TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vault_Tec_Boy Archive

View 0 posts and 100 comments by Vault_Tec_Boy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I'd prefer the more nuanced take of a movie like "Boyhood" where both parents clearly have their strengths and weaknesses, but the Dad also clearly loves his kids and stays in contact, even though his take on life is very different than Mom's. Misrepresenting legal reality to make a point doesn't sit well with me.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 06:20 PM
3

After what I consider to be a very successful first date after a few months of flirting on Lavalife, I get told to my face that I'm too short to date, despite being 2" or so above her height. I literally walk out and stiff her with the bill. The topic of male height comes up at work and one girl who is around 5' says that she prefers taller men because she feels "safer", at which point I note that even having one other person, even a little kid, improves your chances of avoiding an encounter, so…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 06:18 PM
6

Racist subreddits work to transform individualized hate into collectivized hate and those groups then use the forums to organize cyber mobs. Yes, Anita, but when feminists arrange cyber mobs on Reddit, like SRS or SRD, it's all perfectly OK. It's not like we haven't seen a dozen men pilloried in public by feminist driven lynch mobs or anything, right?
/r/MensRights19/07/15 01:13 PM
-3

Read his statement again. It leaves out the middle where most of the men sit, for one, implying there's a binary situation (smarter and dumber) and implies that men exceed the extremes of women on both ends (smartER and dumbER). Neither of those are correct insinuations.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:38 AM
0

The bell curve suggests that men tend to be either dumber than women or smarter than women. The bell curve suggests no such thing. It suggests that men's curve is flatter, so we have a greater percentage of our population at the outer ends of the curve than a normal bell curve would see, but that still means the bulk of us are in the middle. Women just cluster more firmly around that mean. We're more spread out.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 12:40 AM
2

Linky That's a graph based on the GSS. There are some idiosyncracies, like the fact single men have nice little plateaus in their mid 30s and early 60s that aren't mirrored in single women, but other than that, there's a long decline from the 20s on out.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 10:54 PM
9

Men take this monogomy / marriage thing more seriously than women . Huh? Quick challenge ... find me books, movies or comics about revenge fantasies for having been cheated on. Count them for men. Count them for women. I think you'll find there's VASTLY more for women, and they are extremely well received. Cheating on a woman is about the biggest sin you can commit ... according to women.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:59 PM
10

It's a misnomer. Their hormones are highest around 30, but "sexual peak" implies that this is where they have the most sex. For both men and women, we have the most sex in our 20s and it's a slow decline from there on out.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:57 PM
3

I think it was a lot more than once. Overwhelmingly, he was polite and reasonable, though, and largely just defending himself. There's a lot of spin on this point, though, and there's people who support her running around in Canadian forums claiming he sent 5000 tweets in a couple of days, and ludicrous stuff like that, to paint him in a certain light.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 07:50 PM
3

True, but most people rationalize the behaviour around some concept of innate freedom. You free each other to be as you see fit by doing this. He's chosen to frame it in a feminist frame, so that he's somehow noble for freeing his wife. The reality is she freed herself. She asked for it, and got it. She was going to do it whether he agreed to or not, the only thing in dispute was whether he left or was along for the ride.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 07:48 PM
4

Everything in this piece argues from a presupposition, which is that expecting fidelity is somehow a patriarchal control on women, which just isn't a supportable conclusion. Women cheat nearly as much as men, but what's telling about the behaviour is that their cheating is treated VERY differently than male cheating. For the most part, cheating is treated to the same hypocritical treatment crime is, so that male cheating is due to something intrinsic to himself, some perceived lack of character,…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 07:40 PM
2

It's less of a right and wrong situation than it is a social collateral situation. She hurts you, and there's a potential that this could rebound and hurt her later if you defend yourself, but there's also significant immediate attention, and there's a bit of mental math going on where she's gauging risk of your reprisal vs. the benefits she gets. She begs not to have it go public, because that drastically ups the odds of you calling her on her shit, and by doing so, ensured she'd get all the be…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 07:22 PM
2

epic twitter hate fight, highlighted by the man mentioning woman's location And the women implying he was a pedophile and pretending to be a 13 year old girl online, plus openly collaborating together to make it seem like he was being more of a harasser than he actually was. How many times did they drop, within a 10-14 day period, tweets that said, "leave us alone" or some iteration of that, when he hadn't even tweeted about them in that period? They were clearly trying to paint a picture of the…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 07:08 PM
7

Yeah, but as long as humanity follows that dreadful bell curve, not everyone is going to have the mental discipline to survive some of these events.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 06:32 PM
1

What I'm confused about is why this app is automatically assumed to be part of "hook up culture". Sure, that might be its primary use, but there's legitimate uses outside this sphere. Look at some of the visible sexual assault cases in schools that have hit. Virtually all of them involved people who knew each other, and with some semblance of an ongoing relationship. These weren't total strangers, but people who hung out, who had classes together, etc. No matter what your end goal of that relati…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:50 PM
3

Awww, you got made, and can't just slink away. How cute.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:08 PM
3

Purposefully inflammatory? Check. Derailing the conversation? Check. Yep, you're a troll.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 09:35 PM
2

As a Canadian (we are socialists) To continue a chain of offense ... I'm also Canadian, and we aren't Socialists unless we water down Socialism so heavily that "working together" gets construed as Socialism. Socialism means a collective ownership of production and collective management of the economy. Only a small percentage of the business operating in Canada is collectively owned, and we have virtually no industries at all where it's collectively managed. We have some heavily regulated industr…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 09:34 PM
7

Wow the number of times you have been molested or assaulted are amazing. Yes, it's amazing that in 46 years on the planet, someone might actually get molested twice in one's life. Imagine those kids who have a fully blown pedophile in their family and get molested multiple times! How lucky they must be! Coincidentally they are all to make a point. Yes, it's amazing how in a sea of headlines and subreddits how a man might make it to /r/mensrights, and how someone who's been a victim of an adult s…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:40 PM
2

"Who defines what a man is? We all have to walk our own paths. What I consider to make me a man may not be what makes you a man." Absolutely true. The only thing we ALL have in common, is that Y chromosome and that we're adults. That's it.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:43 PM
1

Respectfully: male power is no myth. We have hella power. Equally respectfully, most of our power is in numbers, and it's a power that women also have. Sure, historically, when you could take things with sheer might because weapons were hand held, human fired, etc. we men had a distinct advantage and used it, but we're not in that era anymore. Technology has evened the field.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:36 PM
4

Sure, it's anecdotal, and so is my story where my friend's Mom camped out on the couch outside his room and offered to "help me with that" when I got up to go pee at 2a.m. and then proceeded to molest me in the bathroom. And same thing for the French teacher that told my parents I needed extra tutoring, got me to her house, and then groped me from behind while I was playing her piano. The only person I've ever told this to in real life, without being behind the wall of anonymity, is my current w…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:04 PM
4

But occasionally, much like we try to show compassion for all of the mentally unstable men who commit crimes and wind up in prison, its not a bad idea to hold some compassion for a young mentally ill girl who did something stupid and later killed herself. I'm going to respectfully point out that the groups pushing to reform prison in Europe are largely pushing only to do so for women. It's only women that go without uniforms, only women that get community based jails instead of a central locatio…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 02:52 PM
1

She didn't say specifically "women" either, did she? "I’m not spitting in the face or being lazy about what still needs to be done — but I don’t think it’s just women anymore." This sub is called men's rights. Not white male rights, you twat If you're going to slag people, best learn to read.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:28 AM
2

I'm also in /r/motorcycles, so I see a lot of posts about newbies afraid to get on a bike because of the increased risk of injury or death. They hear "30 times more dangerous than a car" and panic. From a purely logical perspective, if they opt not to ride the bike, their decision is logically supportable. That gap DOES exist, so the most logical choice is clearly the car. But, from a risk assessment perspective, not a logical one, it's ridiculous. The fatality rate for cars is 1.8/100 000 while…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:01 PM
1

Long-term, though, the women's game could really benefit from the countries that are at the top. Absolutely, they could, but the question is whether they survive until they get that traction ... IF they get that traction. WCs are only every 4 years, and it's the in between years killing women's soccer. Every league is subsidized and propped up at the moment, so there's no league anywhere in the world where revenues totally cover costs. That really doesn't bode well for that expansion of the fan …
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:45 PM
1

While this is true, the finals had HUGE viewership numbers. Inside the US ... on July 4th ... with the US in the finals. FIFA is international, and it's revenue sources are everywhere, so the US audience is just one piece of the pie. For the men, the biggest audience is outside the US, and numbers in the millions of viewers. For the women, outside the US it dies off atrociously. So, the men's cup probably draws 8-10 times as many viewers, world wide. I think that it probably pulled in a lot more…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:04 PM
1

I'd argue that you're making decisions from a point of fear, so it seems reactionary.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:44 PM
1

It's all related. Women's play is considerably lower quality than men's, and I don't mean just on a physical level. There's poorer tactics, poorer training, poorer coaching, poor overall skill levels, more reliance on "athletes" instead of footballers, etc. A lot of what is getting mocked is that poor play, not the gender. It all starts with that club play. If people support it, the leagues will come, the ad dollars will come, the endorsements will come, the merchandise income will come, and tha…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:27 PM
-3

There's two patients in there, not one.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:18 PM
-9

As father, you are a legal guardian for that child. A legal guardian can't be there for a medical event that could quite possibly cost his charge its life, damage it for life, etc.?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:51 PM
3

Totally disagree. There's only two legal guardians for that child and one of them is under anesthetic, could be unconscious, could even be dead, and instant medical decisions might need to be made on behalf of that child. Put a screen up, let the guy sit there, and get the mother used to this reality well before delivery day. if she's still losing her shit on the day because of it, that's now her issue.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:50 PM
49

"People of colour, gays, lesbians, and transgenders who are carving out this space. I’m not spitting in the face or being lazy about what still needs to be done — but I don’t think it’s just women anymore. We would be so enormously powerful if it were a humanist movement." I guess her vision of humanism doesn't include white males and is mostly just a collection of the ostensibly aggrieved.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:45 PM
1

“The experiences that lead to imprisonment and the impact of imprisonment can be very different for men and women,” Yeah, I'd like to see any kind of study that doesn't ultimately show that poverty, addictions, a family history of abuse, and mental issues don't ultimately drive the majority of both male and female criminality. Once again, the "we're special" card gets played, for the benefit of women.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:30 PM
1

I'm a huge advocate of women's sports, HUGE, but all the gripes come down to one thing ... FIFA is a business, not a charity. Women need to pony up and pay to watch female athletes, because as long as men are the primary sports entertainment pocketbooks, the money will continue to go to male athletes.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:17 PM
2

Sorry, saw it someone's feed this am on Facebook so I thought it was new. I'll downvote it myself.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:34 PM
3

Here's the reality of women's football: Christine Sinclair, one of the world's best female strikers, who is going to go down in history as the second highest scoring woman on the planet, plays for the Portland Thorn FC in the NWSL, a league with 9 teams, which is roughly the 3rd crack at pro women's soccer in North America after several leagues have tanked for lack of interest. Each game, they draw about 7-8K fans, with their record being about 16K or so. In the English men's league system, to g…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:27 PM
5

In other words, sit down (uncomfortably to boot!), shut up, accept the load of "cultural responsibility" people want to shame you with, illogically accept the guilt of prior generations or other men even though you haven't done the sins, know your place, and don't wear socks with sandals. Someone tell this guy that chivalry is dead. "Gentleman"? The proper term is "gentled". No thanks.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:16 PM
20

So, boil it all down and your take is that he should have "manned up" after 20 years of abuse at the hands of his wife and finding out that no government in the entire country wanted to support a shelter to help men in his situation? Wow, you're a pretty hard hearted fucker, ain't you?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:44 PM
12

Without a definition of harm that clearly delineates hurt feelings or offense from actual harm, intent isn't the biggest concern, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:09 PM
2

It wasn't always that way. Back in the 1990s and earlier, child support was considered income and the payor deducted taxes, and the payee paid them. The onus for taxes was shifted to the payor late in the 1990s, I believe.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:17 AM
4

Of course she won't. Now that we know she's lied her tail off about her career and suspect that she's largely overblown his commentary and played "selective quote", we still have to deal with that issue of being female and black. Either one trumps "liar". Both together are an insurmountable obstacle.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 06:48 PM
32

NY arm of NOW opposes shared parenting Misandry opposing SFU Men's Centre Sole men's shelter proprietor kills himself after ridicule If you can't find examples, you really aren't looking very hard. Another one to try is the male pill. Every time a company starts talking about the male pill, out come the feminists.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:57 PM
2

I'm with this guy. For a while now, I've been thinking they mine our anger for cash.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:30 AM
1

Absolutely, but parole violations, three strikes, repeat offender, etc. are typically handled with their own legislation. He would get charged with the morality offence and have a separate charge altogether for the additional time.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:39 PM
12

Let me ask you this: if you had a bowl of M&Ms and some of them in the bowl were poisonous and would make you violently ill and possibly even kill you ... what percentage would it take to get you to opt out of the bowl? At some point, the risk factor gets high enough that you don't need 100% of the women to be risky, just enough to trigger risk aversion. My first wife kept me from my son for 15 years, and now he's totally ruined as a person because she socially isolated him. Do I seriously need …
/r/MensRights26/06/15 08:58 PM
25

Facing rising care costs? Tired? Frustrated? Getting near the end? Invent an affair from years ago, beat the fucker to death, and use the affair as your rationale. What a laughable case.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 08:53 PM
5

I consider MGTOW to have two concrete angles. The first is around marriage, and revolves around how it's inherently unfair for men, so the best option is to opt out totally. The second angle, though, is about dropping all chivalry, and encouraging that same stance in those around you. It can be incredibly freeing when you figure out that you don't have to wait at the back of the elevator while all the women clear out first, or you can drive by that woman with the tire on the side of the road. Tr…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 08:35 PM
29

OK, so let me get this straight ... A guy who finds out he has a debilitating disease and two years to lives goes hardcore, shows the world he's a genius, and ends up with a following. It goes to his head a bit, and he lets his family atrophy, maybe even takes them for granted a bit. Hell, maybe even takes them for granted a lot. He ends up living long enough to watch his wife leave him for another man, he marries again, and ends up with a sociopath that abuses him, despite his disability and hi…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 08:15 PM
5

It isn't uncommon for a convicted criminal facing a harsher punishment. Perhaps not, but that's hardly a justification. Unless this is a three strikes violation, or a parole violation, or he's triggering some repeat offender legislation, there's not much to justify nailing him to the wall on what is ultimately a morality charge. It would normally be treated independently.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 03:42 AM
10

It is mind blowing to me that you can read a self post where he details an ongoing argument with a feminist plus a TV show that habitually slags on MRM and not recognize that feminism is the enemy because feminism has made itself the enemy. When NOW stops lobbying to kill shared parenting initiatives around North America, I'll begin to believe that they aren't a major force in the way of reform, for example.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:42 PM
1

I loved Karen Basilie at the end. Yes, the program worked, but it was clear she didn't like that it worked and didn't like the implication that its success held.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:00 PM
3

Absolutely not. The core issue is body autonomy, and the difference between parents violating that bodily autonomy for x cultural reason vs. y cultural reason, or whether one violation is worse than the other physically, is totally moot. You defend a child's bodily autonomy and you fix BOTH issues.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:33 PM
3

I didn't get that from the tone of the article. It ends with a cry to treat them as the offenders they are, and blatantly says that they get away with it and will continue to offend. To me, the article simply explained their different mindset, and possibly why society treats them differently, and didn't necessarily defend that bias.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:22 PM
4

I think you and I are basically agreeing, just nattering on nits.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:37 PM
3

There's gender bias that benefits women at pretty much every stage of the CJS, so you can't really put it down to one stage of the process vs. the other.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:27 PM
-1

How is this relevant? The fact there's some judges out there we can applaud for truly being neutral arbiters of justice doesn't somehow excuse those that clearly are not.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:16 PM
3

Men's groups are actually banned by the Canadian Association of Student Unions. The national organizations are the CFS (Canadian Federation of Students) or CASA (Canadian Alliance of Student Associations) and neither "ban" anything, because they don't write bylaws for the various students associations that fall under their banners. They can write language that indicates they oppose certain things, and the CFS has written into their policy documents that they are opposed to any group that purport…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:45 PM
43

In the last building I lived in, a young family parked their car right in front of my window, so I saw them all the time because their lights were shining right in my face, incessantly. I kept running into the daughter on the back stoop because her parents would always lag behind her when going to the car, so to make sure it wouldn't cause me issues, I consciously stayed back one time and introduced myself, so they knew who I was. After that, I figured things were fine, so when I'd bump into the…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:38 PM
7

And so the rhetoric begins to run up against the hard wall of reality. You cannot sell girls on the notion that they can do everything a man can do, as well as a man can do it, because there's hard differences between the sexes that result in measurable differences in ability in select areas. Sometimes those differences favour men. Sometimes those differences favour women. Accepting those differences is not prejudice or inequality, it's plain and simple acceptance of reality. For example, while …
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:42 PM
1

I'm glad he got some time with his son, but that's a very sad story. We have Alzheimers in my family, too, so you have my sympathy.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:25 PM
1

This is a really good idea. I wish I had heard it all those years ago, but my son is 15 right now, so it's probably not too late to start. Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:24 PM
62

15 years of watching my gifts go in the garbage, of monitored phone calls, of read and discarded mail and email, of being accused of being an abuser, a stalker and a kidnapper. Happy Father's Day to you, too, /u/njskypilot.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:42 PM
3

A friend of mine just experienced this. Paraphrased, his reply was, "No, it's just called parenting."
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:10 PM
20

And ... nothing happened. People walked, people handed out buttons and pamphlets, and that's it.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:05 PM
18

MRAs inevitably find themselves at a point of friction with feminists. You can't lobby to remove systemic bias against men without ultimately running into feminist organizations. Who opposes shared parenting legislation around North America? NOW. How can you have a conversation about shared parenting without ultimately facing the fact that the nation's largest feminist organization is firmly teeing off against your stance? It's impossible. And in a similar vein, you can't ignore that it's virule…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 01:23 PM
5

Most of the top rated comments seem to generally support CAFE.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:49 AM
12

The overwhelming majority of the complaints are smearing by association, and try to link CAFE to US groups like A Voice for Men, who are perceived to be heavily anti-women/anti-gay. There's slight commonality, simply because they are both Men's rights groups, but CAFE is a registered charity in Canada and has all sorts of regulations to abide by to even qualify that private organizations like AVfM don't have to touch. They really are different birds.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 10:24 AM
29

So, to make people "safe", they have to ban a perfectly law abiding group that had already attended the Pride parade without issue prior. I don't think they are using "safe" in the same way most people use it. "Safe", in their usage, means "no one who holds challenging opinions anywhere near, even if they have no real avenue to express them".
/r/MensRights20/06/15 05:06 AM
2

Like it or not, framing affects perception, and you can't tell half your population to fear sex with adults and tell the other half to treat it like the holy grail without seeing some pretty severe differences in perception in the victims. For boys, that means confusion as they try to reconcile society's pollyanna view with the actual experiences. When I was 15 and my buddy's Mom offered to "help me" go to the bathroom at 2 in the morning, I was pretty much instantly ready for action, but my hea…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:03 AM
13

We have a responsibility to show women the same respect we want to receive from them. Respect goes both directions, and it's clear that if a stray comment that's arguably been taken out of context can cost him his entire career, despite decades of work and several female colleagues and past subordinates weighing in on his support of women in science, then he's really not getting any. Certainly not enough that he's given the benefit of the doubt. As long as a junior equity officer without any rea…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 01:29 PM
24

Bad enough to cost him his career? Not a chance.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 01:02 PM
26

From what I understand, he was ironically referencing his own relationship, because he and his wife met and fell in love in one of his labs. I think he expected those assembled to realize he was poking fun at something he was guilty of himself, so it was self-deprecating humour.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 12:55 PM
1

I have to admit, this post of yours simply didn't make sense to me. Chivalry started overwhelmingly as a code of honour IN COMBAT, and had nothing whatsoever to do with women at its outset. It wasn't until knighthood became more firmly founded as a social class that you see it spreading past how you conducted yourself on the battlefield and became a larger guide to behaviour in society as a whole. When it did, it pretty much immediately put women at the apex of the social pyramid, so this notion…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:02 AM
9

Only the best art reaches that point, when it become iconic, but this is by no means at that level. It's a stunt, and not even that original of a stunt to begin with. 20 years from now, no one will remember this.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 06:13 PM
7

Once you establish that these women think rape is everywhere, you can see where their stances are coming from. Sure, she's an unreliable witness and she's not the best spokesperson for the movement, but the problem is just so freaking huge that her video will have some value, regardless. Sure, some people will get falsely accused, and that will ruin their lives, but the problem is just so freaking huge that this is something we should accept because the greater good will be served by allowing vi…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 04:15 PM
8

To me MGTOW is a natural repercussion to slowly increasing risk. If you build a system that sees the general risk to those involved in the system slowly rise over time, you'll also see an increase in the percentage of the people exposed to that risk that start to take actions intended to minimize or mitigate their exposure. Eventually, as that risk keeps on rising, you'll get to the point where you start to see people opting out altogether, and this is where we are with modern marriage and the m…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 04:01 PM
37

The part that got me furious was when the one hostess said that she was examining this piece in a vacuum. Why? It's directly thematically linked to her previous piece, the actions portrayed in the piece are clearly referential of what she says happened with Nungesser, the piece is coming hard on the heels of her forcibly extending her mattress piece to the graduation stage even though Columbia tried to head her off at the pass, etc. It's clearly part of a thematic grouping of events, not a piece…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 03:07 PM
5

Not sure I agree. Clearly, social pressure works well enough that organizations are willing to jump all over to satisfy Facebook and Twitter campaign demands. If we both consider this an illegitimate use of social pressure and damaging, how do you get it to stop? Asking nicely hasn't worked. Shaming hasn't worked. Even some mild repercussions where several recent campaigns have flipped on their head and some pressure went back the other way didn't work. I think the only thing that will work is i…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:36 PM
2

Maybe she should enable comments if she wants to claim that men aren't speaking out, and simply prove it.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:23 PM
5

and he was fired a few hours later for literally quoting feminists. He wasn't literally quoting them. He wrote the article about how his fraternity wrote specific policy to help them handle drunk women at their events in the day and age where lawsuits and possibly banning from campus were a possibility. You could argue that this roughly aligned with feminists ideas of what men should ideally do if they come across a really drunk woman, ie. help her get home, but it was clearly centered around ke…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:00 PM
3

??? Whether there's been an active draft recently or not, it's still a fantastic topic to bring up. There's nothing more visceral than showing that men are expected to pay the prices women don't, even the ultimate one. We can all extrapolate from the law to what would happen in wartime should the draft be enacted.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:55 PM
2

The irony is that most of the men in the MRM would be fantastic allies, should they want to shift their focus to actually enabling freedom where it's needed most. I think most of us would really like to see places like Saudi or Iran open up.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:17 PM
8

I want to meet this solicitor. One client wants more money based on conjecture around a future flotation that could possibly raise the value of the company, and the other client wants a greater portion of illegally obtained funds. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:22 PM
1

I'm with you. I only witnessed my father smack my Mom once, and it was after a good hour of her maligning him to her friends in the kitchen, repeatedly, until he finally snapped and gave her an open handed smack on the back of the head on the way out the door. There's the odd nutter that's just violent by nature, but the overwhelming majority of men don't get violent without some sort of driver.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:17 PM
2

It can be a really tough room in here, but I get the impression that you're the type of personality that doesn't mind tough rooms, which is something I definitely admire. My family was filled with strong, powerful, talented and intelligent women. Their toes would curl with modern feminism, so I'm glad there's the odd rarity that shows there's still some quality in that murky old water. I'll definitely check out your stuff.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:26 AM
7

We’re willing to pay men who carry guns to assert our will, but can’t be bothered to come forward, one human to another, and interact? And we expect men to take us seriously as equals? As fellow humans deserving of equal rights and respect? While I have some minor issues with the rest of the piece, this, to me, is gold. The online variety of modern feminism, at least it's overt face, is flagrantly weak. It doesn't engage and change minds, it rolls up an Internet mob and uses the force of numbers…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:44 PM
4

I usually do, but that's because I'm a pretty tiny guy, and it's less of a concern for me to shift into one seat, force my legs closed, and ride out until my stop in some minor discomfort. There's some really big dudes, tall or broad or fat or even all three, and getting them to squelch into one seat is nigh impossible. The woman who advocated for sitting on people, for example, put a picture of a guy ostensibly man spreading with that article, and it was a really long-legged dude who had to be …
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:33 PM
1

Switch genders ... male comic brags at an award dinner about how he can get pussy any time he wants, even though he's not all that attractive. Cue the torch and pitchfork brigade.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:18 PM
1

I honestly don't know why this is in men's rights. Most of her suggestions seem reasonable, even though they are a bit naive and I would normally think that part of advice around living together is how to deal with potential fallout if it all falls down. Where's the money discussion? Where's the property discussion? Where's the advice on determining your province/state's take on common law marriage? Where's the advice on that danger zone three months in when people let go the illusions and masks…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:16 PM
2

That's happened in Quebec, from what I understand, but you risk that in any province that's BITC, which is all of them. If you've established care and find out after the fact you're not the father, you're hooped, because the choice is between ending financial support for the kids and doing the right thing by you. You know how that ruling is going. Just contest early, often and incessantly. As long as you don't establish care, you're fine.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:04 AM
9

I feel for you, bud. Ontario, for being the center of Canada and home to our arguably most cosmopolitan city, was ridiculous. I remember one "discussion" in a court room where the judge suggested that because she grabbed my son and walked out the door ... and I let her ... that I was tacitly admitting I wasn't the primary caregiver. I guess I was expected to physically fight over my 13 month old son in the street to better establish my claim? I handed him the breakdown of care hours in the home …
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:26 PM
6

The state of Men’s / Father’s rights in the Canadian Legal system is, for lack of a better term, horrifying. That depends upon the province because most of this legislation is provincial in nature. When I lived in Ontario, it was horrifying. Just walking out the door established her as the custodial parent and myself as the access parent, and dropped my legal decision making power literally overnight. Despite the fact access parents are deemed "interested parties" and have legal access to docume…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:04 PM
1

Apologies or explanations? There's been many academic studies and non-academic articles written about the motivations behind infidelity and they aren't really apologetics for the behaviour. That's not really the sense I got from this article, either.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 04:58 PM
0

How so? The cheater's new wife is referred to pejoratively and her kids are referred to as a "brood", the expert opinion pretty much says stay at home Dads are ticking time bombs for infidelity, and the affected women are clearly painted to be sympathetic characters. We're clearly expected to feel sorry for the fact that the cheaters prospered and the hard working mothers were shafted.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:36 PM
1

Some people can be taught the truth, some people can be led to the truth, but some people just need to experience the harsh end of the truth before they see the light. Unfortunate, but true.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:31 PM
2

I agree, but I think the best course is to argue for equality in terms because that, at the very least, will show up the double standard. When we acknowledge that a 24 year old woman sleeping with a 15 year old boy is equal to a 24 year old man sleeping with a 15 year old girl, then we can start to question why it's considered immoral, but getting to that equal playing field is more important, IMO.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:08 PM
6

But, see, that's not what /u/WebSlinger66 was saying. I know. That's why I said, "It's not the balls that are the issue ..." I was pointing out that even though his statement was BS, there was still a legitimate reason why most men sit the way they do. "do you really need to sprawl out to three times your body's width to be relaxed?" Of course not, but the reality is that we're talking about rudeness, not criminal behaviour. It's not the cop's job to enforce social standards, it's the members of…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 10:09 PM
2

So I guess my biggest inquiry is how do you think we can move inequality forward? a) Fix Family Law. The single biggest driver for the MRA movement revolves firmly around custody, visitation and alimony. Until those get handled in a fair and equitable fashion, there will always be MRAs, whether they call themselves that or not. b) Get women to actually act like equals, ie. assume an equal share of ALL social responsibilities and expectations, not just the fulfilling ones. And my second inquiry i…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 09:56 PM
11

It's not the balls that are the issue, it's the muscles on the inner thigh. Our hip angle isn't right to keep our legs together, so we need to actually exert force to do so, and after only a few minutes, those muscles we're using get pretty sore. My local hockey arena renovated to put in more seats, and it cut down the space for each seat enough that you have to sit with your legs together the entire game. I'm a cripple by the time I leave.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 08:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter