TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Void1702 Archive

View 1 post and 73 comments by Void1702 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
31

Void1702/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 05:34 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm looking through their comment history, and I don't see them defending Stalin or any shit like that, so not sure why you're calling them a tankie
/r/MensRights20/08/24 02:17 PM
0

If that's how you want to vote, then do not vote at all, because as I've already said, neither cares about men's issues
/r/MensRights20/08/24 01:58 PM
1

I don't have the data on hand anymore, no. The pandemic was years ago, in case you didn't notice.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 01:15 PM
0

Neither will do anything about men's issue. The question is do you vote for the one that will remove worker's rights or the one that wants to help poor people.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 01:02 PM
0

Every country was doing poorly, but some were doing worse than others, and the senile rich guy that told people to take horse tranquilizer and drink bleach didn't really help
/r/MensRights20/08/24 12:52 PM
-2

The economy lost 3 million jobs under Trump, and wages stagnated while corporate profits reached record highs
/r/MensRights20/08/24 12:33 PM
3

Y'all will really call anyone a tankie huh? Jreg and its consequences have been a disaster for political discussions
/r/MensRights20/08/24 12:02 PM
0

It's not like the republicans would've done a lot for men either tbh, less worker's rights and more tax cuts for the rich don't exactly help the average man
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:51 AM
2

The reason it was originally called that is because it was about the toxic cultural standards surrounding masculinity I say was because it practically lost all meaning nowadays
/r/MensRights13/08/24 01:40 AM
0

The problem with toxic masculinity, like with most things, is that it originally was a real and serious thing, but it got distorted once used outside of the group that created it What was originally "toxic masculinity" is still a very real problem that's affecting many people, but the word no longer describes it, as its meaning changed from "the social and cultural norms surrounding masculinity create a toxic environment for men" to "masculinity is bad", and therefore lost any value it had
/r/MensRights13/08/24 01:38 AM
0

No, the point was you changed the language then stated that’s been discredited by academics. I "changed the language" to clarify what I thought was the only logical interpretation of the message, because I (wrongly, apparently) assumed that you weren't that stupid If y'all actually believe that there's not a single man on this planet that benefits from it, you're morons That’s what you got from that exchange? One of the other people that responded to my comment seems to actually unironically bel…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:38 AM
-2

I didn't want to continue debating in this thread because the 10 minute timeout between each message is extremely annoying, and I didn't have the mental strength to debate someone who believed all women were part of some sort of global conspiracy, but I'm going to respond to yours, and only yours, for one specific reason: it's absolutely stupid Like, yeah of course it's going to benefit some people, did you think the patriarchy was just an orphan crushing machine that created pain and suffering …
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:43 PM
-3

1: the patriarchy wasn't "built". It's not something that half the population coordinated on in a big conspiracy. That's not how cultures work. 2: the oppression of "the patriarchy" is upheld by all members of society, not just men If you want to prove wrong the academics, you should at least make sure to get right the opinions of the ones you want to critique
/r/MensRights19/06/24 02:29 PM
-3

Your previous comment, in its entirety I can understand that some people hold both of these beliefs, but to claim that one is "part of" the other? What does that even mean?
/r/MensRights19/06/24 02:19 PM
-20

???
/r/MensRights19/06/24 02:09 PM
-30

I mean, yeah. For example, the term "fragile masculinity" was originally about one of the ways that "the patriarchy" oppresses men and is directly linked to the mental health crisis (though it's since been stolen by idiots who don't understand what it means)
/r/MensRights19/06/24 01:17 PM
-35

Isn't this kind of a strawman? Idk about twitter activists, but from what I've seen, the idea that the patriarchy benefits all men has been largely discarded by academics.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 01:00 PM
-8

Gender preferences in toys are demonstrated as early as 3 months old, well before the effect of social norms could be responsible. How is 3 month old too early for the effects of social norms? We, as social creatures, replicate what we see around us, especially as childrens Also I could cite the study "Dump the “dimorphism”: Comprehensive synthesis of human brain studies reveals few male-female differences beyond size", which is one of the biggest meta-study on the subject Your point about gende…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 09:33 PM
-13

There is no sexual dimorphism in the human brain, meaning that any difference of outcome is necessarily due to sexism, either directly (because women are paid less), or indirectly (because gender norms push them to take lower paying job). If there was no such gender norms, due to the abscence of sexual dimorphism, we would expect similar life choices on average (because of the law of large numbers) The other problems are real tho
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 09:03 PM
1

Why is it strange and suspicious to you? Here's the same part but the edited version i did 10 seconds after posting it bc idk my brain lagged "I am not saying that evolution is fake, i'm saying that explaining difference of behavior between gender/sex by it is clearly strange and suspicious." And the main reason i find it suspicious is because these types of arguments are mainly used by TERFs Can you define what you mean by "difference in how the brain works" ? I want to make sure that I'm under…
/r/Male_Studies05/06/21 02:27 AM
1

There have been attempts by many religions at debunking evolutionary theory, but I have not seen any convincing data coming from their camps. Not saying that there is none, but there isn't enough of the high quality studies to convince me in light of the alternative. I'm not saying this to insult any religions. But you all haven't given me much to work with in terms of data. Full disclosure, you're talking to a behavioral neuroscientist. So, I'll admit that I'm a little biased towards science. I…
/r/Male_Studies05/06/21 01:56 AM
0

If something uses "sexual selection theory", it's clearly suspicious, because a lot of studies have showed this theory stupid (edit: only for difference in behavior, should have made that clear), so. . . Edit: one of those is "Dump the “dimorphism”: Comprehensive synthesis of human brain studies reveals few male-female differences beyond size", look it up on Google, when i post a link the link breaks so i can only post the name
/r/Male_Studies04/06/21 06:22 PM
2

the name of the study is "Dump the “dimorphism”: Comprehensive synthesis of human brain studies reveals few male-female differences beyond size" You should be able to find it by googling the name
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 10:31 PM
2

Says you. This sounds like a dogmatic decree that is disconnected from observable reality. While a lot more research needs to be done, so far it does seem to suggest there are differences based in biology. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763421000804?via%3Dihub Why? Why can't we celebrate men and women and leave them as equally valuable, even in their differences? No social construct should be celebrated
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 10:24 PM
2

Justice shouldn't have this type of quotas, because it wouldn't create any model, and thus would not help at all in any way. What justice need is strict rules that determine which parent gets custody regardless of their gender For woman-dominated profession, yes, we should apply this type of quotas
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 10:19 PM
2

Yeah, i know, that's something to fix
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 10:17 PM
3

Until when we will discriminate against men ?! What? because gender quota started long ago and there is no change ! Yeah, it takes time, nothing new You know that there is more females in STEM in islamic countries like Jordan and Turkey than feminist countries like Sweden and Germany ? this mean it has nothing with gender stereotypes and everything to do with choice. men and women make different choices. there is nothing with that. That just show that each society's gender stereotypes affect ind…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 10:16 PM
2

Not taking a side is the same as supporting the status-quo. While on many issue, simply trying to achieve equality end up working, the one on gender is different, as it is rooted on the societal context There is no difference between how a man and a woman's brain works, yet on average, they make completely different carrier choices, this difference has to come from somewhere, and this somewhere has to be destroyed I might be wrong, but it seems to me that this "somewhere" are social norms
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 10:10 PM
-3

Basically, by forcing gender diversity, that helps to create diverse models for next generations to look at, and thus will help destroy gender stereotypes Yes, it's taking away from more effective people, and possibly reducing the money made by the group hiring, but that's a sacrifice that is worth It's a small sacrifice today to better destroy gender roles in the futur
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 12:49 PM
0

This is because of two things. 1/ The number of death is way more corelated by age than by gender, therefor making a policy simply based on age is way more effective than one based only on gender (and basing it on both would be too complicated to do effectively) 2/ As much as we would like it to be, the goal of the government is not to do good things. The goal of a government is to be re-elected. Therefor, if they must do something stupid to maximise their chance of getting re-elected, they'll d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 11:47 AM
7

well to be fair, your data shows that between 2019 and 2020, only the number of female suicide did go up, so technically she's not lying
/r/MensRights29/05/21 08:27 AM
1

While it is true that in modern country, the majority of poor people are men, it's not true in developping countries, and the places where the most people live are often the places least developped yet too. So it's completely possible that, if you look at the whole world, the majority of ppl suffering from poverty are women Also, i can't access the link you're giving
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 07:12 PM
2

The argument itself make sens from a utilitarian PoV, but the premise is wrong: the risk isn't small enough, and therefor it's not worth the risk
/r/MensRights20/05/21 04:44 PM
-9

And you somehow got 75 downvotes This sub is full of transphobic stuck in the past with no idea of what discoveries were made in gender studies in the last 20 years
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:40 PM
52

One of my friends once said "Only the beautiful think beauty doesn't matter in today's society", and while it wasn't about dating, i still think it fit there
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 02:45 PM
4

And even if that's the case for elephants (i searched and found no study), that isn't a proof that it's the same for humans. Humans and elephants are completely different species of animals, so there is no way to be sure it's like that.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:26 PM
-1

I'm not saying they are not, i'm mocking those that say that it's in their biology (i saw at least 3 of them in the comments)
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:24 PM
-4

When i saw this post, i was like "hey, the data isn't cherrypicked, the study is legit, maybe this sub has good sides too", and then the comment sections are just - "wOmEN aRe aLL gOlDiggER #rEdPIll" - "wOmEN aRe PIckY thAT's iN TheIr bIolOgy" If it's really people like that who defend equality, then it is a lost cause
/r/MensRights07/05/21 09:25 AM
3

Do you have study abt what you say on elephants? I can't find any real study
/r/MensRights07/05/21 09:23 AM
2

Are there any recent paper on the subject? this one is 10 years old
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:03 PM
2

an estimated 1.6% of women (or approximately 1.9 million women) were raped in the 12 months before taking the survey and The case count for men reporting rape in the preceding 12 months was too small to produce a statistically reliable prevalence estimate. vs an estimated 1.7% of men were made to penetrate a perpetrator in the 12 months preceding the survey sorry, but uh, the link you give doesn't give those numbers here's what the page says an estimated 19.3% of women and 1.7% of men have been …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 06:51 PM
-1

It's edited, u/awkwardtheturtle doesn't speak like that
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/21 12:24 PM
3

If you look at threads like this one, they get mass downvoted right now. There is someone just searching for these people saying a woman raped them, and deciding to downvote them and all the replies https://np.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/n5mobb/serious_male_rape_victims_whats_your_story/gx2lxw8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 10:43 AM
21

No you really have to be a superhuman to use this like really
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/21 04:56 PM
0

That just show that the part most visible hate mens, is there actual scientific data?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 03:40 PM
2

Thanks
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 03:30 PM
2

Where's the link of the wiki you're talking about?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 03:12 PM
2

Ok, two cases. Do you have actual data or just a list of cases?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 03:01 PM
2

That is just one case, i'm asking about real scientific data
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 02:59 PM
1

No, i'm waiting, if you have data show it, but if you don't then assume it
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 02:53 PM
-1

Do you have any data that this is what feminists are doing?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 10:29 AM
1

I didn't see the movie so i can't know, i've just read the summary on wikipédia, i have no idea how the movie is made and how it talk about gender norms
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 09:44 AM
-5

Is there actual proof that it is the majority?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 09:42 AM
-8

Do you have actual data on that?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 08:27 AM
1

I can't generalise, i don't know each of those people personally, but i have you a simple definition that can be applied to know who is a "fake feminist" and who isn't
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 08:26 AM
0

I never said that, don't make me say what i didn't, it's becoming obvious that you have no arguments
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 08:18 AM
-2

Do you have data on that?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 07:36 AM
-20

By definition, feminists fight for egality of genders, so if someone hate all men, they don't meet the requirement to be a feminist, so calling them fake feminist isn't the true scotsman fallacy Edit before i have answer using that: no, not the ethimologic definition
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 10:54 PM
0

Based
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 10:18 PM
2

Why exactly?
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 07:49 PM
0

Do you have any arguments against this?
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 07:49 PM
1

Yeah but if you trust a black man and he betray you, other black man won't say "you just shouldn't have trusted him"
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 07:49 PM
2

Yeah but when feminists do similar joke how do people here react?
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 07:14 PM
1

Like managing your sub with only you on it?
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 01:27 PM
0

1: i know it's a joke, i just saw it was offensive and not funny 2: here you go generalising again. Is that your only solution when you see facts? 3: Yeah sure, because you're a genius who know gender better than someone that studied it for years. Bruh your only achievement is creating a sub with only you on it 4: "i didn't say all woman without proof, i said most woman without proof"
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 01:26 PM
-1

1: you can't even recognise an argument when i show one can you? 2: if an argument who's axiomes are true end up being false, that mean the logic behind the argument is wrong 3: if you say you believe in science then come back when you have a phd in gender studies then, because saying that trans don't exist is factually wrong 4: yeah there's clearly enough proof already to know you're guilty of generalising and transphobia
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 01:12 PM
2

2: Google idiot and you'll find trump's face. Google results can easially be manipulated. Oh and i just googled "feminist" and they seems like average people 3: i'm using extreme exemples to show how those arguments don't work 4: does that mean that if i go and look at your previous posts i'll saw some making fun of the "fat neckbeard" stereotype? Or are you the type of people that make fun of every stereotype but those that affect them? I say that because i went in your profile, and all i saw w…
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 12:55 PM
-22

1: yeah but this isn't an excuse 2: you're generalising again, stop digging your own grave 3: this is the same excuse that's used by parents that traumatised their kids "oh but my mom did the same to me". If you were really victim of generalisations like this, you should try to reduce the number of generalisations and stereotypes, not the opposite! 4: you believe in true equality but you still generalise womens. Also, your friend aren't here, this is just the equivalent of saying the n-word and …
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 12:31 PM
-26

"i make generalisations about a group of people that are in majority womens and make fun of stereotypes but that doesn't make me sexist"
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 12:20 PM
-37

When i first saw this subreddit, i thought it was against radical feminism, but no, it's just disguised mysoginy
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 12:17 PM
9

Human*
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 04:28 PM
0

You know how here we aren't exactly against feminism in general but only the most extreme? Yeah you're the same but in the other direction. You're a shame to everyone here that want true equality. Go back in your cave and never comment again.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/21 01:00 PM
-6

Chivalry? What's the link between a code of honor and justice and respect that knight had to follow (but mostly didn't) and a door?
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/21 10:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter