TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UtilitarianByNature Archive

View 6 posts and 101 comments by UtilitarianByNature on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

puts on sarcasm hat Oh you're right lets totally change the narrative and stop fighting the pervasive belief that women are incapable of evil because we are scared. This is extortion and thought control.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 04:20 PM
1

The commentary or just this list?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:28 AM
4

OMG just spent like 2 hours making a huge comprehensive list. and hit "back" I'm sending you all my links without the commentary. Domestic Violence: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Feminism Hurts men 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Male Disadvantages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Power Plus prejudice argument debunk 1 2 3 4 False rape and sexual Violence, Female Offenders 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Wage Gap Myth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:43 PM
1

That's not how philosophy works. Philosophy is using thought experiments to try and answer real questions about the nature of existence. Sure there are plenty of unanswered questions, but it is not just idle speculation.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:58 PM
2

Gold? Hell, I've got the Black card, forged from a titanium-steel alloy and quenched in a barrel of women's tears. Etched with a quote, "It was my privilege." THAT'S Sarcasm *just in case disclaimer, that was a joke
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:04 PM
2

For a group where many claim language has so much power, it is kind of strange they refuse to be careful with their words when addressing men.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:51 PM
1

Would you care to unlock my shackles ma'am.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 03:17 AM
5

Please ignore this and move on, this is something I have seen for the last few years. It is not new, it is reframing men's issues as how we can help women first. For some of you new MRA's, it is just a ploy for feminism to co-opt the movement.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 03:12 AM
1

As though society would somehow even accept men being like women? Men are DISPOSABLE and it is their greatest strength for society. If men were granted the same compassion as women society would crumble. This article seems to think men are even allowed to have compassion from others but that is untrue. Compassion for men stops when their usefulness to women runs out.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 03:11 AM
5

You're painting with an awfully wide brush there. There are plenty of supportive comments in this group as well. I think you're biased in that men's emotions (particularly anger), aren't acceptable to society. This comes back to the idea I think that men's anger is seen as scary, so when we express ourselves, society at large puts a much larger magnifying glass and demonizes us more quickly because we might "hurt" somebody because we are so big and scary. TL;DR: You don't currently understand be…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:37 PM
1

Go on?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:25 PM
1

This is one thing I don't understand about some women I hear, as well as one of my key beefs with equal outcome equality. Some people are better than others at something. I think this is an interesting topic actually. Is this why communisim can't really work? Is it impossible reconcile a belief that we are all equal yet actively see that within that framework there are some people that are better than others at certain things? Is there any other way to incentivize innovation? I feel like the mar…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 05:55 PM
4

Personally? Disposability. But I am kinda kinky like that.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:56 PM
26

Men are already considered objects with no inherent value (read men's value must be proven). Sexual objectification is no far stretch from there.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:44 PM
1

Nice usage of the word cadre.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:36 PM
1

Baby Moses Laws?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:24 PM
2

I disagree, equality often has societal costs. I think you're just not willing to pay them and to be honest I find it incredibly hypocritical and sexist. I feel if the tables were turned you would be out campaigning and having walks saying how "unfair" it is that women have to support a kid that they didn't even want. I agree with one of the posters above, I think you are very good at making this argument seem like it's for the children/society. When in fact it has been shown that your concern f…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:20 PM
1

I think many women view the option of having a man to support them during their pregnancy as a right. then wouldn't the mother going through with the pregnancy anyway be a way of saying "I am choosing to be a single mother"? I think some women feel slighted. Somehow, not having a father around, (financially), removes a choice that they, "should have had." I.E. "Now I am being forced to have this abortion just because some guy didn't want to really have a baby with me even though we both consente…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:14 PM
2

“In some settings and for some conditions, women suffer more ill health, but globally males have a higher burden of disease and lower life expectancy than females.” That is the most dubious double-speak shit I have read in awhile. What is he even saying? Women suffer more "ill health" but men have a higher burden of disease? “Gender norms drive risk-taking. Drinking alcohol and smoking, in particular, are subject to social pressures which have resulted in men globally running three times the ris…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:58 PM
1

The horror of, "The Incident"
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:17 PM
1

Yeah I gotta say, it's obvious you have put a lot of effort into this picture and I am feeling the emotional response behind how your feeling threatened at certain groups passing overreaching laws. But to be honest I can't really make sense of the argument you presented. It looks like a woman who dressed, what could be construed as provocatively, is arguing for some sort of laws to protect women in particular from some vague form of harassment. Do you think you could try explaining more clearly …
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:39 PM
1

You're*
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:11 PM
4

I would like to point out that for all of their, "helpful hints" and explanations, if you changed the group they were being directed at to themselves, it would be really good advice. Such as not having a self-fulfilling prophecy about men hating you. And, really MRA's are working for your rights.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:55 PM
1

The point is your above comment about concubines is pointless. It means nothing as it requires a stretch of the imagination as a wikipedia entry about women being concubines proves nothing. Legal and social practices just punished them more for doing it, historically speaking. I don't believe this. I see no compelling evidence to back that up. Frankly, by actually bothering to present evidence and cite historical precedents, Wikipedia counts as nothing as far as convincing me personally. I'm the…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:12 AM
1

The common man is hardly a part of the society wikipedia is referring to. Most god fearing men, had responsibilities to their wives and children. You're actively ignoring my points and creating your own argument to argue against. Why you continue to point the finger at men as the sole proprietors of evil in the world I don't understand. Nor do I understand why you can't seem to view the issue with the proper complexity it deserves rather than the oh so tired, "women's suffering is always worse t…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:51 PM
1

Condoned? I think you'd be hard pressed to prove any of that. Even if they were it wouldn't matter. You're comparing apples to oranges. You're comparing the condoning of female Mistresses and concubines, (which did exist), to the lack of a male counter-part and then inferring that this lack thereof means that females were looked down upon solely to cheat. As I said before your extrapolating a hypothetical out of a hypothetical. If women DID demand male concubines and studs, (which they do they j…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:21 PM
1

I don't know that the existence of lack thereof of Mistresses and concubines proves anything other than the demand for sex from men is such that there is a lucrative market for prostitution. The equivalent for females not existing simply means there is little female demand for male prostitutes as women usually can get sex from any number of willing males when they choose to have sex. To say it proves anything about a less of a stigma for cheating males I think is a bit of a stretch.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:20 PM
2

I am all for situations where a quality that a person can't change about themselves, I.E. Skin color or gender, should play ZERO part in how we evaluate people. Especially when dealing with their livelihoods. I think its kinda fucked up that for example, just by having a "black name" on your resume, with the same qualifications you would be less likely to get a call back. What I don't support is the "feminist style" argument that takes it a step further and says, "I shouldn't have to change anyt…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 05:31 PM
1

The biggest glaring error here is calling all the people being accused rapists. Seriously, stop with the "report = rape" stuff. No one is a rapist unless they actually raped someone. We have to have enough faith in our justice system to assume, if someone wasn't convicted that they were then MOST likely NOT a rapist, though not impossible less common. Completely disingenuous. Not too mention, statistics on what has been reported on or not are pulled completely out of ones ass. To suggest that so…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:14 PM
0

I can't understand why I got downvoted so hard for this statement.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 05:06 PM
3

Agreed, while there might be some arguments as to the social aspects of how we teach our sons and daughters, I certainly see nothing particularly glaring in this case.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 09:33 PM
0

Based on our past discussion, what makes these sites special in speaking for feminism? Are they now a reference I can use to say that these particular sites are ones that for sure speak for feminism? I ask only because often we go in circles defining who speaks for feminism, and I want to be able to pin down a definition and an authority which we can constructively criticize.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:53 PM
3

I agree, it could be more "airtight", just more of an observation and some discussion, I think I did a good job of making sure I defined the topic so I wasn't speaking from a definition that was vague. But I do think that I lacked tying the conclusions to the main premise in a way that was less "ethereal". Let me try again? (but also let me ask, what kind of sources would you define as "credible" here? Edit editI guess my question in even further detail is who would you accept as an authoritativ…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:44 PM
-1

My most hated argument, well it's in tons of books and is peer reviewed from all this information I got from my feminist "name a female heavy major" classes. Of course they wouldn't teach it in college if it wasn't fact. There are "tons" of studies, apparently the studies mere existence is enough to prove and not their content. The sad thing is "peer review" essentially boils down to, well everyone else believes it so it must be true. Unfortunately, for those of us schooled in epistemology that …
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:33 PM
1

Men want equal treatment but the accusation that this focus on women has been a conspiratorial act of deliberate dishonesty and bad faith is a far more serious charge. I wouldn't say on purpose, it's difficult to change when the narrative tells you that of course women need more protection. Even when it's statistically unsound. And to say that "violent women are left to freely terrorize and harm their partners" is a bit of an overstatement; female-on-male domestic violence is still illegal, even…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:58 PM
1

Okay, seriously cut it with the bullshit I thought we were talking: The original topic for this thread was whether men have actually oppressed women, and I've tried to stay on that topic, so I find it somewhat disingenuous that you keep trying to shift the conversation towards standard antifeminist talking points (e.g radical feminist quotes, who speaks for feminism, examples of alleged feminist hypocrisy). The original topic of this thread was arguing that by believing in patriarchy theory, tha…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:58 PM
1

Okay, I am mostly in agreeance with you so far, just three nagging things. And I want to preface this with, I agree feminism has some good qualities, that was never in doubt, I am pointing out there areas where I think there is some serious doubts as to the theory and mindset of how to solve gender issues. I didn't see this addressed: Then tell me who speaks for ALL of feminism? I imagine that question is impossible, it is such a large conglomerate of ideas, not too mention for the most part man…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:05 PM
3

For the sake of logical discourse. She might be stupid because society frowns on public nudity. But, would the act actually increase her chances of being raped? We often make the argument that feminists feel that every man is a potential rapist. Would her being naked suddenly summon a frenzy of otherwise non-rapist men? I don't think that's what your saying. Or is it more that for the rapists who DO exist being completely naked around them might make you more likely to be a target? I feel that's…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:58 PM
1

As far as Dworkin is concerned, you're right. I can't find anything attributing that quote directly. Although I did just read something that seemed to show her in a light that is a little more cheery, and I must admit she's a bit different than I imagined. I do dislike her idea that men inherently believe that they are biologically superior, and that violence is their natural state. It is shamefully easy for us to enjoy our own fantasies of biological omnipotence while despising men for enjoying…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:14 PM
1

Damn, You know I wanna preface this with a thank you for holding a good conversation with me. It's not often I get farther than "Fuck You". That being said: Who is saying this? Marilyn French "Whatever they may be in public life, whatever their relations with men, in their relations with women, all men are rapists and that's all they are. They rape us with their eyes, their laws, their codes." "I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woma…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:03 AM
1

It does seem kinda counter-intuitive though. Like even still I day dream about working high enough into the "system", such that I can guide it in responsible and better directions to help us all. Take it down from the inside man! Haha. Reminds me of a Patton Oswald Joke "I know how we can stop the war. We're gonna knit the world's smallest pair of hemp pants and put 'em on a mouse, and hide " "but, which cupboard is it in, man? People will be so busy thinking about that, they won't have time "
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:19 PM
2

I wonder if we could all learn that responsibilities are actually authority. If we take them up proudly and demand respect because of those responsibilities, maybe all men (regardless of race) would feel more at ease in our skin, our homes, our schools, our jobs. Wow, really well said, I have been going through a lot myself recently and this rings true with what i have been experiencing lately. Most if not all my failures came from wanting to distance myself from responsibility, and what I perce…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:51 PM
5

For all of us my brother.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:18 AM
6

My take on 3, is that it's all part of the plan. Look up the milgram experiment. "They found similar findings to Milgram: half of the male subjects and all of the females obeyed to the end." Who fights wars and tyranny? Men. Who more often than not questions the status quo and the establishment? Men. Who is more likely to not just go along with the program and do as their told? Men. It's not that men are "better", I would just say that statistically speaking, we are harder to control, and the cu…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:54 PM
19

The short Non-PC answer: Pussy. They don't know any better because young men have been slowly dismantled. I include myself in this! I have only very recently begun the journey of finding myself and truly deciding how to view the world with my own deductive brain. I can speak from this exact situation in that: Men are being increasingly feminized Men are being increasingly made dumber. (on purpose or not I couldn't tell you) Men are increasingly having their metaphorical wills broken by a system …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:19 PM
21

God what a multi-faceted question. I'll answer best I can in a few points. Victim-Hood and tugging the strings of peoples emotions remains a VERY powerful tool when manipulated just right. That being said there remain huge inequalities due to our "forefathers" actions and in general due to the world emerging into a more compassionate consciousness. This begs the question: For wrongs that we done prior how do we truly compensate? How do we put everyone on the same level? The problem when we (MRM)…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:40 PM
1

Greater rewards brought to them by greater risk. Women as a whole by and large, in general were safer. Is it possible that some women who wanted to take risks and couldn't existed? Absolutely, Just like there were some men who maybe didn't want to take risks and be Solely responsible for his entire family and their safety. But when men wanted to shirk their responsibilities you act as though they had a choice. I am NOT arguing women didn't have hardship. I am arguing though it is not due to some…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:34 PM
1

Here is the biggest issue in the modern discourse with someone who has been taught the feminist perspective. Girl: I think women have problems, and men are the sole cause of all those problems I mean look at what mean jerks they are sometimes. Guy: I am with you on the women having problems part, but I think it's unfair to frame the discussion such that women = good, men = bad oppressor, given the majority of examples of good men. Girl: You just wouldn't understand your part of the oppressor cla…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:07 PM
2

I found What you're looking for: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:17 PM
3

Bye
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:14 PM
3

This is actually a really great idea. I wish I had the time to compile it. I'll just have to continue with my armchair activism for now. So without sources here are some great places to look. No-fault divorce, I don't know that you'll find many laws, but you'll more than likely find a lot of "advisory" information where judges are "urged" to rule in favor of women. The Draft - I'm sure you'll be able to find some feminist groups out there arguing that it should stay the same, or that it's not th…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 09:28 PM
0

Boooommm
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:28 PM
27

Lik dis if u cri evrytym
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:02 AM
1

Might be helpful ---> http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/home
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:55 PM
9

So I'm going to try and cut through the underlying emotions and people's comments that I am seeing here. Beefypatties12, bottom line is this from an outsider perspective I see you, probably an educated man, who participated in a study that has caused a lot of harm to many innocent men. Outside of feelings towards you or not, I think this is a valid criticism to say that THE study you participated in was questionable at best. 1. You claim it's not the studies fault as it was applied to a very spe…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:38 PM
0

Firstly, your question is LOADED as this group was never found to be a hate group. For that reason alone I am calling bullshit and an attempt at derailing. Would someone remind me why we care that a blatantly radically feminist funded group in the south, that I and many others hadn't even heard of until the whole "hate group" labeling fiasco, has basically wagged their finger at us and said well they COULD be bad? That's just a ludicrous as trying to prove a negative. "Well Prove to me that unic…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:56 PM
1

It sounds like an episode of leave it to beaver. Man that show has soo many sexual innuendos.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:52 PM
1

Let me tell you it's really... BIG
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:45 PM
2

Everyone knows you're a communist, since you can't provide any proof contrary to our unfalsifiable assertions you are a communist pig traitor.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:26 PM
7

You do realize that just because you and a majority of women/society believes there is a patriarchy doesn't make it true? Majority opinion does not equal fact. EDIT: For too long men generously looked the other way and let you bullshit statistics and fake an understanding of statistics and science. We wanted to let you find your own way. It stops now, we're not letting you make anymore claims unchallenged without proof, you have lost your privilege to spout opinions unopposed as we have seen wha…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:23 PM
8

Now you're being disingenuous. Because average higher temperatures have nothing to do with rape, but an anti-rape campaign certainly does. Strawman. No, I wasn't making that claim, I was simply trying to juxtapose the idea that random change can't necessarily be attributed to any particular phenomenon with the weather as being some "random" thing. As discussed earlier its more than fine to suggest that more studies be done, but I was pointing out that based on the trend it is very likely there i…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:45 PM
11

I could be a bit off in my views here but I think you're missing a point. It has to be a statistically significant change. Not just A change. I see the same problem in business and this is the basics of statistical process control. You have to set upper and lower limits to the trendline and find outliers. What I see in this graph is a trend of two consecutive years where rape was rising, is it any surprise at all that the thirds year it followed the other peaks and then dropped? An analogy: In b…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:38 PM
5

If I may expand here, men have been trained by nature and social structures to be inherently generous with the extra labor ability at their disposal. Just as a woman brought child bearing to the equation so too men brought their strength, ingenuity and excess labor. Men were by and large brainwashed from these generations of giving in an untold contract that said, "Find a woman to share your labor with, or you and (possibly) your species dies." Feminism sought to give women complete autonomy out…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:38 PM
3

I take the issue on a case by case basis. You seem to assume I'm okay with all the Doxxing done by anyone remotely associated with Men's rights. Although an interesting read, I have no qualms with respecting radical feminists rights to privacy. I do kinda like your advocation of "powerful" people needing to be held to a higher standard of public scrutiny. Interesting.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:12 AM
5

I am not sure to whom your referring to with VA. I am guessing ViolentaCrez. I think you missed the fundamental point. I did not say revealing someones information on the internet was the worst thing ever. I am suggesting that our societies expectations when occupying a realm virtual or otherwise need to be upheld across the spectrum. When your in public, you act differently in some ways because of the understanding that it is a public place, there are expectations that come with that. People wi…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:52 PM
11

Yeah, I want to stay out of this, but this question has been asked too many times. There is a huge difference between the expectation of online anonymity in a forum which expressly operates with that as its modus operandi and being on camera in a public place. Plenty of people have said stuff on camera they didn't want to be seen saying and it got out. Did we punish the guy who released videos of Romney saying all the things he said during the election? I think the difference is, the internet is…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:35 PM
6

I seriously can't even head esplode....
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:18 AM
7

All these shaming "Peter Pan Syndrome" articles have one common thread. Worried about the future of America because "no one (read no men)" is going to be capable and more importantly willing to be the sacrificial blood for the machine anymore. I think they implicitly recognize that women aren't going to do it. Not because they aren't capable, but more so because the role of men is something they have never thought to question. Men's state as the disposable provider of society is simply something…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:52 PM
1

Then don't have 3 beauty stores cards, you live in America, do whatever the hell you want. Is the problem that no one store carries all the products you want? Or is it that you feel compelled, nay, you MUST have 3 beauty store cards because there is a man telling you to? Have some personal culpability here.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:05 AM
3

Yes, that was also interesting that after primary aggressor policies that women actually were arrested more often. i'd love to see those stats and extrapolate some whys. I just think its reprehensible that she essentially said, it law should be harder on men.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:51 PM
1

Happy reddit birthday. please accept my gift of signing you up for cat facts.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:27 PM
9

She handles arraignments in San Francisco's domestic violence court. Quote: Whoever calls the police first wins, she said. And that is usually the woman. "If you are a man, you are toast," she said. She actually spells it out right there in print that men are to be discriminated against.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:15 PM
5

Sasha is absolutely correct. Document, and ALWAYS be courteous in your business correspondence when dealing with matters of a sexual or personal nature. I find the best outcomes happen when your complaint comes off as a request, with an assumption of innocence on the perpetrating party. This gives them a moral out if it simply was a mistake and gives them a chance to apologize without ratcheting up the emotional ante. As you probably already know, many office offenses are simply mistakes based o…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:58 PM
1

I agree, I think the poster was referring to institutionalized specifically against women. But point taken.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:44 PM
17

Best comment I saw in that mix: So because our white male ancestors discriminated against minorities during their time, that's justification to discriminate against white men today? Everyone knows discrimination is wrong, but if you think you'll be able to eliminate the concept of bias (through retribution), be it gender bias, race bias or whatever you are kidding yourself. There is no such thing as institutional discrimination anymore, that is a concept of the past that people of today did not …
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:21 PM
2

Not trying to stir the pot here, but I'm pretty sure Register-her was created as a way to show people what is being done to men, almost a satire in a way. To your question about: If there was a site where accused men (of whatever offense) were posted I am sure we all would be appalled. I think there is one of those, the sex offender database. Which I think falls under a reasonable amount of scrutiny as the list of wrongs that can put a person on that registry runs the gambit to completely legiti…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:42 PM
1

When I am smoking often nosy people come up to me and "inform" me that it is bad for me. Usually, Ill make this super surprised face and look aghast in horror as I throw the cigarette as far as I can and point to the sky asking god for forgiveness. I feel like this would be an appropriate reaction when I read a real men don't rape poster in public. I didn't know... I just didn't know...
/r/MensRights27/11/12 10:38 PM
23

He's soo damn angry, I'm trying to figure out at what. I think he's making the classic mistake of equating a relative handful of rich men at the top and conflating that to mean that the other 99.9% of male experiences fall within that sphere. What's even more baffling is his insistence of splitting hairs on race as well. He is sexist against men, and certainly out to further discriminate and demonize against white men for whatever reason. Which not that I care so much about the white guy thing, …
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:36 PM
3

Goodness, there are a lot of finger wagging, concern trolls out today... this is like the 3rd or 4th post.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:46 PM
1

I hate saying this but I have to say, a lot of those issues seem... kinda... petty, I mean I'm not above thinking that perhaps I just don't understand because I am not used to being seen as an object. I guess if it were that nobody valued my intelligence and only my looks I would be a bit peeved. But is that discrimination? Isn't our perception of someone different from how we treat them? Why can't stereotypes have a hint of truth? Is it really an attainable goal to attempt to change the way the…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:41 PM
1

Question, might not be the right place for it: What legitimate gripes do women have in the Western world? I am not even asking that sarcastically, I think sometimes it is true that I get too riled up on one side due to personal experience. It seems, my experience here is that there aren't many legitimate gripes for women, BUT I suspect that is because I am at a site who of course is only going to be looking at problematic claims and the "bad" side. (for good reason). I don't expect y'all to answ…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 06:49 PM
1

If that is the case. Would it follow that women should not be allowed abortions and men should not be allowed to "financially abort" their children, since they are both equally responsible for the child? Basically removing choice from both parties in the interests of the child? Why should women get the opportunity to avoid her responsibility, (abortion), for the child while the man have no such option?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:36 PM
3

The problem is jopool, seems to be equating, "being a moral person who SHOULDN'T abandon a fellow human being", to by law you MUST be moral. You cannot force people to be moral. Even more so, by removing someones choice to be moral you remove morality entirely, as morality is based on having a choice on right or wrong and doing your best to make good choices. Let me put it this way: Moral people don't not kill people because the government says they should do. They don't kill people because they…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:28 PM
4

You cannot have responsibility without the ability to choose for yourself.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:23 PM
5

Equality is supposed to be objective. There are certain qualities about the human condition that I think we can all agree are ethically good or bad. Although I feel for your situation, we cannot just throw away true equality because it didn't work in just your case. Forcing another human being into slavery, is one of those things. Let's start with this premise: a) Man and women are equal, (whether or not you believe we were created or not by a god.) I think this is something we can agree on. Let…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:38 PM
3

1) Please enumerate any government-granted rights which men have and women do not have in equal or greater levels. 2) Please enumerate any government-enforced responsibilities which women bear which men do not bear in equal or greater levels.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:33 AM
3

Is that what it is? Sorry perhaps I mis-typed. With So many bullshit theories abounds its hard to keep them all straight.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:54 PM
4

What made me think about it was this post But I have definitely seen the argument used in many other discussions I have encountered and I feel the responses in general have been lackluster.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:22 PM
5

But then I start hearing arguments about well even though we have 55% of the vote the ethereal system known as the Patriarchy is ACTUALLY running society, so therefore men are powerful.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:18 PM
4

I don't know if I like that approach so much as it seems to give legitimacy to the theory. I read on another post somewhere that the whole theory is something stolen from the Black Panthers or something and in and of itself is just a bad not scientifically back theory to begin with. I'd rather somehow show that the whole thing is invalid to begin with. I mean the idea that people aren't discriminating just because they "lac the means to do so" but still believe in their ridiculously sexist/racis…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:09 PM
2

Violence against men when perpetrated by men is already illegal by law and carries hefty jail times. Violence against men by women, despite being technically illegal, is often never enforced and the jail times are laughable.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:49 PM
31

Being abused in my last relationship. Realizing my Ex's behaviors were supported by almost everyone around me.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:44 PM
1

Did not know that...
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:29 PM
1

I don't know how to feel about your statement. You're correct to think that perhaps Anthony is arguing from a bit of an emotional place, (hardly a crime), but I think there is some merit to this idea given our current state of affairs. Saying he has a victimized mind is a little much.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:51 PM
3

It may be that some particular aspects are unfair to keep mentioning and I agree Anthony's post is a bit redundant considering some pieces of it aren't well proven but I still see a potential problem here. The main issue I have is that these 7 or so women's departments seem to have direct influence over the future use and application of this law. Given the historical "women's only advocacy" of feminism is it too much of a stretch to imagine that with 7 groups hounding over their shoulders using …
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:48 PM
13

Many of which are heavily downvoted. People hold men's rights to a much more stringent standard of morality and self policing because they do not like them.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:13 PM
1

I'm not holding my breath. I can think of a couple special interest groups that would try to keep that from happening. crosses fingers
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:20 PM
7

This is the biggest utilitarian Facepalm to me, "For example, the law creates several new offices for women's health without corresponding ones for men's health. It outlaws insurance plans charging more for women, even though auto and life insurance charge men more, and nobody cries sexism about that." How many women are complaining that they are being beneficially discriminated against with car insurance rates.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:29 PM
1

I'd reframe the ideology as such. Based on the concept of, Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius and yes I know its a term referring to which goods are referred to in a legal contract, but it applies here in the sense of expressly leaving one side out of the argument is the same as discrimination Essentially, by mentioning women so much and creating "Women's only" offices while excluding the mention of men's issues, the bill is inherently bias towards women, sexistly so. The reframed argument by…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:39 PM
1

I tend to agree with you, but I still don't think high-false positive prostate screeening is enough to throw out the litany of other reasons that the bill is bad news.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:22 PM
0

A Satisfied Mind.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter