| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menHey, I see your point, and it's a valid one. Being straightforward and direct in relationships isn't wrong at all. However, it's important to consider how this approach might impact your potential connections. Think about job interviews. Did you ever feel like the interviewer was genuinely concerned about your well-being, or were they solely focused on whether you fit the job requirements? It’s very black-and-white, isn't it? There's little room for emotions or relatability. In dating, I'm there… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/06/24 04:22 PM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menI am really glad, that You found a woman, that appreciates You and You appreciating her. She does sound to be very direct, which I can not generalize onto the most women, since being too direct, will end in an interview format, just like You described. Besides that, my advice is not to run around, manipulate, or hide intentions, but being mindful how to do it. Being playful, but also having the ability to be direct and acting accordingly to the situation and the needs of each individual particip… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/06/24 06:01 AM |
| 2 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menReally appreciate Your kind words, especially that You took time to understand my position. I do not want anyone just to blindly agree, or disagree, I would love people to argument their position and find common ground and solutions. I have seen the loss of hope, I experienced it, but here is the catch: "What is the alternative?", giving up and hating everything, is not a valuable nor a sustainable solution. I value finding solutions to problems, not problems for solutions. You brought up great … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/06/24 05:53 AM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menYour assumption that I haven't experienced both sides is off the mark. I've been in the position of not being able to find decent women, and I've also found decent women. After I started improving myself—as a person, a man, and a human being—things got easier. The changes you make in yourself reflect outwardly. Of course, we live in reality, not Lala-Land. Not everyone will value your improvement. In fact, some might react negatively because your growth highlights their own shortcomings. They mi… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 10:53 AM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among men"Well yeah, but just because men want a family and it's good for them to want that, it doesn't mean it's impossible to find a mentally sane girlfriend." It's like saying, 'Just because I want to be healthy and it's good for me, it doesn't mean I can find a single clean meal in 2024.' It's a bit extreme, don't you think? Your assumption here is that most women are insane, which is quite a leap. Sure, I agree there's a high likelihood that modern women will have feminist takes or a gynocentric vie… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 10:14 AM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menLet's keep it real here. Sometimes we end up projecting our own stuff onto others without even realizing it. Like if I say, "Nah, I don't dig that source you used. It's kinda repulsive and could turn off a lot of folks." I might be speaking from my own discomfort rather than what's actually best for the audience. For example, think of a time when someone criticizes a friend's presentation style, saying, "Hey, don't go with that academic stuff; it's too heavy." They could be projecting their own … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 06:13 AM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menYour actual position is against everything. What a bummer, I think that's called a hater.. Try nuanced approaches, Your way of thinking, is very Doomer way of thinking. Here is maybe something that makes it easier to understand: Origin of a Doomer This reflects decently your view, as I perceived it. Here is mine: From Doomer to Bloomer | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 06:05 AM |
| 0 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menLook, I'm cool with disagreements. The source I used was simply to highlight the original speech of the second feminist wave, nothing more, nothing less. You interpreted it as a conservative stance and threw everything out the window. Just because you disagree with one point doesn't mean everything else is worthless. That's black-and-white thinking. Take a step back and discuss it all, not just what triggers you. Let's have a good faith argument instead of condemning everything based on one poin… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 05:57 AM |
| 0 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menSo, you think being conservative means every argument is worthless? Flip it: having a leftist view makes it invalid? That sounds pretty dumb to me, but hey, to each their own. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 05:28 AM |
| -3 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menMy bad, You are throwing up, when You are finished, can you provide something other than the "Ick"? For example sources You use to evaluate, like articles, studies, or anything related that may make Your "opinion" to a legit argument. I would appreciate. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 05:25 AM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menI would strongly disagree with your last point. Most men would love to have a family. Choosing the path of least resistance just to avoid challenges leads to a path of doom. Hurt people hurt people, and misery loves company, perpetuating a harmful cycle. I would argue that men or women who actively choose not to have kids are adhering to Darwinism. They will cease to exist along with their beliefs, a form of natural selection. This isn't about the choice itself but understanding the "why" behind… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 05:19 AM |
| 5 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menVery valid point. That's why we as men need to understand social cues and learn early on how to read people, trust our instincts, and gut feelings. There will always be "red flags" you can identify and use to test women, to filter out those who might not be genuine. For example, women often use "shit tests" to evaluate if a man is truly confident and authentic. When a man meets a woman who likes him but isn't sure if he's being genuine, she might throw something annoying his way to see if he can… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 05:01 AM |
| 4 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menYou raise some great points. Simply "grinding it out" won't guarantee a successful life, but it will increase the likelihood. The opposite would be the MGTOW or Incel movements, both of which I believe are dead ends. These movements consist of men who are checking out because they can't find solid ground or honest guidance. "You are entitled to the labor of the fruit, but not to the fruit itself." - Bhagavad Gita Acknowledging systemic issues like discrimination and biases in divorce courts won'… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 04:46 AM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menDo you believe in being good faith and seeing humans, not sexual orientations or genders, at all? I bet this sneaky way to attack the person, not the content, feels bad, do not do it, unless you want to get and spread hate. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 04:23 AM |
| 0 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menYou want proof? That’s legit. However, demanding proof while only responding with, "I don't like how you're saying it and what you're saying right now," isn't a productive approach. Show us prove that feminism is supporting males. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 04:21 AM |
| 1 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menThat is a "normal" reaction @Mysterious-Zone-334 of @MelissaMiranti. Make it easy and intuitiv to read, at least a bit interesting, for someone who may not see the situation, from the perspective of males. Otherwise they won't even try to engage. Hit me up, and I can give you an advice to improve that easily and pragmatic. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 04:18 AM |
| 4 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menIndeed, it is better than nothing. The political left often blames men for anything and everything, telling them to "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" and asserting that men are where they are because they positioned themselves there due to being men. The right wing isn't much better. While they at least attempt to reach out to males, their message is often: "You are the problem, BUT, if you work hard, you'll get a house, a wife, and kids," without offering any pragmatic advice beyond saying … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 04:13 AM |
| 12 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menYou're absolutely right, Chris Williamson discussed this topic. According to research, women often choose more aggressive and sexually active men by choice. These men tend to hold more misogynistic views about women overall. In short, women are attracted to these "Alpha Chad" types because of their perceived attractiveness, and later assume all men are like them. Furthermore, there's an exclusive form of this behavior seen in some women, known as Hybristophilia. This is an extreme form where ind… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 04:02 AM |
| 2 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menSure feminist agenda is working; against society and aimed at men, who are the backbone of society. You don't have to listen to "male" (which is sexist in itself), but here is a mix of feminist women and men advocates being against it. Why Young Men Are Turning Against Feminism Why Gen Z Men Reject Feminism The article mentioned in the video and 2 feminist women: Men are lost. Here’s a map out of the wilderness. by Christin Ember The Terrible Truth Of The Modern Dating Crisis - Louise Perry (4K) | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/24 03:45 AM |
| 40 | The hypocrisy of conversations around gender roles and why the red pill wins among menThere's a reason why all these pills started showing up—Red Pill, Black Pill, and so on. Each one aims to fill the void men feel these days: the feeling of being unaccepted, unwanted, demonized, and stigmatized by feminists, and by extension, the mainstream. We live in a gynocentric society where men are constantly blamed and made the boogeymen of modern times. Even when two people have identical problems, if one is male, he's at fault no matter what. If the person is female, she's an angel, a v… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/06/24 05:56 PM |
| 1 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."Yea, I would say, it is the other side of the coin. Do You have a source for that, I would appreciate. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/06/24 04:15 PM |
| 1 | Nice misandrist female friends?Thetinmen is a great guy, I once found him in the Chris Williamson Podcast on YT. Both are great human beings. thank you. The Truth About The Patriarchy: Men Don't Benefit Anymore - George TheTinMen Why Do The Left Not Care About Men’s Problems? - George TheTinMen | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/06/24 03:59 AM |
| 2 | Nice misandrist female friends?Thank you a lot! I try to be as clear and precise as possible while keeping things at least a bit interesting to read. Really appreciate it! | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/06/24 03:54 AM |
| -2 | Nice misandrist female friends?Exactly what I asked, who are you as person and what was the content of the conversation. Who initiated it, and what roles did each of you play, which arguments were used? Did you actually find common ground, or do you only think, you found common ground? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 19/06/24 12:28 PM |
| -6 | Nice misandrist female friends?Hoppla, I really hit a nerve, didn't I? Are you confusing self-centering with self-care? I've had the same feeling with my sisters. I asked you kindly and openly to talk about the content of the conversation, but you're hiding something, which indicates that my statement above might be true. Feel free to show us the reverse, or are your emotions more valuable than your (male) friends' feelings and the truth? I've made talking openly sexist statements near me by my sisters, their worst option. If… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 19/06/24 04:58 AM |
| 1 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."The real problem is that men's issues are not addressed openly. Instead, we keep repeating that women have it very bad, which skews society's views. Repeat a lie often enough, and people will believe it; this is called the normative force of the factual. At one point, it was true that women depended heavily on men for a sustainable lifestyle. Leaving a man often meant "economic death" or a life of hardships due to social stigma. However, this isn't true today. Yet, the constant repetition by wom… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 19/06/24 04:39 AM |
| 3 | Nice misandrist female friends?Absolutely, I'm on a decent path for sure. I don't worry about the Men VS Bear question or feeling bad about the stupidity of others. However, I do worry about losing respect for my sisters, as it doesn't feel reciprocated. That's my real pet peeve; I can't just give respect anymore when it's not deserved. PS: Not talking about human dignity. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 08:20 PM |
| 3 | Nice misandrist female friends?Absolutely, you've made a great point. Some people aren't worth the time, energy, or emotions, and it's crucial to recognize that. For me, this is just the beginning of a long journey. If I choose someone, I accept them with all their good and bad qualities. Simply saying "goodbye" and walking away isn't a sustainable solution for me. There will come a day when the same situation arises again, and I want to be prepared to handle it—for my future wife and children. I understand that I may need to… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 08:12 PM |
| 3 | Nice misandrist female friends?In a nutshell, You are describing Opportunity Cost. Make room for some who deserves it, that's legit. But there must be a way to communicate it more effectively, in their mind it is real, their emotions are too stronk. My "emotions" are telling me: "Address the underlying problem, from a place of mercy and not taking it too serious." Sounds easy, but it ain't simple. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 07:46 PM |
| 3 | Nice misandrist female friends?Ahhhh I got it, I am stupido. Well played Melissa +10 respect. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 07:27 PM |
| 3 | Nice misandrist female friends?I don't really understand your position. "Facts don't care about feelings." -Ben Shapiro. I see it the same way. I'm neither left nor right; I consider myself an ethical and pragmatic centrist. I do what works, but not at any cost. "A woman may think that the man in the woods is the worst person alive, but a man immediately sees himself as that man, and sees women saying they'd rather die than meet him." What do you mean by that? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 07:14 PM |
| 2 | Nice misandrist female friends?All true, but not very specific. Can you provide some examples? For instance, I've saved over 500 studies to rewire my brain towards logic and truth. Many people have strong opinions, but even more often, they lack any real understanding. I've learned to see people as they truly are and stopped listening to their words alone. Instead, I watch and observe their actions. I'm decent at communication and have a deep love for psychology. This is especially helpful in logical conversations. However, i… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 07:10 PM |
| 27 | Nice misandrist female friends?That's true, and here's the catch: One of my sisters, just a year younger than me, practically fed me feminist ideology. As a very impressionable and naive person, I was overly sensitized by her to the needs of women. I understood how women might feel in various situations, recognized that there are bad men out there (albeit a small percentage), and learned how to validate emotions and work through them with a female perspective. I lived as a feminized man until everything fell apart. I began to… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 07:03 PM |
| -4 | Nice misandrist female friends?What were the arguments of the discussion, I had the same with sisters and posted the story too. I would like to hear, who said what, who brought it up and why did you felt like, he was talking to you like a child? You said you were aggressive and he was condescending. Where did it start? Edit: Hey everyone, to those who downvoted this open and respectful question, what's going on in your mind. Asking questions to understand the situation helps uncover the truth. If you're against that, what doe… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 06:52 PM |
| 5 | Nice misandrist female friends?Great mindset, and I appreciate the thoughtful approach. It's true that those deeply entrenched in their views can be hard to reach. But what about those close to us? For them, ignorance might be bliss, but it's hell for a conscious mind. I’m curious to hear about the golden nuggets you use against misandrist talking points. What are the most common points you encounter, what are your go-to strategies, and can you understand why people think that way? I come from the perspective of "Hurt people,… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 06:42 PM |
| 27 | Nice misandrist female friends?Different People, Same Problems: The "Men vs. Bear" Question I have two sisters, both incredibly smart and educated (university level). I love them dearly. One is a radical feminist, though she might not realize it, and the other is a natural diplomat. Recently, I posed a thought-provoking question to both: "What would you rather meet in a forest, a man or a bear?" Without hesitation, both chose the bear. Curious, I asked why, mentioning that only a small fraction of men are actually dangerous c… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 06:34 PM |
| 1 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."Whenever sexual assault (SA) is mentioned, it’s common to hear arguments about the so-called "dark figures" — the cases that go unreported, where perpetrators are not convicted. There are many reasons why women might not report SA or may retract their statements, including fears of false accusations and potential jail time. This leads to the argument that the "dark figures" are even higher. While it’s impossible to prove or disprove this statement with certainty, as we can't verify the legitimac… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 11:21 AM |
| 6 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."Men die more often from suicide, war, homelessness, and drug addiction. Yet, the focus often shifts to the women who have to live with the loss of these men. I really want to understand how this works. I enjoy watching the Whatever Podcast. Often, the question arises: "Who is the victim of war, men or women?" About 80% of women say women. It's a complex and deep-seated delusion or something. What do you think, guys? Where is that coming from? I guess it may be the interpersonal victimhood mechan… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 05:08 AM |
| 4 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."Wish you good luck—you've got this! But be prepared for any scenario. Indeed, right now, women are often preferred in the job market. A less qualified woman might be chosen over a more qualified man. I've heard comments like, "We already have so many males; it would look bad." While this isn't the case 100% of the time or everywhere, you'll likely notice patterns once you start observing. The best you can do is be their top option and make it easy for them to pick you. It would be very interesti… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 03:32 AM |
| 6 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."As feminists often say, the "dark digits" must be very high. In today's world, is there any metric where women actually have it way worse? All the metrics I know show that men are the silent victims: in school, university, and crime. Perhaps sexual assault is an exception, but what if we include all the males in prison who got sexually abused and the boys exploited by female teachers? Even in the 2023 study on homicide, the narrative continues to portray women as the primary victims. It's insane… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/24 03:13 AM |
| 6 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."This will be a very very hard one.. Boys and men are literally falling behind in education, the workplace and especially in universities. This is a long-term issue that requires societal acknowledgment. Unfortunately, I don't believe the state will address it until it's too late, nor will society see any problems here. I would even go so far and say, we live in a gynocentric society in the western world. In the meantime, find some brothers, discover your calling, and as cheesy as it sounds, be t… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/06/24 04:33 PM |
| 9 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."I really love and hate the idea. I think You are right, if it is framed a lá, it will help women, it will be more impactful. But damn, this is how the entrance to hell, feels like, for sure. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/06/24 01:15 PM |
| 36 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."There is even a study on sexual harassment that highlights a key issue: women sometimes report harassment where there is none, while men tend to not recognize what constitutes sexual harassment. For example, touching a woman you don't know might be considered a big "no-no" by her, and she may feel harassed. Meanwhile, a man might simply think, "I got touched, huh, what a day." I'm not talking about extreme cases here, but about the smaller incidents. Here's the catch: it seems that this percepti… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/06/24 11:25 AM |
| 8 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."I am really unsure, if you can contest shame with respect. https://medium.com/dear-nephew/how-to-become-bulletproof-from-weaponised-language-of-shame-and-insults-5f06a0a66480 | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/06/24 11:14 AM |
| 30 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."Absolutely, you're right. This phenomenon even has a name: it's called Gamma Bias. I bet you've never heard of it. Gamma Bias refers to the overperception of women as victims and the underperception of women as perpetrators (seen as "pure little angels"). Conversely, men are overperceived as perpetrators and underperceived as victims. It often feels nearly impossible to acknowledge that men can be harmed or even that men have feelings. It kinda an open secret, 2 more examples: - In England, you … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/06/24 11:13 AM |
| 37 | [Canadian Government] "Significant numbers of men in Canada experience intimate partner violence (IPV), though it is rarely discussed. In research, policy and service delivery, more emphasis tends to be placed on violence against women (VAW) — and rightly so."Oh boy, more people are waking up. This year, a study on intimate partner violence against men in Germany was released, and the numbers are catastrophic. The possibility of experiencing violence as a male in a partnership is around 55%. Shockingly, 92% of men who experienced violence never reported it to the police. Men who earn less than their wives or are househusbands are at the greatest risk for violence in their partnerships. Source: KFN Study on Men and Partnership Violence I couldn't find… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/06/24 11:08 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter