TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VerySpecialSnowflake Archive

View 12 posts and 659 comments by VerySpecialSnowflake on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

eberkimer is full of shit. They are in no way shape or form a "feminist site," and unlike most of the sites you list, they actually fund a large number of nonprofits dedicated to helping men & boys. I mean, seriously. You list the Spearhead as some sort of do-good activism? Please.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:48 PM
0

Do you know who put up the display? I assume it was a student group of some sort? I really do not think such a large display would fly at my school, as it is quite conservative.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:27 PM
0

No. I guess if I defined myself as anything I would say egalitarian, but I don't really define myself. Too groupthink-y.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:11 PM
-1

LOL, yeah buddy.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:59 PM
1

I really don't see what difference any of this makes, as the topic is going dutch and some users being all fucking offended that 1) some couples take turns rather than going dutch, 2) some people would prefer not to be a pain in the ass to their server and just split the check because they are fucking grownups and not Larry David.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:39 PM
1

You said you hadn't insulted me yet when you most certainly had. And now you want to change the goalposts and say, "well you started it!" Another win for intellectual honesty in /MensRights!
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:19 PM
1

It seems like every now and again a trans person or gay man will pop in, find the conversations here disgusting, and leave again.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:58 PM
-1

No idea what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:29 PM
0

Splitting bills with 8 people or so in a party isn't a huge deal (esp. if there are a few couples, meaning only 4-6 checks). I'm talking about when the party is even bigger, like 20+, and people have ordered and split wine, beers/pitchers, appetizers, etc. It does depend on the POS of the restaurant, too. Some of them (like chains) make this easier, but many of the places I frequent do all the math by hand. I de facto tip 20%, more if service is great, less if it is terrible. I think everyone sh…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:18 PM
2

How big is your "large group" of coworkers? Eight and under, fine. Twenty, not so much. No one wants to deal with 30 extra minutes splitting shit up just to save one rude cheapskate $2.00
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:07 PM
2

I haven't personally insulted you here yet No, you're just an idiot. Idiot.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:52 PM
2

So people in a monogamous heterosexual relationship should only ever split the bill, otherwise, misandry?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:19 PM
0

I haven't personally insulted you here yet No, you're just an idiot. Not only are you an asshole and a crybaby, you are also either extremely dense or a liar.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:07 PM
1

Hey dipshit? See that link to the NY Secretary of State entry for its 501c3 status? That is your evidence.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:45 PM
0

Well I am still poor, but I have friends out of school, into their careers that insist on doing this shit. It is so frustrating (nickling and diming). One person in particular - I arranged a friend's bachelorette and specifically said we would be splitting the check evenly, not individually, and to bring cash. This person insisted on dividing the check down to the last penny AND using a card. I felt so bad for the server - we were a party of ~20. I was pissed. It was unbelievably rude, IMO.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 03:08 PM
2

Personally, you should go fuck yourself. Tell me again how my original response to this post was trolling? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11586v/the_perfect_relationship/c6jfd1n
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:55 PM
-1

Actually, as someone who has waited tables before, yes, it is a bit of the pain in the fucking ass to split bills. Especially when the couple you are giving a bill to TAKES FUCKING TURNS PAYING SO IT ALL EVENS OUT IN THE WASH.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:38 PM
1

Truth hurts your butt???
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:28 PM
2

LOL, MRAs pretending to care about trans people, but only when they think that doing so is sticking it to feminists. Stay classy, Anthony!
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:11 PM
1

I am a young woman living in the U.S.A. and I can assure you with 110% certainty, it is not strictly a Canadian or German phenomenon. The feminists I know (which are many in school) always pay for their own meals, drinks after class, etc. so IDK why you say it is a Germanic attitude or "predates feminism." It is a bit impractical for my manfriend and I to go dutch as servers see us as a couple and assume the checks are together, so we simply take turns paying.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:54 PM
1

A non-profit organization that MRAs hate b/c they mistakenly think it has ties to NOW or MS magazine. They actually give a lot of money to male-centric charities, far more than any MRA group ever has or would hope to, but evidently toeing the feminist-hate line is far more important than, you know, doing something. edit: http://www.charitiesnys.com/RegistrySearch/show_details.jsp?id={BEDF6EC8-20BF-4634-A6D3-8F3D5DC41E36}
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:44 PM
1

So sorry.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:59 PM
0

Fuck you, buster. The sad thing is, you and your bretheren don't just downvote things you view as trolling or even things you view as a differing opinion (which you do that too.) You also take to downvoting totally fucking normal shit, sensible shit, on-the-same-side-as-you shit simply because someone (usually a woman who doesn't hate herself) one time in the history of the internet had an opinion that hurt your feelings. Seriously, fuck off. I'm not going to tiptoe around a bunch of whiny-ass m…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:47 PM
-4

No, I'm not a troll. And if you look closely at my statement, I said MR users will downvote pretty much anything from a non-self-loathing woman. See also: FeMRA. Sorry I don't adequately hate myself and other people of my gender.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:02 PM
-6

TIL r/MR dipshits will downvote pretty much anything from a woman if she doesn't hate herself an adequate amount.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:05 PM
3

First off, I think there really is no such thing as a perfect relationship. There will always be ups and downs, rough spots, etc. My parents are married over 30+ years and while I know they are the loves of one anothers' lives, it'd be wrong to say their relationship has been perfect or idyllic. And perhaps the ability to weather the ups and downs together and grow stronger are what make relationships strong. Frankly I think changing gender roles has helped me and the men I have dated. For examp…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:09 PM
-2

I don't think it's right to draw a connection between this and rape culture. but then However, it was assault. Uh. Ok.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:16 PM
2

And wtf with them sharing a bed? So weird.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:22 PM
1

I don't really understand what your first two paragraphs have to do with anything I said. I would be okay with her name being released if she were 18, but she's not. Even if she's charged as an adult (which I think is morally reprehensible), her name should not be released if she's a minor.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:50 PM
5

A 14-y-old boy cannot get pregnant and denied an abortion without parental consent. How are news sources disclosing the photo and name of the accused as a minor?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 04:22 AM
1

why isn't it the putative father's place to speak with the pregnant mother naming him as father to discuss the future of the baby and go through all the options? Don't put words in my mouth. I said it's not his place to convince her of a certain outcome. And it isn't. Why isn't it the place of the best friend of the father to counsel him or them both? Probably because she only has one person's interests in mind and is like...20.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:56 PM
-4

It's not "the friend's" business. And it is neither one of their place to convince pregnant woman to relinquish the child or abort the fetus.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:30 PM
1

Not really: http://viewonbuddhism.org/anger.html
/r/MensRights06/10/12 01:38 PM
-3

I'm hoping we can convince her to at least give it up for adoption if termination is not possible or moral for her I don't think it's your (or his) place for "we" to convince her of anything. It's especially not your business.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 01:26 PM
-14

No one gives a shit if/why you were banned from another subreddit, esp. if you were obviously trolling.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 01:14 PM
-3

You don't sound like any buddhist I've ever known.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:19 AM
0

I come over that they want to castrate and kill us. Oh good grief. Give me a fucking break.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:44 PM
0

I'm not promoting it. I oppose infant circumcision. I'm just wondering why, if words don't matter, why people insist on calling it MGM.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:45 AM
-6

But it's circumcision...so why not just call it circumcision?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:01 AM
1

Where I live, the U.S.A., a human being between the ages of birth and 18.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:42 AM
-4

If that's true, then why does /mensrights insist on referring to infant circumcision as "male genital mutilation"?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:22 AM
1

It's ridiculous & ineffectual whey FB users do it for "breast cancer awareness." No difference if males do it for prostate-awareness.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:57 AM
2

I only use boy/girl when I am referring to a child. I have never seen people in /mensrights refer to grown men as boys.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:43 AM
-1

Hm. It's almost as if murder is a professional hazard of women who do housework or other cleaning. Of course, I am sure if a shitton of male butlers were routinely murdered on the job, you'd totally overlook that.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:08 PM
1

http://digitaljournal.com/article/311858 http://www.deccanherald.com/content/267067/maid-found-murdered-near-bush.html http://www.caribarena.com/antigua/news/police/98352-jamaican-housekeeper-dies-suddenly.html http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/06/fullerton-man-arrested-in-alleged-rape-of-housekeeper-he-found-on-craigs-list.html http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/05/25/news/national/brutally-tortured-housemaid-found-dumped-near-gujranwala/ http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-de…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:55 PM
5

When did you last see a male housekeeper?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:31 PM
2

I feel really strongly that I want to stay intact, and damn the cancer risk Women have to have their breasts, ovaries, and uteruses (uterii) every day to to either actual diagnosed cancer or significant cancer risk. If your doctor thinks that it would be safer to remove, I think you should take heed. Your health is far more important than your ability to procreate. And of course, you always have the option of saying you need more time to think it over before making the decision. Why is surgery t…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:33 PM
2

Men's items are typically priced less expensively than comparable women's items.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:10 PM
-2

Wasn't this topic just posted here like 5 days ago? Shit.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:13 PM
1

What, exactly, is problematic about this? What do you mean by "extended periods of time?"
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:58 PM
1

A household doesn't need to be in poverty to have money problems. I grew up in a middle-class/working-class household, and we still got free school lunch,, wore hand-me-downs, parents fought about spending, etc. You hit a certain age you and start to worry about savings & retirement, not to mention your kids' educations.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:37 PM
-9

How to lose weight, syncing your periods, stuff like that.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:09 PM
1

LOL, enjoy it as much as you can. I truly regret not doing so when I had the chance.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:49 PM
1

So you live in near poverty, but can travel for half a year around Europe and don't have a job. How do you live, dude? I'm fascinated! Are you a rich kid who went off the grid? A person with a health career and savings that walked away from it all? A free-spirited hippy ruffian prioritizng experiences over possessions???
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:53 PM
1

I do not have the time or inclination to respond point by point, but I did read your whole post and appreciate the thought and time you took to lay out your points. One thing that did occur to me while reading was that you are very right about there always being two stories, and the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. The wife is not a money-grubbing harpy (and I do take exception with you thinking she sees her husband's worth as coming from money or income); the husband, though his story …
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:38 PM
1

Of course that's not what I'm suggesting. I am suggesting, however, that it takes more than $600/month to pay for one's own expenses, joint household expenses, and two children.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:21 PM
1

I thought you guys were discussing if he could care for himself for 600$?? That, but that figure also came from the fact that he contributes $600/month to the whole household upkeep, so that includes his children. I'm just saying it's quite doable, just not easy peasy and you have to be willing to make sacrifices Quite doable? Really? So if you live in a city and have for all your life, you uproot your life and move out to country how, exactly? It's 2012. I really do not think it's reasonable to…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:04 PM
1

You have high-speed internet for $25/mo? Does the $127 on your mortgage include interest, taxes and insurance? Being that the man being discussed in the article has two children, do you think it is feasible that you could add two kids (or even one, considering his wife would care for half) to your living situation and spend only $600/mo.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:38 PM
-1

Rush Limbaugh.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:12 PM
1

So basically, one has to go though some pretty extraordinary measures to live on $600/month and have a significant amount of up-front money for purchasing land, a trailer, and two beaters? How do you have internets?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:13 PM
0

She does say "cooking, cleaning occasionally and being there for our two children, who are now 7 and 16" in reference to his duties. Well, I suppose it is nice that he does the minimum required in helping maintain a household and feed himself and his kids. Not laudable, but I don't think the guy's a scumbag or anything. I'm not prepared to take her assessment at face value. Many stay at home parents stay at home well beyond those ages and I'm not sure either of those children have stopped making…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:22 PM
1

As I understand it, the child wasn't confirmed his until recently. Why would she have arranged such things with him if she wasn't sure he was the fathere? And as far as your second paragraph, the fact that he refuses to financially support his child in any way until he makes contact with him sort of undermines him taking any sort of responsibility. And contact with your child is not a given right. Ask any parent who has had their child taken away by CPS.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:59 PM
1

Why didn't you pick up on all this? I guess because I'm a perpetual crybaby angerball with a victim complex.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:37 PM
-4

The cat came with the BF, in fact.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:01 PM
1

Break it down, if you don't mind. I am diligent about saving $$$ but would welcome ways to improve.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:50 PM
1

Wow. That's pretty despicable, especially when you think of the surrogacy industry baby mills in India. How dare you claim that those women have no self-respect?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:40 PM
-2

Really? Are they homeless? Do they get food stamps or any other assistance? Are they in college, sharing a shithole with 4 other people? Because I'd really love to see how any American can live on $4.68/hour wages.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:29 PM
0

He's not doing it to get back at her, he's doing it as a consequence of her shitty behaviour. "He's not doing it to get back at her, he's doing it to get back at her. See the difference?!?!" If her charm misses out because of it, it's HER fault because she's responsible for the mess. Huh? Charm? That's what it means to have responsibility: she should have chosen a better course of action to avoid this/make sure her child has the best care possible. Hm. So why doesn't he also have to make sure hi…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:10 PM
1

She said they "shouldn't be trashed". I took that to mean "don't criticize them". Criticizing Barack Obama would mean something like, "I really don't like his views on foreign policy, or that he backs drone attacks and has been lackluster on some civil rights issues." Trashing Barack Obama would mean something like, "That porch monkey is a Muslin Kenyan terrorist that eats fetuses and is gonna to take our guns." See the difference? I see people are breaking Reddiquette again and downvoting your …
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:57 PM
-10

Yeah, sure, whatever.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:41 PM
-4

That's about 20% more than what the man in the article is contributing to his family's expenses per month. I just calculated my monthly bare essentials (not counting my student loan payment, vision, or dental) and it is just over $1,000/month. I split a modest apartment b/ my boyfriend and split everything except for transportation. (My car payment is less than $100/month. And I wouldn't even had that, had my car not gotten totaled shortly after I dropped full coverage after owning it outright f…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:22 PM
-3

Apartment: $300-600/month for something small Gas/electric: $75/month modest estimate Phone: $25-$46/month for landline, burner, or inexpensive mobile rate plan Transportation: $55-$300 month for public transit or modest car with low monthly payment, gas, and insurance Single person health plan through employer group package: $50/month Groceries: $300-$400/month This is not even accounting for some non-essential but somewhat-essential for someone living in 2012 such as an internet connection ($5…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:05 PM
1

Yes. And they are bad people.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:15 PM
-3

So again, how does this change the "dude mad at lady, punish baby to get back it her" scenario? we say that this someone, who's in a financial crisis of their own making, and who could have easily avoided it, has to be bailed out by the very person who was robbed of his agency when she made her decision. Actually, I don't think parenting or children are a "financial crisis," and the last I understood, women do not magically become implanted with an embryo all by their very selves. The guy says h…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:02 PM
-10

I am fine with people being stay-at-home parents, male or female, and not necessarily contributing financially if they can afford that arrangement. The author of the article makes it clear that their kids are now old enough to not need a SAHD, and she is stuck working a job she hates as well as trying to start a business, devoting another 20 or so hours per week in inpaid labor to that endeavor. It sounded very much like the arrangement was working for them for quite a while, but it has been som…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:48 PM
1

People use surrogacy cause they want a biological child to keep their family name going and knowing their family will move on. That makes no sense. You can adopt a child and it will have your "family name" and "move on." It largely exists for white couples that want white newborns.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:36 PM
-5

LOL, MensRights is quite good at alienating some of its allies or would-be allies. The sanctioned "FeMRA" with the usual bullies pitted against "LadyMRSs" which AFAIK was started organically by a woman who once posted here in good faith is just one example.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:08 PM
-18

I don't see what that changes, really. He's contributing, yes, but he's sure as shit not "paying for himself" as Curebores says, or contributing "equally."
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:56 PM
-8

So his money still does not go toward HIS HOUSING, HIS UTILITIES, HIS HEALTHCARE or HIS CHILDREN, you think he's paying for himself? How? He's finally contributing ~$600/month towards "family expenses." Could you find a house or apartment, pay utilities, pay for a phone or transportation, healthcare and food for $600??? Hell naw.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:38 PM
-14

Fuck off, shitstain.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:24 PM
-1

Everyone will have to start eating pussy. No electricity b/c no coal will be mined. Fortune 500 companies will be handed over to lesser-qualified female VPs and be run into the ground. Everyone will have flat tires and crashed cars, because females can't drive and there will be no white knights to change tires. Everyone will get fat. No one will be able to tie a proper knot.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:12 PM
1

Quite honestly, when I come down to it, I think that people who use surrogates are selfish. For years I tried to squash down that opinion and say, "It's not for me, but people should choose their own choices!" I think it is totally selfish to so desire a "biological child" that you will forgo adopting any number of children in the foster system needing permanent homes. Not to mention, so many surrogacy practices are unethical due to no nationwide (U.S.) our international standards on the practic…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:57 PM
-11

What difference does her profile make? I met my BF on there after joining ~2 years ago, so my pictures are at least that old, some even ~3 years old. I maintain an account despite making it clear that I'm in a relationship and have no interest in dating anyone who talks to me on there, or having sex with them. I don't really get your ad hominem attack on her.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:38 PM
-8

I wouldn't give her a penny until he gets to meet his kid. So the kid, which is definitely his, doesn't deserve support until the father is able to physically meet him? Even though that could be months away? What a great, loving dad!
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:08 PM
-22

The husband mostly pays for himself and he looks after the kids. If he doesn't contribute to his housing, utilities costs, groceries, or health care, no, he doesn't "mostly pay for himself" whatsoever.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:48 PM
0

AND?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:17 PM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:58 PM
3

And see? Your worldview is man vs woman. There is no "vs." Regarding sexes, what is there besides "male" and "female"? Men are men but not all men are masculine. Higher quality females choose more masculine men, by experience. Strong, unbiased, non passive men. He-men. Manly men. So "high quality" is associated with "masculine." Interesting. You're an idiot. Not liberal weenies lacking muscle mass. So those are not men? Michale Moore isn't a man? Neither is Keith Olberman? Anderson Cooper, def. …
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:21 AM
0

So your link says that FGM doesn't relate to lower HIV risk whatsoever...you are proving what, exactly??/
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:09 AM
2

If x then y. Maths. What is it? How so? That presumes all men are aggressive, dominating, etc.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:53 AM
0

So weak, lowly, peaceable, submissive, and impotence are feminine traits? And there is a movement out there that hates strength, nobility, aggression, domination, and virility? Are the hatred of men and the hatred of masculinity the same thing?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:48 PM
-12

That doesn't really warrant an AMA, does it? I mean, she's not going to fucking come on Reddit and answer your questions. My guess that the policy will be reversed expeditiously and she will make a clarifying statement stating that she was wrong, but that her intention was not blah blah blah blah.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:00 PM
-1

There is a movement of hating masculinity? Define masculinity.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:38 PM
-1

What movement? I can't possibly hate men - some of my best friends are male.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:15 PM
4

Let's reiterate our position on handling hating feminists. FTFY
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:16 PM
5

Why didn't you post the link? It's from 2001. Not saying it's not sweet or whatever, but if you want to pull something once a week about the goodness of men, surely you can find something from the last week....Upvoted anyways.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:38 PM
0

How are they methodologically flawed? Plus the threat of banning anyone who dares to compare MGM circumcision to FGM. So what? Her blog. She can ban whoever she wants.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:23 PM
1

Research should be above review and the scientific method? Where does she say this? I'm willing to bet $100 cool that she didn't. She said that there is a brief except in a much larger study that people like you (I presume) find problematic, which is fine, but that it shouldn't be used to dismiss the whole thing outright or justify not studying the subject further. I wonder if she'd be singing the same tune with regards to Africa if someone had done research showing FGM reduces STD transmission …
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:13 PM
-1

What is hypocritical about saying, "I oppose circumcision, but maybe, just maybe, it's worth not dismissing it outright in places where there is an AIDS epidemic, and we should see if more scientific evidence supports it?"
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:02 PM
-10

Did any of you dipshits actually read that blog post? I’m critical of circumcising male babies because of the bodily autonomy issues it might be that the moral and ethical implications of removing a piece of a baby’s sexual organs trump the health benefits, even in places where we are literally talking about the difference between life and death I am generally in favor of “do not permanently fuck with your kid’s body without his or her consent" even if for you the calculus doesn’t change, that d…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:28 AM
4

Isn't anarchocapitalism basically just a less buttoned up form of libertarianism?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:47 PM
4

They aren't married. No, she wouldn't get alimony. Most attempts at palimony fail, and common-law marriage is not recognized in most U.S. states.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:50 PM
4

In my h.s. some of the restrooms (women's) didn't have stall doors and some had curtains. I suppose if you are worried about graffiti, curtains are an okay compromise, though I shudder to think what people could do with/to the fabric. Maybe they could reinstall the doors and paint them with a material that wouldn't take graffiti?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:36 PM
3

This was in texas, correct? No surprise. I heard a news report on school spankings recently, and basically the only "consitent" thing about it was how inconsistent it was, and how there are very few, if any rules governing how and when it's used and detailing how it is executed. I can't even believe spanking kids is legal, especially by teachers and administrators. It disgusts me to even see a parent smack his or her kid on the ass. All you are doing is teaching kids about the violence of author…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:22 PM
2

I agree. I used to read it weekly, but not sure what it has to do with MR.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:10 PM
2

I didn't say it'd be an issue of the copyright law. I did say the subject did not consent to have nude images of him circulated to friends, family, and employers without consent. If it affects his employment, he easily has a case, presuming he is in the U.S. Will try to find similar cases in Westlaw when I get a chance. Edit to add: Retain all proof of blackmail, screenshots, text messages, etc. Where has she already posted/uploaded them?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:22 PM
1

1) Who cares about 2x? 2) Why would they care if anyone sees this? How are they trying to hide it? 3) What does this have to do with Men's Rights? 4) Can you back up your claim that "2xc declares her to be a man"? 5) Donwvoted for irrelevant, sensationalist title.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:40 PM
12

I know from what I've read on reddit that photos taken consentsually with knowledge of all participants are free to be shared basically. Is this true? No, this isn't true. Your consent wasn't given for the photos to be shared. Are you in the USA?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:28 PM
0

Most libertarians are racist. Libertarianism supports racism.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:02 PM
1

she felt her parents put too much pressure on her to succeed academically they see porn as their only way out.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 02:44 AM
1

IIRC, Mayonesa is a particularly disgusting wingnut who has shat all over this sub with his extremist posts. Pretty hilarous/pathetic.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:03 PM
-25

Yeah, sure.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:53 PM
-25

Against shaming creeps, except when creeps are women? OK.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:19 PM
-5

So witness testimony is no longer evidence?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:02 PM
0

http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/who-wrote-ron-pauls-newsletter From a libertarian magazine. http://theaporetic.com/?p=1575
/r/MensRights21/09/12 11:39 AM
1

Suuuure. I think we can assume that 95 percent of the black men in that city [Washington] are semi-criminal or entirely criminal." Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began. If you have ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be. Now whether we will ever know if Reddit Golden Boy said this or if it was actually Lew Rockwell is yet to be seen. Regardless, libert…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:34 PM
1

Yeah, buddy, ok. http://www.capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1734/rand-paul-no-barry-goldwater-civil-rights http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/01/how-ron-pauls-libertarianism-supports-racism.html http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/10/van-jones-libertarianism-would-spit-in-the-face-of-dr-king/ I got tons more if u want 'em.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:37 PM
1

Is your honest claim that it is a human right to not be discriminated based on your race? Sex? Gender? Um. Yes.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:26 PM
2

Over 95% of police injuries and fatalities are men, and women represent 20% of the police in the UK. Did it ever occur to you that THAT is why it says female police constables instead of simply constables? That the default is "man" or "white man" (i.e., what people picture when police constable is mentioned) and anything out-of-the-ordinary (i.e. being a woman) is noted?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:43 PM
1

Fox News has an abstinence column. It's not far off.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:32 PM
1

Read any historical libertarian thought on the civil rights movement. It's all there. The LP values private property above human rights. The government should have no role in protecting intrinsic human rights if thsoe human rights infringe upon property rights. ∴ using dogs, batons and hoses to protect the rights of private property owners (say...restaurants) to reject the human rights of blacks.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:22 PM
1

Wait? Isn't this the same fucking website that claims that women are uncheck pedos for thinking Justin Beiber is hot? (shudders)
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:11 PM
0

You think that the government - federal, state, and local - should be compelled to protect the interests of bigots, even if this means violently attacking nonviolent protesters. I don't see how you really "got me."
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:49 PM
-17

This is very convincing and I am sure it happened IRL.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:13 PM
-2

Spoken like someone who truly knows very little about art history & male artists.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:00 PM
-2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ohk-Ey01c9k
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:48 PM
1

Considering your wage? If you hadn't bailed on her all those years, you really wouldn't have to worry about it now, would you?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:35 PM
1

I get de facto DVs b/c some users think I'm a troll for sometimes disputing them.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:24 PM
-1

I oppose gender discrimination in schools and support a strong social safety net. What does that have to do with "womynz"? Are men not the majority of our veterans? Our homeless? Fuck you, moran.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:37 AM
0

Yeah, and? That shit is gross. (Though I think members of NSYNC and BSB were of legal age.)
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:27 AM
0

OMFG> GONNA PEE. For those who don't know: http://www.hulu.com/watch/1321
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:10 AM
-2

So by this transcript, if accurate, the therefore vastly inferior refers to the three years younger and not the "and a boy." That clause indicates happenstance. (Just from an English major perspective.)
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:59 AM
2

This has what to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:49 AM
1

Who gives a flying fuck about "long-standing tradition"? Is anyone stopping the PTA or any other organization from hosting, coordinating, and funding a father-daughter (or mother-son) dance? NOPE. There are better uses of taxpayer money than this type of shit.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:39 AM
0

Really? Hm. Well, I'm a woman, but I can say with 100% certainty that I have never seen a teenage boy and thought to myself, "Yeaaah, I'd like to hit that slightly post-pubescent ass."
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:21 AM
-5

Public schools have no business fostering the notion that girls prefer to go to formal dances while boys prefer baseball games. This type of gender stereotyping only perpetuates outdated notions of 'girl' and 'boy' activities and is contrary to federal law. [Parent-teacher organizations] remain free to hold family dances and other events, but the time has long since passed for public school resources to encourage stereotyping from the days of Ozzie and Harriet. Not every girl today is interested…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:33 PM
-2

So you don't actually oppose discrimination in any meaningful way...
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:34 PM
-1

I actively dodged child support for many years, and I wrote nasty emails to the out of state child support enforcement people as well as the judge. So we are supposed to feel sorry for you? For how many years did you dodge? By my calculations of $200/month, you dodged for at least 8 years.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:09 PM
-2

I thought the MRAs were the ones issuing threats, based on the original organizer's statements?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:55 PM
1

She's not exactly a "feminist rock star," dude. Woman + "muscian" (which she is not one) =! feminist. In fact IIRC in the past feminists were up in arms because of some ill-devised "character" she created that was disabled from a botched abortion or something. Anyway, I think her music sucks, and she sucks as a person for trying to get free labor for the "privilege" of playing with her. Other business types try to do this to artists all the time, but it's not usually another "musician".
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:43 PM
0

Founder Tadashi Takaoka is a man, FWIW.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:23 PM
-2

I've never met a libertarian that opposed discrimination.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:10 PM
3

Love it! My dad died a few years ago, and one of the fondest memories I have is of him painting my nails for my senior prom. He did them more like coloring with crayons, so they didn't look very good, and I was going to wear gloves anyway, but I loved that he did it for me. I was reminded of this a few weekends ago when I saw my brother painting his daughter's (age 4) nails for her.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 04:54 PM
-4

Am I the only one who does not think "Lexi" is actually flirting with this guy? And that he is a bit of a...IDK...not a creep or pedo, but sort of pathetic reading so much into her behavior? It is very disturbing he calls her "hot jailbait daughter." It is wrong and weird that he is extremely turned on by that. It may be adventageous for him to have a talk with the mother about the daughter leaving blinds open when she is doing things that are private like dressing, changing, or fucking.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 04:34 PM
2

It might be helpful if you could share how you plan on incorporating MR into the humanities discussion? Are you exploring a certain era, genre, etc? Would the more general "masculinity" work better?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 04:17 PM
7

How dare a woman think she can go out and have fun just like everyone else in her peer group, wear whatever she wants to wear, and not get violently assaulted!?!?! The nerve!!!
/r/MensRights18/09/12 04:00 PM
0

Uncomfortable indeed.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:40 PM
-1

In Canada, maybe. In the USA, you would be laughed out of the courtroom if you actually found a lawyer to take this.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:14 PM
1

:) I thought so.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 09:09 PM
-1

This thing is posted here at least twice a week. Reported.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:24 PM
0

What I am saying is she had an extra edge on me and the other guys just because she is a woman. The only way you could possibly come to that conclusion, though, is if you think that you or the other guys should have been the default choice simply b/c of your gender. If the lot of you were qualified equally, how would have choosing you been any less sexist? I have no way to know that was the determining factor in her being hired- but it probably helped at least a little. That's right. You don't k…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:38 PM
-13

I knew there was a reason I hated libertarians.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:26 PM
-2

We both applied to this- and we have very similar GPAs and everything. So why shouldn't she have gotten the internship?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:00 PM
2

It is probably "wrong" to engage in sex acts with your cousin, but most young children (usually earlier than 7 or 8) engage in doctor or other explorational activities that are more of a curiosity thing than a sexuality thing. Did you and your cousin actually engage in sex? Did you force her or talk her into doing things she didn't want to do when playing doctor? Were you significantly older than her? If these can be answered "no," then you certainly didn't rape her. If she does follow through w…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 06:50 PM
-2

In Canada, maybe. In the USA, you would be laughed out of the courtroom if you actually found a lawyer to take this.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 06:35 PM
3

How about, "What about the men?!?!"
/r/MensRights17/09/12 05:15 PM
1

If you figure out who posted them you can probably sue them for libel as AVFM was not declared a "hate group". You can sue anyone for anything. You just won't get anywhere.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:55 PM
2

I'm guessing anyone who posts to /r/niggers is a troll, a terrible person, or both. In this thread and in another you've "joked" about taking action to kill your girlfriend/wife and making it look like an accident. Fuck off, we don't want your type of shit here.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:31 PM
0

Never been hit. Never complained.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 01:04 AM
-6

Not a feminist, but thanks so much for dismissing me because of my gender nonetheless, dipshit.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:54 PM
-7

No one called him shit. No one would have had he not helped. I've stepped into potentially dangerous situations oodles of times because it's been the right thing to do and I'm a vaginal-american. Would that guy have not stepped in had it been two men in a confrontation, one of whom was hostile and potentially dangerous? I would have. You are reading too goddamn much into this shit.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:21 PM
-10

Turns out he was fired by her. She's probably now a target for retaliation/workplace shooting spree in the future. the woman, as well as bystanders, looked at with the "Why aren't you helping?" So they looked at you with what you allege is a certain look on their faces expecting you to step in, but no one ever actually asked for your help or urged you to help? It pisses me off so much that I am expected to stand up for women when, as the president said, they can do anything we can do and usually…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:39 PM
-3

He didn't "lightly tug her arm", and that was a pretty big fall. I often find myself speeding when I have to take a piss. I've already predetermined that I'll just get out of my car and piss my pants if I ever get pulled over.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:46 PM
1

You make no sense. Counselor (or in this case, psych) has every right to tell patient they are wrong/sexist/stupid when they come into an office and say shit like "dumbass rape victim walked alone in a forest at 3 AM DUH what do you expect." It sounds very much like OP is a liar and/or GF is a liar to garner sympathy/jealousy from OP. GF probably does need to break up with OP b/c one or both of them are lying sacks of shit. First rule of therapy if you don't like the fucking therapist you don't …
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:35 PM
1

So without corroborating evidence of a crime committed/conviction, I could still easily be listed there? Ok. Sure showed me.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:21 PM
-9

What your GF said is horribly offensive. And your girlfriend is a terrible person for saying it. What the fuck that all has to do w/ her seeing a therapist that hits on her, IDK.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:20 AM
2

You can post it there right now. No crime needed! PM me and I will send you my name and address. I don't think it's allowed to be posted to Reddit directly.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 10:32 PM
-13

I'm an atheist and I often feel like talking to MRAs about gender issues is like talking to Christian fundamentalists...especially since they tend to agree on their hatred of feminism. So I feel ya.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:27 PM
1

I don't speak whatever language that is, but I think it would be better to post as an IMGUR screenshot so you are not linking to actual people's real names and preal G+ profiles.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:14 PM
1

Have a discussion, but not in the moments after you are shot down after initiating sex. Sexual compatibility is very important to relationships, and maybe there are things you and your partner need to communicate about that you haven't been. Don't guilt him/her or issue pathetic ultimatums. Just try to genuinely to get to the root of things and figure out what you can both do to get the spark again. Good luck!
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:55 PM
1

Hm. This is different than register-her how exactly?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:43 PM
1

Yeah. Kind of my point.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:15 PM
2

She is probably depressed that a bunch of jerkoffs stole her verb all the nouns panel. Love her comics/stories, and bummed that this is the last we've heard of her. I love this one so much b/c she did it right as I was going through a major depresison/breakdown in my first semester of law school and felt there was no way out.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:00 PM
2

Different from register-her how exactly?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 03:02 PM
0

You know, it kind of floors my how so many users here insist that teaching women how not to get raped, how to defend themselves and 'be responsible' etc., is not victim-blaming, but then something like this comes along and the same people get all bent out of shape b/c it paints men as attackers and women as innocent victims. WHICH IS IT???
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:50 PM
-1

Terrible.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:31 PM
1

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (September 2012) While they did not dispute men's institutional power, they stressed the costs of traditional masculinity. Taking a cue from early feminists who criticized the traditional female gender role, members of the men's liberation movement used the language of the subsequently much criticized sex role theory to argue that the mal…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:21 PM
0

If you look into the history of feminism you'll see that the "men's movement" was birthed by feminism. Yes. As a reaction in opposition to feminism, i.e., anti-feminist. Christ. Is it really that shocking or that big of a fucking deal?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:54 AM
0

I, however, actually consider myself feminist with a focus on men's rights. Your post history says otherwise, but I'll give you a cookie anyway. FWIW, the comment chain thus far has been: Is the MRM too focused on being anti-feminist. Yes. They are inextrecably linked. Not true. How so? Most MRA goals coincide with feminist goals. (WTF this has nothing to do with showing that MRM and anti-feminism are not linked?) End goals don't matter. Process does. Ad hominem insult. Lets examine the similari…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:47 PM
-3

So how are men supposed to protect themselves from rape? As for your other examples (seatbelts, condoms, helmets), the reason people don't go apeshit about suggesting these safety measures is because driving (or riding in a car), sex, and bike-riding/skateboarding are all activities in which people consensually engage and no crime is being acted upon them.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:31 PM
-2

Christians and Muslims have more or less the same end goals, therefore Christians cannot be anti-Muslim? Ok then. http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-04-29/news/31480677_1_florida-pastor-pastor-jones-koran
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:20 PM
1

This makes no sense. Why is it called "Dear non-cis people" (meaning, I assume, "Dear trans people") but does nothing but address feminists?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:18 PM
-1

Though I don't think this exchange ever actually took place AT ALL, she this fictitious teacher shouldn't have listened in on or joined your conversation in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:00 PM
1

If men could get pregnant, it wouldn't change the fact that a baby is a baby and shouldn't be murdered. LOL, whut?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 03:50 PM
-2

The end goals really have nothing to do with the fact that MRM is anti-feminist by nature and by definition.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 03:28 PM
2

Really? How do you figure?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:58 AM
-7

I think the MRM is one and the same as anti-feminism, FWIW.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 12:29 AM
0

Actually, if there were no moms, there would also be no dads, and subsequently there would be no children, so it's moot. Whatsmore, the human race would die out in about a century. I'm actually just fine with that. AMERICA!
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:40 PM
-1

LOL, he's the new Ron Paul of Reddit, eh? There is also Jill Stein if you lean to the left. There is always the option of voting for neither. That's what I plan on doing, ENTP.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:46 PM
1

Yes. Post photographic proof, b/c I have a strong feeling this story is made up simply so the MR constituency can say, "see, women are such ungrateful bitches!"
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:35 PM
-12

Much more often, an SRS sock puppet attempts to troll the MRM and make us look bad. Yeah, sure.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:23 PM
1

This happens when I say basically the exact opposite of what I really mean.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:21 PM
1

No, I didn't
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:06 PM
1

And?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 09:52 PM
-2

Is this marketing person in high school? No? Does she have a college degree and maybe even a master's and some years in her field? Then the proper term is "woman." If you want to disrespect her profession, whatever, but you wouldn't accept being called an engineering boy, I presume.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:32 PM
2

IMO no one hates men more than right-leaning politicos.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:12 PM
2

While the image itself is misandrist IMO (implying that an absentee biological father is a scumbag) the top comment as of now is, "And she'll marry bad luck Brian saying it is his." I feel like that comment really does point out how ubiquitous hypergamy is, and brings the MRM to a wider, receptive audience.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:09 PM
-7

Saving this for the next time one of you motherfuckers posts a link from 2X or front page saying a woman who's been raped is lying.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:58 PM
-6

Be skeptical but be a friend. Just because he said he was raped doesn't mean he actually was, but that is not for you to determine. Your job is simply to be a friend to him and encourage him to use the resources he can to get any emotional help he needs after this alleged assault.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:34 PM
-4

You have the option? So bisexuality is your fallback plan? Everything I said still applies.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:52 PM
-5

Dude, I am pretty sure you can't just change your sexual orientation like that. Do you really think gay men don't have struggles dating other men? Do you not think that some men can also be shallow and gold-digging? You're only 19. Live a little.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:09 PM
-1

Yes. It's true in much the same way that "all men are rapists" is true. (That is to say, it's not.)
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:40 PM
-1

Yes. I'm a troll because I think shit like this: You may think to yourself "how about getting your female friends to not be gold-digging bitches" but I'm actually really picky about the girls I befriend for exactly that reason is utter horse shit, and unsolicited "advice" from concern-trolling "I'm one of the good ones" lady-friends is contemptable.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:08 PM
1

*your
/r/MensRights06/09/12 11:37 AM
-9

Is it really so much to ask that people mind their own fucking business regarding their friends' personal lives?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:16 AM
-11

There were a few others in that thread advocating killing the ex as well. And LOL @ Hardware Questions comparing himself to Malcom X. Not. Even. Close.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 10:33 PM
0

Why?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 10:23 PM
-2

Why is she irresponsible? The fact that her daughters have different fathers? My dad's kids have different mothers. Does that make him irresponsible? Even though he was the custodial parent?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:03 PM
-9

How is there such a thing as part-time h.s.? Has it occurred to you that your daughter wanted to go full time, and not drop down to part-time simply so her father could get out of paying c.s.? (Just a thought.)
/r/MensRights05/09/12 05:12 PM
-6

So straight men and lesbians can use men's locker rooms, then? You are a fucking idiot and a troll.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:59 PM
2

Well I hadn't thought of it that way. It is a somewhat new account and a bit discombobulated, but not entirely unbelievable.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:49 PM
0

It truly sounds like a nightmare.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:11 PM
6

I'm a bit unclear on something - did you want your daughter to drop out of high school? I'm unable to retrieve your court documents on the NV Co. CA Superior Court site to look them over. A for-life spousal support is very unusual in this day and age.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:18 PM
3

I recall hearing about this somewhere before. Very sad.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:05 PM
0

*cunt *bitch *bitches Reported.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:30 PM
0

LOL ok buddy.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:34 AM
-3

Oh, plenty. Looks like someone isn't familiar w/ sarcasm.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:22 AM
3

Deep breaths, one step at a time. And please, you are not helping anyone by committing suicide. See what your atty. says, take it from there.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:03 AM
-1

As though I have time or inclination to wade through the rape apologism I've seen here, even in the last 7 days.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:09 PM
1

If you're taking things from 4Chan and holding up feminists as defenders of chivalry, you're already off to a rocky start. I still don't quite get why you are bringing up an Australian case to illustrate the double-standard in American law.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 10:38 PM
6

Poster 1 looks more like a PowerPoint slide than a poster. Also, "mother" should be "mothers." Further, the sentence doesn't really roll off the tongue. Poster 2 doesn't make any sense. Who cares about feminism? Or chivalry? Hasn't chivalry been proven to be detrimental to both sexes? Poster 3, why is one of the sources a link to an Australian case? I assumed you were referencing VAWA - is there an Australian Violence Against Women act that you are protesting against? edit: I see now that you sa…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 09:09 PM
-7

But of course, we all know the power of the MRM is that there is no official policy or organization. Right?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:58 PM
-11

I'm not stupid. Only pointing out some of the hypocricy I've seen here from time to time.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:01 PM
-30

So now you think being coerced/blackmailed into sex at the workplace by a colleague is rape? I thought this day would never come, MR! But what will Paul Ryan have to say about it? (I especially love the guys saying that because she wasn't all that hot, it was even worse.)
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:12 PM
-5

Likewise. I don't owe "nice guy" or any other person anything.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:02 PM
-1

I do not think a man who murdered his abusive father, of whom both he and his mother were terrified, after the father had been charged and convicted of violent crimes against them in the past, deserves life in prison, no. Do you have a point otherwise? Or are you talking about the father? No, I do not believe the father deserved to die, as despicable as he was.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:52 PM
-12

Oh, I'm sorry, I did not know that Canada and Australia operated on the same system of laws. The court accepted the guilty plea to the lesser charge, and withdrew the murder charge, because Chen was suffering from an "abnormality of the mind" due to mental illness and the belief Peng was going to take their child to China. Zhou Fang did not use mental illness as a defense. Based on his history of abuse, perhaps he could have.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:34 PM
-4

Committed in a public place such as a library? With a fucking crossbow? hardly. If you're arguing this woman deserves jail time, then why do you think Zhou Fang does not? More interesting facts from your article: [attorney] Mr. Goldkind said it was rare for a jury to grant a complete not guilty verdict in a murder trial where the attacker admitted the killing but argued it was justified. Most killers in Canada are male, with men accounting for about 9 in 10 accused in homicides...women are about…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:12 PM
-7

So you're saying the son did not violently and publicly murder his father, and does not deserve jail time?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:02 PM
1

So women have nothing to fear moving through a ghetto? Truthfully, I'd say most crimes (including sexual assault) are committed against those known by the perpetrator (this includes drug-related murders in the inner-city), so it's kind of moot.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:20 PM
-5

Not likely. He murdered his father/abuser in a particularly violent and public way. I am not sure about Canadian law, but that would amount to premeditation negating a battered persons' defense. Considering the allegations against the father/abuser were provable, however, a life sentence seems to be rather harsh. I hope the son (and mother) are able to get the mental help they no doubt need for such an alarming amount of abuse.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:09 PM
-4

Really? Because I'm seeing a whole lot of people here saying it does, more or less.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:46 PM
-4

And then the day came, when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to Blossom.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:33 PM
2

Prison. The very imperfectness we have seen in the U.S. criminal justice system is reason enough to oppose state-sanctioned murder.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:17 PM
11

Sorry. Still doesn't "deserve" to be assaulted/set on fire.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 10:03 PM
-2

Is divorce, hookup culture and single mothers are a tool of feminism? LOL, wtf does that even mean? Two "be" verbs with direct and indrect objects?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:22 PM
1

Or is the court going to see it as her responsibility because she's being promiscuous? WTF does that have to do with anything? On a more paranoid note, what if a prostitute pokes holes in the condom to intentionally trick me into impregnating her? Does her act of fraud get me off the hook in that case? Maybe, going forward, you should only fuck women you trust and care about.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 12:31 AM
1

I am a woman. When I had manual locks, I always opened my passenger's door for them first. Now that I have automatic locks, I just unlock from remote and we get in at the same time. I think it is extremely rude when a driver gets in first then reaches across the car to unlock passenger's (or passengers') door(s), gender regardless.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 12:11 AM
1

I may hate the LP even more than the GOP, though!
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:57 PM
1

Ah, understood. That context makes sense. I was raped at 15 and sexually assaulted by the same person at 17 but he was a peer not an adult.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:07 PM
1

I think you fundamentally do not understand the concept of privilege.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 04:18 AM
8

Wouldn't it be awesome if we were all just born the sons of wealthy political dynasties so we could run the world one day?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 10:44 PM
2

I was new to the school - a public school after always going to Catholic schools - plus I was a weirdo. I left the Catholic school due to bullying as well. I fought back/didn't back down in either school, which I think just made it even worse. I get the last laugh since I didn't have 4 kids by my 21st b-day and get tubby, though.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:56 PM
1

I was bullied in h.s. by both girls and boys. The girls would actually try to fight me, while the boys would catcall, pick at me (flinging spitballs in my hair, paperclips, etc.), harrass me on the phone, and on one occasion they threatened to rape me (they thought I was a lesbian). I was not a virgin.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:14 PM
-6

A very longwinded snowflake. We already have a GWW.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:16 PM
2

That is why I am a Very Special Snowflake!
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:55 PM
1

No I didn't ignore I skimmed it and just saw assumed it was a woman b/c the name was Terry (which is one of my aunt's names) and they coached girls' b-gall. I just really didn't think mean were capable of such things and never had to spend a day in prison for them.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:37 PM
1

Oh I am sorry I thought it was a woman b/c it was a woman's team and their name was terry.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:11 PM
-1

Because this woman was charged with sodomy and sex abuse, got a pussy pass, and will never see the inside of a prison cell, even though she abused her position in order to molest children.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:04 PM
-1

She was originally charged with sodomy and sexual abuse and will never see a prison cell.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:33 PM
2

Yes, if you are implying that I hate men because of the actions of two other people nearly 10 yearsa go.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:22 PM
0

Exuse me?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:03 PM
-3

(This is where a bunch of MR users tell you to go fuck yourself and that you are a mangina concern troll.)
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:06 PM
3

Look out for yourself. She is probably looking to somehow gather your sweat, change the chemical makeup of the cells, and impregnante herself with them. Only work out wearing a full-body condom and be sure to FLUSH IT out of her sight.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:44 PM
1

Don't be scared, but wait at least 10 years before even considering it. You're way too young to get married now.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:26 PM
1

Does it need to be someone from Philly? I was raped at ages 15 and 17 and attempted rape on me when I was 19, but #1 I am a woman and #2 I do not live in Philly.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:07 PM
1

Funny how she didn't try to ruin his life until myself and others asked what his beef with her was.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:47 PM
-13

Well isn't that quite a coincidence.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:52 PM
-24

So the mother, who did nothing wrong whatsoever in believing her daughter's not all-that-outlandish lie, is dying and you have no sympathy for her? I mean...if someone held your daughter down and sexually assaulted her, what recourse do you think should be taken? It's understandable to not be particularly upset or moved by a near-stranger's illness, but to harbor such childish feelings and grudges from high school? Yeah, I'd say you're an asshole.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:30 PM
3

But men don't have to complete any military service, even after signing up for the draft. So this makes no sense. You seem to think men are forced into a draft. They aren't. There has been no draft in the United States for 40 years. How about, "abortion is legal and women can have as many abortions as they want until the government decides to go to war and reinstate the draft, at which point, it will require women beginning at age 18 and up to age 25 to be impregnated, unless they are in school,…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:59 PM
1

Wrong about what? Thinking you are needlessly paranoid in blaming outsiders for your downvote brigades? Nope.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:48 PM
1

So you call men cupcakes? Doubtful.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:06 PM
0

My little brain? Twisting words? Cupcake? You must be a feminist here trying to make all MRAs look like misogynists.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:42 PM
1

Yes. It's a huge feminist conspiracy. There is clearly no real possibility that subscribers from /MR actually go to other subs and downvote things.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:44 PM
1

In some states it is a crime, even if the student is of legal adult age, if the student is still in high school.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:31 PM
1

If you are in your early to mid twenties you have a good 10 years, give or take, of fucking around and having fun until you find the love of your life. When you do, she will love you and your son.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:01 PM
1

Obama is a liberal? You learn something new every day!
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:38 PM
-2

Who is Steve?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:27 PM
-4

Hey, you don't know me! I'm not just another girl! I can do things for myself. Ragghhh! Join me. It's fun being a snowflake.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:09 PM
-4

women entitlements, minority entitlements LOL. Who is the single-issue voter?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:45 PM
-17

I think thou does protest too much.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:02 AM
1

It may be feminists downvoting themselves to make us look bad This seems to be the go-to MR answer when any MRA anywhere does something asshole-ish.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:51 AM
0

the man doesn't need to pay for the child if the two parents are no longer together. What in the actual fuck? You, my friend, have a fundamental misunderstanding of the word "contract."
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:26 AM
1

I thnk there are a few third party candidates running, though not sure if they will be on the ballot everywhere.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:07 AM
2

It is rather simple to get them recalibrated, and they typically do not need recalibration more than once/year.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:21 PM
4

Well, the mouth is not the vagina or anus, and the breathalyzer is not a sex organ.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:09 PM
-2

Because I'm a very special snowflake, just like you. A better question to ask might be, "Why do MRAs frame questions in a combative way when allegedly seeking to find a middle ground?"
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:24 PM
-5

Or, another way of thinking about it would be, "Do you think MRAs can ever get along with feminists?"
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:19 PM
1

I know when I think of angry, outraged humorless feminists, I think of mocking, funny product reviews of ink pens on Amazon.Co.Uk, many of which were obviously written by men.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 05:36 PM
-10

I have never heard of this double standard before on this subreddit. Thanks for enlightening me!
/r/MensRights29/08/12 05:07 PM
-1

Truly a novel concept.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:19 PM
-1

Not a good start to your career. Cheating and dishonesty, however - hey' dude'll make a great lawyer!
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:32 PM
1

Pretty rich coming from a woman who has never had to worry about money, ever.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:54 AM
-1

I like how you can't differentiate between "academically and professionally unethical" and "illegal," though! You are good at stuff too!
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:41 AM
-1

Lots of men falsely accused of rape and domestic violence, no doubt. It is all part of the gynocratic conspiracy.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:16 AM
2

I think I have a much better understanding of how nonprofits are funded, with all due respect. The PP a-fund is funded solely through private donations. Statewide agency a-funds are also funded solely through private donations. Government funding to PP or other charity care centers is explicitly not to be used for abortions (not that I agree with that.) As far as private insurance, most states ban the use of private insurance being used for abortions. Flexible spending and health savings can sti…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:57 AM
-14

There is nothing moral or ethical about forced pregnancy.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 09:08 PM
0

You pay for war. Presuming you live in the United States, that is. You also pay for inmates to be killed by the state, providing you live in a state that still allows capital punishment. You don't however, pay for abortion in any capacity.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:48 PM
-4

Helping would be saying, "I sort of remember this happening in this time frame in this state, maybe you can find it." Cheating is saying, "Hey, go do my fucking research for me, which is hugely important to my actually becoming an attorney, then give it to me on a platter because I am so very very busy with other things." I have no doubt his prof. would take major issue with this.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:35 PM
-4

Um. Learn to wikipedia better: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial-Birth_Abortion_Ban_Act I could go down and cite every state statute that makes late-term abortion a crime, but I have a difference it'd make no difference, and I have class in 45 minutes. If you're going to be like John "health reasons" McCain, you can GFY.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:20 PM
-15

If a fetus is developed enough to survive outside of the mother's body it blows my mind that it is legal to "terminate" as long as it is still inside the mother's body. There is no state in the United States where this is legal. Most people that are against abortion believe it is murder and are not going to suddenly change their minds. Most All people that are against abortion are idiots.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:01 PM
-7

Because I worry that someone in the same profession I'm going into is cheating? And that people here are encouraging it? Yeah, ok.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:55 PM
-7

Fuck off, TyphonBlue. Cheating - esp. in LAW SCHOOL - is a big fucking deal. Especially when your instructor serves on the Ethical Leadership staff. http://www.stthomas.edu/law/academics/academicpolicymanual/otherpolicies/codeofstudentresponsibility/ http://www.stthomas.edu/law/academics/academicpolicymanual/academicstandardspolicies/otheracademicstandardspolicies/academicmisconduct/
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:39 PM
-10

Do you not understand that in all the "what about this" scenarios you list, you are the one making the queries? And it is not (necessarily) less efficient that Westlaw or Lexis-nexis because people are already weeding out bad results for you. Reserach librarians assist you, they do not do your research for you. You will not have anything "covered" if and when cheating in your coursework comes back to bite you in the ass.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:57 PM
-11

Did I not say I would do the work? Research is part of that work. I'm using tools at my disposal to compile information that can be utilized to produce a finished product. No. You are asking other people to do that for you, however. I'm not lazy. I didn't say you were lazy. I said you are attempting to get others to do research for a 3L class for you, which is cheating and is a big fucking deal. Good luck sitting for the bar if you get caught. I'm not trying to avoid the work. So then why are yo…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:01 PM
-1

Sure, buddy.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:48 PM
0

Unfortunately that's what men have to resort to because the law isn't on their side. Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't really think men "had to resort to" possibly raping people and then belittling them after the fact. I did not think that was what the MRM was about. Frankly I think PUAs have no place in this conversation, and your "advice" for the OP is terrible.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:53 PM
-15

Networking isn't "having someone else do your research for 3L paper on Crime & Punishment." I'm sorry it's a "little hard," but you should know by now how much time and work law school takes.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:37 PM
-10

Wasn't Legal Research one of your first classes?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:00 PM
1

The first night my sister went home with her now-husband, this happened. Happily ever after.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:31 PM
-4

So basically, "How to berate a woman after maybe raping her."
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:20 PM
1

Women and men are just born different. (Except with respect to physical activities, in which case, segregation in sporting is bad.)
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:06 AM
1

The straw rapist.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:38 PM
0

Does your school have a law clinic?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:24 PM
2

So what. God isn't real. So why should "religious teaching" supercede "cultural thing"?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:13 PM
0

It really depends what state you are in. This same scenario actually happened to my older brother, only the man who would be the fiance of the woman died rather than found out he wasn't the bio-dad and fled. She may have a hard time getting you to take a paternity test if someone else is already on the birth certificate, etc. Still, it probably will happen, so talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:44 PM
1

I'm talking about "religious exemption." FGM is practiced by many Islamic countries in Africa and the Middle East. And of course sexual abuse has widely been practice by Roman Catholic Clergy.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:33 PM
2

I am not an anti-circumcision extremest though I do oppose it, but there should not be religious exemptions for things society deems legal or illegal. Just think if there was a religious exemption for child sexual abuse. The catholic church would get off scott free. And religious exemptions for doctors, nurses and pharmacits who don't "believe in" birth control, even birth control is perfectly legal. Should there also be an Islamic exception to FGM?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:30 PM
-3

In most, if not all United States, a 19-y-o can have sex with a 17-yo-o. If someone is too drunk to give consent, it is rape. Further, the woman's body does not magically prevent or terminate a pregnancy if it is from the result of a stranger violently and forcibly raping a virgin, which is what Akin was alluding to in his comment.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:59 PM
-3

I find it interesting that a woman leads the policy research paper.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 01:40 PM
6

So basically every data point you provide, "pullout" is 2x more likely to fail than condom use. Ok, buddy.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:22 AM
3

It's Karl Rove's PAC. LOL...I am no fan of Obama, but I find it hard to believe the "legitimate rape" GOP will be any better when it comes to "women's issues."
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:53 PM
7

You are citing FERPA, which deals with student records, not student pickup. The subsection you cite also makes it clear that it applies to either parent unless there is paperwork of legal separation, etc. It does not say both parents. I am very sorry you have not been able to see your son, and I do hope you will be able to work it out very soon. However, the school was well within its rights and was merely protecting itself from liability and from a lawsuit from either you, your ex, or both. If …
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:23 PM
-21

Sure showed me! Armed grocery store robbery overshadowed by a shooting spree in on of the USA's largest tourist attractions = MISANDRY!
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:28 PM
-32

Yes, we'll see just how truthful that turns out to be.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:45 PM
-21

Well, he did open fire in a historic landmark, shooting 10 people. There's a bit of a difference in how that is covered and a robbery.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:11 PM
-45

I wonder who the shooter was at the Empire State Building today.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:47 PM
-3

I was able to find the following: http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TCA/2010/conew_043010.pdf It looks like the mother thought there was abuse going on, and worried that sexual abuse ran in her ex's family, but doctors never would indicate to her that abuse was actually happening. (She did leave her son uncircumcised, though.) The mother took her child to various doctors and mental health professionals because she worried of abuse, but none would confirm it. It was not until summer of 2007 that a ph…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:25 PM
4

Dr. Drew is a bigot and a shamer of the highest order. I haven't listened to Loveline in ages, but do remember that being a quality of the show when it was aired on Television when I was in middle school or so. When I have seen him on these rehab shows, I notice he's not only sexist and shames people, but he is also quite exploitative.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:53 PM
-1

Unless you don't want to have any responsibility for the pregnancy and ensuing child, in which case, the magic of financial abortion and "it ain't my fuckin' baby."
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:40 PM
-2

I would like to know why the court gave primary custody to the father after several source substantiated rape allegations against him. It seems as though the whole story isn't coming out.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:28 PM
-2

The fact that campus is 75% male may be a justification for why they have a Women & Gender center. (Incidentally, campus fee guy never did answer the question where he went to school so the fee could be verified independently. Funny, that.)
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:08 PM
3

I thought there was a "Movember," though? edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movember
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:57 PM
-5

It's really unclear what you are asking, but I'll give it a shot. I suppose that if a woman is friends with a man, knows the man is romantically interested in her, but she is only interested in a close friendship with him, it would be a good idea if they refrained from close-touching (i.e., hands on legs or laps while watching a movie or something), kissing, heavy petting or sex.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:47 PM
-1

not a particularly hard position to take on a topic like this Evidently it is.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:18 PM
-1

Yeah, I don't know.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:03 AM
-2

I don't like her writing usually but I think she makes an apt point about rape accusations and due process.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:52 AM
-1

Yes I did. Why would I lie? I got a mod message that it had been deleted.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:56 PM
-2

This is odd. I posted a story by her on Raw Story about rape, accusations, and due process and mods deleted it. I wondere why yours stands? http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/23/how-would-a-rape-exception-work-hint-it-wouldnt/
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:05 PM
0

Irreconcilable differences should be grounds to grand you an expeditious, no-fault divorce in IL, but you do have to wait 6 mos. She will have to actually prove mental cruelty in order to go that route. Depending on where in IL you live, you should have access to a law clinic where students (under faculty supervision) can assist you. Your state or local bar association should also have a referral service that can help you find pro-bono or reduced-rate attorneys.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:49 PM
-2

And it seems a little trolly. I know you're seeking on behalf of your husband. However, that is not how you titled your post. Why did you come here rather than TwoX (geared for women in your situation), LegalAdvice, Daddit, etc? You didn't answer number 3. Of course they were hitting each other. I hate that number. I searched "work" and "employment" in OP, and no mention is made of your job. I didn't say she wasn't quitting. I said she "couldn't keep a job." Which she couldn't. Whether fired or …
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:38 PM
0

Where do you go to school? We have a women's center on campus, but no fee other than "student activities fee."
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:18 PM
-3

1 - This is your very first post ever. 2 - Your title is misleading. You are not a father seeking advice. You are a step-mother. 3 - Who the fuck gets married after knowing someone less than a year? 4 - Way to blame your stepdaughter's mother for staying with an abusive man. She is obviously an easy target for someone like that due to her mental state and substance abuse. 6 - Neither you nor your husband work, and you're judging the mother for not being able to hold down a job in the midst of me…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:08 PM
0

According to the OP, while his wife did file it to make the divorce more expeditious, she also did feel genuinely mentally abused. What state is this in, OP?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:28 PM
6

I would just tell her that you understand she wants to get it over with, and that you don't argue about it or want things to get ugly, but you can't consent to the divorce under those terms.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:36 PM
1

What, exactly, are you asking? Seeing your daughter 4-5 days a weeks is pretty good considering the circumstances, and it sucks that your friend (or ex-friend)/baby's mother is reducing the time. Unfortunately, I suppose you will have to be patient until it gets settled in the courts. Try not to get too upset or worried until you are able to go to court over it. Do not be terribly surprised if/when she or the court files an order for child support, however.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:16 PM
-1

I get offended by very little. Because I call someone for being a racist, using racist language, or condoning partner violence, does not mean I am "offended." Try again, champion.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:59 PM
0

I am not a big fan of Amanda Marcotte but I apprecite that in 2 of her 3 points, she takes into account false rape allegations and due process for those who have been accused of and charged with rape.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 03:46 PM
1

And yet I'm banned from feMRA. Hmm.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:58 AM
1

legitimate rape Such a popular phrase lately!
/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:32 AM
3

Will you be getting married and residing in Canada, as well? TBH, it is none of your in-laws business. Are they wanting to amend/add to an existing pre-nup that you proposed? Or was the whole thing their idea. Is the inheritance your finaces or yours? How can they possibly know whether your spouse will even want to be a stay home parent or if that will be the right arrangement as your family grows. Sounds awful and frankly, grounds for cold feet.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:13 AM
-1

Ok, thank you for clarifying. However...it is still literally impossible for men to get an abortion. Severing financial ties/obligations to your child is not abortion. There should be a different terminology, IMO.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:58 PM
-1

There is no such thing as 'financial obligation abortion.' That is literally something you or someone just fabricated out of thin air.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:58 PM
-1

Do they also offer free entry for moms? Otherwise, SHITSTORM.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:42 PM
-1

Abortion is the termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to viability.[note 1] An abortion can occur spontaneously, in which case it is usually called a miscarriage, or it can be purposely induced. The term abortion most commonly refers to the induced abortion of a human pregnancy. Tell me how a man can do this.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:17 PM
-1

Feminists tend to be against abortion for men however. I wonder how come.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:50 PM
1

Semantics? You mean like "knowing what the fuck I am talking about?" Yeah, that's hard.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:50 PM
1

Oh, now so YOU speak for LGBT and transgender? And I'm the bigot. LOL ok, buddy.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:09 AM
-2

You probably buttfuc k.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:56 AM
1

OMG sorry I thought transphobes were horrible human beings my wrong.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:14 AM
1

Or, how about: I would rather my tax dollars go to programs that allow people to have fun and fuck each other without pregnancy than punish people who will fuck anyway with pregnancy, STIs, or even death. Also, being that you can't distinguish b/w Medicare and Medicaid at any rate, it is hard for me to take you as an authority on the subject.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:19 PM
1

if the use of the birth control is purely to have sex without getting pregnant, then he believes it should not be covered So fucking is a luxury only for the rich? And we want a bunch of low-income people getting pregnant out of spite, so that we can go on to pay for their children for years to come? OK, makes sense.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:15 PM
-9

Good for you, doing the minimum thing possible for you not to be a rapist and an asshole! I know that is really out of the ordinary here! Bonus wooo points for transphobia!
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:00 PM
3

Pretty sure if you are on Medicare, you have no need for birth control.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:49 PM
1

It's very sexist, though I know users here will heartily disagree. You're basically saying, "Here's this slang term for a woman's anatomy, and I am using it to mean that is something bad." The same with calling someone a dick or dickhead IMO.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:34 PM
5

Yes, I especially like how she sold our invasion of Iraq as legitimate and did backbends to assure our country could continue torturing people.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:18 PM
-17

you have probably had sex with him before. Inconsequential. You wake up with wood and just stick it in? Not rape, but certainly not healthy for any relationship. Wow.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:50 PM
1

Ah, Cato Institute, a bastion of an unbiased source if I ever saw one.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 03:44 PM
-10

But an off-kilter rant is...constructive to men's rights, how?
/r/MensRights19/08/12 01:57 AM
-58

Wow. Angry?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:19 PM
0

You do realize that... "Pussy Riot" is a band name, right? And that they were not actually inciting a riot? And that they are not based in the UK? And that they were convicted of "hooliganism" for political speech and not causing moral panic from being drunk? Yeah, not following you, Penis.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 02:11 PM
0

Oh sure. Comparing divorce to the Holocaust isn't minimizing it at all. You can now understand how people can murder or commit suicide. You seriously think I'm going to believe that woman has any fucking grasp of the Holocaust, as a Jewish woman or as the descendent of her grandparents? Of course, she can barely get subject-verb agreement right, muchless write a decent, in-depth article about the plight of divorced fathers in Israel. This article is nothing more than a flaccid rant. I'm sorry, b…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:47 PM
-1

This happened in the town I went to undergraduate in. Since it was on campus, the claims of destroying private property were unfounded. The only thing "indecent" about "leftards" (hey nice way to slur the mentally disabled!) throwing condoms on church lawns is that it is indecent to litter. Of course, I think it's also indecent to protect child molesters, to preach against birth control and homosexuality, but whatever.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:33 PM
0

You've never heard of Mumia Abul Jamar? Or the WM3?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:32 AM
0

Every word you say there is shit, but I'll start here and tell you why: Someday you may come to realize that having relatives murdered in the holocaust marks you and makes you aware. My best friend's grandparents lost friends and family in the Jewish Holocaust. Does that give me a deeper sense of history of WW2 and Nazi persecution? What about what my Dad saw in Vietnam? Or my grandfather in Germany?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:13 AM
0

What dept? In the college, or another entity?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 02:34 AM
2

There are people all over the Western world calling for their release I didn't say there weren't. I said that it's ridiculous to say "if these were men they'd be saying 'put them in jail'" b/c these women are already obviously in jail. and criticizing Putin. Uh. So what?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 02:23 AM
-1

She is not speaking on behalf of holocaust survivors. She is giving her account of the system in Israel and comparing it to the Holocaust which she is intimately acquainted with. How is she intimately acquainted with? Hot damn, my grandparents lived through the depression, ran a farm, and my grandfather and father both were in their generation's wars. You think I know shit about any of what they went through? Please. That is Godwin through-and-through.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:22 PM
-1

People do want them thrown in jail. Hence the sentence.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:12 PM
-1

Of course, that is not actually what the Think Progress link says or insinuates, and you're essentially quoting, verbatim, a known homophobic hate group. The whole notion that the SPLC somehow caused this shooting is laughable. My enemy's enemy is not my friend.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:55 PM
3

In the USA, a similar act would likely result in a misdemeanor as well as a fine and/or community services. No one would be "locked up," unless property was destroyed, vandalized, or someone was injured. I doubtfully would be charged as a hate crime. If someone intrudes into your house, you have the right to use physical force to get them out and ensure your and your family's safety. A church is not a private home. You do not determine anyone being locked up, I'm sorry to tell you.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:42 PM
-1

If a Jewish woman, granddaughter of holocaust survivors, compares and explains why the situation of divorced men in Israel is similar to the holocaust, it may not be Godwin's law. Which I addressed. In my comment. She has no right to speak on behalf of Holocaust survivors, and b/c she is Jewish doesn't make it any more okay to use this horrible analogy. It's almost as bad as when racists make the claim that they have black friends. It may be a valid comparison... No, not really. Not even close. …
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:29 PM
-1

There are numerous politically persecuted artists & musicians worldwide. Many of them get a great deal of exposure. Ai Weiwei, a Chinese artist, in fact had a major documentary about him that has been well-received. Burma alone has something like 2,000 political prisoners. Ganzeer has been arrested in Egypt, and Samantha Lo in Singapore. Then, of course, there are prisoners that aren't exactly "political" and certainly not artists/musicians, but who nonetheless garner a large amount of support f…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:17 PM
-1

I suppose the Israeli authorship is somehow supposed to make up for the fact that this is simply Godwin's law in it's purest state, and extremely out of line.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:57 PM
-1

I'd say it's 50/50. Or maybe less than that, as there are some people that are left out completely.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:09 PM
7

God, this is discouraging. The prospect of homeless you think would be a good motivator in such situations.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:17 PM
3

Brutal. That sounds par for the course in the U.S. though. How long have you been primary custody of your kids, and has the court said why there will be on CS from your ex?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:05 PM
9

Do you work full time and if so, have you done so throughout most of your son's life? If so, how were able to attain/afford child care? What country do you live in, and does it provide much assistance for single fathers?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:37 PM
1

I'm a bit confused. This all seems to be about a WordPress web site, of which the DMCA claimant may theoretically have cause to ask that her work/images be taken down. This also seems to happen a few weeks before the GWW copyright claims. If Amy Davis Roth was ashamed of putting her name out there or or otherwise scared to do so, do you think she would have filed that paperwork in the first place? (Kind of lessens the blow of this really being "breaking news," IMO.) Finally, who is Justin Vacula…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:23 PM
6

And additionally, by the nature of the homelessness, it is hard to get a good census of homeless people.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:25 PM
0

I lost my welcome long ago. And I'm not the only one who finds it more believable that this is a troll than is not. Or should we not apply the same amount of skepticism to men accusing people of sexual assault against dogs as we do to women accusing men of rape?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:11 PM
1

It's people like you who spread the idea that every person who looks in your direction is out to rape, kill, and skin you and wear you skin like a suit, or some other bullshit that causes us all to live in such a culture of fear. Not really. I'm one of those naive people who thinks others are generally good and who leaves her purse at a restaurant table in a big city because no big deal. You take your irrational distrust of every person on the planet and lock yourself away in your own home and l…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:50 PM
2

2-day account saying separated and "reddit you're my only friend now"???
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:35 PM
1

I really feel that sex should be something special and reserved for someone special. That's how you feel about it, and there's nothing wrong with that if that's what you think and what you need, but others shouldn't be judged for not abiding by that.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:24 PM
2

What she did, netiquette-wise, is deplorable, and I don't wish that on anybody. However, your girlfriend will not get very far in a civil suit seeking emotional damages.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:00 PM
1

Sorry I don't stay on my computer 24/7. Sadly, you are the only one I see owning anything.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:39 PM
0

Yeah, I don't get this either.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:06 AM
-2

Feel like I'm losing control of my life and it's all because I tried to help my son after he sexually abused our dog. He is probably false accusing his son of being a dog molester.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:49 AM
0

I won't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:36 AM
1

That's just how it is.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:21 AM
3

Yes, that sounds right.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:10 AM
0

White Canadian men. Just like descendents of slaves. http://www.theprovince.com/news/allowed+Christy+Clark+women+only+events/7084887/story.html
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:13 PM
10

I think it's pretty obvious in your screenshot that the second comment is meant to point out how ridiculous such "advise" is.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:02 PM
10

The FRC is now blaming the SPLC for the recent shooting that happened at its headquarters.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:52 PM
-13

Oh I see. You posted your comments so we could go there and upvote you, even though you're being unnecessarily confrontational there.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:10 PM
-2

That wasn't exactly what the post was about now, was it? I was asked out on a dinner date by a guy who was pretty similar to me in terms of age, background, etc. What I mean is, there was no culture shock going on here. We made a date to eat around 8 pm, after I got off work. When we got to the small cafe, my date announced he never eats after 6 pm so he won't get fat. He then makes me pay for my meal and watches me eat it as we have our "date." He then tells me that the next date will have to b…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:59 PM
1

It doesn't, really. I am talking about mass shootings, not those related to, say, domestic violence, drugs, etc.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:54 PM
-4

I just find it rather un nessacary that 'woman owned' had to be mentioned. But now that you know, you won't go there, right?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:24 PM
-6

So you're specifically not going there because it's a woman-owned business? (FYI, you can check ownership history through your state's secretary of state office, if you doubt it was started by a woman.)
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:08 PM
-5

I consider it harassment every time someone says "bless you" to me when I sneeze, but most of the time it's an "innocent comment" that shouldn't cause any issues. Same with your "innocent compliments". Just because someone interprets something as harassment, doesn't mean it is. Because harassers are just being polite and are totally misunderstood, I'm so sure.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:49 PM
-12

LOL. Or not, it seems.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:25 PM
-13

If women/feminists are to "own their shit," this should apply to men/MRAs too.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:07 PM
-3

I theoretically support rape shield laws. I do not support the concept of so-called male abortion. I support the concept of child support paid to the primary custodian. I do not support the concept that child support be paid to an escrow with total transparency to the paying party. I think alimony has its place, though as Boomers age and women are participating in the workforce more comparably (or maybe even to a greater extent) to men, it is becoming less necessary. I do not think women who wan…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:53 PM
3

As an avid camper with a clam, I have mastered the art of peeing over ledges.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:43 PM
1

Whatever. Be a prick if you want but if you want people to like you and not downvote you so much (Which you seem so desperate for), not being a dick is a prerequisite. I give a fuck only insofar as it makes commenting more difficult. I am sure that's the idea, though. Had net upvotes until GWW's cry for help, which I had nothing to do with other than finding it laughable.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:12 PM
1

She doesn't have low self esteem. She's just being truthful. It's a weasly thing to say "what if your mom had aborted you," which fundies say all the time. Guess what. If my mom had aborted me (LOL which I am so sure many of you would agree would have been preferable to my existance), "I" would not exist, it would make no difference to "me," so it's a stupid argument to begin with. Despite my name, I am not a special snowflake. I am just one of millions of people who exist now, who have existed …
/r/MensRights16/08/12 11:56 AM
1

Da fuck does that have do do with anything i axed?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 11:41 AM
0

Wow. This post is really reaching, Scupta. Pedophiles deserve to be demonized. This is because they are disgusting criminals. Men do not deserve to be treated as disgusting criminals. I mean your argument is really almost too ridiculous for words.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:53 PM
1

She said that lawyers are conceived by anal sex. Her point being that anal sex is dirty, degrading, etc. You can have that with a woman too. Do you reckon that's to whom she was referring? Two women pegging each-other in the ass with a double-dong? Plus it was a joke. Sorry, I don't think homophobia is funny. Is this because you are in law school? No. It's because I'm not a homophobic, sex-hating bigot. Is that butthurt I smell? Shooo, nasty. Yes she does want to expose them. Yes they are coward…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:43 PM
0

http://www.myorkutglitter.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/baby-cry.gif
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:28 PM
0

How is any of that trolling? 1) As an ally, GWW does, explicitly cater to "you" men. That's not even disputable. No, she doesn't cater to "all" men, or "men" in a general sense, but that's not what the poster said - he said "us men." Which GWW does cater to - she created a whole subreddit dedicated to it, created a blog dedicated to it, and created a Youtube channel dedicated to it. It's laughable to suggest that she doesn't cater to "you" men. 2) It's pretty easy not to be called out as a homop…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:31 PM
-1

The third link I posted in this goes directly to Triond: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/y9bdf/holy_shit_son_commits_suicide_due_to_his_penis/c5tibts I am sure you are too busy crying and playing victim to get your trolls down right, though.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:17 PM
1

Very true. There are literally no racist or sexist-against-women memes out there whatsoever.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:04 PM
0

PROOF.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:43 PM
0

Where have I actually trolled? What have I said that is "trolling?" Not kissing ass of every self-appointed MRA is not trolling, last I checked.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:25 PM
0

I find it pretty pathetic that a fake "news" article posted by a self-professed troll is the #1 submission in /MR now.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:26 PM
-1

I hope you are using "news" very loosely.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:13 PM
-5

Downvoted because the article is proven fake? Of course. So much better than to stick it to some random person on the internet than to give a shit about the truthfulness of what is submitted to your sub. Perhaps I should say, "His dick wasn't small, it was simply imaginary." I look forward to hearing how it doesn't matter that the story is a big fucking phony because misandry is real and this proves misandry against tiny dicks.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:00 PM
-17

Be respectful and downvote because it’s doesn’t contribute to the conversation, not because you disagree! Good luck with that. I just got 300 downvotes in about 16 hours b/c I told someone their lawsuit threat was bogus.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:49 PM
66

I am approximately 100% sure that this "news" is fake. It can't be substantiated anywhere, and then there's this: http://www.usmessageboard.com/general-discussion/132382-what-the-hell-is-newsflavor.html and this: http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=53470611 and then there's the "author" of the article: http://www.triond.com/users/Big+Brother Further, no one named "Richard Moore," age 18 died in the U.S. in August 2011. Bunk.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:26 PM
1

What do you mean, just post there and try to talk to people, talk them out of suicide? Is that sub for men only?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:39 PM
3

The judge is the husband of a prominent GOP senator. That sentence is disgusting, I know people who have been actually punished for way lesser offenses.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:20 PM
-3

You know, I'm sure with the right therapy, you could be less of a cunt. LOL, and here I thought Ms. feMRA could express a dissenting opinion without resorting to bullshit sexist slurs. Silly me.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:51 AM
-2

SNIFFLE
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:37 AM
-10

That leaves the door wide open to doxxing, harassment and suppression of speech. Yes I am sure you vehemently oppose those things.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:30 AM
-7

GWW is not "some single mom", she has been an active MRA for years. Yup. Aware of this. Sight unseen? We have all seen her face, she has public videos. Well in that case, she must be who she says she is. Victim card? She is stating the facts, which are that random assholes are making false copyright infringement claims against her. We all agree based on those facts that the situation is unjust. She's suggesting she sue and doxx those people, something she is purportedly against. I guess if I sta…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:37 AM
-11

What crime?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:06 AM
-21

Not really. Do you really think she's above taking her peers for a ride or garnering sympathy from men through this, just like the people she speaks against?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:17 PM
-1

Is that a FF plug-in or add-on?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:16 PM
-24

I doubt it. She specifically said she wants to expose them and called them cowards. I am sure this extends beyond a "personal level." I look forward to a fully victimized follow-up post about this, blaming nameless feminists for her terrible life.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:16 PM
-1

Yes, and neither of them are particularly despicable, disgusting, or sexist.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:12 PM
-21

LOL!
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:11 PM
-4

Didn't say she lied. Said she went off w/out telling him. He also insinuated that they were not always consistent about using it before then as well, in which he is just as culpable.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:10 PM
-1

Ain't just his girlfriend's baby, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:10 PM
0

How do you do this for streaming videos, such as ones hosted on Youtube? I have DTA but have never used for vid.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:09 PM
-2

Yes I am sure that no one has ever made fun of Roseanne Bar's body, Sarah Silverman's vagina, or Margaret Choe's face.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:07 PM
-16

Maybe the harrasserrs can be added to register-her.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:05 PM
-6

And most feminist bloggers i've seen write under their real names. Two have been doxxed before and don't particularly give a fuck.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:04 PM
-12

How would the attackers get her personal info, particularly if they submitted under a fake email address?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:03 PM
-7

As I am reading this, it would apply to the following scenario: GWW places a copyright notice on her video, knowing that she cannot/does not fully own copyright (lets say b/c she has stolen a clip or a song or something), and GWW can be penalized for that. It doesn't seem to apply to someone fraudulently reporting a copyright claim.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:02 PM
-26

So you want to doxx the people you think are attempting to doxx you?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:00 PM
2

Would it even actually be unlawful for them to have a policy (if they so wished) of taking down every DMCA-requested video without reference to the poster, no questions asked? Most likely, they can remove anything from their site for any reason.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:58 PM
-26

So you're just going to give some single mom hundreds of dollards, sight unseen, because she's playing the victim card, without any corroboration? God, this place is really starting to stink.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:58 PM
-16

Paranoid much?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:56 PM
-18

LOL HA HA HA
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:56 PM
-3

If the emails were faked (to file the complaint) then how could personal information personally get to those people to doxx her?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:55 PM
-43

The doxxers are simply using their means of free speech. Problem? I will engage an attorney and file a lawsuit against YT for their irresponsible automated copyright infringement claim process, which exposes individuals like me to the risk of real life harassment. Yeah. Good luck with that, shug.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:53 PM
0

You're telling me I haven't bothered to pay attention? That's rich, buddy.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:51 PM
-6

Do you honestly believe that a person allowing something to be put in a place they control is approval of the topic? Yes. Particularly when it is posted by a troll who his banned from its "brother" sub dozens of times. See, that's the thing about free speech. When someone supports it as strongly as I do, or seemingly as strongly as GWW and the other mods there do, it becomes a greater evil to remove speech you disagree with than to allow hateful topics to exist. That's cool. It's just that evide…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:49 PM
0

So in your worldview, there are tons of foster children and children in group care facilities who were taken away from their parents just out of convenience? LOL, whatever.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:46 PM
-5

I just read through that thread. Your entire argument is based on the idea that a post in a subreddit means that subreddit supports the content of that post. That is a very fallacious argument. Nope. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_tacit_approval Not deleting this post and advocating for discussion is specifically what that subreddit was designed for. When GWW is effectively defending that decision, you repeatedly accuse her of tacit approval of the subject matter. She does tacitly approve of …
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:52 PM
1

I should clarify that I am speaking of newborns. Do we have thousands of newborns in orphanages in the United States? I really don't see what difference that makes. Orphans are orphans, no matter what age. I personally do not full-heartedly support adoption because of the world-wide abundance of children needing homes. So...your alternative is what? If we do have thousands of children in orphanages, and these are children with able parents (not true orphans, who have no parents) then adoption sh…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:49 PM
-4

Yeah, sure. I'm a college graduate going into my 2nd year of law school and I can't tell the difference between "free speech" and "advocating radical ideals on a web page you moderate."
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:21 PM
3

I'd be a little bit skeptical until you can do more research. The org's contacts are in Italy and CA, but it is organized in Copiague, NY. It's bank account is in Italy as well.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:20 PM
6

We have thousands of boys and girls in orphanages and in the foster system. I am not sure where you got this information that the USA has no orphanages.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:53 PM
0

Keeping it classy in feMRA: Man thinks sometimes women who are beaten by their partners are asking for it: http://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRA/comments/y0nod/jto_brought_up_the_point_so_here_it_is_ferdinand/
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:50 PM
1

Yes, I find it rather annoying. Even if they're acting in good faith, they have to know it's going to go over like a lead balloon.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:49 PM
1

So what do you think that means?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:47 PM
2

In Europe, mostly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_leave#Europe
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:40 PM
-5

And for that I'm supposed to be somehow grateful to my benevolent overlord? GWW is approving of a post defending domestic violence. If a similar post was submitted saying sometimes boyfriends deserve a good smack in the face by their girlfriends (or worse) people here would go apeshit, but somehow the inverse is okay? Horse shit.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:39 PM
-8

http://www.definitions.net/definition/tacit
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:37 PM
-9

Leaving this horse shit thread up. Dodging every time I ask her why it's up, what purpose advocating domestic violence it has here.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:37 PM
-2

You are living in some disgusting butthurt fantasy world. Quit reading PUAs and try being a grown-ass man. You are intentionaly obscuring the line b/w speaking to a fucking woman like she's a god damn peer you might want to hang out with, and harassing a fucking woman who doesn't want to hear your shit.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:36 PM
-5

Homosexuality is natural and normal, too. I guess that wouldn't occur to you.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:35 PM
0

I apologize if this is a repost - I searched for the link and couldn't find it here. Do you think that there will be a growing income gap between men and women as more and more men opt out of the workforce? Do you think men, when they decide to return to their careers, will have a hard time finding jobs due to their absence?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:23 PM
-2

An old servers' trick.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 02:59 PM
1

You do realize that anti-Romney/Ryan != pro-Obama/Biden, right?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:52 PM
2

I agree with this. I wish the USA was like other countries that offer maternity and paternity leave.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:50 PM
-14

Wow. Don't quit your real job.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:48 PM
-3

To be fair, there was just yesterday yet another white, male mass shooter in TX. I am interest as to whey these shooters tend to be white men. Do you think it's because there is a stigma on getting mental healthcare?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:48 PM
-2

I say slam the door in everyone's face, man or woman. No preferential treatment for anyone.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:46 PM
-7

I love your strawomen.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:46 PM
-24

Yeah she's got great big balls, advocating domestic violence.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:44 PM
-17

Why does feMRA allow posts advocating domestic violence? I just want a fucking answer.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:44 PM
-13

I like how she keeps saying that shit on a thread where I repeatedly ask why it's appropriate to post links to blogs advocating domestic violence.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:43 PM
0

The strawrapist, of course.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:42 PM
0

It makes my quality of life poorer if people believe that I am "not a man". How old are you that you really think this has any actual baring on whether or not you are a man?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:41 PM
-10

If that's how you roll, you can take yourself and go get fucked. I'm glad you've really risen the level of discourse here.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:40 PM
3

That's really disgusting that your family treats them that way.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:39 PM
-1

No, you're not right. Women shouldn't harass men either. I do not take most of my perspectives on life based on fictional TV shows, sorry.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:37 PM
0

They are trying to convince themselves (and their peers, possibly) that they couldn't care less about female rejection and scorn, and hardening themselves against it. They are basically practicing being rejected. Obviously you've never been followed around two city blocks by someone asking if you have a boyfriend, if you want them to be your boyfriend, asking for your number, asking where you're going, asking what your name is, telling you you're "fine" and that they like your ass, while you're …
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:36 PM
-5

Looking at and speaking to someone does not always equate unwanted sexual harassment or conduct meant to disrupt, embarrass or intimidate. You don't read gud.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:32 PM
1

The age of consent is 18, with a misdemeanor if the minor has 3 or fewer years of difference with the major, and potentially a felony if the major is more than 3 years older. Penalties increase if the adult is 21 or older and the child is 15 or younger. It is automatically a felony if the minor is under 14. It is worth emphasizing that unlike some other states, the close-in-age rule in California (3 years) do not provide an exception nor provide any defense; it merely lowers the crime to a misde…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:31 PM
0

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=american+medical+assocation+%26+abortion+history
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:27 PM
-8

So it's either forever alone or be a sexual harasser? WTF is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:26 PM
1

Only women have cunts. Only gay men are "faggots." Only blacks are "niggers." Everyone has an asshole.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:25 PM
0

I'm sorry you think your manhood is determined by how violent you can be.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:24 PM
2

I am talking violent deaths, not specifically domestic violence.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:23 AM
0

I bet they also eat lots of bonbons.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:18 AM
1

Honestly, I am a fan of your model. Good luck getting either major party statewide or nationwide to support that, though.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:17 AM
3

It saddens me someone downvoted you for a common sense truth.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:16 AM
0

Let's repost your original statement, shall wee? Since you "never meant for your post to be interpreted as a universal definition of marriage." Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. I am a 24 year old male so this isn't my definite opinion in the matter. With that said let's jump into it. Marriage is a unit, a partnership, a bond meant to be definitive and pleasurable. Something you see grow and experience together, it is a decision made by two consenting parties and …
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:15 AM
4

I am curious as to what percentage of men murder women, men murder men, women murder women, and women murder men.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:04 AM
0

That comment is true. The AMA was an early adopter and supporter of abortion criminalization.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:03 AM
3

I am a woman. I've made no secret of that. I have no interest in marriage. I have no illusion that marriage is a "fantasy" or that there won't be "hard times." As a law student, I do think your assertion that "divorce is the best option if things slightly get hard," is utter horse shit. As expected, you are using "ad hominem" incorrectly" http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adhomine.html.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 02:49 AM
2

I don't know if it's because you're only 24 and don't know any better or if you're actually this stupid. Either way, I'm done with your bullshits, and I feel sorry for any woman duped enough to marry you.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:05 AM
1

Looking at and speaking to someone does not always equate unwanted sexual harassment or conduct meant to disrupt, embarrass or intimidate.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:03 AM
-1

I'm not your anything. Good for you getting someone fired when you did something just as shitty.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:00 AM
6

Some women do preemptively have their breasts removed if they are high-risk to develop breast cancer. Of course, these are adult women, not infants.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:59 PM
1

What kind of woman dislikes male attention? Believe it or not, some women do not give a fuck about male attention, especially if it's harassing. Some women are also not into guys, period.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:57 PM
-3

Wow. You're lucky, as it sounds very much like you instigated her calling you a homophobic name. I hope you're very proud of yourself.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:56 PM
0

How abut, "Don't hit."
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:54 PM
1

see also: /feMRA
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:54 PM
2

Listen - I'm certainly no fan of an adult raping a kid, especially when the kid is their kid. That is just...terrible, manipulative, sickening beyond belief. However, by all indications, it was the minor that recorded the sex on his phone. If he didn't have his mother's consent for that (shudder), I see no reason why she should be charged with CP.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:51 PM
0

In my opinion marriage is to have kids, etc. If you don't have/want kids then you probably don't want to marry Again, gay couples can't "have kids" without significant intervention. Neither can infertile couples. Are you saying there is no point to these people being married? divorce shouldn't be a default action, it should be a last resort in my opinion. So tell me, how do you have this very special, private insight about strangers' marriages? Because that's essentially what you're saying when …
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:48 PM
1

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shitlord
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:01 PM
4

You don't know how old your own niece is?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:57 PM
2

If you read the article, you'll see that the son had the porn.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:16 PM
1

No. On the daily fail site?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:15 PM
1

The actual charges: incest, oral copulation of a minor, contact with a minor for a sexual offense and sending harmful matter to a minor.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:15 PM
9

How much under 13? If your brother was diddling his 10-year-old daughter, I say that makes a difference.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:13 PM
0

Marriage is a unit, a partnership, a bond meant to be definitive and pleasurable. I think marriage means different things to different people. There is no one definitive marriage. , it is a decision made by two consenting parties and it is meant to last even after you're gone through the children both of you birthed. So same-sex marriage, childless marriages, marriages where one or both partners are infertile, and marriages in which partners choose to adopt are invalid or less-than? It also robs…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:12 PM
2

I read that and really cannot stand Katie Rophie.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:02 PM
0

The correct word is "fiance" not "wife."
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:02 PM
-2

Seig heil, brah!
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:43 PM
-3

Political correctness is a form of tyranny, as it prevents people from accessing a frame of mind that allows them to act according to the realities of the situation. LOL OMG R U SROUS?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:31 PM
-1

Even if it's run by a bunch of white nationalists, you'll gladly subscribe?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:57 PM
2

So you could, if you wanted to, rent a place for you and your children to live while finding a job? Possibly retain a lawyer?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:51 PM
5

Maybe I am nitpicking, but even if she is on her knees begging forgiveness, he still needs to leave, and you shouldn't be asking what's wrong with him. He's not the one hitting his spouse.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:23 AM
4

You're in an abusive relationship. Get out as quickly as you can do so. You are the primary caregiver, which puts you in a good position custody-wise. How long has it been since you've been employed? Do you have any of your own money or your own savings?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:22 AM
4

Your car is valued at $1,900-$3,025, and you're 17.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:09 AM
1

TBH unless you were already a donor, and a significant one, they will make note of it and move along, business as usual.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:03 AM
3

Were you a donor before?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 01:35 AM
-1

Problem?
/r/MensRights11/08/12 02:37 PM
0

Thomas Sowell, the black man racists hate to love!
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:46 PM
14

Does it drive anyone else nuts when people say "reverse sexism," as in the article? There is no such thing as "reverse sexism." Even if you're being sexist against males, you're being sexist, not reverse sexist.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:45 PM
2

Actually the equivalent would be impossible (ovaries) since most of women's sex organs are internal. Maybe dangling big long labias??
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:42 PM
3

I am pretty sure men are allowed to go topless. Nonissue. It's not like women are sudden allowed/encouraged to go around bottomless dangling out their tampon strings.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:41 PM
-1

IDK, it certainly isn't my dream, but as long as someone is up front about their intentions, I don't see the big deal.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:39 PM
3

Can you do a TL;DR? The title of the post is "Masturbating with a friend" and its posted in "Sex." So, you know..."He wants to fuck you" may not be wrong-headed.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:03 PM
1

I think you don't really know your fallacies very well. I didn't say no actual woman is like these stupid ass dreamstate ramblings. Just that I have never actually met a woman (or man) in real human life form (or even on the internet) who "wants attention for who they are." In fact, it's a ridiculous premise that rests on the false assumption that women demand respect or admiration simply for existing rather than working hard to achieve.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:02 PM
1

Of course I am.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:58 PM
2

Seeing the problems my brothers and male cousins have had in life - custody, depression, suicide, addiction, divorce, anxious masculinity, homelessness.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:42 PM
0

I believe that most women don't. In my experience, females want to be cherished for being "special" and for being unique. They feel that they should be revered first, and without question. Then you may find "achievements" in their behavior to compliment. I've never met a single woman like that in my life. Maybe girls in high school, but no grown-ass women.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:37 PM
1

What is, "Who they are?" I consider what I've achieved as part as who I am.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:04 PM
2

I certainly like to think that. Honestly the only think I would do if I knew I wouldn't get caught is have an open container and maybe smoke up in public. (Though I don't even do that any more.)
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:49 PM
3

I don't understand rationalizing your opinion with falsehoods or exaggerations when there is plenty of truth to do so with. Yes, real feminist of me.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:28 PM
-2

I was a bit apprehensive of this due to the fact that he used "??" as a source twice in his paper. From the paper you cite: On one occasion, a bomb threat was called into an ACLU meeting at which Steinmetz was scheduled to speak. Still nothing on her daughter's wedding. Not to say that a threat where she was going to be at an ACLU meeting is somehow better, but I don't understand rationalizing your opinion with falsehoods or exaggerations when there is plenty of truth to do so with. It appears t…
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:17 PM
-8

Is there any evidence of an actual bomb threat against the author? Google is linking to exclusively MRA pages. I find this to be very suspicious. Strauss (in the OP's link) makes the claim of a bomb threat against Steinmetz. I searched a news database and in 1998, he made the same thing about himself: Though these issues have been the subject of real acrimony in the world of sociology and social work -- Straus himself has received bomb threats for publishing these findings -- they have not made …
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:00 PM
1

I haven't seen it, so no spoilers! I do recall in undergraduate watching Alien (or Aliens?) in a film studies course and it being considered "feminist," so you're probably not too far off.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 01:36 PM
0

Has been removed, FYI.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 01:34 PM
1

Sounds like religulous garbage. They only exist in 3 states, two of which are southern (of course.)
/r/MensRights09/08/12 01:33 PM
0

But if your premise, "Men are simply more intimidating than women," is true, then how can it not be extended to EVERY man?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:45 PM
2

Or it is a spambot: http://www.reddit.com/user/coinyone2 I found out last week that my boyfriend ordered very expensive shampoo and conditioner and had it delivered because he was too embarrassed to go into a salon and buy it. :(
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:15 PM
2

correlation =/= causation
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:14 PM
1

Huh.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:12 PM
2

I clicked the link and it is about violence & hate groups, what does that have to do with MRM?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:11 PM
1

Ike Turner OJ Simpson Charlie Sheen Jim Brown Darryl Strawberry John Lennon Lawrence Phillips Chris Brown Mike Tyson Tom Sizemore
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:09 PM
2

There are a lot of really awful things about pr0n but...I don't "oppose" it unless it is done by coercion, assault, blackmail, etc.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 09:05 PM
4

$750,000 for an apartment that is less than 800 sq. ft.? Unbelievable!
/r/MensRights07/08/12 08:58 PM
6

Fair enough, but what do you mean by "Islamic culture" v. "western culture"? Are you saying it is religious in a way most US networks are not?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 08:55 PM
3

What is this so-called "evidence." Does the risk of death or killing another person increase with alcohol-consumption? I do think MADD is a bullshit lobbying group, but considering people in my parents' generation drank & drive like it was no big deal, I hardly think our response to it is overblown.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 07:46 PM
0

That Al Jazeera is a Muslim network? Nope. That's like saying that all American TV networks are Christian b/c Christians make up the populace. No no no.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 07:22 PM
-3

Your objection is irrelevant PC bullshit. Lol, it's cute when you act like you know what anything means.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 07:06 PM
-10

This only works if you concede that men are better at making the decision to rape people. I don't think that's what you really want to argue.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:22 PM
1

Arabic != Muslim, FYI. Al Jazeera is held by CNN.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:21 PM
2

Traditionalist Christianist "MRA" and blogger.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:06 PM
-2

You speak english unpossible bad.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:00 PM
1

Well you did link Dalrock.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:38 PM
2

Yes likewise. What the punishment would have been for her at 11 should be what it is now, if any.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:37 PM
8

There are groups that advocate drunk driving?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:36 PM
-11

Heterophoboa? Hetero provilege shaming? LOL, where do you come up with this stuff?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:35 PM
2

What does this at all have to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:33 PM
-3

So are you saying, you regret having your children?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:33 PM
0

I thought this was from FeMRA. I replied to it and said it sounded like Christian dominionist garbage.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:29 PM
5

Yes. My half-brothers' biological mom paid child support for them.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:42 PM
1

Did he do a good job? My dad painted my nails for prom. It looked terrible, he did it although he was coloring in a coloring book, and I was wearing long gloves anyway, but it's a favorite memory I have of him.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:41 PM
10

Dr. Drew is a despicable human. John Walsh I feel like acts in what he believes to be in good faith, where as "Dr." Drew is very much in it for the celebrity.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:40 PM
23

My older brothers and cousin babysat me all the time, as well as a few uncles. I also grew up Catholic. No molestation.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:39 PM
1

I couldn't see him beating her, I could see him slowly choking her to death, though, if it were a hands-on altercation. I will be honest, I hated Skylar with a passion the first 3 1/2 seasons, but that's all changed now. Team Jesse!
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:12 PM
1

Are you calling for my death?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:11 PM
0

Here u go, buddy. IDK why you are so obsessed with my cancerous ladybits but: http://www.beautifulcervix.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/hysterectomy-uterus-1024x651.jpg http://www.beautifulcervix.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/060509-d.jpg
/r/MensRights06/08/12 08:31 PM
1

LOL u mad bro? Hard being wrong?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 08:29 PM
1

Ad hominem, yawn, fart.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 08:29 PM
1

I understand that it's an issue of men's rights, it's wrong, it's irreversable, I am just saying the image, itself, doesn't work, because it's a man's body. If you lost the xplanatory text, the context would be totally different from the intent, which makes it a bad image to use for anti-circ campaigns.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 07:58 PM
1

So you have to have played the sport to be a sports journalist? I suppose in this case, no male journalist can ever cover a woman's sport or woman's sporting event, period. Howard Cosell was a namby pamby English major and lawyer (hey, that sounds familiar). I'm sure you hated him as well.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 07:57 PM
1

I don't know about "entitled." However, from all your friend knows, the biological father could have tried contacting the mother for years. An ideal arrangement would be for custody as already arrange, and then visitation for the older child with biological dad and grandparents.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 07:28 PM
1

Of what? My non-existent uterus? The scar that runs from my belly button to my pubes, which has long faded? Sorry, but I have zero compulsion to show you pictures of my body. That's a gross privacy invasion, and will do exactly nothing to quell your asshole behavior.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 07:20 PM
2

Who is this petition going to?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:49 PM
2

FYI: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/xquq9/did_anyone_else_notice_the_threat_of_false/
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:48 PM
2

Stay classy, LAMFF. You'll be glad to know I am both a cancer "survivor" and infertile. I hope you feel just cheery about it.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:47 PM
-2

YOu assume that because she happens to be a woman referree, that she is only a referee because she's a woman? Nice.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:53 PM
2

What the heck is "thug culture?" *edit: Bio indicates that she's Gloria Alread's daughter. I'd proceed with caution.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:47 PM
1

Because he acts like it's a huge slight against him and other men that a woman will referee hockey games. Truth time: it's not.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:44 PM
-2

Wow, are really this fucking stupid? Do you think Walt's character has not changed whatsoever in the duration of 4+ seasons? His involvement in meth hasn't been about providing for his wife/children in a long time. The only people that know him, really know him (Mike, Jesse, to an extent Skylar) all know how fucking dispicable he is. And don't try to give me "he just makes it, he doesn't deal it." I mean, Monsanto and Dow "just made" agent orange, too. Skyler kept him in a shitty job that he hat…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:40 PM
-1

It means that I have very little doubt that he's capable of physical violence against Skylar, as he has threatened and perpetrated violence and manipulation of others in the past.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:36 PM
1

Well, neither, it seems to me. I think it is making fun of the concept of feminits as non-shaving, man-hating, bra-burning harpies. From what I can discern, MRAs, while not fans of feminits, don't seem to view them like that.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:05 PM
1

This wouldn't work. Which of the parents would get to pay their rent out of the joint fund? The idea, I thought, as a "wishlist," not a joint fund. You could simply manually add items like rent or mortgage, healthcare, utilities, food, etc, as a generalized estimate of what 1/2 of those would be. Daycare, school, etc., also makes good sense.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:03 PM
4

True. But the bottom then says "infant circumcision." I think this image (with both the male and female bodies) would work best as perhaps an anti-rape ad for both.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:01 PM
2

I am appalled at the misandry rampant in spell checks. Even if you type "men's rights" in the "reply" box here, it underlines "misandry" and "men's."
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:43 PM
-4

stole $600,000 from him in order to give to the man she was sleeping with You do realize that once the IRS started looking into his shit, they'd start looking into hers and Walt's shit, too, right? he STILL treats her well OMG LOL Her character is self centered bitch... HA HA yeah so self-centered for not wanting her and her family to get murdered b/c of her husband's actions.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:39 PM
1

Alternately: Walt is not yet physically abusive, though he has actually murdered someone, threatens his wife, lies to everyone who loves him, is so money-grubbing that he's lost all sense of right and wrong.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:37 PM
0

The way Walt is progressing, it's just a matter of time before that goes down.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:36 PM
4

I got a good kick out of Mike's comments.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:35 PM
-1

You hate Skyler? And not Walt? And you think Skyler is manipulative? LOL, omg.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:35 PM
5

LOL, nice troll, bro.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:34 PM
2

Yeah it could also include health care, housing, heating/cooling, water, etc.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:32 PM
3

Why do you use an adult male body to protest infant circumcision?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:29 PM
1

Not sure about Florida. I wish the voting process would be overhauled nationwide, but that will never happen.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:58 PM
2

Thank you! From what I've been able to find, the argument from the Obama camp is, "The lawsuit claims the law is unfair because ordinary Ohioans can’t take advantage of the military’s right to vote during those three days." And, "It also notes that the Ohio General Assembly discussed the lawsuit’s main objection, that non-military voters were not accorded the same provision as military voters, and declined to change the wording of the law." Another, "Whether Ohio's current election law, which re…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:23 PM
1

"Them" who? NIH funds scientific research, which, to my knowledge, is not a participant in ACA.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:10 PM
1

Yes, I can tell.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:07 PM
1

From the link I provided, on Reddit's FAQ page" This includes links to public Facebook pages and screenshots of Facebook pages with the names still legible.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:06 PM
1

don't let others harass you Isn't that sort of the point of harrassment, though? That it's unwanted and not a matter of "letting" someone do it? It's in the very pictures. Yes I agree, as I said, they are over the top.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:04 PM
3

It would be neat to somehow incorporate this into some sort of fundraising campaign, so that you could actually see a concrete ROI of impressions and clickthroughs.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:36 PM
1

I'm sorry but I would like to see an item about this from a more neutral source. The article doesn't give any information, quote any DNC or Obama statements about the law or alleged suit, nor does it quote or link to the actual OH statute in question.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:33 PM
3

Ha ha! I was going to say *broken, but yours is much better.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:31 PM
-1

Wow. A feminist posted this? She must think as poorly of women as she does of men. FYI: http://www.reddit.com/help/faq#Ispostingpersonalinformationok
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:30 PM
1

I think you're reading a bit much into the ads, but then again the images the ads are over-the-top laughable. The message definitely could be gotten across much better, though.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:23 PM
1

Out of curiousity, could you empathize with her side at all? If not, maybe you should just agree to disagree and not comment on one-another's politics.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:09 PM
7

Those are...weird. Do you have better resolution images? When I try to zoom in the text on the posters is all blurry.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:17 PM
1

This is the 3rd (or more) time this has been posted, I think, just FYI.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:47 PM
3

The fact that the "dad" used a zip-tie to put his kid's hair in a pony-tail tells me he is resourceful. Judging by the picture, perhaps the kid put his or her own ponytail in the zip-tie. I started putting my own hair up around age 8, I think.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:46 PM
1

LOL, I had to book mark that one.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 01:30 PM
2

I would say my first year of law school piqued my interest, not in the MRM per se, but simply the inadequacy of the court system at times, and how men (and especially black men) are disproportionately in the system. Also because my older brother has had an ongoing custody conflict with his former wife and I see how that has really hurt him and our mother, and how it does nothing but hurt their little girl too.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 01:26 PM
1

Context would be nice.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 01:22 PM
2

The Perks of Being a Wallflower is a contemporary one I thought about off the top of my head. The protagonist isn't raped, per se, but does have sex before he really wants to or is ready, and has somewhat of a nervous breakdown. IIRC it also comes out he was molested by a woman in his family.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:40 PM
-2

but please don't vote or enter the argument. We're not a downvote brigade or subreddit invaders Yeah I think you got it wrong this time.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:19 PM
1

Aaah, okay! Ha ha, I guess I wouldn't know. :)
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:16 PM
0

That is a thoughtful analysis of the article. I won't read it myself because I find the site rather disgusting at times.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:08 PM
1

I think that there is a site called /MRMemes for things like this. I don't even understand the image, though. Is there some significance to an older white lady leaning against a tree?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:06 PM
6

My brother will be able to have health insurance. He is unable to get it through his employer since he works rather low-paying labor-intensive jobs and has had preexisting conditions. I hope he will be able to afford it on the state exchange.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:49 PM
1

I don't see what's so hilarious about this. Just a few people being sexist assholes thinking they're cute or funny.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:48 PM
4

Unsurprising. Do they also address how men can get free condoms?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:45 PM
2

This is a crime in many states, FYI. Maybe not the best advice. You can't proceed with your life and live with fear of what might happen. You can only be the best person you can be and strive to do well in your career, personal life, etc. You may be too young to remember, but honestly such fear reminds me of what happened not long after 9/11, when we basically allowed the government to spy on us and our neighbors with impunity...
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:45 PM
1

It's science. (Sorry I missed the part where the man's being punched and stabbed.)
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:42 AM
4

I agree. This sounds like a resoundingly bad idea.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 06:55 PM
2

You did not contribute to the OP, you did not contribute to the person trying to help the OP. You instead took it upon yourself to open up a dialogue that critiqued the grammatical identity of a statement of advice. Actually, if you will look at the whole thread, I actually did attempt to contribute to the OP. You certainly must have overlooked that in being so eager to jump down my throat for saying "or her." I can tell you right now that I won't be able to relay exactly why your above misstep …
/r/MensRights01/08/12 05:36 PM
0

I have never heard of this show. I think you are becoming a little bit exaggerated by saying that a woman could punch you or stab you with impunity just because she's a woman. It can be slippery, but you really have no "right" of retaliation if someone hits you, unless you are acting in self defense. If you have a reasonable way to de-escalate the situation, you have an obligation to do so. This applies to men or women of course.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:56 PM
1

It is the act of correcting that is offensive It is the act of correcting that is offensive It is the act of correcting that is offensive Why?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:52 PM
1

So you object to me saying that women can be lawyers, and that female pronouns can be used to refer to lawyers, yet you call me hypersensitive, shitty, and basically a feminist and troll for saying as much? I feel like if you believe it does not matter either way, why did you feel it necessary to single the comment out? I cannot help but think you find something objectionable about it that extends much further than you lecture to me. If my presumption that using the feminine pronoun when referri…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:30 PM
2

Right. And it seems like it will be a criminal as well as academic tribunal.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:55 PM
10

I actually read your whole post and your TL'DR is very poignant and succint. I like reading the other subs (femra and ladymras) as well, I am sure you will find many like minded people.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:54 PM
0

Fair enough. It has been a few years, anyway, and I always favored language/mechanics moreso than conversation and literature.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:51 PM
0

And my very first post to you explained why people were going apeshit. People choose how they behave and repsond to scnearios, and your explanation does little to account for that. In fact, you could have just left it alone, but you chose not to. Why? To prove some point about how it's not my place to make such jokes or "argue semantics" (when I wasn't) while participating int he piling on. Why do you keep trying to insert the presumption that my offense is with women becoming lawyers, even when…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:49 PM
0

Yes, as I said, ils is equivalent to English "they." English has no gendered plural pronoun. I well know my French pronouns and verb conjugations, I am not quite sure why you posted them. Yes, I am a law student. Yes, I was an English major. Yes, I minored in French (because I loved it) and CIS (because I thought it was more practical.) No, I did not live in France for 5 years, yet you are accusing me of throwing my pedigree (HA HA) around? Give me a break.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:46 PM
0

I do not consider myself a feminist. I had no intent to derail. I made a jab (half-serious, half-joke) that women can be lawyers too, and everyone went apeshit about it for reasons that are not at all clear to me. What is your "direct question" that needs answering?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:42 PM
-1

Okay, then. What is your exact problem with gender-inclusive pronouns?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:18 PM
-1

This came in on my news feed today. Of course the article does not name the "victim." IMO it is strange the "victim" would text her friend in the next room after and drive the "assailant" home.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:57 PM
-1

Using a pronoun with the intention that it be gender neutral does not "assume the default is a man". Um, yeah, actually, it does. That is kind of the whole point. English major, French minor, "ils," while "masculine," is more akin to the English "they."
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:47 PM
0

I'm sorry. I was under the impression that those who cared about men's rights also cared about equality, and wouldn't get so terribly offended at the suggestion that a woman could be a lawyer. My bad!
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:45 PM
0

Hypersensitive, really? You're the one that chimed in with your "uh-huh" wikipedia link about gendered pronouns. Sorry, I don't think it's really that big of a deal to say "s/he" or "him/her" when gender is unknown, rather than assume the default is a man.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:52 PM
-1

I don't think you meant to offend the way you just did. I'm about two and a half years away from being an attorney. You mean to tell me that acknowledging that women are also attorneys is offensive? Really? f your priority on these boards is to make sure every entry is politically correct with a "him or her" pronoun-set on the back of every genderless profession... you are going to have a bad time. I don't care if I have a bad time. "Politically correct" is nothing more than a term representing …
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:47 PM
-1

The use of "he", "him" or "his" to be used as a gender-neutral pronoun, however, is today seen by some as prejudicial. Derp.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:43 PM
-6

Or *her advice. They let us women be lawyers now too. :)
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:48 AM
1

If your child is on SCHIP, and was placed there by your ex, the state may be determining true eligibility by determining your income as well. Just a thought, anyway.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:48 AM
0

In my opinion you sound like a troll trying to make Men's Rights look bad: Images of the suffragettes reveal that early feminists looked much like their third wave modern variety – plain or downright ugly. Feminism is the political process of transferring sexual power from the young and beautiful to the old and ugly (female). It makes really no sense to you to compare images of everyday women to the most beautiful women of the time (Mary Pickford, Louise Brooks.) Ms. Pickford was famously marrie…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:26 PM
3

This is such a great drawing. You should also join feMRA and ladyMRAs
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:40 PM
2

Hello, I too am a law student (2L next month) and there are a number of situations in which someone is essentially wasting money by hiring an attorney. That is not to say that custody matters are such a scenario, but advising people "always lawyer up" is a bit wrongheaded. "Never talk to a police officer or law enforcement, not a single word, without contacting an attorney," is better. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:27 PM
2

1) Why on earth would they post her derogatory, insulting nickname in that article. It has nothing to do with the murder. 2) I would be lying if I said this hasn't crossed my mind before. 3) Okay I am mostly kidding about #2 but I do really like beer. 4) Seriously, WTF.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:21 PM
2

I would talk to him but put it more like, "I'm worried about you and the fact that you are in a controlling relationship." Beyond that, however, it really isn't your business, if he decides not to hear it.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 07:04 PM
2

I don't blame her for wanting to miss out on the polka music. :)
/r/MensRights30/07/12 04:59 PM
5

Not all women are overly controlling. Of course not. I said pretty much the same thing to my partner when he went to Maryland Deathfest with his best friend and not me. It is really important to have separate activities and interests from your spouse, boyfriend, girlfriend, whatever. I spend one evening a week cramped in a room with 4 guys that aren't him. No problems so far.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 04:54 PM
11

FYI, this magazine is a tabloid in the UK. It is doutful the submissions in it are even true.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 04:12 PM
1

I agree with other posters - it is not ideal for either of you to leave the country, especially for so long. I would also advise against you going abroad, leaving your son behind, as it will be harder to pick up custody again when you return. There are just some things that, when it comes to parenthood, you have to say "that ship has sailed." Teaching abroad is probably going to be one of them. Perhaps you could do teach for america instead.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 03:11 PM
9

I think it shows major insecurity if a man/woman will not "let" their partner get together for a "just the guys/gals" night, weekend, whatever, every once in a while. Big red flag.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 03:04 PM
1

I am glad I'm not the only one.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 11:43 AM
1

Could it have been because they were having a makeout session rather than sex? I would not think incest applied to lip on lip action.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 01:14 AM
5

Troll.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 04:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter