TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VikingPreacher Archive

View 0 posts and 119 comments by VikingPreacher on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So you're just straight up a primitivist? A cave man who rejects anything unnatural and lives purely by his instincts? No higher thought, just base animal desires?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 02:53 AM
1

It takes two to tango. You can't have most men being alone without most women also being alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:10 AM
1

How about just not allow said mutilation at all?
/r/MensRights29/11/21 09:19 PM
1

Good ol' Schrodinger's asshole
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:51 PM
1

No it doesn’t because you didn’t even bother to read the whole thing you cherry picked a verse and didn’t read the verses before it and true ones after it. For every single one you didn’t do that. Buddy, I read the whole book. I literally studied Islam curriculars and extracurricularly for close to a dozen years. On par of testimony the reasoning behind that is that when there are two women, women are more emotional or may be more forgiving in their testimony There ya go. Sexist nonsense. Making…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:10 PM
1

And people wonder why MRAs are known misogynists
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:01 PM
3

No, you ignored Sahih Hadiths, that's what you did. You ignored binding scriptures.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:22 PM
1

Those sources are highly contested in Islam They're literally Sahih Hadiths. and one part of the Quran doesn’t show whole story of what is being said But it does show the inequality. Islam as a whole has many rights for women And even more limitations. Overall, it's a step down for women's rights. Christian’s seems to be quite bad I agree. A lot of the time scholars have used the entire surah that extremists have cherry picked verses from to break down their argument for extremism thinking. So i…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:21 PM
1

But no need not to get offensive
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:39 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:28 PM
3

Islam made men and women different but equal Classic complementarianism. "Women are slaves of men, but are equal no seriously". Fucking apologist. Is shit like this equal? Women are mentally deficient:https://sunnah.com/bukhari:304 Women must be obedient or be beaten: Quran 4:34 Women have inferior testimonials: Quran 2:282 Women have an inferior aqqiqa: https://muflihun.com/ibnmajah/27/3163 Womek are not allowed to lead: https://sunnah.com/nasai:5388 Women have inferior atq: https://muflihun.co…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:25 PM
1

Islam on women: Women are mentally deficient:https://sunnah.com/bukhari:304 Women must be obedient or be beaten: Quran 4:34 Women have inferior testimonials: Quran 2:282 Women have an inferior aqqiqa: https://muflihun.com/ibnmajah/27/3163 Womek are not allowed to lead: https://sunnah.com/nasai:5388 Women have inferior atq: https://muflihun.com/tirmidhi:1547 Men are more perfect than women: https://sunnah.com/bukhari:3769 Husband's right is so extreme that if anyone were to prostrate to another i…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:24 PM
1

What about women not having rights because someones religion says so? This sub would probably love that kek
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:23 PM
1

Nobody has a problem with men being equal to women. That's not the point of this subreddit I take it you haven't seen this subreddit
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:12 PM
1

Possibly. All I'm seeing are contradictions
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:22 PM
0

And here you are talking about how I should stop being a collectivist over gender...
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:50 PM
1

it seems that "conservatives" are actually fair people. they want order, i.e., fairness. They also seem to be against meritocracy and individuality. Hence why they tend to want to force people into narrow boxes based on rather superficial aspects (in this case, gender). on a sidenote, it took me years to understand that the truly good people in my life never were leftists, but always "conservatives Funny thing, in my experience it was the other way around. they had reasonable opinions Don't you …
/r/MGTOW220/06/21 03:12 PM
1

So, how can you support equality of opportunity if you're also a traditionalist? That still confuses me
/r/MGTOW220/06/21 12:39 PM
1

I am not "against women working", I come to understand that it is actually not good for the fabric of society if traditional ways are abolished And those traditional ways tend to have a rather poor view of women's employment. And women as a whole. Traditionally, women didn't have the vote. Should that tradition not be abolished? Not so long time ago, a woman would have worked a little, then have children, then work again a little. Like this, she could contribute to family income It would also me…
/r/MGTOW215/06/21 01:12 PM
1

We get it, you're against women working
/r/MGTOW215/06/21 05:17 AM
1

Somehow, if a birth happens (as it is 3 out of 4 times), then the man is responsible for the consequences of the woman's decision. Well, he's responsible for their decision. It takes two to tango. Both him and her are responsible. Your separation of birth from pregnancy is hilarious. Do you even understand basic biology? Yes. I also understand the concept of bodily autonomy. Abortion is a matter of bodily autonomy, not parenthood. If you want to rant at someone, rant at nature for making pregnan…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:48 AM
1

This all seems to basically say that women are poorer than men. I'm not sure what you're drawing with this. For instantce, the first link you have looks only at disability as subsidies and nothing else. In the US, farmers receive massive subsidies, and most are men. Why wasn't that counted? Same with the military, which is massively male. Why the selectivity in subsidies?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:46 AM
1

Less than women though. The majority of stay at home parents are women. This does not change the fact that over their life times, women do not financially contribute to taxes, they only draw from them. Well, that study is very outdated, done at a time when housewives were far more common and thus were counted as a net negative. More and more women are working women nowadays though. Again, you're painting a false picture with the study. The study was not weighted to look at only earning women and…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:33 AM
1

Well, yeah, housewives are still pretty popular. And they don't get payed, even though they do labor. You're kinda drawing a false picture with your stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:25 AM
1

Good girl. Now explain why men should be legally responsible in a process they're not involved in? They're not. Men are not responsible in pregnancy or abortion. Parenthood is an entirely separate matter that both men and women are responsible in.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:24 AM
5

That depends on the individual women, no? Personally, I don't. I'm open about having a pretty meh sex drive. I'm more into cuddling and general intimacy than sex itself generally
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 11:01 PM
1

Yes, I'm a native Arab who studied religion and the language both formally in a curriculum and under a religious teacher in what's the equivalent of Christian Sunday school. What I said is the view of the majority of scholars from the four schools of thought (Maliki, Hanbali, Shafi'i, Hanafi). In Islam, there is the concept of Ijma, where a majority view of scholars sorta defines the supposedly objective interpretation. With what you mentioned, it can't mean separate or go away because those wou…
/r/MensRights15/03/21 02:20 PM
0

Grammatically that interpretation is literally impossible.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:17 PM
0

Not really , in Islam its condemned to beat your wife and your children Literally false. Quran 4:34
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:16 PM
0

or the womens word worth less than a man which is deliberate misinterpretation because it only apply to very serious offences such as rape because they recognised false rape claims This is literally false. Standard fiqh view is that a woman's testimony in court is half a man's. Hell, freeing a male slave is considered twice as good as freeing a female slave. .Hence you need multiple witnesses ( the words of one vs the words of another) Two men count, or one man and two women. Four women are gene…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:13 PM
0

This guy you linked in the end is so ignorant on Islamic law it's not even funny. Also, theologically speaking a husband can beat his wife as long as he doesn't break any bones or cause any blood to show. This is know as 'ghair mubarih', or not severe.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:09 PM
0

the treatment of women as literal slaves to men I mean, have you read the Bible?
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:04 PM
1

Most?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 05:34 AM
1

Citations?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 05:33 AM
1

The same can be said about MRAs. And instead of celebrating our differences Exactly what are those differences to be celebrated? It seems that it depends on the person. I know people who think that women shouldn't be allowed to testify in court because of the differences between men and women.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:54 PM
1

At this point I firmly believe it's a genetic mutation that makes you mentally deficient. So being a woman is a genetic mutation? Do you think it is appropriate to wear this while telling us about a guy who killed himself? Why wouldn't be? Why the obsession with clothes?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/20 01:46 PM
1

I'd say they're like looking at a sculpture with a painting on it. They're tasty
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/20 09:23 PM
1

Like I said, you're free to be wrong. Tats rock. They add quite a bit to the skin. At least black ones. I'm not a fan of coloured tattoos (and sleeves just feel a bit too much).
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/20 03:36 AM
1

You misunderstood. I was talking to you.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 11:38 PM
1

I mean, I think they look great. Tats are becoming more socially acceptable so they hopefully shouldn't hurt her too much. Up to the individual I suppose.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:16 PM
1

For reference this is an actual incel.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:15 PM
1

Freedom of speech, pals. You're free to be wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:14 PM
1

Nah they're awesome
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:14 PM
1

For reference, our boy here is also an MGTOW who thinks that women are mentally deficienct by virtue of being women. This obsession over clothes just doesn't make sense to me. Worthless moral panic.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:13 PM
1

And of course, the definition of common decency being "whatever I think is too much skin". Entirely subjective.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:11 PM
0

Alternatively, people are simply starting to care less about tattoos so they don't matter that much. Despite your wishes, we're not in the 50s anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:10 PM
1

Why so?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:09 PM
1

Have you noticed how whenever there is any thing that young men like to do and build a nice hobby around it is infiltrated by feminists who do not care at all about the activity in question, but they cry foul how the activity is exclusionary or discriminatory Well, no. You seem to freak out a lot over just words.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:08 PM
1

Why so?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:07 PM
1

I actually kinda like tats like that
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/20 10:03 PM
1

As expected from the MGTOWs, no matter what women are always the big bad
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 11:59 PM
1

Would you say the same about men? Or is it just women who can't be more aggressive? Genuinely unsure what the position of this sub is.
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/20 03:41 PM
1

Would you say the same about men? Or is it just women who can't be more aggressive? Genuinely unsure what the position of this sub is.
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/20 03:40 PM
1

Yes, but lower pay does not mean no pay, and it does not mean that all or even most women will be helplessly in debt because of their major. Just means that women have this issue more often than men. STEM is not purely men after all. Your sources contradict you. You're not doing the work for me. This very idea shows a logical fallacy on your part. The burden was never on me, it was always on you.
/r/MGTOW206/06/20 07:11 PM
1

Citations? Sources? Evidence?
/r/MGTOW206/06/20 07:05 PM
2

Never understood why people are so absolutely obsessed with gender studies. It's a tiny amount of total degrees awarded.
/r/MuslimRedPill06/06/20 01:17 AM
1

Do men not get debt or something? Why would those women have debts but not men?
/r/MGTOW206/06/20 01:15 AM
1

There's a difference between the women in your social circle and women as a whole.
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 08:05 PM
1

Is it though? Do you really have such toxic views on women just because of feminism? And if so, are your beliefs so fragile that you go radical because someone hurt your feelings? Like, I'm an ex Muslim. I regularly get death threats. But I don't think that Muslims are meant to be dominated and that Muslims should be punished as you do with women. So is it really the feminists that cause you to have such a toxic (and eerily similar to the Muslims, might I add) views on women?
/r/MGTOW01/06/20 07:42 PM
1

Probably because people like you exist, who think that women should be punished in relationships and that women are made to be dominated. You're just fuel that gives them reason to stay around.
/r/MGTOW01/06/20 07:27 PM
1

I don't hate women I just know that they're greedy succubus creatures by nature Big yikes. That's like saying "I don't hate Jews I just know they're greedy manipulative evil creatures by nature". Kinda just hate, bud.
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 07:25 PM
1

Or maybe you folks need to clean house
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/20 01:07 AM
1

If I posted evidence and sources - would you care? Yes. Have you ever had sex with a man? Like... it's nice, know what I mean? It is. It's nice when it's consensual. It's not when it's rape. Because it's not consensual. Are you really trying to say that rape isn't real and that men about be free to rape women as they please? Have you ever seen adult movies? That's what excites men. If you're not that kind of girl, they're not going to be excited enough to want to bang you on a regular basis, muc…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 11:44 PM
1

Have you ever been pregnant? How is this relevant? women don't tell other women that they are being abused. Says who? So of course 25% of women might claim that they've "physically abused" because that's probably the percentage of crazy feminists. You are begging the question, a logical fallacy. You are starting with a assumption and forcing it in as the conclusion. There is still the same issue. You have no evidence for your claims. None. Nada. Zilch. Sifir.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 11:11 PM
1

Because I read a lot case law when I was law school. So surely you can cite your sources, no? At least that's the professional thing to do. The data is not legit, I promise. On what basis? By that standard 100% of women have been abused at some point in their lives because once when they were teens a boy said something mean to them. For physical abuse, it's around 25%. Because I have read the court cases. All of them? Again, if you really were legit, then surely you can point at at least a Meta …
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 08:36 PM
1

All I'm going to say is this. You have no evidence and no sources. You have nothing backing up your claim other than worthless anecdotes. I have plenty of sources. So you're basically on the same level as flat earthers. Stop it with the rape. No man wants to rape. That's a female fantasy. Wait, now you're saying that rape isn't real? Evidence? Would you prefer be ignored? Maybe have your man fap to porn instead of having sex with you becasue he's not attracted to you? Or maybe he gets bored of y…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 08:33 PM
1

And they were all fucking druggies, alcoholics, psychos, violent guys, or were involved in a love triangle with an another man. And how do you know that? No they're not. That's some sick feminist fantasy. The data says otherwise. Reality disagrees with you. No. Stop it with the feminist statistics. According to feminists everything is abuse. That's how they get those stats. The methodology is public. The data is there. Science is not in your favour. Seems that reality is against you. You have no…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 07:13 PM
1

And that's why women need to get out of the home and into the workplace. I would say that both genders should have equal opportunity to either work or stay at home. Again, housework is unpaid labour, but it's still labour. Childcare is no easy feat. It should be left up to the individual. There is pressure both ways, pushing women to stay at home and pushing men to stay away from home. Both forms of pressure are wrong. I know several people in the shrink industry. Anecdotes are not exactly a val…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 07:07 PM
1

The problem with feminism is it comes from the perspective that everything is a social construct and seldomly factors human nature That is a fair point. Recently it's been focusing more on outcome that opportunity, and that's an issue. Also the world hasn't become more egalitarian, it's become more Marxist but that's a different discussion. Really? I haven't noticed that myself. As far as I see, it's just standard egalitarian stuff like legal equality and voting. I wouldn't call that Marxist. Ye…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 06:47 PM
1

First history has no shortage of real life examples of women outright being a leader. Jean d'Arc, Queen Anne, Nefertiti and Margret Thatcher quickly come to mind. I know. The patriarchal structure of society certainly didn't help them through. And you can see how in recent times as the world becomes more egalitarian women are now more active in politics and the economy. But do you honestly believe that the majority of women want to wield power like that? That's up to the woman to decide, no?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 05:36 PM
1

It's no big deal. No one is going to kill you or seriously injure you. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499891/ 1500 women die each year in the US from domestic violence. 10% of pregnancy hospital visits are cases by domestic abuse. Fifty percent of women seen in emergency departments report a history of abuse, and approximately 40% of those killed by their abuser sought help in the 2 years before death. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034778/?report=reader 11% of those in eme…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 05:30 PM
1

Women have always been able to wield just as much power as an many but albeit in feminine ways And what are feminine ways? Let me guess, indirect and manipulative, without actual being outright with just being a leader openly. It's literally a system where women are forced into subservient roles even when they don't want to. It's a rejection of meritocracy. Doesn't matter how qualified or willing you are, if you're a woman you have to be subservient, and the only way to actually enforce your wil…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 05:20 PM
1

I've been with my man for 20 years. And I've squeezed four kids through my pussy without anesthesia. There's no beating that comes close to that pain. After that you'll be like "the belt? No big deal" So you are alright with domestic abuse. You're alright with your husband beating you for whatever reason. As I said, an unstable individual. It's the opposite I don't get wound up over fantasies and hysterics. Are you saying that domestic abuse is a fantasy? Eh?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 05:15 PM
1

It's a legit study from New Zealand. Here's a thread about it, Ah, that's better. As stated previously, this isn't a shocker. Most stay at home parents are women, and they don't generate any money because their labour is unpayed. This isn't surprising. It depends on the field. But most women who take psychology do it to pass time. And you know that how? Teaching is filled with women because it's an easy degree and an easy job. So is it a fake job or not? Of course. You can read books on your spa…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 05:14 PM
1

I know. Still, you support domestic violence. You're alright with your husband beating you for whatever reason he thinks is reasonable. You're alright with abuse. I stand by what I said. You're not a very stable individual.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 04:29 PM
1

For reference, u/gimpgirl555 supports domestic violence. They're not exactly a stable individual.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 04:24 PM
1

https://femoid.com/its-true-only-men-pay-tax/ ​ Not gonna lie a website called femoid does not sound like a decent source. Maybe you have some statistics from a bureau or something? psychology Are you saying that physiology is a fake job? teaching Now teaching is a fake job? What? literature You are aware that most of the big names in literature are men, right? Are those also fake jobs? language programs Again, teaching is a fake job? The hell is a real job for you? Anything male dominated? What…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 04:23 PM
1

Since men as a group pay all of the taxes and women as a group pay no taxes, Citations? My family has been in academia for a couple of generations, I know how it works from personal experience. Anecdotes are not data. But if you don't believe me you can look at it objectively: what value does feminist research produce? None at all. It's just a made up job so that women can feel important. Pretty sure that gender studies make up a tiny minority of degrees awarded. That's cultural. There are plent…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 03:45 PM
1

Forgive me but I'm really not interested in a conversation about the feminist boogieman called "patriarchy." I suppose that people do freak out and apply that to loads of stuff, but at its core, a patriarchy is a system where authority is given to men. This very much is how religion operates, no? The biggest problem that I have about these arguments is that we look at the assholes, who are the exception, instead of the norm. I mean, sometimes the norm can be assholes as well. Again, with Islam t…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 03:29 PM
1

The irony is that if I started saying that I would have an enormous amount of mainstream support. Really? Huh. I thought femdom was a minority. Most religions are about worshiping God, trying to align yourself with Him and also what has proven to create a stable prosperous society. I I know. And that includes a pretty extreme patriarchal system. At least with most religions. and it has absolutely nothing to do with either egalitariansim or femdom. Agreed, religion is against egalitarianism. It's…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 02:35 PM
1

Yes I agree with that. But it doesn't have to be that way. We can work on it. True, but I don't think we can ever get to a point where there's full equality between which gender is the stay at home one, since it's always women who get pregnant and breastfeed. I just focus on opportunity to allow people to choose what works for them. You only need to breastfeed for the first three months. Technically, yes, but it can go for up to six months. And child care takes a long time, something that it jus…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 02:28 PM
1

This morning I got an email from some wacko news website wanting to discuss my "radical' approach to marriage. To be fair, it is kinda radical in that it's close to a TPE, just as if a woman was saying that men should be submissive in everything. But in this case radical would just mean that it strays from the general norm, so it's different than the expected. Radical isn't always necessarily bad. Just that it's further from the norm. It's only when things aren't safe, sane, or consensual when t…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 02:18 PM
1

It's not just single parents, women as a group are a net cost to society, And do you know why? It's because women are the ones who are more likely to take care of children and the household. That's just how it is. Women are more likely to be the stay at home parent, so they work less than me overall. It's biology I suppose. Women get pregnant, not men. That's why you have a support system of women who can help you out. Is this really a reliable system though? And does everyone have access to it?…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 01:56 PM
1

That's nice. As long as you're not trying to force other people or shame them into following your mold, you do you. Variety exists, people should remember that, and especially that variety goes both ways. I understand that some people shame submissive women, and that that's also a bad thing for them to do.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 01:40 PM
1

But if you apply a gender perspective you will find that men as a group provide for women as a group. Again, that's because single parents are most likely women, and single parents are most likely women. There's more to this than a simple correlation. That should be their own problem. I disagree. People should try to help those less fortunate. That's the point of society, that's why we're social animals. Which is why it's very important that women work full time. But often times this isn't possi…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 01:26 PM
2

As I said, nothing is wrong with being submissive provided you don't try to force other women (or men) into it, or repeat toxic ideas like that all women should be submissive even if they're not. Do you think all women should be submissive? Regardless if they're more comfortable with being egalitarian or dominant? Safe, sane, consensual. That's the BDSM mantra.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 01:15 PM
1

No it doesn't. Welfare is primarily a transfer of resources form men to women, It's more a transfer of resources from rich people to poor people. Is it really a surprise that single moms with kids aren't exactly rolling in cash? It's not exactly an easy life. 44.3 % of female-headed families with children were living in poverty. This accounted for 34.9 % of the poverty population. Ah, so they're not the majority. As I said. Furthermore, approximately 42 % of welfare spells began within two years…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 01:08 PM
1

Doesn't welfare apply to both genders though? I do believe that single fathers also get assistance, as do old men and lazy men. Or at least they should.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 12:53 PM
1

I sense a tinge of sarcasm. I was hoping for a more genuine answer. What do you think should the laws be? As in, actually, what should they be?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 12:37 PM
1

Do you agree with it? If not, is there a reason, or is it just religion?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 12:34 PM
1

I edited my comment and added something, if you want you can read it again. As you said, it's the Biblical principal. In the Bible, a wife is to submit unto her husband **in everything*". That's everything. That's a lot of things. It's total subservience, much like slavery. Everything your husband says, you obey. You don't have self agency. If you want to be in such a dynamic, then sure, go for it. It's popular in BDSM. It's called TPE, and there is no shame in being into BDSM (let's face it, yo…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 12:28 PM
2

From bit about how women should be obedient little slaves to men without self agency. This sort of extreme religion is poison. Forcing everyone into tiny and limiting boxes is never good. Just because you're alright with surrendering your agency to your husband doesn't mean all women should be forced into the same. Some relationships are egalitarian. Some are female led. And there's nothing wrong with all three dynamics provided it's agreed upon consensually by the couple involved.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 12:17 PM
1

So what do you think about be done about women's rights? Do you think they should be rolled back? How far, if so?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 12:12 PM
1

Is there something wrong with actual gender equality?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 12:02 PM
1

So you're just straight up against women having equal rights?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 11:59 AM
2

It's just what happens with online stuff. Without hard mod regulation, it always turns radical. That's just how the internet works. Especially if it's rather small.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 11:54 AM
1

I don't get it, what's wrong with shows having female leads?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 11:52 AM
1

I thought this sub was about criticism of the feminism movement not hatred of women
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 11:45 AM
1

The hell is high value? What's the metric used to determine value? Is it in any way objective?
/r/MuslimRedPill28/05/20 11:30 PM
1

Birth control exists. If people are educated, they'll actually use it. That's why the US has such a high level of unwanted pregnancies when compared to other western countries, people aren't educated. The US is also more religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 12:01 PM
2

Promiscuous men are similar though, but women don't have such an aversion. They are more likely to have other children and thus their resources are divided, and they have a higher chance of STDs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 04:03 PM
1

Maybe, just maybe, they're not exactly thrilled either about not having a stable house and are just trying to get by? Those kinds of poor people don't have time to worry about the morality of sex. They're just trying to live and survive.
/r/MuslimRedPill21/05/20 04:35 PM
1

Yes I do So why are you now arguing in favour of patriarchy, which is inherently unequal?
/r/MuslimRedPill21/05/20 04:32 PM
1

All those insults are pretty close, so it gives off an image of misogyny. Redpillers aren't taken seriously precisely because all they do is whine and throw insults.
/r/MuslimRedPill21/05/20 04:31 PM
1

It feels like there is a very specific type of person you focus on and generalize an entire population on
/r/MuslimRedPill21/05/20 03:01 PM
1

Did you say that you support gender equality, just that you don't like promiscuity?
/r/MuslimRedPill21/05/20 02:43 PM
1

And you wonder why people call redpillers misogynistic, with this sort of stuff
/r/MuslimRedPill21/05/20 02:42 PM
1

True, there is an annoying bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 01:23 AM
2

Reddit also tolerates a fair bit of misogyny. It doesn't ban people outright for no reason. Just that it's the misogynistic subs that tend to break consent rules more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 11:09 PM
1

It doesn't have scholarly articles. Not a single one has a database or a journal. Not even an EBSCO engine entry. Nothing. You're projecting. You're the one who's using popular sources over scholarly sources. You don't have a single scholarly source. Either a blog or a YouTube video. And why do you use Ad Hominem so much? Are you so intellectually bankrupt that you have to rely on it? The fact that you rely so heavily on it in a way proves how fallacious you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 02:05 AM
1

A YouTube video is not a scholarly source. Not valid. Yep. Nothing more than an emotional rant. You have no science. You are empirically flawed and lacking. Try harder, incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 01:55 AM
1

Except you didn't cite a scholarly source. You cited a blog that used a survey from an extramarital dating cite. That's like conducting a survey at a hospital and deciding that 90% of humans are ill. This is know as bad sample groups. This alone makes the source an empirically unviable one. So you got any actual scholarly source? Or is this pathetic level of sourcing all you have? If I may ask, what background or experience do you have in academics? Because it really feels like you're empiricall…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 01:45 AM
0

Citations?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 01:35 AM
1

For reference, this guy is active in several incel subs
/r/ExRedPill12/04/20 06:40 PM
1

Debunk FGM? What's that supposed to mean? MGM is terrible, I know that. But medically it's less dangerous and harmful than FGM. Something can be horrible without having to make other things less horrible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/20 12:30 AM
1

in order for a man to get a second wife, his first wife must give consent to the judge, and there has to be a reason of why he's marrying a new woman in the first place There is nothing in any relevant scripture that supports this. Patriarchy has existed literally since humankind first existed; it's embedded in our animalistic nature, before organized religions even existed. If you're knowledgeable about the evolution - biological evolution to be specific- you'd know what I mean. However, since …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 07:22 PM
1

The whole "wife beating is allowed" thing stemmed from a false translation of a verse in the Quran concerning women. I'm a native Arabic speaker, and I've studied Islam, I can support my arguments. You can messege me if you'd like to know more. I'd love to. I'm also a native Arabic speaker, and I'd like to have a little debate about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 07:17 PM
1

????? Any source your your baseless and sexist remarks??
/r/MGTOW01/01/19 02:26 PM
1

What? Ignoring the fact that you beleive in this idiotic"Chad" concept, a generalisation like no other, this is not how sex works. Babies don't get poked by penises. Learn anatomy. You seem to lack the ability to use logic. Learn logical fallacies at least and avoid them.
/r/MGTOW01/01/19 02:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter