TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UyhAEqbnp Archive

View 10 posts and 146 comments by UyhAEqbnp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

can you indicate which posts?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 05:45 PM
3

I think it's pretty undeniable something is going to happen. The leftists hold positions of power and have been using their control of institutions to criminalize dissent for years now. It's going to have to bubble up someday
/r/TheRedPill28/09/18 04:12 AM
2

Ok, so what specific red pill beliefs do you dislike and why? Your viewpoint seems reasonable
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 06:24 AM
1

It's a CMV. If you have something intelligent to say go ahead and say it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 05:54 AM
2

I've never bought into MGTOW faggotry or the idea that marriage is evil, but that is a point. As for implying that simply speaking proves anything, well, you miss my point...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 05:49 AM
2

1) Where have I ever said that? 2) Why are you on a debate sub if you don't want to convince people?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 05:43 AM
2

(thereby confirming my views)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 05:41 AM
2

A little funny, since you also claimed that I had a new definition.... Anyways, blue pilled mentality as I see it is the denial of evopsych and minimization of gender differences. Basically, the intellectual content of feminism/gender studies taken in the direction of heckling people. As both feminism and gender studies are pseudoscientific belief systems, I haven't been able to find a single useful or intelligent contribution from the bluepiller crowd. Am I wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 05:40 AM
1

No, I'm not going to play definition games if you disagree with me. What is your definition of the blue pill, and what intellectual foundations does it actually have?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 05:30 AM
2

whole milleaux, unless I am misrepresenting them or something. There is a whole section on the internet dedicated to basically denying evolution shapes human sexual behavior, and I identify it strongly with this faction
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 05:17 AM
5

Yeah, redpill is pretty dodgy. But at the very least they seem to engage with evopsych and present semi-plausible theories that are worthy of debate. The blues don't seem to have any independent viewpoint at all besides "well that isn't true because it hurts my feelings"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 05:14 AM
1

you have to realize, their genetics are also passed on to men. Quite simply, women who are low quality give birth to low quality males who do not reproduce e: One speculative thing, some men should also be carrying genes better optimized to female evolutionary strategies. Probably the reason why shy men even exist
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 11:59 PM
8

This touches on the topic of "men need to be open with their feelings" and the toxic masculinity circlejerk, both of which are bad ideas coming from the opposite gender which has a different evolutionary game. Why do men try to be stoic? Genetics. Why would there be genes involved that mask emotion? Because they are involved in the challenges of mate competition, and bluffing/surpressing mood is a good strategy for success in that context. Imagine if a male deer was locking horns with another an…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 03:44 PM
1

culture is a cop-out explanation. Where does culture come from? What does it operate off of? Where does human biology come from? Evolution, particularly applied to social settings and human cognition, is the strongest tool we have. The football thing I would argue is intelligence screening. The fact you don't like it, is because it is a hobby associated with risk and aggression which are typically dumb attributes. But I could be wrong e: women not peacocking may be because they've never actually…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 03:12 PM
1

That's fair. I guess I just have higher expectations for the girls I like than most of this sub. Women have also answered extensively that they try to minimize unusual hobbies, and even if I disagree with the idea this seems to be practice To date however, there doesn't seem a very good evopsych idea as to why
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 02:30 PM
1

you guys seem interested in having potentially shitty dates, I'm just going to leave it at that
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 02:22 PM
1

damn, I could easily mistake you for a gullible blue-pill
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 03:28 AM
4

Nootropics seem like snake oil to me. The level of evidence we have for most of this stuff just isn't there, and my imprerssion is (like vitamins before it) the experimentation going on will be useless or harmful. Basically, it lowers SMV by taking from your income
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 12:34 AM
1

It's really ok, I don't think you're smart enough for me baby
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 12:31 AM
1

P1: You're an autist! P2: Those girls are normal (no mention of intelligence) P3: you're not smart! MC: Therefore, women aren't stupid LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 12:30 AM
1

so you agree with what I just said, but now want to whip around and call me pretentious for telling the truth...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 12:22 AM
1

I'm having a hard time figuring out whether you keep shitposting because you're a roastie, or because you want me to fuck you
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 12:21 AM
2

P1: don't like having nerdy conversation P2: Women aren't autistic C: Therefore, Women aren't stupid shittiest non sequitur yet
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/18 12:15 AM
1

we are talking about a concept so undefined it could mean many things. I think "sitcoms, tv serials, recent movies, and recent music" when I say it. And yes, I believe in accordance with the bell curve of human intelligence pop culture has to be dumb to appeal to all. The Zuck can watch movies or play games. The Zuck probably does not play the same games the mountain dew stereotype plays, as an example. Preferences and tastes signal what you value
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 11:12 PM
0

be specific about what exactly I said was delusional and why. Ten to one you can't and are just circlejerking for virtue points
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:41 PM
0

that sounds fun, even if poly is cancer. I've come to realize progressive liberals will only preferentially help other progressives, and that since women are usually of this orientation you get shut out of the pool pretty fast for disagreement. You also might have higher mate value than me and so have access to these things. Part of what this thread is revealing is that as a man you can't screen for smart people unless you have high value in other areas- finances, attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:34 PM
1

I have intentionally never taken a real IQ test, the memey ones I score about 115- not exceptionally higher than most people. But, maybe this IQ thing is obscuring part of what I'm bitching about. Hobbies like reading, enjoying education, and abstract thinking are not necessarily restricted to high-IQ people. It just seems like women aren't very interested in these things, and it is hard to resist the conclusion most of them stupid because of that
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:31 PM
1

I didn't say that tinder had NO smart women, I just think they are extremely rare. I've tried to explain elsewhere that the stereotype of iamverysmart is an example of how not to flaunt intelligence, and we recognize this because it is fakery. It is just that the types of hobbies expressed on [dating platforms] and level of communication seem to reflect not very intelligent people. And I guess on one level I'm bitching about it, but I'm also surprised by how rare it is to find "smart" women" and…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:23 PM
1

why don't we take your version and call it a day
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:20 PM
1

I agree, but it is always shocking to see the pervalence of "npcs". It's like the flynn effect was some sort of unintended abberation in evolution and now we're coasting back to the average of mediocre, stupid people. I just want to confirm that I'm not somehow misjudging 90% of tinder women to be morons and this to be accurate for most women. I'm not a super smart person myself, so it seems amazing to think that the great majority have no intellectual interests
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:19 PM
1

verbosity is a direct measure of IQ. This is not an opinion, it is a fact
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:16 PM
1

you are implying something you have no evidence for. What would be the evopsych (or other) explanation for women not wanting to attract intelligent mates? You seem to think displaying intelligence is identitical to being a braggart, but how you chose to speak is always a decision and reflects your IQ. How many women present themselves on tinder suggests there's a glut of stupids over there. Why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:15 PM
2

clearly does not understand what kafkaesque even is, calls it edgy to point this out. Starts crying about the need for more baseless insults elsewhere. Lel, 0/10
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:08 PM
1

right. So to get attractive men they just need to spend time on their beauty. This isn't mutually exclusive with screening for smart men, it actually works in conjunction
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:06 PM
2

what exactly is kafkaesque about this context. Poor guy spent most of his time boning retards in the trial and didn't seem to be ashamed of that specifically
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:54 PM
1

Sure, and most women rarely put commitment into their responses since the man has to do everything in a starting relationship. But every sentence a person makes implicitly reflects who they are, and people know this. The more complex a message is, the more someone is identifying themselves as a HVM. This is why men put a lot of effort into paragraphs directed to HVM women on dating sites. And women also, I argue, display this to passively find good candidates e: the first girl I was talking to w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:51 PM
1

"I need to have sex so the first thing I'll do is go to a mixed gender debate and ask if women are stupid" I am trying to have sex through tinder, I am always (as men everywhere are) trying to have sex with the right woman if opportunity permits. I am not specifically making a thread to discuss gender so I can have sex with you personally
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:49 PM
1

that is a valid point, there are different types of parties. What you are talking about is the academic kind.. what most people talk about is the have drunken sex kind. Think about the relationship which underpinned your party however. It is almost certain that everyone there is networking on a shared academic basis, not a gender basis. On a dating site it is a gender basis so they mean "have drunken times"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:46 PM
1

oh man, it goes on and on. Anyways: progressive liberal feminist financial advisor here, you should have sex with me
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:43 PM
0

there is a difference between Iamverysmart and being smart- that sub exists because people like to fake being smart and fail to understand it is an orientation, not specific buzzwords. You are not going to want to have a beer and then fuck someone who is stupid. You are not going to enjoy having a beer with forest gump in the context of "should I have sex with this guy". Don't fool yourself, intelligence is definitely a variable everyone screens for- this is because people less smart are less in…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:41 PM
1

Define feminine energy. Explain why men are setting the rules for sex when women are the gatekeepers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:38 PM
1

haha, someone finally says it. Are women just straight up stupid, brah? are people in general just straight up stupid at the tinder rate? Did something about tinder make women stupid? those are my questions notice how the thread is full of npc normies
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:38 PM
1

you have only implied that the hobbies do not necessarily make someone stupid. I have pointed out they all have in common no intellectual component, and that women have an incentive to flaunt intelligence for higher-value mates. Why would a woman who has only these hobbies not be considered dumb on those grounds? Be specific and without moral judgement
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:36 PM
1

articulate language and a greater deal of complexity. Stupid girls respond like "hey lol"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:34 PM
1

yeah, what I found with OKC is that they flaunt being a progressive as necessarily part of the package. There's the same basic viewpoint commoly expressed also- the "basic bitch" is still music, parties, beer no matter where you go. More high-value types are often big into yoga and eastern religious orientations... but they don't actually express what I would consider true intelligence either (listed earlier, intellectually demanding hobbies). And I of course do not go around talking like this o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:33 PM
1

tell me exactly why I am wrong. All you've done is make a value judgement
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:20 PM
1

how long does it take to judge someone you've just met? Seconds, this is empirically true. Why would it not follow that we judge people we are about to meet based on how they type and look on the internet? Of course people judge and make opinions at the first opportunity for prediction, we do that with everything
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:19 PM
1

please read what I said. Individually these things do not mark stupidity, but taken together and without anything else they definitely imply it. That is because none of these things requires intellectual engagement to experience, and if that is their only interest they are not demonstrating intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:10 PM
1

there is stupid culture, and normally that is also pop culture since it appeals to everyone. What people find fun is a function of intelligence also not that you're wrong, I still play video games with my friend group because it was a shared hobby and that was the basis of our network. However, most of the female hobbies on tinder are decidedly unintelligent in what they require
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:05 PM
0

lel. And that fits my preferences: tits>ass, oral>vaginal. ANYWAYS, there is definitely a typology of female compsci programmer (usually asian) that is clearly smart and displays it with this interest
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 09:01 PM
0

smart people are socially crippled That isn't actually true. Von Neumann was a ravacious extrovert, as was Feynmann, as was einstein- to name just a few. This is a hollywood stereotype which (so far as I know) is not supported by scientific studies on the matter. For every lone genius we think of, there are many smart people who like to talk. It makes sense too, since talking is one of the best ways to learn new things and engage in complex activities Social IQ has been known to correlate sharpl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 08:51 PM
0

A house party isn't the same as looking for a mate. In the first instance you are trying to build as many or the strongest bonds as possible, so you dumb down your thinking to match what is normative. When you are looking for a mate, however, you are making exclusionary choices to get the best genetic combination in a compatible partner- it is important to flesh out exactly what you like and what makes you specificly also social IQ correlates to IQ, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 08:14 PM
0

no, I live in the pacific northwest. The fact you think I'm from texas shows how stupid people are universal if you can't give proof, I can safely disregard you
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 08:08 PM
1

I am not trying to convince people to fuck me in this op
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 08:07 PM
0

Ok, none of those things mark somebody as stupid. However, by not listing intelligent things and listing this as their hobbies, they are marking themselves as stupid. Beer numbs intelligence. Parties are basically settings for having sex and doing stupid things. Music is a euphenism for going to concerts, which are another form of party. The common thread is "stupid"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:59 PM
1

when you're dating, you want someone of equal of higher intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:53 PM
0

Men are interested in having as many seeds as possible and fucking everything that moves. Of course they are going to hit everything, and it is also true that men are statistically threatened by intelligent women. HOWEVER, women are the gatekeepers and by putting intelligence up as a criteria they are screening for higher-value mates. Because nobody on tinder does this, there aren't many smart women on the platform
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:47 PM
-1

Memey answer. Tinder is the dominant dating app. People who have sex are, consciously or not, still looking for evolutionary good partners. It thereby follows that even though nobody is going to talk about proust, displaying high-value interests will get you a high-value mate. Because this isn't happening, I am deducing tinder women are basically morons E: What is funny, is that you are actually peacocking while probably not recognizing it. Username is verbose but feminine, you drop references t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:42 PM
1

very clever to try and reflect the question and thereby pretend you have the answers. I don't think geography plays a deciding factor when you look at white women in north america. The only obvious time I've seen this as significant is in the eastern US megacities where they're feminists and have smart majors. But this is a pretty superficial thing, since the underlying expression of stupid women on tinder is almost universal despite being expressed in different hobbies (EG: some girls over here…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:40 PM
1

I knew somebody would try and fixate on this. Computers require a great deal of intelligence and understanding to operate if you aren't using normie software- I am NOT interested in the back end at all, but understand it is a good predictor of intelligence also the NPC meme is memey
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:37 PM
1

That seems sensible. However, I do not understand why downplaying intelligence would be necessarily part of this- since it is in the benefit of the woman to seek smart men for higher earnings. You don't specifically have to say niche things to show you're smart- it can be reflected in typing style (for instance, women who emphasize grammar in their profiles are peacocking), in simply mentioning they like any type of smart thing, in how they choose to present their profile pictures. I don't think…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:35 PM
1

I like that answer, but why? If women are trying to get high value mates, they should be trying to peacock intelligence to also get smarter mates. Why wouldn't they want to do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:31 PM
1

are you going to cite specific differences in culture across north america that is relevant? The biggest differences in behavior today are across racial lines, otherwise there is almost no difference
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:30 PM
2

can you specifically prove ESFJ's are stupid? Last I looked, intelligence correlated to sociabillity
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 07:28 PM
0

North American culture is almost homogenous now. I don't think there's a lot of difference in seattle or toronto or texas in interests among whites at this point. And if you look at r4r, that is across the world and women seem to type basically the same interests. Anyways, where do you think the smart women are at?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:45 PM
0

I gave some examples. Interest in academic stuff, in reading (women like to mention literature or specific books), computerrs, philosophy, science. I don't know if maturity actually is a sign of intelligence, although I treat it as such. The difference is that an immature profile is very excited and talks about short-term stuff or popular culture
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:41 PM
-2

I gave some examples. Interest in academic stuff, in reading (women like to mention literature or specific books), computerrs, philosophy, science. I don't know if maturity actually is a sign of intelligence, although I treat it as such. The difference is that an immature profile is very excited and talks about short-term stuff or popular culture
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:41 PM
1

You might be right, I'm using masculine concepts of intelligence as my metric. So what does "female intelligence" look like? And how is it not just dumbed-down versions of what I was citing?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:36 PM
1

I gave some flags in the edit of my post. The whole reason /u/iamverysmart tier stuff exists is that using needlessly complicated language is actually a way to mark your intelligence. Generally mates seek people of equal IQ, so women would definitely flag themselves as smart if they were. And you do see this in some profiles, just not many Outdoor stuff seems neutral to me. It might even be a correlate for maturity which associates with intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:34 PM
-1

Alright, but the same kind of thing happened when I checked out dating sites such as OKC or POF. The women are obviously looking for an LTR, the common interest listing was stuff like "music, friends, beer, parties!"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:28 PM
0

yeah, I'm on the pacific coast of north america and in a small town. However, most women do not list political beliefs so this isn't an obvious factor. What do you think differs in other North American communities?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:25 PM
-1

vocabulary is a very good predictor of intelligence. And dating profiles are a form of cover letter. If someone isn't going to highlight intelligent things as an interest, I think it is accurate to judge they aren't interested e: smart things- like reading, like computers, like academics in some form, like philosophy, etc. All these are activities which associate with intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:18 PM
-2

Yes, you can. Profiles are a direct representation of how people view and want to show themselves. I'm going to say this once. You, and ever other person ITT who seems to think calling me a LMAO RETARD is an argument, is actually validating my perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 06:15 PM
3

Why on earth does Italy have such a high IQ?
/r/PussyPass24/02/17 05:19 AM
1

that's a really interesting perspective. Is the "bitter incels" stereotype real after all?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 04:29 PM
1

can you demonstrate concrete instances of conspiracy theory nonsense?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:28 PM
2

I'd be interested in learning about these shared traits if you feel so inclined to speak on them
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:03 PM
1

Thanks for the tip! Now you need to tell me things I don't know and give me some evidence!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 05:36 PM
1

can you specifically give examples of TRP that is "tainted"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 05:28 PM
3

So you're saying there's no evolutionary benefit to have a high-status or fertile mate when those are generally the best indicators of having successful child rearing? Seems rather counter-intuitive
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 05:07 PM
5

I would argue arranged marriages are potentially far more status-oriented than love based relationships. After all, the parents are explicitly basing the organization on social status
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 05:04 PM
0

organize a protest and call the shit out. Use it as a platform to generalize your complaints. That's what I'd do
/r/MensRights20/11/16 06:56 PM
1

this is the sort of indiscretion which should begat a lawsuit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/16 06:45 PM
6

doesn't this actually justify his opinion?
/r/MensRights11/09/16 05:09 AM
1

this is like 101 level sociology
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 05:22 PM
2

expecting a glamor magazine to have consistent standards besides audience appeal is reaching it is funny that feminists (I've met) ignore striking the fruit closest to home however
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:00 AM
1

naturally
/r/MensRights03/08/16 03:50 AM
-1

destroying a good thing. I'd much rather gendered study lounges than mixed personally
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:37 AM
5

this is a great reply I wish I'd read prior to commenting
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:50 AM
1

I'd like to point out that this statistic still looks well on course to have a 30% odd number above 60's level divorces over time
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:49 AM
1

the local area is small and rather stagnant, and I don't have a big circle of friends or very mainstream beliefs. But even then, I'd find myself meeting girls that I should seemingly have a connection with on paper but in reality we didn't seem to share interests, you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 08:38 PM
1

It's true I'm being pretentious here. Fashion and music could be an interest, but it would require a cognitive component and an active role in thinking about it. For instance, if all you did was listen to music is that truly shared? You're just listening to music, and even if you talk about it there's not much you can actually say besides "I like it" effectively. You'd have to both have an interest in that specific type of music to form a discussion as to what is good or bad about it. This is ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 04:14 PM
1

I gave drinking as an example. Or television, or dating in general really. Activities you could do with effectively anyone and bond regardless of how much you connect on that basis Maybe I'm full of it. But it is something I've noticed
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 04:07 PM
1

something that can be talked about at length with nuance. For instance, everybody shits. Is this a shared interest? You don't really have much connection to talk about, it's purely biological. There's no cognitive content to it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 04:03 PM
0

the point I am making is that many shared interests are seem to be superficial or don't go deep
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 03:53 PM
6

what the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:54 PM
5

It really doesn't matter if the teacher is overqualified for their position. If anything it just means they're more capable the BLS stats don't seem particularly damming, insofar as I see it seems to group high school education as a general practice than by field. It's true men are dominant in resource and technical industries, but this does not imply women are totally irrelevant in the work they do. There'd be no demand for it otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 08:04 PM
3

I'm trying to find statistics to validate/invalidate what you're talking about but it isn't readily available. Can you show something demonstrating your point? Certainly languages, English and art have their benefits. Their dominance in elementary education in particular is undeniably of value. There's not many jobs in higher education for feminist sjw's, and conventional education is still basically staple. What's shit about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:49 PM
6

Social work is not just the "war on poverty". Early childhood education, health care, and clerical labor is all relevant. Blame the programs not the workers in any case "but women don't teach REAL knowledge" can you demonstrate any of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:36 PM
3

education and social work are both traditional female gender roles and productive for society
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:31 PM
1

I used to literally lift rice bags so I sympathize
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 05:04 AM
11

when reddit dies, I'll laugh my way back to the imageboards
/r/TheRedPill13/05/16 05:39 AM
2

can we start calling feminism a social construct?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 05:09 AM
1

what pisses me off is the fact that he didn't leave the moment she dumped him
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 04:45 AM
3

le party of intelligence
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:23 AM
1

still can't tell if they've set this up as another gib monies plea
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:20 AM
3

I'm confused where you're going with this , or why you would be a blue pill given you're not a retard and leftism is the sex quo these days "feminism has become a political correct way of validating female loathing for socially inferior males" etc
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 03:47 AM
2

I can't wait for democrats to wreck their "party of science" mythology with stuff like this
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:14 AM
1

Here's to hoping she gets the nomination so the rest of us can tear the liberals to pieces over it
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:12 PM
1

really, I'd be much happier with an invasion of gender studies and neutering the whole program down into something relevant
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:18 AM
1

I dunno, that sounds like a shot at fairly easy sex to me
/r/TheRedPill21/04/16 05:06 AM
4

we should really be organizing social issue protests against Trudeau. The liberals are dying to avoid and spin away controversy. Early election would be a great time to start pressuring and outright challenging feminist lies in an attempt to push the government to cater to male issues.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:21 AM
8

facebook has been dying for a while now. They're going to alienate the young generation no matter how they play this one
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:08 AM
1

this keeps getting worse and worse
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 01:51 AM
1

the internet always had totalitarian potential. Activists of all stripes are the ones pushing the boundaries right now
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:42 PM
1

well. I suppose it really depends on the interpretation you want to be batting for. If you're with hard biology/gender differences are real you'd say the male murder rate is an inherent byproduct and programs designed to undermine male identity is part of the problem. I don't know what the alternative argument that can coherently stand against "toxic masculinity" would be
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:10 AM
1

if these figures aren't faked, I don't see the problem aside the editorializing. Men do commit the majority of rapes, violent crime, murders. That is just a fact. This "toxic masculinity" stuff however is classic sociology bullshit totally unconnected to solving the problem, and you should call them out on that I would post an anonymous reply glued in a vital place so they can't just tear it off. Start a conversation. If they take it down take the poster down edit: it is also possible to use a p…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:25 AM
-10

AVFM can die with the mainstream anyways, it's the people who become politically active and tune in to spread their views personally who really mean business
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:29 AM
1

well yeah, but you can freely politicize and abuse the concept to reveal them as academic charlatans. Totally doable
/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:52 PM
1

a fun approach to dealing with this would be to brigade the most egregious speakers in their classes, organize sit-ins on gender equality, and use the very equality charter citations feminists used to inch into the institutions against them to dismantle the joke associations they have become
/r/MensRights06/04/16 04:49 AM
1

soon to claim harassment and gain perpetual victimbux after the evil misogynists raped her story
/r/MensRights27/03/16 04:54 AM
2

terrible. As patriarchy grows stronger, the rape count gets more and more underreported
/r/MensRights26/03/16 02:23 AM
3

vid was such cringe I actually had to shut it off 5 seconds in Feminists represent a female reproductive viewpoint, which has never truly wanted to have sex with every man and has always been selective. The talk of female sex drives being active is just a way to frame their more active gouging of the sexual market as it skews in their favor. Every petty disagreement becomes a way of spinning a new controversy to keep the machine going. Blaming birth control is just another faucet of a very tired…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 08:22 PM
1

this is a good opportunity to act pious and victimized while aggressively shoving said evidence in everyone's face apolitical marches and mass petitions for shaming would be prudent
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 09:37 PM
0

This is needlessly controlling and will deform the woman to have a less developed personality and thereby less to contribute to society's betterment. A workable gender partition has to give women (and men) benefits for conforming, not just a metaphorical burqa
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:47 PM
0

I agree, but most men aren't great thinkers either. The obsessive competitiveness and tendency towards physical strength/characteristics associated with it as a criteria for mating success can lead men into an economically backward situation
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:36 PM
1

Men have historically always been left to fend for themselves. As in other posts, while I don't deny that an elite of men succeed widely, this is not the case for the majority. It's a pyramid weighted more heavily towards the bottom than women, who cluster more together (speculation, although I swear I've seen a paper explaining this to be correct)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:34 PM
1

"Men do better than women in the economy" wagegap is bullshit and I would have thought everyone here would be aware of it. The fact that women select easy jobs is irrelevant in the conversation here, what I'm talking about is the fact that men have a more competitive gender dynamic and many fail because of it. Comparing the elite as if it were representative of a majority is inaccurate
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 04:32 PM
2

okay great can you give citations for that statement. Women engage in more collective herd behavior when it comes to development. There's more social pressure to conform to what the other girls are doing, which is typically developmentally focused since women tend to prefer orderly less risk-averse behavior. I am not saying this produces breakaway innovation, I'm saying that in general more women are getting a college degree because of it Males by contrast, have followed a competitive mode of de…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 10:19 AM
4

my cents: Males are, as a gender, are less adapted to succeed career-wise in the economy. They are less organized than women, do poorer in school and academics (women have more college degrees), are often led astray by addictive products marketed specifically to them (like video games, drugs or alcohol, etc), and are so often feuding with each other that intelligence takes a back seat in gendered mate selection I doubt modern society in particular is more uncaring about men than previous ones ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 09:24 AM
1

they probably have a charter of rights; I'm sure political moves like this could be struck down easily groups gain attention by looking unfairly victimized
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 10:49 PM
-1

don't have the patience to scan the thread besides it being productive. "red pill" types seem geared towards courting slutty women. It could actually be that the girls they're picking up off the street are the 10% with high partner count
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 04:25 AM
0

statistics generalize what a whole population is like without applying to any one person. I can ask broad questions in the same brushstroke what's your experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 08:10 PM
9

it's actually kind of funny to hear 18 year old kids talk shit about how watching youtube videos "changed their life" I don't see anything in the way or proof here, dude. There was a BBC documentary on dating/love that actually had a bunch of PUA guys participate in their experiments who bombed out terribly because their methods were so inefficient. It's fun to go around giving people simplistic pecking order names, but I don't see any evidence provided here other than pictures of women we have …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 07:51 PM
2

I never heard any complaining about this nice guys business until the internet came along. Women or authority figures gave no dating advice one way or the other at all
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 06:15 AM
1

I remember reading somewhere that evidence suggests men are actually more romantically inclined than women? Makes a bit of sense, given they're generally less picky I have no idea what to say about this oxytocin bullshit since the chemical is released for both genders after sex
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 04:56 AM
2

I don't remember tagging it as anything, uh..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 08:27 PM
1

the only significant structural change is the internet and computers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 11:23 PM
1

it's a political talking point to defend against allegations of misandry. I've never heard of a feminist talking a boys or "gender neutral" issue
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 05:18 AM
1

chimps in the wild have been known to commit rape as a mating strategy if they have no chances otherwise. Obviously, violence has been a male-patterned behavior since inception... but rape is usually characteristic as an act of desperation. Attempts to control partner reproductive behavior to prevent cheating is very, very masculine and there's no point in lying about it. Stable sexual relationships with multiple partners in a position of control is probably the optimal configuration for a man. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 07:37 AM
1

I think you'd be looking for fashion subs, which are endemic
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 12:03 PM
0

evidence seems to show people actually grow happier with choices they can't control. I'd speculate that the statistics for arranged marriage couples being happy probably transfers over to similarly fixed marriages generally but you're right, this can be a real problem for things like spousal abuse
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 11:24 AM
1

This is like, the most shittiest level of do-it-yourself psychological analysis. Give me citations for anything you've just said, you jokers. Define what mentally damaged is too while you're at it, because it sounds like you're not talking about neuroscience with this bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 08:26 PM
3

they're both circlejerks from my impression, although I'm not a regular on either. From what I've seen, TRP-style philosphy seems to obsess over female promiscuity to the point of absurd denigration. For instance, the famed statistic about ~50% of marriage ending in divorce is 1) actually declining and 2) closer to 80% when you limit subjects to college educated couples woh marry after 27. Similarly, female self-report evidence suggests women only list wanting ~6 sexual partners in a lifetime in…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 05:56 AM
-1

I'm pretty confident the problem here is the BP takes shit instead of dishing it out. Women don't have a evolutionary incentive to be polyamorous once they've settled down and seriously, just look at the data because there is no arguing about the happiness thing. Men get more benefits from marriage/relationships on average than women do. It's just the question of whether you hold your own as the dominant partner or not
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 12:35 PM
-7

you guys should really re-think your view on marraige. Love is pretty much the sole corrolate to male happiness if you look at the statistics http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/5/2/harvard-happiness-study/ "men get the most from marriage" is not just BP horseshit. It's the fucking truth. Bizarre that the subreddit that prides itself on being educated should stick it's head in the sand about things so obvious
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 08:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter