ViolentVioletRiot Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! Ok so I was just slightly off. He used the term, legitimate rape and said the female body has ways of shutting that down. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/20/us/politics/todd-akin-provokes-ire-with-legitimate-rape-comment.html	/r/MensRights	30/07/21 10:34 AM
1	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! That's actually an argument politicians have used though	/r/MensRights	29/07/21 10:41 PM
5	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! Solid argument, I hate the slogan "happy wife, happy life"	/r/MensRights	29/07/21 10:40 PM
3	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! That's weird because a lot of millennials I personally know are women were raised by people who taught them their every job and chore was to cater to whatever their husband needed. Therapist, cook, maid, child bearer, and nanny. I was only ever taught to listen to men, and that I would be undesirable if I had my own opinions.	/r/MensRights	29/07/21 10:39 PM
7	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! Yikes, that's like saying being wet is consent for a woman...	/r/MensRights	29/07/21 10:33 PM
1	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! It all boils down to communication.	/r/MensRights	29/07/21 10:32 PM