TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UsernameDiscovered Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by UsernameDiscovered on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-8

If 'armchair lawyer' means that I have a passing knowledge of UK law (which I do) and the ability to google things (which I also do) then consider me an armchair lawyer. Quite frankly, if you're sure it applies then take her to court. I'm sure it doesn't because a) she did not slander anyone and b) she did not incite hatred (that is to say that there are no people, to my knowledge, who transitioned from not hating white men to hating white men as a consequence of her comments). If you can point …
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:16 PM
0

defending a feminist? Could you point at the stage at which I 'defended' her whilst respect the age old tradition of explaining≠defending.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:50 PM
2

I don't know if you noticed but I got into this disagreement because I was arguing exactly that. I was making the point that although people felt that they could 'sue', actually this is not the case in the UK.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:41 PM
6

Unsure how to respond to that. Apparently dissent makes me a feminist... I guess it's clear that I'm not welcome here so me saying I won't come back is no big deal. I wonder if you care that there are many men like me throughout society who have clear belief that something has gone wrong through the powerful shifts in the way we see gender and the way men and boys are treated but that they are driven away from the political groups that fight under that banner because they're scared of being asso…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:12 PM
-6

Errr. Faux outrage/shock/offence aside, I'm simply making the point that the law won't see it that way. It's not slander to threaten to kill someone - it's a death threat which, under UK law, is made against an individual. For the record, I don't think it's necessary for one to pretend that she was serious and didn't mean it as a (stupid) joke in order for one to think that she should still lose her job. It's quite obvious that she isn't actually making a definite exhortation to people to kill o…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:14 AM
1

Am I defending her? What I am saying is that you can't just 'sue' her. My personal opinion is that she's enough of a fool that she's clearly not able to do her job but I certainly don't buy the 'I'm actually worried she'll actually kill me to death' criticism.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:09 AM
2

Is it? Check p57 of the universities funding report http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/highereducation/Documents/2013/FundingEnvironmentForUniversities.pdf
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:08 AM
0

Why not?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:57 AM
-3

Do you know how the law works in the UK? There isn't a law for everything - you don't just 'find grounds' - there aren't grounds.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:53 AM
-6

Ok. So you're talking about a private prosecution? You just bring a case under normal UK criminal law - while rare (because it never works) this isn't 'suing' someone but no matter. Harassment Not going to happen. 'Putting people in alarm or distress' is not going to work because under section two of the Harassment Act 1997 it must be aimed at an individual. Collective harassment requires a closely connected group. Also harassment must involve repeated attempts to contact the members of that gro…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:52 AM
46

Are you aware that Goldsmiths' is in the UK? You cannot just sue someone for making your life difficult - it's a little more complicated than that especially when they're an elected representative for a charity.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:50 AM
10

Yeah... It's not taxpayer funded. No British universities get a block grant from the government anymore since undergraduate fees are supposed to cover tuition. Research (which Goldsmiths') does not really do is paid for from a variety of sources but goes to research projects. The Union is covered by union dues paid by members and likely a block grant from the university which will come from a variety of sources but not the tax payer. Both the union and the university are charities.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter