TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VisIxR Archive

View 1 post and 54 comments by VisIxR on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

VisIxR/r/MensRights03/06/11 04:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

well chemical birth control is on the way, but besides that our choices are condoms, vasectomy, and various experimental vasectomy alternatives
/r/MensRights03/06/11 05:06 AM
1

women can still terminate parental responsibilities after the birth, often anonymously, by giving the baby up to adoption, or even just leaving them at a hospital.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 05:05 AM
1

i would claim neither without more data
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:27 PM
1

alright, that's a good way to put it.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:20 PM
2

no one said "women don't manipulate men."
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:16 PM
1

that's much better worded than point #10
/r/MensRights02/06/11 05:31 AM
3

well then I will agree that it is not masculine, with the further clarification that it is not necessarily feminine either. vices are inherently human, and span the genders more or less equally.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:59 AM
1

this is sort of like using the feminist victim-hood vernacular to strip men in power of their masculinity. the old "behind every powerful man there is a powerful woman" mentality. I don't think its a healthy stance to take, as an MRA. are we doing this because we are bitter that they seem to support the feminist agenda through their policy? I mean I can understand the bitterness towards the system, but they are playing a game that involves pandering to the majority, which has been the feminists …
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:51 AM
2

i am applying it to neither gender, but to humanity in general, hence the wording i used, previous post.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 02:40 AM
2

which you are assigning to women, I suppose? I think its a fallacy to assume that manipulation is a trait inherent of either gender, probably a 'Fallacy of Accident' and using such language does little to legitimize the MRA movement.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 01:34 AM
6

10 doesn't actually seem to resonate with me, are we saying men lose their masculinity if they work to put themselves in a place of power?
/r/MensRights01/06/11 11:40 PM
3

no link karma for 'self' threads. so yeah, you need it to be a link to something else directly for it to give you link karma, but here, have some comment karma.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 11:23 PM
1

the only problem is that seastead communities would be like the wild west, and real pirates (as opposed to software pirates) would be a real issue.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 11:18 PM
1

I often advocate this as an option, obviously you need to research which countries have laws that reach between borders, so its likely that europe isn't the best spot to aim at, but it is an option. another, similar, option, though far fetched is to establish a seastead, possibly. this garauntees you are out of the reach of law, and could possibly locate you not too far from your homeland's turf.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 10:02 PM
2

Its a Trap!
/r/MensRights29/05/11 04:42 PM
4

my step sister put her ex husband in the hospital as many times as he put her there.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 03:33 AM
3

except it doesn't have to be in a vagina to end up on a man's penis, does it?
/r/MensRights21/05/11 12:49 AM
7

In the hearts and minds of various 'card carrying' feminists, on college campuses, in the actions of judges and legislators, and vocally in feminists blogs. You see all those antifeminist headline in /r/mensrights? There are your references.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 01:52 AM
1

I liked the analogy to the KKK in the comments. Someone should point out that the KKK has historically defended and won their free speech rights, no matter how deplorable their use of said right is. The phelps clan is our generation's KKK
/r/MensRights26/04/11 04:47 AM
1

these issues haven't arisen I was merely stipulating the sort of inequity against men that could arise from public breast feeding, in an anti-male society. I don't think we're there yet, but it really only takes one paranoid mother to persue charges, I guess.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:18 PM
2

this is a womens rights issue with no crossover into mens rights issues, until men are assumed to be pervs if they are anywhere near women who are breastfeeding, and charged with sexual assault for it. then it will become a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 11:38 PM
16

play with their kids at a park without worrying that someone will accuse them of being a pedophile be assumed innocent when accused of rape seek refuge from charities when in an abusive relationship live, on average, a few more years get drunk at a (strait) bar for free get scholarships based on gender publicly enjoy romantic movies avoid fiscal responsibility of parenthood, under any circumstances, short of expatriation.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 02:52 AM
6

you can't just divide 8% by 2% and multiply by 100% like they did, it completely disregards sample sizes (and margin of error for that matter) error aside, its more like 4.83 women for every man, or 483%.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 11:33 PM
16

regarding makepeace's study, i can see where the '400%' came from. 98% of men and 92% of women reported none or mild. that means 2% or men and 8% of women reported otherwise, thus 'it follows' that there are 4 women for every 1 man (note a lack of application of sample sizes) reporting violence had more than a mild effect. I guess the poster assumed this meant they were seriously injured? (more likely they are parroting some other idiot) theres all kinds of holes in the logic, dealing with margi…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:58 PM
1

is it possible to sue someone over this false accusation?
/r/MensRights14/04/11 12:26 AM
3

I expected to see comments about how their data is wrong, and the 70 cents on the dollar is the result of life choices and not a direct compensation discrepancy.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 03:47 PM
2

he has the option of expatriating, but in doing so effectively gives up a lot of his rights as a father, and an american.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 03:39 PM
2

so acquire wealth, take trips to places where prostitution is legal, pay a portion of what dating costs, and don't worry about the anti-male pitfalls.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:44 AM
2

last I read it got a little media attention and the school initiated some sort of internal investigation, wish I could get a reference for ya but i'm currently too lazy.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 05:56 PM
35

or which part. I choose to believe that they meant that they disagree with the final statement about the majority of men being good people.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:59 AM
1

we used to have that movie lying around. my favorite part is when the sweat of Sean Connery could awaken the apethetics and make them care about living again. also all the boobs. so many boobs.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 04:32 AM
2

if a chubby red headed nerd kicked rachel in her crotch and she doubled over, that might actually be kind of funny, actually.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 12:00 AM
2

technically women get two trimesters to think about abortion, and then a great deal of time to think about giving the baby up for adoption. of course another man can adopt your child, but you cannot shirk your responsibilities by putting your parenting costs up for adoption the way a mother can. heck, mothers often even get additional compensation for it.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 05:35 AM
3

yeah, that would fit.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 08:36 PM
4

slut, bitch, pig, creep, these are sexist slurs boy, and son may be a word that applies only to men, but I would argue he is using agism to dress you down.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 05:37 PM
3

an opossum mother?
/r/MensRights05/03/11 04:38 AM
1

fair enough. does it bother you that if enough people do it wrong, it becomes right over time?
/r/MensRights25/02/11 12:02 AM
-4

you realize how douchey that is, right?
/r/MensRights24/02/11 11:53 PM
2

oversight on my part, still clearly a feminist.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 10:51 PM
4

sounds like an interesting read. funny that the reviewer was dissapointed that the book showed the men's movement in a favorable light. I guess he was hoping that when a woman pulled back the veil on men, it would support his amazingly feminist world view.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:05 PM
0

"government" was not stipulated. but along those lines, I suppose you could also look into any non-profits that receive public funds and give scholarships and grants. You might also check to see if homes for abused women receive public monies.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 07:15 PM
3

well, it holds true that single females have programs if they can also fall into a special subclass: mother, victim of abuse, college student. I don't personally know that impoverished single fathers, victims of abuse, and college students have the same quantity of social options.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 02:12 AM
1

well, for single moms there are plenty.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 11:31 PM
1

making a distinction between feminists and "true feminists" reminds me of when there's a music/fashion movement where one person thinks of themselves as a punk/goth/emo/hipster/mod/whatever, and sees other people trying to do the same thing as posers because they approach it less "authentically", or whatever. From the outside looking in, all goths look like goths to us, whether they listen to the cure and cut themselves or just wear light make up and shop at hot topic. all feminists will be lump…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 05:25 PM
2

First thought from headline: "in front of their computer with a wad of tissue? probably"
/r/MensRights04/01/11 04:00 PM
6

might get out the "ewwwww" brigade
/r/MensRights04/01/11 03:56 PM
8

I have to agree, After the divorce of my first wife I basically forgot how to socialize effectively, so my attempts were all very awkward and the "creepy" moniker became this huge stamp of shame.
/r/MensRights04/01/11 03:52 PM
3

or maybe the guy is a heartless sociopath, and its a frame job in an elaborate plot for the couple to shed both their oppressive families and win the riches.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 03:17 AM
14

he'd probably be arrested, tased, and/or shot, based on the sorts of things you hear in the news these days.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 02:47 PM
1

is there any doubt of that, really?
/r/MensRights21/10/10 07:15 PM
2

This is not men's rights advocation, it is phallus worship.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 04:36 PM
41

in all of these cases the child should be removed from the mother, and she should be jailed as a sex offender. This would be the right way to handle it. I mean do rapist and pedophile men get to assert custody rights for children born of that rape? I wonder if any of these fathers could sue for custody and then sue the rapists for child support. I mean it should be easy to prove that she is an unfit mother, since she likes to rape teenage boys (as it seems in most of the cases)
/r/MensRights15/10/10 05:17 PM
1

wear a pin that says "you are being videotaped. continued conversation will be considered consent"
/r/MensRights08/10/10 04:26 AM
-1

google shopping search for pocket pen camera. they are around $40.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter