TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VinterMute Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by VinterMute on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

The woman, however, is a protected class by dint of her gender even then. Sex is the protected class, not being a woman. Protected classes are fields not the individual classifications. Also "right to work" is pertaining to Unions I think you mean "at will employment", which does not apply because either sex is considered a protected class.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 05:40 PM
3

Not really, it isn't considered unbalanced because the gender is not the target feature being classified- programming skill level is. The underlying error would be that the model is overfit to the majority class if there is an excessive amount of false negatives due to that feature being less common.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:41 AM
2

If the fact that we've got Soros on one side and Dershowitz the other doesn't disprove the 'global Jewish conspiracy' I think being on both sides of certain conflicts is literally the root of that that conspiracy.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:19 AM
1

You have serious problems which go beyond growing up in a harsh environment. Start lifting weights, meditating, and read Jordan Peterson's '12 Rules for Life'. Maybe join a church if that is for you. It is not uncommon to feel overwhelmed and not know what to do as you grow up, but surrendering to victimhood is not an answer. There are much worse situations than your lot, and you need to take ownership on what you can improve and what you have to accept. Start preparing to leave when you can and…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:35 PM
-1

They way they are treating you now for being "bi" is how they would treat you for being gay. Or a gay man who is also willing to fuck women, more specifically. They likely see you as a dead end for the family tree even if you would stick a warm hole that happened to be connected to female as well.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 05:52 AM
1

Figure out why many people think discrimination on the basis of merit is justifiable and see if you can ask a more interesting and challenging question. From each according to his effort, to each according to his effect.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:13 PM
3

but Marx understood economics in a way no one else still does That is like claiming Sigmund Freud is still a head of this time.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:10 PM
4

Thieves should take note that a fancy piece of paper is not bulletproof regardless of seal.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:11 AM
8

Women are cheering on sexual assault and rape because it "empowers them"? What the actual fuck? A while ago there was a story posted about two women who lured, raped, and murdered a retarded male teen and one of them had texts describing it as "empowering". I don't necessarily think feminism made her nuts, but it certainly gives an excuse for the crazy to come out. Also, it probably was feminism that made her nuts.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:46 AM
9

Publishing news to sell papers at a profit hasn't really been a thing for a long time now.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:27 PM
65

Stuff like that is usually almost definitely due to a shift of corporate interests behind the scenes.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 04:34 PM
13

Or the court would rather a fraud victim pick up the bill than them. You think there is a social backlash against testing your kid for peace of mind now, imagine having to actually sue for it.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 01:12 AM
–

I mean in the context of drunk sex being illegal, as that is what we are discussing. You did say that psychological studies are what is misinforming/misleading students into believing a myth. I would like to know which one(s) specifically to which you refer.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:59 AM
–

Show me a single case where impeded judgment was the basis of a prosecution, just one. For that matter, show me the psychological study which tricks students into thinking alcohol automatically negates consent as well.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:45 AM
–

...except that drunk sex is not against the law even if judgment is impeded or inhibitions reduced. This is precisely what I am talking about, you have been taught a woozle.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:30 AM
–

No, because they lie during those courses. Where do you think the myth that alcohol automatically negates consent was born?
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:02 AM
–

Not answering or selective answering during questioning can be used against you. You need to specifically exercise your 5th amendment rights and say you refuse to talk to them at all.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:06 PM
10

Should I go in? Should I get a lawyer? No and yes. You apologizing may be seen as an admission of wrongdoing, and anything else you say will only hurt your case. Even if you have a piece of information which shows she is lying about something, watch how quickly the story will change to invalidate it once you tell the police. Get an attorney ASAP; not only is she willing to destroy your life to feel better about hers, but once she gets "support", she will be given validation and peer acceptance o…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:03 PM
–

A socialist utopia consists of no state whatsoever, and workers make all decisions democratically. Democracy is mob rule, if you apply it to the national level enacting and enforcing those decisions is being a defacto state. Is there any limitation to what those workers can decide to do democratically? Where would those limitations come from, and who would uphold them?
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:46 AM
–

Be honest, State Socialism is by far the most common and the only really successful implementation of socialism. The way you guys give everything to the ruling (political) class and claim that makes it collectively owned 'by the people' really cracks me up. Collective ownership is widespread as hell under the capitalist system, just look at every company which gets traded (listed or not), or ask anyone what their retirement accounts are in. The only problem is that you have to actually pay to ow…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:56 AM
0

Why does the first guy have a Z-Rune shirt and the second a Parteiadler tattoo? Is this comic trying to say feminists do not like members of the National Alliance, but the Aryan Brotherhood are alright?
/r/MensRights21/11/15 11:54 PM
2

which spends more time redefining masculinity (through a feminist lens) than it does supporting women or gender equality. Actually it seeks to redefine masculinity in a way which supports females and their imperative by engineering a generation of neutered cucks.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:17 PM
–

Okay, so let's see what was edited- The director, in order to abet the sexual assault narrative, fails to mention all the lies that Erica Kinsman said during the whole process. Here's a small sample. − − • She said she was at a party, where she was hit in the head, knocked out and raped. − ◦ The truth: She and her friends met Jameis and his friends at Potbelly's, a local club. She went back to Jameis's apartment with him. There were witnesses. − •She said accused was 5'11 - 6'1 black man. − ◦ Ja…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:52 AM
–

What you do not seem to understand about the need for a men's day is the empathy gap which persists. Women have always been held in much higher concern and males have been seen as disposable by default in society (men are able to earn status with accomplishment). A somewhat negative side effect is that it has kept some women in a bubble being cared for, and therefore not taken seriously or their skills considered dubiously. This is also what feminists mistake for 'patriarchy', yet what they expl…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 11:23 PM
15

Maybe they just mean an extremist interpretation of the Koran, and not necessary terrorism? Radicalized religion is not much different than patriotism/nationalism in that it is just a different source of propaganda to get young men willing to fight and die over power games.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:46 PM
–

Listen, calling people whichever the prefer is just polite common courtesy, but humoring those people should be considered as a favor to them instead of the PC police jumping down throats as if not catering to others is a egregious offense. It is not fucked up to call a male a man, even if he got a boob job and wants to be addressed differently.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:35 PM
3

Read the books in the sidebar to break out of brainwashing. I also recommend "The Manipulated Man".
/r/MensRights16/11/15 12:41 AM
5

Wow, you're not kidding. It could also be that women care more about how they look when they're found because they don't want to traumatize or hurt other people.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 11:04 PM
7

Yale grads? Get ready for business culture to get even more sanitized.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 07:14 PM
3

The human body in peak condition is aesthetically pleasing. Being wealthy as the rich or intelligent as a genius are also completely unattainable for just about all of society, it doesn't mean we should not look up to role models and ideals.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:46 PM
16

Talk to a lawyer. She sounds dangerous, find out how to get an Emergency order of protection.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:09 AM
10

That was the perfect response.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:13 AM
–

However, if you ask someone whether they had initiated sex with a person who was under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and thus was not really able to provide real consent, they would probably say ‘yes, that has happened’. This scenario happens quite frequently on college campuses, and even though many men and women would not view it as rape or call it rape, legally it is. Another loon spreading that false trope. These mandatory consent classes are creating a generation of party girls who thi…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:53 PM
0

Shrill harpies will label you as 'anti-woman' and as such will try to shame you for not being in your place. Familiarize yourself with the tactics society uses to shame men when women are against him- https://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
/r/MensRights02/11/15 10:07 PM
3

Between 3-4 years.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:39 PM
–

That is not true, the red pill was a trope used by the MRM long before the sub existed. AVFM use to feature it heavily years a head of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:26 PM
–

I think you have the wrong sub, /r/legaladvice is that way --->
/r/MensRights30/10/15 01:30 AM
2

It does not make any aspersions against transexuals at all, they are showing perverts use the wrong bathrooms. That is something which does happen, and the commercial is just saying that now the law would protect them so nobody could stop them from using whichever bathroom they want. Bathrooms are mostly segregated by sex out of comfort for the patrons. Maybe the government should stay out of people's bathrooms and let the owners decide how their facilities will be provided.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:05 AM
5

He should also be prepared with the glossary of shaming tactics feminists use to attack those who disprove them. https://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:06 PM
–

If they bring up police stats, you are an example why those figures are questionable. You can even say for all you know, those are victims of abuse being further victimized. Several studies have confirmed that even when a man reports his abuser, he is the one most likely to get arrested. Also when domestic violence is one sided, women are the abusers 70% of the time. Here are some studies you can brush up on and cite- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175099/ http://www.sascv.org/ijcj…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:02 PM
7

Those 23% of men are probably mostly homeless transients or unemployable for some reason or another.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 09:28 PM
3

http://i.imgur.com/reaKppl.jpg
/r/MensRights21/10/15 06:17 AM
–

As with most in life, quality tends to vary. Game design is something sufficiently complex and requires specialized math (particularly advanced linear equations) that I am not surprised does not translate well into bootcamp form.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 12:23 PM
–

Do you know what the difference is between a code monkey and a software developer? It looks like that place just teaches html5/css and a bit of javascript. Comprehensive knowledge of computer science is overkill for that kind of work, and most software engineering principles are picked up on the job anyway.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:40 AM
7

Yep.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 03:14 PM
2

Furthermore, it is scientifically proven that transgender people have a brain configuration resembling more closely the one of the opposite sex. I think you forgot to specify that it was only 'slightly more likely' for a transgender person; your comment makes it sound like that is the norm. Assuming you are talking about an in vitro virilized brain, and not one simply under the effects of hormone injections, of course.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:09 PM
5

It is okay to have an opinion, it just has to be the same one your teacher has.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:30 PM
–

It is easily to look at the slower and more leisurely pace of the past with fondness, but there is a reason very few people are clamoring to take up sustenance farming today. They did work less, but most would consider their quality of life to be one of wretched poverty and the work they did do to be backbreaking labor with much less compensation than we are use to. Anyway, the horrors of capitalism Marx wrote about turned out to be pure fiction. It is surprising that some luddites still insist …
/r/MensRights05/10/15 12:12 AM
–

Your friend has it backwards. Marx was laughably wrong about fundamental precepts for his "theories" such as industrialization increasing poverty of peasants (living in a developed nation is hella better) and he predicted that borders would disband and the lower classes would unite right when history showed an era of increasing nationalism and war. To explain his failures, followers decided that it was not poverty which was the issue. The problem now had to be relative poverty now instead of abs…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:58 PM
0

So you just like raw chafe or do you precum like crazy from yourself?
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:26 AM
-3

You are lucky yours was 'botched' simply by not being effective rather than crippling you sexually.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:58 AM
2

And contrary to what this sub believes, changing ones mind after sex is not sexual assault. What matters is whether there was consent at the time. It's just difficult from an evidentiary perspective to prove it after the fact. But if a woman said in court "I consented to the sex, but regretted it the next morning". A judge would immediately release the accused. That is NOT rape. Nice strawman. A girl who lets her hormones get the best of her rationalizing the next day that she was 'taken advanta…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 05:30 PM
4

Any woman can easily "misremember" or twist reality enough to make you a villain in her own mind when it suits her, which is why men need to stay away from the unstable and vengeful. The truth between you does not matter much, you always run that risk.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:44 AM
2

He is not just a charlatan, he is an ideologue. There are plenty of fanatics who exist to spread their beliefs, some choose academia over street corners but that does not make them any more open to reason and discussion. Sure, Op can ask about which conditions the professor would accept that would demonstrate falsifiably of the theory, or explain how it is a prescriptive model and not even a theory much less fact, but why? It isn't his job to challenge a bigot in a position of authority and as y…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 04:32 PM
2

That is when I realized she was just a crazy person.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 01:29 AM
–

Fine, edited.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 06:49 PM
2

Not All Indians? Nobody said it is all Indian people, just those who adhere to the traditional culture from a more barbaric time.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:47 PM
–

Give me one good reason why she is entitled to his money? Just because he has more money doesn't mean she deserves some of it for happening to be his GF. It would be different if they were married^<sup>orlifepartners.</sup>
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:41 PM
–

There is a huge problem with Indian Tribal culture being stuck in the stone age, particularly on these matters. It sounds like you just don't like a person who isn't brownish pointing that out.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:38 PM
36

Yep, many studies have shown that when a man reports Domestic Violence the most likely outcome is that he will get arrested and a restraining order kicking him out of his own house. Cops whiteknight like crazy because getting all aggro is part of their job. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175099/ http://www.sascv.org/ijcjs/pdfs/carolettaijcjs2010vol5iss1.pdf http://www.clarku.edu/faculty/dhines/Douglas%20%20Hines%202011%20helpseeking%20experiences%20of%20male%20victims.pdf http://ww…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 04:47 AM
–

You are the one who thinks it is a good idea to sue private gym clubs for discrimination...
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:35 AM
–

A gym is a private club, they do not have to accept anyone they do not want to. Why would you insert yourself where you are not wanted, anyway?
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:09 AM
7

That reminds me of a conversation I once had afk. A presumable feminist was telling me that we need laws against people accused (in family court) of rape from being able to gain custody because that is a tool of an abuser and they might even force their victim to pay child support. I told her that there are cases where that happened to men, even underage and their families had to pay the rapist for the pleasure of the deed which got her pregnant. To her credit she said they would be covered too,…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:10 AM
–

It isn't legal to rape men, she still got a few months probation despite being a repeat offender. He might be a victim, but since he is a man society still gives him the provider status of 'wallet'.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:11 AM
10

Regardless of the department, it is acceptable for women to dress in clothing which has traditionally been considered male (button downs, trousers, sweaters), but not the reverse. Society being more restrictive on what is socially acceptable for men must be due to misogyny, because the alternative would literally break their entire model of critical theory and they would lose some of that sweet victimhood they get so high on.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:23 AM
1

It is so hated and reviled in society (on par with murder and even among criminals rapists are the lowest of the low) that jokes about it elicit shock and are considered edgy. Therefore, it is the jokes themselve which cause rape and prove that our society is rape culture central.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 08:05 AM
1

It does not matter if he tried to work it out with HR, she is his superior and automatically represents the company. When someone not managing you harasses you, you have to complain and show the company refuses to address the issue, but when it is your supervisor you do not have to demonstrate any such thing. The usual policy when a worker is unable to get along with his boss is to start getting reasons to get rid of him, no matter who is at fault. He is not their more valuable employee.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 10:32 PM
–

Who said he was in a country?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 03:00 AM
10

I wonder if a trans can be prosecuted similarly.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 06:29 PM
1

Perhaps it was my misunderstanding. Populations cluster and segregate naturally, it makes no sense to force interaction. I have been to plenty of places where it was made clear that I do not belong, nor was I welcome. I would rather know than incite cold hostility or even accidentally invite aggression by unknowingly be in a place dangerous to myself.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:16 AM
5

Definitely not a topic for here, not like there is a flair or anything.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 05:35 AM
–

It is intellectually dishonest if you are trying to confuse State mandated Segregation which oppressed many, and the voluntary 'segregation' which naturally occurs out of the freedom of association.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:21 AM
–

Segregation was mandated by the State to force businesses to not provide services to those they want to. You want to use State mandates to force businesses to provide services to those they do not want to, which isn't much better.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:47 AM
2

They absolutely detain you during a speeding ticket and can use a dog at that time, but they cannot take longer than is 'reasonable' for the officer to finish the ticket stop.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:42 AM
2

It is in menslib, but the conversation is all agreement about how a draft system is beneficial to a nation (seriously).
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:48 AM
7

Guys do not act that way, female pedophiles do.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 09:01 PM
3

What about killing puppies, destroying the environment, instigating wars, and beating up cancer patients?
/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:43 AM
2

The quality of those shows are quite good, except you are confusing the attraction as quality journalism when it clearly is not. Why not judge them for their entertainment value, which their ratings verify as a success? Obviously this PBS show does not even succeed at that. And why should they, you are paying them no matter what so bureaucrats have a vehicle to push their agenda on your dime without your consent.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 07:58 AM
2

A station so good it would not exist without being funded by mandatory tax dollars.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:28 PM
25

The way they phrased that was devious because it implied that having sex with a drunk person is assault when it really only asked if it was possible to be charged with assault for actions done when drunk. Edit- Also it talks about sex against someone's will, but prosecution being difficult if nobody remembers. Why would anyone think that a crime happened if there wasn't a memory of one, but this just takes it for granted that it must have happened? It is like they are going as far as the can to …
/r/MensRights23/08/15 12:03 AM
3

This guy is a well known anti-male reddit troll, no reason to give page views or even discussion because it is not serious.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 10:47 PM
–

It is obviously a troll, there is no school which would have a "no collarbone" rule outside secular fundamentalists. Do you really think every girl there is forced to wear turtlenecks in the summer?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 03:34 AM
–

Fuck that, brothels should be tasteful and decorative to give a touch of class. If the State ran them, they would be in rooms with oscillating bare fluorescent bulbs, paint peeling off cinder block walls, and small waiting rooms full of too close chairs and too much paperwork. Few services could be as free agent as prostitution. There would be nothing legal keeping the workers from being independent contractors and working in which ever facilities they wish, which is better than forcing them to …
/r/MensRights12/08/15 12:34 AM
1

"Using the facilities" is different than retrieving stored items in this context.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:16 AM
21

Lucky...
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:50 AM
–

Nah even the Federation would break the Prime Directive for something this big. He should go straight to the Q collective for swift resolution.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:59 AM
6

Just wait for the next time you get fucked only without evidence of her bias. Even if what happened isn't quite worth it to address, keep in mind you are also doing this to prevent further incidences in the future.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:57 AM
0

He phrased it in a way which could be interpreted as excessive then drew a false equivalence that either it was okay or you should never hit women, not even in defense.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 07:22 PM
2

The way you phrased it seemed to give the options of either it was okay because you did not injure her or it was not okay because you never hit women no matter what. You gave her the hardest backhand you could, after blocking. Sure it de-escalated, but only you know if that was what you believed to be the minimum amount of force necessary.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 07:21 PM
-1

Holy loaded question!
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:38 PM
4

So she wants 35% each month based on his highest earnings retroactive since 2012. It is so typical she will probably get it.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 07:27 AM
–

Is there a place where the quality ones are listed?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 12:17 AM
5

You need to remove her incentive for lying or wanting to keep the baby by removing yourself. All this psychodrama is to keep you around, your best bet is to leave. I bet she gets overly attached to the next person she can and won't want to have your baby anyway, if she was ever pregnant.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 12:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter