TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VlDRlS Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by VlDRlS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

why do you dodge though. Or are you claiming that puberty blockers are chemical castration?
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/23 07:02 PM
0

Historical feminism came before Marxism
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/22 08:00 AM
3

Thanks :)
/r/AntiFeminists05/04/22 05:46 AM
-2

Both of us , and everyone on this sub know that you are acting in bad faith rn, so why do it? All i asked for was the articles source
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 11:51 PM
-9

Sources?
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 11:22 PM
2

It's a doctored image. That second article is of a different writer and a different context. Always check your sources and confirmation bias
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 10:26 AM
9

post context?
/r/AntiFeminists17/08/21 09:49 AM
1

There is alot to know about in how many different ways people react to being sexuall assaulted. Alot is about being in control and retroactively explaining this low-control situation to yourself in a way that you had the control to cope with it, which is why some people seek out their abusers for consensual sex afterwards to regain a feeling of control. Alot of fucked up things happen. There is content out there. Primary sources without a paywall. People (not just women) talking about their expe…
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/21 10:53 PM
1

Sounds interesting. Do you have sources for that 75% number at hand? What i read, that it rose 75%, not TO 75%. Meaning, that a base conviction rate (let's just pick a random 10%, i don't know, what the real base rate is) gets multiplied by 1.75 to 17.5%. Am i wrong here? The way i see it is, that the definition of rape was expanded (we can also see an increase in reports). Whether or not we agree with the expanding of definitions only really matters, when we read the laws themselves and get an …
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/21 09:27 AM
6

we aren't distant like the nordic countries, but not as open and outgoing as the US americans. Imagine it as having to surpass a threshold for random interaction on the streets. i.e. I need to know the time, so i'll ask for the time
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/21 01:09 PM
6

"The new legislation has not lowered the burden of proof, since the prosecutor has to prove that a crime was committed and they have to prove intent." - Secretary General Anne Ramberg How do you arrive at your conlusion?
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/21 01:05 PM
0

Just look through my other responses in this thread.
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/21 12:38 PM
0

and any adult teaching a child how to masturbate is a probably a nonce." Or you could try comprehensive reading. Not what i said.
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/21 12:37 PM
0

Knowledge about the existence of masturbation =/= showing them how to do "it"
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/21 12:05 AM
0

You mean to tell me, that the institution, where kids spend a major part of their upbringing is only meant to teach skills? Who are you trying to kid here? Me or yourself? Also "knowledge about the existence of masturbation" =/= "masturbation as a skill"
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/21 12:02 AM
0

I'm no expert here. Maybe i can tell you more after next semester, when i'll be tutoring for developmental psychology I. Children show exploratory behaviour at any age, and when it comes to their own body, that curiosity doesn't stop. Freud's findings among others are are antiquated, just to put this out there. They try out different roles (e.g. being asked with "What do you want to be when you grow up?" and answering with "A mom"), realize that different sensations are being elizited from diffe…
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 10:28 PM
-3

Sounds like we agree there. And we have to account for parents not telling their children, or demonizing/pathologizing that type of behaviour. Which is why i'd say, that it should be taught. Trust me, if they could just cut stuff like that from the curriculum, because the parents already teach it, they would.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 10:18 PM
-10

From very early on children left to their own devices will touch themselves. Why not inform them about it being a natural behaviour? Edit: Also, the video in question is talking about 10 year olds
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 09:01 PM
-25

Wrong. They don't teach masturbation. They don't teach anal sex. The information they give is that it isn't harmfull to engage in masturbation. That touching oneself doesn't mean they are sick. They don't teach the other way, that one is sick for touching oneself. Please, just tell me that this isn't part of some "the pedophiles up there, coorupting our kids" worldview
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 05:49 PM
1

How do you know?
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 05:06 PM
2

Could you expand on A? I don't seem to get the gist of it
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/21 07:43 PM
-1

Correct me if i'm wrong, but in most nations i know, feminist movements were against mandatory drafts and conservative forces worked to uphold this institution (e.g. the discourse in the 90s in the US)
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/21 07:53 AM
3

lmao, i get downvoted for claiming TM is a usefull concept aswell as TM. Wtf is this sub?
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 10:03 PM
3

i think, that there are alot of positive traits in masculinity. chivalry (i.e. standing up for your family, friends, those that can't defend themselves) nature of challenging/competivity (to foster growth) risk taking behaviour i can really appreciate these (and others) Now, these are traits, that are generally viewed positively, but imo can be expressed in a toxic manner, as in overprotectiveness, bullying or taking risks despite a negative risk/reward ratio. A person from pop-media, that i wou…
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 09:59 PM
-7

I'm not here to defend specific uses of these terms. Just their definition.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 06:29 PM
-7

If we assume that toxic masculinity as a reality exist, wouldn't we also be able to refer to similar bahaviours in women as toxic femininity? I'd argue, that there is utility in these terms, while having limitations.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 06:19 PM
1

add.: which would be consistent (though not entirely the same) with the modern useage of the word, as reffering to elements of stereotypically male behaviour that is toxic towards themselves and/or others
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 06:14 PM
6

He's not entirely correct: toxic masculinity doesn't referr to a feminization of men, but to immaturity in men Longwood, W. Merle; Schipper, William C.; Culbertson, Philip; Kellom, Gar (2012). "American men, religion and spirituality". Forging the Male Spirit: The Spiritual Lives of American College Men. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 06:12 PM
-22

How would you call toxic elements of a set of gendered behaviours?
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 06:04 PM
1

So we won't go further than "i intuitively know it". Got it. Have a nice day and take care :)
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 05:44 PM
1

Then at least support your argument with a source. The one you posted earlier isn't it
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 05:04 PM
1

Then why do you conclude, that the higher IQ of attractive people stems from their genes, when nothing of that sort was mentioned in the article?
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 04:36 PM
1

Ok. Let me change my first comment. What you were saying wasn't a joke, so please, don't speak about science. You obviously don't know how the scientific process works. Appeals to common sense are by definition unscientific. Just because you read pop science magazines, doesn't mean you know what's going on behind the scene. I highly encourage you to educate yourself, because getting just a basic understanding of how it works is alot of fun, eye opening and enriching.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 02:43 PM
0

This is not how psychology works. Get the study and look at the confidence intervals. Then, get the test manual and see whether or not one can actually make the claim of IQ ratings being distinct WITHIN one grouping: average, +-1std deviation and +-2std deviation. Limitations of the study just by looking at the article (which isn't the primary source): - no reliability of attractiveness ratings (e.g. inter-rater reliability) ("objective" attractiveness rating my ass) - the iq measurement of the …
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 11:05 PM
1

I know it's a joke (it's a joke, right?) But PLEASE never cite psychology research like this again
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 10:23 PM
2

Great, well that's my opinion too. How would you go about, trying to convince people that these types of jokes shouldn't be made, IF years of public discourse didn't lead to a change in behaviour (when it comes to assaulting women jokes)? Would, expressing the same sentiment, just in the other direction, to ellicit the same feeling of "hold up, why is this a regular joke to you?", be a valid strategy? (Again, IF rational discourse before hasn't lead to any meaningfull change) Personally i don't …
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/21 01:47 PM
1

what about disguisting and cringe?
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/21 12:48 PM
1

would you say the same about the joke i linked?
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/21 12:30 PM
1

https://ifunny.co/picture/my-wife-crashed-my-mustang-oh-no-is-she-hurt-DLcj1N1z7 Now, my estimation is, that oth of us would say, that this joke is: bad taste abhorrent an indication of a double standard, if "Kill all men" as a joke is being rejected So, i'd say, that as a society, we could do better, joke wise. Let's leave these jokes in the dark humour category and not in mainstream joking.
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/21 11:50 AM
1

empty platitude it is then
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/21 11:46 AM
3

Well, it seems like there was a slight misunderstanding. Are there any debate type performances where he excelled? I have no interest in people owning kids. Same with crowder, same with Shapiro
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 08:17 AM
6

Could you link a qualitatively representative ownage he dished out?
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 10:48 PM
1

Do you have any way to prove it, or is this comment just an empty platitude?
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/21 07:24 AM
-1

FYI: If you did a quick google of the hashtag, you'd find, that it is meant as a hyper-provocative way to say "jokes about violence against women is tolerated, but you feel attacked when we exchange women for men. What does that tell us about those jokes?"
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/21 08:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter