TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vegetable_Ad6969 Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by Vegetable_Ad6969 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

That's sad and all, but let's spare a thought for the primary victims of war, women. /S
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:04 AM
35

God forbid if it was a father beating his daughter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 07:34 AM
13

Can't justify the former, but discussing how it affects women is a tactic to get the general public onboard, because as we all already know, people aren't concerned about men's issues for the betterment of men alone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 11:24 PM
24

Her story would've been the sole case the article would focus on.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:08 AM
6

Feminism as a movement doesn't give a shit about women's individual agency. Just look at how they treat women who don't conform to their beliefs. "Pick me's", "attention whores", all phrases used to marginalise women who don't subscribe to feminism.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 11:00 PM
24

While I find the purposeful denigration and violence of men by women on screen quite irritating, it is generally a more recent phenomenon that stems from society's current fashion on 'punching up' on men. What I find far more aggravating is the normalisation of torture, mutilation and violence towards male characters on screen, particularly no name bystanders or henchmen. In any movies that features heroes and villians, the henchmen will always be portrayed as well; men, regardless of whether th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 01:04 PM
10

That was my thought too. If I'm receiving a lessor service compared to someone else, than I should be paying less. They at least could do an upgraded premium service that costs more but prioritizes those clients so that these fearful women can 'feel safe'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 03:24 AM
36

Perpetrators already get longer sentences committing crimes against women over men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 12:35 AM
44

I find these acts actually terrifying. They are proof about how easy it is to mislead the public by manipulating statistics. Its absolutely shocking that our governments aren't in the pursuit of truth to allocate resources to the taxpaying citizens that need it most. It makes me think what else am I being misled about through manipulated statistics that I am not informed about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 12:47 AM
57

Spoiler: it's the latter
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 11:58 PM
2

Which is all the more reason why cases of men being abused by women need to be discussed, to remove the stigma. While the article may have good intentions, it only reinforces the false stigma that sexual abuse is a crime only committed by men onto others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 09:06 PM
33

Interesting that 3/3 cases discussed also have male perpetrators despite the fact that 80% of male victims had a female perpetrator.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 08:39 AM
6

It's highly variable on individuality, however most large scale studies that test pain Tolerance amongst genders do show a slight leaning to men having a higher pain Tolerance. I am dubious of the results however, as I personally suspect the difference could be made by traditional gender rolls compelling some men to underreport their pain. It is verified though that women's pain Tolerance rapidly increases leading up to childbirth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 12:33 AM
21

Can't forget whinging about emotional baggage either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 10:00 PM
13

It's a sad state of affairs when the only way we can convince people to better men's lives is to justify how it will help women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/21 09:41 PM
34

Agreed. In isolation, I see no problem with this as women do make up the vast majority of readers. It's the hypocrisy that drives me nuts. Male dominated spheres are constantly berated and socially engineered so women can get a leg up to 'equalise', but these domains are left untouched or worse, used as examples of womens benevolence or superiority to men.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 01:17 PM
6

Ontop of that, the gap is further shrunk because female abusers know and exploit the fact that they will be believed by default, and know they can get away with it. While potential male abusers have to show much more restraint because of the severe repercussions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 11:03 PM
2

But I think its important we separate the differences in nomenclature. I and a lot of other people on this sub do concern themselves with womens rights, but I think it is safe to say, that the vast majority also abhor feminism.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 08:17 AM
3

I think it's important we make the distinction between women's rights and feminism. It sounds like the people you are talking about fall under the umbrella of women's rights activists, but feminism is pretty clear on its objectives, goals and definitions. If you don't confide with the concencus of Feminism then well you're not a feminist. Feminism is a subset of women's rights in the same way that MGTOW is a subset of men's rights. The difference being, is that feminism has become so large, in p…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 03:46 PM
1

It's really discrimination towards women because society thinks they are too weak to fight /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/21 04:09 PM
5

Nobody, and I mean nobody projects harder than a feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/21 06:33 AM
7

A quick google search shows tons of articles about it. https://newbeginningsadoptions.org/why-do-adoptive-parents-prefer-girls/ https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2004/01/why-do-adoptive-parents-prefer-girls.html https://www.orissapost.com/now-girls-are-the-preferred-choice-for-adoption/ https://www.futurity.org/strong-preference-for-girls-in-u-s-adoptions/
/r/MensRights09/10/21 04:19 AM
7

Including the west. Where 80% of adopted children are girls.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 11:44 PM
37

They have utter contempt for anyone who challenges their narrative. Men, women, anyone who challenges their worldview is fair game for slander. It's pretty blatant and awful how they treat men and consider them disposable. However, just as you said yourself, I find it just beyond hypocritical even to their own standards about how they treat women who don't support them as well. While they are supposedly fighting for 'womens rights' and 'freedom of expression for women', they are very quick to la…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:28 AM
78

It's the latest moral panic. In 20 years (hopefully) we will all look back in disgust how men were framed and treated in today's society.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 11:49 PM
11

Up until the 21st century, men outperforming women was seem as definitive proof that women are being discriminated in education, and that drastic efforts need to be made to correct this. Now that the tide has turned (well 20 years ago), we hail this as a great achievement and that women are just smarter. Even though they outperform men, women continue to reap special privileges in education through gender exclusive scholarships, women in stem, women in aviation etc. Complete double standard and …
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:25 PM
16

Bloody well written. Not only that, but studies like these spit in the face of men who willingly sacrificed their lives to save women and children. Furthermore, it implies that men who don't sacrifice themselves to save women, are not deserving of empathy during a tragedy. Aka, they are promoting toxic gender roles that harm men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/21 02:18 PM
1

In my country men can only wave child support if the woman agrees to it.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 05:25 AM
7

Yes that's exactly my point.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 08:27 PM
45

I agree with your point, but the current system is also completely against men. Men should have the opt out and not pay child support if an abortion is still possible.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 01:40 PM
4

Most feminists are pro choice...until it comes to the choice of the father. Than it's shut up and pay my child support.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 02:16 PM
6

In my country they vaccinated all teenaged girls for HPV, but excluded boys. I recently inquired with my GP if I could get the vaccine, but I was informed that I was ineligible for a rebate and it would cost the full $300.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 06:54 AM
5

Boys and men are always degendered to people/students/children etc, but women and girls's gender is always exemplified. If an article doesn't specify the genders of the deaths of the victims, it's a safe bet that the victims were either all men, or the vast majority were men.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 05:25 AM
2

That's a feature not a fault. Because then more man hating 'men need to be better' messages can be forced upon us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 05:14 AM
2

Anyone who has to say they are the king is no true king.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 10:50 AM
2

They're all about breaking gender norms until shit hits the fan.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:24 AM
15

This is the right answer. There are a lot of good answers in this thread, but the root cause for all of them is the empathy gap. I genuinely thought society was starting to open its eyes to male disposability but after seeing the utter vitriol towards men from pretty much every source with the Afghan situation, it's pretty much quelled all my hope.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 02:33 PM
5

Pick one: 'Men aren't the real victims because they're the ones out there fighting, while the women want no part in this war' 'men aren't the real victims because they've let this country crumble and should be out there fighting, not running like cowards'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 09:48 AM
9

So 75,000 in a country of 18 million are representative of half the population? If all men are accountable for the actions of a few, does that also extend to other demographics too? Are you accountable when a mother from the other side of the country abuses their child. How about black people? Are all black people accountable when one black person commits armed robbery? I didn't think so, you just hold different standards because you're a misandrist.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:14 AM
13

They're busy arranging for governments to only accept women and children refugees.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 01:16 PM
24

They have no choice but to put those statements in or otherwise the study has a good chance of not being published. It's a crime how much political pandering is required even for academia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/21 12:45 AM
54

Most often I see people use the Americacentric opinion that it is because men choose to commit suicide with firearms which have a high success rate. Except the ratio of men to women suicides is pretty consistent across the board, even in countries where there is strict gun control.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/21 08:40 AM
1

But still the outrage doesn't befit the crime. Where are the celebrities speaking about this, the trending hashtags? What people think when they here about this is damn that's awful and then fuck Qatar, but then they move on. Everyone's still gonna watch the world cup. If the 7000 deaths were women and not poor brown men, I think there would be far more outrage.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:23 AM
1

More than double 911. Where's the outrage?
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:24 AM
1

Are you referring to the Queensland system, and QCS test? Because I had an almost identical experience to you. English was our only core subject. I consistently received much lower grades in English than my other subjects, but when it came to the QCS exam, my literally marks were on par with other subjects such as maths. I also received the highest marks out of the boys in my English class, but most of the girls received higher marks than I did.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:07 AM
4

No it's the disposability of men. Men in power were able to place themselves in positions that put themselves outside of harm's way, but if put to the test, society would have still deemed them disposable. No case is more clear cut than the sinking of the titanic. Poor women in third class were still prioritized over men in first class, and infact men were so disposable, they let lifeboats go half empty over filling the seats with men.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 06:58 AM
14

I think it's all the more reason to try and change. Every liberation movement has faced resistance and setbacks. It's what makes modern day feminism a complete joke, they say they are 'fighting' for equality, but they aren't met with any resistance from the status quo, they are the status quo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 10:45 PM
23

I've always held the view that all is okay or none of it is okay. For example, as I'm sure most people on this sub are aware, there have been large campaigns to increase the number of women in male dominated industry's, as well as scholarships exclusive for women studying for these industries as well. While not my preferred approach of equality of opportunity, I don't think that is inherently bad, however, we see no equivalent opportunities for men wanting to enter female dominated industries. T…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/21 11:38 PM
45

I am constantly receiving ads on Facebook from charities and the like asking to help women/girls in poor countries, education, cancer, and the workplace. The other day was the first time I'd ever seen an ad campaign targeting men's needs which was a prostate cancer campaign. I think there is some progress but the scales are still heavily weighed in women's favour more needs to be done to draw attention to men's issues.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 02:31 PM
6

Yes I hate many of the stances of feminism and I regularly comment on it too. But you didn't mention feminism, you mentioned all women, and painting broad strokes that all women are vile makes you no better than the feminists who state that all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 12:37 PM
2

Only now does do the feminist subs speak up they oppose the draft. Where were all the posts decrying the draft before this bill? Oh nevermind they were too busy discussing about how men need to cross the street for women to feel safe.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 12:32 PM
4

Fuck out of here with your sexism. This sub is for men's rights not speak hate on women. You (and I) would all be outraged if someone on FDS spoke about men like this.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 12:27 PM
0

This sounds like a good thing but it really isn't. Noone man or woman should be ever have to be drafted and risk facing the horrors of war. While I'm all for gender parity in rights and responsibilities, I think it's a bad look to celebrate in spite. It makes our position on men's rights look weak. I think our efforts should more be prioritized to removing selective service altogether, where men rightly gain their basic human rights rather than celebrating women losing theirs.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 01:01 PM
5

You've already tried, and if your friendship is as close as you say it is, why would she listen to some random strangers on the internet when she doesn't even listen to her closest friend? You trusted her and shared probably the most vulnerable story you have, and not only did she deny your feelings, but outright attacked you for feeling emotions. This is unacceptable. I had a female friend once who excused my female rapists when I opened up to her, and I cut her out of my life and never spoke t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/21 12:43 AM
1

Okay I'm not defending their argument at all but I do want to add my experience to explain how it can happen. When I was 8 years old I was raped by two teenaged girls in my own home while my family was out. The experience absolutely traumatized me and it completely screwed up my ability to be intimate with women right until my early 20's. The most bizzare part about it though, is I had absolutely no recollection of the event until I was one day lying in bed and suddenly the memory came back and …
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:11 PM
9

No that's equality of outcome, same BS femists push. Equality means removing court biases, providing equal mental healthcare, and providing equal funding and facilities for the homeless, DV, and sexual assault victims.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 12:11 AM
1

Switzerland recently had a constitutional poll to determine if the draft for men should continue. The results found that around 50% of men support the draft, while 70% of women supported the draft.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 12:22 AM
3

These studies are not conducted to determine what factors lead to DV, nor are they actually about determining a link between gender and DV. Their flawed methodology is by design, to create arguments that support preconceived notions and policies. Creating a simple victim/perpetrator narrative that is easy to digest has been an effective tool used by governments to increase popularity. In this case, by creating a narrative that women are victims/men are perpetrators, it creates a clear path for g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/21 03:56 AM
5

No, you made a statement that feminism helps men which was proven false. Then you have beaten around the bush trying to justify the logic and discredit the source without a lick of evidence. You're the one not acting in good faith.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 08:49 PM
5

You're being ridiculous now and going around in circles. You're analogy that it's like screening women for prostate cancer to me indicates that you believe it's either impossible or so rare that men can be abused to raped when that's just not true. Yes women get sexually assaulted more than men, but men make up a VERY large minority, and government and charity support doesn't reflect that. Men are also far more likely to underreport DV and sexual assault, there are many studies which support thi…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 08:21 PM
14

No. The new policy was going to provide funding for organizations that provide equal opportunity for both genders. DV figures will never be accurate because most people don't report their assault to authorities, however, anonymous studies do indicate that the gender ratio of DV could be anywhere between 35-70% of victims being men. Even if that wasn't the case and men only made up 1% of victims (which they don't), the law should still accommodate them. Here is an alternate analogy that is parall…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 02:03 PM
18

It's about as obvious as the earth is round, but if you really need a citation, here is the latest petition created by Women's Aid to reverse the new gender neutral DV policy the UK is drafting up in favour of a gendered approach to DV. The petition advocates for exclusive services towards female victims of DV, and that providing support for male victims is unnecessary. https://www.womensaid.org.uk/international-womens-day-womens-aid-launches-petition-to-require-local-authorities-to-fund-womens-…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 01:43 PM
554

It doesn't matter if it's 1% or 90% (it hovers around 35%). If both genders can be a victim of a crime, then both genders deserves attention to resolve those issues. By your logic, we shouldn't be providing care for women at risk of suicide because it's more common in men and thus male suicide is worse. Again, by your logic, male homelessness is more common and this more serious, so we should be prioritizing shelters only for men. I'm going to assume you disagree with the latter two statements, …
/r/MensRights13/05/21 11:29 PM
3

It's people like you that give men's rights a bad name. Change your attitude or leave.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 12:25 AM
4

The Guardian has always had an agenda on emphasizing women's issues and downplaying men's issues. In the current genocide of Mozambique, they covered an event where all the boys were rounded up and enslaved/killed. They not once mentioned that all the victims were men. Only using non gendered words such as children or people. Not even a month later, they covered a similar event, however this time it was all girls who were targeted. And like clockwork they explicitly elaborated how they were all …
/r/MensRights04/05/21 04:03 PM
11

The same period where the government dragged young men to be tortured and die overseas only for the survivors to return home and get spat on by the privileged back home while simultaneously being labled as warmongers and child killers? For as long as wars have and will exist, innocent men will be oppressed.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 01:45 PM
3

They really can't let men and boys have a single thing can they these days.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:45 AM
2

"when he commits". Very concerning when laws aren't written to be objectively neutral around gender.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:57 AM
4

Than conscript women too.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:10 AM
13

https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:07 AM
3

Lumping all women into a category because of the actions of a few is the same kind of BS we speak out against happening to us. We are better than that.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:45 PM
34

Many academic studies suggest that women have a strong in-group bias, while men don't. Women in male dominated fields make the assumption that they are being discriminated against because they know that if the roles were reversed, women in power would support other women. So now there has been this large disinformation campaign about boys clubs in the workplace and how women are being out down and not promoted. We see this discussed in political debates, advertising, tv shows and movies. Apart f…
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:40 PM
7

It's not at all dangerous to female victims. It's only dangerous to feminist narratives
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 12:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter