TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VicisSubsisto Archive

View 0 posts and 616 comments by VicisSubsisto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I need to know in which direction this affects your answer.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 05:56 PM
14

TERFs are radfems (that's the RF) so...
/r/MensRights31/05/26 04:42 PM
2

Would have been much clearer if you said "preferring to leave" instead of "rather leaving". Maybe that's a Britishism or something, but in the US it's a strange way of phrasing it.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 07:08 PM
5

Why ask? You know the answer.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 10:05 PM
2

No, don't change it, you ruined my already bad joke...
/r/MensRights22/04/26 02:24 PM
4

Man time has sure changed. Indeed, Man Time has been reduced by one hour on Mondays and Wednesdays.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:34 PM
5

both women stated that they thought he was joking They should have seen the punch line coming. Best joke Louis ever told tbh.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 10:08 PM
5

The show's been out for a month, how have your teachers been talking about it for ages?
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:32 PM
2

Yup. Blocking them won't undo the band but will prevent any future ones.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:08 AM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1idgahy/you_guys_are_gonna_love_this_one/
/r/MensRights30/01/25 11:04 PM
14

u/safebot, u/saferbot, and u/safestbot if anyone's wondering.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 07:25 PM
35

Many SA victims realize that false accusations hurt them and society as a whole, not just the falsely accused.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 06:58 PM
1

That is the original Twitter poster's job.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 04:26 PM
2

We have a French saying about that, it's "marquer un but contre son camp", or "score a goal against one's own team" (French people love soccer.) In English we just call it an "own goal". "Score one, but against your team" is more poetic though.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 11:09 PM
5

In some places it is automatic. There was a lawsuit, in Arizona someone renewed his license in a separate county from which he lived, it automatically registered him as a resident there and invalidated his actual voter registration, and he was not allowed to vote.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 08:25 PM
15

How about FindLaw?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:31 PM
2

You tried your best.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 05:22 PM
8

And aren't being served to her employees with questionable consent.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:00 AM
7

Nah, that's not her style.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 12:27 AM
39

Depends how they're served.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:15 PM
10

It's called the Variability Hypothesis. The mismatched chromosome pair is a suspected cause. Apparently in species where the females have mismatched chromosome you see increased female variability.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:51 AM
4

Didn't help Paul Nungesser.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:27 PM
1

Infamous left-wing, part-gaming-news-site-part-tabloid. Sister site of Gawker and Jezebel.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:58 PM
27

I'd say any 48 hour job deserves a hell of an overtime bonus.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:22 PM
25

Kotaku is not the place to look for empathy or any other sort of human decency, to be fair.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:21 PM
57

A Georgia TikTok user says two men discovered they were both fathers to a young girl when they came to pick [the young girl] up from the school where [the TikTok user] works It's not a well-written sentence.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 02:51 PM
2

That's a Facebook group but probably also applies there.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 06:11 PM
36

"Do NOT report content" Isn't that rule, in itself, reportable as a rule violation?
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:18 AM
8

The border of the classroom is defined by the walls, therefore the walls, but definition, are not "in" the classroom. I guess.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 11:39 PM
0

Or maybe we could compromise and question only the people who were in the same hotel room as the person who died.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:34 AM
1

Yeah... That's what they did there. Then they released them a few hours later.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:24 AM
-1

We can't though. We can arrest people if we know exactly where they are and they are either willing to come quietly or able to be captured.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:02 PM
6

Who the fuck is upvoting this troll?
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:27 AM
9

He's saying a man should also follow that advice.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:47 AM
1

All men hold the capacity to love and desire other men;
/r/MensRights30/04/22 04:30 PM
4

So you're saying being gay is a choice? Nah bro.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 04:06 PM
18

They talk about "the best interest of the child" but don't seem to see any problem with a pedophile having full custody of said child...
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:57 PM
3

You're the one making the (again, confirmed to be incorrect) assumption that it is sincere praise. Or you're just trying to be sarcastic yourself, and coming across as an ass.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:16 PM
7

OP used a word in the post title which usually has a positive connotation, but it's fairly clear from the body of the post (and was clarified by OP in response to another commenter, several hours before you posted this novella) that he does not approve of Bell Hooks's ideas and opinions. To miss that when so many others did not, and then to repeatedly deride your interlocutors' alleged failure of reading comprehension, is painful to watch.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 04:15 PM
2

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...
/r/MensRights24/03/22 07:55 PM
4

It definitely is.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 07:54 PM
6

Apparently she said the same thing about women with B cups in the same Twitter thread.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:18 AM
13

Well, when the fish's car breaks down, it needs a bicycle to get around...
/r/MensRights21/01/22 08:59 PM
-1

I always find it hilarious No you don't. You're not laughing, you're raging blindly. how hard people try to justify something No one's trying to justify it. Saying an apple isn't an orange doesn't mean I'm calling an apple a vegetable, and saying there are different motivations for the same crime doesn't mean it's not the same crime. Pedophilia is a mental disorder. Pedophiles are sick and need help, and are often former victims of child sexual assault themselves. If either side is trying to giv…
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:52 PM
-3

It's the same as the difference between being a kleptomaniac and a professional thief. One's a mental disorder, one's a profession. Still illegal, but different.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 04:07 PM
3

Automation is stealing jobs.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 04:03 PM
5

It's much more likely that she and Epstein were both victimized as children, IMO. Either way you're right that it doesn't excuse their behavior.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 04:32 PM
0

The Fresh Prince too, although that wasn't in a club.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:47 PM
9

Don't wanna hear about your body issues bucko.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 03:33 AM
2

I think the causal relationship goes the other way tbh.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 09:23 PM
13

Initiating sexual intercourse without consent is not similar to rape AT ALL? No, you're the one making the extraordinary claim here.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:56 PM
5

Wall of 100 dicks (sfw)
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:55 PM
24

No, it's actually pretty apt. An erection is not a conscious response. In fact, unlike an orgasm, an erection can be triggered by completely non-sexual stimulation. Anything that triggers a testosterone rush, including strong fear, anger, or disgust, can cause an erection.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:52 PM
12

You'd have to ask a doctor for a thorough answer, it doesn't come with a user manual. But it's something to do with hormone cycles. Waking up with one, or getting one while trying to stay awake in a boring situation, are common.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:42 PM
2

That "spectrum" is not a bell curve, and most people are at the extreme ends. "Just reinforce your gayness" is no better than "Pray the gay away".
/r/MensRights22/07/21 03:40 PM
51

And implemented a sitewide filter to remove any links to news articles about said individual because they knew about it and were trying to cover it up.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 08:57 PM
-1

The question was directed at OP, who claimed there was (hence the quotes).
/r/MensRights14/06/21 07:55 PM
1

The CDC noted that the increase in suicide attempts did not equate to more deaths. The suicide rate among young persons aged 15-24 from the third quarter of 2019 and the third quarter of 2020 "saw no significant change." Where's the "spike of successful suicides by teen boys"?
/r/MensRights14/06/21 06:05 PM
2

I'm not going to not send them there because the uniform policy makes me roll my eyes. It's a double negative. I'm not going to not send them there
/r/MensRights01/06/21 04:54 PM
14

Who said anything about him being a victim? Was the @nero Twitter account known to belong to Milo Yiannopoulos, or was it not?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:25 PM
4

That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it. "The Narcissist's Prayer"
/r/MensRights20/05/21 04:57 PM
42

The original idea was that the check mark would confirm that Twitter had verified that the Twitter account was run by who they claim to be, rather than someone posing as a celebrity. But then they removed Milo Yiannopoulos's verification because they disagreed with his politics, and no-names who have no reason to be verified started getting verification, most of them posting radical leftist takes like in the OP. So now it's pretty universally considered to have nothing to do with identity verifi…
/r/MensRights20/05/21 04:54 PM
3

I'm not gonna dig through Reddit to find old comments, but I've seen it in /r/femradebates and /r/egalitarian, might have even been here. I was just trying to offer a potential explanation for the previous commenter's verbiage.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 09:14 PM
24

"I want him to look like his dad" is commonly cited as a reason, I think that's what they meant.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:09 PM
9

No one said 50/50. Even if we were to take the 91/9 statistic uncritically, that still makes a 100/0 split extremely unjust.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 03:56 PM
3

He wouldn't have gotten prison, this was a civil suit because apparently you can file civil suits for certain criminal allegations in Indiana. She paid money and made a public apology, which is likely what he would have had to do for her if she won.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 09:08 PM
25

A doctor in the employ of the state. A state which literally is voting on removal of the equal rights provision from its state constitution, in this current election. Nope, nothing wrong with the state.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 04:51 PM
12

Yeah. Sure. The reason one of the largest newspapers in the world is publishing apologia for her is because no one supports her. Okay.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 03:37 PM
5

Unfortunately it's somewhat difficult to interview people who recently committed suicide.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 01:13 AM
1

The woman in the picture is following the rules properly - she left her mouth, eyes, and nose locked in a drawer.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 01:58 PM
4

Stop raping infants and household pets for a second and think about it.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 10:11 PM
4

Fuck this, fuck that, fuck me, fuck you. Fuck everybody here and everybody else too. Fuck off, fuckface, fuck all night long. Fuck everyone everywhere, and fuck this comment.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:34 PM
5

If anything, the teenage girl should be charged with distributing child pornography in the first place. This also happens and is just as fucked up.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:32 PM
7

The 13-year-old’s parents went to the media to accuse Edgecombe of grooming after they found the police did not take it very seriously.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 07:59 PM
37

Well, good for them. In the US, it's illegal for a woman to rape a boy... But she can still go after him for child support, even if she's convicted.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 05:27 PM
2

I guess because the shotgun passenger had longer legs than the driver. But really, who knows?
/r/MensRights19/01/20 11:13 PM
6

Sounds like there were 3 rows of 2 seats. She said she was between the guy in front and the guy in back.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 08:54 PM
2

Prison terms can be reduced; it's a way to encourage good behavior in prison. You can't just throw everyone in there and leave them to their own devices, then the guys who should be getting out after a couple years would never survive that long. So, "You'll die in prison" is the default sentence, and if he's on his absolute best behavior, just a perfect angel, convinces every other prisoner to dedicate their lives to charitable work, etc., then he'll serve 30 years. By the way, if that confused …
/r/MensRights06/01/20 09:04 PM
1

I prefer rebranding "toxic masculinity" as "internalized misandry" - it's less confrontational (and thus more likely to be listened to) but has a similar effect.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:20 PM
5

A very rich guy with a grudge against Gawker. They outed him as a closed gay man, when they published the article he was in a place where homosexuality is a capital offense.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 11:50 PM
3

Look at the positive ones.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 07:11 PM
22

we (men) This is the problem - men aren't a monolithic entity, nor are women. There is no "we men" in power, there's a miniscule subset of people who belong to the uppermost social classes who are in power, many of whom are men. But they don't give a shit about men in general, only themselves. The problem isn't that men are in power. The problem is that people point to the men in power, say "See? You did this to yourselves, men!" and use them as an excuse to ignore (or support) the oppression of…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:44 PM
3

The foreskin contains more of the nerve endings related to sexual pleasure than the rest of the penis combined. The glans has mostly pain receptors. It's also not meant to be exposed to outside air most of the time; it's protected by a mucous membrane contained under the foreskin. When the foreskin is removed, that membrane dries up.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:38 PM
1

Yes, but I mean in the context of this post.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:33 PM
4

Men own the world! Who said that?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 09:56 PM
1

Well good. You read all the way to the end of my three- sentence "wall of text". Maybe if you ever decide to be part of the solution instead of the problem, you can reflect on it. In the meantime, thanks for confirming my initial impression that you'd rather be a smug asshole than help educate someone.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 07:53 PM
1

What exactly? That's not even remotely true. You should read up on the history of this in America before acting like you know. I have a masters degree in biology and worked in medicine for about a decade. Want to talk about this and learn? Or, would you rather just hold on to demonstrably ignorant opinions? Or, more specifically: That's not even remotely true. (By the way, that sentence is false. He accurately described a very commonly used justification for circumcision; his statement is, at th…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 07:08 PM
8

I am Jack's complete lack of citations. By the way, gouging out your eyes prevents myopia, farsightedness, glaucoma, and cataracts. You gonna give that a try?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 04:55 PM
25

Even if it was, so what? What's your threshold for acceptable casualties from a cosmetic surgery performed without consent of the patient? I'd argue that once is too common, and twice is far too common. By the way, for another famous case, look up David Reimer. His story is fucked up for different reasons, but it also started with a botched circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 04:50 PM
3

Want to talk about this and learn? Or, would you rather just hold on to demonstrably ignorant opinions? Do you want to talk about this and teach? Or, would you rather just shame people about being ignorant? The attitude in your comment is not how you change minds. Most people who are neutral or pro-circumcision are coming from a position of ignorance, not hatred, and meeting them with hostility won't win them over.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 04:36 PM
26

Perfect Kafka trap. If he blames himself, then she did it in self-defense. If he doesn't blame himself, then he's not the victim, because victims blame themselves.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:47 PM
10

Is there a r/BlackPeopleTwitter? Welcome to Reddit! Is this your first day here? /r/BlackPeopleTwitter came first.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 03:58 PM
1

She's attacking him because he's defending creepy women. Like it or not, this is something straight men are prone to do. I didn't see anything about race, which suggests you're reading things into it that aren't there.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:47 PM
1

She's saying that a man's chest and a woman's chest are both equally sexual. Look at the fucking link she posted, and the text she put on the link, and link those together. Stealth edit: Yeah I'm a straight man and I think it's creepy too. But I would come to the same conclusion she did. A lot of men have trouble acknowledging that there are male erogenous zones other than the genitals.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:13 PM
2

You say something that agrees with her and then tell her to fuck off. I think you're missing something.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:03 PM
3

Click "crosspost", next to "report" on the OP.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:50 PM
1

I don't think you can see what I'm saying. Clawing your own face off at every opportunity is not "losing social capability in a society based around being sociable". Loss of social capability is far from the only downside of autism, and saying "some on the spectrum have a hard time around fluorescent lights" is like saying "some legally blind people have a hard time reading street signs" - sensory processing problems are often debilitatingly severe.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:44 PM
1

As someone who's also on the spectrum, "it's not even a bad thing to be autistic" is one of my pet peeves. There are some upsides, especially when working in fields like CS, but "there are benefits" isn't the same as "it's not a bad thing". This psychiatrist states it better than I can.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:30 PM
3

It does leave the question of how many underage girls are married to underage boys, and vice versa, compared to a child married to an adult.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:18 PM
3

In the case of a forced marriage, it's entirely possible for only one side to be forced.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:17 PM
1

Those aren't the only things that distress autistic people though. There are a lot of symptoms (and comorbid conditions) of autism that have nothing to do with interpersonal communication.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:14 PM
2

I've never heard of netball before. Looking it up, it looks like basketball, except the players are restricted to certain areas depending on role, and there's no backboard? Interesting.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 02:46 PM
3

Here's the TLDR version for those 3: Mordhau: The devs said they wouldn't ban players for offensive speech (they're a small team, the game sold way better than expected, and they don't have the staff to police it) and suggested other players just mute them. They also were contemplating adding more races and female playable characters to the game, and speculated that they might make the female characters an optional feature for those worried about historical accuracy. This was reported as "Mordha…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:05 PM
3

I'm pretty sure they're just trying to preempt some accusation saying they're anti-Muslim, or anti-Christian, or both, given AC's themes.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 05:48 PM
3

I like that saying too. I never heard it before though.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 07:32 PM
6

Your man-skirt is older than my country, I think that counts as traditional.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 05:34 PM
2

I think if it's fake, then it's even more ridiculous, to be honest.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 04:09 PM
1

I only heard it from my wife, I don't follow Twitter drama or the Biebs. But apparently it was a stunt to promote his new album.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 03:32 PM
1

It's radioactive and turns green when angered?
/r/MensRights27/06/19 02:42 PM
1

Didn't those turn out to be fake?
/r/MensRights27/06/19 02:42 PM
5

Now I don't know how to vote your post.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:07 PM
3

Shame.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:50 PM
7

Is the sequel titled Go Sip a Watchman?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:46 PM
3

Schlonger Georg is outlier adn should not be counted
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:45 AM
13

the maximum of 11 months (blame the law, not the judge) The judge dismissed the more serious charge with a 10-year maximum sentence, as part of a plea deal. Imma blame the judge.
/r/PussyPass19/04/19 07:08 PM
1

Tip 100%. You'll get VIP service next time you visit the restaurant.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 05:00 PM
11

And eyes were a religious symbol in ancient Egypt.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 12:29 AM
30

The girl’s father is upset with the decision to allow Elmarie Simons parole Typical patriarchial male entitlement. SMH. Thinks just because a woman let his daughter die a slow and horrifying death he has the right to control her body.
/r/PussyPass21/02/19 08:26 PM
5

Again... If he broke furniture over her head, and she said "it's fine, we made up", would you let it go? Of course it's more complicated than we're making it out to be. The answer is never as simple as "just report it". And I can understand being afraid of not being taken seriously. But I'd say you should try to convince him to go to the police, he's probably afraid he won't be taken seriously and having a witness might help. If nothing else, you might feel less guilty about not taking it to pol…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 04:37 PM
2

/r/asablackman
/r/MensRights12/02/19 10:54 PM
5

Guess kid #6 is coming then.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 03:11 PM
5

Do you go outside Obviously not.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 07:08 PM
1

Exactly. I think removing immigration quotas is more important than building a wall, but even so, Trump's statement is far more defensible than Gillette's.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 10:35 PM
2

When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people. How many of the people who think this was a good ad also support building the wall?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 07:59 PM
12

The only thing they wouldn't have done 40 years ago is stop kicking while he was still breathing.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:20 PM
2

You think "I'd let him spit in my mouth" isn't?
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:51 PM
7

I hear hit women make 77 cents for every dollar hitmen make!
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:50 PM
3

Your definition of tautology is off. A tautology is repeating yourself using different phrasing - "The sky is blue, the color of azure", or a statement that is necessarily true and therefore pointless - "The sky is the color of sky."
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:55 AM
3

I don't have an adblocker and I didn't see any survey.
/r/PussyPass20/12/18 11:04 PM
36

F
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:47 PM
5

whoosh
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:54 PM
13

(X) Doubt
/r/MensRights12/12/18 06:22 PM
14

White men do vote for them. That's the only demographic where Hillary got more votes than Barack.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:46 PM
1

Why would I use a screenshot to show the name of a subreddit?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 09:39 PM
2

There's no pride in being an MRA, they're a disgusting group of misogynistic, self loathing cunts who want to blame literally anyone but themselves for their problems. You can advocate for men's rights without going MRA, they are a group now, an identity. Every misandrist on Reddit. In fact, I think it's in the sidebar of r-againstmensrights. Also, "incel" was a self-applied label before it was an insult. It also originally referred to involuntarily celibate women, and was coined by one. (Back t…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 09:39 PM
4

I agree but can this sub please be the one place where "incel" isn't used as a cheap insult?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 06:48 PM
7

She's already been transferred to a much better position.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 06:46 PM
7

Except that the gender pay gap theory is "women make less than men for the same work, because of discrimination", which this disproves.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 08:47 PM
8

May I refer you to the title of this post? "Women earn less because"
/r/MensRights25/11/18 07:47 PM
4

No one claimed the gap was non-existent. Conclusion from my findings? You had enough time to write multiple paragraphs, but didn't bother to read OP's single-line title.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 05:52 PM
4

These results suggest that some policies that increase workplace flexibility, like shift swapping, can reduce the gender earnings gap and disproportionately increase the well-being of female workers. Last sentence of the abstract.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 05:48 PM
2

I'm glad you have an open mind. Ironically, it was seeing this same sort of vitriol in feminist spaces which brought me into MRA spaces in the first place, which is why I'm confident saying that I know how you feel, and I don't like it. Best of luck to you and your boyfriend. (By the way, I was circumcised too, and like your boyfriend's parents, I know mine would never have intentionally harmed me. So I'm with you on that too.)
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:43 AM
2

What's better: talking someone out of mutilating genitals or letting them know you hate them?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:26 AM
1

You don't change someone's mind by downvoting them when they came to discuss the topic in good faith. It just makes us look like insensate zealots, and people don't generally like to associate with insensate zealots.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 11:20 PM
2

I'm not sorry you got downvoted.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 05:00 AM
6

Thanks, I hadn't heard of this before.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 07:10 PM
10

The majority of pain nerves in the penis are in the glans. The vast majority of pleasure nerves are in the foreskin. Circumcision was popularized in the US by a religious extremist, anti-masturbation advocate.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 07:01 PM
1

I'm sorry that you got downvoted for engaging in discussion in good faith. What the fuck, guys?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 06:58 PM
5

is circumcised but has been restoring for two years, Wait what? How does that even work?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 06:57 PM
3

It was taken over by literal white supremacists when /r/altright was banned. Apparently, sometime after that, it was taken from them. I don't know if the new mods are SJW or not.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 09:28 PM
2

Did a single Reddit comment short-circuit your brain? Do you smell toast right now?
/r/MensRights01/11/18 05:04 PM
4

"Primates diverged from mammals" is a factually incorrect statement. "Primates diverged from other mammals" is a factually correct statement. A single word short-circuited your sentence, not my brain. Oh, by the way, autism is definitely not a high. If anything it's more like a "bad trip" which never ends.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:53 PM
4

...Or you could Google the word "other".
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:47 PM
1

First sentence of the Wikipedia article: "A primate is a mammal..."
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:35 PM
2

Primates diverged from mammals WTF? Primates are mammals.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:21 PM
9

I'm sorry to hear that. Not surprised though.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 11:15 PM
1

Yeah, it's not in my part of the country, but he's clearly in the US. For some reason, I thought Publix was a British chain. Obviously I was very wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 06:00 PM
1

I'm way off base. I thought it was a UK chain. I stand corrected.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 05:54 PM
31

My sister used to work at a preschool that would not allow her male coworkers to change diapers at all, for fear of such accusations.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 05:53 PM
1

I don't think we have Publix in the US...
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 05:45 PM
1

Someone made a few Chrome plugins to swap race/gender pronouns and adjectives a while back.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:00 PM
17

/r/whiteknighting
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 01:46 PM
1

Even the guy who coined the term used the word "primary", So did I. L2R. which means that your use of the word "exclusively" is just wrong. Which is why I said "exclusive or primary". But just for fun, let's consider the following: An adult male who is exclusively attracted to beautiful adult women may enjoy sexual interaction with his own hand. His predominant preference is women, he would prefer to have sex with attractive women whenever he's in the mood to have sex, but sometimes, because tha…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/18 04:32 PM
1

WHO: "A persistent or a predominant preference for sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children." DSM-V: "sexual focus on children" Krafft-Ebing (who coined the term in 1896): The individual is tainted [by heredity] (hereditär belastete) The subject's primary attraction is to children, rather than adults. The acts committed by the subject are typically not intercourse, but rather involve inappropriate touching or manipulating the child into performing an act on the subject.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/18 03:56 PM
1

I'm talking about the word pedophilia, which was coined in the 1800s. I don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/18 01:21 PM
4

So you don't know what "not" means. Don't worry, when you get to second grade they'll probably cover that.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/18 05:40 PM
6

Non-exclusive pedophilia has been introduced in more recent decades, but the common usage (and original definition) refers to exclusive or primary pedophilia.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/18 02:49 PM
27

So... Not wanting someone their own age. Do you know what "not" means?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/18 02:14 PM
35

Pedophiles don't want someone their own age. That's what pedophile means.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/18 02:09 PM
2

Nonetheless real. And not the only instance of food causing odors in sweat, just the most extreme.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/18 07:27 PM
0

If your sweat is drying from the heat faster than you can produce it, you're severely dehydrated. You'll have larger pit stains in humid environments than deserts, but they won't smell any worse. Source: grew up in Phoenix, joined the Navy, saw the world. (Turns out it's mostly water.)
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/18 06:34 PM
2

Says the guy who's not heard of trimethylaminuria.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/18 06:28 PM
3

It's the same gene that determines if your earwax is flaky and dry, or waxy.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/18 06:25 PM
0

Oh, but it was. We have a man who claims to be a "strict constitutionalist" but has repeatedly wiped his ass with the 4th Amendment, and that just got ignored because everyone was too busy talking about whether or not he kept an accurate calendar in high school.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 06:14 PM
1

We're so paralyzed about the thought that a women might be unjustly penalized You're completely ignoring my point. Let me spell it out for you as succinctly as possible: WOMEN WILL NOT ADMIT TO FALSE ACCUSATIONS IF THEY KNOW THEY WILL GO TO JAIL. THIS MEANS THE FALSELY ACCUSED WILL STAY IN JAIL.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 02:54 PM
1

If there were punishment for her, and she knew it, she would not have made a false rape accusation in the first place. That's why rape, murder and theft never happen, right? I agree that patting rape accusers on the back doesn't work, but giving them an incentive to never ever admit that they lied is not going to help the falsely accused. At the least, if there is a punishment for false accusations, there needs to be significant leniency if the accuser admits to lying.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:59 PM
2

The problem is, if there were such punishment for her, she probably would have never come forward and he would still be in jail today.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:15 PM
4

Downvotes please!! k
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:31 PM
97

She got a warning for the coaching. She got dinged for her tantrum over the warning, iirc. (Including breaking a racket and verbally abusing the ref.)
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:19 PM
2

Friendzone specifically refers to a one-sided sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:54 PM
1

I dunno, man, friendzoning can be emotionally taxing on both sides of the relationship (speaking as someone who's been on both sides).
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:21 PM
20

I prefer to whack my head on the desk before I start writing. It gives the comment a more consistent tone.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 08:06 PM
38

Just keep her away from any young boys.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 03:42 PM
3

You don't get shot by a gun, you get hit with a bullet. Anyway, if you want to be pedantic, it was a bolt, not an arrow.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 03:28 PM
3

You must be willfully misinterpreting my words. Just like you pretended you thought that little girl said yes when you knew she meant no. Hard proof is for legal settings. That's why laws (ideally) draw a hard line. There is proof that she committed statutory rape. Ethical issues of sexual coercion often don't have hard lines. They have grey areas. This includes stuff like how many drinks the other person had, or whether or not you're in a position of power over them. I think that Asia is wrong …
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:03 PM
4

A 5-year-old girl is actually capable of giving consent by your definition. But we know that it is psychologically harmful. And apparently you think that "guilty until proven innocent" is the standard which should be followed, since you asked (repeatedly) how to prove someone didn't have nonconsensual sex. I can't prove that you didn't have sex with a toddler. Please report to the nearest police station and turn yourself in.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:25 PM
4

You can't. But you can know for sure that a 17-year-old is not, legally, in a position to consent.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:02 PM
5

Age, power differential, use of intoxicants to remove inhibition. She held a position of power over a young boy, used it to groom him sexually, and couldn't wait until his 18th birthday, when it would be legal (although still not ethical) to jump his bone. Plus, she got him drink beforehand, which is another crime on top of the fact that it makes it even more rapey. By her own description, just the first part (using a position of power to coerce sex) is rape. The rest of it makes it that much wo…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:29 PM
9

Yes, I am telling you that. Especially when he's been groomed since age 12 by a person more than twice his age.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:43 PM
5

When they had sex? 17. When their relationship began? 12.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:31 PM
7

It is their actual name.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:26 PM
4

I’d also say female fragility too. They are scared that a man would have pleasure, oh, that can’t happen, or god forbid, Work! Their “honor” is on the line. Pretty fucking absurd You got the genders wrong, we're talking about the form of genital mutilation which is legal. Fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 10:42 PM
8

These YouTube pranks are getting out of hand.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 10:36 PM
1

I'm not trying to claim that the 43% statistic is accurate. I'm just speculating about how someone might have come to that number, working from different data from yours.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 07:14 PM
3

If 50% of marriages end up in a divorce, and even 1% of these marriages happen before or after a young son is involved, then any young boy has a >50% chance of being raised by both parents. That's not how statistics work. Say you have 2000 married couples. 800 of them have a son. 400 of them get divorced without ever having a son. 200 of them raise their son to age 18, then get divorced. 400 of them divorce when the son is young. In this model, 50% of marriages end in divorce. 60% of those marri…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:12 PM
1

If they used the commonly - cited "Half of all marriages end in divorce" then, along with your #3 that would give a number close to 43%. Also, that 17.8% is only for children whose parents do not live near each other. So if we ignored #2 (not everyone considers step-parents to be real family), and #4 (a 5% difference per your source), and assume "raised by a single mother" doesn't mean sole custody with no visitations... It's possible that 43% might be about right.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 03:19 PM
1

Not necessarily. You just have to assume that the chances of divorce are equal whether or not children are involved. That seems unlikely, though.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 03:06 PM
20

Self-identifying as a man and having others identify you as a man are two very different experiences.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 07:49 PM
7

Well, that's basically the idea behind tort law...
/r/MensRights07/08/18 03:12 PM
2

Sorry, I'm not familiar with the HUH. Which country uses that currency?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 04:50 PM
1

I'm in a nice area of California (among the most expensive in the US), and my townhouse cost less than half that. It's not perfect, but more than adequate for me and my wife. We also couldn't afford it if we weren't both working. I can't imagine how luxurious her life was beforehand, if this is the result of "multiple downgrades".
/r/MensRights26/07/18 02:55 PM
2

Yeah, but that's AUD, in USD that's about $3.50.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 02:49 PM
1

That happens basically any time American health care is even tangentially referenced on Reddit. Also, the ones interviewed in the film were psychiatrists according to the article. In the US, a psychiatrist specializes in medication whereas a psychologist specializes in therapy, so there may be some differences in terms.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:32 PM
12

Well, French psychologists also say that autism is caused by lack of maternal affection. So I don't expect much from them.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 11:07 PM
21

The girl took a cheap shot, he replied appropriately.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 02:48 AM
4

The metaphorical inside. I know everyone's literal insides are disgusting but that's not what we're talking about here.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 05:30 PM
7

Well, you can tell from the article... Not bad on the outside, irredeemably disgusting on the inside.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:32 PM
8

Not sure if you're joking but... The machete didn't go inside him. She used it to coerce him to have sex with her.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:29 PM
0

None of those are rear windows. And he definitely didn't have a ring on.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/18 03:27 AM
27

have always been*
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:32 PM
-16

His hand had some scrapes from broken glass but no broken bones or noticeable bruising. Newton's Third Law says he didn't hit it with that much force.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/18 10:02 PM
-2

Had a guy accidentally punch out mine. It was parked, he was texting on a bicycle, hit my parked car, and his hand went through the window.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/18 09:39 PM
5

The EU.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:44 PM
6

If it's splashing that much you need to adjust the flow rate.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/18 11:52 PM
1

Save the post Open browser Go to saved posts Click post Give gold Probably. I use the official app... Which also doesn't seem to have a "give gold" option.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/18 11:47 PM
0

Isn't it still in beta?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/18 06:46 PM
33

The Handicapper General needs to install land mines in woman-dominated workplaces.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:51 PM
38

idiots No, she knows exactly what she's doing.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:50 PM
5

DARVO
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/18 03:49 PM
184

In the US at least, yes. You can be forced to pay your convicted rapist for 18 years because "it's for the child".
/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:47 PM
2

How do you use a bass in martial arts?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/18 06:03 PM
495

You're right, this is even worse.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:15 PM
7

I sexually identify as a nihilist.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/18 12:41 AM
-3

Eh, he cucked her twice. He was asking for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/18 06:36 PM
2

Not familiar with count dankula, He's the Scottish YouTuber who was convicted for teaching his girlfriend's pug a Nazi salute. Article 1 Article 2
/r/MensRights24/03/18 10:31 PM
50

Hmm. So it's okay to misgender someone in their Wikipedia article as long as it makes the shooter look like a straight white male.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:27 PM
1

we made WHAT exactly work with the moon? The round-trip vehicle. Mars is a dead end. there is no magnetosphere to hold the atmosphere together (to simplify grossly). Simplifying grossly rarely gets you the full picture. There are a lot of very smart people who disagree, and, more importantly, they're not asking you or me to foot the bill directly. Their work is also making LEO space launches, which are definitely useful, more efficient and affordable.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/18 11:18 PM
1

We made it work with the moon. If you're saying it's impossible, that's easy to disprove. If you said it's not worth the effort... That's a much more defensible argument, but I (and Mr. Musk) would still disagree.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/18 11:04 PM
1

Musk looks a lot more like Ballmer than Gates. Gates was good with computer software but wanted to make money; Ballmer was good with money (and people) but wanted to make computer software. Musk's background is not in aerospace - he made his millions on the Internet, as he mentions in the tweet - but he has extreme enthusiasm for the industry, and uses that to motivate both employees and investors, much like Ballmer.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/18 10:47 PM
2

Microsoft dominated the market and made a lot of money. But that doesn't mean they were in it for the money. (Well, not all of them. I'm sure green is Bill Gates's favorite color, but that's why he was in charge of business-y stuff.) They had a lot of very talented engineers, and even their managers were clearly passionate about computers. They were good at making money, but they chose to make money with computers because they liked computers a lot. Watch any old clips of Steve Ballmer and tell …
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/18 10:10 PM
1

A lot of modern manufacturing, particularly nano-scale, requires a vacuum or near-vacuum to work. An extremely low-density atmosphere would make that much easier to maintain. Naturally there would be downsides for the comfort and safety of humans involved in the process, but having a whole warehouse effortlessly maintained at near-vacuum would raise some possibilities. Robots can perform far more complex tasks with a human operator, at our current level of AI development. However, the lag in tra…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/18 09:19 PM
1

He wouldn't be the first, though. Ever heard of a little company called Boeing? Or Lockheed Martin? McDonnell Douglas?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/18 08:04 PM
1

We built our entire civilization in the first place from a much weaker vantage point, in terms of both knowledge and genetics. So arguably the answer is yes. We don't know what we could get from Mars other than a lot of open space and the survival benefits of decentralization - but if you assume the odds of an apocalyptic event are anything more than absolute zero, then it seems better to have a replacement planet and not need it, than to need one and not have it. Also, we could find something q…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/18 08:00 PM
4

Mars is a phallic planet. If he wasn't such a misogynistic piece of shit, he'd be trying to get us to Venus.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/18 07:31 PM
0

I'm so sorry your elementary school teachers did such a poor job teaching you to read. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:23 PM
0

Nope. To flee from the term is to give it power, and I refuse to give it power. Protecting women is masculine behavior. Shielding people from the consequences of their bad behavior is toxic. Protecting women from the consequences of their bad behavior is toxic masculinity, in the most literal sense, and that doesn't change no matter how perverse and hateful the phrase's common usage is.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 02:14 PM
3

There's a reason I didn't actually use the term.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:25 AM
15

Man rule #1: If your girlfriend whoops your a$$, tell your crew you got into a drunken bar fight. And never, ever, run to the police! Oh, look. Masculinity that is actually toxic. If anyone who ever used the term "toxic masculinity" showed any indication of caring about this sort of thing, I might believe them when they said "feminism helps men too".
/r/MensRights13/03/18 08:48 PM
1

I recall seeing it as of about 3 years ago in B-W. I had to triple-check I didn't have the sign's translation wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/18 04:24 PM
40

There was a study in Australia that found that, when resumes had all indications of gender removed, women were less likely to get an interview. In other words, the Australian government's hiring discriminates against men. So they shut it down and called it sexist.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:14 PM
4

Only if you've posted there before.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/18 03:57 AM
1

That's funny, because Western Asia used "Oriental" to refer to themselves, from my experience in Arabic countries.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:24 PM
4

It's literally labeled as an x-post.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/18 04:21 PM
10

To be fair, that's how the guy's lawyer labeled it.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/18 04:58 PM
37

women who defied gender norms by being more assertive and dominant men acted assertive and warm — in general, not considered the norm for male behavior So assertiveness is not a male or female trait? Are only trigender pyrofoxes naturally assertive?
/r/MensRights24/02/18 04:31 PM
1

Yeah, if you were intentionally doing anything to distract or annoy someone currently trying to save my life, I'd consider that equal to attacking me. Paramedic work requires some degree of attention and focus, and even if it didn't, she's still being a fuckwit. Also, you can't drive safely with a note stuck on your windshield. So she did actually obstruct somebody.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/18 12:14 AM
1

You missed the part where she went out to verbally harass a paramedic in the middle of doing his job?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/18 11:56 PM
1

That's basically the computer equivalent of a curse.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/18 11:55 PM
7

I doubt it. Seems more like pulling a /r/menkampf.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/18 06:59 PM
54

A werman is someone who turns into a man every full moon, right?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:35 PM
1

The Mel Gibson Defense!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/18 11:10 PM
0

One side supports ethnically homogenous states (the same that non-white separatist groups like Nation of Islam supports) and has miniscule and continuously decreasing numbers, the other promotes infantilization of women and discrimination against men, opposes basic human rights such as due process for men, and has major political influence across the developed world. I have not seen white supremacists do significant damage with their dumb rhetoric, but I've sure as hell seen feminists do.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/18 08:47 PM
1

How can you shoot women and children?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:39 PM
5

Or is the penis wearing him?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:38 PM
7

Ironically, having more fresh young male vets would decrease this "wage gap".
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/18 04:29 PM
3

None of the above. If that's not an option, I'll choose the one which doesn't oppose free speech, since it's a fundamental requirement for free society. So either way, the radfems go.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/18 04:27 PM
3

"It seems they care more about money than they do about... getting equal opportunities.” Only it's literally the opposite of that. Truth means nothing to these people.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/18 04:15 PM
1

Apparently it's made of Toxic Masculinity which seeps through mattresses and causes sad, angry, regressive divorced men to turn into smiling female models. Sounds like a good deal to me.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:26 PM
22

Gravity?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/18 10:05 PM
10

Ironic... He could save others from run-on sentences, but not himself.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:49 PM
7

Like this.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 09:26 PM
2

Passez-moi le café Java.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:11 AM
2

#PassezMoiLePorc
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:50 PM
7

A source
/r/MensRights22/12/17 11:19 PM
5

Studies have shown that adjusting the radio is worse. So yeah.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/17 10:20 PM
1

"Innocent" doesn't mean blameless I'd advise you to purchase a dictionary, but I'm tired of feeding the trolls.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:58 PM
2

I don't believe that "everyone charged with anything is guilty." I never said that. Let's review the transcripts, bailiff. There are lots of actions that aren't criminal, but warrant ostracizing. Being charged with a violent crime is one of those. You said that "being charged" is an "action" which "warrants" a punishment. Or, in other words, that anyone who has been charged deserves punishment. Do you claim that innocent people deserve to be punished? Second, no one is 'proven innocent,' in the …
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:31 PM
5

Rather, you are required to prove the relevance of the messages in private before you can submit them as evidence. You should prove their relevance in private after they are submitted as evidence. That's the whole point of evidence.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:16 PM
4

There are lots of actions that aren't criminal, but warrant ostracizing. Being charged with a violent crime is one of those. So you believe that everyone charged with anything is guilty, even after being proven innocent. I sincerely hope you're falsely accused of rape someday. I would say that no one deserves that, but you're the exception.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:11 PM
-4

Oh dear lordy, someone upvoted a joke to the front page! Surely there's a deep and significant meaning behind this unusual event!
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:38 PM
9

British. Not even once.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:44 PM
2

Which would rather defeat the whole point of having a secret ballot behind a curtain in the absence of a whip-wielding male slave-master, but never you mind such piffling details. But what if a man asks her how she voted? It is a well known fact that women lack the mental faculty to lie, which is why false rape claims don't ever happen.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 03:43 PM
6

What? Of course you would. Right next to his last name, home address and a sentence about how great it is that the only daylight he'll ever see again is through bars.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 09:51 PM
5

Or in front of. No need to be picky.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 10:12 PM
5

shame.gif
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/17 09:17 PM
4

I still cry when I remember the story about the guy let a homeless woman stay in his house out of compassion and then was accused of rape and kicked out of his own home and worst of all, his mother died believing the accusation. Source?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/17 03:43 PM
1

I can't imagine Arya as a leader though, even if she was offered the job.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:57 PM
6

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:16 PM
2

There's also a princess-regent in the North.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:15 PM
10

The only way for him to get full custody and keep the child away from the mother would be for him to have his rapist legally convicted of rape or sexual assault (and even then, there's no guarantee) OP even mentioned that - rape victims in her state being forced to pay CS to their rapists.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 09:15 PM
3

Probably Tim Hunt.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:35 PM
3

This is the British system though.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:32 PM
1

Ethan Couch?
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:28 PM
7

Why wouldn't there be? I mean, there are over a billion people in India.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:34 PM
3

So it's okay to unjustly fuck over one guy, as long as it prevents everyone else from being mildly inconvenienced.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 08:33 PM
1

Family court, where "no backsies" is the letter of the law.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 08:29 PM
17

So... A foreigner, complaining about too many foreigners. Troll harder next time.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 03:32 PM
3

Brock was a rape victim. His BAC was 0.171%; no way he could consent. That vicious unconscious woman violently sexually assaulted him.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/17 11:02 PM
23

So no.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/17 10:55 PM
29

The Google "manifesto" fiasco. Guy said "we should hire based on ability and support diversity of thought, rather than hitting based on skin color." Someone forwarded his internal memo to Gizmodo, they wrote the typical Gawker hit piece about it, he got fired.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:47 PM
4

Not sure if the context but if it's the recent downfall of Uber Hint: You're wrong. The context is available in the screenshot; try again.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:43 PM
2

Judging by your choice of words in this comment, you probably deserved it.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:14 PM
1

Is that, like, the non-alcoholic version of a spirit animal?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:13 PM
2

The study also ranks sustained harrassment by gender, and reports that men experience it slightly more. So, women who experience harrassment are more likely to experience sustained harrassment, but women are still less likely to experience sustained harrassment than men.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:12 PM
9

Even the police thought of nothing since I was physically not hurt much except for a concussion. Just a little brain damage, walk it off. Seriously though, that sucks and I'm sorry to hear that happened to you, dude.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:55 AM
1

The Googles.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:09 AM
6

...But alimony is tax-deductible.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 09:25 PM
2

The post was about sex robots for men.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:18 PM
1

That's not exactly the recommended strategy. Seems she had a bail of $3 mil cash, or $9 mil bond. They didn't want her free. I think it's more likely the state wanted to delay the trial to negotiate a plea... Since that's a thing prosecutors are known for doing.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:48 PM
0

So she can (try to) pay for a mini trial, where she's guilty until proven innocent, but if that doesn't work she gets two years in jail before even getting a real trial? That's still fucked up. I mean, I agree that she looks guilty as hell. But it also looks (to me, as an outsider to the legal system) like the prosecution was gaming the system - hold her for a while, then offer her a plea bargain with a lesser sentence that just happens to be barely longer than the time she's already been locked…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 04:48 PM
21

It's also fucked up that someone can spend 27 months in jail without a conviction, though.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 04:12 PM
5

If "the law" is a Miranda warning, it is.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 04:08 PM
1

I reported a sub that had a moderator post explicitly saying that inviting violence was approved activity for the sub. (Which is actually against Reddit rules, not just one interpretation of "community guidelines" like this) Admins message me to say it had been "taken care of". The post was deleted, and the moderator who posted it was still a mod. It's okay when they do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 01:53 PM
1

AutoAdministrator
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 01:49 PM
7

When you did what you did, you not only hurt (the ex-spouse), The damage you have done goes far beyond the 19 days (the ex-spouse) spent in jail for a crime he didn’t commit It has to be known when you falsely accuse someone of something to the police, that has a ramification, not just the ramification to that person One day went by. Two days went by. A week went by. Nineteen days went by knowing an innocent man was in jail. Check out all those footnotes. Why did the judge spend so much time on …
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/17 07:27 PM
15

Or... Or! Hear me out here! You could actually read the article.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/17 05:39 PM
21

And being assaulted.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:15 PM
1

www.pornhub.com
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:11 PM
8

As a fucking sperg I demand that you take back that comparison.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:04 PM
7

It was about basic women's rights, while simultaneously campaigning to deny basic rights to men. They wanted universal suffrage specifically for women (at a time when universal suffrage for men wasn't a thing) and a universal draft for men.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 03:47 PM
40

Such a person should not be allowed to enter a profession such as medicine Seriously... This person should not be allowed around knives and other humans, much less as part of their daily employment.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 09:41 PM
5

Rationality and egalitarianism in a HuffPo article? What timeline did I jump to?
/r/MensRights11/05/17 06:15 PM
3

Because men have to sign up for SS for any of those, and women don't.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:52 PM
2

Great taste in movies. :) Yours is the more generous interpretation of this, and probably the intended one. The problem is: As I said, the quote is given completely devoid of context, and thus can't be expected to be interpreted as a TV quote. As anyone in this sub will tell you, there are people, especially on modern college campuses, who could say that with a straight face and not mean "no uterus, no opinion on the uterus". Moreover, it's quite doubtful that they would be willing to extend the…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 02:19 PM
8

If one were to determine what attributes the Jews share with a beast, it would be that of the rat. Defaming a group of people with an out of context quite from a fictional character is still offensive. I did my own 10 second search and found something I doubt would get approved as a poster.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:42 PM
2

And further down the same page...
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:25 PM
1

More like /r/ShitCommiesSay.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 02:57 PM
1

Yeah! Tiny steel-toed boots for all! Vote VicisSubsisto 2020!
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:02 AM
1

You shouldn't read Reddit while driving, dude.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 03:46 AM
2

TL;DR: It's all evil capitalism's fault that men get sucked dry for child support and alimony. Stalinist slave labor is the only true path to equal rights for men. Or something.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 03:44 AM
5

That guy did have a recording though, still 3 months in lockup.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:38 AM
133

Self-defense that doesn't work unless it's a surprise is not good self-defense.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:28 AM
18

Did you ever hear the Tragedy of Darth Jones the SJW?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:26 PM
2

Did you just post your real name here?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:13 PM
13

My uranium reactor, my castle.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 12:19 AM
54

/r/keming
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:19 AM
4

What does "eradigate" mean?
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:18 AM
15

It's designed to protect the state. If he stood paying child support, her need for governmental assistance increases. This guy's barely old enough to drink, if that. He's a child himself, at least according to laws about college financial aid and health insurance dependencies. And he's being victimized. How many teen fathers do you know with $15 grand to spare?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 03:52 PM
6

Franz Kafka is dead, and his continuous turning powers a courtroom near you.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 03:45 PM
8

Have you told anyone? That's a shitty thing to let someone get away with...
/r/MensRights19/01/17 12:35 AM
3

This is Reddit, not a court. Everything here is hearsay.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 12:30 AM
3

If we could expect everyone to act reasonably we wouldn't need laws. Also where I grew up, a 16-year-old could sleep with a 17-year-old and the 16-year-old would be technically guilty of statutory rape. Many US states don't consider the age of the "offender".
/r/MensRights19/01/17 12:27 AM
5

So my 3.288 is actually low. You got 3.337. so that actually confirms what I said. Forcing a woman to give birth is wrong. Indentured servitude is also wrong. The former is a sacred value people are not allowed to discuss in anything other than absolutes; the latter is something that gets completely ignored by people arguing against financial abortion.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 07:07 PM
14

Having to pay a fixed amount to someone else for decades is why many men choose, or remain in, these dangerous jobs. Do you really think financial obligations have no bearing on employment decisions?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:53 PM
10

If you work for 18 years, your chance of dying is (chance of dying at work in a year) * 18. This is also not taking into account the fact that men comprise the vast majority of workplace fatalities (92%) with a minor majority (53%) of the total workforce, or the fatality rate for abortions (0.6 per 100,000, admittedly minor but nonzero). So my 3.288 is actually low.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:25 PM
8

What does any of the content of this comment have to do with mine?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:17 PM
38

So should forcing the man to carry it to adulthood. The odds of dying from a work related accident in a year are 3.38 in 100,000. The odds of a woman dying in childbirth are 18.5 in 100,000. If we multiply the former by 18 years, the man is 3.288 times more likely to die "cutting a check once a month"than the woman is giving birth.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:04 PM
836

So the Nigerians are the ones getting their money stolen online now? What a twist!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/16 04:25 PM
2

Here's a fun fact for you: "Sometimes" is not good enough to base laws on! "Sometimes" the police get the right guy based on a hunch; that doesn't mean we should get rid of trials.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:59 AM
2

I already covered the fact that you did not cover that, because your argument only works if you specifically and deliberately ignore it.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 08:39 PM
2

An actual reason not to feel safe is that you're near a guy who looks kinda like a guy who raped you 10 years ago. That's not something you have a right to be protected against. If you observe an actual reason that you are objectively unsafe, then you have a cause for action. It has nothing to do with feelings. Feelings are inherently subjective.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:53 PM
2

Cognitive distortion is a feature of the human psyche, just as having a minimum number of heads is. You can't reasonably ignore it. Thus, ignoring false insecurity is not reasonable. Thus, it is not reasonable to conflate feeling safe with being safe.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 08:10 AM
3

This thread has been generally referring to the US, though. Solidly first-world.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:01 AM
4

Ignoring false insecurity, feeling safe is the same thing as being safe. Ignoring my pink skin and my lack of a second head, I'm a two-headed green man. Society should arrive to make people actually safe, but this has nothing to do with what some people perceive as safety, because cognitive distortions are a very real thing that shouldn't be ignored. This is why an ideal society should not be governed by feelings.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:43 PM
15

To the average first world citizen, on a statistically significant level? No.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:32 PM
2

Yeah, but it's an officially unrecognized one. And he does get the shit kicked out of him (and his memory destroyed)...
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/16 07:14 AM
5

Never saw it, but the books were decent if formulaic, and it has Biri-Biri.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/16 06:31 PM
9

He also punches a lot of guys... and gets the shit kicked out of him constantly by both genders. Basically aside from his right hand, he's the only one without superpowers in a literal city full of superhumans.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/16 05:59 PM
3

Then you junction Ultima x99 to it and never heal so you can Limit Break each turn.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/16 05:54 PM
5

To think we live in a society where one will never be needed again is easy based on common trends. War is becoming more and more mechanized, and the US military is so overmanned that they regularly kick people out who want to stay in, despite a long and demoralizing series of conflicts in the Middle East. If we ever end up in full scale war again, and don't end up nuking each other into oblivion right away... We'd need more drone manufacturers than ground troops, and ground troops are really the…
/r/PussyPass01/12/16 11:22 PM
9

Equality by means of eliminating the draft altogether is better than equality by means of subjecting women to it.
/r/PussyPass01/12/16 04:31 PM
1

No, they're sending 19 year old COD players.
/r/PussyPass01/12/16 04:28 PM
2

As someone who was a victim of (same-gender) bullying as a child, I have no problem with it. "Zero-tolerance" policies for fighting work as well as "Gun-free zones" - that is, they don't. All that means is that the bullies, who know how and when to initiate a fight without being seen by the teachers, have free reign over the other kids.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:59 PM
1

How about dealing with shit so the bullying victims don't have to get violent, then? Bullies know how not to get caught by teachers. When I was in elementary, a handful of students, including myself, approached a teacher about a (violent) bully notorious throughout the student body, and her response was "You don't know him. He's really a great student in class." Okay, so that gives him the right to pound everyone's faces into the dirt.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:48 PM
1

I think you make a great point here. I (male) consider badly acted porn to be just as laughably unattractive as badly written erotica, but can enjoy either if it's well made and oriented to my tastes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 03:49 PM
3

IT IS NOT JUST FUCKING CHILD ABUSE FFS You didn't say "not just" you said "not".
/r/PussyPass21/11/16 09:44 PM
2

...Including child abuse. Yeah, I thought on it. Not coming up with a way that this child wasn't abused.
/r/PussyPass21/11/16 08:38 PM
2

this is not child abuse it is sexual assault You just said sexual assault of a minor is not child abuse. Think on that.
/r/PussyPass21/11/16 08:11 PM
4

At least we won't see another child abuse victim paying child support here...
/r/PussyPass17/11/16 04:14 PM
4

Men and women are different = if boys are doing worse in school it's their own fault. Men and women are different = a 14 year old girl who hooks up with a teacher is a victim, but a 14 year old boy who hooks up with a teacher is "lucky". Men and women are different = a woman has the right to choose if she wants a child, but a man does not. Men and women are different = you don't hit girls, no matter what, no matter how many times they hit you. This list also goes on. The MRM boils down to "stop …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:41 PM
1

This shit has been happening for a century. They won't learn.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:35 PM
2

Perhaps. Bear spray is designed to aerosolize, which would theoretically make it dissipate more quickly.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 02:41 AM
3

It appears to be a very common misconception. Don't feel too bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 12:11 AM
5

Stream OC gives off fumes over a fair area, too. Not going to incapacitate anyone but it's not pleasant. Source: Worked as a self-defense instructor in the Navy. Had people with faces covered in pepper spray punch me while I held a practice cushion.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 12:00 AM
3

This is a common misconception based on the way that bear spray and pepper spray are labeled. Bear spray is regulated based on capsaicin and related capsaicinoid (CRC) content; pepper spray is labeled based on oleoresin capsicum (OC) content. OC is the pepper oil (usually from cayenne peppers) which contains CRC. A 10% OC solution can be as low as 0.18% CRC. Military/police grade pepper spray is generally 10% OC. Bear spray is 1-2% CRC. Doing the math, that makes bear spray up to 10x stronger th…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 11:54 PM
2

Bear spray has a capsaicin and related capsaicinoid concentration of 1-2%. OC is just the pepper plant derivative which contains CRC. Myth: The more Oleoresin of Capsicum the better, or the thicker the better. Fact: Oleoresin of Capsicum (OC) is simply the oil that contains the Capsaicin and related Capsaicinoids. More Oleoresin of Capsicum (oil) requires more solvent to produce the fine atomized cloud. This reduces space in the can for propellant and may reduce the spray duration and distance. …
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 11:44 PM
3

If you're defending others, you don't have to retreat. Especially if those others are unable to retreat. In many places, but not all, you also do not have to retreat if you're in your own home. (That's what's called "Castle Doctrine".)
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/16 11:23 PM
1

Technically you have the URL in a watermark in your picture. (I shouldn't have put the "possibly".)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 07:49 PM
3

More where that (possibly) came from
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 07:21 PM
17

You forgot that /s... I hope.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/16 01:24 AM
2

If this is sexual assault, then so was that. They're both unexpected kisses given by someone celebrating in the heart of the moment. That's my point; he didn't sexually assault the nurse, and she didn't sexually assault the ring girl.
/r/PussyPass05/11/16 12:22 AM
7

http://memory.loc.gov/diglib/vhp/story/loc.natlib.afc2001001.42863/transcript?ID=sr0001
/r/PussyPass04/11/16 12:02 AM
3

Also, it's not like you can't improve your attractiveness. Just being a familiar face improves your looks, and there's nutrition/exercise and style guides everywhere. Learning how to light up people's reward centers just for talking to you, goes a long way too. None of this is something you learn by having someone react to you uncomfortably. In fact, the first step to practicing, as I've always heard it, is to learn to ignore the negative feedback.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 11:11 PM
7

He'll learn that what he did wrong was approaching a woman who found him unattractive. This is not helpful feedback.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 10:09 PM
-7

It's one of the most iconic images in American history, and it's pretty much the same thing (worse, really, since he grabbed her, whereas the ring girl put her arm around the fighter first). The subjects of that picture are complete strangers.
/r/PussyPass03/11/16 09:18 PM
-11

Death Row you say?
/r/PussyPass03/11/16 08:55 PM
6

Close - that was the argument against religious exemptions. Is this author forgetting that whole demo of women who don't take it for sex related reasons at all? Yes... "forgetting".
/r/MensRights02/11/16 05:24 PM
5

I for one am looking forward to the Knight Rider/Sherlock crossover.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 05:14 PM
1

I think there's a difference between "having a stripper at your bachelor(ette) party" and "going to a strip club" (or even "going to someone else's party where there's a stripper"). I've gone to strip clubs a couple times with coworkers after I started dating my wife - in both cases, I made sure to get her permission beforehand. She's never mentioned the option of going to a male strip club, but if it was the same "girls' night out" context, I'd be fine with it. I suppose I would be more uncomfo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 10:40 PM
1

We think men look fine without make up, I think OP is an excellent example of why this isn't true. We consider it socially unacceptable for men to wear makeup (actors excepted) but we don't think men look "fine" without it, we consider the average man to be well below "average" in appearance. (Just to clarify, I agree with your thesis that women should quit makeup; my wife doesn't wear it, nor do most women I've found to be attractive.)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 11:00 PM
2

you need to be unpleasant and/or unhygienic All of those things make you "unpleasant"; the first listed criterion for an ASD diagnosis basically summarizes down to "comes off as boorish" in nicer words, and the disabled and obese have difficulties with hygiene that others don't face, for what I think are fairly obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 08:42 PM
1

If you are able to prove your case, it shouldn't be denied because you introduced it wrong. "That's what we've been saying all along!" - The NSA
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:31 PM
20

The fact that it's not his biological kid is not relevant here at all. The court is doing the right thing by treating this as any other family case. HE LOST VISITATION RIGHTS AFTER THE DNA TEST. This is not "treating this as any other family case."
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:16 AM
596

Atkins attempted to act as his own attorney during a court hearing four years after the DNA test results came back. This decision proved costly for Atkins who was reportedly unable to get the judge to accept the DNA report because he did not follow the proper rules for introducing evidence. Lesson learned: Do not act as your own attorney. Ever. Unless you're actually an attorney.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:14 AM
1

If they murder somebody, know that murder is wrong, tell others that murder is bad, and feel no remorse, then they're a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 08:19 PM
1

So you do believe that remorse does not exist. Let me break it down simply: If someone says murder is bad, and then commits murder, he is a hypocrite. If someone commits murder, and then says "Yes, murder is usually bad, but it's okay when I do it." then he is a hypocrite. If someone says "It's none of your business who I may or may not have murdered, therefore I have a right to lie about it." then he is a hypocrite. If someone commits murder, and then says "Murder is bad, and I did a bad thing.…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 06:41 PM
1

So you're saying that "hypocrisy is the cultural method through which human values are spread" is supposed to sound absurd?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 05:07 PM
2

it is "hypocrisy" for a murderer to tell his children murder is wrong, right? If the murderer avoids punishment for murder, does not feel remorse for murder, and/or plans to murder again, then yes. Otherwise, definitely not. Do you really believe that remorse does not exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 04:25 PM
1

Handful of M&Ms, anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 04:15 PM
3

Shaming pedophilia prevents pedophiles from seeking treatment. That's not the sort of "wonder" to be proud of.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 03:59 PM
1

Fair enough I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 08:32 PM
1

Surprise! Most people aren't 100% straight. Surprise! Most people don't fit into the category being discussed. (Which I just said. I don't know how it was supposed to surprise me.)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 05:25 PM
1

If you would choose to have sex with someone of the same gender, outside of external coercion/rewards, you are not "straightest of the straight" (0 on the Kinsey scale). Whether there are more male Kinsey 0s than female is another issue entirely. I personally think that there's plenty of evidence that that is the case, but that just means there are fewer straight women than straight men, not that there are equal numbers of each but straight women aren't straight. Also, I've definitely known wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 05:12 PM
1

If you are not attracted to women at all (which is the baseline assumption in this thread), I would assume you would enjoy a sexual interaction with an unattractive man more than with a woman. Also, there's more to heterosexual sex than simple penetration. Or at least there can (and should) be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 04:44 PM
1

Rather than the one you're less likely to need to defend yourself against, and more likely to enjoy?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 03:48 PM
1

I'm much more equipped to fight off a rabid dog than a tiger. That doesn't mean I'm going to go play with stray dogs instead of going to the zoo, because the tigers in their cages are much less likely to attack me than a stray dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:55 PM
2

Fair 'nuff. For reference, mkay?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:49 PM
1

If an unattractive guy gets told he's going to have sex with a hot girl, he probably expects to have to bring his "A" game to increase the odds of it happening again. Whether that involves PiV is, theoretically, up to the girl, assuming she is capable of communicating her desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:34 PM
1

I'm not referring to your final conclusion, I'm referring to your statements about being less afraid of women, given that gay women are statistically more prone to violence against women than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:16 PM
1

She said "less fear she'll be harsh" and "not if I'll have to see him again, or he's scary or threatening" which implies those wouldn't be concerns with a woman. If you know of statistics on intimate partner violence related to one-night stands, divided into the same categories based on sexual orientation, I'd be interested in seeing them, particularly if they differ. But I haven't seen any such studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:10 PM
2

I disagree with both Red Pill and Blue Pill, and I like South Park quotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 02:03 PM
3

Im very good at having sex, less good at getting sex. It all comes back to not being autistic. Gotta disagree there. I've historically been terrible at getting sex, mainly because of autism, but from what my wife says I'm quite good at having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 09:30 PM
2

Expensive, capable of refusing service and serious about protection. Most "johns" I've known personally have solicited prostitutes not out of desperation, but for convenience and the most straightforward sexual encounter possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 06:04 PM
1

As a guy I agree with you. If you're going to be imagining someone else anyway, why not go with your own hand or something artificial and save the effort?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 05:57 PM
1

If he's ugly enough, then how'd he get those hypothetical STDs?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 05:54 PM
1

Except that's what the girls here seem to be saying, too. "Lesbians have all kinds of variety; heterosexual sex is literally strictly PiV."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 05:53 PM
2

Considering lesbians commit DV at higher rates than men, why would you be less afraid of sleeping with an unattractive woman? Sounds like WaW to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 05:48 PM
8

Objection. Hearsay.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:31 PM
-1

Pfft. Saying "That new movie that came out last week really bombed at the box office" will get you in trouble in an airport.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/16 12:25 PM
2

These ones had 3, apparently.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:50 PM
1

Paper Street Soap Company uses only 100% recycled ingredients! I don't think they're interested in freshly harvested supply.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:48 PM
2

were allowed to steal a kiss while attending an official meeting outside of prison just five months into their sentence. It is understood the pair, who are both in separate prisons, were allowed out for personal meetings. A spokesman from the Scottish Prison Service told the Mail Online: 'Prisoners attend a variety of different meetings as required by the parole board and children's panels and other such bodies.' This isn't (wasn't supposed to be, anyway) a kissy-time break. They were out for me…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:47 PM
15

That's the proper way to break down a door. Especially if you don't know what's on the other side... Like if the building's on fire.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:23 PM
27

Yeah... Because "They won't do anything" is just as bad as "They will arrest me"...
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:44 PM
3

Men used to be laughed at for those things, too. That part never changed.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 10:50 PM
2

If I were to imagine what OP's sister is like it would be Chris Tucker in drag, reading a script that just says [Stage direction: Be an asshole.]
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/16 10:41 PM
12

Oh shit. Did you account for that in your previous comment? You sure as fuck didn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/16 10:36 PM
2

Yeah, it reads like a long-form KenM comment.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:46 AM
2

1) If any man so wishes to honor the fallen, then he too shall be seen with his dick out.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/16 01:59 AM
7

With such mass, I think a black hole would be more likely.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/16 12:43 AM
1

Blacked out is not the same as passed out. I worked with a guy, who once recovered from a blackout state to find himself en route to a strange woman's hotel room. Granted, apparently in this case he was okay with it, but men doing things (or doing people) they wouldn't do sober is also something we keep talking about. Not that "people are talking about it" is proof that something is true. Or do you believe Salem really had a witch problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 02:39 PM
6

Do I need to pull this out again? Those 'horrific rapes and murders' you see in the news have nothing to do with your bullet points. You're clearly not "more aware now than ever." Attitudes like yours are what enable people like Brock Turner. The idea that "Oh, he's such a good boy, he just had a bit much to drink!" Rapists know what they're doing. They know that it's wrong. They like that it's wrong. Do you have children? Do you teach them about "Stranger Danger"? Or do you try to tell the rest…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 04:34 AM
2

Can't say I'm aware of any sort of similar "Friends don't let friends commit rape" efforts. And from what I can tell it seems men still egg each other on about taking advantage of drunk girls and remain bystanders. Quick Google search.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 04:18 AM
1

Is it rape if a woman fucks a blacked-out man? Should he pay for 18 years as a result?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 04:06 AM
2

Federally, yes, but there are a lot of things that are illegal on a state level but legal federally. Also, most of the world is not under the US government's jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 08:00 AM
23

In some jurisdictions men don't have that right.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 11:44 PM
5

The only wasted vote is a vote for a candidate you don't want.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 06:04 AM
1

Just don't boil a goat in its mother's milk.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/16 05:55 AM
1

Who said that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 11:28 PM
9

You're right, Justin. Throughout history The Patriarchy has conspired to exclude women from the venerated human traditions of starvation and homelessness. There is no way that we can claim that women are equal to men until we get them out of the shelters and food lines and onto the highway onramps, which have been dominated by cishet white males for far too long! It's time to smash the glass floor!
/r/MensRights28/08/16 10:41 PM
7

Why buy the cow when you can steal the milk for free?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:45 PM
1

And it's the same thing here, which is why I have to agree with the author's conclusion (the law needs to go) although I disagree with her reasoning (she thinks it would be okay if the law only applied to white men).
/r/PussyPass16/08/16 05:14 PM
1

Although I disagree with the author's training, I wonder how this is different from "affirmative consent" laws. How do you prove that something was said prior to the sexual encounter?
/r/PussyPass16/08/16 04:01 PM
3

And you're being downvoted for saying the same things we say, but for different reasons and "as a feminist." GOOD JOB GUYS.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:54 PM
6

It's 2-0-1-2.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:51 PM
1

It also reverses the function of the buttons themselves.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 05:40 AM
2

Huh? What does /r/Me_IRL have to do with this?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 05:37 AM
1

When did societal support for an alleged victim and castigating the alleged perpetrator become mutually inclusive? When the allegation was made. If she hasn't named a name, go ahead, give her the benefit of the doubt. If you are talking to her, and no one else, and you have nothing to do with the criminal proceedings (or college proceedings, or anything that has any impact on the accused, ever) then hell yes, assume she's telling the truth. But in a criminal case, the accused is innocent until p…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 02:33 AM
3

I keep hearing that there are no true Scotsmen though...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 03:25 AM
7

The technical term is "Women Are Wonderful".
/r/MensRights03/08/16 05:59 PM
13

We don't have a rape culture, we have a "rape culture!" culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 09:38 PM
2

De Freitas had seen his daughter’s mental health spiral out of control with the stress of a forthcoming trial, and had questions as to why the CPS saw fit to pursue a young woman suffering from bipolar disorder through a trial during which details of her sexual history would be made public. Yeah, it's terrible to think of someone being put on trial, and having their sexual history dragged in front of the public eye! Let's ignore the fact that the only reason she's in this mess is because she int…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 07:00 PM
2

It didn't "stick" here, it just took a long time to wipe off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 04:10 PM
7

Your reply is far more opaque and jargon-ridden (and only partly because it's an unfocused, rambling screed). /u/cxj used simple, relatively common words in the English language and stated his point in 2 short sentences. I'm still not sure what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 12:27 PM
-1

Wow, that guy's hard to feel sorry for, though.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 03:25 AM
2

The privileged lads at Camp Lejeune got both!
/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:01 PM
2

My in-laws had to fight to get equal legal custody of my wife when she was a kid, even though they had both agreed to it. It's ridiculous. Your idea makes a hell of a lot of sense, although I sadly have a hard time believing that many people would opt-in to it like you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 03:24 PM
1

Incorrect. AutoModerator can be configured to automatically hide posts from a given user without notification. If I hadn't leaked my username to my wife, I'd have never found out.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:52 PM
25

At least you got a notification. I got shadowbanned from there for arguing that, if a drunk girl aggressively sexually accosts a guy, such that he's not even initiating anything, that doesn't make the guy a rapist. (In this particular story, the actual coitus never even happened.)
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:50 PM
1

That I don't know. Although there is a study that indicates testosterone treatments increase empathy in adult women (linked towards the bottom of that article I linked) which is interesting.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 06:23 PM
4

Testosterone also has a retarding effect on emotional and social development in boys and is closely linked to autism (where the infant receives too much in the womb). Not true. There was a very loose correlation found in one study, which has been contradicted by other studies. As an autistic male with a high (>1) 2D:4D ratio, I figured I had to point this out.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 05:33 PM
5

Oh, so that's their source for claiming misandry isn't real. All of the misandrists seem to really want to turn into lesbians.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 04:19 PM
7

Certainly explains why feminists like it.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 04:18 PM
1

Decrying the acts of violence while acknowledging religious motivation is actually a good first step. The problem is that there seem to be far fewer mainstream Muslims willing to do so than, say, Christians decrying abortion clinic bombers or Westboro Baptist's actions.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 04:12 PM
12

Check your exothermic privilege.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 08:03 PM
2

Try /r/egalitarianism or /r/femradebates fit a more balanced view.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:14 PM
5

Well, technically...
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:42 AM
1

Stonehenge.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:56 PM
1

I don't think he would have appreciated "shitty" either.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:53 PM
1

and yet no one wants to take the stance necessary to do so. "No one" is a bit strong. From the comments, even from the fact that this link was posted and has a positive score, it looks like there are plenty of us.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:31 PM
13

Who destroyed the family structure? Women Feminists. FTFY
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:25 PM
2

Note: there may be politics/MR, race/MR or LGBT/MR topics that do directly affect men and are therefore not covered by this description - not all multi-topic discussions are "off-topic" or peripherally related.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:23 PM
1

Not all women are like that. I hate to quote something that's never not used as a joke here, but it is true. My situation is very different from yours (wife and I are both happily CF, our combined income is less than yours alone, we knew each other for close to a decade before we started dating) so I can't offer you any pertinent advice, but... being cautious and giving up entirely are two different things. The world needs more fathers who actually want to be fathers, you do yourself and your hy…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:20 PM
12

It's just Matriarchy backfiring.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:09 PM
3

http://redpanels.com/comics/sexual-consent-comic.png
/r/MensRights08/05/16 02:58 PM
2

Funny, that ceiling doesn't look like glass to me.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:08 AM
10

There are a fair number of female abuse victims who are MRAs.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/16 02:42 PM
2

Officers became suspicious when Mirza named her attacker as a man from Perth, who was actually in jail at the time the alleged offences took place
/r/MensRights01/05/16 05:00 AM
16

How about the fact that the story headline reports her claims as truth, even when they (eventually) admit there's no evidence for them?
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:00 PM
4

She won't be able to reach you when you're in prison.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:02 PM
9

So "toxic masculinity" comes from toxic women. Makes sense.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 04:19 PM
9

Okay, my original reply was poorly worded and came off as hostile when I didn't intend it as such. Let me try again. "I myself do not have a child, but I, too, felt sick reading this. I believe that any human capable of empathy would." I will not dispute or in any way attempt to diminish your paternal protective instinct. (BTW I wasn't the one who downvoted you. Your reply was an entirely appropriate one for how you read my comment.)
/r/PussyPass20/04/16 06:57 PM
8

But the rest of the world, especially her two sons, need her in prison.
/r/PussyPass20/04/16 03:02 PM
25

Having a child is not a prerequisite for that feeling.
/r/PussyPass20/04/16 02:59 PM
1

It's official: England is better than Canada.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/16 02:38 PM
5

The man has a point.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/16 02:35 PM
1

See? Women are still denied basic rights to this very day! /s
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:16 PM
1

There's lots of man-love there.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:57 PM
4

If the group claims to represent them, they should be represented within the group. The fact that they have lost this proves your statement wrong.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:56 AM
5

No no no, they're perpetrating heterophobic violence in the form of nega-rape.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:52 AM
7

Since Dolezal.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:48 AM
12

Which is especially ironic given Japan's history. And your choice of the word "bummer." *snicker*
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:47 AM
2

LB(w)(m)T(f)
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:42 AM
2

I must say, that's not very gentlemanly.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:41 AM
3

I hope the Wood Walled Men's Club brings the whiskey, stogies and sandos. That kinda show needs concessions.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:39 AM
8

If she asked him for sex, and coaxed him into it, she should go to jail. A law is a law. If you don't like it, change the laws. In this case, the law disagrees with the way you yourself say it should work. "A female child under the age of 17 years shall not be guilty of an offence under this Act by reason only of her engaging in an act of sexual intercourse." So... back at you, I guess.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:24 PM
1

Personally I blame Katie Dippold and Paul Feig. My distaste for this movie is gender-neutral.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 07:01 AM
1

I'm gonna tire you to the radiator, and I'm gonna grape you in the mouth!
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:25 PM
6

The infamous hacker 4Chan tricked them into revealing it with their #GiveYourMoneyToWomen hashtag.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:51 AM
7

But did you see what the human condition was wearing???
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:49 AM
3

So, what you're saying is... Don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:46 AM
2

If you could pay but won't the state pays and later seizes the money from you. Probably you'll get a fine, too. What happens if you refuse to pay the fine or fight the seizure?
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:41 AM
1

He lives on $36000 a year ($18000 after alimony-robbery). Moving is expensive.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:38 AM
1

Tell you what, post something interesting that actually backs your point and I'll respond. NO U You've acknowledged that the title was both clearly legible and grammatically correct, and (indirectly) that personal opinions are irrelevant to the debate. So basically, you've said that I'm right about everything here, just in the most hostile way possible. I can only conclude that either you're trolling, or there is a literal stick up your ass. So no, I'm not going to continue with the argument you…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:59 PM
1

And enough personal details that the pseudonyms were nearly worthless. As has already been stated.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:11 PM
1

Communication must work at both ends. Most people here understood it. This suggests that the problem is with you.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:07 PM
1

They were not interviewed for the Rolling Stone article.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:22 AM
1

It was grammatically correct, whatever your opinion.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:14 AM
1

Maybe you were. The headline makes sense.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:01 AM
1

I had a few good words to say about NOW a few days ago, about their support for requiring women to enroll in SS. I take them all back.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:47 AM
1

That only works if you're the one being interviewed.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:42 AM
1

Perhaps the most notable part of Conrad’s ruling is his dismissal of Coakley’s claim that her counseling sessions with Eramo and Emily Renda (another UVA employee) are protected by “patient-counselor privilege” The ruling applied to both, but she only tried to use this argument for communications with the university.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:36 AM
1

It's not for her communications with the magazine. It's for her communications with the university counselor.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:23 AM
4

I must admit I'm not familiar with UK sentencing guidelines. But a written law that says "the pussy shall be granted a pass" is still a pussy pass. Also, do you know what "stiletto heels" are named after? A tool literally designed for murder.
/r/PussyPass24/01/16 09:57 PM
14

She used lethal force (that heel was millimeters from his brain at most) to defend her friend from having potato chips dumped on her head (the horror). For that she got a suspended sentence and community service. That is a pussy pass.
/r/PussyPass21/01/16 01:08 AM
4

She broke off the heel in his eye, they're not in good condition.
/r/PussyPass21/01/16 01:05 AM
6

Shut the fuck up Ani.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:20 AM
3

Turk E. Baster, not Turk Turkleton.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/16 12:28 AM
5

Not just the FBI. Any military branch as well.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:11 AM
1

It worked for the Bolsheviks. But no, my solution to the takeover of one market segment is to abandon that market segment in favor of its more efficient competitors. No company worth working for will pass over a qualified candidate in favor of a less qualified one with a certificate in Basket Weaving.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 07:03 AM
8

It's the same as my answer to all the other problems with college: Go to a trade school. No one's going to change their ways while they have a comfortable monopoly. You want them to change, you gotta stop giving them your business.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:23 PM
4

So what she's saying is, he was asking for it? Does she want us to look at what he was wearing, too?
/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:16 AM
13

You're not paying much attention to this sub, then. Lot of SJW crusades in the news, especially on college campuses lately.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:14 PM
9

There was a FtM a while ago who did an AMA in this sub, he said the opposite. Going from being a slightly tall, masculine woman (socially approved) to a slightly short, androgynous man (socially disapproved), getting paid less after transition because "a single woman on her own needs the extra income"...
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:08 PM
3

Why did it take so far into this discussion for someone to actually link that damn blog post? I was about to do it myself...
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:59 PM
11

Are you me? Being a genderqueer hirsute giant kinda sucks.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:55 PM
2

Because she's British.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/15 04:22 PM
2

I don't get it, looks like the pussy pass was at least partially in effect here.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/15 04:10 PM
1

Violent thoughts emerge from these experiences, and during particularly abusive outbursts, he may detail the harm he wishes to cause to the people he calls “normal.” And if you object, you are part of the problem which needs to be solved. Well, that definitely sounds familiar.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 05:53 PM
0

Obviously they were not property because treating them as such was indictable. While breeding dogs is a legit profession and no crime. There is no comparison. Owning dogs and breeding dogs are both legal activities. Owning humans and breeding humans are both illegal activities. This woman owned and bred humans, which is why she's being charged with owning and breeding humans. They certainly did not rape each other because neither were capable of consent. Or would you have the male victim be the …
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:12 PM
1

Oh? You don't think it would be a travesty if she were found innocent? You're an incredibly terrible human being.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:01 PM
0

These were people not dogs or property so any comparison is non sequitur. They were property, they were slaves by any reasonable definition. Hence the charges of involuntary servitude, forced human labor and sex trafficking. The comparison to dogs is far more relevant than your "easy comparison" since the Manson family were willing participants. Besides, there's a separate term we have for conspiring to allow someone in your control to be raped... It's called sex trafficking. How about that?
/r/MensRights14/11/15 04:12 PM
9

If these people were dogs, what she did would be no different from what a dog breeder does. Shall we accuse purebred dog owners of bestiality for "participating" in the act of breeding, by coordinating it? I'm not saying that what she did is any better than rape. I'll say that again, just to be clear: What she did is no better than rape. But it is not rape. Because of this, if she had been charged with rape instead of sex trafficking, she would be found innocent. And that would be a travesty.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:59 PM
1

Well, to be fair, I do have distinct memories of myself and my cousins, of both genders, going to "Take Your Daughter to Work Day" when I was young. No petition necessary (that I knew of). So it's not like this doesn't swing both ways... although to be fair, 3rd-wave feminism was only in its infancy back then.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 05:09 PM
1

Or maybe they did the opposite? Having a "stuff boys like" event and a "stuff girls like" event, without explicitly stating it as "for boys" or "for girls" would make it more accessible to people who don't fit those generalized stereotypes, not less.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 05:07 PM
7

She didn't participate in the sex, technically according to the definition of rape, it's not. (Still at least as terrible as rape, but not rape.)
/r/MensRights13/11/15 04:25 PM
1

While I can accept that your first comments were merely misinformed and not disingenuous, the fact is that, especially without the context of your later comments (such as the one I'm replying to) the harsh accusations and strong language make you look like a concern troll. That is most likely why you got downvoted. Looking at the other comments here with negative scores, it is clear that, overall, your comment score here is not based on what side of the aisle you're on.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:45 PM
1

but that's not what I was implying. I was simply saying that you have good reason to be aware of how people might interpret it... No, you said OP was attempting to incite a personal hate campaign which is a far more severe accusation.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:03 PM
1

Focusing on whether someone is "with us" or "against us" is bound to lead to bullshit. That's exactly why the title is relevant. I've seen Rousey praised in this sub consistently for shutting down feminist rhetoric in interviews, that doesn't excuse her from this.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:57 PM
-15

I'd rather see feminazi invasions than people breaking the first rule. I can deal with feminazis (Psst... secret is to downvote, ignore, move on) but no-context videos of men punching women (usually with ALL-CAPS TITLES) just piss me off. If feminists spamming the "report" button is what led to those posts being better moderated, then wow, for once in my life they've done something useful.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 07:37 PM
2

What would happen to a man who slapped papers out of a cop's hand? Probably this: Instantly, the male and female deputies had her up against the wall, put handcuffs on her, and escorted her out of the intox room.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:09 PM
0

His job is not to "deliver justice." His job is to get people into jail. The defense attorney's job is to stop that. If he had been tasked with indicting the man accused of sexual assault here, this would be a conflict of interest, but that's not the case.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:08 PM
2

Women can do anything men can do. Except not be perfect.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:17 PM
186

It's funny how they find "teachers actively discriminate against boys" and still manage to come up with "oh poor girls, they have it so much harder."
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:29 PM
1

I made it to Atheon, never finished, tried to solo him at level 40, found my checkpoint was lost in the intervening year.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 09:58 PM
1

I'm subbed to it and /r/destinysherpa (can be quite annoying at work). Still doesn't work if I only have 30-60 minutes to play in a day, and don't know when I'll be online.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 06:33 PM
1

No, I'm still working towards 290. Haven't beat VoG or CE either. Partially since I don't have many friends on PS4 and don't have time to arrange a PUG usually; I have to solo anything without matchmaking.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 06:23 PM
1

I'd color code them but Reddit doesn't allow that.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 06:21 PM
1

He didn't state what it was not, his statement was just an open-ended negation. Because of this, his reference must be implied through context, which we get from what he is replying to. "Also worth noting that the character is transgender" is short for "It is also worth noting that the character is transgender." Thus, there is an "it" implied in the previous statement, and the "it" in "I think it's not" can be assumed to refer to that same "it," especially since the pronoun "it" is not typically…
/r/MensRights17/10/15 05:24 PM
1

I'm partial to PvE myself... Dick move of them to put out a Crucible-only test weapon during Iron Banner week. No way I'm gonna be the weak link with a 200 hand cannon in IB.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 04:44 PM
1

It also means you're impressively flexible.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 04:40 PM
5

He didn't call anyone an it. "I think it's not" is response to "also worth noting" is a shortened form of "I think it's not worth noting" where the "it" refers to the fact that the character is transgender, not to the character herself.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 04:36 PM
1

Just for the record, "Source: Jezebel commenters" is my way of saying "/s". Honestly if that's how this husband feels I don't blame him at all. A judge blamed him for his wife RAPING A CHILD, of course he'd be "at fault" in the divorce.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:27 PM
2

0 means 0, you e-rapist.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:00 PM
1

00000000
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:22 PM
2

Your attempt to force me into a binary gender role as though biological sex was real is extremely triggering.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:09 PM
5

Absolutely. After all, since wymyn are strong, brave, powerful creatures with absolutely no self-agency, it's the fault of their husbands and the patriarchial society that they decided to troll for some strange after making a lifelong pledge to not do exactly that.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:57 PM
1

While testosterone levels, which are on average higher in (adult) men than (adult) women, have a major impact on sex drive, meaning the idea that "men always want sex" has a basis in scientific fact (although it's not universal), this only reliably applies after sexual maturity. In the preteen/early teen years (since this article is from a place where the age of consent is 16, the boy was at most 15; the onset of puberty in boys is typically age 12 to 16, two years after the typical age for girl…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:44 PM
4

100% of men who are victims of unfaithful spouses are actually closet cuckold fetishists. Source: a couple subreddits AutoModerator won't let me mention, Jezebel commenters
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:16 PM
1

No, no it's not. Boys mature mentally, sexually and emotionally at a significantly slower rate than girls. The male brain doesn't reach full maturity until age 30, compared with 22 for the female brain. If anything, a scientifically-backed policy based on developmental age (which for the record I wouldn't support) should have a significantly older age of consent for boys than for girls. Boys are socially conditioned to act like they always want sex, because a man's worth in our society is measur…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 05:05 PM
4

Yeah, that's why middle schoolers are never ever afraid of standing up in class for any potentially embarrassing reasons...
/r/MensRights06/10/15 10:07 PM
-5

Priapsis means yes. Edit: FFS people! The /s was implied?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 10:04 PM
5

Yeah, those same numbers are in the PDF. Girls don't outnumber boys in the system by a long shot.
/r/PussyPass26/09/15 10:12 PM
1

He could have said "Siths deal in absolutes." More concise, snappier, lacking the hypocrisy of the actual statement.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:16 PM
4

She's too attractive to play a convincing pink-hair.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:25 PM
7

My favorite sci-fi hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:30 PM
13

So, like some kind of... Let's call it... Male circumcision? What would it be like to live in that world, I wonder...
/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:05 PM
9

Well, separate but equal is totally okay in the US right?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 05:31 AM
1

Well, ideally if she's rich she shouldn't be getting any child support. unless the mom's getting significant support from her family and friends. Most single moms I've known do get significant support from family and friends. Many don't have jobs themselves, either... and still use daycare. All that's just empirical though. The point is, the system financially encourages single mothers to refuse fathers visitation rights and to be under/unemployed, and places no stipulations that the money has t…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:34 PM
1

Child support goes to the guardian. Full stop. Whether it is spent on the kid, our half on the kid, or 10 percent on the kid and 90 percent on the guardian, the state doesn't care. That's what I mean.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:13 PM
3

Except child support doesn't go to the kid, and there are no legal requirements as to what the mother does with the money after she receives it. The answer is not in the name. "Child support" is alimony for mothers.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:30 PM
3

I was paraphrasing Debra Lafave's legal defense. https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/a-womans-touch-when-pedophiles-arent-men?utm_source=vicefbus
/r/MensRights22/08/15 10:15 PM
3

Better just have her phone in. We don't want to send a pretty young woman like that to such a horrible place, who knows what could happen to her?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 09:58 PM
2

The Wikipedia page has a few reference links.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:03 PM
9

So you're advocating in favor of discrimination in response to something that may be discrimination? Critical race theory/feminist theory in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:20 PM
8

Sometimes you run.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:07 PM
1

Being nice makes us look sympathetic. Being Paul makes them look sympathetic. We are at an inherent disadvantage on that front, we need to be better than them.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:38 AM
3

Yes I do. Literally none of what you just said changes the fact that, when someone wants to claim (as anti-MR types love to do) that MRAs are nothing but a petulant, entitled bunch driven by emotions and prone to tantrums, Paul Elam gives them a perfect poster child.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:11 AM
2

Ugh, so true. People like this do nothing but give anti-MR types a weak-man target to hate on.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:01 PM
2

And detaining Japanese-Americans wasn't near as bad as gassing Jews. Doesn't make it a good thing.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:00 PM
1

Eh, I'll let it pass. Assuming all of your enemies are conspiring is a feminist thing, I'm sure Biddle doesn't even know AMR exists.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:22 PM
1

If I were Sam Biddle it'd be tough for me to look in the mirror too.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:16 PM
4

Bah. Feminist cred is worth less than nothing. All it shows is that you're a soft target to slap around.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:11 PM
10

gawker of all people should not be willing to have the worst of the people they have be who represent them. They're proud to. Example: the author of this piece.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:48 AM
14

It's okay though, she was bored!
/r/PussyPass13/07/15 07:47 PM
5

Exactly. Whoever made the poster (most likely) didn't write the law, they're just giving men a warning. You can tell they're not a feminist because they acknowledge a rape accusation can ruin your life.
/r/PussyPass13/07/15 10:56 AM
0

Being a father is actually quite fun and rewarding, but the hard part about being a father in this century is having to take care of your ex. You don't need a vasectomy, you need counseling. You're letting your (understandable, don't get me wrong) fear of getting plowed up the tailpipe by the legal system get in the way of enjoying fatherhood and dating, and a vasectomy (which as others mentioned is not foolproof) is treating the symptom, not the cause. If you're absolutely sure you won't want a…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:04 PM
3

My curiosity has been overwhelmed by my refusal to give Upworthy any ad revenue.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:40 PM
1

+VICTIM SPEAKS AFTER ACCUSING INNOCENT MAN OF RAPE You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 12:21 AM
8

...Aaaaand she uses Twitter like a 16-year-old, too. Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 01:08 AM
3

Ooh, new sub!
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:02 AM
13

Only if you take a picture of the vomit and sell it.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:31 PM
1

There is none.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:17 PM
1

Where the hell do you live? In the US, which has one of the most open ended free speech laws in the world, libel and slander are still illegal, although the standard for proof is high.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:19 PM
1

I'm glad! I guess hanging out here has made me a bit pessimistic.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:36 PM
1

Did you stop reading at that line? It's libel.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:27 AM
1

Making a false accusation to the police is filling a false report. Making a false accusation in court is perjury. Making a false accusation in the press is libel. I don't see what your not getting here.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:45 PM
2

Good point, I missed that.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:02 AM
7

Surprisingly even-handed article. I like it. Of course, even though she acknowledges the "truth" of feminists' bloated rape statistics, I'm sure she'll get slammed as a rape apologist, but it's nice to see someone at least try to get a middle ground.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:47 PM
7

Literally every one of those is the same as a false rape accusation, if the accuser officially reports it to the police.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:44 PM
17

And they won, and no one, except maybe the two people who lost their jobs, seems to see the irony.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:27 AM
4

Exactly. And yet I constantly see PUAs/redpillers referred to as "MRAs." I've even seen Elliot Rodgers - the guy who killed multiple men for having more sex than him - referred to as an MRA.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 12:15 AM
5

I've never seen a feminist argue against "MRAs" without conflating MRAs/MRM and PUAs. I'd say it was a misunderstanding if it weren't so damn blatantly intentional.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:59 PM
1

Yeah, it's something they should really teach in school. I never learned anything about that stuff until I went to a class designed to teach ex-military how to job-hunt... Even then it was very brief.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 02:36 AM
1

There are a few, like this: http://www.artofmanliness.com/2011/12/15/dress-code/ No definitive one. It's also not a linear scale. You want something on the range from business casual to semi-formal for an interview, and black-tie and tuxedos should only be worn when there will be champagne and seating assignments (I'm simplifying here). Wearing a tuxedo to an interview would be sort of like what this woman did - you spent a lot of time trying to look good but it's the wrong outfit entirely.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:19 AM
1

Got the next month booked up for inpatient care... Can I telecommute?
/r/MensRights17/04/15 07:13 PM
6

"Sorry my shirt is ripped, I had to bandage up my own knife wound. Here's my résumé..."
/r/MensRights17/04/15 06:04 PM
1

The difference between what she wore and a T-shirt and jeans is the same as the difference between a tuxedo and a suit. And you NEVER wear a tuxedo to an interview or other business event.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:54 PM
13

These interview techniques don't work for every company. They will however work for every company worth working for.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:47 PM
5

That's true, technically a tuxedo is less formal than a business suit.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:45 PM
1

So it's okay to dangle candy in front of kids to have seed with them now? Brb buying a van
/r/PussyPass06/04/15 02:33 AM
2

This is something that both sides tend to dismiss, which is frustrating albeit predictable. MRAs tend to focus on rape accusations, thus missing the rapes which go unreported, and feminists make the faulty logical leap that convicting innocent men makes up for letting rapists go free. I've known rape victims and false accusation victims, and I wouldn't wish either situation on anyone.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 04:05 AM
3

Warren Farrell's Why Men Earn More. A thorough review from an ex-NOW member who realized that if women really made $0.70 for every $1 men made, any company which didn't hire only women would be driven out of the market due to overhead...
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:20 PM
2

The opposing team already possesses the balls, though.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:46 AM
3

No, Scientologists believe the aliens are evil, Raelians believe they're good.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:46 PM
1

I was confused there for a bit, then I realized autocorrect.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:12 PM
69

"I'm actually concerned about the low priority of education here. And by 'education' I mean 'free day care.'"
/r/MensRights27/01/15 04:51 PM
3

Society was wrong. and invited audience members to use them on her however they wished. Inviting them to do whatever they want is consent. If that consent is not revoked at any point, it's not rape, whether it's a woman or man.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:39 PM
0

Amen to that. While it is refreshing to see a feminist acknowledge that male-on-female rape is a thing that is possible, she chose a bad "victim."
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:33 PM
2

Link doesn't work.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:32 PM
0

Nope.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 02:43 PM
1

Unisex toilets are illegal in most of the US.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:31 PM
6

Except for the positivity, yes. It's like saying "Male scum."
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:30 PM
3

It just means the opposite of transgender.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:14 PM
1

Yeah, I'm not blaming the newspaper for not releasing her name (they still could have withheld his name). It's still a double standard.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:25 PM
235

Funny how even in the story that says she's guilty of blackmailing and false accusations, HER name is withheld but not HIS.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 05:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter