TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Von_Buttmunchen Archive

View 1 post and 24 comments by Von_Buttmunchen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

CMVVon_Buttmunchen/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 11:53 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thanks to you too, for keeping it civil.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 12:13 AM
1

The dominance/submission thing is just the reality of the shared experiences of men comparing notes online. As it turns out, women tend to enjoy submitting to a man who knows how to give them "the tingles". When a man dares to let loose his inner caveman, so to speak, chances are he's going to experience positive responses from the women in his life. There are plenty of guys out there who've even revived their dead bedroom marriages by just daring to let loose their inner, subjugated masculinity…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 10:09 PM
1

I think you're seriously overestimating how much people know about TRP. Take this subreddit for example; This is a place that attracts people who are far more interested in - and far more conscious about - the inner workings of gender dynamics than the average person. Yet, very few people here have read the TRP sidebar, much less the literature referenced there. They think TRP = PUA. They think TRP = trad-conism. They think TRP = MGTOW They think TRP = inceldom/blackpill They think TRP is anti-f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 08:19 PM
8

The good: in a healthy setting, a woman who decides to marry someone won't marry them unless there is some threshold of attraction based on something that she sees in him I agree. Some women hold certain criterias so dearly that it can be enough to create attraction like him having control over his life, job, finances, his life story, sharing a political opinion, seeing him display affection towards babies or weaker people This, I don't buy. I'm not saying women don't want these things, but they…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 05:09 PM
14

Women going with Beta Bux just means that she trusted her frontal lobe over primal instinct. Which isn't always a bad thing Maybe not for her (although I doubt she would be happy with that too), but your blindspot here is: What's in it for him? That list of yours is all well and good, and I don't disagree with any of it. All very sensible and congruent with observable facts. But what you're forgetting is that guys too want something out of a relationship: 1) Get fucked and blow me like you mean …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 03:31 PM
1

Even a parent's love has conditions and boundaries outside of small children There are instances where parents are forced to cut out their children for various reasons, but I don't think that necessarily means they stop loving them. Why would you need someone to love you without conditions? I don't, quite to the contrary. I've always avoided like the plague serious relationships with women who have an overly romanticised view of how things work. Cause that's the person who isn't going to do the …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:25 PM
1

If your idea of "love" is that it's supposed to be unconditional, then love only exists from parent to child. I suppose it is a question of semantics. I'm fine with using the word "love" in the romantic sense, but it's important to then keep in mind that it's the kind of love that is rife with conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 02:41 PM
11

Who cares what they did with other guys? It's not really what it's about. The logic you're looking for is that women will make rules for guys they aren't into, and break rules for guys they're into. So by marrying someone who started off by making rules for you, you married someone who wasn't really into you. Hence the inevitable dead bedroom. So that thought of yours that you can't shake, definitely do no try to shake it. Cause it is the absolute truth. That's your gut feeling learning from exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 11:29 PM
7

If the idea is to live happily ever after, and to have sex with only one woman for the rest of his life, he's an idiot if he doesn't think with his dick too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 11:08 PM
1

I usually sort by "most controversial" when browsing Reddit, so that would suck for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 01:34 PM
1

Right now, it's probably a 6. I have a kid less than a year old, so at the moment I don't have enough alone time to fully recharge my batteries. I'm around people all the fucking time. At my day job: there's people. With my side hustle: there's people. I come home: there's people. But this too shall pass. As for declining happiness amongst people in general, I think that has a lot to do with doomsday cultism going mainstream. People who read newspapers and social media, and actually take those t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:50 AM
1

That's one of the things you have (close) male friends for.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 08:27 PM
20

Except for in an anonymous discussion forum like this, I'd advise against "pointing out double standards". If you've seen through the matrix, and you realise why female primacy is a thing, you also realise why pointing it out - and calling women out on it - is a pointless exercise. Nobody is going to switch around their biology, and abandon their instincts, just because you pointed out some "double standard" to them. Unless you're particularly well spoken or funny, that sort of behaviour is quic…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 10:43 AM
2

The friend zone does exist, but it's guys doing it to themselves. Not sure what you mean by "access to others", but if you mean what I think you mean, having female "wingmen" is a terrible strategy. Women want to fuck men who other women also want to fuck, not men who orbit other women. There is something inherently pathetic about a man allowing himself to be an orbiter, and other women will quickly pick up on that. Don't know if you're a man or a woman, but either way I'll try and put it in ter…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 09:22 PM
1

I don't have a specific number for you, but LTRs - not ONSs - is where women learn to be good at sex and everything else pleasant. It's a matter of context. I wouldn't want a woman who's routinely gotten fuck zoned by other guys. I don't mind a woman who's got primarily steady relationships in her backpack.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 11:43 AM
1

The error in your argument is thinking that "high n-count" = "more sex + good at sex", which probably couldn't be further from the truth. Take OP's case as an example: He is a 24 years old man, so likely a hypothetical girl for him would be the same age or slightly younger (possibly even a little bit older). He provides us with the number "no more than 5" as an expectation of his. Now, say he meets a girl who's been in 2-3-4-5 steady relationships by that age. Not exactly an outlandish scenario,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 11:31 AM
3

I know the term "red pill" gets thrown around a lot these days, but it's pretty much the antithesis to "black pill" and traditional conservativism. The only guys I see clamouring for virgins are either incels or trad-cons (or both). Besides, there's a world of nuance between having been passed around like a living fleshlight (red flag), and being a virgin with no experience (also a red flag).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 09:11 PM
4

I'm no authority on any particular "pill", but I do think you might have TRP confused with something else here. Blackpillers/incels or trad-cons perhaps?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:46 PM
2

I suppose I could guess what you're getting at, but would prefer it if you elaborate a little bit first.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:17 PM
14

A core fundamental of RP praxeology is that you yourself should strive to be the change you want to see in your life, and to establish and guide the course of your relationships how you want them to be. So while it's true that some women will have the capacity for adding value to your life, and others won't, I think it's a mistake to be overly focused on all the things "she should be like". Physical attraction and basic human qualities are of course important, but when guys start talking about s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 10:55 AM
1

You are 100% right, and I will. I had moment of childish insecurity when I wrote that.
/r/MarriedRedPill11/11/21 02:24 PM
1

Please don't use the term "n-count". It's very racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 08:05 PM
0

OYS #2 Me: 39, 179cm, 84,3 kg, body fat 24.4% (by tape), 1st year of marriage, kid less than a year old Goal: To be more methodical and consistent about training. Also, be better at STFU. Why: I'm not physically were I'd like to be at 39, which is due to laziness, inconsistency, winging it and a lack of ownership. I think my lack of STFUs is also partly due to me not liking the way I look. I'll be more at ease mentally, and a more real person, if I feel physically closer to my potential. How: We…
/r/MarriedRedPill09/11/21 06:23 PM
0

I have only one goal for now, and that is to commit for 12 weeks straight to the very basic training program I've been fucking around with, off and on, for the last 8 months or so, with no visible gain. No more skipping a week, a month or whatever, no more half-assing it at lunch break at work, and no more excuses to do nothing (physical) on a Sunday because football practice got cancelled. OYS #1 Me: 39, 179cm, 84 kg, body fat 24.4% (by tape), 1st year of marriage, kid less than a year old Tues…
/r/MarriedRedPill02/11/21 04:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter