TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VexerVexed Archive

View 6 posts and 349 comments by VexerVexed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Child abuse is triggering so you'll refuse to look into the factual reality of the historical obstruction of the study of and arrest of female sexual abusers? You're so traumatized you prefer perpetuating the sexual abuse of boys (and girls)? You people are all the same, I've actually done the reading into sexual abuse by clergy and the amount of sexual abuse perpetuated by nuns that's never been prosecuted/is credible is staggering; of the organizations that have worked tirelessly for the littl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 01:48 AM
2

You replied under my comment and so I was notified. I just feel the need to reply to you; since you're an unserious person polluting this thread. In case anyone stumbles across your comment and thinks the sentiment of someone who doesn't actually engage with arguments they initiate, is worth a dime. It is a typical Amber advocate tactic though. To throw a rock and then ad-hom about the weirdness of receiving a reply/rebuttal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 08:10 PM
2

But you can't even acknowledge sourced rebuttals, keep only replying to comments amenable towards your closed mind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 07:40 PM
3

You've been reported. Edit: I always engage with Amber supporters who approach in good faith, rare as you are; and in the copius arguments across my post history, I have a rebuttal for any argument you could've made, had you not approached me with thought terminating sentences (repeatedly, on a few minutes turnaround time, so it's impossible you could've touched what was sourced) and a reply that, honest to God, was the worst-faith/most disgustingly assumptive reply I've had to a comment of mine…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 12:59 PM
2

No; it's because this subreddit has rules around good faith engagement, a lot of what I've said "hasn't been debunked," online and you're almost certainly a troll. This sub should be more rigorous around modding against "red pill," rhetoric and conservative sympathetic posting (in my opinion) just as more users should be swift in identifying bad faith posters instead of humoring them, given I've had back and forth's with your ilk for four years at this point; I'd rather not have to deal with an …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 12:31 PM
3

Brother, can you add 1 + 1. I'll give you one more opportunity to act in good faith. I noted a miniscule amount of money, directed towards a limited sphere insofar as social media is concerned, relative to the channels for information proliferation and demographics of those who viewed and held opinions on the case. The article doesn't even claim that Depp's PR is being funded by Ben Shapiro; it claims that Ben Shapiro funded independent adds, centered around the case. interlocuting that my comme…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 12:24 PM
2

I would respond to this comment comprehensively, but it's assumptive and projective to a disgusting degree; almost worthy of being modded against. I don't believe you're capable of being a good faith actor based on this reply, and I doubt you've read the "UK Documents." As someone who's actually knowledgeable though, here ya go. https://www.reddit.com/r/PsycheOrSike/s/7Sm8li4i7a I doubt you have any actual knowledge of Amber's life given she's similarly abusive of substances, actually has a dome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 12:14 PM
2

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/amber-heard-twitter-support-is-largely-from-fake-and-inauthentic-accounts/P75JWWVKQG3QDWXO5GXPTIFQTA/ Christina Taft who was barred from the VA trial due to her unhinged behavior, discussing the purchase of bots; yet, she who was amongst pro-Amber twitter trolls was apart of the creation of the "Who Trolled Amber Heard?" podcast. https://xcancel.com/MJ_Tsuki/status/1794973269042323558?t=jRedciCt-D1_8sOwta6cYA&s=19 Blatantly bottled tweets: https://x.com/c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 11:59 AM
2

That's all reasonable. If someone is repeatedly falling for the women they know then there's an issue at hand. I thought the below was part of my original reply, but I'd left it in my notes apparently: "What's contradictory about it? And why are we saying "makes you-" as if describing the development of a crush is inherently accusatory? The majority of conversations about the "friend and fuckzone-" are going to be based on experiences in youth that straggle into the 20's and in the infantile wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 10:38 PM
2

I think it's 100% understandable that emotionally developing/immature men won't understand the extent of control they have over whom they attach to emotionally, and when they're younger and feel thing's stronger; lack the ability to regulate feelings to the strongest extent. I'm 28 and didn't have that awareness/capability until my mid-20's. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1pp6w5q/men_who_ask_out_a_female_friend_9_out_of_10_times/nuky7no/ My take is here on the OPs claim. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 10:12 PM
7

You're shadowboxing. Nothing about the scenario infers a cycle repeated to an inappropriate amount of times.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 09:34 PM
3

That doesn't disprove the OPs claimn
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 09:32 PM
4

Yep. If I have ten female friends and have an infatuation for five of them that dissipates to platonic feelings, then we're able to remain friends. Now let's say I have a friend and two years into the friendship it strikes that "Holy shit- I have a crush!" That could be worked through to a platonic place; but having been in that scenario, at that point there's stress as to hurting the friendship/the possibility of interacting holding too much pain. Which isn't necessarily a sign of immaturity as…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 09:32 PM
2

Not really. Keep supporting the physical and sexual abuse of boys and men; do what makes you proud.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/25 08:32 PM
5

Coward. Had to use a throwaway?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 06:02 PM
15

Lancel Lannister's abuse by Cersei is handled very well in ASOIAF. Even when Tyrion's knocking him down a cascade of pegs on ACOK, the book acknowledges Lancel's youth/ignorance, and by the end he's challenging her/showing bravery. Then his father in Feast basically just calls out there incestuous abuse/that with the age difference Cersie is more of an aunt than a cousin, she had a parental role and abused it to make Lancel do her bidding. Then in Feast he's torn up inside/has trauma and this is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/25 10:04 AM
2

I just mean relative to the community of those that talk about this case years later/deal with Amber advocates specifically. I'm generally apart from in terms of the approach I believe we should take on certain matters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/25 01:06 AM
10

Videos with hundreds of thousands of views. FD Signifier, Lindsay Ellis, Alice Capelle, Rebecca Watson, Olay Olurin, and many more beyond. Medusone's propaganda pieces are pretty big. Tweets from people like Contrapoints circa the trial, another proud trial avoider simply projecting their preferred script onto it. Most mainstream media publications, etc. I've seen Amber support become the dominant narrative in the trials wake on a number of traditional forums too as the quiet gives those who wan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/25 09:35 PM
6

Look. I've tried to convince people in the Depp V Heard trial subreddit to make a master post compiling the best arguments against common Amber advocate talking points and showing their consistently unhinged and organized behavior, but they don't want to unduly influence people so they stay arguing against the regular/occasional Amber supporters that generally behave like trolls who come in. Rather than do anything useful. "My frustration is that prior to the trial I told people this was going t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/25 12:32 AM
25

A lot of her supporters either lie about listening to them or refer to them out of trust for those in their ideological bubble who've told them that they show "the truth." For example how many times have you heard an Amber supporter claim Depp's audio was edited? But as I've broken down here: "Let's be clear, this is by far the worst frequent point of Amber advocates as only Heard is known to have submitted butchered audio to the courts and her team is shown to have attempted trickery in invalid…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 11:52 PM
11

I appreciate it. It's near impossible to find good faith engagement on this case from Amber Heard supporters, so it's a relief to have someone actually read a comment of mine. My other comment with the medium piece regarding the "unsealed documents" and with the Depp V Heard trial subreddit link is just a toe dip into the insane nature of this case's online meta. (Not my first reply to you, my reply to another person in this thread.) It's not an understatement when I say that for three years str…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 11:38 PM
7

I know. It's just that Depp has other texts with extreme language and he didn't challenge their authenticity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 11:01 PM
10

I try and avoid those conspiratorial claims when discussing the case. The only one that I find sus is the Stephen Deuters text that couldn't be authenticated/had other weird quirks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 10:52 PM
13

Nah that's a real text. Here's a past comment of mine addressing it: "Question; do you judge all victims in the world who've expressed likely non-literal/genuine desires to hurt their assailants with assault via a foreign object? If I know a rape victim who's talked about sticking a broom handle up their assailants ass; aka rape and not simply wishing prison rape, but gross expressions of personally committed violence, should I start equating them with their assaulter? I mean talk of severing pe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 10:41 PM
23

You should see the trash published across Google Scholars on the social media/sociological meta of the case. All garbage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 10:38 PM
38

https://xcancel.com/ellesarie/status/1984286773560868912?s=20 And above I've linked the verbal abuse Heard had slung at Depp that exact same day relentlessly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:58 PM
16

Doordash girl is Brick Lady (Rhoda Osman) electric boogaloo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:51 PM
14

I've looked through their post history; this person believes Depp reacted disproportionately to Heard nearly taking his life via physical abuse and the suicide baiting that's intrinsic to false accusations. Even though they believe Heard did the greater harm during the relationship. Which for one isn't the case as Heard suffered so greatly due to the weight of her sins; a "witch hunt" isn't necessary when the whole of the media is defending your abuser and thus creating proportional backlash to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:49 PM
28

/u/no-cat-2957 All of this is fine because Depp is wealthy right? You can't feel sympathy for someone whose ex partner literally could have had an attempted murder charge via finger severance? "That's just not true. Here's an article from a journalist who's published/edited at publications from The Atlantic to Newsweek discussing the failings of her colleagues in coverage. https://archive.is/7ly2e Here's Heard supporter HQ(s) backing that up: Fauxmoi and Deppdelusion being famous for their staun…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:44 PM
13

Rather than thoughts on it, here's an old comment of mine explaining the "perspective shift" to someone. It's the result of a mass media and reddit disinfo campaign that continues till today: Here's the answer I gave elsewhere: "Answer: Go over to Deppdelusion/Google and Depp/Heard and see with what fervency journalist and activists have been re-litigating the case. There hasn't been any mass reconsideration of the case/switch in perspectives due to bots being de-issued. Prominent Amber supporte…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:31 PM
19

What does this even mean? "Quietly won the case?' ?????
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:26 PM
16

Honestly this is disgusting. The sole case of a potential male domestic violence victim to reach such public prominence, someone who had the weight of the IPV advocacy industry, the ACLU, the NCADV, mainstream media and more against him; and you can't bring yourself to care about it. This is the difference. Feminists had a whole decade of advocacy for the average victim (women) in part predicated on the testimonies of women of same and wealth as the platform they sprung from, and they treated De…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:25 PM
34

Did your recollection entail actually watching the trial?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:10 PM
1

Wow congratulations this might be the worst reply I've ever received from an actual person, also it's evidence of your closed mind. Congrats; I'm embarrassed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 07:48 AM
1

You're recommending Bell "Never apologize for falsely accusing the central park five" Hooks? Bell the Babbler? In all her non-empirical pontificating about black men? I recommend Dr.Tommy J Curry, someone with an actual fact based understanding of black male existence whose work isn't used like a cudgel over the heads of men. Not the black feminists that walk in Hooks stead; that lie about the rates of black boys suffering and their primary sexual abusers, or who like Kimberle Crenshaw protested…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 05:10 AM
4

? My comment was downvoted, but I'm just saying whenever I've read about sexual violence as perpetrated against boy's in Africa; so a handful of articles, studies, and testimonies in large twitter threads, it seems more common on the continent to a degree I'd think is comparative to sexual violence perpetrated against girls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 06:00 PM
15

He had some conflict with the moderators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 05:01 PM
4

Whenever I read about sexual violence against boy's in Africa as perpetrated by women, I get the impression it's comparative. Stories of house help or other girls in schools, family etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:26 PM
3

(Kinda ranty as I am up in the am and kinda wired) See, unlike most people; I actually try and be informed on the takes I have on anyone or I say nothing at all. I've watched enough Destiny and seen him comment on topics the other people listed have been abysmal on, to know he's not akin to them. I know for a fact, because I watched it all, that when he's been out of depth on men's issues he's hosted people for days/weeks who could do what he couldn't, versus just platforming a woman to spread a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/25 11:18 AM
6

Saying Destiny loses all commons sense when having to earnestly engage with male issues is accurate, unlike the claims he's akin to other male feminists/an algorithm chaser. He spergs out and makes statements that show the fecklessness of his entire "red pill arc."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 08:24 PM
18

Amber Heard supporter Contrapoints? Contrapoints who considers her period of empathy for men as her "pick me phase" Contrapoints? That Natalie? She's a standard, uninquisitive feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 06:12 PM
6

Doubtful no Destiny only caring about the algo, people say that as if he doesn't do everything in his power to cull his audience again and again; not even just pertaining to controversies; he has never prioritized riding the algorithm in his career. Destiny out of all of these people is by far the closest to being able to have solid takes on men's issues, and when he's lacked in the past he at least hosted people like his ex-mod 4thot to combat divestors anti-black male rhetoric, given his own l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 06:00 PM
5

Here's a crash course on that, with clips/quotes of Hook herself. https://x.com/tristang300/status/1757916013340082488?t=z8gstxt7wW7E3t65l_MgoA&s=19 https://x.com/drhoodscholar/status/1757924279570829660?t=3eh4stXU0YTfWIkM_gnoqA&s=19
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 04:51 AM
0

I don't care about whatever double standards you're moralizing around, I'm just boggled by this community choosing to be obstinate around the most politically poisonous position possible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 04:59 PM
0

I'm not telling you to give up; I'm telling you that if you support financial abortions as a core tenant you're picking your own poison. Be my guest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 04:58 PM
12

You do realize that TERFs and non-TERF feminists hold a lot of the same insane positions on anything male? Right? Most of the feminists I see spreading falsehoods about male victimization, spewing bile at young men, supporting female abusers, etc. aren't TERFs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 04:24 PM
7

She's been found guilty just today. https://xcancel.com/celebriD/status/1983684478758171043?t=lMR9qZoVwLZYpmqGUdDrMQ&s=19 The 10 years social media ban is wild. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 05:32 AM
-1

Which part of the population is particularly sympathetic to the thought of abandoning children, theoretically? Conservatives, feminist skeptical left-leaning men? Which politicians could conceivably even ponder such a position and not be laughed off the public stage? I've yet to see a community or individual actor on social media that's ultimately hinged, who supports "financial abortions," all I know is that people of all stripes are turned off by even the thought of it. I see a whole nother wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 01:04 AM
0

You can stand steadfast in political ineffectiveness. Financial abortions are a suicidal position, people here being unable to see that has convinced me this community is cooked as of the last month.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 12:31 AM
1

My point is simple. You have no platform to leverage, no political power/sway; I think it makes sense to be as obstinate and off putting around say, circumcision as an issue (aside from telling those unbothered by their circumcision who may from a point of reason be anti circumcision/be swayable to being so while lacking the emotion those traumatized hold, like myself, that they were mutilated aggressively which will just turn people away on an individual level); I think that's winnable. I think…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 04:54 AM
2

The problem is a lot of this community is over being conciliatory and so they want to stand on whatever position as resolutely as they can; but they don't take into account that we have no leverage/bargaining power and some positions this community seems to hold are repellent to all identities/sides of the political spectrum (say, financial abortions). This community by and large talks about Richard Reeves as if he's satan, it isn't interested in a makeover or playing politics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 11:03 PM
54

What did you expect? One of the issues here is that older men are essentially cemented in an outlook that's hard to connect to men's current material and emotional reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 09:10 AM
3

Oh. I don't believe in cringe rhetoric that is bad electorally, sorry if that offends you; there's a mixture of people on the subreddit, some would be more your speed; you must have seen that opinion spread before. I also find it valuable to not paint everybody who find themself apart from the "left" (from my US centric perspective) as on the right lest that push them further away;
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/25 02:56 PM
6

Not right wing, just insane and regressive on some topics/needlessly sane washing of the right. But overall politically her stated positions are mostly Dem aligning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 04:34 PM
7

Destiny isn't a leftist, he learns left politically and identifies as a liberal. But yes, Hasan is insanely hypocritical; and sure, Ana isn't the best person to speak on male issue (and I've heavily disliked her for the last however many years) but she's human and will have some inconsistencies. She's consistently been better than most on male sexual victimization, at least as children specifically; I'd go watch her commentary in TYT's video on the Baby Scumbag controversy, and we've all seen th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 04:33 PM
1

They're ridiculous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 02:32 PM
-1

Go ahead. I probably make the point about allyship relative to black male studies, and the fecklessness of this community when pitching fights from our non-existent platform, better here. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/9PSdWTMoeI Turn people off; men won't won't to seemingly "abandon children," conservatives will think you're escaping accountability, women will be repelled, the posting in this thread will be used to paint this community badly and they wouldn't be posted that ne…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 02:31 PM
-2

I'll tell you the same thing I think of and have tweeted to the black male studies academics that do better critiques of feminism than essentially the entirety of this subreddit; how I tell them their hyperfocus on black men and boys at points excludes necessary allies in white men as they see themselves as apart from normal liberal politics and have a picture of what being pro-black means-, that's abnormal relative to the general black population (certainly relative to those I've known across m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 04:51 AM
-11

This thread is optics poison, bad politics, and not something even the majority of men sympathetic towards or involved in what they'd consider male advocacy would be agreeable towards. No, support the right to choose for women implicitly; and know that you have no leverage, this thread is just a tantrum. Abortion rights are popular overall, regardless of the regressive state of the Republican party; do you think male advocates are a big enough block for that ultimatum to be persuadable? This thr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 05:18 PM
16

I'm mainly confused as to how Taylor Lorenz squares away her Hasan endorsement/pushing with her pro-Amber Heard propagandizing; given his insults towards and doubling down against her nets him much and more criticism from parts of the feminist left, he's the odd commentator out on that. And even then he eventually had to equivocate between her and her victim/insult him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 07:44 PM
4

Contact https://x.com/TitleIXforAll?t=d9YJCnC2famh0VRYbY-xuw&s=09 /u/Title_IX_For_All)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 10:25 PM
15

It might be worth looking into the criticism of Bell Hooks/advent of black male studies, as despite most of their academics being farther left than me to the point of some incompatibility, it speaks to my lived experience more and has the best historically/empirically grounded critiques of feminist literature and how it deigns to speak for those they've never been, whilst gatekeeping them from studying their own existence. The quickest of dives could inform the polishing you're currently doing. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 09:50 PM
6

Is this something that's going to be shared with that student?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 09:39 PM
1

I have to assune it's the shorturl; I'll fix it in the morning. Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 08:48 AM
5

Taking a lower paying job due to obligations to one's own family, is financially motivated. HEAL fields often have a higher barrier of entry, and like I said, it's both. I was talking weeks ago about the statistical drop in men working in daycare post-satinic panic. I.e "-Such as the assumption that male disgust for the feminine is what keeps men from caring positions. https://phys.org/news/2023-01-men-occupations-women.html Meanwhile in reality men fled jobs like daycare after false accusations…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 07:27 PM
2

It's social perception and financial incentives/obligations, at least historically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 10:26 AM
15

People here criticize Reeves all the time; I'm one of his only defenders in this subreddit. Everytime he's brought up it's mostly criticism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 10:21 AM
-8

People like you who try to bargain from a place of zero leverage are why men's advocacy is doomed. If you can't work with Richard Reeves then you're just cooked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/25 12:26 AM
4

Because menslib is the sort of community that will allow discussion about the broader Metoo movement, which was largely propelled by the testimonies of women of fame and wealth; whilst deleting all discussion of Depp V Heard or how that zeitgeist peak, affected men's mental health/influenced outreach to abuse support services. Why? Because it offends the popular feminist status quo, that's based entirely on disinfo and flawed ideology, framing the case as a gateway to rightwing thought and the p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 07:18 PM
10

This post isn't overly long or incomprehensible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/25 07:47 PM
11

Why wouldn't he be the person posted when he's "the* archetypical and main promoted cishet misandrist apologist man?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/25 07:46 PM
–

You sound like a sick person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 02:21 PM
0

1) Cool. Still doesn't change that it's a reductionist way to frame the reasons why men aren't in the mental health field at the same rates, maybe people in positions of authority should have sought more of a balance when they sought to correct for the historically male makeup of the field. The point wasn't the accusatory sentences, it was the argument around it. https://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/gender-composition Maybe you should be the solution by not jumping to the most belittling/your e…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 09:52 PM
1

Thinking mental health care is "girly" is just the assumptive, reductionist, explanation for the differences in decisions people make career wise and for the decline in men taking caring jobs I'm recent decades. Just like I said to the male mental health worker above. "Speaking of your field though: Question? Do you think men flee the social services/caring fields due to a revulsion at fields becoming feminized in the same ways people theorize around hobbies, having similar demographic shifts? O…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 08:38 PM
–

Reminder that misandry/gender hostility leads to child abuse (Physical abuse of boys by mother's) and is a predictor of likelihood to sexually coerce men. https://imgur.com/a/qiJxlvq Not to mention all the ways in which misandry in various institutions railroads marginalized men and boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:52 PM
–

Lmao. "The Venn diagram of guys saying Sabrina Carpenter should take accountability for her 5’8” and famously funny-looking ex boyfriend cheating on her and publicly humiliating." Who was doing this? Men mostly lauded Sabrina and the only people getting at her for her choice in partner were either annoying "milk men," aka black men who want white women, hyper-focusing on her dating Barry as opposite of her sexualization of black men with her "BBC" ad-libbing, dancers, and so-on. Or other women w…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:38 PM
4

1) "And you mention “the left” - as if “the right” have anything to offer men but post-hoc justification for their shitty behaviour and refusal to do anything to help themselves that might challenge their self-conception in any way." Funny, if you search my post history you won't see a single comment focusing on appealing to right-wing men/equivocating between the right and the left, actually you'll see anger at men that seek to do so/strong endorsement of "voting blue," down ballot/a gradual cr…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:30 AM
5

Goomba fallacy. Those are almost never the same people, the people I know who discuss these issues the most and or have studied them for a living/passionately, are the one's I see who get accused of doing so to "derail" talk of women's issues the most, from people who've either also never spoken about men's mental health on their pages or more importantly, have been adversarial to it. Also despite people on the left knowing the weight words hold they seem to believe men exist in a vacuum where t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:52 AM
14

I think that's wrong. He's professing his true terrible beliefs and it's important to acknowledge his actions as genuine to effectively argue against them. But yah I posted the initial thread on his apology to either the Deppdelusion sub or faux moi here and then the thread when he dropped the video he promised in that apology. Very pathetic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 02:12 PM
6

I'm pretty active on black male studies twitter despite not being as far left as a lot of the users. I've thought about making a post here on the wealth of knowledge certain accounts have/a thread I helped create, and have mentioned Dr.TJC a few times in this sub; though now he mainly posts on Bluesky That said, the twitter isn't one to one with the scholarship and some of the informative users have rhetoric that I take issues with and could be isolatory towards white people looking for knowledg…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 08:18 AM
5

See: https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1g3lngp/fd_signifer_makes_a_28_minute_video_attacking/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 05:23 PM
3

The saying "not all men but always a man" is just abuse and experience erasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 07:39 PM
27

Well, there's a narrative in recent years that men and boys with autism and ADHD are allotted more concern and opportunities/face less societal harm than women with ADHD, rather than people empathetically approaching the nuanced ways in which neuro-divergence effects/manifests within all people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 10:53 PM
2

My hope has been that Trump is so terrible that it bypasses the wider left's inability to right their missteps with men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/25 04:01 PM
2

Why am I or men as a collective to blame for the system/socialization you and other women and girls are party to yet escape all accountability for? Aren't plenty of men left-wing as well? Women are single handedly pushing progressive politics? Why am I grouped in with whatever strawman you're battling? Do you not see how asinine it is to put all onus on men as you are, following an election wherein a misogynist fascist was partly propelled by women? Women aren't uniform in thoughts and actions. …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 06:49 PM
33

Emma is an Amber Heard supporter, Sam Seder platforms people like her and is too old and secure in himself to understand the plight of younger men or branch out into male issues intellectually. Not that being secure in oneself is antithetical to understanding such struggles or any sort of activism, but that some men who are doing well in all areas in life are the examples used to invalidate male grievances by themselves and other's. Sam is in that wheelhouse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/25 02:23 AM
2

I'm not concerned with this sub being any particular top limiting flavor of liberal or leftist, my ideal community is just about anything other than right-leaning and redpill tolerating- that's expressly in opposition to the Republican party without fanciful 3rd party dreaming (U.S centric framing)- I want this to be a space that offers a home for men at risk of disaffecting from the political process/the democratcs and feeling politically homeless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/25 09:37 PM
1

Yet the most credible research on the matter of understanding male victimhood/the only replication study on societal perforation of it, and a solid replication study is about how close you'll get to fact in the social sciences; shows women as sharing the same misconceptions about male sexuality that lead to female perpetrated assault and the downplaying of one's own behavior. https://www.scribd.com/document/643382625/Judgments-About-Male-Victims-of-Sexual-Assault-by-Women-a-35-Year-Replication-S…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:21 PM
1

Proudly emotional. Why are you okay swallowing the spit from journalists that sourced suicide baiting, abusive, underage whilst presenting as "experts" on DV, twitter users words on the documents that have since proliferated through Deppdelusion and the wider web belong- while not being okay to read well sourced words from another person who was actually involved in that online meta you think you have license to speak on at all? Why are you unwilling to compare the actual documents to how those …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:03 PM
1

Based on their reply to my comment, they're beyond saving.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 08:53 PM
1

So instead you'll support the publications that literally sourced anonymous twitter users, including minors, whilst lecturing people about her evils of anyone who actually engaged with the trial itself and content creators covering it? Suicide baiting, racist adjacent twitter users that the likes of the journalist that organized the famous open letter on Amber's behalf- promoted before quietly distancing from when their sights turned on a victim they actually new personally. Legitimately, you're…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 08:52 PM
1

Prefacing this by noting that you painting those that drove the transcribing of the never actually sealed documents as "fanboys" is nonsensical when it was a funding drive based on twitter, largely funded and driven by women. The idea that Depp's strongest advocates were MRA's is comical when if you go to any MRA space online and check the records- you'll see that there was no large grassroots organizing for him in any of those spaces, which is actually sad in my book. Anyways: The unsealed docu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 07:08 PM
2

3rd parties are the opposite of pragmatic. I disagree completely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/25 06:50 PM
17

Nah. They've been so been doubling down on the beliefs that underlie it hence the video essayists sphere obsession with defending Amber Heard. Or their nonsense around that lady who accused a Haitian man of beating her with a brick which when found out for the obvious fraud people had pointed out since the beginning, they just tried to find fault with anyone who countered her story and did zero introspection on the threat of false accusations to men in any retrospectives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/25 01:49 AM
13

This is a left wing community buddy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 10:53 PM
16

There's too many zero sum thinkers in this subreddit who think their strong stance means anything when male advocates don't have a platform to begin with
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/25 03:33 AM
-1

The choosing beggars in this subreddit would rather cry about Richard Reeves and change nothing when people are even less palatable to the stances here than his milquetoast one's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 03:07 AM
3

Men are more likely to be raped by women than by men and the #1 tactic of female abusers is the act or threat of a false allegation
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 01:31 AM
5

And I was raised with that by the women that feminists tactically deny/downplay the existence of in the way they perform half-baked societal analysis and criticize any male expression of their lived experience, that doesn't conform to orthodoxy. Also next to the female peers that now are able to talk about toxic masculinity and whatever else as if they weren't right alongside any boy behaving in ways that promote said beliefs/ways of male behavior currently seen by said women as unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 09:02 PM
2

-Black boys have the youngest sexual debut of any demographic in the country and I just said that female juvenile detention staff disproportionately, meaning relative to the amount of men on staff, sexually abuse boys and the excuse you conjure is proximity to men? Despite the proximity in the second example outstripping that of men? -Lol corrective rape of gay men is not primarily perpetrated by men my individual. -Actually so true girlie I need pussi and so I'm arguing with you here for pussi …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 06:42 PM
1

And then just like when Obama tried to target help towards boys of color, feminists will come in and attack it and never acknowledge all of the false stats, flawed analysis, and repressive approaches they take to all things involving men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 06:19 PM
4

Broad stats in male and female perspectives on male sexuality and studies on corrective rape of boys are isolated situations say what???? I never even talk about dating what???? No point in getting stats because you seem incapable of critical thought and reading; but the primary sexual abusers of black boys are older women and girls and black boys have the youngest sexual debut of any demographic in the nation, and in juvenile detention centers female staff disproportionately sexually abuse boys…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 06:14 PM
5

The way feminists speak of false accusations is in a way that specifically invalidates and erases make victimhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:55 PM
9

No, you can't. Plenty of subs will simply ban you if you've participated in a no-no group or you source unequivocally factual wrongdoings of a woman like Amber Heard, to counter the extensive abuse apology occurring for her amongst other erasure of male suffering, in the majority of feminist communities on this site. I.e Gamerghazi where support of her is enshrined in the rules or some of the non-expressly political/pop entertainment subs where you'll get warnings for non-inflammatory posts not …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:54 PM
6

Given you downplayed the physical abuse of boys as perpetrated by women in account of proximity, why do you hate boys and men so much you won't contribute towards a cultural conversation to process the role of women as abusive authoritarians in many males lives? I'm saying often because your initial anecdote wasn't anything worth a substantive reply. But: https://www.scribd.com/document/643382625/Judgments-About-Male-Victims-of-Sexual-Assault-by-Women-a-35-Year-Replication-Study https://imgur.co…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:47 PM
17

No. It's basically a dogwhistle for gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:21 PM
5

Not really. This sub is pretty much the only place on this site where active debate around critiques of feminism can occur; it'd be better to just bottle up their feelings/thoughts rather than address feminism which is an incredibly dominant force culturally and institutionally?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:20 PM
6

Women are often homophobic and enforce their homophobia onto boys via physical abuse, rape, or the commissioning out of violence to the men in their family. Your rhetoric is disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:16 PM
7

Women are some of the largest enforcers of heteronormativity through corporal punishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:13 PM
2

Women do it or did it just as much and discussing the issue as if it's just men hurting men, just leads to more men aggrieved with the feminist approach to solving this issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:11 PM
5

False accusations are inherent to abuse; downplaying false allegations is the active erasure of male victimhood (sexually and physically) Edit: And feminist rhetoric around proven false allegations such as Rhoda the lady who claimed to have been beaten by a black man with a brick whilst other black men stood around not helping her, is actively toxic. Toxic in expectations put onto men and insults thrown at them, with no analysis after the fact on the expectations put on male bodies as protectors…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 05:01 PM
1

You say this as if men aren't speaking out against said stereotypes and as if one-half of society can be overruled by an impossible to achieve, consensus from men on ceasing to stop being dumbasses around all matters of sex. Your phrasing puts more onus/fault on boys who were raised by women who believe the worst of men, even if said boys never actually adhered to the toxic norms that were forced upon them; and then they can't even express grievances without being hit/hurt by clunky rhetoric suc…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:59 PM
8

True! And women and girls do all of the above and many who are currently feminist were able to skate under the umbrella of feminism as they age out of said traits without being held to account for their behavior in the ways men are, simply for being male. 1) https://imgur.com/a/SwV4gb4 The rhetoric we're met with is as if perpetration of the norms that hurt men is unidirectional and something we must shoulder in spite of any lip service of "women enforcing the patriarchy as well." Yet the most c…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:56 PM
5

The issue is with male grievances around unrequited affection being spoken of as a uniquely male feeling- which isn't entirely the case, and the fact that in places like the thread I linked; is done with a blatant lack of ability to put oneself in another's shoes, from those that believe they're vested with more emotional intelligence then their commentary actually conveys. They don't recognize male emotional depth/range.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:48 PM
0

I mean....it's not as if lesbians don't ever talk of their crushing in ways reminiscent of what people condemn in men. Take talk of the "friendzone" for example; have you ever read the woes of lesbians crushing on their straight friends? How do you see male unrequited pining cast in contrast? Well as a man who always mocked the concept of the friendzone, the belittling of the pain caused by continued contact with the "friendzoner," is an example of the prioritization of one-half of the human exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:18 PM
12

Why does he need to talk about the subset of men already extensively laid into and or conflated with men who have genuine concern for male emotion/suffering by the aforementioned feminists, in order to invalidate them and their points? Does people need to qualify/contextualize all talk of feminists with the ills of dumb and malicious men?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:53 PM
4

I got it to admit to the media having a clear and extreme bias towards Amber Heard once.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/24 08:32 PM
5

Not a fan of trumpists
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/24 01:19 AM
2

She supports Amber Heard and has the asinine sociological analysis of the online response to the trial, that all uninformed/overly biased feminists share.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 08:31 PM
7

Kinda crazy sentiment do ppl think long posts are just a recent thing? Is it memory loss?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 09:32 PM
6

Attempt at invalidating your experience by saying we should discourage the sort of replies that will isolate our minority movement even further? You're welcome; nothing about your experience is invalidated by stating we should discourage rhetoric that rejects those potentially coming in good faith. You're outta this world if you think people are rejecting feminism on the left in the way that you express to where you can just dismiss them as a cult and carry on to anything that will bring tangibl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 08:22 AM
1

Yah those sorta reactions should be discouraged We don't have the luxury to reject ppl here like that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 07:41 AM
8

I think that's fine of you to admit as we all have biases based on our individual experiences/exposure to ideas and behaviors. Please don't be dissuaded from continuing to talk here based on the resistance/anger many of us will have, seek to understand it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 07:23 AM
13

Also here's something to sit with that couldn't fit above. -Black boys have the youngest sexual debut of any demographic in the U.S and our primary abusers are black women- https://www.academia.edu/70509328/He_Didnt_Want_Any_of_That_Considerations_in_the_Study_and_Theorization_of_Black_Boys_Sexual_Victimization_in_the_United_States Feminist framing of this issue actively blocks us from receiving the help and understanding we need despite the claims that it's feminists who truly make a space for …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 07:19 AM
14

I'll address your post through an on the face "silly" lens that I believe gets across the irreconcilable differences between male advocacy/advocates and the current culture of the left/feminist spaces on this website and in independent media. I spent most of my life (i.e from the moment I could even conceive of gender issues and form a political thought; contrary to the false narrative of anyone with critiques of feminism having done so through a diet of right-wing media and a past of covert gam…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 07:18 AM
3

Then you should read the critiques of her from black academics that actually use empiricisms vs poetics and see how her work is used stifle men and spread abject falsehoods as to black male masculinity/existence. And alongside that if only she'd apologized for claiming the central park five were enacting ritualistic appeals to white male patriarchal aspirations, through the assaults she took for granted, rather than republishing the book those quotations are in with no corrections whatsoever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/24 07:28 AM
1

Ayyyyyy I've been wondering where you went to
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/24 10:45 PM
2

Buddy you're mistaken if you think it was terfs alone that supported Amber Heard. It was women like the Stanford Professor that brought the Brock Turner case the national attention it saw. It was the non-terf lead tech/Internet culture reporters at the NYtimes and NBC Kat Tenbarge (the most influential reporter around this case) and Taylor Lorenz of libs of TikTok fame. It was Michael Hobbes for NPR and NPR's general reporting as well as media outlets from Vice to Teen Vogue to the Rolling Stone…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 05:08 PM
1

There's likely (and correctly) to be zero compromise if the source of such a campaign is from a Trump supporter like Bettina is. Those communities are already zero sum so why would they even cosign a petition that many sympathetic to male issues would also find questionable?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/24 03:33 PM
4

Black boys have the youngest sexual debut of any demographic and our primary abusers are black women and girls despite all insistence otherwise. Female staff in juvenile detention centers are consistently found to disproportionately sexually abuse boys. Mother's abuse children more. When the Duluth Model was developed black men suffered the highest rates of IPH in the nation. Why do you feel so confident stating the rates of what men and boys suffer when you don't know the currently existing sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 02:34 AM
8

I legitimately doubt that most men would support financial abortions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/24 05:54 PM
18

Sexual and physical abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/24 09:06 PM
–

You have a staggering ability to misunderstand and show bad faith towards any given comment. Its truly impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 02:19 AM
1

"The outcome of the trial-" isn't what you deemed it to be. I'm sorry that you can't comprehend the concept of "legal inaccuracies," and think me stating you've swallowed disinfo from those that discuss the trial you know nothing about, is a comment on disagreement with it's verdict. It's verdict is actually irrelevant to me; as it is to anyone not looking to equivocate on the case or stump for a particular side. And you're beyond reason because of who you are, not about anything particular to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 10:40 PM
0

What's my worldview buddy? My worldview is irrelevant towards the facts of the cases- and oh it's you, you're beyond reason. Nevermind.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 09:14 PM
3

It isn't proven that Depp abused Heard; you've just been fed nonsense about the UK Trial v The Sun.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 08:57 PM
2

Is it "cherry picking" to note the coiner of intersectionality Kimberle Crenshaw and black female lawmakers impeding Obama's efforts to specifically assist underprivileged boys of color on the grounds of it not including black girls; despite black girls and women already recieving more governmental and charitable support and seeing better outcomes than black boys and men in ways that can be born out empirically? Despite them already being under the umbrella of Obama's initiative for such girls c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 03:38 AM
3

Women don't exist in a vacuum my person; female identity isn't founded on the absence of men
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 03:34 AM
2

Men think feminists should advocate for men as it's reciprocal for whatever help they recieve from men; unless you believe the story of feminism is a unidirectional homogeneous push against power rather than a complex movement of allyship amongst identity groups. Which isn't the case for most subjugated group in modern history. Also as I state in another reply; "Sometime in the 2010's the more academic phrasing that "feminism is about female/woman's liberation," proliferated to where it'd be see…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 03:30 AM
10

Sometime in the 2010's the more academic phrasing that "feminism is about female/woman's liberation," proliferated to where it'd be seen outside of specific avrivist/academic environments. I was taught "the equality" defintion and of feminism as being "for men to," when younger and I believe that many men who are now disillusioned with the movement were taught the same and now feel as though there's a promise reneged on when told to "make their own movement, like women did," or that actually fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 03:21 AM
2

I hope you tell that to each and every DV victim on the planet/that you do such a thorough moral inventory of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:22 PM
-7

Ban?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 09:26 AM
1

Have you been here long enough to make those claims about the sub? It's a constant back and forth between the different directions envisioned/what we think would net the users needed to give a pro-male movement any chance of not devolving to an /r/mensright or delusionally centrist community.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 01:44 AM
-2

I don't think it's a stretch that she's on the left; I just flinch at the idea she appeals to the wider male left on this site.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 12:47 AM
4

Kidology is too centrist brained for me at this point also her Amber Heard take was so uninformed and likely due to said centrist brain. But I believe she's genuinely more empathetic to men and can somewhat soberly talk about make issues more than the majority of video essayists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/24 09:05 PM
-2

Suggesting her for people on the left is a stretch despite this subreddits consistent insistence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/24 09:02 PM
4

It's an endless fight to keep this sub from spiraling further
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 05:51 PM
7

Kamala's campaign is making a strong effort to appeal rightward/as if the country is a united front. And the Dem's have been far too apologetic around things like the basket of deplorables/adhering to bullshit ettiquite/norms; we can make the case without feigning contrition, and to an extent democratic politicians at least have steered away from such rhetoric. People rejected MAGA in the midterms and in 2020; the dems aren't doing their best but they're doing enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 10:29 AM
10

Kamala is running a good campaign; for however much I hate the messaging they've had around black men, including actual ads endorsed by the campaign, I wouldn't say she's repeating Clinton's mistakes at all and that those who claims so are engaging in wishful thinking around the vindication they'd recieve from her hypothetical loss, vs sober analaysis. Men are an important demographic for the dems to sway and I've maintained for awhile that the biggest risk to leftward politics, is the slim marg…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 10:22 AM
3

Her defenders are some of the worst actors on reddit; disingenuous but effective in their methods.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 04:07 AM
3

This comment is giving troll; especially given the number of literally sourced and directly discussing the comments of the indivudals involved, comments on this post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/24 04:00 PM
4

Richard Reeves x Thetinmen? This is a must listen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/24 12:57 AM
2

Why would the Justice have stated Depp should have sued Amver directly if it was irrelevant whether or not she was a party? Anyways; that tiktok strawman is eternally self-fellating and reductionist towards a trial that saw engagment far beyond a single app.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/24 02:54 PM
2

Yes ooga booga go be a shut in and stay away from us or whatever
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 05:39 PM
4

Amber wasn't a defendant in the U.K. trial my individual; she wasn't a party at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 12:38 AM
2

No they weren't; the full audio is even worse for most sane people. No one should watch that vapid propaganda piece.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/24 02:18 AM
2

It's confirmation bias in motion
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/24 02:17 AM
3

I want to see if you'll aknowledge that you're spreading misinformation and accepting one of Amber's clear lies/fantastical explanations in contrast to the clear conculsion that she referred to a vague "incident" to justify her fable of a stair case story. Your camp claims that Amber was released moments after the airport incident with Taysa; in- truth she spent the night in jail and was released with the contingency to report all of her movements to the court of the county of her arrest, a cour…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/24 02:16 AM
1

And on your edit. Likewise a decade from now when the promised social retrospective on Amber ala Britney never arrives- hopefully you people will have the humility to apologize after realizing how wrong and duped you were and how toxic your camp behaved. If more doesn't drop decimating your narrative in the years between then and now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 03:58 PM
1

That you lack effective empathy and show zero effort to correct that; defer to whatever narrative causes the least mental discomfort, that you ignore ample evidence and critical analysis that makes the absurdities and inconsistencies of Amber's claims clear- etc. Total nonsense that you don't know what I'm trying to communicate as you aren't an idiot- it was a dismissive reply claiming that all your accusations were a confession (every claim of bias F.D makes in the video is the trap he fell int…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 03:53 PM
1

This but uno reverse Edit: Never claimed anyone didn't know male victims exist btw Never would as it's a claim easily responded to with "nuh uh"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 03:39 PM
1

I argue all across the site thats far from remaining in an echo chamber kk
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 03:17 PM
2

Profound
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 02:40 PM
2

Heyyyyy it's my favorite bad faith deppvheardtrial poster; good to see you in the wider world
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 02:33 PM
3

"I was in the same position as you a year ago. It seemed absurd that anyone would believe Amber Heard. Until you actually READ about the things Depp admitted to. Listen to the audios." Drop your presumption that we aren't aware of your camps talking points. "That man is worth a quarter of a BILLION dollars. As leftist men we should have immediately saw the class based power imbalance in the court and immediately cried foul for the sake of women." Class based power imbalance against a wealthy whi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 02:32 PM
2

Were women policed around relating to celebrities/rich women in circumstances far off from their own throughout #metoo and in recent years?. From advocating for them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 05:59 AM
2

🙄
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 04:42 AM
2

Words of Penny https://x.com/twistandshout77/status/1427739219699642374?t=0XA17aIIt3zDqdH1zvgT1A&s=19 There's my appeal to authority to match yours buddy Edit: also the way you hyperfocus on misspellings is indicative of your mal-intent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:49 AM
2

Thank you Sorry I should step away from this thread I might be going overboard with my reports and now im getting into the mud with these people
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:40 AM
2

I engage fairly with people in this thread and all over my post history. Im not engaging with someone who comes in this community for the clear purpose to mock and misunderstand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:39 AM
3

Presentation is apart of persuasion; her goal in scoring the video is to present Amber's testimony in a light those who saw it live didn't perceive it whilst invalidating all other testimony with literal clown music; and that's just a single aspect of her fundementally flawed analysis. It's like when you all misrepresent Deppdelusion as a fair community from which to be informed and not one that bans any bit of info/comment that could be seen as even slightly counteracting your narratives on the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:38 AM
2

Can we get a mod in this thread Bad faith/insulting brigaders are about /u/2717192619192
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:32 AM
2

You arent worth engaging with just off of your OP None of you are; either your approach is intrinsically abusive/dismissive which shows bad faith or you do the ol Deppdelusion block after replying and then lie about it tactic, orrrr you stop replying after being pushed to actually answer a quesiton asked/aknowledge something sourced. What I engage with in this thread is pretty clear; you didn't pass the low bar of decent conduct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:14 AM
2

So I checked their profile and they're brigading from deppdelusion hence the typical tactics
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:08 AM
2

Reported. Clearly a bad faith actor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:06 AM
3

/u/Idkfriendsidk is responding to people and then blocking in order to prevent rebuttals fo their information, it's a common tactic of Amber Heard supporters and worthy of banning/comment deletion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 12:54 AM
2

Wow if you're claiming the "unsealed documents" counteract what came prior and it's always attatched to the idea Depp supporters bumbled into "unsealing" their downfall; then someone should explain the truth of the motives and acts that lead up to their release and breaks them down; or would you just rather they just swallow Deppdelusion slop. That post is far fairer than anything your camp produces.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 12:37 AM
7

It's sickening the way you people disrepresent a ruling of probabilities in a libel trial with far less evidence and no burden of proof on Amber as she wasn't even a party, as detenrming an abuser whilst downplaying a defamation trial in which she was a party. So intellectually dishonest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 12:24 AM
2

Dont listen to their lies https://medium.com/@xanonanonymous/a-tale-of-two-narratives-the-unsealed-documents-73b6ec37cfc
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 12:21 AM
2

Reported for bullying; you lead with an insult and thusly aren't acting in good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 11:12 PM
5

Being sued isn't confirmation of anything; it's being sued. Once again, can you give me one person in Dell's familial and friendly life that states they've been hit by him; that's what I asked of your. And don't respond to me unless you either answer my questions as they are or state why the question isn't actually pertinent- try not to argue like a right-winger. I'll show you how to do it. Amber hit her sister, Rocky, and is proud of her ability to get "trailer park" real fast. https://www.news…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:59 PM
3

Care to respond to what my comment notes; why don't you note Medusone's manipulative editing and stark bias when reccomending her propogandic series to people?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:38 PM
2

Reported for harassment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:34 PM
3

It's a propoganda piece that's main axiom is Amber is always telling the truth and Depp is always lying. A vapid piece for those looking to confirm their bias. Amber's tall tales of rape are improbable in the level of violence described and Medusone literally putting melodramatic music over all of her testimony and clown music over that of anyone she seeks to discredit doesn't make Amber's testimony any less ridiculous than the day she spoke it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:32 PM
2

Reported due to being unproductive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:27 PM
2

No. It was a ruling of probabilities on whether a publication had cause to believe what it published was true. From here you or whomever else claims that Justice Nicols assesment is worthy of more consideration than the juries deliberaiton. I disagree and claim Amber had no burden of proof and was taken on face meaning the case was less thorough than VA where she was a party. I reference Judge Alcatrez deeming the UK trial as unfair towards Depp, you claim the case would have been easier for Dep…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:26 PM
3

"dArv0" DARVO is just an acronym used to discern dynamics that would still be present without it's usage. The way you people fling around DARVO as if you've tapped into higher knowledge by using a non-empirical tool for police officers is hilarious. And I can't take those like yourself seriously as your whole usage of DARVO is in ignorance to the main tactic used to abuse and quiet men, the act of or threat of false accusations. Unless one's analaysis acknowledges that empirical reality and the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:17 PM
5

Do you acknowledge that multiple people in Amber's personal life are confirmed to have been hit by her? Her sister as well as Rocky. Can you find a single person in Depp's familial and friendly life that has stated "Depp put his fist to me body" besides Amber. Just one. And no flinging a bottle in a direciron away from a person is not putting fist to chest, head, or elsewhere. Edit: for some reason I can't reply to the comment below from Barnacle; if they blocked me after replying then their com…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:09 PM
3

The only things that are unprecedented about Depp V Heard is the gender of the one of the parties alleging abuse as well as it's status as the first true "trial of the century" of the tiktok era; aside from Rittenhouse which built the foundation for what was to come. It was simply tailor fit for the zeitgeist in the American tradition of high-profile trials that speak to the wider culture, I'm talking all the way back to Clarence Darrow, pre-Casey Anthony, pre-OJ, pre-etc; which allowed or quick…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 10:03 PM
5

The unsealed documents narrative is a belief that satisfies the ego of those that avoided the case due to their in-laid biases but wanted a reason to support the female party and or a those whom already supported Amber; a trick on the ignorant. This person likely can't be convinced otherwise but anyone else should check out the piece below for the actual timeline/truth of the events. https://medium.com/@xanonanonymous/a-tale-of-two-narratives-the-unsealed-documents-73b6ec37cfc
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 09:47 PM
2

Did Deppdelusion finally get the alert about this thread or something? No one that is outside of your little info bubble and isn't amenable to the social pressure that comes with your politics, is going to buy the misrepresentation of the UK case relative to VA. You won't convince them on it not being pertinent who was a party. You won't be able to sell Amber advocate legal jargon i.e "court certified-" abuser. Save yourself the trouble and take a different approach than that tired appeal to aut…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 09:42 PM
3

Why do you find Depp V Heard and whatever other nebulous/publicly discussed cases comparable? You do realize that you're singling out the sole prominent case of the alleged victimhood of a male with a female primary agressor to stake your claim on? Do you find that sound? And do you acknowledge that mainstream press nearly unanimously had a pro-Heard slant (Heard's camp will twist to somehow claim that TMZ was actually in Depp's) unlike in comparative cases i.e Megan Thee Stallion and Tory Lanez…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 09:36 PM
3

No it isn't and it's offensive for you to come in here and imply our perspectives (or at least mine) are driven by emotion rather than a consistent application of my lifelong understanding of domestic violence and ability to reason. I don't want your appeals to empathy and appeals to emotion; either say something tangible or don't say anything at all. I don't operate like that. Maybe say what you agree with from the linked propogranda regurgitation piece; I'd happily engage with tangibles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 09:23 PM
1

You can keep your strawmanning assumptions outside of this subreddit. Come back with good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 09:20 PM
1

If you don't want to fight for future generations then you're part of the problem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/24 10:42 PM
15

Keep in mind that this is who feminists will source when they say "men do actually have good figures to look to" btw
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 01:01 AM
10

Exactly; you take the first message that aligns with your ignorance/unstated bias at face. I actually didn't expect that so you went under my expectations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 08:11 PM
18

Men are becoming disaffected from the left and more skeptical of feminism but we are not flooding to the right and becoming tater tots at the rate that its suggested. The danger for the left is slim margins of disaffected (as in mentally checking out of the poltiical process) men and maybe a minority of those who turn to the right flipping elections for the republicans; it's not a mass exodus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 07:08 PM
15

Nope. The well reasoned/fact-founded/non-belittling emotive perspective on the case is of Depp as a survivor of gross abuse who's flaws in no way beget equivocating from the public.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 07:04 PM
17

Young men don't vote right in large; it's way more complex than that, this is a left wing subreddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 07:02 PM
11

1)Where have I made the implication that one party is "evil" and the other next to christ? Quote it. Just because someone see's the female party as the primary aggressor and isn't overly obsessed with laying into a victim who's flaws are already laid bare, doesn't mean they're calling Depp "he who is without sin," you're opposing a sentiment that isn't present; that's never been my approach to victims male or female and never will be. Sure you can go on Twitter and find the stray fanatic making …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 07:00 PM
47

https://imgur.com/a/uNkyGt6 https://x.com/ContraPoints/status/1527805192804106241?t=_Y2S_hJUhbXgYjdTKoCO6Q&s=19 https://twitter.com/ContraPoints/status/1532773667284951046 The tiktok narrative that Contra pushes is a total strawman representation of those that disbelieved Amber Heard. It serves to elevate oneself, often a person who abstained from following the trial itself (as Natalie did) as someone who saw "it" true rather than just another lefty defaulting to the position that challenges the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 06:31 PM
23

No. Depp had an amount of evidence and witness testimony that had he been a woman no one would have questioned his imperfect victimhood Mutual abuse or "they're both bad" is the cope that those that later came out for Amber or those that want to present themselves as above the fray/low in interest in the case put forth. It keeps them from splitting due to the cases facts and sociologal meta not aligning with their bias as you know that had a woman been in a comparative situation, they'd have had…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 06:17 PM
22

My original thread on the post that lead to FD making this video. https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1ezg7qv/fd_signifier_showing_his_susceptibility_to/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 05:59 PM
60

I wish those leftists existed in any relevant online space, organization, or in the content creator sphere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 05:54 PM
63

Yes. Go on Google Scholars and look up Amber Heard and Johnny Depp. Go look at what happened when the City University of New York tried to interview a female alumni that represented Depp.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 05:52 PM
1

No. The moderation here would immediately ban all conservative interlocutors if they were serious as their avid participation in this community will inevitably lead to it's downfall. Sadly the best we have don't even recognize what needs to be done.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/24 04:29 AM
12

Because if I go on any feminist community on this website i'll be insulted, downvoted, or banned for opposing their misinfo and faulty understanding of male suffering driven apology for gross abuser Amber Heard. Because if I try to talk about the sexual abuse of boys by being predominately perpatrated by women I'll be dogpiled and rejected for not taking a "bY 0ther meN" approach even though the stats and basic deduction doesn't align with that narrative, and women are far from blameless in inva…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/24 04:25 AM
0

It's serious. The mods need to be stronger about curating this community. Right wing interlocutors will sink it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 02:22 PM
1

Your should be banned from the community and would be if the mods admitted what needs to be done
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 01:59 AM
2

Yuck
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 01:58 AM
2

Okay. Then my answer is thay my feelings aren't more important than the factual, present harm the right represents. Green party fantsisists or male advoactes thinking they're making a principled stand when they don't even have a platform from which them stepping down would mean anything. I have two options and one however slowly shows more progress.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 01:15 AM
2

No. But there isn't a bone in my body that would be okay with abstaining from voting morally or intelectually. If you dont get it you dont get it but theres a reason a lot of people in this thread have answered the same and I hope it's the more prominent mentality on this subreddit lest if fall apart with anti-elctoralism and equivocation with the right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 01:08 AM
1

I think it's weird to use a character (Johnny Bravo) where the premise of the whole show is a parody of basically a pick up artist and his antics to illustrate this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 05:13 PM
3

Not a single bit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 05:05 PM
3

I still see it as a clear road block for a defendant seeking to prove their innocence, pushed by feminist activists in the wake of a trial wherein the plantiffs sought to mislead the court, and is as far as I'm aware still being challanged in some areas of canada for the unprecedented/unequal nature of the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 02:03 AM
2

https://imgur.com/a/gCe7zxQ Gender hostility against men and boys (misandry) predicts sexual coercion against them. You clearly don't study how hatred is implicated in the sexual victimisation of people besides women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:55 PM
0

Why play daft? You do underatand that the letter necessitates a false understanding of the trials sociological meta and only serves the desires of those that support Heard i.e the organizers of the letter Kat Tenbarge and Michelle Dauber, both Heard supporters and the latter and abusive Stanford professor instrumental in getting eyes one the Brock Turner rape case. Same as the letter from the International Socialist Alternative on the trial, same as the feminists that got the largest public univ…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:52 PM
0

https://www.thelighthouseproject.ca/articles/ghomeshi-rules-declared-constitutional-by-the-supreme-court-of-canada
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:33 PM
2

Pretty sure the only one that did was Ellen Barkin whom was a fling and like you said essentially amounted to nothing as an accusation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:27 PM
7

You want examples huh? -Michelle Elliot of Kidscape (a former chair of the World Health Organization and a deeply credible woman/victim advocate, non-MRA strawman, who's been awarded by the Queen and written one of if not the seminal book on female sexual abuse of children, and who's biggest impediments were other feminists) details such obstruction in this video. https://youtu.be/1WdTAJ9_IY0?si=5lJ0UWmQprtMIVBd -For a modern rhetoric/a non-empirical example: Statements like "not all men but alw…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:23 PM
15

Just going to quote myself here on my issues with the way feminists/people on this subreddit that also addresses the way feminists on this website and elsewhere talk of Depp. "It's intellectually dishonest the extent to which people like yourself throw out stats on false accusations or on anything relating to potential societal/systemic issues faced by men, given the extent to which leftwing thought routinely/justly challenges official narratives and breaks down statistics as they're more than j…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 10:41 PM
10

Man of color here who disagrees; I constantly see white feminism used as an indicator of where the movents misconstrued/harmful, only to see the vast majority of WOC feminist communities and talking heads share their stances and say the grossest thing's; feminist theory driven by black women has especially been detrimental/influential and very much pushed by the white bourgeoisie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/24 05:18 PM
9

That doesn't prevent molestation and can be used as a cover for such assaults on account of "who'd be willing to touch you-" on top of maleness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/24 10:24 PM
1

I think you don't know who Destiny he is; not a single thing about his decade plus long career implies having the disposition to or being in the practice of placating anyone in any space he's existed in. Also I looked to zero public figures to guidance but I have always believed his platform would be helpful for spreading leftist pro-male advocacy if there was a suitabale speaker to do so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/24 07:49 PM
10

He always seems so close to "getting" things gender wise, but always falls back on asigning all onus and almost a bootstrapping mentality to men. Way back when I remember arguing that people from this subreddit should try and get on stream if they were well spoken and versed in progressive politics but this community has always had an overley anti-Destiny stance which is wierd given the sentiments that are given a pass in this community. He's trying to hard course correct for his prodeminately m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/24 05:45 PM
2

Please don't kamikaze this community.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/24 01:15 AM
-1

I dream of the day people such as yourself aee actively gayekept from thie community and stop sinking any semblance of a pro-male collective that can appeal to the wider left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 06:39 PM
1

This is supposed to be a left wing subreddit tf is this thread If this is getting 11 upvotes then this is more confirmation of the mods just not being tough enough on conservative leaning or sympathetic users
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 05:29 PM
5

Michelle Elliot of Kidscape (a former chair of the World Health Organization and a deeply credible woman/victim advocate, non-MRA strawman, who's been awarded by the Queen and written one of if not the seminal book on female sexual abuse of children, and who's biggest impediments were other feminists) details such obstruction in this video. https://youtu.be/1WdTAJ9_IY0?si=5lJ0UWmQprtMIVBd
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 09:09 PM
1

Exhibit of why male advocacy is doomed for failure
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 05:33 PM
5

The sad thing is he's far from alone, I wish I had a higher profile/there was an easy way to like anonymously contact journalists to put them on the story. I'll be posting about it tomorrow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/24 10:38 PM
2

Something I just have to note is when you search Taylor Giavasis's twitter, you can find much and more about men with words of disgust despite her proximity to her mother's behavior, her own and that of other women, and she's raising a son. https://x.com/search?q=from%3A%40taylorgiavasis%20son&t=udmtNaSeQ9062KtmzihQMA&s=09 This is a young woman with all the "correct" and socially approved progressive perspectives, easily sliding into the non-toxic squad despite having been party to perpetuating …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/24 09:37 PM
2

I forgot to link Steven's video addressing the assault accusations and general issues that plagued his life as a result of this saga: https://youtu.be/NtUaoQYPy_Y?si=Bqm1xq7cDW897WVr This is a bit risque and so I didn't want to compromise the OP with it but given the regularity of which such is published in highly viewed youtube videos, articles, viral tweets and so on here it is And lastly: A video featuring viviankindle who's in a screenshot above; a former wild N out girl @viviankindle on IG …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/24 09:11 PM
0

Your take should be ban worthy on this subreddit if the mods are serious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/24 07:20 PM
1

The moderation allows too many posts that are the sort to ultimately kill this community/deaden it's appeal to broader leftwing men. This is a community wholly lacking in strategic acumen and will remain that way for the foreseeable future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/24 04:24 AM
1

Men with personality disorders use this subreddit too genius- they're everywhere because they're people; you're so blinded by trauma that you can only see anything less than your bigotry as advocating for a lack of accountability and anyone with a personality disorder as embodying the position opposite of yours. Fuck your feelings, your feelings will fuck this subreddit; you'll just ward off every single other left leaning men who whilst feeling disparate from feminist spaces still is largely in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 07:40 AM
0

Scroll my post history if you want to know my thoughts on false accusations; I didn't make this thread to make people with personality disorders male or female feel unwelcome or ashamed. There are safe spaces for you to vent without fear of judgement and willfully and knowingly harpooning a cause due to your inability to read the cultural climate and put your ego and trauma aside. Sorry to say but the dehumanization and stigmatization of those with personality disorders is out of style and that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 02:09 AM
0

I know the research, if you want male advocacy to sink even further from the little platform it has then stay hopped up on trauma. Your views don't and won't coincide with the left, cope. Go to BPDlovedones for your safe space.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 01:49 AM
7

The fact that they claim the audio is edited to be misleading and that gets paraded around as an actual point is insane; especially when the audio came from the audio that Amber provided during the UK case, that was vetted, and then given directly to the VA courts. The audio is even worse in it's entire context and yet they claim that the youtuber who originally uploaded it cut it to be misleading.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 07:29 PM
3

There isn't any evidence. And you can take the rest of your patronizing nonsense elsewhere or respond without the unasked for emoting. You're misinformed, mislead, and talking with authority you haven't done enough research to voice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 02:52 PM
3

A victim becoming an abuser is a dissimilar issue from the idea of two people terrorizing one another. I don't think the person you're responding to would make the claim anyone isn't capable of abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 07:57 AM
0

Cringe virtue signal just vote blue
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 03:07 AM
1

I'm not underestimating it but also in the least rude way possible it isn't something I care about within the context of the floundering social media game in swaying the people that matter on this topic. The people that as my OP states I screamed about for many-a-year as the people in pro-Depp spaces continued to argue me down about who would believe her, why we need to take their words at face value, and why a lot of the politically obtuse statements around the trial and linking of sources left…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 02:51 AM
11

Depp V Heard has always been a banned topic on Menslib; it would 100% be deleted and i'm certain the moderation either supports Heard or falsely equivocate and attack Depp too much relative to this victimhood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 01:15 AM
4

And on the physically violent against men claim; we have an incident decades past with Paparazzi hounding his pregnant wife during a time where Princess Diana would still be on the mind and we have the altercation on the set of City of Lies. An altercation that Brooks settled over due to a witness possessing timestamped photos, and an altercation that every single person on set contested Brooks recollection of; for all Amber supporters talk of conspiracisms once again the only way to deny everyt…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 01:11 AM
4

So you'd be interested in knowing that Amber's ex Taysa Van Ree never spoke for Amber on stand in the past or during the recent trial, in-fact she refused every opportunity she had to speak for Amber in VA. https://www.tmz.com/2016/06/09/officer-beverly-leonard-arrested-amber-heard/ (Leonard testified live during the trial. ) Amber supporters claim that Amber was released moments after the airport incident with Taysa; in- truth she spent the night in jail and was released with the contingency to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 12:55 AM
2

This ableism shouldn't be in this community and almost as importantly is horrendous optics, don't sink a cause due to a lack of willingness to tailor your words better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 12:19 AM
3

The way in which specific people in "pro-Depp" spaces talked of those with BPD was a poor talking point as their language only served to push people way, including those who may have personality disorders or seen themselves in Amber's thinking patterns but instead learned to manage it. Notice that I said feminist spaces are unwilling to embrace the ways in which personality disorders can influence the perpatration of abuse; I don't want to dead the discussion on that and in my history with menta…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 11:59 PM
8

Here's a past comment of mine that speaks to this issue and you may find relevant: "It's clear you didn't follow the case, you're just repeating talking points from those that also didn't follow the live trial or the specifics of the case/it's online meta. Ultimately, a feminist may say men lack the words to emotionally express themselves due to "toxic masculinity" wilfully inflicted or otherwise, a sentiment that extends towards male understanding of their own abuse. They'll unironically make t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 11:21 PM
3

If you search the subreddit his post is on there was a thread this week complaining about Amber's presence in a video of his about problematic celebs; so he's apolgizing for that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 11:15 PM
14

Wonder what misinformaiton you're waffling about. He has his issues like any human being but there's zero evidence of a history of abuse on his part.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 11:11 PM
7

Yes if you search the subreddit his post is on there was a thread complaining about Amber's presence in a video of his about problematic celebs; so he's apolgizing for that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 11:09 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 11:04 PM
2

I don't think you know what a hotep is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:57 PM
1

Your entire approach to the OP; the bias of the subreddit is apparent/intrinsic to my thread even being made so the way in which you mentioned it as if it mitigated anything about it/the purpose of showing a post from FD is just weird.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:46 PM
1

There is no video, did you even read the OP properly? And you jumped in without even looking to verify if that was FD and mentioning the bias of Deppdelusion in a way that wasn't relevant to the OP or what FD wrote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:36 PM
2

Responding to your edit, what do you mean by "You thought it was over?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:34 PM
22

Not a grifter; a true believer, you should take what most people say on the face. Someone like Consciously Lee now that's a probable grifter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:33 PM
19

He isn't important; him as an example of what the wider feminist left sees. as the ideal male advocate/what talking heads represent as far as wider cultural beliefs is. This is just one act in the line of many that make him a buffoon but I found it worth sharing due to the extent he's pushed as a voice for men; it wasn't posted as a sign of him losing non-existent standing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:30 PM
8

When he refers to conversations with other content creators and wanting ideas for a future video, and posts without even needing to; that's willful rather than the path of least resistance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 05:23 PM
38

That was also my tipping point; one thing that's a frequent and funny talking point that's also in FD's post is that the "mutual abuser" narrative was initially used by those unwilling to see Depp as the clear imperfect male victim of a female primary aggressor. By those who'd laughed away the term and kept it cordoned off to essentially men's rights and right-leaning spaces, by the false equivocators who've increasingly renounced that take and came out as Amber Heard supporters. Most people wer…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 04:44 PM
0

No; I don't think the red pill has any place in male advocacy and should be repelled lest any community fall apart. It's already the uncommon left wing man that's willing to step outside of the social pressure from feminists/fellow progressives and their own views, to come into a community like this. And even me with my relative comfortability being outside of said spaces and personal history of embracing my own approach to culture war type issues, refused for years to post in communities like m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/24 04:23 PM
6

Dating is important; the extent to which dating issues and red pill discourse is amplified derails any male oritented advocacy and subsumes too much space in critique of feminism/general debate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/24 01:02 AM
1

It's disingenuous to imply that the statistics/crime stats on this issue approach anything close to their reality
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 04:41 PM
1

So what you want to do is look into sexual abuse perpatrated by nuns and see how much knowledge you're lacking
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 04:39 PM
12

Glad this article was made it compiles so much of what I and other have said with the proper argumentation in one place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/24 06:31 AM
19

You learned nothing from the responses to your terrible framing of black men, our general existence, and experience relative to feminism huh? This post is even worse in that regard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 02:45 PM
1

I replied to him in a different thread and he took offense to my replies; and I guess he thinks im harrasing him by replying here? I'll just block him and stop interacting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 04:59 AM
0

Why can't you accept that your preference is not what male advocacy needs?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 12:24 AM
36

Feminist communties have convinced themselves that audio isn't actually saying that. They're a total wash. Go on google scholars and look up amber heard and johnny depp and see how many social scientists have written extensive apology for her so far
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/24 10:16 AM
3

I asked a quesiton and you were unable to answer it because you didn't like the tone; the answer is nothing, menrights achieves and will continue to achieve nothing and so all you could respond with is how it makes you "feel." There isn't a solution to any issue that doesn't on some level take a poltiical/cultural slant and the only way forward for men is through the left; we relate more to the left in theory or at some point in our lives than those that think your middling dispositon actually m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 01:31 AM
2

Because people like you willfully dont understand why we're strict on the left wing delineation; we should be stricter. I dont want to be welcoming to people that want to fundemtally break away from the literal name of the subreddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 01:27 AM
1

What social/policitcal change is mensrights achieveing huh?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 12:45 AM
0

Because we want a subreddit to adovcacte for good social change i.e nothing right wing and the presence of people who don't understand that delineation will ruin this sunredddit and only hurt men. Grow and change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/24 08:42 PM
-8

Do you think this was warranted? Yes. If every thread that merely has the man's name goes the same way. optics and everything to do with Reeves' message being muddled. Look if you also want no man to have a large public platform for discussing these issues then just say so; you don't need to worship Reeves or follow in his stead to simply use his words or to be the person pushing more feminist critical thought in spite of them; he's only undermining other male advocates if you give him too much …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 11:15 AM
1

Reeves isn't my savior and he's had other statements that bother me; I'll critique him when it's correct to and he even engages with fair critique on twitter on occasion, it's important that he has agitators. The clip isn't revelatory for me either; it's just an excellent clip that I can utilize in a number of ways. Just like you don't need to like Reeves to reference his efforts and piggy back off of his work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 06:00 AM
-6

You get that was political strategy that shouldn’t have had to be the case though ? A pregnant young black lady deserved every right not to be moved also but was good to be the poster child? You do see the problem there right ? Just because it’s not pretty does not mean it isn’t right. 🗿I don't care that it shouldn't have been the case. Making these problems palatable may help, but if people are going to be constantly pandering to feminists, then nothing will ever really be achieved. Like honest…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 05:42 AM
-16

Fortunately Reeves isn't someone who'd rather achieve nothing with his life by being bumbling strategically and offputting to anyone not already a true believer like some on this sub would have him be. You sound like the sort of person who wishes they could time travel back before the Montgomery Bus Boycott and make sure Rosa isn't the activist they make their stand with and instead promoted the pregant, optically imperfect young black lady (Claudette Colvin) just for the principle of it and som…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 05:21 AM
10

They're never ever apologizing for that brick lady bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 05:05 AM
18

Cool. I'll continue to recognize that as boys and men have near zero of a platform for advocacy that people like Reeves are much more usueful than those that complain about him incessantly. Begars cant be choosers and I believe Reeves has the capacity to shift his views as well as not blow his whole load and tank his career/efforts by being the radical y'all want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 05:03 AM
22

Yes, really. Emphatically such so to the point that anytime even if stated in ignorance/as an aside it needs to be argued against virulently to make clear that this subreddit isn't white male "identitarian." No offense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 01:50 AM
44

Black men are attacked relentlessly; we're only props for discussion surrounding police brutality and it's only ignorance that allows people to come in here and proclaim us as apart of the progressive protected fold. Just go onto twitter or listen to mainstream media broadcasts from now until the election. To see black men being called "the weakest link," "white male adjacent," our voting trends tarnished by lies that prop up black women as the saviors to all despite black men being only second …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 01:19 AM
2

Yes, OP is wrong. Yes I've also seen men such as OP on Purple Pill do the "it's not that bad thing," and should have acknowledged it as an example of contradictory beliefs and behaviors. But in my experience/view 99.9% of the time these are two different types of people and their existence is generally only brought up to deflect from any measure of responsibility from women as parties to these societal norms or feminists of any sex in activism, government, academia etc contributing to the instit…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:02 PM
4

It's pretty absurd to look at the population and then say that only one-half of it contributes to the victim blaming many men suffer based on what you choose to see; it wasn't just men in my life trying to impart toxic norms onto me, it was the women as well no differently than anyone else. The most credible research on this/the only replication study shows women as sharing the same misconceptions about male sexuality that lead to female perpetrated assault and downplayal of one's own behavior. …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:34 PM
–

Tradcons are not the same as the other groupings, many incels wouldn't subscribe to the rhetoric tradcons have around male emotions or necessarily share their politics. You're just equating being bad and right or righr adjacent to total similarity; so it's more confusing to you than it ought to be of most incels having grown up identifying as on the left.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:46 PM
–

You're conflating conservatives with red pill with incels with tradcons etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:39 PM
6

Framing "boy moms" as a bias against daughters especially when those that call themselves such tend to have male children only is pretty silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:37 PM
8

It's "manosphere" types as if the manosphere exists in all area of society in a quanitifable way. It's pretty absurd to look at half of the populaiton and then attribute a refrain half of the population has faced for deacades on end to solely a specific subsection; it wasn't just men in my life trying to impart toxic norms onto me, it was the women as well, no different than anyone else. The most credible research on this/the only replication study shows women as sharing the same misconceptions …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 04:17 PM
–

You're assuming too much. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1e94kwb/do_you_consider_it_a_red_flag_when_a_woman_is_a/lecgim2/ This reply of mine in this thread hits at what you've just said but I'll expound further in response to you (seriously read that reply first I source things). Personally as a male victim i'm worn out seeing people like yourself get praise/validatio for claiming only or mainly men invalidate the sexual abuse of boys by saying things like "nicccceee"; so I co…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:30 AM
–

^ example of a feminist confidently assured that their concern is actually comprehensive and of the myth that the majority of those that rape boys and men are of the same sex I'll keep advocating for girls to be taught consent as well rather than walk with assumptive virtue thank you very much
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:09 AM
–

Schrodingers social norms strike again; women aren't in a perpetual round of the knockout game. Do you genuinely believe boys are told adnaseuem to never hit a girl and that manifests exactly nowhere in society? And you're using murder rates to illustrate your point about male violence? Extremely far off from tank's statement. Have you ever even seen a video of a woman hitting a man relentlessly knowing the liekliehood of retaliation is low and if retaliated on, the man or boy being immeadietly …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:01 AM
–

https://racism.org/articles/intersectionality/gender/2210-he-touched-me-five-snapshots https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3064497/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235757639_Racial_Differences_in_Age_at_First_Sexual_Intercourse_Residential_Racial_Segregation_and_the_Black-White_Disparity_Among_US_Adolescents https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2730066 At the time of me typing this there are two downvotes on my first reply; something I'm only mentioning d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:49 AM
–

Depending on what people like to discuss it's reasonable for feminism involved topics to arise on a date without being an academic; books, televison, music, online "drama," life stories, current events etc. It would with any woman i'm likely to see to varying degrees. Though some women insert specific questions as a test on views, which would definitely be a red flag for some people.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:33 AM
–

Black women and girls are the primary sexual abusers of black boys and as a result we have the youngest sexual debut of any demographic, and "teach boys not to rape," that sort of rhetoric in feminist spaces that curbs the disucssion of female sexual offending and the active opposition feminist activists/figures have been in legistlating around said abuse and in curbing research into female sexual offending- for decades. The self-assured assumption that their empathy/sympathy for male victims is…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:21 AM
–

Nope. He was the clear imperfect victim of a primary aggressor that not only physically and mentally abused him to a gross degree, but went public with her accusations as a means of gaining status; which she succeeded in with the ACLU, a UN ambassadorship, movie roles, exuberant speaking fees as a face for survivors and more. So even if I was to grant you your nonsense equivalencey only one of the parties weaponized social norms/the courts as a means of continuing their abuse and that person was…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:19 AM
–

No. Because given they wouldn't anticipate it then it's not as though I totally lose whatever basic social ability got us talking in the first place, the many other places we'd ideologically align as people on the left, and what my general disposition and our conversations have lead her to understand about me, my life, and thinking processes. Conversation voice to voice/face to face in a personal context is totally different than debating through text; the feminist strawmen falls apart in the fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 05:59 AM
–

Wariness and confusion/admitted lack of understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 05:41 AM
–

No. The women that like me and the women I'd pursue and those I befriend are generally feminists and don't anticipate it when my "meninism" arises. It just depends on their individual character/approach to discussing contentious topics. Only one or two opinions would be a deal breaker red flag for me if after discussing them their perspective doesn't shift.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 05:37 AM
–

The media isn't what's making every feminist community on this website stump for Amber Heard or spread genuine misinformation on the rates of sexual abuse men/boys face; all a man needs to do to become feminist skeptical/feel an anti-male current is go directly to the source; whether that's online forums, institutions, content creators, or academia etc. No strawman of every man who doesn't express total allegiance to feminist orthodoxy coming from second-hand misinterpretations of their words.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 05:31 AM
3

More men will become disaffected from feminists and those that turn to the right or more likely simply check out of the poltical process will be the difference in conservatives winning close elections; feminists won't right their poor messaging and half-baked theories as feminist communties/talking heads seem resistant to self-criticism that strays from orthodoxy and are assured of their own righteousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 12:09 AM
4

It's pretty vibe based/generally projection of one's own understanding of consent when progressive women online assign their behavior/beliefs to women as a whole. The most credible research on this/the only replication study shows women as sharing the same misconceptions about male sexuality that lead to female perpetrated assault and downplayal of one's own behavior. https://www.scribd.com/document/643382625/Judgments-About-Male-Victims-of-Sexual-Assault-by-Women-a-35-Year-Replication-Study htt…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 07:06 PM
8

"Fuck me or I'll scream rape!" You're lost buddy; not only do women physically subdue men but such threats as above are an incredibly common means of women assaulting men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 06:53 PM
0

This is an interesting video of women responding with predatory comments to the quesiton of how they'd respond if a partner refused sex. https://youtu.be/MSEqchtpTIk?si=nGgI8HDaXxEwGiBJ
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 03:05 PM
-1

What're you trying to imply/project onto the OP and other's?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 02:57 PM
4

Can't believe comments like these are getting downvoted here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 10:54 PM
0

Of course their experiences are different; but then what? What's your end conclusion? They're still women and still have specific issues they already address that only pertain to them, so nothing changes with the verbalization of vague differences that already exist between any and every person and experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 07:03 PM
9

They consider that akin to calling transwomen men. That's why they'll only use transmisogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 06:56 PM
10

I've been encouraging stronger moderation around that for awhile; the trajectory it's on will sadly just keep most leftwing men at bay which is where we should be pulling from.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 03:46 PM
5

Your rejection of critical race theory reads as a push for color blindness when in truth race plays a role in multiple aspects of black men's existence, as you used black men as an example; CRT grew out of a black man's frustration with the racial biases in the juridical system. CRT doesn't equal liberalism or intersectionality it's it's own concept that doesn't have to be a boogeyman beating down on white men as privileged/whatever conception of it people have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 03:43 PM
10

No. Some people are just to strong im their rebukes; please keep posting. Edit: stop downvoting people and allow for discussion; I dont freaking like Bell Hooks. You can be strong in disagreement without running people off from an opportunity to have intelligent critique of a very influential feminist figure Thats what this sub should be for
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 05:56 PM
1

Because it's easier to project a web of beliefs onto a person rather than engage with the substance of what they're saying. Or if what they're saying is nonsensical/incorrect, be charitable towards their intent and chop whatever up to poor rhetoric rather than malice. We all do it; it's only natural to assume certain beliefs hold proximity to others and that those whom hold said beliefs may share specific traits; some people just take it too far and therefore can't engage in conversation in good…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 05:30 PM
10

Some people seem to think that any level of stricter moderation would make this community menslib come again or that totally open discourse is a virtue in and of itself; when we can have diagreement and free thought but within specific bounds. I'll at least keep pointing out indivudual and comments that have the risk of running this community off course.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 08:47 PM
20

You probably shouldn't have called them a sissy liberal and people that post apology for Donald Trump to argue people are being tricked into voting for Dems shouldn't be posting on this subreddit and giving us bad optics
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 08:21 PM
7

Sad turn of events.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 03:30 PM
7

Cringe words that should be deleted mods
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 02:49 PM
5

Are these chuds in the room with us?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 02:43 PM
-5

Not that but I wish some people here watched their words more and that "right wing guests" as some are flaired weren't really a thing. Tbe last few days have been markedly angry in commentary in a way that doesn't help this subreddits growth and perception at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 02:35 PM
111

Some of the best replies of the OP in the thread are getting deleted. The mods aren't letting him answer why he believes the original comic was invalidating of male victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 08:04 AM
1

I don't think more men are becoming right wing to the degree people think; I think the danger for the left is more men disengaging from the political process and that thin wire being enough to keep flipping offices for the republicans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 11:29 PM
5

It's between that and a paid email.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 02:08 PM
39

Resetera is the only mainstream left wing community online that allowed discussion on the trial as it aired and have a sizeable portion of the userbase speak for Depp. Of course; this came after the moderation was called out for unequal moderation relative to how they'd modereate threads discussing male abusers of female victims- and in the aftermath of the trial they inevitably lock/delete anything relating to Depp V Heard as people "can't be civil-" or it's " unproductive. Yet they'll let 400+…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 06:49 AM
3

We are fairly cooked
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 06:49 AM
1

If he's in any way more open to more subversive thought; then I hope that can edge out his worse positions/shift his stances with time. But I agree those positions are problems and deserve to be met with anger/strong rebukes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 06:30 PM
7

https://imgur.com/a/uNkyGt6 https://x.com/ContraPoints/status/1527805192804106241?t=_Y2S_hJUhbXgYjdTKoCO6Q&s=19 https://twitter.com/ContraPoints/status/1532773667284951046 The tiktok narrative that Contra pushes is a total strawman representation of those that disbelieved Amber Heard. It serves to elevate oneself, often a person who abstained from following the trial itself (as Natalie did) as someone who saw "it" true rather than just another lefty defaulting to the position that challenges the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 06:04 AM
13

I can't really follow Contrapoints on male issues after her incredibly ignorant/egotistical and insulting comments towards believers of Johnny Depp's victimhood, as wall as when she referred to her relatively shallow empathy for men as her "pick-me" phase. It.probbsly isn't long before she uses it as the crux of one of her videos ala Lindsay Ellis or Munecat or Rebecca Watson or Alice Capelle etc. Her lit analaysis/sexology is interesting; her Twilight/Desire video was compelling, but overall I …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 05:32 AM
2

Richard Reeves correspondence with Dr.Curry and blurb for The Man Not is one reason I'm more charitable towards his efforts than some in this space; he's threading a difficult needle in broaching male issues in the MSM.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 05:20 AM
-1

Your vote was wasted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/24 07:44 PM
2

Comments like this shouldnt be allowed in the subreddit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 08:46 PM
1

???? People's worldview matters and defines how help for men and other groups is attained/pushed for; this sub exists due to the belief that pushing leftward helps men and other groups. We support policies that are left wing because we believe right wing ideologies and policies hurt men. I have no clue what would even exist as a stance/way to help men or any group in absence of what you call an agenda. It's tiring seeing people come in here and try to water down the "left" in the subreddit name,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 07:33 AM
10

I wouldn't express dating issues as the crux of the disconnect between some men and feminists; it contributes to the negative image of male advocacy/issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 03:23 AM
6

The OP might also have misconceptions on what the facts of Depp V Heard were through the communities they look to as authorities; and think more nuance as to fault/truthfulness exists than actually did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 12:21 AM
13

https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1d3vjnk/have_you_ever_met_any_women_who_was_sympathetic/l6d886b/ As I say in the linked comment; the issue with the men that post/are highlighted in /r/askfeminists; is that "The worst thing about that community as far as the men who make the threads; is that often they're rhetorically in the gutter and ask questions in good-faith; that just so-happen to be dumb. But those are also the only comments they let through." When you see a subredd…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 12:15 AM
8

Uhm. Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/24 04:18 PM
24

Women don't need strength to rape a conscious man; though plenty do use their physicality to. They use threats/other pressures. And women molest far more than is conveyed through statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/24 01:58 PM
1

Good for you. Feminist man or woman uses toxic masculinity in discussion. Man takes issue with it contextually or fundamentally. Feminist states that "if it doesn't apply let it fly," implying that if issue is taken you must see yourself in said toxic man/trait. Said man likely doesn't but just like some transmen who come to have issues with the way masculinity/men are spoken of in LGBT spaces- it strikes at something core to their wider identity/belonging to men as a grouping, or they believe i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:40 PM
1

Feminists on Reddit barely tolerate menslib/constantly debate whether it's really full of self-interested misogyny; feminist spaces that claim to support men in actuality just support men confirming to their orthodoxy and refusing to quesiton their understanding of abuse, patriarchy, statistics, etc. Those spaces are toxic and hurt men's mental health and then we're just told to go back to the spaces that we finally broke from in the first place due to this mythical idea that men develop all fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:38 PM
5

Sexual "success" isn't a sign of virtue or lack thereof nor does it discern poltical opinions/relationship to feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:30 PM
4

How about you actually respond to the claims made about said breadth of thought and what the dominant, mainstream, accepted, non-fringe anti-male sentiments are in said feminist spaces/are spread by feminists of prominence? Reccomending a man to read askfeminists is like offering them a poison pill.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/24 01:07 AM
10

Pearl is a negative presence and should be disregarded as a voice with any value to men. An actual empty head and a misogynist; we don't endorse people like that just because they pump up men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 08:52 PM
21

Even the CPTSD subreddit supports Amber Heard and actively isolates men who voice issues with the way male trauma is addressed/men are spoken of in that space. You'll deadass see women who genuinely believe they're considerate of male issues reccomend hellholes like trollx or witchesvpatriarchy as somewhere men struggling should look to for healthy feminist perspectives/understanding.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 07:57 PM
7

A lot.. Including some who believe they are but don't have the necessary perspective for effective understanding.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 07:40 PM
23

No one who uses this subreddit would find Askfeminists insightful nor would reading it be mentally healthy for them; it's all feminists/women asking themselves a strawman about why men think/behave a certain way and then getting an equally clueless strawman response in return. In fact- a large portion of this subreddit is likely either banned from askfeminists or has had extremely negative experiences there; that community can barely tolerate menslib and you think they have a breadth of perspect…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 07:25 PM
4

This reminds me of when Liam Neeson admitted to having had racially violent thoughts back in separatist Ireland and how he wandered with the impulse to act those out on an innocent black man; which being black but also someone with a vested interest in rehabilitatiom/radical empathy, I appreciated his honesty whilst others still saw him as that decades past racist man and accused him of pawning his unasked for guilt off on others. In my mind it was that sort of radical honesty/deep look into wha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/24 02:32 AM
9

I don't like referring to people as monsters in general; and even referring to someone as an abuser or felon/criminal or other label feels weird to me as that isn't the sum of anyone's existence. My issue with your phrasing is solely due to my issue with the general calls to "leave Amber alone-" that usually come with false equivocations between the behavior of the two. So when you mention the "monster/vice versa" part; I read "don't talk about it at all" as talking about the case (which I'll ne…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/24 01:41 AM
6

Also it's important to recognIze that all talk of Amber isn't necessarily "talk of amber-" i.e I have very little interest in her as a person and have never levied the common juvenile insults against her; but like so many others, my responses to the misreporting around the case and rhetoric from feminists of prominence is conflated as harassment of her when it's actually just words in direct proportion to the amount of unprecedented support she recieved from the the left/raising awarness of what…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 11:35 PM
7

Amber isn't an irredeemable monster but she is an unreperant abuser that hasn't rescinded the lies she brought to the public, through using her accusations as a platform for fame/socal validation and monetary gain as a victim "activist." Depp's flaws as a person/fault in the relationship aren't comparable enough to vice versa the two without a multitude of qualifiers; he just wanted to live life and she wanted and got a microphone. Her acts of violence and the public slander/extent of damage suc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 11:17 PM
2

Literally the same; I fully embraced being disparate from progressive spaces due to the trial- including fandoms like the Twitter ASOIAF community where the lack of response to it compared to past celebrity abuse stories and the apology for Amber/willfull ignorance of a swath of the community, deeply disgusted me. It's extra-bad as I'd been following it since pre-UK trial; yet a month or so following the veridict the trial finally came up in a converastion with a friend I'd avoided all talk of i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 11:14 PM
5

You're right; I just find it impossible for me to healthily engage with content creators whom supported Amber Heard and or have a false understanding of the social media meta on the tiral; given the number of year's I followed the case and what I witnessed in the lefty spaces I once belonged to. It was my brain breaking moment as far as understanding his bias stemmimg from one's beliefs/social ties can construct a fiction wholesale- even having predicted the exact path these spaces and talking h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/24 12:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter