TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Various-Storm2143 Archive

View 1 post and 89 comments by Various-Storm2143 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

correct analysis
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:49 PM
0

lol not always “temporary and small”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:19 AM
5

why would an older woman take care of him better?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:18 AM
3

This started around the late 1990s to early 2000s in NYC (and all the major cities) especially due to atomization You can argue the female delusional issue was less likely until 2010s or so in the midwest/south this isn’t a unique gen z problem unlike your assertion and it isn’t worse it’s the same as it was since the late 1990s
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 01:54 PM
8

the problem is they “grow out of the delusion” at 35 plus and aren’t great suitable partners for the gainfully employed men around that age this is a raw deal for successful men at that point
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 01:52 PM
3

women in general had these hyper specific profiles on dating sites since aol dial up days this isn’t unique to gen z but it is very true
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 01:24 PM
5

lol it’s been like that since the late 1990 my friend this isn’t unique to gen z
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 01:08 PM
-4

you can’t be the beneficiary of your own trust unless it’s a DAPT in special states There is a 10 year look back clause for bankruptcy as well So this analysis is BS
/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:26 PM
1

good response
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 03:21 PM
1

good analysis
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 03:21 PM
7

This confirms this attitude has been prevalent since the 1990s
/r/MensRights04/06/23 12:55 PM
–

Same can be argued about women's demands for looks in men They don't care about male "health", they just want lean and muscular males even it requires steroids and/or extreme dieting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 12:02 PM
0

that’s all nonsense there are many layoffs happening throughout tech right now furthermore, the even at google etc the vast majority aren’t making high six figures
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 01:58 PM
0

most of the compensation is in stock option bonuses meta stock collapsed in the last few years ergo, most of that compensation wouldn’t exist furthermore, they are laying off a large segment of their workforce this year starting with highest paid first
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 01:50 PM
6

It makes sense for the "average" male to avoid marriage to women who: 1) Have >5 sexual partners 2) Was only interested in the "average" male in her late 20s to 30s Obviously she likely had sex with more attractive males and will feel she is "settling" for the average male. He will have a difficult time keeping her happy going forward long term. Hence the high divorce rates for these women when they hit their 40s
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 12:44 PM
1

I was making high six figures with over 7 figure net worth by mid to late 30s due to being a physician. That was after my 20s of making 40-70K/year in residency or so. There are very few tech jobs, etc that can pay anywhere near this and they are usually very unstable long term. So you are not in the top 1% for your age but top .1 to .01% at the high 6 figures for early 30s Ergo, I figure you are full of shit as most rational people would.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/23 12:39 PM
1

the whole story is bs
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 09:43 PM
7

Everyone on reddit makes "high 6 figures" in their early 30s brah Its normal lol This is why these posts cant be taken seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 06:47 PM
1

Yes but BMI is very accurate for female obesity and probably even understates it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 04:08 PM
1

Even if "ego" is a big component, why shouldn't an older successful guy do that? He obtains no value in an older woman compared to a younger woman if he can get the younger woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 03:43 PM
1

most honest answer it’s basically women who get older who play “trad” to find some beta bucks simp after they had their “fun”
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/23 09:48 PM
1

I don’t even get this sub What is a “redpill” woman How is a 35 year old woman “traditional”?
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/23 09:42 PM
1

Basically a true redpill woman gets married younger or has kids younger It’s like a born again virgin in the church at 35
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/23 09:39 PM
1

There is no such thing as a career woman going “redpill” at 35 That’s just a scam
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/23 09:35 PM
0

Why should childless men pay for single moms though? That is inherently stealing their resources whereby they get no benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 02:14 PM
0

Yet for women to have these "rights", men need to be infringed upon financially with taxes, etc. So someone's "rights" are going to be taken either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 02:03 PM
0

Then why arent feminists petitioning to end alimony?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 01:55 PM
0

i’m judging it by rates of alimony
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 01:25 PM
3

How many "religious" Christian women in in their 20s and with low N count while looking for marriage? Most are 30+ year old post wall/single moms/etc who become "born again" from my experience
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 12:21 PM
2

Most religious women dont join the church until 30+ and become "born again virgins" Its mostly a LARP How many younger Christian women in their 20s exist that are looking for marriage and have a low N count?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 12:20 PM
0

Modern women want traditional men still. They aren't looking for house husbands lol This isnt a serious take
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 12:17 PM
-1

most "christian" women sleep around in their 20s and become churchian again in their 30s as "born again virgins" ​ Its a scam
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 12:16 PM
1

That is true but those women are few in numbers in general Hence why marriage rates are at all time lows.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/22 12:15 PM
1

Yeah I mean mid 20s making >7 figures is statistically in the top .01% of income but I guess everyone on Reddit makes that and more. Very elite group. And even at such high income they apparently cant get women lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 10:52 PM
1

This is very accurate in all forms of life not just marriage This is the same with jobs, friendships, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 07:52 PM
3

very strange to me
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 07:35 PM
6

That guy you are talking to seems really low IQ lol Don't get the debate here. You are on point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 07:23 PM
2

Lifespans have been going down for the last 4 years and death in middle ages is way up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 06:58 PM
6

Everyone makes 1M+ in the mid 20s in NYC online lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 06:50 PM
3

Tinder just accentuates the already existing problem and makes it more “obvious”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 07:41 PM
2

cool story bro
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 05:55 PM
-1

I didn’t say they didn’t have sex. I’m saying they didn’t have the body counts of women today.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 03:14 PM
1

It wasnt ubiquitous among white middle class until the 1990s
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 03:03 PM
-2

That is correct. Feminist society allows women to be very rude to men and aren't held to accountability for doing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:51 PM
-2

AF/BB is the norm for all women who arent virgins after college. Women arent sleeping with "average" men during their "ho" phase
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:45 PM
-3

Yes men are the targets of the feminist media and have been demonized. That is why they feel justified in being rude to the average male.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:42 PM
3

Most 40+ year old men dont know the term MGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:41 PM
-1

Yes there are more unmarried women doing AF/BBs to far later ages.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:33 PM
5

I think they made it more obvious. Before that, women had more plausible deniability that allowed simps to believe there was no AF/BB going on when the women hit 30+.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:33 PM
1

Ok we can agree to disagree. But both would agree it started far before OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:32 PM
4

Possibly because the term "MGTOW" isnt known by 40+ year old men who arent into internet culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:32 PM
-10

That is false. Stronger men attacking weaker men who insult them is socially acceptable in the West. Men are not allowed to assault women under any construct in the West, even if she is a total bitch to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:27 PM
-2

Women like to be rude since they can get away with it towards men. Demonizing men gives them all kinds of social benefits including affirmative action, fake sex charges to get ahead at work, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:26 PM
4

They are not likely to be physically assaulted as the reason behind the underhanded comments. I can promise Arab men don't tolerate that shit in the Middle East.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:25 PM
5

Yes 22 in 1980s= women were married by end of college if they went to college= women were basically locked down by 19-20= far less hookup opportunity. By 1990 it jumped to 24 but by mid to late 90s it started going into the higher 20s, giving average woman far more hookup opps for AF/BBs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:22 PM
4

The real reason women are nastier is due to empowerment from feminism and social dynamics mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:21 PM
2

https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/hemez-distribution-age-first-marriage-fp-20-09.html
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:17 PM
-2

Women are rude in business/workplace as well when there is no sexual contact towards men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:15 PM
1

Its identical actually. Good analysis on how this used to apply to black men. Now it applies to all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:13 PM
-2

If women are so "avoidant" of men, why are their sexual counts so high? Women were far more "avoidant" of men 20+ years ago since they had far lower body counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:11 PM
-16

The largest reason is because: 1) Men arent allowed to physically attack women 2) Feminist construct since 1990s has made women into "victims". As a victim, they are allowed to be rude/assault/etc since "victims" can never be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:10 PM
3

Yes women will abuse men since the social construct allows for it due to: Unable to attack women physical Women under the feminist construct can claim "victim status". As a result, they are justified in being very dishonest/rude/nasty to random men. We live under this feminist construct since the 1990s
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:09 PM
4

There are plenty of dudes 40+ complaining with incel content such as "Grotesque Subhuman", Hammerhand, VentionMGTOW (who died), etc. There are more people in their 20s on youtube in general then 40+ making content so this isnt a valid argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:05 PM
5

So by that logic, women should be NICER to men since men aren't allowed to physically attack them on average? So your justification makes no sense. By this logic, weaker men should be the "rudest" since they are the ones in the MOST general danger in society not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:03 PM
0

"Hook up" was still small subset of women in the 1970s and expanded to the good majority of college women by the 1990s. If most women married by 20-21 even by the late 1980s, they would have usually been with their boyfriend for a 1-2 years at a minimum before marriage. The opportunity to "hook up" was minimized under these conditions compared to women waiting to marry until late 20s and now 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:02 PM
1

Most people do "irrational" things for emotional/physical dopamine releases and then post hoc justify them using "logic".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:00 PM
2

So by this logic, all the weaker men should be assholes/rude to stronger men as a defense mechanism?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 01:59 PM
6

The "fear" excuse is used to justify their bad behavior that they have become entitled to having since the 1990s. Its a basic construct of feminism. Make women into the "victims" so that they can hurt/attack random men with impunity since they are "victims".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 01:59 PM
1

This is a correct analysis. Women will justify being "rude" by claiming false rape statistics or other BS to justify their bad behavior. Men have no ability to excuse their bad behavior that is held accountable by both men and women. Men are also punished far harsher for the same crimes as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 01:57 PM
0

Yes it was back then but there wasn’t as much opportunity since women married by age 21 on average even in the late 80s. They could have a few hookups but met their boyfriend usually within a year or so of college in those days. It wasn’t until the 1990s that women did this extended hookup thing before marriage that was pushed off until a later year.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 01:39 PM
1

Men would never get these opportunities in general since if they behaved like women, they would reject the vast majority of women for casual sex. Men would be “pump and dumped” by “Stacy” women then? It’s so ridiculous of a discussion, it’s useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:57 PM
1

The discussion is so ridiculous it’s useless. You are putting a hypothetical that can’t exist due to basic gender differences and asking how men would respond in this situation? I don’t know how a higher IQ person is supposed to respond to such a ridiculous premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:54 PM
3

If men were women, then men wouldn't be as interested in casual sex outside of "stacy" women. But men arent women so this post is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:49 PM
1

Truth. ​ If there was a massive shortage, why are they not hiring more and pushing more apprenticeships?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:54 PM
1

mark cuban is chubby and was never an athletic chad or a real athlete lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 08:28 AM
1

oh yeah which ones? They look like nerds to me overall on all fields of billionaires
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 08:26 AM
0

If that philosophy isn’t applied across the board, it is irrelevant. The issue is application has been one way since the 1990s. Now it’s becoming more two way with these actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:40 PM
2

He objectively decided not to help her. Nothing "emotional" about it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:53 PM
9

Women have an expectation of help/abundance due to having unlimited simps since the 1990s who would "protect" them while women shit on the average beta male saying "he deserves nothing" I applaud all men who are not "Chads" to do nothing for the average woman in terms of help. Its the only way for things to improve for gender relations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:52 PM
6

You did nothing wrong bro. She deserves nothing from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:50 PM
5

Women never help men who are assaulted or ruined financially. Stop the BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:48 PM
4

He did the right thing. He shouldn't intervene to protect a stranger female in any fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:46 PM
5

There was plenty of "simping" in the 1990s from betas. Women were already banging "Chads" at bars/clubs in their 20s while not "settling" for betas until their 30s by then. Social media just makes it more obvious now with the "red pill" cluing in some simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:36 PM
5

Simping definitely has an effect. Women get money/prizes/affirmative action from simps. Simps also marry them when they get older as single moms, etc so they have a "fall back option" if they cant lock down a "Chad" Without simping, women wouldn't have these options and would have to settle far younger with more realistic expectations. Simps allow them to remain delusional since they have a backup option for beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:35 PM
4

The value of the "average male" collapsed already by the 1990s when feminism totally gave women affirmative action in both business and academia and women had a steady stream of "chads" at bars/clubs. The online cope didn't make things worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:34 PM
1

Women had no issues banging "Chads" at bars/clubs in the 1990s on each and every weekend. So they didnt need online dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:33 PM
2

How do you explain most billionaires look like Bill Gates then?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:29 PM
2

Yeah thats why most billionaires look like Bill Gates and not "Chad"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:29 PM
6

This isnt incel
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 12:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter