TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ViolentCommunication Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by ViolentCommunication on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

Nah, it's clear as day.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:40 PM
-4

I will follow the advice of this thread and teach my son (9) to violate female's boundary's at his own discretion. You guys are so helpful!
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:32 PM
-36

How do you know she denies him all other contact with her?
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:11 PM
-26

Respecting boundaries, and holding the language that builds this ethic all throughout his life. And he won't turn out to be someone who thinks they can do whatever they want to women. I like to think this is more behavior reinforcement for her though, which is also important. Some women don't know how to say no.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:10 PM
-4

When she says don't touch her, you can touch her, son. No worries. Thanks!
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:08 PM
-7

Yes, respect his demands and ignore her boundaries. I get you. Parent of a 7 and 9 year old here. Learning as I go, of course, but maybe I should buy the best-selling manual you published?
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:55 PM
-18

hold boundaries with a fucking infant!?? Clearly you've never breastfed a baby who would squeeze and pull and twist at your other nipple. The mother is using a language that can be carried through as he ages. As long as the tone is gentle, he gets it.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:44 PM
-38

There is a lot of speculation in your comment (ie would not reject a female, motivation, knowing the baby's thoughts). In fact, I'm curious if you are projecting; possibly angered by a woman trying to (1) not only establish and hold boundaries but also (2) trying to teach a young boy to respect boundaries.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:23 PM
-51

What's the problem?
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:09 PM

If our biological imperative is to procreate, then, for you, what is our spiritual imperative?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/23 11:22 PM
0

That doesn't seem accurate based on the op or the source links, but thanks for sharing your opinion.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:45 PM
2

Of course this depends on how you frame your thinking, but I am curious: are you saying pregnancy, labour and parenthood are not burdens/consequences?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:32 PM
-1

You always have a choice. First, it's to have sex or not. Second, it's to pay or not. Third, it's to try and change the culture system so (A) people aren't having frivolous sex, (B) women aren't solely strapped with the burden of pregnancy, labour and parenthood or (C) the state/community pays for the fall-out of your frivolous sex. As a radical, I vote A.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:10 PM
-1

It isn't about a binary of pro-life/pro-choice. There is a gray area of nuance and circumstance that must be considered. I have a consistent life ethic, and have no problem explaining it if necessary.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:07 PM
-2

It ought to be, yes, but he committed sexually, and there are consequences for our choices.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 01:06 PM
-2

Are you giving all your money to your ex? Or a portion of it to cover the responsibility of sex?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 01:01 PM
-3

Well I guess the logical extension of this would be to outlaw abortion!
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:14 AM
-5

Is this post saying that feminism needs men because feminism (in some non-shitty iteration) is actually a worthwhile political campaign?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:03 AM
-17

The woman has the greater decision choice because it's happening to her body, not his. If this male were gestating the child, then they would be privileged with the authority to ultimately choose.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 01:41 AM
5

Thanks! Clearly we can't argue with science categories!
/r/MensRights14/04/23 04:18 PM
2

In the past, I could see how this could be true. It sounds like your saying the male-to-female vector of violence doesn't exist anymore. Yes?
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:01 AM
4

My experience has been those women who have (1) been burned hard by men and (2) who have not healed from that burn, are the ones far less likely to have productive conversations.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 09:42 PM
-6

Male culture is turning the biosphere into a technosphere which can only end in a necrosphere. https://youtu.be/WnNIBYqPUNk Women do not have control of the type of energy to heat or cool their homes. EVs are not sustainable. There is far more to planetary destruction than climate change.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 01:33 PM
3

women say it usually to be derogative and men usually say it empowering My experience has been mixed. Some women give feedback to control, others to give empathy. Same thing goes for some men.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 07:47 PM
2

So it's the tone of delivery that bothers you?
/r/MensRights04/04/23 05:45 PM
2

Whose ideal man? The boss on the construction site? Or the wife?
/r/MensRights04/04/23 04:52 PM
7

Sounds you simply don't like it when women or feminists compare your behavior or personality to that of the ideal man. But when another man does it, no problem. Do I have this correct?
/r/MensRights04/04/23 04:35 PM
2

This utopia will include legalized pornography, prostitutes, brothels, and total control over procreation, right?!
/r/MensRights31/03/23 07:00 PM
1

It's liberal feminism, so really actually quite useless.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:20 AM
1

Stay away from porn. That's it.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 04:05 PM
2

Good man. Today, to celebrate, I purchased five beers at 1130 AM, and then two more beers at 6 PM. As it is late tonight, the beers are now all drunk and my family is happily, gratefully full of pancakes.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 01:29 AM
-1

What is the point? I don't see one being made by OP.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:33 PM
0

Yea that's wild eh
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:30 AM
1

OK thank you
/r/MensRights04/03/23 11:29 PM
3

Guys, this is just the way the system works sometimes; no bias or impartiality: https://tdn.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/no-jail-time-for-kelso-man-who-pleaded-guilty-to-sex-crimes/article_70f3a96e-888e-11ed-af82-ffd349eda107.html https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/no-prison-time-for-u-s-man-who-pleaded-guilty-to-rape-and-sexual-assault-of-four-teenage-girls-1.5676301
/r/MensRights04/03/23 11:28 PM
1

For the rest of the names, I've never heard of them, but clearly they have no reason to hate men, some men, or all men.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 11:13 PM
1

So I haven't read Ice and Fire, Dworkin's first piece of fiction, and I can def tell you haven't either, but thankfully for us, Paul has: https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/478361 I think he adequately fills in the blanks. But I did read a bit of Intercourse and Men Possessing Women, and I admit her writing is abrasive but exceptional. I can sense a hatred of men in those words, for sure, and given the context of the piece, provided by Paul, it doesn't seem misplaced. The Dworkin quote remin…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 11:13 PM
1

By socialist ethics, you would be okay having all but $1500 per year forcibly taken from you and given to people in other countries. Right? Or do the rules suddenly change when it's your money that is being stolen... I fully support taking from the rich - me - and giving to poor. Yes. This is fairness. Dworkin did not hate men, but was brutally - and honestly - critical of male culture in the 70s and 80s. Both Greer and Bindel do not, to me, espouse chauvinistic or misandrist ideas. Maybe you co…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 09:32 PM
1

The hard left believes in the forcible redistribution of wealth. You say this as if it's a bad thing. ALL women share this belief and by nature are already far left. Your biological essentialism suggests it's almost like compassion and fairness are heritable qualities of one's femine dimension. As a bloc, feminists DO NOT allow women to be held accountable for their own suffering Correct. They correctly blame modern culture's iteration of gender. Also correct: feminists hate being accountable fo…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:28 PM
2

You can't say all of them are any of that. The majority are still left-leaning, historical materialists with a strong class analysis, also who do not pin the suffering of women on all men - just damaged, vulnerable, or mentally unstable men. You can read Meghan Murphy who leans a bit right now, but still actively dates men. Or you can read Robert Jensen who presents a very strong argument against pornography. Or you can read Lierre Keith who positions the death culture of men (a la hyper-competi…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter