TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ValuableBreakfast527 Archive

View 5 posts and 52 comments by ValuableBreakfast527 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Motherfucka you first came out the gate swingin wildly And you still got nerves to say the habit of attacking the intelligence of those you cannot honestly refute. You schizo or sumn??? Seriously Imma start trollin your ass from here on lmfao
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 05:17 PM
0

Lmfao are you a teenager or sumn? You really trying too hard on here and it's getting boring You can write more tho, I'm trying to get in some laugh pills lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 05:15 PM
0

Dude you sound so triggered over a random typo Try hoppin off the Internet for a while lmfao
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 04:45 PM
0

A typo again
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 04:44 PM
1

Btw I made a very serious typo so you can leave that aside a
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 10:48 AM
0

If you think humans are not predictable then you are too unobservant to function. The reason why humanity has risen to global supremacy is because we are very predictably communal, cooperative, and social animals. We very predictably go out of our way to connect with and help other humans, so much so we have built the At least we're relatively unpredictable??
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 10:48 AM
0

I just realized that was a typo on my part. My answer was supposed to be that: Whether man or woman, I'll still prefer a bear on my property. Cause humans, in general are fundamentally unpredictable
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 10:41 AM
0

You failed. This is both needlessly long and borderline incoherent That was sarcasm You're visibly more focused on this tedious theater kid attention seeking crap than writing anything approaching a coherent argument. Dude you sound so triggered lmfao You negated the premise. The question is not whether you would prefer a man or a bear on your property, but in the woods. No you're just retardedly wrong that it's laughable Whether "woods" or "property", the form of the question is in a case of en…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 10:38 AM
-9

I'll reply to everything here tomorrow Kinda sleepy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 08:01 PM
0

No, I agree with you I just think it's one of those instances of using a truth to tell a lie
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 08:00 PM
-9

I respond to this tomorrow Just hope this post remains relevant
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 07:58 PM
1

Where the hell did all that come from lmfao
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 07:57 PM
-10

but you're missing the point of the hypothetical, which is to paint men as predators I understand.. that's the point of the post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 07:51 PM
–

No I'm saying Nice guys do the same thing everyone does Just that they do it less bad —the irony
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 03:42 PM
1

People flipping after they don't get what they want is a normal thing For instance people who'd ghost you after they get rejected when they were so connected and all that That you chose to focus on a specific case ironically proves my point
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 03:02 PM
0

All this that misses the post's point aside NiceX vs BadX, who is more "selfish"?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 07:01 AM
2

there is a reason why manipulators don’t often keep strong bonds or relationships - they eventually get caught. This is a cope —just world fallacy — "the bad guys'll eventually get what's coming to them" Dear, that only works in movies, not in reality It's more likely that they DON'T WANT strong bonds or relationships in the first place lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 05:40 AM
2

the key to being a successful manipulator is to make the other person think they’re not being manipulated. AKA; Be a better manipulator You're just making my point for me that I don't even know why I'm even replying
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 07:01 PM
5

No, they observe that assholes get more success Are they correct, yes or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:34 PM
5

"You don't believe God exists but a lot of people do, that's ok" Unironically, that's okay —the ubiquity of delusion is a normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:19 PM
5

I argued why it's wrong You're simply stating your opinion —I'm right; you're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:16 PM
1

Cause someone who fails at evil, owning to traits or lack of traits in them, is less evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:15 PM
1

Of course they're "better"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:10 PM
2

Of course people can be genuinely nice they just never seem to be the same people talking about how nice they are. These are 2 different people. Uuuhhmm,if you read my comment you'll realize I rejected that distinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:10 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:09 PM
1

AKA, people who have less manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:08 PM
4

So we can come to the conclusion that the observation made by nice guys is correct? Yes or no
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:08 PM
5

That's demonstrably false, not "spinning" anything Manipulation is a key trait associated with dark traits like psychopathy, machiavellianism. So it makes rational sense that assholes are more manipulative
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:00 PM
2

To point it out on the chance some people might read this and go “Damn, it’s never gonna work. I need to stop believing it will and start actually trying something else/figure out what works/start actually being nice, etc” Mission failed successfully then Cause what you've only succeeded in doing is: Validating the point of my post to said people. Showing said people you're wrong. Showing said people that you're incapable to maintain a convo.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:51 PM
2

No you're not understanding anything here But do answer the question Why did you respond here???
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:49 PM
2

I already refuted this elsewhere, I'll link it: EDIT: Firstly, it's a common trope that niceguys think that being nice would get em laid And your comments seem to be working under this implicit assumption that someone cannot be genuinely nice and still want to play games towards dating (remember I said dating is essentially a game, especially deception game) I reject that premise as false, and ironically, a niceguy mindset to have: Someone can still be genuinely nice, and still desire sex(yes, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:48 PM
1

Once again: you aren’t going to “convince people” the reality isn’t the reality I didn't even need to convince you —I refuted your copium arguments so fast that you've to resort to takin cheapshots like this and grasp at straws inorder to avoid the fact that gasp! you may be wrong —I've shown you the abyss, and you're trying to do eye-sign language with the abyss not to stare back. At this point I'll happily engage in mockery
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:48 PM
7

No. NiceGuys™ are worse than straight up assholes I'll 📌 that. With the NG™ there's some pretending, some manipulation,some hiding. He's also an asshole, but tries to hide it (often failing miserably). I'll first counter this on ground that I supposedly accept it,then my second comment will demonstrate why this is false. i.e why niceguys don't pretend. So an asshole is someone who is traits commonly associated with bad people... especially manipulation. Who is higher in manipulation? The niceguy…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:45 PM
6

Humans — let’s be real, men —- have to be good enough to get along with each other and raise kids that survive I'm saying that "getting along" and all that requires the opposite/un-relations of "nice" traits This "common denominator" argument is def not gonna work
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:42 PM
3

Plus if there's 'nothing to engage ' Why the hell did you even care to respond to this post? Probably to demonstrate some moral superiority?.. I'm asking this cause it's obvious that anything pass this point will be an ass whoopin for you
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:40 PM
1

Winning the lottery is a better money maker “sometimes” than just praying and waiting for money to appear "Good way" to make a living is a cope in this context, an unironically niceguy way of thinking God you're definitely not following the argument Why the hell did you even respond to this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:39 PM
1

There is nothing TO engage. Or YOU are unable to see anything to engage Intellectual handicappin is not all that uncommon.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:37 PM
3

You are basically implying that we should A strawman from the beginning, yikes —quite ironic for "addressing pseudo -philosophical.." If you're adept enough to discern that which is "real" philosophy, then you'd realize that second half is descriptive, NOT prescriptive —I'm discussing what human ARE, not what they SHOULD DO. The irony... under a post already highlighting an irony. Let's do continue tho: cut people who are nice solely to further their own agenda and not out of any genuine sense o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:36 PM
3

It actually doesn’t work most times. It just works better than being a “niceguy”. Precisely my point, so we can 📌 that. See, this is still “but they are pretending to be nice so its better!” Excuses. I've already argued why this is false,so you better go back and address it lol No it’s not. It’s just trying to be manipulative and people see thru it. And post it. Here we go again.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:30 PM
7

No i read the post, it just doesn’t take away the reality trying to force “but Askshyl” into it. This "but askshyl" thing is an attempt at sarcasm when someone finds out that their lack of conversational depth and potential strawmanning has been pointed out. Note that I've actually addressed everything single thing you said, and you have no response. I've read the rest of your comment and you seem to be, not unwilling to engage, but UNABLE TO engage At this point I might just wait for the first …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:27 PM
1

Fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:15 PM
6

Does being the asshole work sometimes Edit: it works most times. Does being the asshole work sometimes. Yes Does being the “niceguy” work as much? No cause people can see thru it. Or people just prefer evil people. It's a much simpler explanation and less woo explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:13 PM
4

No: they are just assholes pretending to be nice. How exactly do you know this? Infact list all traits of the stereotypical nice guy, Cause you seem to be avoiding an obvious conclusion, and this just the beginning mean- at least with the straight up ass you know exactly who they are and what you are getting. No games, no trying to be someone they aren’t, And I already disagree with everything.. that was quite fast! Firstly, it's a common trope that niceguys think that being nice would get em la…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 03:12 PM
0

The whole point of the term is irony. Looks like you didn't even read this post , cause if you did, You'll realize the true meta-irony is "nice guys"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 02:58 PM
4

The “nice” person isn’t actually nice: they are pretending to be nice but failing at it. Let's ask a question: Are they nicer than assholes? Yes or no.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 02:57 PM
5

If you have to constantly tell everyone you’re “nice”…you’re probably not very nice. That wasn't the point of the post. But even if that's the point, I reject this as false. And it's an ironic double standard —when someone says they're "attractive" for example, people, for the mosy part, laud it as "confidence " and all thay jazz No one says, "you're probably not very attractive" Yikes
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 02:56 PM
2

Every time I mention the GA word people get scared (Cough cough the GA word is gender abolishment). Even most progressive people or people on the left are afraid the of the GA word. Because the GA word change the status quo. And especially when it comes to men and traditional gender roles. Do you think this might be an unconscious reason behind TERFS? Transgenderism is just a step to gender nihilism. And about the Will Smith toxic masculinity stuff, that's hilarious to me, why? Cause i NEVER cam…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/24 12:38 PM
3

Take "religion" as an example. Religion exists, to be sure, but good luck getting a hard and fast definition that manages to encompass everything or even just most things we think of as a religion without including tons of things that aren't religions by any stretch And I think this may be an issue I have with social sciences, that lack of precision in definitions is antithetical to the science practice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 11:34 PM
18

Yeah, Scott has always been way ahead of his time Like fuck, that MF must've been some time traveling thinker
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 04:33 PM
67

This dude perfectly elucidated it: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-romanceless/ The comment section is a relic
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/24 12:00 PM
1

People oughta be incentivized against war
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/24 04:30 AM
1

I upvoted this not cause I agree, But cause you pulled up from a bias I was momentarily falling into when reading the OP post Jeez.. critical thinking is so hard
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/24 10:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter