TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vortex30 Archive

View 0 posts and 121 comments by Vortex30 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Bahrain and the UAE are not exactly accomplishments, they've been leaning in that direction for a long time too, recognizing Israel, there just wasn't enough grift being offered for them to do so. Trump brought the grift, so they did it.. If one can get Saudi Arabia or Iran on board, THEN you've accomplished something of note.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/20 09:28 PM
2

Today I learned globalist billionaires are women...
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/20 09:25 PM
5

It is actually true in the long-run. In about 100 - 200 years, if some of the worst climate change predictions become true, the USA will be a vast desert, Canada will be a tropical paradise rich in untapped resources and land for people, we will take on tons of refugees from America and the world leading to a population boom, we're already industrialized and wealthy, the North-West passage will become a new trade route, extremely strategic to have especially if Canada is able to charge for use o…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/20 09:22 PM
7

I don't even fucking WANT a men's day, I couldn't give less of shit, but if you ARE going to do a men's day... Don't fucking make it ALL about women, wtf is that shit?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/20 09:19 PM
1

Meth psychosis, for the rest of her days.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/20 09:15 PM
2

It is totally appropriate. If you prefer COVID Idiots, we can go with that, but that just sounds stupid compared to COVIDiots.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/20 09:10 PM
17

They didn't charge her for the pills even?? EDIT Read the link, she got charged with all of this: three counts of aggravated assault, and one count each of resisting arrest, drug possession and weapons misconduct. Sure, no attempted murder... That may require actually inflicting bodily harm on someone that could kill them though? Which she didn't... She attempted attempted murder, lol, and failed miserably at the attempt. I'm not a lawyer, maybe simply pulling a gun then being stopped is attempt…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/20 09:37 PM
7

She pulled out her firearm when they tried to arrest her..
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/20 09:37 PM
5

Who the fuck sucks dick for weed, lmfaooooo. Something straight outta Half Baked.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/20 09:25 PM
1

If Trudeau really wanted all victims to be believed to a point that accusation = guilt of the accused, then he'd legislate that, because he can. But he didn't, because he doesn't want to. Very simple, reality based, understanding of the situation. Instead you take a single statement, extrapolate upon it by taking it to the absolute most literal extent, and that now defines the leader for you forever. I didn't attack you. I said it how it is.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:42 PM
-3

Nah, it's pretty simple my man. You're a victim of outrage culture. It's quite cute on you though! You sound like an outraged feminist. It's beautiful how these things come full circle. The vast majority of us can infer what he meant, because we're not on the hunt for something to be outraged over. It is why most Canadians are not outraged over this, and you're all sitting here like, "How can't you see this!!!" It's because its not there, unless you're actively searching for it. So cute!
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:38 PM
0

All he's saying is believe them to an extent that a case is opened, and they're not turned away. It is just people on this sub, who think he wants to corrupt the "innocent until proven guilty" mantra, because whether you guys like it or not, you are a part of the outrage culture that is sweeping the West. Its hilariously emasculating of you all, ironically. He's not saying, accusation = a crime was committed by the accused. He's saying accusation = a case should be opened. Because so many times,…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:27 PM
-1

No victim has come forward to accuse Trudeau of any wrong-doing. Sorry to burst your bubble, but at this stage, this is just fluff. Him not-stepping down, over this, is not hypocrisy at all unless you're a shill just grasping for the slightest hints of hypocrisy. Until an actual victim emerges, nothing wrong here. No one was suspended over right wing tabloids accusing them of anything. Trudeau never stated that right wing tabloids ought to be believed. This. Is. Fluff. And you've all fallen for …
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:19 PM
0

Accused, yes, by actual humans coming forward and accusing them. Not some right wing tabloid accusing them of something all parties involved with have continued to move on from to this very day. This is way, way different, until or unless an actual victim emerges.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:15 PM
0

Yup. There isn't even an accuser here. There is no victim coming forward. Just a tabloid digging something up that no party felt wronged over and all moved on from.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:14 PM
0

Where's the woman accusing Trudeau of wrong-doing? I don't see her anywhere. This is just a tabloid digging something up that all parties involved have moved on from and don't feel bad about. There is no "case" here. This is a non-issue without a victim coming forward.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:11 PM
1

Apology in Canada is not an admission of guilt. Trudeau is saying no wrong-doing occurred. He apologized, and all parties have moved on to this very day. That to me, would indicate that indeed no wrong-doing occurred. "Handling" somebody is not "wrong" if the "handled" party leaves the incident feeling like they haven't been wronged. Which evidently is the case here, so...
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:09 PM
1

Hahahahahahhahaha you're fucking joking right?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:08 PM
0

Because there is no story here. Something happened, he apologized, and both parties moved on and never brought it up again, to this very day. There's no current accusations here. There's no victim coming forward. Until then, this is not news, this is meant for tabloids like The Sun.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:06 PM
1

The Sun isn't credible. The article from 2000 is cute and all, but no victim has come forward with any current allegations. It would appear to me, that all parties involved have moved on. Except for The Sun. Who actually were not involved at all and have no idea what transpired, they're just White Knighting, so nevermind.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:04 PM
1

Too bad there's no alleged victim coming forward in this case...Go figure.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:02 PM
1

Which is not illegal.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:01 PM
2

Yeah, no victim has even emerged. There are no accusations, other than from The Sun, a right wing tabloid. Some interaction occurred, the details of which we know nothing of. Trudeau apologized. Apparently the woman felt the apology was perfectly adequate for what occurred and has moved on for 18 years and still has yet to emerge as an actor in this saga. The Sun just dug up some tiny op ed from a local newspaper from the year 2000, brought it up to Trudeau, and he said, yeah, nothing wrong happ…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:59 PM
1

See him doing what? Having an interaction with a woman and apologizing and all parties moving on with their lives? Yeah I can see that too. Nothing bad happened here, there is no victim coming forward. Trudeau is denying any wrong doing, because there's simply no "wronged" individual coming forward! This is all pretty laughable. Until a victim actually emerges, it is safe to say she probably felt like the apology was a proper amends for the act. In reality, what probably occurred was he touched …
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:53 PM
1

Trudeau said victims/accusers should be believed, right? Where is the victim/accuser, I ask you? The Sun? The Sun wasn't involved. The woman? The woman isn't accusing Trudeau of any wrong doing, and he is saying he did nothing wrong. Case closed.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:49 PM
2

There are no allegations from an affected party. All parties involved have moved on with their lives happily for 18 years. It is just The Sun digging up an event that happened privately between two people, neither of which feel like a victim of said event. This is tabloid journalism at its finest and you are all eating it up like schmucks.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:47 PM
0

Except no individual has come forward and accused him of that, so...There's no "victim" here to be "believed". There's a person who he may have touched, apologized to, and quite apparently, she accepted the apology. That's not a victim. That's not an accusation. That's an event that happened and all parties moved on from it happy. It happens every day.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:45 PM
-1

Where's the accusation of wrong-doing here? I don't see it. Trudeau touched a woman in 2000, allegedly, apologized, and she's moved on for 18 years and has never come forward with an accusation of wrong-doing. The Sun is currently acting as a White Knight accuser for a woman who apparently does not feel she was wronged. Very different situation from the others I am reading about. This is a right-wing tabloid, digging up an opinion piece from a local paper from the year 2000, in which Trudeau may…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:39 PM
1

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-kent-hehr-resigns-over-sexual-harassment-allegations/article37733581/ You mean this case?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:26 PM
0

I don't think he stated that the police should not look into this matter. He stated his innocence. That is perfectly in line with his beliefs. He's never said that the accused can't deny the allegations. He's said allegations should be taken seriously/believed by the police upon first allegation, and then looked into further. There's no hypocrisy here, unless he actively prevents an inquiry.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:25 PM
2

It's ok man, it happens lol! For what it's worth I don't think his point was that he thinks you're a predator. I think his point was that if we're to believe that men who claim to be feminists, are only doing it to get closer to their prey, then it'd be also reasonable to believe men who are teachers and nurses only did that as predators to become closer to their prey as well, which we all would agree isn't really true most of the time. He was just kinda pointing out a double standard on this su…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:18 PM
3

I'd say just don't worry about it too much and it'll more likely than not never become an actual problem in your day to day life. Most of this drama only exists on the internet. Very little of it is real.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:13 PM
1

I mean, we never expected anything more from you son, well done :)
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:10 PM
-5

Yes, we should believe them to an extent that we open up an inquiry, be that simply looking into it further (bringing the accused in for questioning, or whatever) or laying charges and bringing the case to a court, etc. It doesn't mean the thief is "guilty" once accused, or ought not to deny the allegations if they're false. It is that we listen to the shopkeeper and open up a case. Trudeau is denying the allegations, he's not saying that the police shouldn't look into this further though. I see…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:59 PM
0

Just so everyone here knows, "The Sun" is essentially Canada's version of Breitbart, so there's that..It is essentially a right wing tabloid these days, not journalism.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:54 PM
1

What's this even really supposed to say/prove...? Your paychecks aren't very big or anything, and your role in society is a necessary one so why wouldn't we pay the bare minimum to have that role fulfilled...? Just kinda a weird thing to bring up here..
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:39 PM
-1

Kinda like some men who become teachers and nurses, etc? Got it. I don't agree with any of this conversation by the way, not that feminist men are predators nor that teachers/nurses are. There's men that are predators, and they exist in all professions and belief systems. Just like the women that are predators. Some probably do purposely go for the roles we are discussing here, but the conversation is stupid because we can't possibly gather the numbers to prove any which way, and nurses/teachers…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:35 PM
7

It would've been nice if when women started going to work that they'd only do it if the family was struggling to make ends meet, or if they could pull in more money than the man, then the man stop his work and fill in the more classic role of the woman at home. But no, fuck you all, we want jobs and we'll take down an entire economic system with it, so that all families require two working parents and the children and housework can all just go to shit. Of course, greed, initially when two income…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:49 PM
1

I have anxiety and panic attacks, and oh what's that, a benzodiazepine script too! Was quite easy to get. Here, in Ontario. So yeah, I know the pain, and i know the medical system. You sound like a loser who never took care of himself (no family doctor at 28 years old? Wtf..) and all you had to do was ask for a referral to a psychiatrist, who will prescribe appropriate meds. Cmon, how stupid can you be to be unable to get meds for anxiety in this over medicated society when any drug addict witho…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 03:51 PM
4

Ya this place has entered a whole new level of paranoid stupidity I see. First the women were after us, but I did not care, for I was not a mysogynist nor a pussy. Then the browns and communists were after us, but I did not care, for I was not a paranoid racist. Then the MRAs were after us, but I did not care, for this sub is now a joke.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:39 PM
-1

Who the fuck goes to the ER with a massive panic attack? People like you are the ones that cause the 12 hour wait time, going in with non-serious issues. Go see your family doctor, get a referral to a psychiatrist and get some Xanax for the next one. Don't clog up our already clogged ER with a panic attack! Panic attacks don't even last 12 hours, don't care how massive. So you should have left many hours earlier even if earlier on you felt it was a serious issue.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:37 PM
10

This only happens if you voluntarily claim it on your tax return (both people). Otherwise the government is unaware, and/or does not consider it a common law relationship. Basically, this can only benefit people who wish to be seen as married under the law, without the rigmarole of getting married. It doesn't fuck over guys who live with their gf for one year, don't worry folks.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:28 PM
1

I don't think they need to find us, as short men, the epitome of physical attraction, and don't take this as another bait and switch its just early and I'm trying to find my words still lol, give some leniency and you get my point. My point is that you can still find a good looking woman who will love you for life, or for a year or whatever depending on how other factors click lol, as a short guy. I honestly doubt the groups that enjoy fat women truly think fat women are the epitome of physical …
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:02 PM
3

Maybe Lord Farquad was made fun of for his shortness by the people of Duloc (I think it was called that?) because he had so many other, non-physical features that were detestable, but the shortness was the easiest thing to pin down and make fun of, so the people, as well as himself, focused primarily on that one...? What I'm trying to say is, short guys who can't get with any women need to take a long hard look away from the mirror, and to the inside, and realize that maybe, just maybe, there ar…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:27 PM
0

You don't think there's a sub culture of women that like, or at least accept into their lives as viable mates, shorter guys? I assure you there is... I'm 5'7" and have been with both a very good looking girl, way out of my league in terms of physique IMO, who happened to be a total bitch lol, as well as a more over-weight girl who is a total dream to be with (and waaaaaay better in bed) and I'm happy as can be with the bigger girl. But it was no issue getting with the very good looking one as we…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 10:51 PM
8

So that's why it's called a werewolf? Like a man-wolf? Neat.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:27 PM
1

I mean if you agree that 97% number, in the image of this post, means, and should state "97% of Combat deaths from war are men" I have absolutely no problem with that. My "stupidest comment of the day award" was merely trying to state that the original image did not clarify that number to be combat deaths, and that including civilian brings that number down. Because the image said war deaths, which is highly misleading. I think we're in agreement, and the image is misleading, and that was the wh…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:27 AM
1

I can't even follow you anymore. Your comment said 99.999% of American combat deaths. 97% of WAR DEATHS ARE MEN was what the post claimed, which I rejected in my OP, stating I think that it is more like 97% of COMBAT deaths, and that civilian death inclusion would bring this number down significantly (but I was wrong in thinking it'd be a 50/50ish split), so I tried to correct the post, saying "97% of combat deaths * FTFY" and that including civilian deaths brings this number down greatly. 81% t…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:18 AM
1

All your second link is citing is "violent war deaths" it makes no distinction between civilian or combatant. It may be ALL civilian, or it may be a combination I am not sure it does not even specify. To me "violent war deaths" = anyone who died as a direct result of combat, whether it be someone with a gun, or someone caught in the cross fire. You may have thought it further proved your point, but as far as I can tell it actually completely disproves what the post here was trying to assert. 81%…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:08 AM
1

My only gripe was that 97% of war deaths seemed highly suspicious. I may have been off base in my assumption that women would make up ~50% of civilian deaths, but clearly, they make up well in excess of 3% of all war deaths, more like 19%, a 6.33x multiplier of dead wrong facts, which people on this subreddit just ate up like gravy, and down voted the only voice which questioned that number. And now you provide me a source which proves that 97% number is complete and utter bullshit. So what else…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 02:59 AM
1

Soooo.....97% is, in fact, very wrong.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 02:57 AM
1

Are you fucking serious dude? Females make up 50% of the population, why would they NOT account for approximately 50% of CIVILIAN deaths? EDIT http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2013/07/11/male-victimhood-in-armed-conflict/ Alrighty, so, we see this here article, very pro-men, I can't seem to find anything that backs up my earlier claims, clearly male civilians are targeted more than female (makes sense), I did see one link that for AIR RAIDS females account for 46% of deaths in the Iraq War,…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 02:31 AM
0

Then correct me. The fucking picture you like so much didn't even spell "oppresses" properly. This post is garbage.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:58 PM
-6

97% of war combat deaths * Civilian death toll tends to match or exceed the death toll of combatants, and logic tells you ~50% of those deaths would be women.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 02:27 PM
3

I'm just here out of curiosity. I've been very careful with the types of girls I date, so haven't experienced anything close to that. Frankly those things don't scare me nearly as much as being 40 years old with no family, fucking a greasy sex doll who's pussy I need to remove and wash each evening. Or how about being 75 and having nobody left who loves you in the world, and nobody willing to take care of you as you die alone. Yeah those things scare me way more than the very unlikely scenarios …
/r/MGTOW18/01/18 06:08 PM
0

You get anxious from fucking a woman? Are you certain you are not gay?
/r/MGTOW18/01/18 02:31 PM
1

How do you deal with the cum and sweat and shit that gets all up inside her? Is the vagina removable and basically just a fleshlight? Fleshlights reeeeeeally don't feel close to as good as a vagina.
/r/MGTOW17/01/18 11:02 PM
3

Same here, I honestly don't even recall this part of the book. I don't recall a lot from late high-school though...
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:09 PM
6

Well the unfortunate one is dead, so I mean, we can't really help him anymore.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:35 PM
3

She gave so many cares...
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:34 PM
0

I don't fear for my life due to feminism because I know the only powers women have, and will ever have, are those that men have allowed them to have. May sound bad, but it is true. These powers could all be taken away at the drop of a hat if things truly became too horrible for men. As it stands right now, we get screwed over in certain situations (courts, usually), there's certain issues where men do suffer more and we should advocate for/look into (genital mutilation in the West, suicides, cer…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:30 PM
1

She kinda sounds like an idiot to me anyways though, like the women she berates in her article, freaking out over people saying there are more than simply physical differences between men and women in the comments. Those same hormones that cause physiological differences that she agrees exist? Yeah well, they work in the brain/mind as well. EDIT Nevermind, apparently that is the blog owner writing those parts, rather than the guest writer. Which is fitting...
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:42 PM
4

lol I'm not sure what to do with this information you have given me here, but I feel uneasy now... :p
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:37 PM
34

That's offensive to people who are actually retarded, don't be a mongoloid idiot.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:59 PM
2

I'm guessing here, but I imagined when I read "sexting" that indeed naked images of each other were exchanged. I could be completely wrong though. And I know that's not technically what sexting is, but...5 years, for what, saying you're so hard right now to a 15 year old? Nahhhh
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:52 AM
1

How dare you!
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:09 PM
6

Yup, get rid of the gendered naming and allow both boys and girls in both.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:41 PM
1

Lol that's still a super effective knock out punch, utilized more often than a dominant hand hook.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/17 02:30 PM
4

Also many female professional fighters are chemically male anyways, whether by illegal use of PEDs or natural genetic luck of the draw.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/17 02:27 PM
12

Seeing as Rousey's only weapons are arm bars and judo throws, maybe he stands a chance? :p Head moooment! Head moooment! No Rhonda, nooo, noooooo!
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/17 02:25 PM
0

But but I heard the pain of child birth is like 1000x the pain of being kicked in the balls (they even made up a units system for measuring pain which doesn't exist) and look how well women handle child birth right? (ummm...) therefore women have higher pain tolerance than men! Or some such bullshit. Oh, and have you ever seen a man with a cold? Poor baby! Therefore women > men or so I've heard.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/17 02:22 PM
3

lol i love it! smh..
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/17 09:48 PM
1

He obviously had no formal training in grappling, or he would have easily taken her down and put himself in a dominant position over her, as she is TINY and also clearly has no formal training.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/17 05:56 PM
10

Almost as if she's not new to this behaviour.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/17 05:35 PM
3

They all look like kids on their first day of boxing class. At least they've got their hands up...I guess...But those punches look pathetic.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/17 05:21 PM
19

Totally read this comment to the tune of Stayin' Alive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFOvHmFDQuk
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/17 05:10 PM
35

This is kind of annoying because we have no idea what happened after police arrived. Was she arrested? I'm thinking not, or else surely this guy filming would have included that part as well. She has a freaking side-kick show up all of a sudden, saying she saw a man hitting a woman (when the fuck did that even happen? the worst I saw him do is grab her wrist at one point), literally willing to sacrifice this bouncer's freedom in order to protect this drunk obnoxious woman who's assaulting him, o…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/17 03:41 PM
10

I actually wash my penis, you can only get so "clean", all of my girlfriends never mentioned it once except to compliment what a "beautiful" cock I have, they love how sex feels with me and for whatever reason I've been told over and over again that sex just feels better with me (could be the intact foreskin, could be technique, curve, size, a combination of all this), and I'm certain I last longer in bed than you (ah, opiates, bless you) AND it feels better for me and my partners than it does f…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:43 PM
2

Here in Canada I'd say the majority of Men's rooms have changing tables. I thought this picture was something to do with a private changing table, out of sight from other people in the washroom, or maybe something to do with a bunch of stalls and no urinals...? But I'm sure urinals are on the left, just out of shot. So yeah...As a Canadian, was kind of confused by this post..
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:49 PM
-1

Nope, I think this post is stupid and doesn't further the discussion at all. "Wow, one person helping another!? Unthinkable that that person would be a man." Nobody thinks like this. We all know that men and women do incredibly helpful, selfless deeds every single day. The idea of Feminism and MensRights should be to look at genders as a whole, not cherry pick examples of good deeds and be like, "Check mate feminists, a man did a good thing."
/r/MensRights29/08/17 01:20 AM
-1

You know there are probably a bunch of women helping out the people of Houston too, as well as a bunch of men nearby NOT helping out (for all we know, you may be within driving distance of Houston, yet not stepping up to help, and quick to come online and say, "look at all the good we men are doing!"). As well as a bunch of women near by not helping out. Stop with the identity/division politics. People help people. Some people turn up the opportunity to help people. Gender/sex has no real bearin…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 08:17 PM
1

That's fair man, good luck to you and your relationship! I hope I'm in camp #2 currently, but I'll be taking my time to be certain. My one other long term relationship ended pretty disastrously, so I'm not gonna rush into anything or force it.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:06 PM
2

Fortunately for me I'm not successful at all, feels good for once man. True love awaits! Oh wait.. :( No seriously I'm in a very happy relationship.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:52 PM
3

What about the common law thing where they basically consider you to be married anyways after a certain time? How do you both have a long term partner and not get screwed over potentially?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:49 PM
0

Your wife kinda sounds like a loser..? And you seem pretty ok to go along with and indeed enable those ways?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:45 PM
3

So if my gf makes and has way more money than me I'm good and don't need to worry right?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:42 PM
-6

Wait, they split up because of domestic violence, but she's the bad one? Or was she the abuser, and Depp didn't want it to get out because it would emasculate him (so he believes anyways).
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:21 PM
5

Username checks out
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:56 PM
7

My mum taught me a lot about sex/sexuality, but I guess she was less aware of male-specific things like foreskin. Dad wasn't around so much when I was a kid, and Grandad probably would never talk about such things hahah. School probably didn't teach it, or I wasn't paying attention. Our sex ed was pretty vanilla, and I live in Canada, where we're kind of 50/50 regarding circumcision I think? Lots of American influences here of course, so people are getting circumcised a lot because of that, but …
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:42 AM
2

You weren't mutilated, you were treated for a problem you had, so you are correct in not feeling like you were mutilated.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:29 AM
8

I'm not circumcised, and I tell you what, if I pull back my foreskin and then throw on some underwear and pants and try to move my leg (let alone walk, or God forbid, run!) I am overcome by sensitivity and sort of pain because it is so very sensitize. I mean I'm not on the floor or anything, but it is very discomforting. Yet circumcised dudes walk around like that all day long, they run, they sprint, they play football like THAT. There is no way on Earth that circumcised guys even come anywhere …
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:19 AM
61

Wow, all this time I thought I was super weird and gross and unhygienic when I was a young boy because from age 0 until about 13 or so, I never pulled back my foreskin. When I finally did it was like discovering a whole new part of my body, lol. Jeeze, TIL I was perfectly normal to have had this experience.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:08 AM
-7

That's a pretty funny joke, now make me a sandwich.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:28 PM
0

I don't think using TRT counts as using steroids for the purposes of the picture above. That is doctor prescribed for a legitimate medical condition/concern. If we're counting doctor prescribed steroids here for legit purposes then this number goes up higher than 4-6% for sure, and also becomes completely meaningless. We need to be discussing the number of men using actual anabolic steroids (not creatine or Tribulus/other Testosterone boosters which are legal, pretty ineffective, and far less ha…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:03 PM
3

Eh, I don't count those as steroids, at all. We are talking anabolic steroids here, or we are talking about an issue which is a non-issue in comparison to eating disorders if we're going to start counting in Creatine and Tribulus and protein shakes.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:00 PM
4

Define keep fit though...I'd say maybe, MAYBE 33% of males in modern, western societies engage in at least some minor form of fitness each week, be it a single jog and short weight routine, playing a sport, whatever. Of that 33%, probably only 20% (so 6-7% of the population) are actually really into fitness, go to the gym 4-6x per week, read fitness mags or r/fitness, and are the population group susceptible to steroids abuse. Of this percentage, I could DEFINITELY see at least 20% being into st…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:57 PM
0

Troll...?!
/r/MensRights24/07/15 09:14 PM
5

To be fair, his friends told him they were jealous and that they thought she was hot, but this is a null point as you pointed out quite well. I think for me personally, the 'hotness' of the teacher would have made all the difference to me personally, if I was molested by one whether it would effect me positively or negatively, but on the teacher's side she would be guilty of rape/molestation in either case and is scum in either case. I just probably would have been able to handle it all better i…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:05 PM
15

Which is actually quite a smart move and men should be just as pro-active if they wanna keep their money.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:39 PM
7

OMG tell me this is fake lol.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:55 PM
2

Eh, when I was 22 my ex-girlfriend was 19-20 the year we were together (this was last year). I got my drivers license and a car a few months into our relationship and she followed suit 2-3 months later because we lived an hour away from each other. She usually WANTED to drive if it was both of us going from one parents' house to the others' or if we had to drive around town. The driving and time spent at each other's houses was fairly close to 50/50 and when I was ill for a few months she had no…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:05 AM
9

Hate to break this to you, but humans are animals...
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:17 PM
1

I find it funny how many of us slender people are insecure about being thin. I have gotten and continue to get at times a lot of flack for being under-weight. I'm not even an extreme example at 5'8" and 140lbs male, but people will jump on anything they can find to make you feel insecure and make them feel superior. It is easiest to attack somebody on a physical basis and by being called 'too skinny' really they're saying they can't find anything else wrong with the way you look, so too skinny w…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:10 AM
1

I live in Canada so all pharmacies will sell me that, but I'm not sure she'd like to take it on top of the birth control. Suppose I'll just need to control where I finish better!
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:41 PM
0

Can a vasectomy be reversed? I'm thinking no, right? But for some reason I feel like I can recall knowing of men who had it done, then reversed, done again, etc? I'm only 22 but a vasectomy almost seems logical. I don't want kids and my girlfriend has forgotten to take her pill on days when I've finished inside her...But I don't think I want an irreversible treatment as someday, very unlikely but still a small possibility, I may want a child.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:30 PM
2

How we play taboo, and maybe we are wrong, but the person who has selected the card reads those 5 words, and people need to guess the top word, in this case sexist, based on those 5 words. So those 5 words are all individual words that are meant to help lead you to guess 'sexist'. So, say you hear prejudice and discrimination, you may think racist or whatever, but add in male and the likely hood people will guess something that has to do with gender discrimination, aka sexism, more likely. They …
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:17 AM
3

My doctor recommended it to me last time I saw him (couple of weeks ago), he said it would be off-label and I told him I'd just like to do a bit of research myself first. So far I've done some research on it and it seems perfectly safe, after reading this I'll definitely have him write me a prescription next time I see him in December. EDIT Ooooooooooh, it's my reddit birthday! 1 year! :)
/r/MensRights28/09/11 05:00 PM
6

This is one Men's Rights issue I don't have any quarrels with. I usually would generally agree but see a few flaws in most topics I see here, but hell I subscribe to this sub-reddit for shit like that... The double standard here is abominable and the video this guy did is amazingly well done. Kudos to him!
/r/MensRights23/07/11 01:26 AM
1

Nope, you just come across as a prick. I actually find it incredibly creepy that about 5 people on Reddit have called me out as a drug addict or tweaker or what have you and I haven't even used a stimulant since March 2011, habitually I have not since May 2010. As if this is even APPLICABLE to the debate here at all (or in any of the previous incidents). I don't care about your private life enough to read into your post history, to be perfectly honest.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:44 PM
1

I'm Canadian, generally usually refers to 'more often than not', as far as my use of the word goes. Sorry I'm not a walking dictionary like yourself, mate. Knowing the definition of words (and using meth, for that matter) has nothing to do with your IQ. Maybe if you weren't such a stuck up prick, women generally wouldn't threaten to castrate you. ;)
/r/MensRights10/07/11 01:07 PM
2

"...generally..." Wut?
/r/MensRights10/07/11 12:23 PM
3

Since when does an interest group dictate our laws? Since when do feminists represent the source of truth and justice and a majority view (hell, they don't even represent the majority of women...)? Why are you so beat down by feminists that you must adopt all their beliefs into your own world-view and moral compass? You're actually going to agree with feminists here just to prove a point and try not to be wrong? Sorry buddy, you're fucking wrong and have a very skewed view of reality. Women stil…
/r/MensRights10/07/11 12:14 PM
1

Learn your laws. I just explained what sexual harassment is. It is continued sexual fronts after the victim has already requested it be stopped. I don't care what feminists call it, this is what it is by law. There is nothing harassing about making one sexual front on somebody, in fact it is common in society and perfectly allowed, but once that person makes it clear that they do not want you making sexual fronts, and you continue to do so, it becomes harassment. Learn reading comprehension. I s…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:59 PM
4

You're absolutely right, no idea why you're being downvoted. The man never said, "Cool it, lady, I'm here to win!" Or something like that, which he easily could have said had he truly felt he was being thrown off his game by being embarassed or whatever. Position of power my ass, stop being a pushover and stand up for yourself if you feel uncomfortable. This guy clearly didn't feel that uncomfortable by the comments and most males would have found the flattering so I don't see what the big deal …
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:13 PM
1

Obviously I know this, I'm saying we guys are LUCKY, because if you aren't that good looking you CAN find a decent, if not really hot looking woman (assuming that you are interesting, charming, intelligent, etc.). Sure perhaps we're a little unlucky because if you're a really attractive guy but have nothing interesting to offer beyond that then you're going to find it hard, but I have a feeling those kinds of guys are very few and far between. Sure, a hot woman with nothing else to offer can fin…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 04:09 PM
3

Anybody who is not desperate for love, attention, or pussy knows that they can reject women and have to do it from time to time. Women aren't entitled to good men anymore than men are entitled to good women. If you're below average intelligence/character, you're going to be very lucky to find a woman of exceeding intelligence/character find you attractive. But the same is true the other way around as well. There's also the issue of physical attraction, and in this regard men tend to have the bet…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 04:49 AM
1

Wealth =/= Intelligence. Especially when the 'very' quantifier is added.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 04:44 AM
1

I don't actually agree with you on most of this, but I do have a personal observation my friends and I made about a year ago regarding favouritism of female students, usually by the older male teachers in elementary school (but also most teachers in general). "...women who perform even decently are viewed as competent, because so many women perform poorly. The expectations are lowered for women." It had to do with this. It was my experience that females would often receive praise for work that s…
/r/MensRights03/03/11 05:38 PM
2

Upvoted for saying what I'd like to say, though I fear the circle-jerk that is Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 06:39 PM
2

Because it wouldn't be funny/effective. Men can handle having their face shoved in a plate of food or a can thrown at their head. Women, generally, can't/won't tolerate these things (as we see at the end of the commercial, when the other woman is hurt badly).
/r/MensRights07/02/11 06:34 PM
-1

I kinda get why you were down-voted, but come on. This is a great post, hahaha! I think it just needs to be pointed out that a vast majority of those living on the streets are both addicted to drugs and mentally ill, so they aren't exactly appealing partners for most people. It's usually that or they actually want to live on the streets. Not saying there aren't any homeless who are mentally stable and not addicted to drugs, just that those people are pretty rare and probably only going to be hom…
/r/MensRights25/01/11 01:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter