TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VanillaSoul Archive

View 13 posts and 44 comments by VanillaSoul on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
175

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:53 PM
127

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:17 PM
66

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:14 PM
22

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:07 PM
20

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:06 PM
19

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:05 PM
18

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:57 AM
16

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:42 PM
13

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights29/07/12 08:41 PM
13

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights06/09/12 11:23 PM
8

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:35 PM
6

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:35 PM
5

VanillaSoul/r/MensRights28/07/12 09:18 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Not if you've been a victim, or come close to being a victim, of this system.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:51 AM
10

I skimmed this article and learned it was a case in South Carolina. Then, I began paying attention and instinctively knew the adoption attorney was Ray Godwin. Sure enough, it was him who handled this case. Just this year, I successfully defended a termination of parental rights and adoption case against this lawyer. I won't disclose the details because the Court records are sealed. However, I will say his reputation in this jurisdiction is questionable among other attorneys. He's been referred …
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:47 AM
26

It is well understood that a person can't pay if they don't have enough money to live. You're assuming the Family Courts and Child Support Enforcement have compassion for the non-custodial parents who are obligated to pay support beyond their means, and the system uses sound reasoning when determining the ability to pay and the willful failure to pay. It is well documented that the Courts may follow the law, but the result is not always "a person can't pay if they don't have enough money to live…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:54 PM
10

Had he gone to his court date and offered even $50 towards his arrears, they wouldn't have locked him up. This is NOT necessarily true. No one knows exactly what a SC family court judge will do. SC has a history of denying rights of (NCP) non-custodial parents. See the US Supreme Court case Turner v. Rodgers. Most SC family court focus on the ability to pay. Thus, if a defendant willfully had the ability to pay (meaning he was in good health and didn't work; or he worked but didn't pay the full …
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:44 PM
2

This action may be legal under Federal Law SSA Title IV-D. Tax refund offset is legal with proper notice. i.e., a letter in the mail.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 12:59 AM
2

Men do not have reproductive rights, so they do not have a duty to support. Arguing that men do not have a duty to support their children is a losing battle.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 11:38 AM
8

I'm not a lawyer. It is likely this man's case is a DSS Title IV-D case. The state comes after him if the mother is on any form a welfare. The feds give monetary incentives to the states to collect child support. For every dollar the state collects, the feds give them a money based on a percentage. Also, because the alleged father did not know the law, or have an attorney, he did not file the right motions or respond to any complaint or summons and thus was judged by default. This happens to a l…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:50 PM
7

I prefer to throw out a net and then throw back the ones I don't want. That's what I do when I'm shrimping.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/13 07:42 PM
3

Actually NO. For punching someone, the correct legal term is battery. Assault is: >an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:12 AM
2

I totally agree with you. Women dominate the HR departments.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:53 PM
1

I haven't heard or listened to the entire debate yet. But a word of caution about the CATO institute is that it is an American [right-wing conservative think-tank] (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/cato-institute). Please keep this in mind when listening to the debate if your ideological leanings are more centrist or to the left. That is all.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:41 PM
0

Thank you. I agree with you. Men's Rights should not be about hating women.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:29 PM
1

Family courts are rife with tales where men with off-the-books jobs cry poor mouth to the judge, only to drive away in a Mercedes. I'd like to see the author's source for this statement of fact. I, for one, do not believe her statement and believe it is a tall "tale.'
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:38 PM
2

Bottom line: I dislike any special treatment because of gender. That includes women as well as men. Discrimination works both ways and I don't by into the academic viewpoint that those in the majority power group cannot suffer from discrimination because of their status. And I refuse any politically correct name or label society put on groups or anyone. In the words of MLKjr., we must judge people on the content of their character.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:37 PM
0

Why do you expect me to explain it to you? Don't you "get it?" Please quit trolling in Men's Rights and go back to to your feminist sisters and enjoy the men bashing.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:47 AM
–

Are you trying to put words in my mouth? Only an idiot would come to the conclusion that I believe that. My question for you: how stupid can you be?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:56 PM
–

The wisdom of Dave Chappell, to paraphrase, "If you dress like a cop, and act like a cop, then people will think you're a cop...." In other words, if you dress like a slut, and act like a slut, then people will think you're a slut....
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:55 PM
2

I never like Ann Coulter. But she sure knows how to stir up people's emotions. I, for one, do not want her to be a spokesperson for Men's Rights. I think we need someone with more integrity and more reputable than a political pundit.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:52 AM
2

I feel for you. Yes, women and mothers determine the role a man or father will have in the child's life. Its unfortunate and unfair but its reality. Remember this, you are worth more than just your worst mistake. In other words, don't let your mistakes define who you are. And you don't have to have a woman, wife or girlfriend, in your life to give your life meaning. Once you realize this and practice it, you'll begin to notice how you'll repel all the women who are out to manipulate and suck you…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:35 PM
7

Typical politician pandering to get votes.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:26 PM
8

I've been hit on by gays and women. I never thought they are would-be rapists.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:59 AM
–

The fact that this was on PostSecret indicates to me the problem is more prevalent than I think it is. I genuinely feel sorry for the guy, and I'm disgusted by the woman who did this.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:48 AM
3

More BS from TYT.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:03 PM
8

Its the writer's viewpoint that makes this article unsettling. She gives the female reader the opportunity to blow trivial matters out of proportion. Maybe if she had written the article in gender neutral language and pointed out the importance of picking your battles wisely it would have made more sense to me.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:12 PM
–

While I am glad she was sentenced to prison time, I still wonder if she got a slap on the wrist as compared to a male defendant. Also, it is likely the she will not serve the full 5 years. For example, she will probably get good time or work credits and thus only serve half of her sentence. Does anyone know Texas laws concerning truth in sentencing? Or does anyone know of a comparable case when the defendant was male and received a harsher sentence?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:16 PM
3

Even though you're in a difficult and sad situation, I'd say that legally you're sitting in the cat-bird seat.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:01 AM
4

This is definitely a men's rights issue. Unfortunately, I don't see it turning out well for the father
/r/MensRights14/08/12 04:03 AM
6

Another woman, the author Penny Young Nance, saying "Yes, men should man up...." God that just pisses me off. OK Penny. I'll man up. Go in the kitchen and fix me a sandwich! Her editorial is trash.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:08 PM
6

..and we all know that Google is now God.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:03 PM
1

The sad fact is that this is actually taught in college. When I attended the University of Michigan, I took a course called "Minority Groups." The professor, who was black, taught us that the group in power, white males, could not suffer discrimination. I call him out on such nonsense and, of course, I received a "C" in the course. BTW...all the exams were essay and therefore subjective for him.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:52 PM
3

You're getting some good advice here. Remember, you are in civil court, not a criminal court, so you have different rules. If you are accused of something, the burden of proof is on you to answer to the complaint. Never fail to answer any summons or you will be in default and lose. Also, you do not have a right to an attorney and due process is not as stringent as criminal court. Since you cannot afford an attorney to represent you, maybe you can at least afford a two hour consultation with a la…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:00 AM
1

You explained it much better than I did. Very good.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:16 PM
–

A relationship ends long before a physical separation. My psycho/social analysis of your situation; The reverse in traditional gender roles is causing her stress. As a child, she always expected to be the one staying home with the children. Her family, friends, and coworkers are probably telling her she's "married to a loser" because you don't work a regular job and thus you are not fulfilling the husband/father traditional role of provider and protector. In my opinion, your relationship is endi…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:30 AM
0

Will the SPLC ever go after Jewish groups who hate Palestinians? I think not.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:35 PM
3

I am not a lawyer and this may not be the correct procedure: If she doesn't put them on the plane, file a motion in your jurisdiction for contempt of custody. Then have a neutral party, i.e., sheriff or process server, in her county serve her court hearing notification. If she does not show for the hearing, a warrant may be issued for her arrest. Also, file a motion in her jurisdiction for contempt of custody and get a court date. Usually, the courts in her jurisdiction will enforce the custody …
/r/MensRights29/07/12 05:27 PM
1

Unfortunately, cases like these will probably never be heard at the Supreme Court even though contempt judgments like these violate due process. The judicial system will never relinquish contempt powers one iota. Our only hope is to persuade the other two branches to limit judicial power.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 05:04 PM
5

This sickens me and disgusts me. The story and TYT for laughing about it.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 04:33 PM
1

https://www.change.org/petitions/legislative-and-executive-branches-of-government-men-s-rights-in-family-matters#
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:23 AM
–

It seems to me that he would have a court order, or divorce decree, that stipulates his visitation rights. If that is the case, then he could file a complaint for contempt of visitation if he keeps a record of all attempts to see and contact his child.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:02 AM
–

Something does not seem right about your story. How can you have no visitation rights yet you are required to pay 70% of your income for child support. Please explain.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 09:09 PM
3

They are considered a minority in the academic sense. They are not the group in power according to the social structure. This is the definition put forth by professors in ivory towers-not mine.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:26 PM
2

We should not be sidetracked by bashing women yet we should call them out on their bullshit. The BS caveat: Minority groups, i.e., women, cannot be sexist because historically they are subjugated. Therefore, oppressed women cannot engage in hate speech, bigotry, discrimination and prejudice because it has little effect on the dominant group and is just a reaction to oppression by men. In my opinion, the aforementioned is BS put out by academia. Reverse discrimination is real.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:15 PM
–

This is so true. Stay-st-home-moms are seen as heroes and hard workers. Stay-at-home dads are seen as zeroes and lazy.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:37 PM
12

Turner v. Rogers 2011 SCOTUS decision show the family courts in SC do not follow due process. This is now common.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter