e. Henry 8th executing women. You don't have to split assets, that is why prenups exist. If two consenting adults have a child together, said adults should be legally required to provide for that child outside of extraneous circumstances.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 09:10 PM
4

You're wrong but even if you were right, the solution isn't to ban divorce, thats dystopian.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 09:00 PM
5

Relationships break down for a multitude of reasons. Relationships can break down for no particular reason, people just grow apart sometimes and are no longer compatible. Do you have no relationship experience? No experience in the real world?
/r/MensRights08/09/25 08:55 PM
6

If you don't think forcing people to stay married when they're unhappy is a disturbing idea then that is worrying. Also, banning things you personally find wrong i.e dating apps, 'attention farming algorithms' etc. is a ridiculous idea.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 08:50 PM
6

Disturbing suggestion
/r/MensRights08/09/25 05:38 PM
1

It isn't unreasonable to seek a partner with shared values as yourself. There's nothing wrong with women turning down conservative men because of this reason.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 04:21 PM
2

This is such a ridiculous post.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 11:46 AM
0

You’re right, men have been found guilty and then later found to be innocent. As I said, I would believe they’re guilty until evidence to the contrary says otherwise. I would rather believe a victim and be wrong than believe a rapist is innocent and be wrong.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 09:05 AM
0

If someone is found guilty in a court of law, I am going to assume they’re guilty unless evidence to the contrary is found.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 08:45 AM
0

It has nothing to do with comparisons, I am literally just thinking about how accidentally platforming guilty men could impact OP
/r/MensRights06/09/25 08:44 AM
-1

All I have suggested is that this person should use verified accounts of false accusations rather than going off anonymous stories on reddit. That is not infeasible, that is a sensible thing to do
/r/MensRights05/09/25 07:50 PM
-2

If you cannot see the potential issues with platforming men who claim to be falsely accused and taking what they say as completely true then you’re not thinking enough about it.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 07:19 PM
-1

If you want to do this documentary, I would focus on well known cases where it has been legally proven that the individual was falsely accused. Do not just take the word of random people on Reddit
/r/MensRights05/09/25 06:52 PM
4

I understand the sentiment and your positive reasoning for wanting to do this but this could backfire on you. You don't want to accidentally platform men who are claiming to be 'falsely accused' but they are, in fact, guilty. You are taking what they say as the truth and that is dangerous, please do your research behind the people you are planning to platform. Don't just take an individuals word as fact, that could be so damaging in so many different ways.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 10:25 AM
3

That’s not true actually, most women marry within their socioeconomic class. And even if it was true, it still isn’t a reason to force someone to stay married to you
/r/MensRights02/09/25 06:21 AM
1

Well, no. While women predominately sell sex, the actual people with power in the industry i.e porn directors, managers, agents etc, are men. So in that sense, women are the product and predominately men sell said product based on the demand from the consumers who are also typically men 🤷
/r/MensRights01/09/25 08:19 PM
1

Simply referring to prostitution and sex work, it is simply a fact that the consumer holds all the power 🤷 They have the money, supply and demand and all that. I wouldn't advise you or anyone else to do sex work when you're broke just btw, it can be really dangerous. No idea if you're joking or not but just to be clear, I do not condone it 💀 It is true though, Im 22 and conventionally attractive so I get spammed as soon as I open apps like Grindr for that type of thing.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 07:43 PM
9

What's wrong with no fault divorce? If someone no longer wants to be in a relationship with someone, why would you want to force them to stay?
/r/MensRights01/09/25 06:40 PM
5

Well, that is true for both men and women of course but I wouldn't value a woman based on her attractiveness
/r/MensRights01/09/25 05:00 PM
1

I disagree tbh, as a bisexual man, I get bombarded with messages from men asking to pay for sex on gay dating apps. I don't think it's really about 'easy access to free sex', a lot of people get off on paying for sex and would choose to over getting it for free. I think it's important to consider the power dynamic that exists when paying for sex, some people get off on holding money over others.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 04:59 PM
2

the 'wall' is 35?? That's insane.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 03:01 PM
-1

The demand def isn’t “too low/ non existent”, there are plenty of men wanting to pay for sex with other men 🤷 go for it
/r/MensRights01/09/25 12:23 PM
0

You said 'prostitutes' which commonly refers to 'streetwalkers', if you had said escorts then I wouldn't have been confused with what you were talking about. You weren't talking about the sex market in general, you were referring to prostitution which 100% is controlled by the consumers. Sex is the product being purchased, you would not argue that an apple controls the fruit market, the consumer controls said market due to supply and demand. Who are the women having sex with? In your scenario, 1…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 10:26 AM
-12

Prostitutes do not 'control the sex market', the people purchasing sex control it. The consumers. Prostitutes are usually drug addicts feeding their addiction, they're homeless and trying to get by, they're trying to survive. There genuinely is no difference, it's just about money. I simply said that men can be sex workers, which is true.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 10:08 AM
-22

Not at all, do you seriously think the women are attracted to the people they're having sex with? Absolutely not, it is just a way to get money, they aren't getting any type of pleasure out of it. As well as this, over half of female sex workers have had sexual relations with the same sex due to their work. There really is no difference.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 09:58 AM
-34

Nothing is stopping men from becoming male escorts 🤷 I never understand this sentiment that only women can be sex workers.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 08:47 AM
-16

I was actually only referring to the women are overprotected part in my comment, I made no comparison. BUT if you want a comparison that bad, misogyny is 100% worse than misandry. I mean, stop replying to literally every one of my comments within minutes and then I might stop accusing u of stalking my comments lmao I'm done responding to you in this thread now, cya 🫡
/r/MensRights31/08/25 01:33 PM
-18

What are you talking about?? When did I ever compare the sufferings of men and women? All I said was that women do suffer and they are not 'overprotected', that is an ignorant viewpoint. Now stop stalking my comments wth
/r/MensRights31/08/25 12:53 PM
1

lol so you admit that you had an issue with me questioning why someone would ignore the opinion of older women simply because of their gender and age and you knew the comment was edited. It isn't about granting a 'privilege; or 'revering their opinion', all I said was that it is odd to dismiss someone's opinion simply based on their age and gender, which it is. I would say the same thing if someone dismissed the opinion of an older man simply because of his age and gender, it's fucking weird eit…
/r/MensRights31/08/25 12:51 PM
0

It literally said edited above the comment and you replied to me before they edited it so you knew. This is just another example of you wanting to argue with me for no actual reason.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 12:44 PM
-1

...They edited it? I literally spoke to them, they told me that they missed a word off and apologised. Do not be condescending to me when you don't even know the full context, genius.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 12:40 PM
-23

Tell that to the women under Taliban rule. You sound insanely ignorant to the realities of women around the world.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 12:07 PM
-1

ah fair enough 🫡
/r/MensRights31/08/25 11:59 AM
-3

If you're disregarding the opinion of someone simply based on their gender and age then thats kind of odd and implies that you don't respect them based on said characteristics.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 11:55 AM
-2

Why don't the opinions of older women matter to the men in your friend group?
/r/MensRights31/08/25 11:50 AM
0

No one is when a dress code is implemented? Their outfit has to adhere to the dress code. Not sure what your point is
/r/MensRights29/08/25 07:27 PM
0

But it is the case? Work isn’t like school, most places either have a unisex uniform or they state that the dress code is smart business or whatever and as long as the outfit fits that category, it’s allowed. I work from home but dress code when I go in is completely casual 🤷
/r/MensRights29/08/25 07:16 PM
0

Not really, the dress code is usually stated as just business formal, smart business, smart casual etc etc. anything within that category is usually acceptable. Both men and women are able to wear whatever they like as long as it fits said dress code
/r/MensRights29/08/25 06:47 PM
-1

Why are you so angry over this? Honestly, is it such a huge deal? Women absolutely do dress appropriately for the workplace, both men and women have to meet the dress code implemented. It is simply a scientific fact that women get colder quicker than men, not because they 'can look cute', you're weird. "expose 40% of her chest'??? What are you talking about? Genuinely? Women have to follow the dress code of their work, they aren't walking around with their breasts out. Have you ever worked a day…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 03:51 PM
1

I agree, this person is being ridiculous. I don’t think the heating is even that much of an issue, it really isn’t a big deal to compromise on heating in an office.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:39 PM
-1

Men could also bring their comfort level up by removing jackets, jumpers etc. and wearing lighter clothing. The argument you’re trying to make can be made regarding both men and women. Anyway, I don’t think the heating at work is such an issue, I don’t think it’s hostile or devaluing to compromise on said heating either though.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:38 PM
1

Legal consequences are not shaming if said person hasn’t been through the consequences. It is an explanation of the consequences. Obviously, right from wrong is more nuanced than the law. It was an example to demonstrate how the majority of people do not require shaming to stop them from doing wrong.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:09 PM
0

…I agree that bringing a jacket is sensible? There is an argument to be made though that currently, the heat is at a level that reduces one groups comfort despite acceptable dress. So, would it be so bad to compromise on it slightly to increase said groups comfort but still make sure the other group is comfortable?
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:07 PM
1

Yes, and the majority of people do not have a criminal record and therefore did not require shaming to not break the law… they were educated and explained why breaking the law is wrong. Way to miss my point.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:56 PM
-1

I totally agree, the vast amount of workplaces employ a professional dress code. Women do not show up to work wearing practically nothing, thats an insane take. I do think that the workplace should be a comfortable place for women so compromising slightly on the heating isn't the end of the world like OP is trying to make out. But I do agree, bringing a jacket to work when it is cold is common sense. The men at your work missed out on the lavender jacket, their loss 🤚
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:49 PM
0

When has that ever worked? That is literally how people learn and process right from wrong. The majority of people do not have a criminal record, why? Because they were explained why the behaviour isn't socially acceptable and the consequences of said actions. If shaming was the better way, the majority of people would have a criminal record because they would have had to break the law and be shamed for that behaviour to learn. That isn't the case.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:42 PM
1

That isn't explaining why the behaviour is wrong.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:17 PM
-5

Skimpy clothes? How did you even reach that conclusion? "The reason women might find themselves reaching for a sweater more often than men can be summed up in two words: metabolic rate." "Basically, men generate their own little heat islands, kind of like walking space heaters,” Dr. Danoff says. “But since women typically have less muscle mass and evaporate less heat through the pores in their skin, they might feel colder than men in a room with the same air temperature" https://findado.osteopat…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 12:10 PM
2

You realise you're completely contracting yourself, right? "Nowhere did I state that it was a universal red flag." and right after "It's an advance warning of a certain type of behaviour.", that is therefore a universal red flag since you believe an alternative style is an inherent warning to said behaviour. I am not trying to impose my beliefs, as I have stated, there is nothing wrong with having a preference BUT when you begin to deem your preferences as universally correct and anything outsid…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 11:37 AM
2

No, you are actually telling people that it sends a particular message and enforcing your belief that it is a red flag. For example, no one mentioned alternative styles, you mentioned that completely unprovoked i.e imposing what you consider shameful onto others. I am not going to respect what you are saying when you are policing how people express themselves by stating it is a universal red flag and you are calling literal children hybrids and mongrels. That is disgusting and does not deserve a…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 11:20 AM
1

Considering how I am getting downvoted, I think its too late lmao
/r/MensRights29/08/25 11:07 AM
2

You absolutely are implying that it is owed through your language, you are saying it is a red flag and something to be avoided therefore implying that a style you deem good is the only acceptable form of expression. It is completely understandable if a more alternative style isn't something you like but that does not make the style an inherent 'red flag'. You are 100% allowed to have preferences but when you begin to deem anything outside of your preference as a universal red flag then that is t…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 11:05 AM
1

"female modesty"? No one owes you a particular style for 'modesty', women with those attributes have been some of the nicest people I know who are passionate about their interests. Also it is disgusting how you refer to blended families, calling children 'mongrels' is shocking. I come from a blended family, my mother has children with two men and my father has children with two women, sometimes relationships don't work out and thats ok. Try not to be so judgemental and do not use that type of la…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 09:55 AM
0

That's... a lot. Question, what's wrong with dyed hair, tattoos and piercings?
/r/MensRights29/08/25 09:29 AM
7

I think if people are acting in a way that is “socially unacceptable”, explaining why their behaviour isn’t ok is a much better tactic than shaming.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 08:33 AM
0

It would not be homophobia if I joked about rejecting men. I agree that many gay and bisexual men do have internalised homophobia but a simple joke about rejecting men would not constitute as such.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 01:48 PM
2

I think laws provide a basis for morality in society, without said laws, I do think that a higher percentage of people would commit harm towards others due to the lack of socialisation regarding what we perceive as right or wrong. For example, the average British person would perceive laws stripping rights away from women as abhorrent and actively causing harm to women. However, individuals in Yemen are more likely to agree with said laws and would argue that it doesn't cause harm due to being r…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 11:31 AM
-1

Right, yes. Out of context links, how will I EVER argue against those. People only need to read the threads to see you’re lying, you know they won’t so I understand why you continuously misrepresent me to make your point stronger. I could totally post resources but that isn’t my responsibility, I am not a “MRA”, I believe this ideology is completely counterproductive to dealing with issues men face. I take my advocacy offline and actually publish academic research to help men, Reddit isn’t advoc…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 08:32 AM
-2

Even though I’ve always said that men’s issues are important and this sub needs to dedicate more time to ACTUAL resources to help men rather than posting stupid stuff like tik tok jokes. But sure, let’s cry about harmless jokes made on tik tok instead.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:53 AM
-20

This tik tok is not bigotry 💀 Would it be bigotry if I, as a bisexual man, said that my favourite hobby was rejecting other men? Am I suddenly being bigoted to men AND the LGBTQ+ community? OR is it a harmless joke about dating culture?
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:46 AM
-1

Your misunderstanding of feminism is coming through again.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:41 AM
-20

Because being bigoted to LGBTQ+ individuals is the same as posting a joke about rejecting men as a woman who is attracted to men. Not even comparable. Are you seriously offended by this? Do you keep the same energy for men who joke about rejecting women? I genuinely couldn’t care less either way because other people’s love lives have nothing to do with me AND harmless jokes are fine.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:40 AM
-5

Lesbians are not trying to destroy heterosexual relationships 💀 lesbians actually seek to decentre men from their lives so why exactly would they focus on this?
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:33 AM
-19

It’s clearly a joke meant to rage bait lmao and even if it wasn’t, who cares? Genuinely, women and men are entitled to reject anyone for ANY reason
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:31 AM
1

Jesus, educate yourself.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 04:37 PM
1

No, you asked for 'anti-feminist' music, not pro equality.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 04:20 PM
1

This is genuinely such a ridiculous post. Seb Low - Dogs & Cats Paris Paloma - Labour
/r/MensRights27/08/25 03:44 PM
-1

I think a multitude of factors go into dating profiles and whether or not you're going to get likes. I have always had a positive experience on apps with women which have resulted in amazing relationships + friendships and I'm not super tall or rich or whatever. I'm on a dating app now and I currently have 99+ likes and 31 messages 🤷 I think it is more so just based on the individual rather than an issue with people being shallow on apps which I would argue is more so based on location.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 10:43 AM
0

The onision thing was crazy, I still cannot get over him calling the police because Chris Hansen was outside his house 💀
/r/MensRights25/08/25 05:13 PM
-10

As someone who is alternative, I think the community is quite hyperaware of this type of behaviour and is therefore quick to call out any behaviour that could be considered questionable I think this is due to the mountain of alt musicians, YouTubers etc. that have faced accusations and/ or convictions for abusive behaviour: Dahvie Vanity, Austin Jones, Onision, Social Repose, Boyinaband, Joel Faviere, Marilyn Manson, Bryan Stars etc. I don't agree with throwing serious accusations around at all,…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 09:26 AM
0

My only contribution? Right, reddit is not a 'contribution to gender politics', it is a contribution to an online conversation surrounding a topic, it is in no way a contribution to gender politics. It is a social media platform. My actual contribution to gender politics lies in the research I have published and the research I am currently working on. This subreddit is an echo chamber in which outside opinions are ignored and attacked. You are a prime example of this, your entire comment history…
/r/MensRights24/08/25 11:11 AM
-1

Are you essentially saying that if I haven’t done something during my short time on Reddit, 3 months, then I have never done it and I am a liar?
/r/MensRights24/08/25 10:23 AM
-1

To anyone who needs to hear it.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 09:00 AM
-2

It's called internalised misogyny, both men and women hold up gender roles/ stereotypes, beauty standards etc.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 04:40 PM
-1

Again, if two groups are simultaneously struggling, even if it is just speculation that one group is struggling, shouldn’t we address both problems? To avoid them becoming bigger? As a society, shouldn’t we address both?
/r/MensRights23/08/25 10:05 AM
-3

Do you acknowledge that two groups can struggle simultaneously even if one group is still outperforming the other. And you do think that society in general should attempt to address both issues rather than focusing on one issue at a time?
/r/MensRights23/08/25 09:31 AM
-11

Did you read the article? The first line is acknowledging that girls outperform boys. It is focusing on how girls have higher rates of mental health disorders, are more likely to be absent from school than boys, have sleep issues etc. Two things can be true at once which the article acknowledges. Boys AND girls can both struggle simultaneously in different areas.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 08:23 PM
-6

Overwhelmingly prefer females? 56.5% choose male embryos, it’s fairly even with a slight preference for boys. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339188/
/r/MensRights22/08/25 04:45 PM
1

I agree with you that this pressure exists, 100%. Like I said previously, gender roles aren't dismantled quickly, they take time. People are advocating for breaking down gender roles that negatively impact men such as being a provider, as I have demonstrated, resulting in more women working, contributing equally to the household etc. This is directly challenging that stereotype of men being providers That's literally all I am saying, that I agree with you that this still negatively impacts men b…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 02:23 PM
1

https://ifamagazine.com/how-real-couples-in-the-uk-manage-money-revealed/ "New research from ClearScore finds that just 2 in 5 (40%) couples are splitting bills proportionate to income – with the majority (51%) splitting everything 50/50"
/r/MensRights22/08/25 01:52 PM
-4

They're entering the workforce for financial independence which in turn removes men from the 'provider' role. Did you miss my entire point? Feminists are removing the expectation that men are meant to provide by dismantling gender roles for both men and women, which is why women are entering the workforce and even outperforming men, the expectation that a man will provide is directly being challenged through this. What do you think a two income household means? It is a household in which two par…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 01:37 PM
-7

This post completely contradicts itself. Yes, there is a societal expectation that men should be the 'providers', this is due to gender roles that are placed onto men. Feminists are challenging this expectation which is why women are encouraged to go to work, contribute to the household etc. explaining why so many households are two incomes, along with socioeconomic factors. Feminists are constantly discussing how women should not rely on a man, how it is actually dangerous to rely on anyone fin…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 01:09 PM
-1

Didn’t have to dig deep, literally one google search. If that’s “digging deep” to you then it makes sense why you rely on your anecdotal experience over actual facts. 95%? Let’s not make up percentages to make your position sound more legit. The fact is actual feminist organisations are helping both men and women, as I have demonstrated, yet you want to focus on online feminist spaces and on comments that may or may not be written by someone who even identifies as a feminist.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 08:42 AM
-1

Because it’s a broad framework that isn’t just based on individual incidents, it’s based on structural inequality and patterns of harm. Men receive the exact same support and acknowledgement as female victims through this framework.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 07:04 AM
-1

No, the VWAG is a broad framework that encompasses male and female victims, it does not record male victims of violence as female victims. It still records them as male.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 09:07 PM
0

Male victims of violence are grouped into a broader framework called 'Violence against Women and Girls', yes. I understand how this may appear exclusionary at first but the UK government recognises that men and boys can be victims of violence and they are supported by said framework. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supporting-male-victims/supporting-male-victims-accessible https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supporting-male-victims I do agree that the definition of rape in the …
/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:55 PM
0

You're blatantly wrong. Patriarchy is not a model, it is a sociological concept that explains a social system in which positions of power are primarily held by men. The Duluth model is a patriarchal framework, frameworks are continually refined and developed upon and has been replaced with The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 which is gender neutral. Some perpetrator programmes and community responses draw from some aspects of the Duluth Model but they still encompass a gender neutral approach, as define…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:46 PM
-4

They're incomparable. The patriarchy is a social system. The Duluth model is a framework created to understand and address domestic violence. Frameworks are continually refined through new research and new understanding which is why it would be reductionist to focus on a 40 year old model when more comprehensive and updated models have been developed i.e The Domestic Abuse Act 2021. There is no comparison between a sociological concept used to understand broader patterns in society and a specifi…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:18 PM
-7

So they do admit there are biological differences and your post is purposefully misleading. So, what they were essentially saying is that men and women are socialised differently, which is true, and therefore develop differences due to said socialisation, which is also true. Can you at least link the podcast and episode so people can actually research what you're saying?
/r/MensRights20/08/25 09:21 AM
-12

Right so you're wrong. The Duluth model was developed in the early 1980's, while aspects of the model are used such as coordinated community responses and intervention programs for perpetrators, the UK has adapted a more nuanced approach to domestic violence such as the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 which uses gender neutral terms while defining abuse and acknowledges that victims can be of any gender. Policy and research develops over time, let's not fixate on a 40 year old model. Men are more likely…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 09:01 AM
-17

Reciprocal abuse does not exist, it is a reaction to being abused. For example, if you punched me and I defended myself by pushing you away, we would not both be charged with assault. That is why the law takes into consideration self defence rather than simply saying both parties assaulted each other. information on mutual/ reactive abuse: https://nationallegalservice.co.uk/what-is-reactive-abuse/ https://www.thehotline.org/resources/mutual-abuse-its-not-real/#:~:text=But%20%22mutual%20abuse%22%…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:55 AM
0

Translation: There are no feminist organisation that say that and I have gotten my information based on my anecdotal experiences in 'feminist spaces' and have based my opinion on individual people from said spaces that may or may not even identify as feminists. Can you name any organisations that actively oppose sending women to prison? I looked into the case in Rome about the 'victim support centre', I found one article in Italian which I translated over. Feminists were not mentioned directly b…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 09:03 PM
1

https://www.dw.com/en/feminist-group-in-russia-helping-men-dodge-conscription/a-63509559 - feminist group against male conscription and helping male soldiers to avoid it in Russia Can you name one feminist organisation that is actively for women being abusive towards men? If the vast majority of feminists believe that then it should not be difficult for you to find ONE legit feminist organisation that advocates for the abuse of men by women. http://www.rebeccasteinfeld.com/2015/01/hysteria-male-…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 06:32 PM
1

Primarily the general budget of the EU
/r/MensRights19/08/25 06:20 PM
-1

Again, the source I shared specifically said 'sexual assault and rape', it didn't influence how the data was presented or the narrative because it clearly stated that it didn't just include rape statistics. It isnt a methodological issue when the definition used is clearly defined, it would be a methodological issue if it only said rape and then used sexual assault cases, but it didn't. It specifically said both, therefore making the definition used clearly defined and not an issue. Your point d…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:52 PM
0

The skittles metaphor was demonising refugees as a whole, I did not demonise men but rather put into context why women are fearful due to the statistical risk and unpredictability. It was discussing why being cautious is rational, it was not a point about men being excluded from society. It is also important to add that men are, on a whole, stronger than women and therefore are a potential threat. They may look structurally similar but the context and purpose behind each statement is clearly wid…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 07:32 AM
-1

What are you talking about? I haven't claimed anything about NOW, ironically, this is exactly that the gish Gallop technique is. Expect all evidence to be debunked and if not, accuse the person of denying said 'evidence'. Sorry, just going to edit this slightly, I did offer to debunk a link for you but I have decided that there is no point. I have debunked many links and studies that you have sent and your overwhelming reaction was '...nope, still going to use it anyway', you don't care about th…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 09:44 PM
0

It is a fact that more women work within the field of gender equality, I am all for more men entering this industry but there is a common belief in many male spaces that gender studies shouldn't be a thing. instead of this rhetoric, we should encourage men to enter this field, 100%. Again, due to more women working in this sector, more women are likely to be senior public officials or experts in gender equality, human rights etc. so therefore, countries are more likely to nominate a woman, purel…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 09:40 PM
-1

You understand that being 1st on the gender equality index does not mean that the country is literally equal in every single way, right? You don't have that much of a black and white view, right? Sweden has a score of 82.2/100 in relation to equality. It is still first. You know that very few people are going to go through every single link and fact check them. It's called a gish gallop rhetorical technique. During a debate, an individual will overload their opponent with an excessive amount of …
/r/MensRights18/08/25 09:30 PM
-1

You think referencing sexual assault statistics in relation to feeling scared about being alone with a strange man in the middle of the woods, is the same as spreading hatred and xenophobia towards refugees on a national scale? That is the position you're taking?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 09:17 PM
-1

The organisation has one director, a woman, I don't see why the gender of the director is relevant to this conversation, would it make a difference to you if the director was a man? And if so, why? The core body of the organisation is made up of 18 representatives from the member of state who are nominated by each participating EU state. Those that are nominated are often senior public officials or experts in gender equality, human rights, social affairs etc. Due to their expertise in the area, …
/r/MensRights18/08/25 09:15 PM
0

The European Institute for Gender Equality.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:59 PM
-1

I'm not a liberal feminist and no, it is nothing like that metaphor. Donald Trump Jr. tweeted that to inspire hatred towards refugees. I provided an example to elicit empathy towards women who have experienced sexual assault and to put into context the men vs bear conversation i.e. why women wouldn't want to be alone with a strange man in the woods, it has nothing to do with men in a larger context.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:58 PM
-5

Doesn't this post shut your claim down? Sweden, with a feminist government, is 1st in the Gender Equality Index. Also, the 'examples' in that comment are either individual women, many of which don't even identify as feminists, or extremely easily refutable or have literally nothing to do with feminism. Have you researched every individual link in that comment?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:52 PM
-12

Spain also ranks incredibly high in the Gender Equality Index, ranking 4th as of 2024. Bad example.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:46 PM
-11

It is an unfounded claim to say that a self identified feminist government has had a hand in the gender equality we see in Sweden? A government that pushes policies that aim to reduce gender inequality and therefore having an impact on Swedens rank in the Gender Equality Index? Obviously, it's always more nuanced than saying one specific thing is the one and only cause, I'm not saying that. But it would also be silly to ignore the positive impact that a feminist government has had in increasing …
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:44 PM
-20

The Swedish government has historically supported feminist policies with a focus on intersectionality. Despite what many people here want to believe, feminism IS beneficial for society and for both men and women. https://www.gendersecurityproject.com/feminist-foreign-policy-countries/sweden https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Initiatives/StepItUp/Commitments-Speeches/Sweden-StepItUp-CommitmentText-201509-en.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism_in_Sweden
/r/MensRights18/08/25 06:41 PM
1

I'm not sure what your point is, I never referenced rape, I said sexual assault and the statistics I presented say sexual assault AND rape. Sexual assault IS an umbrella term for anything deemed 'unwanted sexual contact or behaviour' so of course it is going to include all types of sexual assault. Maybe you would have a point if I specifically said just rape but I didn't and neither do the statistics I presented. Edit: Just thought Id also add that isn't a methodological issue either since what …
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:19 PM
-4

I'm sick of it being continuously misrepresented and portrayed as women just hating on men. Like this post for example, an entire essay completely misinterpreting the entire conversation and painting women as essentially delusional. If they went into a restaurant and they were told that some of the food is poisonous, they don't know which food though and 1 in 4 people who had eaten in said restaurant had reported being poisoned, they would not eat at the restaurant despite the majority of the fo…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 03:06 PM
-4

It is not insulting the intelligence of anyone here to correct OP who blatantly said that adolescence is based on a true event which is untrue. Red pill ideology is a gateway towards far right extremism and misogynistic views which is what adolescence portrayed. There is also several documentaries about misogyny and Islam as well as many documentaries discussing radicalisation. Not sure why you even mentioned islam and what that has to do with the topic though.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 02:37 PM
-6

Adolescence was not based on a true story, it was inspired by the epidemic of knife crime, it was not based on a single case so there is no such thing as the “true event” of adolescence.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 12:52 PM
-3

Dr Mary Koss is an American researcher who found that stat in 1987, I got my stat from a UK website with up to date studies which also include male rape statistics https://rapecrisis.org.uk/get-informed/statistics-sexual-violence/
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:33 AM
-2

The man vs bear scenario was more so due to unpredictability. A bear runs on instinct and lives in the woods, it is meant to be there and you can accurately predict how a bear will react. Whereas a man isn’t supposed to be in the woods and you cannot predict his behaviour. When you take into account the fact that 1 in 4 women have been sexually assaulted, it is not unreasonable to be weary of every man until you know the man’s intentions which is why many picked the bear, they know it’s intentio…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 07:47 AM
0

So you ignored the majority of my point and focused on one specific area. During a 9-5 job, are you expected to give up your bodily autonomy to earn a pay check? Are you expected to have an increased risk of sexually transmitted diseases to earn your money? Are you expected to have an increased risk of violence from your clients to earn your money? Are you expected to have an 18x higher risk of being murdered while working to earn your money? Are you stigmatised for your work and therefore hide …
/r/MensRights17/08/25 04:36 PM
-2

Sweeping floors does not take away your bodily autonomy, it does not increase the risk of exposure to sexually transmitted diseases, it does not make you 18 times more likely to be murdered and there is no stigma behind sweeping floors that would make an individual scared to report abuse to the authorities, seek medical attention or be open about their work to their family and friends. It isn't being a 'puritan' to acknowledge the genuine issues of the sex industry. I absolutely will speak about…
/r/MensRights17/08/25 02:56 PM
-7

I never made the claim that porn requires the use of abuse or trafficking, I stated that it is inherent to the current industry, which it is. I never made the claim that eliminating porn would eliminate this issue, obviously banning it would drive it underground and cause more harm. I don't agree though that selling sex isn't inherently more exploitative than working at a desk. Lets say that the industry was completely regulated and sex workers are legally protected, that doesn't change the fact…
/r/MensRights17/08/25 01:50 PM
-15

Sure, many jobs involve some level of exploitation but that doesn't negate the trauma, abuse and trafficking that are inherent to pornography and prostitution. The level of exploitation in these industries are not even comparable to a 9-5 job.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 11:39 AM
-16

Prostitution and pornography are inherently exploitative industries. It isn’t “anti male” to recognise the ethical issues with such industries and to be against it.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 08:34 AM
1

https://schoolsweek.co.uk/we-need-to-advocate-for-poor-white-boys-or-others-will/ One of the most consistent findings in education data is the fact that white working class boys underperform. That isn’t being “racist, classist or sexist”, it is a fact. I’m not saying this is caused by their gender, class or race - just that this demographic underperform compared to others due to a multitude of factors.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 09:55 PM
-6

Actually, its white working class boys who are underachieving in school due to a multitude of factors and society absolutely does care, clearly evident in this very post which shows it being spoken about in one of the most popular sources of news in the UK. Parliament have also addressed it and have listed numerous solutions to the situation which are actively being implemented. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/203/education-committee/news/156024/forgotten-white-workingclass-pupils-let…
/r/MensRights16/08/25 04:33 PM
3

I was simply pointing out the issues with the methodology of the study.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 03:46 PM
3

'Woke' is a loaded term and is often used in a derogatory way to insult someone who is perceived as 'overly sensitive' or 'too' politically correct. Due to this, many people will not openly identify as said label even if their beliefs fall in line with what is defined as 'woke'. Whereas being socially liberal overlaps with 'woke' beliefs and it does not have said negative connotations that are connected to the term 'woke', meaning that people are more willing to openly identify as such. This mea…
/r/MensRights16/08/25 03:35 PM
7

Actually, it has been consistently found that university graduates are more likely to hold socially liberal views - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00323217241266029 The study quoted in the article only surveyed 1453 students and it doesn't even state where they got the participants from which would drastically impact the data, to put it into perspective, the average large university has over 30,000 students while smaller institutions have a couple of thousand. Both more than the a…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 10:16 PM
1

I absolutely agree that the justice system in the UK is not perfect and needs reform, 100%. I do think our prisons are disgusting, I completely disagree with the notion of 'punishment' which our justice system is based on, the focus should be on rehabilitation to reduce recidivism rates. I detest the idea that people convicted of a crime should be made to suffer, deterrents such as the death penalty in the US do not work, it has been consistently found that rehabilitation is the best way to redu…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 09:32 PM
-1

Right, so I think we are coming at the discussion from two very different perspectives and life experiences which is important to address. I am white, from a upper middle class background, well educated etc. and I see police being active in the community as a good thing, its important to reflect on my background to acknowledge why we may perceive police differently and potential biases that may arise due to personal experience. Being arrested doesn't equate to being convicted, I am for people be…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:56 PM
-14

They are evidence of the programme being good because the police are more able to monitor the area since they're being more active in the community. Wouldn't you agree that monitoring the area better is a good thing? Wouldn't you also agree that 18+ arrests in 4 weeks, including for sexual assault and theft, is a positive for the community? I don't think getting the police involved is inherently escalation if said person feels unsafe and feels it necessary to involve the police. Are you against …
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:25 PM
-22

I am for telling people that behaviour isn’t ok, I’m not for people being arrested for it Not sure why you’re struggling to comprehend that. Police officers monitor/ police lots of behaviour that isn’t illegal such as suspicious behaviour, arguments in public that haven’t reached the threshold of illegality but the police will step in as a precaution, unwanted attention that hasn’t met the threshold for harassment but the police step in as a precaution etc. It’s about preventing the escalation o…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:03 PM
-19

The police in the video literally said that it isn’t a criminal offence and people aren’t being arrested for it, the behaviour is just being addressed i.e telling people that behaviour isn’t ok. I don’t agree that people should be arrested for catcalling and the video doesn’t state they are being.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 07:50 PM
2

I don’t think you understand what proposing is. It happened after being in a long term relationship with someone and they’re usually planned ahead i.e both partners know about a proposal beforehand and agree If you’re proposing to strangers then yes, you’re going to get rejected, obviously? Why would you ever propose to a stranger, man or woman?? That’s odd
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:39 PM
-8

That’s simply tradition, any gender can propose and many women do propose to their boyfriend.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:27 PM
-4

One person does not choose a partner, it is a mutual decision based on mutual attraction. As a man, I have had many romantic relationships with women and I am not a “1010 billionaire chad”, whatever that means. Again, if you think that’s reality then you need to step outside
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:15 PM
-4

This is such an out of touch view. Please go outside.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:05 PM
1

Im really glad that you pulled through and you're making progress, thats truly amazing. I think it is definitely wise to have a break from pursuing relationships so you're more able to focus on yourself, I also think it might be worth taking a break from platforms such as reddit and maybe social media in general? It can negatively impact your mental health to consistently see such negative topics, whether thats here or on any other area of the internet it might be worth looking into therapy if y…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 02:35 PM
-1

… Jesus. Yes, I said the arrests quoted in the article such as sexual assault and theft are a good thing. Im not going to argue with you again about this, people can read exactly what I said and clearly see you’re misrepresenting me. Also, do not compare me in any way to white supremacists, that is borderline sick of you. I won’t be replying to this thread anymore, goodbye.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:37 AM
0

You seriously love to misrepresent me huh? I specifically said that people who cat call SHOULD NOT be arrested or imprisoned and that it isn’t even a law in the UK. I said that people who are suspected of a crime I.e. sexual assault, theft etc. should be arrested and the crime should be investigated. I suppose you’re counting on people not actually clicking and reading the full thread, hoping they see your drastic misrepresentation and think that’s what happened. It’s seriously dishonest of you.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:28 AM
-9

That’s what I’ve found, the focus isn’t on issues that impact men but rather continuously talking about women and feminism.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:25 AM
-7

It’s not about being “prissy or judgement”, it has a restriction on explicit content.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 07:56 AM
-6

ChatGPT is restricted to avoiding discussions that involve hate speech, explicit content and graphic violence.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 07:51 AM
-7

The fact you’re getting downvoted for this is shocking to me.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 07:33 AM
2

Miserable people who are projecting their own terrible relationship experiences on every relationship
/r/MensRights14/08/25 09:18 PM
1

Ah sorry, I completely misunderstood your comment
/r/MensRights14/08/25 09:11 PM
0

If the post explicitly stated that it was about toxic people then that would make complete sense but it doesn't, it's coming across as all relationships with women are negative since it doesn't make that distinction between healthy and toxic. Judging by the comments, people are also taking it as a blanket statement regarding relationships too rather than just toxic ones.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:48 PM
0

It greatly minimises the chance, yes
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:32 PM
-3

Get to know a person before dating them? Become friends with them first? Don’t rush into a relationship? Lots of ways.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:23 PM
8

Thoughts? That the person who made that and those that relate to it have had awful relationship experiences or no experience at all. If you only see a partner as someone who can give you something then you’re never going to have fulfilling relationships. Your partner should be someone you see as a friend as well as a romantic partner, someone you have common interests with, can talk to etc.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:15 PM
7

Basic human respect is a given until said individuals actions prove that they shouldn't be respected.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 01:41 PM
0

You’ve misunderstood evolutionary psychology and mixed in pseudoscience and stereotypical claims.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:30 AM
1

Individuals with a diagnosed disorder should be treated with empathy and understanding, yes. That being said, people with said disorders can be abusive without the correct treatment so it is so important to know when to distance yourself, when to cut contact etc. My friend has BPD and I am her “favourite person”, my actions and responses can impact her dramatically and I would advise someone to not get involved with a person diagnosed with cluster b unless you know the symptoms, how to handle sa…
/r/MensRights13/08/25 05:09 PM
-8

Narcissistic personality disorder affects around .5-1% of the population, I hate the current overuse of the word narcissist. Just further stigmatising an already stigmatised disorder. We need to treat people diagnosed with cluster b disorders with empathy and understanding.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 04:45 PM
0

You realise those arrests weren’t for catcalling? Catcalling isn’t an arrestable offence in the UK, they were for other things I mentioned such as theft and sexual assault, as stated in the article. Feeling unsafe comes from not knowing if it will escalate into sexual assault, having police presence minimises said risk and therefore makes someone feel safer. This is literally just having more police on the streets to make people feel safer, I have no idea how you could have an issue with that Wh…
/r/MensRights13/08/25 09:26 AM
-1

I’m not saying people should be arrested for catcalling, I’m saying that if police presence makes people feel safer and police are able to step in and put an end to cat calling then I don’t see an issue. More police presence on the streets are also able to address other issues such as theft and sexual assault, as mentioned in the article. It’s about feeling safe on the streets. This isn’t about men harassing women, it’s about stopping catcalling for everyone. Whether that’s a woman catcalling a …
/r/MensRights13/08/25 09:12 AM
-2

The victim decides 🤷 I'm not really interested in arguing with you about this tbh, if you think that you should have the right to make unwanted sexual comments/gestures to people then that says a lot about you I don't think there's anything wrong with having more police on the street to step in and obviously, its working since 18 arrests have been made after 4 weeks of launching 'jog on'
/r/MensRights13/08/25 08:49 AM
-4

I don’t think anyone should have the right to make unwanted sexual comments/ gestures towards others 🤷 if you think that is policing language then ok Some language should be policed which is why we have hate speech laws in the uk
/r/MensRights13/08/25 08:15 AM
1

Isn’t this good? If it makes people feel safer then 100% I’m for it It says that since “jog on” was launched, 18 arrests have been made for various offences such as sexual assault and theft, not sure why anyone would be opposed to that.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 07:07 AM
1

Being a weasel? You made an anecdotal statement about your experiences in a church, I can’t read your mind, how was I suppose to know you actually meant to talk about statistics? Next time say what you mean instead of something completely different 🤷
/r/MensRights12/08/25 08:30 PM
-2

The comments here about tattoos are such wild takes, tattoos literally say NOTHING about a person other than they happen to have ink As a man who has tattoos and piercings, I have never been treated differently or seen as “telling the world to eff off” or accused of toxic masculinity… odd take.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:15 PM
3

lmao ok then ??
/r/MensRights12/08/25 02:34 PM
1

I’m not defining an entire religion. I’m sharing my own experience within it which is exactly what I said. If you think personal experiences can’t exist alongside a broader, diverse belief system, that’s your misunderstanding, not mine. I’m happy to talk about my lived experience, but I won’t accept being accused of something I didn’t do. Let’s stick to what was actually said instead of making false accusations.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 12:15 PM
2

You're putting words in my mouth. Saying "I’ve had a different experience regarding Christianity" is not the same as claiming that one person defines the entire religion. I was speaking about my own lived experience, not making blanket statements. If you’re going to respond, at least engage with what I actually said and not what you imagine I meant
/r/MensRights12/08/25 12:04 PM
3

You were talking about your experiences in the church? You literally said In fact I've never met a healthy happier couple than in church. That’s anecdotal
/r/MensRights12/08/25 11:52 AM
0

When did I ever look at an individual Christian and say that person defines an entire ideological movement? I said the opposite, that I’m not going to argue with their experience of the religion and I was just sharing that my experience has been different 🤷 Again, reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 11:47 AM
5

I'm not going to try and discredit your anecdotal experience or argue with you regarding your religion I will say though that as a bisexual man, I have had a very different experience regarding christianity
/r/MensRights12/08/25 11:37 AM
-2

That's because you look at individual feminists and say that one person defines an entire ideological movement with multiple subsets. Same logic as me saying all MRA are rape apologists because Paul Elam, a self proclaimed Mens Right Activist, stated that women are begging to be raped due to their clothing. Do you see how said logic doesn't work? Yet people here do the exact same to feminists.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 11:07 AM
-5

It’s interesting that many of the things you advocate for like degendering laws, protecting due process, and challenging societal bias that infantilises women or punishes men more harshly, are also concerns raised within feminism (especially gender-critical or liberal feminism). Quite ironic really, you have the same views as feminists, you're advocating for feminist aligned goals while blaming feminism for said issues (: I wont be responding in this thread anymore, just wanted to hear you compl…
/r/MensRights12/08/25 10:29 AM
-3

I’m not looking to argue with you, I just have a question after hearing your perspective quite a bit. What is your ideal world and how do we achieve said world? I.e regarding equality What does your perfect world look like?
/r/MensRights12/08/25 08:25 AM
7

Traditional Christian views and true equality are contradictory statements
/r/MensRights12/08/25 07:31 AM
1

You're completely misunderstanding my point, I never said that you should see a child the same as your biological children, I never said they should matter as much or that you're a bad father if this isn't the case. I simply made a point about having empathy for all children, as demonstrated with my example regarding my father and step father, my father doesn't even have a relationship with my half sister since he has no relation to her but he never left her out when we were children.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:10 PM
0

The wider publics opinion has nothing to do with a legal case, it is completely irrelevant actually. The legal system is what is important, the opinion of some random people online that have no understanding of the legal system or of the nuances of the case is irrelevant. Take this post for example, this person left out key details of the case, whether that was a genuine accident or not, and therefore misled many people into thinking she wasn't charged because she is a woman. When, in reality, s…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:12 PM
0

If you had read the study my friend, you would have realised that it discusses how many women state that they love their abuser, they want the police to have mercy on the abuser by releasing them without bail conditions, how the system should have mercy on the abuser because they want a relationship with the abuser and they want the bail conditions dropped so that they can see the abuser etc. and due to the acceptance of the statement being retracted, the women's plea for mercy is being respecte…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:59 PM
-4

Again, I don't think this is gendered at all, victims retract statements and/ or don't press charges regularly for a multitude of reasons https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0032258X231159807 - study on why women retract domestic abuse allegations against male partners, some of the reasons include being trauma bonded to the abuser, children are involved and they don't want to destroy the family unit etc etc. It happens, it isn't a gendered thing and I'm not sure why you are arguing aga…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:22 PM
-3

People don't press charges all the time, you know that. Do I think it's right? Absolutely not, she should have faced the full consequences of her actions but there's nothing the law can do when the victim decides to not press charges.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 11:58 AM
5

As I keep saying, he has no obligation to support this child financially and he isn't, I am not advocating for OP to financially support this child at all. You are making up a scenario now which isn't grounded in what OP wrote, he isn't trying to be a father to this child and clearly does not have an emotional connection to her as he was more than able to cut her off completely after the divorce. He also wrote at the end 'So AITA? If so I’ll eat it and continue to help with Ella.', this isn't a …
/r/MensRights11/08/25 10:10 AM
-9

I understand your point but if we're going purely off what OP wrote, his ex wife seems more concerned with her child being 'abandoned' by OP while he takes his biological daughter out to fun trips. Yes, that isn't his biological daughter and he has no legal responsibility to her, we have established that. He does not have to financially support her legally and he isn't. But, OP hasn't simply stepped back from the financial aspect, he has removed all emotional attachment to said child and wont ev…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:32 AM
-10

I don’t disagree that he should have the right to step back financially, which he does and he has done. That isn’t the issue, it’s the fact that he raised that child and he is the only father she has known. It wouldn’t hurt to take that child for days out with his biological child, to spend time with both children and to make sure she doesn’t feel left out. This isn’t about finances, child support etc. it’s more so do to with that child’s feelings, she shouldn’t suffer emotionally because of her…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:09 AM
-26

I mean, the guy raised a child for 4 years, he is the only father that child has ever known. From that child’s perspective, her dad has abandoned her and now only loves her sister. Legally, he has every right to do that but morally? It’s unbelievably cruel to not even offer to take the child out, that’s his daughter’s sister. As someone with a step father and a biological father in my life, when I was a child, my father would never take me to my mothers with fast food/ gifts without getting some…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 08:48 AM
-11

She was charged with 4th degree domestic violence assault. However, the charges were dropped because Christian Coleman, the victim, declined to pursue the case against her and did not press charges. This has nothing to do with her being a woman, he simply didn’t press charges and he defended her, calling for people to treat her with “grace and mercy”. This incident has gone completely viral with multiple news sources discussing it.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 07:10 AM
1

General appeal doesn't make beauty objective, there's no universal standard of beauty but rather trends of beauty standards and cultural shift. This is why being extremely skinny was idealised in the early 2000s while large hips and paleness was considered beautiful in the victorian era 🤷 Not everyone is attracted to the same people, even if they're famous or conventionally attractive. Your own comment 'beauty is not subjective but beauty can be subjective' simply shows the contradiction in your…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 07:14 PM
-3

That type of blanket statement isn't accurate at all. Peoples perception of their own attractiveness varies widely and calling someone 'delusional' due to confidence or having a particular set of standards is unproductive.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:43 PM
0

"Mostly hot people' doesnt work either, like I said, attractiveness is completely subjective. I could find someone extremely attractive whereas you could find the exact same person unattractive, that is simply individual preference 🤷
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:38 PM
-2

I'm not sure what you mean, if a woman doesn't meet a mans preferences then he doesnt have to be in a relationship with her. Again, why is it an issue that a woman seeks a specific man, even if said man isn't interested in her, does it matter? It is her life and it only impacts her
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:29 PM
-3

My twisted views? i.e. people can swipe on whoever they find attractive and attractiveness is subjective. That's not twisted and you would find that the vast majority of people agree with that. If you aren't prepared to engage with someone with a different view then simply don't reply.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:25 PM
0

I do agree that attraction is built over time when you get to know an individuals personality but regarding dating apps, it is based on your appearance and the information you include in your profile. Therefore people are going to judge you on your appearance and that will be a factor as to whether they swipe, that is just how dating apps work. I don't agree that only 'hot people/ very attractive ones benefit'. Attractiveness is subjective, someone I find attractive and would swipe on might be y…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:20 PM
-5

Don't meet their own requirements? What does this mean? Many men want a woman that is shorter than they are, since they aren't the same height as their preference, does this mean they don't meet their own requirements and is therefore a problem? Do you see how silly that logic is and how easily it falls apart? Unless you mean only regarding specific things, in which case your logic is inconsistent and falls apart. The men that many women are 'hunting for' absolutely do take them into considerati…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 06:12 PM
-15

Again, I don't think it is an issue that women don't match with people they aren't attracted to. Attractiveness is subjective and many women do match with the demographic of people you used as an example, attractiveness isn't a singular box in which everyone has the same standards/ preferences. Peoples dating lives have nothing to do with you and they're allowed to swipe on whoever they want on dating apps. Would you want a woman who isn't even attracted to you to swipe on you? No, you would wan…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:57 PM
-32

It's their opinion? Their personal experience on a dating app, does it matter, truly? I genuinely don't see an issue with people changing settings to match with who they're attracted to. The height filter is also available to men who can filter women in relation to height which is also fine. I genuinely do not see the issue with this, I use dating apps and I get a plethora of matches with many women who actually are attracted to me. Why would you complain that women who aren't attracted to you a…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:53 PM
-1

No, I meant I feel a similar way towards “mens rights activists” as OP feels towards feminists
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:25 PM
-51

I watched the first 40 seconds, what a gross video. People are allowed to have standards and preferences, whether that’s men or women. Tearing women down for having preferences is gross and I don’t see what this has to do with “men’s rights”.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:18 PM
-1

I absolutely do care, I think it is clear that we both just have very different perspectives on what causes said issues and how the issues should be solved.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:28 PM
-3

As someone who identifies as a feminist, I feel very similarly to MRA. A lot of them have awful personal experiences and therefore their responses are grounded in emotion rather than logic, a lot of them don't care about mens issues but rather care about being anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 03:55 PM
-7

Literally, no one here knows how the app works and what taps even are And yeah, that’s such a fake profile 100%
/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:21 PM
-11

That isn’t being respectful of someone’s time, I’m not sure you know how taps work on the app. You message someone who has tapped u if you’re interested, messaging someone when you’re not even interested is wasting both OPs time and the persons on Grindr.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 12:26 PM
-32

I’m confused, as someone who has also used Grindr, she only tapped you, she didn’t even message you. Why didn’t you just read her profile and then simply ignore it? Do you reply to every single tap you get to tell them you’re not interested? She didn’t keep going, she explained what she was looking for, she didn’t want to have sex with you but it was a sex party so I assume she is tapping literally everyone and when people respond to a tap, it usually means they’re interested
/r/MensRights09/08/25 09:34 AM
0

Thanks for clarifying what you meant by meat grinder. I said 'largely excluded', not that they were completely excluded. I provided links that demonstrate how they ere excluded in some ways, I never implied that women never worked, I actually said the opposite. Reading comprehension is key. You said, 'Most people didn't have bank accounts until relatively recently, because of class rather than gender', you didn't say that class was a key barrier for anyone. The existence of some responsibilities…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 01:46 PM
-1

I'm not sure what you mean by 'forced into the meat grinder', obviously in todays society, men and women both have to work, one income households are very rare in todays economy. If you're referring to having to work historically, yes, women were oppressed for being largely excluded from the workforce https://dwpdigital.blog.gov.uk/2018/03/01/100-years-of-womens-work/ - brief history of women working in the Civil Service, they were not able to be promoted and had to resign once married due to th…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 12:55 PM
-2

I would argue that men are expected to be the breadwinner and are conscripted due to patriarchal standards i.e. gender norms that paint men as the 'provider' and the 'protector'. These roles weren't created to oppress men but rather to uphold a system in which women's rights and autonomy were limited i.e preventing them from having a bank account, freedom outside the home, not being able to vote etc. I agree that these gender norms have placed unfair burdens on men and said gender norms should b…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 09:34 AM
-2

Hi again, so I'm not trying to discredit the fact that men have faced insults based on their gender, I was just explaining the difference between an insult and a slur. A slur is a word that relies on some form of power imbalance against oppressed or marginalised groups that have historically faced structural oppression and social exclusion. Men haven't been historically marginalised based on being male so the definition of slur does not fit them. Do they experience gendered insults? Yes, they ju…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 09:05 AM
-6

Words are classed as slurs due to historical context and intent behind said word. The words against women you mentioned have a history of being used against women in a sexist way so therefore would be considered slurs. I understand what you’re saying but it’s important to look at it from a historical perspective and to understand the connotation behind such words. It’s obviously bad to insult anyone though, just important to recognise the difference between an insult and a slur, just as being ho…
/r/MensRights07/08/25 09:54 PM
1

I suppose we fundamentally disagree in that sense, I don't believe abortion is murder and I am completely pro choice Have a nice day
/r/MensRights07/08/25 08:16 PM
-6

Pretty inaccurate, family annihilators are overwhelmingly men (91% are male) https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/230412.pdf - information on men who murder their entire family
/r/MensRights07/08/25 07:25 PM
0

You're moving the goal post. You claimed that Caroline Norton was a feminist and therefore 'first wave feminism' was to blame for the issues with family court, this is historically inaccurate as Caroline Norton was actively opposed to feminism and suffragette, I have explained this to you and your response is 'yeah well... irrelevant', that is intellectually dishonest and every time I correct you, you move the goalpost further back. Women being seen as caregivers is not a 'modern thing'. Histori…
/r/MensRights07/08/25 11:01 AM
0

Caroline Norton was not a suffragette and never identified as such. The context is not irrelevant considering you framed her as a 'feminist' which is historically inaccurate. Her plight was based on personal suffering i.e. wanting to se her children. She stated publicly that she was against the Suffragette movement and believed that women were naturally inferior to men. it is not irrelevant to state that a leading feminist organisation advocates for equal custody rights of the children when you'…
/r/MensRights07/08/25 10:23 AM
0

You're referencing a woman in the 1800s who didn't even identify as a feminist or even believe in equality for women? Conveniently leaving out that she was emotionally and physically abused by her husband, how even when they separated, she was still seen as his property and was unable to divorce him due to having no legal rights? How she couldn't see her children because the father held absolute legal rights and custody of the children? https://law-school.open.ac.uk/meet-caroline-norton-fighting…
/r/MensRights07/08/25 09:35 AM
0

Genuinely, no men’s rights are at risk. Obviously, men face issues but that is due to gendered stereotypes, intersectionality etc. The people here do not care about men’s rights, a lot of them spread misinformation resulting in more harm I.e will say that charities focusing on men don’t exist when there is a PLETHORA of said charities. This is an antifeminist sub and many people here are misogynistic. Equality feels like oppression when you’re accustomed to privilege.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 07:43 AM
-1

https://www.amazon.com/Find-Boyfriend-Parents-Million-Leave-ebook/dp/B0F8QL1TNL#:\~:text=Book%20overview,party%20and%20wrote%20a%20book. -It's a fictional satirical rom-com book, just read the description rather than getting outraged over a title
/r/MensRights06/08/25 09:01 AM
0

You don't post with evidence and counterarguments my friend, you rely on misrepresenting the other persons argument in order to seem like you're 'winning' and you rely on circular arguments to dance around the point being made. I absolutely enjoy having my opinion challenged and there is a plethora of proof on my account where I have had lovely conversations with many people who have a different view to me. In contrast, your comment history is strictly r/MensRights which, yes, is an echo chamber…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 07:37 PM
0

My mate, you sent a link that shows me agreeing with others and having a respectful conversation... like I said. And then you showed up and completely misunderstood intersectionality, misrepresented my stance using bad faith tactics... I wish I was as unaware as you, seems blissful to always believe you're right and everyone who disagrees with you is some evil feminist monster (:
/r/MensRights04/08/25 07:23 PM
0

I'm not having a tantrum mate, I think that would be you. You are literally spamming almost every comment I post on this subreddit trying to get a reaction out of me, it's seriously weird and I'm just not engaging with it (:
/r/MensRights04/08/25 07:05 PM
1

Ironic that you would say it is important to have 'your ideological BS challenged' when I am on this subreddit, directly having it challenged and talking to many different people yet you're not on any other subreddits with a differing POV, you're always here. Going back YEARS. That is called an echo chamber my friend (: My mere existence in this sub demonstrates that I do not simply consume information that validates my beliefs. I have found middle ground with many people here and I have had man…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 06:44 PM
1

I dont try to minimise the issue at all, I think it is important to put everything into context though. Should people who make false accusations face the full extent of the law? 100%, I would never argue against that. That isn't what I'm saying at all. I have sent multiple links to many people on this subreddit, I also shared a link to a male sexual assault survivor charity here. Awareness is definitely the key, I agree and it is really shocking that many people don't know these charities exist
/r/MensRights04/08/25 06:34 PM
1

As a bisexual man, I absolutely care about issues affecting men and I am very active in LGBTQ+ charities and I am currently writing my Masters dissertation on said topic. I have published research and working on research to be published rn focusing on male issues and I will be presenting said research in a conference very soon (: I also donate to a plethora of charities The thing is, I actually do care whereas you do not. You care about smearing feminism, you care about blaming women, you do not…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 06:31 PM
1

I don't agree that false accusations are equivalent to rape, false accusations definitely do negatively impact the accused, victims etc. and they should be 100% be addressed. The fact is though, they do not happen at the prevalence your post suggests and I would argue that it is more beneficial to spread actual awareness about male victims of sexual assault on this subreddit as I rarely see anything mentioned about charities/ resources available. I have spoken to people on this sub and a lot of …
/r/MensRights04/08/25 06:18 PM
1

https://www.rapecrisisscotland.org.uk/resources/False-allegations-briefing-2021.pdf https://research.open.ac.uk/news/heres-truth-about-false-accusations-sexual-violence https://www.rsacc-thecentre.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/False-Reports-The-Facts.pdf You literally have a higher chance of being raped yourself than falsely accused. Less than 3 in 100 rapes reported to the police even result in the perpetrator being convicted which is disgusting and this subreddit should be providing suppor…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 05:13 PM
-1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmE7Gw61Hwc
/r/MensRights04/08/25 02:51 PM
0

The fact you included Warren Farrell in this list discredits your opinion completely. Farrell directly compared women getting raped to men being unemployed, arguing that they have similar repercussions. He also argued against the American Violence Against Women Act and is friends with someone, Paul Elam, who publicly stated that women are begging to be raped due to their clothing.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 02:18 PM
1

That’s literally insane for numerous reasons, ChatGPT is shockingly bad for the environment + putting all your personal information in it is stupidity at its finest. Your chats aren’t private, there was a huge data leak a few days ago. Maybe talk to women like a normal person rather than tricking them through AI, AI doesn’t know you, it knows what you tell it. It knows an idealised version of yourself and it will exaggerate/ fabricate traits to answer your prompts, that is why AI is unreliable, …
/r/MensRights04/08/25 07:46 AM
0

As someone with a 1st class degree in psychology, I have published research and this is a ridiculous take. You should never simply dismiss information, if you’re questioning the legitimacy of it then look into peer reviewed studies and educate yourself
/r/MensRights03/08/25 12:07 PM
1

I’m not trying to convince you of anything, feminism as a whole doesn’t focus on men’s issues, I never claimed that. What I’m saying is that feminism focuses on equality for both men and women through campaigning for structural change. I have sent you articles that discuss that a little, I encourage you to continue doing more in depth research outside of social media. Read books, read academic papers etc. I would argue though that this subreddit does not focus on men’s issues, the focus seems to…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 10:08 PM
1

Then look into the article that you believe didn't show that, look into who wrote it, what type of feminism that they follow and go from there. Like I said, feminism is extremely nuanced and many branches of feminism disagree with each other completely on many points so it shouldn't be spoken about as a monolith. I do agree that there are bad people in every ideology but I don't think said people represent that ideology as a whole and I think it is damaging to yourself to see it in such a black …
/r/MensRights01/08/25 09:49 PM
1

I think that is an extremely back and white view of a nuanced ideology which encompasses numerous perspectives i.e. radical, intersectional, cultural, liberal etc. Feminism advocates for equality and structural change to benefit BOTH men and women Some links of different feminist perspectives on men: https://righttoequality.org/why-feminism-is-good-for-men-and-why-all-men-should-be-feminists/ https://feminist.org/news/feminism-is-for-men-too/ https://thefeministshop.com/blogs/the-feminist-hub/wh…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 09:17 PM
1

I wasn't looking to debate with you at all, just sharing my thoughts on your post - have a good day (:
/r/MensRights01/08/25 03:26 PM
2

I'm not too sure about that, there have been many documented cases of people supporting something that is completely opposite to their identity i.e. lgbt individuals who opposed gay marriage being legalised, women who opposed the right to vote etc. I don't know, I think it's a really nuanced topic and it's difficult to comment on for me since I have no idea who she is or what she believes in
/r/MensRights01/08/25 03:03 PM
1

I've been downvoted to hell by literally everyone for simply having a differing opinion. From my experience, most people here are completely unwilling to have an open conversation, they aren't looking to find middle ground but are looking to argue and argue and 'to win' the conversation. I do agree with the overall premise of this sub i.e. addressing real issues like circumcision, male victims of abuse etc. but I think people here go about it in the completely wrong way, the constant talk about …
/r/MensRights01/08/25 03:01 PM
-1

I know nothing about her so I can’t comment on what she stands for but I will say that the argument “we don’t hate women because this one woman who agrees with us is popular” isn’t the gotcha you think it is. Just reminds me of the racist who says “I’m not racist, my friend is black” like, ok? That doesn’t stop you from having bigoted views
/r/MensRights01/08/25 02:31 PM
25

“Kim yosh” is an AI generated persona. This is all completely fake and “his” backstory is also AI generated. Let’s not fall for AI.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 03:28 PM
1

Sorry, have u seen that trend on tik tok? With the I’ll be there sound? Literally u every time I comment on this subreddit lmao U replying to me here really made me think about it so had to share
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:55 PM
0

I was just sharing my experience 🤷
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:15 PM
1

As a 22 year old bisexual man, I have never had an issue with dating 🤷 I meet amazing people regularly. After reading the comments here, I think that if you're continuously attracting bad people then maybe it's time to look inward, there seems to be a common denominator in those situations
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:04 PM
0

All the hardware specs and decentralised tech in the world don’t erase the fact that this entire vision is rooted in a deeply misogynistic worldview, one that reduces women to obsolete objects and encourages emotional isolation through artificial substitutes. You talk about demand and market incentives as if they justify dismantling real human connection and empathy. The social and psychological damage from normalising AI companions as replacements for people is enormous and not some technical p…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 06:18 PM
1

I don’t think anyone should be surveilled in their home, that’s not what I’m saying. What I am pointing out is that the kind of hyper-personal AI companion you’re describing, one that remembers conversations, reads your mood, simulates emotions, adapts to your behaviour literally requires the collection and processing of intimate personal data So either the data is stored locally, meaning incredibly powerful hardware in your home (which makes your vision economically unrealistic) or it’s stored …
/r/MensRights28/07/25 05:48 PM
-2

So let me get this straight, you’re against surveillance, but you want AI companions with memory, mood tracking, emotional analysis, and full physical intimacy? You think governments will just let that happen without oversight?
/r/MensRights28/07/25 05:44 PM
-4

Considering OpenAI already has policies against erotic content and China, the US and the EU are proposing legal limits on how AI can engage with emotional and sexual content, I am very happy to bet that this would never happen. It is simply a techno-misogynistic fantasy of yours, that is it.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 05:38 PM
-2

This sounds dystopian in literally every way imaginable. Maybe keep your odd sexual fantasies to yourself
/r/MensRights28/07/25 05:24 PM
0

Are you seriously misrepresenting me again? I didn’t dismiss statistics, I contextualised them and explained how intersectionality works. If you can’t or won’t engage with that, just be honest and say you don’t understand intersectional analysis instead of twisting what I actually said
/r/MensRights28/07/25 11:52 AM
1

I hear your frustration and I agree that some feminists do generalise men unfairly. That kind of rhetoric is harmful and should absolutely be called out but if we respond to generalisations with further generalisations, we're not actually challenging the problem, we're just flipping the script and continuing the same dynamic. You’re asking for fairness and respect, which is valid. But if we only extend fairness when we feel it's already been given, then nothing changes. Someone has to step up an…
/r/MensRights27/07/25 09:49 PM
1

I understand your point regarding chosen ideologies vs innate characteristics such as gender but the main issue with generalisation isn't about whether said groups are defined by choice or biology but through fairness and accuracy. Generalisations about any group are misleading and harmful. Feminism may be a chosen ideology but it is diverse and includes a number of perspectives, generalising based on some individuals ignores this complexity It is ironic because the original person I was replyin…
/r/MensRights27/07/25 07:57 PM
-1

Its quite ironic to complain about generalisation to then go on to generalise an entire ideology
/r/MensRights27/07/25 07:26 PM
1

That is insanely ironic to say, I stated statistical data on this topic because I was shutting down a bigoted comment that stated that they would trust a female driver less than a male driver. I'm sure you can acknowledge that is bigoted and that type of rhetoric needs to be shut down with education
/r/MensRights27/07/25 05:07 PM
0

I understand what you're saying and the differences between safety vs skill you have pointed out. However, this conversation is based on public road use which is based on how an individual navigates a car in their day to day life, not on how they perform under extreme pressure, this is why driver safety data is used in this instance to measure "better driving". So if we're judging the "better driver" by who’s less likely to crash into someone or endanger others on the road, women come out ahead …
/r/MensRights27/07/25 05:04 PM
-2

Do you not understand what statistically means? Sure, the average professional driver would be a better driver than both men and women who aren’t in that industry. Statistically speaking though, women are better drivers than men on average.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 01:55 PM
1

Obviously referring to every day driving
/r/MensRights27/07/25 01:09 PM
-16

You understand that statistically speaking, women are better drivers than men? https://news.sky.com/story/women-are-better-drivers-than-men-study-finds-11484839 Let’s stop with the sexist stereotypes. Edit: The way this comment is being downvoted says everything about the people who spend time in this sub. I was responding to a sexist comment that perpetuated the stereotype that women are bad drivers, shutting that rhetoric down with education is important.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 11:40 AM
-1

lol im sorry, I said I wasn't gonna reply but u legit 'proved me wrong' with a link that proved me right lmao I said, "While aspects of the model are used such as coordinated community responses and intervention programs for perpetrators..." and you sent a link to interventions for perpetrators saying I'm wrong... lmao thanks for proving me right ig
/r/MensRights24/07/25 11:14 AM
1

I stopped replying to this person because they have a very black and white view of everything and simply don't understand basic concepts, their way of having a discussion is circular and reductive 🤷 For example, the comment you responded to discusses the Duluth Model of domestic violence which, yes, was a feminist model and yes, it is gender specific and was created to address perceived systematic failure to protect women from domestic violence. However, this model was developed in the early 198…
/r/MensRights23/07/25 05:16 PM
1

A patriarchal system is simply defined as a societal structure in which men hold the majority of power in the government, business positions, religious leaders etc. It doesn't matter what peoples personal definitions are, just what the actual definition is. You're moving the goal post, you originally asked for examples where men are given special attention or concern for specific issues, I provided them to you and you are now saying 'yes but... funding'. You obviously don't understand how charit…
/r/MensRights20/07/25 05:26 PM
1

Christina Hoff Sommers promotes equity feminism and emphasises legal equality for men and women. https://thefeministshop.com/blogs/the-feminist-hub/why-the-suicide-rate-in-men-is-a-feminist-topic?srsltid=AfmBOorlS1CpQoYrfPEO15NNFoPPtBhv6s3weFnzc0ETr5l3fQpSDHtV - feminists discussing male suicide https://innocenceproject.org/ - work to overturn false accusations/ imprisonment, isn't explicitly a feminist organisation but aligns with feminist values and principles https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guid…
/r/MensRights20/07/25 11:50 AM
1

...You understand that you contradicted yourself by saying the patriarchy has been dismantled and then you stated that it only exists in the elite section of society? That is what the patriarchy is, a society where the majority of power is held by men i.e. what you literally just said. Examples of society giving special attention or concern to the issues you mentioned: https://mankind.org.uk/ - UK charity that specially focuses on men affected by domestic violence and homelessness https://www.me…
/r/MensRights20/07/25 11:04 AM
1

I'm sorry, did you miss the entire point of my post? I created it based on the connections that I made to feminist beliefs and topics that people on here talk about. Obviously, I mentioned feminist beliefs in my post based on comparing the two ideologies. I had no ulterior motive with my post, I simply made it to see what people in this subreddit think about the connections that I made as I wanted to engage in conversations with people. You seem like a very paranoid person, I do not care enough …
/r/MensRights19/07/25 09:16 PM
0

I don't think it's feminism if thats what you're leading to, I think it's society as a whole and the gendered stereotypes placed upon males and females. Stereotypically, men are seen as the aggressors and women are seen as victims, dismantling gendered norms/ stereotypes would greatly help in recognising male abuse victims as they would be able to move away from gendered labels placed upon them
/r/MensRights19/07/25 03:07 PM
1

But this group also dismisses feminism as man hating group, I think both movements are quite against each other equally
/r/MensRights19/07/25 02:53 PM
0

I can't speak on your anecdotal experience, I am sorry you went through that though and I hope you have healed (:
/r/MensRights19/07/25 02:52 PM
-1

Voting rights in the UK were never tied to the military or the draft, they were originally granted to the upper class and relied on someone's status and wealth, excluding the majority of men and women. There is an argument to be made that the military influenced voting reforms, this did not give anyone a right to vote but more so influenced parliament to allow all men to vote, not just those of status or property owners. Voting rights in the UK were actually in 1928, this is when all men and wom…
/r/MensRights19/07/25 02:50 PM
-1

Right but the point is a man’s ability to vote isn’t reliant on the draft
/r/MensRights19/07/25 12:46 PM
1

Obviously, women and men are different biologically but how would this impact the idea of equality? I disagree though, in my experience, the vast amount of people here do not want to engage in an open conversation with people with a differing opinion, I have been met with hostility and discontent by most users. I don't believe I have demonstrated a hostile attitude towards men with the goal I have mentioned, my posts describes how said goal would benefit mens issues that are spoken about regular…
/r/MensRights19/07/25 11:42 AM
0

I don't believe feminist spaces are more hostile, I think that feminists are quite guarded because of the misogyny that is seen in spaces like this from some users which comes across as extreme and dangerous.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 11:35 AM
0

We're talking about a time when women were legally seen as second class citizens, women weren't even allowed to open their own bank accounts in the UK until the 1970s. Obviously, there weren't laws surrounding what women should do with their money because their money was legally controlled by the husband as were any inheritance or property that they owned so therefore the laws were directed at the husband who was in control of all asserts. Women fought for financial independence from their husba…
/r/MensRights19/07/25 11:27 AM
0

If you read my replies, I am engaging in actual conversations and I am being respectful, I’m not trying to parrot any rhetoric or persuade anyone. I just stated my beliefs to start a conversation, I very definitely haven’t been “trolling”, feel free to read through my replies which demonstrate this
/r/MensRights19/07/25 09:53 AM
-2

Women did not avoid suffering during both World War One and two, they worked in factories, assisting in the manufacturing of weapons and machinery. They worked in insanely dangerous conditions where many women lost limbs, were blinded and many women died in these factories. They were poisoned from the chemicals which left many disabled for life, women suffered too during the war, regardless of whether they were drafted or not and it isn't fair of you to forget their contribution and sacrifices d…
/r/MensRights19/07/25 09:13 AM
1

Most likely, there are insanely toxic people on both sides, it is important to remember to not base your opinion of a specific group on that loud minority though which a lot of people seem to do on both sides. Feminists see this group as misogynistic due to the misogynistic minority here whereas MRA see feminists as against men as a whole due to a minority there One of the reasons I decided to make this post, I think conversations are important and it is difficult to break through the extremists…
/r/MensRights19/07/25 09:07 AM
0

There definitely is a focus on women's issues in feminist spaces, just as there's a focus on mens issues in this subreddit. I don't think that is an issue tbh
/r/MensRights19/07/25 09:03 AM
1

I have answered this point previously so will just copy and paste my response (: That’s 100% an issue and the legal definition of rape needs to be changed, I would argue that is more so based on the traditional view of sexuality I.e. a male and a female having penetrative intercourse. I don’t think the definition paints men as monsters, it’s just a very heteronormative and traditional view of sex and rape
/r/MensRights19/07/25 08:57 AM
-1

I agree, a patriarchal system does harm both men and women in different aspects. People in this subreddit are quick to say the patriarchy isn’t real but they then talk about issues such as men being seen as the aggressor and women automatically being seen as the victim which is a patriarchal belief I think both MRA and feminists do agree on the same points but the language they use are vastly different, they don’t want to agree so they use different language to appear like the points aren’t prac…
/r/MensRights19/07/25 08:52 AM
1

That’s 100% an issue and the legal definition of rape needs to be changed, I would argue that is more so based on the traditional view of sexuality I.e. a male and a female having penetrative intercourse. I don’t think the definition paints men as monsters, it’s just a very heteronormative and traditional view of sex and rape
/r/MensRights19/07/25 08:27 AM
0

I am a man and I have frequented feminist spaces, granted not on Reddit so you might be right. I think both sides aren’t super open to conversations about their beliefs without becoming quite hostile, it’s sad because it is stopping important conversations from taking place
/r/MensRights19/07/25 08:19 AM
1

I’d agree with that, every side is going to have a loud minority that makes the side look bad
/r/MensRights19/07/25 08:09 AM
-2

I am looking at this from a British point of view, men never had to sign up for the draft to vote here, the draft doesn’t even exist anymore. I agree that female perpetrators of domestic abuse are an issue. You have to remember that male circumcision and FGM are not comparable, just because they were both referred to as “circumcision” does not make them the same. FGM involves cutting the clitoris off and sewing the vagina shut while the small girl is conscious, often with no pain medication sinc…
/r/MensRights19/07/25 07:43 AM
-1

I agree with that, my experience in this subreddit has been quite negative due to some individuals who just want to spread hate and division. Despite coming here with an open mind and wanting to engage in open conversations, some people just want to be rude and hostile simply because we have differing opinions
/r/MensRights18/07/25 11:11 PM
-7

Reading comprehension is dead. My post doesn’t say that at all, not even remotely
/r/MensRights18/07/25 11:07 PM
-2

When did I say to give women advantages? My post is focused on male issues that are frequently spoken about on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:42 PM
-2

I mentioned multiple in my post
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:30 PM
1

Historically, children did go to the father but this is due to the legal notion that the father was the head of the household and therefore had an innate right to the children, men were also seen as the authority figure and the main breadwinner of the household and a woman's social status was inherently tied to her husband The fact that children went to the father historically is actually heavily based on sexism and gendered stereotypes
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:30 PM
1

Thank you for taking the time to explain your perspective, I definitely don't want to be associated with a group where the majority believes in what you have discussed so I will look into it (:
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:24 PM
-2

What would you say is the diagnosis then?
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:20 PM
-1

I'm just trying to expand my worldview and understand different perspectives, I really wasn't expecting people to be so unwelcoming on this sub
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:03 PM
1

As I said, I don't know much about it so I will definitely look into it more! I definitely agree that both men and women should have equal access to contraception. Thank you for your time (:
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:00 PM
-2

I would very much agree with you that any worldview that perpetuates the belief that any group of people are monstrous is entirely incorrect and dangerous. I interpreted the patriarchy as being a system in which men control a disproportionately large share of social, political and religious power, I don't think men are monstrous for this, in fact I believe that men are victims of this system as I stated in my post. I wasn't aware that others viewed this as being inherently anti-man or that peopl…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:49 PM
0

I will be honest, I have never heard of an argument made by feminists that are against heterosexuality so thank you for providing quotes! I will definitely look into it (: As I said, I know nothing about it but from what you have said, it sounds ridiculous. Obviously, there are different types of feminism though and I would never support feminism that promotes division in any aspect, whether that is through gender, sexuality etc.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:39 PM
0

Thank you for the suggestion! I am trying to look into several different ideologies to form an unbiased opinion so I will definitely look into egalitarianism! (: I definitely agree that male sexual assault and male victims in general are treated completely differently than female victims of the same crimes. As I mentioned in my post, do you think dismantling gendered norms/ stereotypes would help with this? i.e. dismantling the idea that men cant be victims, that men are the aggressors etc. I fe…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:34 PM
-13

Would you say that the belief in the idea that we live in a patriarchy as inherently anti man then? And if so, what are your beliefs about dismantling gender norms and stereotypes?
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:29 PM
-1

Thank you for replying! I think it is important to have open discussions with differing sides to form an unbiased opinion, although I keep getting mass downvoted so I don't think I'm super welcome here I have heard of male birth control pills and the controversy surrounding it, I was under the impression that they aren't readily available in the same way as female birth control due to researchers terminating trials as the side effects were deemed unacceptable despite being similar to female birt…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:25 PM
-20

I completely agree with you that there are feminists that don't believe in equality as a whole and who do cause division between men and women, as demonstrated by your examples. I would say though that there are members of all groups and organisations that paint said group in a bad light, I am more so referring to feminist theory and beliefs regarding patriarchy rather than specific individuals. I suppose I worded it badly by saying 'feminists' when I should have said feminist beliefs. I also th…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 08:56 PM
-10

I'm not sure what you're trying to say, sorry
/r/MensRights18/07/25 08:45 PM
1

Exactly, I'm not too sure why people are disagreeing and downvoting when all I'm saying is that in a professional setting, a conclusion should always be evidence based rather than a judge basing their conclusion on their personal opinion of the case The legal system would be insanely corrupt if legal professionals were able to dismiss evidence and lead with their personal opinion or if judges were able to just ignore certain laws because they personally deem them as unfair
/r/MensRights18/07/25 08:36 PM
-3

Without a sufficient amount of evidence, the accused individual is acquitted. I don't think we should assume people could be lying if there isn't evidence of a crime taking place, there are multiple scenarios in which a case may not have sufficient amount of evidence i.e. evidence has been destroyed, lost or damaged etc. Assuming someone could be lying could be detrimental to their mental health, victims have rights which include being treated with respect and dignity, assuming they're lying sim…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 05:37 PM
-6

I disagree with talking about women, or any group of people, as monolith. I understand what you're saying, some people 100% lie in court which can and has resulted in false imprisonment. I think this is more of an argument to reform the justice system, there are numerous factors that go into the miscarriage of justice including human error, eyewitness misidentification etc. and this should be looked into further
/r/MensRights18/07/25 05:20 PM
0

If there is legitimate evidence that someone is lying to the professionals that you have mentioned, then it would be dealt with appropriately. Councillors, judges etc. cannot base their professional conclusion on their own personal opinion, that just opens doors for people already in a position of power to misuse their influence and they absolutely should face consequences if they did that. We're talking about peoples lives, it should aways be evidence based, not just an intuition that someone i…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 04:22 PM
-7

If you had read either article, you would have realised that 'the end of hissies, whistles and stares' was discussing the sexual assault that she faced on the streets throughout her life, comparing it to the percentage of women who have been sexually assaulted/ harassed on a national level and ways that other countries outside of America have attempted to deal with the issue. The second article referenced the same stories of sexual assault/ harassment, it discussed how that has now lessened comp…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 07:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter