TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VileInsidias Archive

View 20 posts and 438 comments by VileInsidias on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
248

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists21/05/19 09:35 PM
163

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 10:01 AM
105

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 10:36 AM
66

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists20/04/19 07:47 PM
47

GeneralVileInsidias/r/MensRights22/07/20 10:11 AM
40

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists12/05/19 03:53 PM
26

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists18/03/20 07:49 PM
24

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 07:20 PM
22

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists24/04/19 03:28 PM
17

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists27/04/19 08:04 PM
16

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 12:30 PM
15

GeneralVileInsidias/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:28 PM
11

Anti-MRMVileInsidias/r/MensRights26/05/20 10:23 AM
10

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 09:16 PM
8

ProgressVileInsidias/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:28 PM
7

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists20/04/19 10:27 AM
2

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists27/04/19 11:43 AM
1

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists20/04/19 10:14 AM
1

VileInsidias/r/AntiFeminists05/09/19 09:13 PM
0

FeminismVileInsidias/r/MensRights21/07/20 06:16 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Alright. That makes sense. If it’s in return for a car then the 8k + sex makes sense. Thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/21 12:27 AM
-5

The main reason I’m arguing about this is because people keep thinking I’m some sort of idiot, and being extraordinarily impolite about it, because I’ve said what, in my opinion, is a perfectly logical thing. The main part of what I said was ‘it’s not free’. If it’s an exchange, it isn’t free. So either she was wrong about the ‘it’s free’ or the ‘exchange’ bit. Maybe I am wrong. Maybe I’m a fucking retard. I don’t really care because in my opinion, subjectively, I’ve asked a good question.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:29 PM
-2

She wouldn’t do it if she didn’t have something else she wanted in mind.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:03 PM
-5

Given my original statement, that wouldn’t be free would it.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:02 PM
-1

It’s not.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:01 PM
-4

Surely exchange would imply she gets something in return.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:59 PM
-2

And even then, assuming she is gonna give 8k, your suggestion that she’d want 15k in return would still mean she’s not doing it for free
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:59 PM
-4

When she’s saying ‘how about 8k and I’ll give’ she’s saying ‘you give me 8k and I’ll give you free pussy’
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:58 PM
-8

Following your suggestion, that’s still not free then is it because she’d be getting something worth 15k
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:56 PM
-26

That wouldn’t be a trade would it
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:54 PM
-4

I’m sorry but why would she be offering 8k + pussy if she wanted money in return
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:53 PM
-36

She’s offering pussy in exchange for 8k but ok.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:47 PM
-5

Why does she think it’s free if she’d be receiving 8k in return
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 10:45 PM
1

r/lostredditors
/r/PussyPass05/03/21 09:34 PM
1

I don’t find any nudity amusing. I’d rather not see naked people on my television. Anybody falling down the stairs would be funny. Because it’s a stupid thing to do. People who get upset because it’s a woman falling down the stairs and not a man are sexist twats. Same for a man who gets upset that no women fall down the stairs. Or any other stupid situation, stubbing their toe, biting their tongue, whatever. If kids watch a TV show and take away that, because violence happened to a character in …
/r/MensRights01/02/21 01:05 AM
1

But then the fact that it’s a cartoon kind of mitigates that. Children’s cartoons don’t exactly focus on sexism or social issues. They focus on things that will make children laugh, because that’s what will get kids to continue watching them. Nudity is a subject deemed socially amusing, but then you’ve got people who go ‘that’s showing a naked women that’s shaming all women’. No. Just because something shows an instance of something doesn’t mean it’s representative of every part of that somethin…
/r/MensRights01/02/21 12:14 AM
1

I don’t either, but that’s because culturally it’s just one of those rules. That’s just sort of always existed. I don’t think it’s a dig at men. I think women would be more upset by a naked woman being shown on television. I don’t think many men would be overly upset about it. I don’t think many men are even really that upset about men being shown naked on TV. They normally blur their privates anyway. Edit: and they probably wouldn’t be showing them on television naked if people didn’t think the…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 11:58 PM
2

Idk I think people get too upset by things like this nowadays. 30 years ago if people saw someone fall down the stairs in a film, they’d laugh regardless of who it was. Because it’s funny. But today, if they fell down the stairs, and were something deemed oppressed, then that accident would be seen as oppressive against that something. It isn’t. People focus today on more and more trivial things as an excuse to look like a hero for pointing out the misogyny or racism or whatever. Mr Bean is esta…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 11:38 PM
3

I think these characters aren’t really meant to say ‘what if?’ I think they’re more based around comedy than sending a message. There are lots of examples of female characters being intelligent in books, and there are lots of examples of male characters being stupid. But there are lots of examples of the vice verse. In Harry Potter, Hermione is presented as the smartest, and Neville is presented as one of the clumsiest. Is this an attack against men? No. They made the characters these way becaus…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 11:04 PM
15

To be honest I don’t think Mr Bean applies to men’s rights. It doesn’t depict all men. It shows Mr Bean, who in the show is presented as clumsy. I don’t think it’s a dig at men in general. I don’t think it’d be presented if it was a woman, but that’s more because mega-SJW’s would complain.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:36 PM
1

Yes I’m sure the fact that this durian, grown by a black trans bipolar woman, will make it not smell like shit.
/r/PussyPass16/01/21 11:08 AM
1

Almost like if they don’t pay their rent or taxes, they’ll become homeless or incarcerated or something.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 12:06 PM
3

Yes. I wasn’t being rude. It was meant in more of an ‘exactly’ kind of way.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 01:49 AM
4

If we did that we’d be just as bad as them. We’d also be adhering to exactly what they think already.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 01:48 AM
1

Holy shit that advert at the end. They aren’t even being subtle. They’re genuinely proposing male genocide.
/r/PussyPass24/12/20 06:04 PM
1

Cheers
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/20 03:51 PM
2

‘Us people’ bring it up because it’s a very notable case. If ‘Us people’ brought up cases nobody had heard of, ‘you person’ would have no clue what we were talking about. And why did you say ‘you people’?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/20 11:48 AM
2

I feel like a woman in today’s society really has nothing at all to lose from a false accusation, given they know they won’t be convicted if it fails, and whoever they accuse will have a tarnished reputation whether they’re prosecuted or not. Take amber heard, for example.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/20 07:12 AM
28

You aren’t a domestic abuser. They are. Whoever in a fight throws the first hit is the instigator. They threw the first hit. You didn’t. The domestic abuser is the instigator.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 09:10 AM
2

You can’t really win in arguments like that though. If you believe them, the privilege thing keeps growing. If you don’t believe them, it’s ‘proof that you have male privilege’
/r/MensRights22/11/20 11:24 AM
1

Yeah. They’d just say we’re as bad as they say we are, and us posting such a thing would be proof.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 10:50 PM
2

I mean yeah. While I was writing it, the thought did occur that they’d just look at it and think ‘SeE tHiS iS pRoOf tHaT mEN aRE sExIsT PiGs’
/r/MensRights21/11/20 08:52 PM
40

You get banned for posting here. You get banned for voicing your differing opinion.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 07:31 PM
14

I mean I agree, but don’t they say we’re all violent sociopaths and things like that.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 06:19 PM
29

True but if we did to them what they do to us, they might work out that they don’t like it when we do it to them, so why in tarnation would we like it when they do it to us.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 05:51 PM
5

Idk I think when it first started it had good intentions. It just devolved into mindlessness.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 05:50 PM
174

Just post this image on international women’s day but change the derogatory things about men to women.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 11:57 AM
27

Mate that’s the whole idea of modern feminism; denying that feminism for women has been accomplished so that they can continue fighting for more rights for women. At the expense of the patriarchy (men).
/r/MensRights21/11/20 11:49 AM
4

I don’t see what they think rewording ‘kill all men’ is going to accomplish. Do they think we are all idiots or something.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 11:47 AM
1

With no meaning to insult, but they’re horrible people.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 07:49 PM
2

Incels tend to be honest about being incels, they don’t see it as a bad thing. We aren’t incels though.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 07:47 PM
6

No offence but it sounds like you’re using big words to sound photosynthesis. Secondly this subreddit isn’t dedicated to fighting misandry or misogyny, it’s just to highlight the benefits a woman may get for being a woman, or may not get. Please don’t take offence, thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/20 11:14 PM
5

I’ve never been called a nincompoop before in a serious manner. I’d also like to point out that we aren’t spreading hate. What gives you that idea?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/20 11:03 PM
7

Yep
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/20 04:08 PM
3

I think their own statement of ‘I used to deal drugs’ or ‘I used to drug and rob men’ should still at least give some sort of societal reprimand, even if there’s nothing the law can do. But I get what you mean.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/20 12:08 AM
6

Well, somebody else explained and I understand now. Sorry for any confusion. However I still think it’s ridiculous. Following the drug dealer analogy, surely the police would at least follow up on his supposed drug dealing. Shouldn’t the police investigate something illegal about somebody if they themselves admit it? If they turn out to be fine, well good for them. But if they actually are a criminal then they need to be prosecuted.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/20 12:05 AM
5

Except I don’t see why they would admit to that. If you proclaimed to sell drugs to boost your cred, you’d probably have a reputation for it. If you had completely made that up, surely anybody would realise that when they hadn’t seen you selling drugs before.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/20 11:59 PM
2

Yes. You said that she can’t be prosecuted until a victim comes forward. I think that’s stupid. If she admitted it, surely that trumps the need for somebody to come forward to say she did it.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/20 11:54 PM
10

She admitted it.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/20 11:51 PM
51

Exactly.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/20 10:44 PM
320

It’s funny how they brought up the bill cosby thing cause cardi B did the same thing and she’s still supported but she forgot about that.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/20 07:57 PM
2

I think innocent until proven guilty is better than guilty until proven innocent. Societally, guilty until proven innocent has become the thing people go by. I think it’s better to automatically believe somebody is a good person, because if you automatically assume they’re evil, in a court you would showcase a few biases against them.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:38 PM
1

Sorry for the long messages, I’m trying to keep it as short as possible but sometimes I’m unsuccessful.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:36 PM
2

I would agree a number of men’s issues stem from things in law or society regarding women. I wouldn’t exactly say that a woman having to stay home is oppression, because she wasn’t actually confined to the home. Men were expected to be soldiers, and to do the dangerous jobs of society, and I wouldn’t call this oppression either. Men, biologically, have greater muscle mass and as such are biologically stronger. This isn’t sexist, this is just an observation. So men did jobs in which strength was …
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:35 PM
1

The tying down was just an example. I don’t think most rape allegations are false, I just acknowledge that a number of them are. And they stem from things that aren’t rape because, as I said, the women want to gain something out of it. They know they’ll be believed regardless, but they know they will be better believed if they have some sort of story to it. If they just say ‘I got raped by X’, people will want to know details. It’s sort of this things where, a lie is more believable if it has an…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:31 PM
1

They are different, that’s why I said it. False accusers today do it because they can gain something out of it, but most men don’t actually tie down their women and rape them. These women want attention, and I think if they said ‘my boyfriend harassed me’ has less of an effect than ‘My boyfriend raped me’. I didn’t intend to undermine anything, I just think a number of false rape accusations actually stem from things that aren’t even by definition rape.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:26 PM
1

See it’s the liars not being penalised that gets me. If you falsely accuse somebody of rape, and it’s proven that you are a liar, you have wasted police resources, time, energy, etcetera. You’ve also vilified the person who you’ve accused, for no reason other than your twisted agenda. There is no excuse for it. Regarding the accusations being true bit, I think today quite a lot of rape accusations fit between ‘he tied me down and forced me to have sex’ and ‘he gave me a funny look when I walked …
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:16 PM
1

I think it’s damaging. I think if a man wants to cry, he should have the choice to. If he doesn’t cry when he needs to, then it’ll just build up over time and erupt. It has massive psychological effects.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:12 PM
1

All victims should be taken seriously, but I think believing somebody without evidence can be extremely dangerous, because they might turn out to be lying. I think a certain amount of compassion should be given for people who claim rape, obviously just don’t go ‘Prove it.’ But I think believing them off the bat with no evidence to prove it is extremely stupid.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:03 PM
2

To be honest, people who disagree tend not to be as polite about it. Thank you for being polite about it. I would agree in some places that women are deemed unreliable in positions of power, but I think in western countries, women don’t go for political or social power as much as men because it is extraordinarily personally invasive. It also requires things that, statistically, women don’t normally go into, not because the course wouldn’t accept them, but because they pick things such as gender …
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:01 PM
2

Alright. Women in college who claim rape are believed regardless of whether they tell the truth or not. Men in college who claim rape are disbelieved, told to man up, told that he probably enjoyed it, or that he’s lying, whether he is or isn’t. Women are less likely to pick careers that result in spots of authority because those are highly stressful and personally invasive jobs. More women have college educations because more women are accepted than men. Women in sports tend to be athletic and b…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:48 PM
1

In America, for example, female genital mutilation, I.e female circumcision, is a banned practise. It’s also just highly frowned upon anyway. Yet male genital mutilation is seen as fine. They say things such as ‘it’s just a flap of skin’. If it were just a flap of skin nobody would oppose it. But it isn’t. If it had no purpose it just wouldn’t be there. It’s also fused to the penis of a newborn and they have to literally sever it, which can cause psychological issues later in life despite the fa…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:37 PM
1

It is disgusting, but I just find it amusing. The mental gymnastics required to look at our society, in which men can be cut because women might prefer it, and men have to sign the draft to get basic amenities such as voting, but feminist still argue that we live in a patriarchy, the mental gymnastics could win an Olympic gold medal.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:28 PM
1

By any chance are you new to this? He has been proven innocent, yeah. It’s been proven that Heard actually abused him. She admitted it. But feminists are still standing with her, because the alternative is to stand with Depp, a man. They aren’t overly fond of men.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:24 PM
3

The vote is to help Johnny Depp who has just been vilified by feminists for something he didn’t do. If you posted it in a feminist server they’d ban you because it goes against their beliefs and we all know they’re incapable of rational conversation. So they’d just ban you.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:20 PM
3

They’d object to it but sure. You’d be banned though.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:10 PM
9

That’s slightly less than Ted Kaczynski’s sentence. If 8 life sentences translates to 800 years.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:00 AM
1

She’s a ‘two time transgender’. What does that even mean? Did she transgender from a woman into a man, and then into a woman again?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/20 07:50 PM
2

I always find it amusing when people say ‘goddess’ instead of ‘god’. It’s like the people who want to make Santa Claus female for no reason other than he’s been male for the entirety of history. God technically has no gender, but is still referred to as ‘male’ because ‘father’. So to randomly change it to female is just ridiculous. If we took the tooth fairy and randomly made her male they’d throw a shitfit.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/20 10:47 AM
1

If he put her in a situation where she was coerced to say yes then why did she say no? Feminist logic.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/20 10:42 AM
3

It should be neutral until evidence comes forth. If you automatically take sides that is by definition either misandry or misogyny, depending on whose side you take. The people who would automatically believe a man over a woman are basically the same as those who would believe a woman over a man.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 10:08 AM
16

So the fact that she isn’t likely to reoffend means the offence she already committed means nothing. That’s wonderful news that is. I wonder if it applies to a man. That should mean a suicide bomber should be free of all charges, it’s not like he’s ever going to reoffend is it.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 10:03 AM
2

‘This guy, who is working towards owning a home for orphans, is actually a pedophile! But if we convicted him, he’d never get to show his extraordinary talent with the kids!’
/r/PussyPass21/10/20 12:50 PM
8

Remember when marriage was a matter of love?
/r/MensRights19/10/20 02:48 PM
15

That’s the entire premise of the men’s rights movement. That feminists don’t give a fuck about men so they created their own movement. ‘If men don’t want to die, they shouldn’t choose dangerous jobs.’ If women don’t want lower wages, they shouldn’t choose lower paying jobs.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:05 PM
1

Replace the word ‘man’ with ‘Jew’ and that could go on r/menkampf
/r/MensRights10/10/20 10:15 AM
1

Men ask how feminism helps them. Feminists say ‘make your own movement if you want’. Men do precisely that. Somehow that offends feminists into thinking we’re misogynists. Logic 101.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 10:12 AM
6

Yes memes from here
/r/MensRights09/10/20 02:28 PM
69

How much has feminism done to solve men’s issues? Two quotes come back to me. ‘In the past decade there have been more laws against offending women at the workplace than there have in the past century protecting men from dying in the workplace.’ And ‘women are the primary victims of war. They lose their husbands and sons and fathers to combat.’
/r/MensRights09/10/20 06:40 AM
1

Yes cause the easiest way to erase toxic masculinity is to not be masculine. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:24 AM
1

‘Stop defending yourself’ that should be feminism’s slogan.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:47 PM
5

Maybe she thinks it’s fine because it’s what her mother did when she was in the womb.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:45 PM
2

I personally would be complaining about the fine; because if you’re allowed to be within a 1km distance of your homes plus you wear masks, obey social distancing etc then he actually had no lawful reason to fine you.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:40 PM
1

Yes cause I’m sure “Stupid nigger” and “pick/do that now!” Plus beatings were way more preferable than not being degraded or beaten plus staying at home. I said that as an example btw I don’t actually think that in case anybody gets insulted.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:17 AM
3

No because in the 1950s men didn’t start advocating Femicide. Men couldn’t hit a woman and expect her to not retaliate. Women were just expected to effectively cook and clean and listen. No I’m not saying we should go back to that, but there wasn’t anything that stated a woman could rape a man but a man couldn’t rape a woman.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:14 AM
0

The fact that it took her brothers death to realise #believeallwomen is bullshit, is absolutely atrocious.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/20 07:10 AM
1

They’ll say shit like ‘oh if you go to war and die, we’ll give you a statue.’ Y’know cause millions of years of evolution leading up to you standing here is worth as much as a statue of you.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:04 AM
5

I think I’d rather read Mein Kampf to be honest. Yes it was by Hitler but it’s still extremely famous.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:00 AM
3

Tell him if the wage gap was real he wouldn’t have a job because everyone would just hire women because they could pay them less. What does he teach?
/r/MensRights29/09/20 06:57 AM
2

Feminists after watching a documentary instead of a docuwomentary
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 08:49 PM
2

It’s like saying if you advocate for the rights of animals then you must hate humans. I.e it’s as far away from hating the other as one can get
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 08:46 PM
2

That’s funny cause they somehow manage to fit a small bank inside their tiny ass bag but can’t fit a fuckin phone
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 08:39 PM
1

I’ve never understood why marijuana is illegal. Smoking kills more people yearly and it’s perfectly legal.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 08:08 PM
1

H W A T
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 07:39 PM
1

It’s funny cause the female version of the seat does the opposite of what the male one does and actually forces a ‘man-spread’. So saying that it’s to teach men how to sit is absolutely hypocritical.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 07:27 PM
1

I like how FDS has ‘ranks’. “FDS initiate”, “FDS sycophant” whatever they’re called, it’s like a fucking cult.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 07:18 PM
1

That’s like saying humans have a right to exterminate dogs.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 07:11 PM
1

I think that’d be more fair if she was a pretty sight to look upon
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 07:01 PM
2

‘Looking good is expensive but I’ll still spend my husbands hard earned cash on some clothes or shoes.’ ‘We can all have multiple men in our inbox, but if our husbands have a female friend he has to ditch her immediately.’ ‘Men have higher incomes and as such we will let them provide, to the point that our leeching causes them to lose all of their money, at which point we will ditch him for somebody else.’ ‘If they want to buy you a coffee, then they can only ever afford to buy you coffee.’ Didn…
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 06:58 PM
0

Well yeah.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 12:57 PM
1

You can call it fragile masculinity as much as you want dearest shitheads but just remember that if the guy can punch a hole in the wall he can probably knock a few teeth out along the way.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 10:28 AM
2

I get what you mean but they don’t take us that seriously anyway
/r/MensRights28/09/20 09:45 AM
3

K i l l A l l M e n
/r/MensRights20/09/20 07:20 PM
12

Male feminists of such a magnitude actually come off far worse. Hated by men, hated by feminists And probably hated by most women too.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 04:56 PM
26

E x t e r m i n a t e
/r/MensRights20/09/20 04:43 PM
2

I find it amusing when there’s posts like this and comments saying ‘wear the clothes I want to wear’ knowing full well men don’t give a fuck what you wear because it’s such a trivial and vain thing to worry about.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 08:24 AM
1

Cleaning lumps of fat and shit out of the sewers? Fat chance.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 08:17 AM
7

’oh fuck yeah cut it off oh shiiiiiT’ Idk what’s even remotely fetishable about the cutting off of a foreskin. And even then it’s just super specific sadism.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 08:09 AM
6

Sorry wait so there was a distinct possibility that he could have lost the right to vaccinate his child?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 08:04 AM
1

I’ve never understood how abstaining from sex could possibly in their eyes count as rape. Are they unaware that celibacy is literally as far away from rape as one can get?
/r/MensRights18/09/20 06:28 AM
5

Lets reword it. 'Agony of being 50/50 high paying jobs: Men once held the upper hand in getting high paying jobs. Now women are getting equal access... and men are struggling to cope.' I reckon if I made an article like that, people might not like it.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 10:01 PM
1

So #alllivesmatter except the ones I don't think matter. I think most people can spot a few errors in that logic.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/20 09:58 PM
1

I don’t get how you can whine about men using the gender neutral loo. If you don’t want them to use it, just get another loo that’s for women only.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 08:27 PM
2

R$500
/r/MensRights11/09/20 10:05 PM
1

Advocating for one doesn’t mean taking away from the other.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 05:08 PM
1

She means she’s as many days old as she was on the day she made the post. So if I said ‘I am today years old, and I was born in 2000, I’d be 7,558 days old, which translates to 20.70685 years old. Or she could just not be a twat and say ‘I am basically 21’ if she herself was born in 2000. I just used 2000 as a placeholder.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 02:56 PM
2

God fuck the straight white patriarchy and their (reads paper) patriarchal pandemic
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:34 AM
1

‘The judge decided to “err on the side of caution” in giving Michael custody’ apparently the judge didn’t realise Sophie wasn’t accusing her father.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:24 AM
5

My sister said ‘kill all men’ isn’t offensive, then accused me of anti Semitism when I said ‘so kill all men isn’t offensive but if someone said kill all jews you’d call them a Nazi’
/r/MensRights09/09/20 08:07 PM
4

She looks like an optical illusion.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 07:56 PM
20

‘I was today years old’ is where you realise she’s a bit simple.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 07:55 PM
2

However if he loved her he’d be way more likely to take her than a woman would take a homeless man.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 06:02 PM
14

I deny this. Tiktok was shite even before feminism touched it.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/20 09:40 PM
2

‘Disproportionately affected by a system designed for me’ correct me if I’m wrong but they have women’s prisons which would function slightly differently than men’s prisons right?
/r/PussyPass05/09/20 10:44 AM
1

Ah. I would still say that films of rich men trying to get poor women vastly outnumber films about rich women trying to get poor men though. Still.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 11:19 PM
2

Lmao there are loads of movies about the rich prince or king or soldier and in every one of those movies he lowers himself for a poorer woman. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. If you love somebody then economic status shouldn’t mean anything. But there isn’t a single movie or story or anything about a rich woman who marries a poor man that I can name. Because god forbid a woman would have to lower her standards for love.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 05:31 PM
2

To be entirely honest, even if it isn’t literally a war crime if it’s not used in a war, I think it’s still a bad thing to be happening. Chemical and biological weapons were prohibited by the Geneva convention and would classify as war crimes. That doesn’t make them any more ok if you used them outside of a war. If you take out the war, they’re still crimes. The same applies to collective punishment outside of war.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 05:20 PM
1

I’d actually argue making fun of a mental illness is worse because you can’t really fix a mental illness. You can however stop eating like a pig if you want to not be nearly 300 Ibs
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/20 01:15 PM
2

It’s funny because stereotypically masculinity is by definition not fragile.
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/20 01:13 PM
3

People don’t murder because it’s in their genetics. They murder because they enjoy it, or have no choice.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 01:05 PM
1

I’m not proud of myself but not because I’m Male
/r/MensRights01/09/20 08:32 PM
1

By not accepting that men are oppressing women, you are oppressing women.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 09:56 AM
3

Apparently hatred of men ain’t as serious as hatred of women cause men have more power or something.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 08:16 PM
3

Well if you think about it that is disproportionate. They’re dying a lot less. Just the way the media is wording it makes it look like they’re more affected.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 08:14 PM
9

CaUsE iTs MaKiNg a jOkE aT tHe eXpEnSe oF wOmEn aNd mEn sHoUlDn’T bE AlLoWeD tO mAkE jOkEs aBoUt wOmEn
/r/MensRights28/08/20 08:10 PM
25

Literally
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/20 10:10 PM
2

It’s more a social issue. You know that gets brought up too, right?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:32 AM
2

Well think about it. If a man would be attacked for doing it, but a woman does it and is most likely supported, despite the fact it’s a very wrong thing to do, surely that’s a rights issue. No I’m not saying men should have the right to do it. It’s a bad thing to do. But then neither should this woman. But society most likely doesn’t give a shit if she does it.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:30 AM
2

If a man pretended to kidnap himself to get followers on something and free money do you not think people might tell him to fuck off and stop begging
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:25 AM
2

The women weren’t fighting so they should have no say in anyone else fighting.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 05:20 PM
1

If it said ‘stay away from M.E.N and follow W.O.M.E.N’ then it’d probably be a better argument that it’s sexist. Just saying.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 10:10 AM
2

One example would be the women going around giving white feathers to men who didn’t join the war effort to mock and humiliate them.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 10:08 AM
1

This is honestly the first time I’ve seen a woman properly propose to a man. In the Big Bang theory she proposed to Leonard but I don’t know if that counts.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 10:07 AM
8

To be fair, successful by women’s standards is a 6 figure income working as a CEO or some other ridiculous expectation.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 10:05 AM
1

At which point will people just not believe them?
/r/MensRights24/08/20 01:06 AM
1

Problem is you can’t explain privileges to these types of privileged people. If you are a white cis man explaining it, they won’t listen and just think you’re making it up and completely ignore you. If you’re a woman, they just assume you’ve been brainwashed by the patriarchy, they always find some reason to explain it.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 11:58 AM
7

True but to be honest not a lot of them would know that.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:42 PM
45

Cause the feminist subs seem to look at a sub that has nothing to do with women, we don’t say women are at fault we say that modern feminism is, the feminist subs look at this sub about men’s rights and seem to take that as we want to return to 500 years ago.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:06 PM
2

‘That might be true. Maybe if the rest of the countries stopped focusing solely on women they might actually get closer to achieving equality.’
/r/MensRights21/08/20 05:21 PM
3

Quite a few felonies were committed.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 12:40 PM
2

True. They have nothing to gain from it.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 02:27 PM
3

At what point do you reckon they’ll finally admit that society doesn’t actively or even remotely discriminate against them. Because there is no place on earth where women have to legally deal with anything other than a minor irritation. Men can lose half if not everything they’ve worked for from divorce, and his reputation can be decimated by a single rape proclamation. A man has nearly everything to lose from marriage, but if he says that, he’s again ousted and called an incel misogynist rapist…
/r/MensRights19/08/20 01:58 PM
8

It’s funny cause MGTOW is men not wanting to associate with women, which you’d think misandrists would want, but they still see it as misogyny. It’s damaging because they’re not there but all they do is whine when they are. It’s a catch 22 situation.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 09:44 AM
7

I’ve never understood how people can say there’s a system that actively raises men and discriminates against women. If that were true, women couldn’t ruin a mans life with one single word. If it were true Male grades would be marked higher for identical work, not lower.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 09:42 AM
1

That was a joke.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 12:29 PM
1

I find it interesting how they’re so obsessed with never having to hear a negative comment or a differing opinion that they call it misogyny. In places where women are still effectively raped for sport, yes we do need equality. Nobody in this sub would or should deny that women in those countries need equality. The problem is you can’t even word it like that because they take it as ‘women in the first world don’t need equality’. They don’t need it because they already have it. But they seem to t…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 12:48 AM
3

We actually call female dogs ‘bitches’ edit: didn’t see his reply
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/20 06:47 PM
1

What was wrong with her voice she sounds like a lifetime smoker
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/20 06:40 PM
2

There’s almost no such thing as men rejecting women because the man is expected to make the first move in everything. This ultimately leaves every major choice to the woman.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 11:17 AM
1

‘Women are the primary victims of war. Women lose their fathers, their husbands, their sons in combat.’ Replace ‘war’ with ‘the pandemic’ and ‘in combat’ to ‘from infection’. ‘Women are the primary victims of the pandemic. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons from infection.’ These people who make this shit up are actually bellends.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 11:10 AM
12

One comment I read said that the man was the asshole because he wanted to save 40% of his income, and the woman wasn’t one because she DID save 40% of hers. Other comments were saying things like ‘start with 15-25% and raise it gradually’ fuck off that’s just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 11:01 AM
3

Some of the comments on there are absolutely infuriating.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 10:59 AM
4

Atleast they’re honest about their intentions.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 06:36 PM
8

Life
/r/MensRights13/08/20 01:57 AM
2

‘If you are in an abusive relationship get out as soon as possible. You are not the victim.’ Who is the victim then? Surely the person suffering the abuse of an abusive relationship would be the victim of the abuse?
/r/MensRights12/08/20 04:18 PM
2

Surely if you're in an abusive relationship then you are the victim. Or did I read that wrong?
/r/MensRights12/08/20 04:16 PM
3

‘Overlooked no more’ what bullshit she was never overlooked because she’s a fucking psycho
/r/MensRights09/08/20 12:10 PM
9

Ok so if I went into an LGBT pride parade and said ‘Gays are unholy and deserve to die!’ Or something equally offensive, the paraders getting offended by me saying that is the reason why I say it. What bullshit. Atleast they’re honest about their intentions. That’s barely even passable as redeeming but still.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 07:26 PM
9

You know you’re getting to them when you ask questions, period.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 10:49 AM
2

You were supposed to destroy them, not join them
/r/MensRights06/08/20 09:30 AM
3

I’d just say ‘atleast I don’t have to risk my arse getting wet’ then again that only applies in gender neutral bathrooms
/r/MensRights03/08/20 09:54 AM
7

You can see the bit where her face just drops.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 12:12 PM
2

But MGM happens all across the globe. Circumcision is a part of Jewish religion, and other people may do it for other reasons. But FGM isn’t practiced across the planet.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 11:21 PM
1

‘And the boy cried wolf, but nobody believed him’ is probably their argument.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:48 AM
1

Some people are so sexist towards men that they don’t even realise there’s a word for hatred towards men. Or that you can even be sexist towards men.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 09:43 AM
4

I can’t tell if you’re being serious or not.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 05:47 PM
2

Actually the majority of psychopaths go uncaught. Sociopaths are caught far more than psychopaths but then there are differences between sociopaths and psychopaths anyway. Most notably that sociopaths are made and that psychopaths are born the way they are.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 02:03 PM
8

Was one of their arguments that ‘it’s not rape if it’s legal’
/r/MensRights21/07/20 05:54 AM
1

The only one I talk to about it is an avid feminist.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 05:31 AM
6

If anyone says women are the best, tell them ‘when you get conscripted and die for your country based on the word of another person, then come and find me about how women are better’
/r/MensRights20/07/20 10:23 AM
8

I like how 100 years ago, it was ‘Women can be as good at this as men!’ And now it’s become ‘Men can do this as well as women!’
/r/MensRights20/07/20 10:21 AM
9

Why do people preach fat acceptance? It’s not like fat people are poor, starving and overworked is it? They’re not exactly oppressed in any way whatsoever are they? When you take up two seats on the bus, one for each arse cheek, note that these seats are designed for one person each, maybe it’s not your condishuns, maybe it’s you stuffing your fat gob, and maybe it’s not oppreshun, maybe it’s doctors telling you that if you continue eating enough requirement for that of a small population daily,…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 10:10 AM
1

‘When I say kill all men that doesn’t include the men I like’ People seem to think that ‘all’ doesn’t include every instance of whatever it is you describe. When a species goes extinct, the members of that species are all dead. When you are broke, you have spent all of your money. When you say ‘Kill ALL men’, that includes every man on the planet. So as soon as you say ‘this doesn’t include X, Y and Z’ because they’re the ones you like, and then say ‘don’t get it twisted’, it’s not that anybody …
/r/MensRights19/07/20 10:46 PM
3

Two simple phrases answer the question ‘why don’t men show vulnerability?’ ‘Man up’ And ‘Grow a pair’
/r/MensRights19/07/20 10:36 PM
3

If you never let anybody say anything, they’ll never know if what they were going to say is wrong. - me, just now, on the spot.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 09:59 PM
1

Instead of taking STEM courses naturally, something they’re allowed to do, they have to wait until there are women only STEM courses.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 08:16 AM
1

Funny how it’s adopted the name feminism and people just assume that feminism is what they did a hundred years ago. It was suffrage back then. Yes that was needed. Feminism today isn’t. Egalitarianism is.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 10:25 AM
3

They wouldn’t include those in something like this. They definitely wouldn’t include trans because they’re still technically men or women. I’m not sure about NB.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 10:17 AM
1

Whether they’re innocent or not.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:56 AM
8

‘Women accounted for 55% of unemployment whereas men accounted for only 13%’ There seems to be 32% missing from this. The 55% is accounting for the total number of people who are women. That logically leaves the remaining 45% as men. But they say only 13% of it is men. Either I’ve misread it or their statistics are full of shit.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:50 AM
2

It’s funny that atleast one person will have said ‘it’s just a dog what’s the problem’ yet if it was ‘just a dog’ the girl could handle herself fine.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:44 AM
2

You should never have to back down to somebody who hasn’t got to back down to you. If you back down to them, they learn to expect that type of behaviour from everyone they meet. Nobody should have to psychoanalyse everything they say in case somebody else takes it the wrong way. If it was an accident, somebody who is good would take that apology. However yes she did probably post it, going off of my experiences with my own sister. If you say anything against her views on feminism, I.e if you say…
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:32 AM
1

What the holy fuck.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:20 AM
3

This just ties in with the whole ‘guilty until proven innocent’ thing that’s happened today anyway. All of the men who have spent YEARS in prison, and then one day they might be let go because the allegation was proven false, and all they get in return is a pat on the back and ‘Sorry about that, better luck next time.’ It’s absolutely shocking that people would actually condone this. They expect the army to lower its standards to suit women, but don’t expect the law to lower their standards for …
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:18 AM
50

I just find it amusing that people don’t notice it when the shoe is on the other foot.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:13 AM
8

‘Why do people not fawn over men every day, including international men’s day, then?’
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:09 AM
1

If women were as biologically strong as men why would we exclude them from the army? Nobody is going to put their pride as men above having the stronger army.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 06:45 PM
2

A story talks about rape, without even mentioning who was the rapist and people will mostly assume it was a man.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 11:07 PM
23

To be honest even if there is, it’d be ignored for the same reason pride month vastly overshadows Remembrance Day. In the sense that people who died in horrible conditions for their country are overshadowed by people marching down the street holding semi-bi-quasi-transromantic a-pan-omnisexual flags and whatnot. Pride month and women’s month vastly overshadow Remembrance Day and International Men’s day. Plus to be honest, if there was a mans month, feminazis would argue to take it down because ‘…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 11:01 PM
1

It originally started, as is well known, as a group to elevate women’s rights to that of men. What people don’t take into account is that not that many men had those privileges either. Obviously we needed that movement to elevate women’s rights to that of men’s because equality. However the moment people started calling it feminism it became gynocentrism. If it were about equal rights it’d be called humanism, or as it’s called now, egalitarianism. But the moment they had equal rights, somebody d…
/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:52 PM
1

Depression isn’t something that, if you never experienced it when you were young you’ll never experience it ever. Yes you can become clinically depressed if you’ve never been depressed before.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:46 PM
3

Then do it back. I’m not saying don’t defend yourself. I’m saying don’t initiate a conflict.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:56 PM
8

Personally I think nobody should comment on anybody else’s body. If it isn’t your body, you have no right to comment on it. Exceptions would be a doctor telling somebody they need to lose weight because they will keel over and die if they don’t, and things like that.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 01:53 PM
0

What evidence is there that it exists?
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:54 AM
2

Well here’s an example. God is supposed to love everyone regardless of any other factors. Why is there suffering then?
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:02 AM
1

I find it interesting that radfems think god is a woman even though I’m pretty sure there is nothing that actually states gods gender. People just naturally assume god is Male or female.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 10:21 AM
2

It would imply get back to the ki.. Kidding. It wouldn’t imply anything because nobody would say it out of fear of being named a woman hater. Hence why you can say ‘man up’ to a man who doesn’t fit the stereotypical Male description but if you said ‘woman up’ to a woman who didn’t fit the female stereotype everyone would go batshit.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 10:19 AM
1

Lmao nobody believes in god because there’s evidence for it. They do it so they can think they’re good people, and if ever they do something bad they beg for forgiveness. To be honest it has no real effect on your life whether you believe in a god or not.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 10:13 AM
1

She’d know about four of them in real life.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 10:12 AM
1

Why are women under the impression that rape is where a man forcefully sticks his dick up a woman’s ass? Where did they even get this idea from? The idea wouldn’t be publicised because typically you don’t write everywhere ‘This woman has some guys wang stuck up her arse! More details next week!’ Because that’s just rude and insensitive. So where the fuck did these people get the concept that there’s only one type of rape from?
/r/MensRights11/07/20 10:11 AM
11

If a woman comments on a mans height the man should say tall people get a higher chance of back problems when they grow old. Also comment on her weight see how she likes it.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 10:04 AM
3

‘They might say "no psychos" or that they "fucking hate big eyebrows" in their bios.’ Correct me if I’m wrong, but A: does anybody like psychos? And B: some men just don’t like seeing a caterpillar on their face.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 09:53 AM
13

‘I’m sorry you got attacked for being (insert word), but it’s not the same as when it happens to (opposite word).’ In modern culture, if you replace the first insert with anything that isn’t white, or Male, you would be vilified. For example. ‘I’m sorry you got attacked for being black/a woman, but it’s not the same as when it happens to white people/men.’ That would be rightly taken down because it’s racist towards black people or sexist towards women. Yet when it looks like this: ‘I’m sorry yo…
/r/MensRights07/07/20 05:36 PM
7

Ah yes. Stockholm syndrome. Because that makes committing a crime alright.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 07:48 PM
7

No.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:07 PM
1

Legally it doesn’t count as pedophilia because a pedophile has to atleast be of the legal adult age and attracted to someone who isn’t. It’s still against the law though because it’s below the age of consent. Unless the age of consent there is like, 9.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:06 PM
1

It’s funny that this sub has a non-violence policy, but every feminist sub still labels it rape apologist, rape advocate, incel, basically any term that’s offensive to men relative to violence.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 10:03 AM
1

This post: ^ Feminists: ‘that man is a possible rapist and child predator. Look at him with this young child. It probably isn’t even his. Look at how his father is condoning such behaviour. kill all men.’ Because yes.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 08:54 PM
3

They can’t even read some of those.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 08:12 PM
5

Men might hide it better. Doesn’t mean they don’t feel anything. I think a victim of sexual abuse who was Male might find it worse, because he knows he can’t go to anyone or get it sorted because he just gets ridiculed.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 04:45 PM
1

Reverse sexism doesn’t exist. She’s right. Normal people just call it sexism. Sexism against a man and sexism against a woman are exactly the same. They’re both sexism. Calling it ‘reverse sexism’ sort of just mitigates the fact that there is a problem. Of course there is a problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/06/20 10:54 PM
4

So they sexually assaulted him, tortured him, committed actual very serious crimes, and feminists still claim that females can't rape males. I don't understand how stupid you have to be to actually deny something like this. And then the wanker said 'This is more ableism than anything'. Even if that were true, how the fuck does that make it any better? They said it like if you torture somebody, the crime is minimised by them being autistic. Why do radical feminists make false rape claims and shit…
/r/MensRights25/06/20 12:48 PM
3

Just a small story, a girl falsely accused me of rape and went around telling people that I raped her. What actually happened was I picked up a pen within a two foot radius of her.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 11:49 PM
39

There wouldn’t be public outcry because men are just expected to deal with this shit. The changing stereotypes thing is really frustrating. Women can be whatever they want, which is fine. But men are expected to be unemotional and stoic and masculine and shit. Any man who disagrees is an incel or a pussy. But there wouldn’t be public outcry because not enough people would give a fuck. It’s sad.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 11:16 PM
2

Gotta love it when they create laws that forbid something that doesn’t exist.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/20 12:16 AM
3

‘This is sexist because it blatantly leaves women out of the celebration, Father’s Day needs to be banned!’ - feminism.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 10:43 AM
46

The whole point of it is to honour your father if he’s here and to honour him if he’s dead. Getting rid of the holiday is like saying ‘I don’t care about him now that he’s dead’. Note how she says ‘I’, not ‘we’. The whole movement has just become ‘Do it for ME’.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 08:37 AM
1

Well it’s not that I don’t understand or get annoyed at the posts. It’s that I think that sometimes it’s a bit futile because the nature of feminism dictates that they don’t give a fuck what we say.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 08:11 AM
1

Future is female. Magic is might. This women is essentially Voldemort.
/r/PussyPass16/06/20 09:57 PM
1

To be honest there’s no point in sharing your views with anyone not on this sub. The nature of these people dictates that they will just delete the post and/or ban you from the subreddit. I just think that if enough people posted about things they don’t want to hear, that they’d get tired of deleting it all and maybe some of them would read it.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:03 PM
0

No I’m not trying to dissuade them. I’m saying we need to tell these kinds of things to the people who need to hear it most. Posting here is like stockpiling all of the stuff that people need to hear. Which is good. What isn’t good is that the people who need to read it most are the ones least likely to do so of their own volition and most likely to not believe it even if they do read it.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:39 PM
1

Yes I understand that. I’m not saying don’t make men feel like they deserve to be appreciated. Of course they do. But I’m saying that to actually make society atleast notice the problems men face, we should be telling as many people as possible.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 05:07 PM
2

The fact that you have to do a petition on change.org to get a petition on change.org about men’s rights is fucking ridiculous. It’s absolutely disgraceful that you not only have to petition for men’s rights, but you have to get permission to get permission for men’s rights. The people deciding this shit are secretly hoping that we’ll just give up.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 12:41 PM
9

Sorry wait why would a gay man grope a woman? He’s gay, that means he is attracted to other men, so if he’s going after a woman he’s either bisexual or hetero.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 12:33 PM
1

How the fuck is that black lives matter the skin colour wasn’t even specified
/r/PussyPass15/06/20 08:17 PM
1

If she marries her stepson does he become his own stepfather lmao
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:27 PM
1

I don’t understand the point in a posthumous pardon. Like yes it’s nice to say ‘sorry we were wrong’ but he still died before he ever knew that, meaning he spent the remainder of his life known as a rapist
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:21 PM
6

Women can’t be kiddie fiddlers what bullshit
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:16 PM
1

You can’t stand up to them. If you do they will find some way it victimises them and then use that to vilify you. You could say ‘I support equal rights between men and women’ and they’ll take it as ’I don’t support equal rights for people who don’t identify as either gender.’
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:15 PM
5

It’s hilarious because that post was deleted. The subreddit is called ‘relationship advice’ but only caters to providing advice to women. Men can have relationship problems too. As evidenced by this man whose partner and her family beat him.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:09 PM
4

‘That assassin just killed a woman! That’s sexism! Assassins shouldn’t kill women, they should only kill men who deserve it’
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:08 PM
4

It’s double standards. Both aren’t useful in any way whatsoever, circumcision leads to lack of feeling in the penis and probably does the same for the vagina, and if the human body developed it, it’s probably there for a reason. The only thing I can name in the human body that’s function is unknown is the appendix, because nobody knows what that is for.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 06:42 PM
1

Ethereal beautiful creatures that still require a bit of a man to create either a ‘disgusting obscenity’ or another ‘ethereal creature.’ I find it amusing.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 01:58 PM
3

If it were a patriarchy we’d be sending the women to die in wars.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 01:51 PM
2

That flap of skin is there for a reason.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 01:50 PM
2

People might also take it as you trying to hide the truth even if twitter did take it down.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 01:39 PM
7

There’s also the fact of people saying it’s just a useless flap of skin. It’s there for a reason, it evolved over time for a specific purpose. People who remove it religiously, their god, assumed to be the creator of all life and everything, surely put that flap of skin there for a reason.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 01:37 PM
0

Without men you women would never even have the option to create life because you need sperm and an egg to reproduce. Women say they don’t need men but if men had never existed women wouldn’t either unless they’d learned how to go through binary fission.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 09:13 AM
7

Maybe it is actually that they want us to die. This is just a more polite way of saying it.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:38 AM
2

They also tend to actively deny the other side of the story in that males can be abused and oppressed too.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 05:35 PM
3

‘I mean obviously I’m upset but I can’t let him know that’ Sure post it on social media where not only he but everyone can see it.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 02:19 AM
3

According to somebody I know, ‘all lives matter’ is like trying hide ‘Black lives matter’. She then came up with this example; If there was a row of houses, each representing an ethnicity, and the one representing black lives was on fire, then saying ‘all lives matter’ would be to spray water on all the houses. But the problem with that, following her metaphor, what if two houses were on fire? To say ‘this life matters’ is like saying ‘this life matters more’. Following her metaphor, if two hous…
/r/MensRights07/06/20 11:16 PM
2

That actually made me feel disgusted.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 11:07 AM
2

If he’d coughed on her would she have backed off.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 11:06 AM
3

‘No posting any regressive stuff like racism, misogyny, homophobia, etcetera. Misandry is fine tho.’
/r/MensRights07/06/20 11:03 AM
5

I like the bits where she says some of her friends are big enough faggots that she likes them and the bit where she said ‘if the camp is nice maybe I’d send them for about a week’. Faggot is an offensive slur and is to homosexuality as the N word is to black person. I wouldn’t say it’s as offensive given I can say that word but not the N-word but it is still extremely offensive. Secondly, isn’t the idea of sending anyone to a camp for re-humanising’ or whatever she said it was for slightly dehum…
/r/MensRights07/06/20 10:58 AM
3

Just don’t hit anyone. If a man hits a woman, it should be socially acceptable for her to hit him back. If a woman hits a man, it should be socially acceptable for him to hit her back. But of course in a better society nobody would hit anybody.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 10:51 AM
1

Well yes obviously. If she wants to keep it then she can. Just the option of getting an abortion is available.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 07:30 PM
1

I never once said rape is ok. Under no circumstances is that ok. What I said was that the problem of women getting raped who become pregnant can be quelled easily. Would you rather she gave birth, with the constant reminder of that traumatic event? In some cases of rape victims who get pregnant, they end up not caring for the child and abusing or neglecting it. Would you rather they potentially neglect or abuse it? Edit: the rapist should still receive charges obviously. Just some of the potenti…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 07:22 PM
4

True
/r/MensRights06/06/20 01:46 PM
2

Fair enough then.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 11:13 AM
1

For a split second there I was thinking ‘But men can’t get pregnant so what are you on about’. Whatever is required for an abortion, I’ve not really done research on what that is, don’t they give it for free if you go to the hospital right after being raped?
/r/MensRights06/06/20 11:03 AM
6

I think the term ‘Wanker’ would be more appropriate.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:57 AM
6

Isn’t it funny how when someone says not all men, they just mock it. I think we should make a sexist post directed towards women; ‘all women are...’ and wait for someone to respond. If they say ‘not all women are...’ then we do exactly the same I.e ‘nOt AlL wOmEn’. Obviously this isn’t something we would or could ever do, for two reasons. A: the post would be deleted faster than you can say ‘Feminism today isn’t about equality’ and B: we aren’t massive sexists or ignoramuses.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:56 AM
2

Their hatred of emotionally bonding with men is what’s turning some of them into sociopaths.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:48 AM
1

Cause truthful comments that are only hurtful to the ones who don’t believe it are equivalent to very hurtful comments and riots involving beating, man slaughter and murder.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:45 AM
7

All lives are equal. But some lives are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:44 AM
5

Why’re women afraid of being raped? Just stay indoors, don’t put yourself in situations like these. Don’t drink, dress modestly so men don’t mistake you for people who want it. Stay home especially during night so that you don’t stand a chance of appearing vulnerable. Or just nobody rape anybody.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:41 AM
-2

Technically if you think about it they’re both men and women at the same time. They’re men because they’ve either transgendered to a man, or transgendered from a man, but still biologically a man, And they’re women for the same reason as men except change ‘men’ to ‘women’
/r/MensRights05/06/20 10:19 PM
3

That first bit of the video with the woman saying ‘I don’t go on dates with guys who don’t open the door for me’ followed by ‘Really?’ And then he drives off was funny.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 10:15 PM
2

Or just men in general. Whilst these women in these subreddits do exactly that.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 03:39 PM
1

Yeah. They’re also naturally disinclined to listen to anybody who disagrees with them. I know this because I went on twoXChromosomes and somebody started arguing with me, saying that everyone in the MRA is a rapist and whatnot. I naturally disagreed and told them to check this subreddit. They then told me my comments on this server were all vile. I don’t remember any of them being anti-women.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 03:07 PM
2

See I don’t understand why it’s just ‘black lives matter’ surely it should be ‘All lives matter’. Either people don’t think every life is valuable or that some lives are more valuable than others.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 01:38 PM
4

Compared to places like r/feminism where everything they say is toxic.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 01:37 PM
6

I was thinking of putting ‘although many would say Trump isn’t that great’ but I thought people would make the connection anyway.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 12:39 PM
1

Do you reckon if men all transgendered to women, these women would accept that? If they didn’t you could blame them for transphobia.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 12:02 PM
1

Eventually it just turns to sociopathy. When someone bottles up their feelings and emotions eventually they just forget they even have those emotions. I know from experience. Edit: Never letting yourself feel emotions because of trauma or pain is an actual cause of sociopathy.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:57 AM
5

I can name another game where they make as much money and have more rights too. The game of life.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:55 AM
1

Can I just say that twoXchromosomes post is the first one I read that didn’t have a sub-message of ‘commit androcide’.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:54 AM
1

Yes cause him retaliating with ‘need a gf so I can sell her nudes’ is far far worse than ‘Need a bf so I can fuckin sell his kidney on the black market’
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:48 AM
1

Because people would rather hear ‘Black lives matter’ than ‘All lives matter’ because to say ‘All lives matter’ to them is like saying ‘I support the white cop who killed George Floyd’ even though that is not in the slightest what it says.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:36 AM
2

They have a function that automatically bans you from it the moment you post anything on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:30 AM
1

Feminism today follows this, paraphrased from ‘Animal Farm’; “All people are equal, but some people are more equal than others.” Said some people are these women striving for themselves to have more rights than men, or striving for men to have less rights than them. At this point both are the same. Not all women are like this, but some most definitely are. r/feminism changed to social and economic fem-Dom instead of its actual definition.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:23 AM
11

Fair enough
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:14 AM
18

These women who vilify men are.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:13 AM
18

Hence why one is US president and another is British prime minister.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:12 AM
4

A man did say it. Edit: thought you meant ‘imagine a man said it’ and it being what I said
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:42 PM
25

Men who get raped are at fault because they might enjoy it.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 06:17 PM
1

Let me reword that then. More radical feminists than not. I can’t actually make a claim about all women, I’ve not met all women. Sorry for any confusion.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 11:11 AM
2

I agree, most women don’t do this. But quite a lot of feminazi’s do.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 11:06 AM
1

I have a feeling I did point out that not all woman are like this. I said that 80% of feminazi’s, radical feminists are like this. I never at any point said ‘All women do this.’
/r/MensRights30/05/20 11:05 AM
2

Let me try a different scenario. Same scenario minus the one other guy. She goes home, talks about it on Facebook twitter instagram etcetera and in doing so, if she’s a feminazi, she will 8/10 times say that ‘all men are (blank)’. She vilifies all men because of the actions of one. When I said the guy standing there, I didn’t mean it like he stood there and snapped a couple of quick mementos. I mean it like he’s stood there, minding his own business, doesn’t see this man creeping on this girl, c…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 10:36 AM
1

Although at this point, it does feel like more women than not. See, envision this situation. Three people in a room. Two men and one woman. Say one of the men starts harassing or molesting the woman, and the other person doesn’t do anything. The woman will later vilify him whether he did anything or not because he didn’t help.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 09:17 AM
6

I wouldn’t say all women are. Just the ones fighting for rights they already have and not fighting for the rights that we don’t.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 11:48 PM
1

I don’t get how this is at all sexist towards either gender.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 10:53 PM
10

I don’t understand how these women cannot empathise with their partners. Most feminists go on spouting about female rapes all day every day and people lap it up, they empathise with that. But if a man says it, these women just become fucking sociopaths, completely devoid of empathy. I don’t even understand what could they possibly get from this? How the fuck could it possibly benefit them? A false rape allegation gets a man sent to prison. Women see that as a win. Why? They get absolutely nothin…
/r/MensRights29/05/20 10:51 PM
5

It’s fucking hilarious how the person who brought it up was banned and the post deleted. They’re not even just saying women’s problems are more important, they’re outright denying the existence of men’s problems.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 10:36 PM
1

Their logic is probably ‘More men die, so they don’t need the masks.’
/r/MensRights29/05/20 10:34 PM
7

Manstruation
/r/MensRights29/05/20 01:18 PM
2

I would but the problem is that it would be automatically denied.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 12:18 PM
0

Mhm
/r/MensRights28/05/20 02:24 AM
2

When you say that, are you saying it like ‘you’re a woman, you aren’t allowed to be here.’? Because I’m Male. I was making a joke based on how they wanted things renamed if they have ‘man’ in them.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 01:14 AM
3

I’ve never heard chairman referred to as chair. Surely for equality, just call it chairman if it’s a man, and chairwoman if they’re a woman. Landlord if it’s a man. Landlady if it’s a woman. Simple.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:58 PM
6

Given how I found it on r/feminism, it’ll be because the effeminately named ones will be fine, while anything with ‘men’ or ‘man’ in it is vile and vicious.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:42 PM
3

As in it doesn’t.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:40 PM
5

In the same way landlord = owner, and chairman = chair.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:40 PM
1

If he is your Ex, why do you give a shit if he isn’t focussing on you, and if he is your ex why are you expecting him to focus more on you than his children? These people are idiots.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:51 PM
2

A: that animation was horrifying. B: it’s not wrong.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:42 PM
4

They call all men rapists, then falsely accuse men of rape, win, ruin the mans life for something he didn’t do, then ridicule men that are raped or molested by women.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:39 PM
3

Women are receiving less pay than men. More men are dying if Coronavirus. Women are the main victims. Because logic.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:27 PM
1

Didn’t they later say re-do the vote or say it was rigged or some shit.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:22 PM
3

She’s essentially saying that existing in the same space as a woman classifies as sexually inappropriate. I love people like that, it’s so hard to figure out whether they know it’s wrong and enjoy the attention, know it’s wrong but don’t give a shit, or don’t actually know it’s wrong.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:12 PM
15

Funny how these people claim to be so much more intelligent but can’t do basic grammar it’s hilarious.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:06 PM
3

I did know. I just wasn’t aware they were going this far with it
/r/MensRights26/05/20 01:05 PM
4

See people caw about feminism and stuff. A: feminism represents equality for BOTH sexes, not just women. B: they caw about feminism but they’re actually against even listening to men’s rights activism. They go out of their way to not have to listen to it. It’s pathetic.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 10:43 AM
5

They’re essentially the definition of a Devil’s Advocate. Whenever you have a conversation with them, they’re not really listening, just formulating a counter-point.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 10:33 AM
1

Women are victims because a hundred years ago they were cooking meals and not voting, compared to now, when juries are way more likely to believe a woman accusing a man of rape, even if the man can provide evidence that he didn’t do it, and men are essentially expected to be sociopaths, but are shamed and mocked when they show emotion.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 10:19 AM
1

Of course they’ll argue against it. That’s what they do. They only don’t argue against men when they say something like ‘No Men’
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/20 10:43 AM
3

r/theFairerSex
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/20 09:38 PM
2

He shouldn’t be doing that but I mean. Whenever anyone has to explain their jokes, they aren’t funny.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/19 11:08 AM
5

Possibly he’s dyslexic and thought the X was a swastika. Or maybe he is just mentally retarded and never learnt how to read.
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/19 05:36 PM
2

Mhm. For posting about how radical feminism is not good.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/19 10:51 PM
1

They also burned em
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/19 07:57 PM
2

Also I made a hilarious meme where I showed a picture of someone in I think either r/feminism or r/theFairerSex who said ‘feminism is an excuse for us to commit genocide (obviously she said it in a way that didn’t seem so psychopathic) and how it isn’t for equality of the sexes’ so I showed them the google definition of feminism and guess what. It’s about equality of the sexes.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/19 07:55 PM
5

Basically everyone in this subreddit was banned for posting how, contrary to popular belief, the only men that are sociopaths are the ones who are emotionless. Not the ones walking down the street. Such as myself. I, for example, posted how the human race literally could not survive if feminazi’s eradicated males, as a lot of the remaining women would have husbands, and/or male children. If males were eradicated, the women whom had husbands or male children would be grieving, and would seek reve…
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/19 07:52 PM
1

That’s just rude. I’m really not a troll. That would be stupid.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/19 04:46 AM
2

Mk. I don’t see why it has to be about power. Why can’t it just be about equality that’d be so much simpler.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/19 10:59 PM
2

So basically it’s about how women should be superior to men? That’s just called sexism.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/19 10:50 PM
1

Please search the dictionary definition of feminism. It basically means equality. The point though was that what they’re doing isn’t feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/19 10:48 PM
2

If anyone comments and says shit that completely blows what I said out of proportion, or thinks I’m a woman hater, then I’m just going to ignore it because it’s untrue. I don’t hate women.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/19 09:15 PM
1

I proved this subreddit isn’t feminism or I proved that r/theFairerSex isn’t feminism? I didn’t put it on r/theFairerSex because I’m banned from that subreddit. I put it here because I can’t put it in r/theFairerSex
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/19 08:08 AM
1

it’s an ideology. Not a sex
/r/AntiFeminists18/06/19 02:01 PM
2

That’s kinda sexist but ok
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/19 08:56 AM
5

When they forget about Mother’s Day.
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/19 10:19 PM
2

The good thing about r/TheFairerSex is they like to sit on their arses wishing they could commit genocide on men, but would never actually do it because otherwise they lose what they’ve invested their lives in, and just become emotionless voids.
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/19 06:56 AM
4

Your sister sounds a bit thick then.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/19 12:15 PM
4

Maybe if more women actors acted in the film with the male actors there would be more men in the credits. Maybe more men were needed for the film instead of women. If it were a film about women there would probably be more women in it such as a film like ‘pitch perfect’ or some shit. I’m gonna assume there are more women in that I’ve never watched it but you probably get my point.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/19 06:06 AM
1

The fuck is that supposed to mean.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/19 05:50 AM
1

Mkay.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/19 06:12 PM
2

If only people were as intelligent as me. I’m joking obviously I’m not actually egocentric. But I have to admit most of the things I think are actually correct.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/19 02:05 PM
2

I was very surprised at the fact it’s called the fairer sex and it’s all about misandry. Until you consider they mean fairer as in referring to women as fairer than men.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/19 02:04 PM
6

Because they can’t handle criticism, and when someone posts on how not all men are dicks the commenter gets banned and the message deleted.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/19 06:42 AM
3

I’m already insane I just sit there laughing at how they call us misogynists when that whole sub is dedicated to misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/19 09:57 PM
10

That did cross my mind actually but they’ll find holes in literally anything. You could have a woman say it to them and the first thing that would cross their minds would be that men have brainwashed her. They also don’t consider that the smartest people alive have been men, so when they say men are dumb and stupid send them to a Wikipedia page about Albert Einstein.
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/19 09:55 PM
1

Lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/19 05:12 PM
1

Idrk it’s just what they call us.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/19 02:14 PM
1

They aren’t actually fighting to remove it. Because they’re just kinda using what happened ages ago as an excuse to treat men like shit today.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/19 11:14 PM
1

Well yeah. It doesn’t look like that, the post was making fun of r/theFairerSex but I think the point of the image was that they thought it looked like a woman kicking a man in the face.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/19 06:49 AM
2

They’ve kicked you in the face? Oof
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/19 06:22 AM
2

Of course they haven’t. Einstein and newton and Steve jobs and bill gates and Hawking and everything are walking pieces of shit. All they think about is ( blank ) because pieces of shit don’t have minds. They’re mindless. They’re mindless pieces of shit whom have, in order; discovered the theory of relativity and had the highest IQ on the planet, discovered gravity, invented the iPhone that these women probably depend on, created Microsoft and is one of the richest men alive, and hawking discove…
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/19 06:32 PM
6

It legit just looks like the woman is making him smell her foot. Also she’s shirtless. Why.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/19 06:24 PM
5

Nah it won’t be censored. The entire subreddit is dedicated to shit like that.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/19 04:32 PM
37

in the bible, Eve was used by the devil to corrupt Adam into eating the apple. So............ doesn’t that make women the tools of the devil to corrupt men.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/19 08:53 AM
2

Lmao
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/19 09:45 PM
3

I think he may be making fun of them
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/19 09:44 PM
2

Well I’d hoped their handwriting would at least be legible.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/19 11:38 AM
5

I fully support feminism, but I can actually disagree. The suffragettes used violence to achieve their goals. The suffragists, whom are better, didn’t use violence. Radical feminists today promote violence for no reason. People don’t shit on places like Germany for initiating World War Two do they? No I’m not saying they should be shat on btw. But they don’t do it because it was in the past. So why do women today still focus on something that happened a hundred years ago when World War Two wasn’…
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/19 06:20 AM
7

I got muted for pointing out the hilarious bias and they couldn’t handle it.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/19 10:10 PM
4

Her handwriting or his handwriting or it’s handwriting is fucking awful btw you can’t even read it.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/19 09:37 PM
5

Since when did women revert back to the times of the suffragettes?
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/19 05:41 PM
1

Yeah they did
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/19 08:58 PM
1

Look in r/theFairerSex and r/feminism to find out what they think of men. I can’t explain what they believe because it’s something you have to see.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 10:54 PM
1

Cause tbh at first I thought you were one of the people from those subreddits trying to defend some misandrist bullshit. But sure I’ll give some proof that they’ve made posts on how men should die.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 07:36 PM
2

You probably know one or two people on here personally. I doubt you know everybody. But you trust the people on r/theFairerSex because why would they lie? They’re saints. Their word is law. But yeah why would you take my word that I’m not an idiot? I don’t know why would you. Maybe because I’m not an idiot.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 06:18 PM
2

They can’t even be classified as trollers because they take it so seriously.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 02:14 PM
1

Oof. Sorry bout that
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 02:06 PM
2

You’re very welcome. Just note, don’t comment or make any posts. They will ban you before they even realise it’s logical.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 02:02 PM
2

No that wasn’t the point. The point was that if either sex kills the other then they die anyway
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 02:01 PM
2

Yes. Do you actually think I wouldn’t have said they want all men to die if they hadn’t said it.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 11:33 AM
2

It’d be the exact same if men tried to kill all women. Eventually there’d be no women left, then the men who had wives and maybe female children would lose their families. I really don’t see why there are these hate subreddits.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/19 06:20 AM
3

Ikr. So these guys on r/theFairerSex need to get over themselves or they will literally cause the apocalypse.
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/19 09:40 PM
2

Why would they have shame. They banned you because you’re male. They’re misandrists so why on earth would they regret banning you? They censor everything because I can guarantee every deleted message and every banned user either argued that not all men are psychopaths or they themselves were male. There are legitimate psychopaths but being a psychopath isn’t based on gender it’s based on genetics.
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/19 03:31 PM
2

Course they don’t have a legitimate reason.
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/19 02:01 PM
1

No I’m not saying he should be let off. He wasn’t let off either. He was given the electric chair. However my point was that he was definitely one of the most intelligent people to walk the planet. He just happened to be a psychopath and necrophile as well.
/r/AntiFeminists29/04/19 02:26 PM
2

He was absolutely brilliant. He just happened to be a psychopath as well as a genius.
/r/AntiFeminists29/04/19 02:20 PM
1

Well I thought it did
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/19 08:24 AM
1

If you click the picture it sends you to the post
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/19 08:24 AM
8

I was accused of rape. I’m British so I call it year 8 for school, and anyway in year 8, there was this bitch in my form. About halfway through the year she tried to take my shit from me in a class, and I just grabbed it back and she shouted; RAPE!!! Like bitch what the fuck. She then accused me of rape and assault. She also spread rumours about how I raped her and people started coming up to me asking why did I rape her. Modern day feminism is that; if a feminazi can accuse a man of rape, she w…
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/19 11:37 AM
1

I like how every feminazi will be the last of her family because she refuses to have intercourse with a man she loves and loves her back because she believes all men are incapable of love and are manipulative and exploitive. Like all they’re doing is harming themselves because they think a family is less important than false rape and manipulation claims.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/19 11:30 AM
6

R/thefairersex always do that. I’m just surprised they didn’t make up some bullshit about how you broke one of their rules by posting whatever it was you posted. Judging by the fact they banned you I’m guessing you posted some logic and their brains melted.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/19 11:00 AM
4

Of course they’re a lost cause. Everybody on r/feminism are misandrists, and fucking idiots. They believe all men should die. They banned you not for your mild comment, which uses logic and reasoning, but because you genetically are an enemy to them. They’re honestly Nazis. The only difference between these people is that Hitler wanted Jews to die and these people want half the WORLD to die.
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/19 09:44 PM
1

No because he’d be male. She doesn’t hate him because he has money she hates him because she thinks he’s a sexist pig or some shit. Like ‘why spend billions of dollars on a one hundred and thirty year old church when you could pay towards a problem that doesn’t exist!’ ie men being sexist towards women etc.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/19 10:15 PM
1

‘I need therapy because I take Jesus, the son of god and shit on him for getting tortured for six hours because women in the Salem witch trials got tortured for ten minutes.’
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/19 06:02 PM
1

Oh I haven’t watched Monty Python.
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/19 04:54 PM
1

Well the point is that Jesus died and r/thefairersex still find ways to turn it into a way that men are harassing and despising women.
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/19 03:42 PM
1

No. He didn’t. He died. Dying and coming back to life is not the same thing as experiencing pain and then healing from it.
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/19 03:36 PM
1

Np.
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/19 02:03 PM
2

I would recommend messaging them saying; ‘this subreddit is called “the Fairer sex” so wouldn’t that mean both sexes have fair and equal rights, and you’re banning me for being born with an X and Y chromosome instead of two X’s? Would you like me to get another X chromosome and become female? Or would you, instead of controlling what people say by banning everybody who opposed you, accept people for things they have no control over?’ Cause they’d probably mute you if you posted ‘Hi hope your day…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 11:45 PM
5

I agree that the message would be good, be independent etcetera but it’s more the people who wrote it that offend me. The people who lets face it would castrate is and kick us to the dirt if they got the chance. So yes it’s also one sided.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 10:57 PM
1

I actually find it rather funny when they ban me. Because it shows that they can’t handle anyone of the opposite gender in their subs because they believe we’re so evil we’ll take over and spread our evil ways of the truth. Living in denial ain’t good lmao
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 09:13 PM
2

Those subs also tend to block freedom of speech. In the comments of the posts on those subreddits there are barely if any comments. Because they ban whoever comments anything they don’t like. But yea, I don’t see why they hate men so much like do they have nothing better to do.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 09:11 PM
1

F
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 09:05 PM
2

I know that not everybody hates men. However what I find disturbing is there are entire subreddits dedicated to slandering and bullying males for things that happened a hundred years ago and that men can’t control. I don’t have a problem with women as a whole, just as I know not all women despise men. However I don’t like how there are women who dedicate themselves to telling people how evil and vile men are. So if you got offended, I’m dreadfully sorry and this post isn’t aimed at you. It’s aim…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 09:03 PM
5

Mine personally are that if those women, whom call us 'Manlets' and call themselves 'Feminists', have children, it won't be with a husband or anything, whom contrary to their belief can actually love and are not psychopaths, and if they have children, and the child happens to be *male*, will they despise it as much as they despise us or will they raise it as a women and let it inevitably get bullied. Also you can get educated with a man, you can keep your own residence, people don't move in toge…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 07:24 PM
0

R/woooooosh lmao
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 02:04 PM
5

I see homeless men vs homeless women in this ratio; 3 : 0.3. Ive only ever seen maybe three homeless women in my life. I see way more homeless men. Maybe the homeless women converge with each other and just be in the same place as other women in a place nobody’s heard of in a place that doesn’t exist because otherwise according to women we’d see a lot more homeless women.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 06:13 AM
2

Might as well call it ‘an excuse for others to bully my son’. I’m not saying being trans is bad but I don’t think everyone in the world shares that view. That sounds worse than it is but it’s still frowned upon by some people.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/19 06:10 AM
1

I think that sub is absolutely hilarious. They tell lies about men, and are dumb enough to believe their lies. They make up this melodrama and act like we pissed in their drinks and shit like that when we actually didn’t. It’s just sexist and vile. And I’m Vile. Cause that’s my name. Not that I’m actually Vile we in the word disgusting. But the sub is definitely bad. I recommend going in there and unless you’re a misandrist, post about how men are not psychopaths.
/r/MGTOW22/04/19 06:37 PM
1

?
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 05:31 PM
7

Exactly. That’s why I said men don’t say that. I wouldn’t agree with men that do say that but thankfully as has been pointed out, none of them exist. Or mostly none.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 12:30 PM
1

They count is as feminism? Cause that’s just absurd. There’s a name that people have given them, people call them feminazi’s. Going to be honest that’s pretty accurate.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 12:28 PM
4

No it’s extremism. It can’t even be called feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 12:21 PM
5

What they are doing today isn’t feminism. Feminism is the idea that men and women are equal. What they’re promoting is that women are a higher being. They’re promoting that something that we have no control over should be what defines us and that men are lesser. So yes. They shouldn’t blame a sexuality for something that happened a hundred years ago.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 12:14 PM
6

I wasn’t alive back then either but I fail to see how women today, who you’d think would know what it feels like think it’s ok to do it back. It was never ok that men in the past treated women like their property, but it’s not ok that women think they can do it to men.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 11:56 AM
7

I think your idea of authoritarian versus libertarian is a good name to give it. But give it any name and it’s still the exact same thing; it’s women who feel entitled to treat men the same way women were treated a hundred years ago. I can see their motive but seriously. People don’t bring up sixty years ago when black people had no rights as much as women bring up that a man thought a woman didn’t look nice, so that’s discrimination. The man thinks the woman looks nice = you think I look nice? …
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 11:03 AM
24

I also like how there are no comments on these posts despite them having lots of likes, and the reason for that is that anyone who contradicts their ideas IE me saying men don’t say that women are beneath them gets banned and their comments deleted.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/19 10:40 AM
1

They aren’t. Women aren’t superior. Men aren’t superior. Nobody is superior.
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/19 12:16 AM
1

No. Because men and women are the same.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/19 08:40 PM
1

LMAO
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/19 01:09 PM
1

It is hilarious that they’ve convinced themselves that the shit they post is real.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/19 01:03 PM
1

Idek
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/19 10:11 AM
1

Oh wait I explained it like they thought I was male but I’m not. No I am male. I said basically because they basically banned me for being male. Which is sexism.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 10:40 PM
2

What do you mean?
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 10:39 PM
3

I would make a note in the subreddit explaining that anyone who wants to go to r/feminism and explain that not all men are monsters will most likely get banned or muted. The people in those subreddits despise people contradicting their ideas so anyone who disagrees that men are sociopathic freaks will get banned and muted. No I’m not saying men are psychopaths because the people in r/feminism are actual psychopaths. Have you seen the shit they post? Anyway yes I would explain that they don’t see…
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 10:27 PM
8

Well done on stopping that shithead from gaining control of the subreddit.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 09:52 PM
2

Oh and no I’m not egomaniacal I am actually just very intelligent.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 09:18 PM
4

What the actual fuck
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 07:25 PM
6

Maybe they’re investing billions in the rebuilding of the Notre Dame because, unlike sexism today and the wage gap and all that shit, the Notre Dame is a famous, and real thing.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/19 12:31 PM
1

They would just ban you for saying the entire subreddit is dedidactdd to androphobia and misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 11:55 PM
1

I support this subreddit much more than r/feminism because this one is actually RIGHT. I’ve been accused of rape, and it wasn’t fun. For two days until I told someone I had to endure; ‘WHY DID YOU RAPE SO AND SO’ and shit like that.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:52 PM
0

So yeah I agree. I just sometimes spew random bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 10:41 PM
1

Ok I got muted
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 10:40 PM
1

From what I’ve seen of it, atleast half the posts on r/feminism are dedicated to misandry. Feminism isn’t the idea that women are better its the idea that men and women are equal. So why are a lot of posts on r/feminism about hating men?
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 09:03 PM
2

Yes I know the war was unnecessary but that isn’t the point.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 09:00 PM
1

Yeah but r/feminism is kind of now dedicated to proving women as superior to men
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 09:00 PM
3

Well no the idea of feminism is that men and women are equal. But feminism today means misandry and bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 08:59 PM
4

I actually knew that I was going to get banned from r/feminism even before I submitted it, because I checked the rules and the rules literally state that you are not allowed to shit on women, but women are allowed to shit on men. So I knew I was going to get banned. But yes. We do need to do the right thing and stop these idiots thinking the thoughts they think because men get ridiculed and humiliated simply because they’re men, and these women use them as a scapegoat for their problems.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 06:27 PM
6

Dunno
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 02:16 PM
3

I said what the fuck cause of an r/feminism advertisement that came up. They didn’t even give me a reason when I was banned
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 02:01 PM
4

No idea
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 02:00 PM
9

Ew what the fuck
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 10:30 AM
42

It’s fucking incredible how far they go to hate men.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 10:01 AM
1

Maybe women should fight these wars and see how much of a nightmare it is. Have fun complaining about how women get raped in war when you’re suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. The level of bullshittery women go to to shit on men is absurd. Like what’s the point in it. Women have complained about men for years and what has it accomplished besides a bad reputation. I know not all women are mentally stunted but some women are and it’s disgusting when they say shit like this.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 01:17 AM
1

Because the basis of sexism these days is if something fits into something else, it must be sexist. Maybe that’s why feminists are so stupid. Because logic fits into intelligence and feminists have neither.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 01:11 AM
1

I think I might have misinterpreted it now that I look at it again
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/19 08:57 PM
1

I don’t even see why it’s common courtesy for men to not hit women. Like shouldn’t it just be common courtesy to just not fucking hit people for no reason? And if anyone ever comes up to you and hits you for no reason man or woman, you deck them, and kick the SHIT out of them. Then as others have said yea, press charges. If anyone ever provokes un-aggravated assault you deck them and press charges.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/19 08:55 PM
1

Because on a ratio basis you see men cry more than women. Does that make me just a thing because I only ever cry when I too pissed to even shout
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/19 08:53 PM
1

I think the human race would be long dead after the menocide (men-genocide) because if, as women say, more men do work in laboratories and sciencey jobs then wouldn’t they be more familiar with the equipment, therefore can handle it better. And if there are no men to handle the equipment then the women no longer have anything to reproduce with.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/19 08:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter