TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ValZho Archive

View 1 posts and 13 comments by ValZho on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

ValZho/r/MGTOW01/12/17 11:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

you need to be married to be a pastor right? This likely depends largely on the church/denomination and their interpretation of Titus 1:6. Does it mean to say that being a husband is a requirement for leadership (as a married man, I can absolutely see some wisdom in this), or does it just mean that if you are married you should be faithful to your wife? I definitely lean towards the latter interpretation, but I could probably be convinced either way.
/r/MGTOW14/12/18 03:43 PM
7

"And with these charges I just don't see how I'm ever getting my kids back." Are you kidding me?!?!?!
/r/MGTOW07/11/18 04:50 PM
2

the other 50% just seems like subjective English rules ignoring its own form and function What, specifically, are you referring to here?
/r/MGTOW07/11/17 07:41 PM
5

Children is already the plural of child, so no need to pluralize it again with s-apostrophe -- children's is correct. Also, the entire list is in past-tense, so believed is also correct... with that, though, 'become" and "come" should be "became" and "came" respectively.
/r/MGTOW07/11/17 01:57 PM
7

Yeah, the current culture is extremely toxic towards men. Overemphasis on "love" (and a worldly definition of love at that which emphasizes a person's lusts and greeds rather than their needs and holiness) which is what women need and men are commanded to give unconditionally to their wives — but less than zero emphasis (i.e., discouragement) of the reciprocal unconditional respect that women are commanded to give to their husbands. If any of you are married Christian men, then I definitely reco…
/r/MGTOW04/10/17 07:48 PM
1

Soy products cause extra estrogen production Close, but no. Soy contains a lot of phytoestrogens (plant estrogens). It's not that they cause your body to make more estrogen, it's that the phytoestrogen that gets absorbed can both mimic your body's estrogen and act as an estrogen antagonist... read: phytoestrogens jack with your endocrine system. Bottom line: avoid eating unfermented soy products.
/r/MGTOW28/08/17 10:00 PM
2

An idea for anyone getting into a similar situation... Guy should have replied with something like: "Aren't you being a misandristic cow? Turnabout is fair play, after all. At least weight can be changed; height can't — who's being more unreasonable?
/r/MGTOW28/04/17 10:11 PM
1

I can't help but read it as "Mugato" ... like the villain from Zoolander.
/r/MGTOW17/04/17 09:29 PM
1

Would you say it has a different prose? Figuring that out is a bit beyond my abilities/training!
/r/MGTOW31/03/17 01:17 PM
1

Prepositions can be pretty squirrely between dialects. The verb "bother" usually selects for the preposition "with", i.e., "don't bother with swiping right" or no preposition, i.e., "don't bother swiping right". It seems, though, that there's a fair amount of "don't bother on" and "don't bother about" out there, too (from what I can tell with a quick Google search). The latter two are still in the in the vast minority of attestation, but maybe it's indicative of the early stages of a shift in En…
/r/MGTOW31/03/17 01:15 PM
1

Yeah ... I wondered if anyone would say something! ;) Although these types of phrases aren't really uncommon in this sort of situation, so I don't think you can be too hard on a person for that. Personally, I would interpret this type of structure as kind of an extended list... something like: "I am attribute A, attribute B, attribute C, etc." getting written in the much easier to parse: I am: Attribute A Attribute B Attribute C etc. where "I am" is optional in the second structure. The bullet p…
/r/MGTOW31/03/17 01:00 PM
12

Technically, this isn't a run-on sentence. It's possible that it's not even incorrect; it's just really poorly worded. If you flip around the noun phrases, I think you can see what she's going for: "Really fun and outgoing woman with very intellectual conversation and a sense of humor." Although, I would never describe someone as "with" intellectual conversation but, rather, "capable of" or "proficient in" or "who enjoys" intellectual conversation. The spirit of your post absolutely stands, thou…
/r/MGTOW29/03/17 07:41 PM
2

"use it or loose it"... Typo, or incredibly clever? :)
/r/MGTOW27/02/17 03:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter