TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vast_Fun_8411 Archive

View 1 post and 71 comments by Vast_Fun_8411 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

GeneralVast_Fun_8411/r/MensRights26/01/26 01:39 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
51

Standard feminist misandry. Men are defective, women are oppressed, #MeToo was the greatest thing to ever happen, boys need to be trained to behave like girls. Zero discussion on toxic feminism, narcissistic entitled girls, false accusations etc. Black gay guy "When feminists say all men are trash they do not mean you" Yes they do mean you. You twat.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 05:04 AM
29

The obvious example is the movie Heated Rivalry which is written by a woman about 2 gay ice hockey players. 80% of the cinema audience is straight women. They have co-opted gay romance for their own fantasies.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 11:36 AM
8

This is spot on. Most rape/SA surveys are carried out by feminist groups who arrange the questions and methodology to maximize their preconceived results. Scientific surveys by non feminists always produce significantly lower numbers. Using common sense about their surroundings and controlling their own behavior, a woman's risk of ever being raped is negligible. Stranger rape is very rare despite what you see in films and TV.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 11:22 AM
5

Feminism will not be defeated until it becomes economically unfeasible to support the female welfare state and politically unfeasible to continue male oppression. By that time this happens you can expect all of society to be in meltdown and the death of feminism will be irrelevant when society has fallen apart around you.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 12:00 PM
3

Here is a good link to see Janice discuss feminist history https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksqgKZfEfNM
/r/MensRights29/01/26 05:42 PM
1

The economic meltdown will likely arrive first before the majority of men demand political change
/r/MensRights28/01/26 07:53 PM
1

The older generations are set in their way, their brainwashing irreversible. We need them to retire/die before a majority of enlightened men can emerge.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 07:48 PM
4

I strongly suggest you watch this video where a life long feminist who has studied history reveals the real truth about feminism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksqgKZfEfNM The feminist movement even in the earliest days in the 18th century was always fronted by angry, man-hating women who espoused female supremacy. It was never about egalitarianism. So forget about reforming it. The ideology exists soley to publicly express misandry and to create gynocentric laws .
/r/MensRights28/01/26 07:38 PM

Most modern relationships dont last. That tells you the answer. BOTH genders are selfish.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 07:58 PM
1

Feminism went extreme in the late 1960s. So we are talking 60 years for society to recognize the dangers and self correct but it has not. Feminists in the 1970s designed a battle strategy in their public meetings. Take over schools, universities, academic research papers, the main street media and finally the government. They suffocated all possible routes of revelation and rejection to ensure their plan for female supremacy succeeded. Only the uncontrollable internet has allowed dissent to orga…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:41 PM
2

Why create a new term though? The name Gamma Bias puts people to sleep. Just call misandry by it name and double standards by its name. Terrible marketing.....
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:20 PM
1

If they cancel the Minister for Women then I might actually believe them.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:12 PM
3

As awful as social media is, its saving grace is to allow boys and men to connect and describe the red pill reality of our gynocentric society. It will take 2 or 3 decades but eventually the majority of men will reject the entire premise of feminism and female privileges.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:03 PM
9

It is a political gamble. Politicians believe most people are in favor of supporting "victimized" women so they back the position that they hope will land them the most votes. But in recent years feminism has increasingly become a toxic label so even most women dont want to be associated with it but the political bias remains in place. Unfortunately I don't think Men's rights will ever be seen favorably by the majority of the population. Eventually it will be the unsustainable economics of suppo…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:59 PM
3

Bohemia has lakes hence it has coastlines
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:47 PM
3

Not books that contained the type of knowledge that he expressed in his plays. There were no books describing court protocol. The early printing presses were used predominately to print bibles and pamphlets. The First Folio which contains 18 of his best known plays only had 750 printed copies and that was not printed until 1623 decades after many of these plays were performed. Try researching facts next time.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:13 PM
1

The marriage vows are the contract. The wife agrees to submit and obey her husband. Until recently everyone understood that was a solemn contract before God which if broken had major implications. Who said slavery and rape was not oppression? Nobody. Just gaslighting now.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:02 PM
1

This is the 1590s not the 21st century. He could not just "read all the books around at the time" - there were no libraries and books were expensive and rare. No commoner would know the first thing about court protocol. There was no knowledge transfer whatsoever about such matters.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:56 PM
5

In the 1590s there was no way to do research. Books were expensive and rare, only nobles owned books. 99% of people would only see one book in their lifetime - the Bible in their local church.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:51 PM
3

There is no evidence he attended school and do you think a village school in the 1570s would have provided anything more than an elementary education
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:48 PM
5

Except Shakespeare plays were the first of their kind. Shakespeare was the driving force to build the first public theater - the Globe in 1599. There was nothing like them before because the educated elite did not write plays for commoners. His plays were medieval pop culture and the elites only wrote elegant sonnets. Before the Globe Theater was built, plays were performed in open markets and were rude, boisterous slapstick hence why no elite would want their name associated with common plays. …
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:34 AM
2

British coverture common law only covered married women where the family was considered one unit and the husband was declared head of the household which made him responsible for all the actions of his wife and children. Why do you ignore the burdens husbands were placed under? Single women, divorcees and widows could all own land. So again where are these worldwide laws, feminists claim that declared women as property of men?
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:35 AM
6

Why are you angry that feminist myths are debunked? If you wish truth you should be happy to get facts.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:25 AM
14

To be fair scholars do believe Shakespeare did not write the works at all for 4 reasons: Born to a poor family, he would have received no/minimal education and the plays use an extensive vocabulary beyond what common folks used. His works show a deep insight into Royal court protocol and politics but he never attended court Some plays accurately portray overseas locations and cultures yet he never left England After he retired he did not write anything - not even a poem. So he was most likely be…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:12 AM
8

They literally will kill civilization. With fewer and fewer babies being born the whole capitalist system and social safety nets become unsustainable and the modern way of life will cease to exist. In 30 years time Western countries will collapse due to a severe lack of working young people paying taxes.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 05:50 PM
5

This is 100% false statement. The ECOA Act prohibited banks from refusing credit facilities to individuals on any basis whatsoever including gender, race and religion. But many American women DID have bank accounts before 1974. It was the bank's decision whether they would be granted one prior to the 1974 Act. Banks could also decide not to grant an account to men too. That is what the law changed. So the correct statement would be some people found it difficult or impossible to open a bank acco…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 05:14 PM
1

Marriage is an actual contract and in marriage the wife consents to having sex with her husband. Hence legally there could not be marital rape until society decided otherwise. Morally of course the wife could be raped but what happens between individuals as not a basis for claiming historical oppression. And the laws around slavery are not part of this discussion for pretty obvious reasons. All slaves regardless of gender were owned by their masters and could be abused in any manner.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 04:46 PM
7

List the laws where women were declared property of men. I have never seen or heard of such. Unmarried women and widows controlled their own money and could own property under their own name. A married family was considered a singe unit. Husbands were declared "head of the household" and could control money and children but as the head he was also held responsible for their acts. So if a wife or child stole something the husband/father would be the one punished. I very much doubt if many marriag…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 04:37 PM
11

Because feminist propaganda has tilted the scales in favor of women and demonized men in the process. The large volume of laws that favor women are based on the false premise that women were systematically oppressed and so worthy of numerous privileges. How can men's rights ever be realized if that false premise is not revealed and countered.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 04:17 PM
35

Yup there were never laws that said women could not have bank accounts. It was up to private banks to decide and since husbands were often the sole bread winner they typically gave accounts to men for the whole family. But women simply had to ask for bank accounts and would be given them if they can show financial means. In reality lots of women had bank accounts. Why would a bank not want to if women were working and depositing money in them? Another feminist myth.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:38 AM
14

Yes the whole women oppressed narrative is feminist propaganda. Historically 99% of people were poor and both genders worked hard just to survive. Most men worked from childhood doing dangerous, filthy, back breaking manual labor and literally worked themselves to an early death. Or they were conscripted during wars and died horribly on the battlefield. As far as something like voting, lets remember that most Western countries only became democracies in the last 200-300 years and typically it wa…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:30 AM
5

Highlighting one small country is a pretty desperate defense. And many Swiss women said they did not care if they had a vote or not.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:13 AM
10

It is the wealth gap not wage gap. It is already reported that most of the wealth created by men ends up with women through divorce and inheritance.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:07 AM
7

While it is a nice article, note how this feminist only lists "safe" disadvantages men face - homelessness, suicide and prison sentences etc that do not undermine feminist ideology . Her feminist training will oblige her to remain blinkered to issues which directly challenge feminism such as false rape/SA claims, paternity tests, non existent wage gap, female quotas, divorce proceedings etc. She has only partially opened the door and let a little light in and that is enough for her.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 04:01 PM
20

You don't need to get married. Just tell any girls you date that you do not believe in the institution. If a man and woman love each other that is all they need and should be free to leave without legal entanglement if the relationship breaks apart. Just be wary of any common law spouse laws where you live. Absolutely don't tell women the house is yours. If your experience with women is limited then you are far more likely to fall for a gold digger because you lack the experience to spot the red…
/r/MensRights31/12/25 10:32 AM
19

Except 99% of rapes happen in a private setting with a male the women knows. Rape by a stranger in a public setting is rare. Violent assaults in public by strangers almost always targets men and the physical and psychological damage from violent assaults equals that of rape. Men use their common sense and rational thinking to understand avoiding certain situations means their chances of being violently assaulted are negligible hence they dont let fear control their lives. Women are perfectly cap…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 06:22 PM
7

Husband kills wife while she sleeps. Poor woman! What an evil man! Hope he gets the death penalty. Wife kills husband while he sleeps. Poor woman! What evil things did that man do to her to force her to kill him. She needs counseling not jail. Spot the difference? All part of the double standard of the social gynocracy. Woman good. Man bad. Women are not held accountable for their actions unlike men.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 04:01 PM
3

Yup 99% of comments about a woman's appearance she will receive over her lifetime will come from other women not men. Women are perfectly aware this is female on female competition among themselves and yet when statements are made that beauty standards are men's fault they stay silent and do not correct. Women are happy to lay unwarranted guilt on men rather than admit this is a failing of the female mindset. As usual, there is no accountability for their own actions.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 03:44 PM
5

The fact that these influencers are so successful is because female supremacy is continuously pushed down our throats in the MSM and masculinity itself is defined as toxic. What do you think would happen? Before the internet, feminists controlled the MSM narrative and kept a lid on the backlash. Those days are gone and feminists are now the ones being increasingly labelled as toxic. They are finally meeting their match and are no longer able to censure the debate to hide the lies that underpin t…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 09:00 PM
11

"Consider being incompetent in a specific area. When we moved house, I made a point of not knowing how the dishwasher worked. I kept that up for about two years. Unfortunately it’s not that complicated and one day I accidentally learned." Wow.. good to know women are just pretending to be ignorant about any form of machine. Great advice for developing a relationship where women pass the buck because machines is a gendered male thing.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 08:22 PM
1

The weird thing about catcalling is that I have never heard any myself ever and I worked for many years in the city walking around the streets. So clearly it is not an issue for 99.9% of women or else you would hear it all the time. I would imagine when does happen it is primarily with women wearing hyper sexualized outfits which of course are designed to attract attention.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:20 PM
41

I dont see any pennies dropping in the article. It is still all about why men's behavior is at fault for the dating crisis. Where is the self examination of female behavior and attitudes? Non existent of course. She describes the effect while making no attempt to explain the cause. And if you trace back to when the dating crisis began there are 2 obvious underlying reasons - dating apps which have resulted in women ghosting 95% of the men who reach out to them and the emergence of red pill/MGTOW…
/r/MensRights05/12/25 07:41 PM
8

Banning folks who you disagree with is never the correct course of action. It just leads to an echo chamber. You have to be prepared to be challenged so you quote facts and present valid reasoning. Then others reading your post get educated. The correct response to someone who appears to be a troll, bot or provocateur is to simply ignore them and respond only to genuine posts even if you disagree with their position.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 07:17 PM
3

The adjusted pay gap in the U.S. is much smaller than the unadjusted gap, ranging from about 0.95 to 0.99 on the dollar for women compared to men when controlling for factors like job title, hours worked, and experience. The unadjusted gap is around 0.80 to 0.83 on the dollar, as it compares all men and women without controlling for these variables
/r/MensRights02/12/25 06:44 PM
1

Agreed the phrases and choice of words in the OP is clearly male. This is the second fake "I am a woman" post in the past week. We dont need these platitudes being presented from a "woman". There are plenty of real women who agree with our stance but they dont talk this way and are more balanced about the subject as you would expect.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 06:30 PM
3

Rule No.1 Must be related to men's rights
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:27 AM
93

Not once did she mention the role of women in the fertility crash. Nothing about women prioritizing careers over family, waiting until their forties to have a single child with a much higher risk of disability. Women receive much more govt support than men so when the money runs out it will be women who will suffer more. I guess they will all turn to OF for income. LOL. The smart ones will marry younger and have kids younger and will take time off to raise them. Everything comes full circle even…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 04:53 PM
1

If you are genuinely interested in this subject then you have to be prepared to go down the rabbit hole. I strongly suggest you watch the documentary The Red Pill by Cassie Jaye. She was also a feminist who wanted to investigate men's rights. He investigations sent her down the rabbit hole. She was so shocked to discover that so much of what she believed in as a feminist was fake that she no longer uses the label feminist because of its connotations with anti-male sexism. You may find it difficu…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 05:18 PM
1

The most frequently listed qualities women said they were looking for in a partner were: kindness (how much time, energy and money will he give) emotional intelligence (will he listen to my moaning and complaining) mental and physical health (will he look after me) shared values (does he enjoy soap operas, expensive restaurants etc) ambition (money and social status) hardworking (money and social status) financial stability (money) masculinity (will he look after me) maturity (will he look after…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 05:46 PM
1

Men are not raised to think of themselves as victims. In fact that is frowned upon as a "loser" attitude. Many men only realize the reality of their predicament when an inequality situation affects them directly like divorce, false accusation, hiring and promotion policies etc. Even then the cultural mindset will resist the label.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 05:31 PM
2

Feminists are becoming increasingly desperate to cling to their lopsided privileges because the decentralized internet has given men the space to answer back without government and media censorship. Equality means equality period. Feminists are losing the argument and when the current young generation becomes society's leaders in a couple of decades, all these inequalities feminists have striven so hard to have written into law will be removed. Society does not change overnight, it takes time to…
/r/MensRights02/10/25 05:14 PM
3

Great summary. The wealth, science, medical and production systems men have built up over the last few hundred years in particular has resulted in softness and irrelevancy where female wishes and desires have overwhelmed society. Immature, narcissistic, irresponsible, selfish people rot society. We all know the current political/economic systems are unsustainable so one day it will all come crashing down then it will be up to men to rebuild again. Women's rights will need to be reset so women bu…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 04:15 PM
0

Men are competitive and when it comes to women most think with their other head. Testosterone drives men to compete for women and resources. Hard wired I am afraid. Not enough men are knowledgeable or care about the issues, they just assume they will be alright and barrel ahead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 03:00 PM
2

Ressentiment is a sense of hostility directed towards men as the cause of women's frustration. Their sense of weakness or inferiority complex and perhaps even jealousy in the face of men generates a rejecting/justifying value system, or morality, which attacks or denies men. This value system is then used as a means of justifying women's own weaknesses by identifying men as objectively inferior, serving as a defense mechanism that prevents women from addressing and overcoming their insecurities …
/r/MensRights21/09/25 01:26 PM
2

That is an interesting description. It seems to sum up feminists precisely
/r/MensRights21/09/25 01:19 PM
12

Roofies are definitely traceable but you should be tested within 24 hours
/r/MensRights10/05/25 06:54 PM
1

There are few facts in rape statistics because most cases are he said/she said and cannot be proved either way. But lets just ignore the only people who can be considered experts in this issue since they spend decades listening to the actual full testimonies of the participants which no one else does.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 06:44 PM
7

The false reporting of SA is much higher. I read a report a long time ago so cannot find it but retired members of police rape divisions were asked in their opinions what percentage were false accusations. These people spent decades of their lives dealing with these crimes so they pick up a 6th sense about who is lying and who is telling the truth. Their answers ranged from 20% to 33% false accusations. The vast majority cannot be proved to be false but this is a major reason why many cases are …
/r/MensRights08/05/25 09:13 PM
1

It is mind boggling that these content creators are being treated as experts. They are just repeating feminist propaganda about Andrew Tate and incels. It is scary that 1984 mindspeak uses a fictional drama to reinforce preconceptions thus creating an infinite loop of self reinforcement.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:52 PM
1

Another memory from 2005 when the BBC had a series where women teached their men good manners using the same techniques as training a dog. It was called Bring your Husband to Heel. Look it up. Thoroughly disgusting and sexist and of course would never have been made if the roles were reversed. BBC had to apologize but no explanation given how this got through multiple committees and reviews and nobody said this is sexist. Same year, highly respected journalist, Michael Buerk, did a single TV sho…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:32 PM
3

Yup listening to private female conversations about how they lie and manipulate their men to give them money or presents. They dont see men as people with feelings but rather something to use for their own benefit. The whole image of women being gentle, loving, sympathetic people blown apart by reality.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:23 PM
134

When I was a student, working for a year in a sandwich course, there was a highly aggressive women who loved assaulting all the men in the office. She would literally slam you against a wall, pin your arms and start rubbing her body over you, licking you and make highly suggestive comments. She did this to all the men regardless of rank to humiliate them in front of others. Her behavior was simply laughed off as a bit of fun and there were zero complaints. Now if a man were to do that he would b…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 12:47 PM
7

It will take decades for feminist ideology to be cast aside for what it is - sexist female supremacy. They will fight tooth an nail to keep it at the center of the MSM and government and their numbers are overwhelming. Every university/college has feminist/gender studies so there are literally tens of thousands of feminist activists being pumped out by the education establishments every year. We are literally facing millions of feminist activists who have committed their entire lives to defendin…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 12:39 PM
1

Same reason why mens rights are rarely discussed in MSM. Feminists have successfully characterized mens rights as hateful towards women. So society believes we are all incels who follow Tate and want to abuse women. While it is great RP has broken through among younger generations, make no mistake the feminist propaganda machine is still mighty and its devotees single-mindedly attack any post anywhere on the internet that pokes holes in their mythology. Under no circumstances must the facade of …
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:57 AM
2

The law will never be changed as the state will now have to cover the costs of assisting the single mother. The state wants men to be deceived so the cost of raising children is paid by private men.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:47 AM
3

Yes KK gave the game away with her response "just when we're getting ahead", KK is forgetting the headline that feminism is about equality and absolutely not, no siree, about female supremacism.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:32 AM
2

Feminists believe that under no circumstances can the spotlight of victimhood be removed from women so when men start talking about issues the feminist defensively reacts like she is being robbed.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:11 AM
2

"KK: But according to my research, and I've spent quite a lot of time writing books about women and girls, in couples where the wife earns more than the husband, they will OFTEN lie about it in the US census data to make it look like the man earns more than the wife." Does anyone believe this is a thing or did KK come across a single instance and makes it a trend. Why would a woman lie about that on a flippin census form? The husband knows what the wife earns or if she has been lying to him then…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:08 AM
1

I do believe SG knows only too well that if he has any chance of getting even mild descriptions of men's issues into the MSM, he has to first preface his discussion with copious amounts of praise for how amazing women are in order to avoid the misogynist label and be shut down.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:01 AM
3

Excellent analysis. It is so alarming to see how much this drama has been elevated because it reinforces the feminist myth that men are inherently violent and must be controlled to keep the lid on. This is why Tate is such a massive danger apparently, he can magically uncork violent sexism in males so must be attacked every day on mainstream media. This is the same old trope that has been rehashed decade after decade - heavy metal music would turn males in demonic cannibals, video nasties would …
/r/MensRights07/04/25 06:56 PM
8

There is a famous short video on youtube called "Its not about the nail". It is supposed to teach men and women about communication but every man who watches it immediately sees the emotional bubble the woman cannot get past which just makes her viewpoint crazy. Reality does not matter, it is just what she feels. Look it up, it is hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/25 04:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter