TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Visulas Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by Visulas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

the victim mentality of the dudes on this sub and the passive acceptance of said discrimination So you can't stand people who accept or not accept men's issues? That feels like an unwinnable battle there mate. passive acceptance of said discrimination So your solution is to disenfranchise boys/men who are starting to realize but who aren't yet as committed as you? You're just waving people through a doorway that you're blocking...
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:02 PM
1

Is that your plan? If so good news, it's already in effect. Really? How wonderful. The existence of taxes, no matter how they're implemented or how high, ensure equality and fairness everywhere. So that's great to hear! Here's me thinking economics was more complicated.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:13 AM
1

That’s unfathomably ignorant. Your username really does check out.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 10:22 PM
1

I don’t understand what you mean, so I’m questioning you for clarification. Yes, I understnd the concept of a question. I was asking for clarification. You’re talking about redistributing other people’s money are you not? I suspect they would object. We redistribute money every year through taxes. I’m not sure what is controversial about this.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 10:21 PM
1

Probably what they write on their cheques to the sweat shops
/r/MensRights07/02/22 08:32 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're claiming that I'm claiming. Are you questioning that billionaires would pay for it, that taxes for billionaire would be necessary to fund it, or something else?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:31 AM
1

Nothing. There isn't a problem. Troll. These billionaires are not making that money by gouging people (mostly) Absolutely untrue, they're gouging US citizens less than the sweatshops that a significant proportion of the biggest companies use. But the earnings and wealth gaps are getting wider, and not slowly. because they sell their product to billions of people With labor that isn't fairly compensated, that's the problem. As much you cry about 'nobody likes rich people', that was never the poin…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:27 AM
5

If you've got evidence that a particular billionaire has committed criminal acts to make those billions You've misunderstood. I'm not stating a moral judgement on the people earning the money. The system is the problem. If the system worked perfectly, we wouldn't need taxes to redistribute anything. But due to flaws in the system, it's already been done. So what should we do? This is called Luddism. It didn't pan out in the 1700's and won't pan out now. Well, no. The point wasn't about technolog…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:46 PM
10

“We take money from people we don’t like and give it to people we do”. Absolutely not true. It’s redistributing resources from people who should never have been able to make billions in the first place to people who have 2 jobs and can’t afford rent. It’s also going to become more and more important as we struggle to find jobs to “make up” for the sake of keeping our current system. In a perfect system, everyone is paid their worth and nobody would make billions in the first place. Sadly, our ma…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 04:54 AM
2

My current partner was similar to this. I remember the look she gave her friend when I said "I don't think we've proven men have it easier than women". I'd describe it as 'is he actually serious?'. For her, it was never in question that I meant well, perhaps just being misled. I think, the only trick is going the extra mile to ensure the other person doesn't feel defensive or that you are being less open-minded than they are. Nobody questions their own beliefs in an environment where they feel u…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 01:19 AM
7

I agree with you and I think the revision does explain it better. Following on, my take is that It’s the sensitivity to the needs of those around him, with the competence to act on those needs. I don’t think of all this as solely biological or evolutionary, but if we think about the traditional man, his role was to provide and protect. If you look at the features of men that would predict that behaviour, you’d look for sensitivity and competence. Competence of course being an interpreted quality…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 06:36 PM
4

it hurts Excuse me sir, that’s far too open /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 06:26 PM
9

Thank you! If you could follow me around and support all my unsupported claims, I’d really appreciate it. There’s no pension plan, but I do provide biscuits
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 06:24 PM
36

What's more, why would people assume that woman as a group are more anxious rather than just reporting that they're more anxious? When men's suicide is less-than-correctly summarized entirely by 'they don't open up', why would they assume that men are jumping at the chance to say they're scared of being violently beaten or stabbed? It's not even the apathy. It's the absolute confidence that there's nothing to even be apathetic about, that nobody even needs to think twice about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 03:23 PM
1

There will be a few. I wouldn't rest our argument on the ability to find one idiot's tweet.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:10 PM
2

Aha! That was definitely ‘on the spot’. You may wish to adapt it :P
/r/MensRights22/01/22 10:24 AM
2

one-size fits all basically makes people miserable Anything collectivist. Absolutely anything which ignores edge cases, generalizes or otherwise misses out on individuality. Individuality is context, and without context the truth is obscured. But that's what happens when you try to do the right thing, which it looks like was the intent of the original law For sure, I think we have a tendency to assume far too often that malice has drives human action. Unfortunately, the fact remains that the onl…
/r/MensRights22/01/22 12:58 AM
2

Apologies, I didn't copy the link correctly. Here Also
/r/MensRights21/01/22 07:26 PM
1

Read some of the links in this thread. I don't deny the existence of stupid p****s, but that's not the general motivation.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:12 PM
1

At this point we should make membership to popular social movements revokable. It's always a group of brain-dead f***-heads ruining good intentions. Honestly, it took me a while to cut through all the western perspectives to figure out what the fuck was happening.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:11 PM
3

I truly appreciate your response. It should be a model for all of us.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:07 PM
9

Then educate me on why raping your wife is acceptable? THIS is the problem. You've begun the conversation with a disingenuous question. You've set up what follows to be divisive, even if there's a valid point... Surprisingly truth requires nuance. My comment from elsewhere (the last paragraph particularly): Look at the indian male context then. They already are. Look into how anti-dowry laws are used to abuse men. When men simply want to be included in rape laws, they literally get protested. In…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:57 PM
2

yeah thanks for explaining I am now getting why men might be protesting these laws so strongly Huge respect for that. I apologize for being a little abrasive too. We should all be as considerate. as I said I too want all gender issues to be addressed Absolutely. To be perfectly honest, I think all sides are like a ferrari with no driver. We can drive into walls faster, but we'll get to the finish line quicker on roller skates. However, roller-skates don't protect much against rogue ferraris... W…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:53 PM
3

Can't relate, I'm a Brit. Regardless, doesn't mean much to the indian men which we're talking about.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:46 PM
2

No they can't. Because rape is defined by a man penetrating a woman with his penis. So unless the wife's actions fit that description, it won't be.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:31 PM
2

Took me a good 20 minutes to trudge through western, feminist perspectives on the issue before finding some previous context
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:47 PM
6

Look at the indian male context then. They already are. Look into how anti-dowry laws are used to abuse men. When men simply want to be included in rape laws, they literally get protested. Indian men aren't fighting for the right to be rapists, they're fighting to have their experience legally acknowledged. Women (very rightly) want to have rape by a husband considered. Men want to have rape by anyone considered. Why can the entire world understand protesting when something affects their group b…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:44 PM
6

You agree with them because they're not telling you the actual truth behind it. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with how they're going about it, but you need to take the context of men in India. TwoX don't even take western men's experience into account, why would they do the same for indian men?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:22 PM
1

The whole dynamic makes perfect sense from evolutionary psychology perspective I don't necessarily disagree. But the claim isn't that what you're saying makes sense, but that the mechanics are well understood and also the most important across the board. If I've read your comment correctly, you make a distinction between high value men, and common toxic traits which aren't necessarily 'inherent' to value, just commonly present. Which I'd agree with. But then, if those traits are just common in h…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:55 PM
2

then clearly it’s not about women finding them unattractive Again, it isn’t 100% or 0%. What I’m describing is the effect. Being able to attract a woman is important in traditional, heterosexual manhood. I don’t believe for a second that women not finding men attractive is the whole issue. But it is A contributing cause. How prevalent? I really don’t know. It’ll be more or less relevant to the individual. So I’m in Schrodinger’s agreement with you both. But the rest, I absolutely agree with you.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 01:07 PM
1

The phrase "toxic masculinity" is perhaps one of the most commonly misinterpreted phrases out there Well, in other's defence, it is actually used to mean that (by a subset), it just shouldn't be. It would make more sense to rename it, just so it's easier to talk about. Having a universal language that everyone finds easily accessible should be our starting point. No wonder we're so divided. Also, I feel it is a little reductive. It seems like, one of men's true issues is that their issues aren't…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:41 PM
3

So, toxic masculinity is not really a one-sided gendered thing I would agree, if patriarchy and the sheer number of feminists I have spoken to who believe that all of the worlds issues are a result of men (the group and not just the wealthy, powerful ones), didn't say otherwise. Toxic femininity may exist as a concept, but it's not really ever used. In fact, a lot of people would say that, they are like that because of patriarchal pressure. Clearly, given the confusion and how the phrase initial…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:33 PM
1

Absolutely agree. "not appearing weak in front of women" I think it's not appearing weak in front of themselves. It's not about looking bad, it's about invalidating their own identity. "Man up" doesn't work because it's in public, it works because it's what you are supposed to be. You aren't fulfilling your role! Whilst men don't visit doctors when they should, it seems we have a blind spot when we delve into 'why'. One of the reasons I dislike the phrase is because "society did it" seems to be …
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:07 PM
0

I'm on your side here, but I wouldn't say "mostly enforced by women". We should stick to provable claims if we want to be accessible.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 11:58 AM
3

If we were to give "them" the benefit of the doubt, we could consider it just another series of letters that represent a concept, or another series of sounds that express something (in theory). What I think is far more telling is that they refuse to change it. At a time where everything must be rebranded, language needs to be more inclusive, more respect for strangers must be shown... "they" are not willing to alter a phrase to make it more palatable even to further their own ideology. The quest…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 11:53 AM
1

There are two fatal flaws in your argument. Firstly, you’ve assumed my use of the term “feminism” and you’ve obviously misunderstood my argument. yes, there are bad actors. Yes, feminists aren’t 100% on board with ending men’s oppression In your own argument, you imply that the the movement and the strict definition are separate. The actions on the people in the feminist movement are not always perfect implementations of their core values... Criticising the movement is different to criticising t…
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:23 PM
3

Would you mind elaborating? I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but I'm genuinely baffled at your comment.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 05:50 PM
1

Since fundamental feminism is the equality of women to men The definition is very slightly different. Feminism is the advocacy for women's rights, with the goal of gender parity. The definition explicitly is for women's advocacy, not to address other issues. Which as a definition is okay, there's nothing wrong with a women's group. But, feminism includes assumptions, i.e. that men and women are not currently equally affected by modern gender norms, patriarchy theory and is opinionated about how …
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:57 PM
2

You're very welcome! I wish all my interactions on reddit were as positive
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:36 PM
2

It is likely a result of empathy but it is not the condition of empathy Yep, I can get behind that :)
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:34 PM
9

Have you ever been violent towards your partner? Literally the first question... "Help, I've been assaulted by my partner" "Well, have you ever hit someone?" It's honestly difficult to believe... And if that weren't enough: In addition to responses to the questions above, judicial officers might also wish to consider the following questions and issues: Has the man had any history of criminal behaviour or allegations of such behaviour particularly involving violence? Has the man had any intervent…
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:29 PM
3

Helping random people you barely know is not the definition of empathy Whether you know them or not is beside the point entirely. Empathy is the capacity to put yourself in anothers shoes, understand how they're feeling, not just recognize it. If you've lost a family member, and you meet someone else who has just lost someone, and you can understand what they're going through because you can recall that same pain, then that's empathy. Saying someone doesn't have empathy is akin to saying someone…
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:22 PM
3

Empathy is a prerequisite of brotherhood.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:47 PM
2

As bullshit as feminists are, one argument that is hard to rebuttal is the notion of "Men did that to themselves" It's simple. You ask them to prove that. Feminists have a very biased reading of history which is supposedly 'obvious', but none that I have ever spoken to actually know why they believe that. Seeing what we've learned in recent years about domestic violence against men and rape statistics it seems more obvious that we're missing a lot of the picture. The idea that only men are respo…
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:45 PM
0

To be clear, is your claim that I'm incorrectly summarizing that it is men vs women or that I'm correctly summarizing that it is not?
/r/MensRights17/01/22 01:18 PM
0

They are however actively supporting those who do, and that's the issue. I do agree with that. I still believe that we shouldn't call it a supremacy movement. I'd rather describe it as a blind movement or a disingenuous movement or something. In the interests of making men's rights as welcoming as possible, it might just inspire less resistance. But ultimately I agree. If you use that logic then you have no argument against slavery or theft, as they too are industries. Not all industries are the…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 06:51 PM
29

Someone at my university reported me for obviously being "misogynistic" I had something similar occur but not as high-up as university intervention. That's insane. feminist university I'll admit it's a cheap shot, but you probably don't need to specify 'feminist' here. I can't talk about Men's Rights without being called misogynistic I feel this. University in particular is very hostile to men's issues. I didn't have a good time socially. even my experiences being sexually harassed? Wait, they a…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:21 PM
1

I wouldn't call it a supremacy movement. I don't think the vast, vast majority truly believe that they're fighting for supremacy. They're intentionally supplied false and misleading data (by career feminists) to imply that men don't have issues. We're all supplied with biased and skewed data by stakeholders. Feminism is just another industry and it does what they all do. Unfortunately the people on the ground don't realize what they're propping up, but that's true of everyone.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:21 PM
4

It depends on your definition, but feminism is the advocacy for women, with the goal of equality. So whilst they want to raise the bar to at least where men is, they don't care in the slightest if men's bar is below (as a movement). So it's not perfectly synonymous with equality, but you bump the numbers up saying "do you believe in equality? well then you're a feminist".
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:05 PM
2

Do you know where the 62% comes from? I'd like to source the figure if you have it. I remember reading 40% not too long ago, and I'll tell you how I remember. There was a feminist chart showing gender splits of various crimes, and the chart clearly showed that men "were involved" in 60% of parent-child abuse. They got that figure by adding 'both parents' (20%) and 'men' (40%). Very interesting framing don't you think? Doesn't take a genius to see that women are the remaining 40%. Honestly one of…
/r/MensRights15/01/22 11:03 PM
0

Plenty don't, particularly older feminists. Women in my family don't really understand the modern political use of the term, they just think we should love each other more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 12:51 AM
5

I haven't had many relationship challenges specifically, but I have definitely been alienated and gossiped about by ex-friends as a result. Ironically, ones who'd consider themselves 'open-minded'. When we first met, my gf was vehemently opposed to my beliefs. I remember, very clearly, the look she gave her friend when I told her about this stuff. Thankfully, we spoke about it for long enough for her to see that I wasn't just an 'incel'. The favorite summary of me by ex-friends. We don't agree o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 10:05 PM
13

Wait, I thought this was white knighting?...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 08:54 PM
12

From the article: "Man-hating dyke is the worst thing you can call a lesbian" Well, that should be pretty bad right? To hate a significant portion of the world, is a pretty serious issue... It should be treated like the term 'misogynist' would be, if it hadn't been devalued by it's poor usage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 12:49 AM
3

Yeah but, if they always call them that, then we won't know which one the new one is!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 12:45 AM
10

Being fair, feminism isn't organized enough to even be a single movement. Like, identifying as a feminist is functionally meaningless, because it's not specific enough to describe what anyone actually believes in anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 12:43 AM
8

Unfortunately for humans, we still haven't invented anti-hate yet. We're still just moving targets... One day I hope...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 12:40 AM
1

I never want to be too cavalier on this sub, but it just sounds like as shitty excuse for complete apathy about real issues for men. We don't care that men on average have shorter lives because of workplace fatalities, suicide, homelessness, drug addiction, social isolation etc... No, that would be to misogynist...
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:46 AM
10

Only a vocal minority are opposed to it. And why a lot of them are opposed I think is more complicated than simple hate. It’s easy to see why the concept of improving things for others can be a sore point when things like this happen. Any good relationship is reciprocal, and unfortunately supporting women’s issues is (currently) an all-take no-give relationship for men. Unfortunately, there is a real belief that addressing the opposite gender’s issue devalues each gender’s efforts in their own d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 08:35 PM
3

The article did not say it can't happen the other way around. No it just said that there shouldn't be a repercussions... ​ This person requested zero changes in laws about misandry and you think that's dangerous? Wow is that some mental gymnastics... They are advocating for a world where one is legal and the other is not. This isn't inaction, this is taking action on a rolling ball. This is attempting to change the current thought process from targeting two groups to one, that is ACTIVE. A resul…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:30 PM
2

ahaha WHAT? Firstly, the definition of condone is: to regard or treat (something bad) as acceptable, forgivable or blameless What difference do you see between "this should not be punished in ANY WAY" and "this is okay"?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:23 PM
3

Why fight for it then? What other issues do you know of where "we must not legislate this because it isn't quite as bad as the other issues we're fixing"? There's no reason to incite action against this unless you are attached to misandry... once we've got to that point, the question then becomes why? What role does misandry play in making a better world?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:13 PM
3

Absolutely, people always love it when we sacrifice bystanders to force the right state of affairs...
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:10 PM
3

Yes but our tea is exquisit... ah who am I kidding, I'm finishing my course and then moving...
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:08 PM
11

Thank you!
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:07 PM
4

This is where it all falls down for me. Collectivism. Let's forget for a moment that she says that she should be allowed her misandry punishment free in the same article that she spouts the idea that "equality can often feel like oppression to the privileged"... (Note: privileged can be per issue not only generally) She believes, that because essentially "men" as a generalized, collective group, perform better in whatever metrics they can find or quite often misinterpret (which is it's own issue…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:06 PM
3

Yeah for sure. Like many of these studies, I expect the measurements to show something valid, so if I understand the context I can actually apply it correctly instead of... well... *gestures to the internet* Edit: I'll report back if I find it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/21 07:49 PM
9

That's really interesting. Do you have a link at all? I'm curious to know in what conditions the researchers observed private behavior. Continuing on from your point, I expect there's a mix of masculine identity needing to under-express even to ourselves as well as society and the conclusions found in the study.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/21 07:29 PM
1

I think the important thing to remember about anyone, is that you don’t have to defend every aspect of them to take away something novel and useful. There are aspects of him that I don’t particularly like, don’t agree with, but like everyone in life theres something to learn. What I find very refreshing with Jordan Peterson and some right wing commentators (whilst being a leftie) is that whilst I usually disagree with their initial premises, from there on, it can be quite water tight. And that d…
/r/MensRights08/09/21 12:28 PM
1

I think the important thing to remember about anyone, is that you don’t have to defend every aspect of them to take away something novel and useful. There are aspects of him that I don’t particularly like, don’t agree with, but like everyone in life theres something to learn. What I find very refreshing with Jordan Peterson and some right wing commentators (whilst being a leftie) is that whilst I usually disagree with their initial premises, from there on, it can be quite water tight. And that d…
/r/MensRights08/09/21 12:22 PM
11

A case study: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/f2xqxk/raita_with_genders_reverseda_case_study/ The second post has been removed but it'll probably be preserved on reveddit or some similar tool.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 12:09 AM
10

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/f2xqxk/raita_with_genders_reverseda_case_study/ It's been done. The mods wised up and deleted the second post so you might have to check some reddit post preservation tools to get the post back but it's been done, and unsurprisingly the response was very much different.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 12:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter