I think the problem is twofold, but mainly rooted in conflict theory 1) Firstly, accadamia has many professorships and departments run by those with similar mindsets, who then hire others with similar mindsets. From this, academic gender theory is largely shaped by a psuedoMarxist philosophy. In this philosophy, all that matters is the historical conflict between two groups for materials. Hence, men become the "bougious" oppressors in conflict against female "proletariat". This conflict theory a…
That's what I hate. Why does it have to be antagonistic? Why is anyone making "moves" against anyone else? I hate how people want to form "teams" based on gender. This isn't a zero sum game!