TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VoxMocks Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by VoxMocks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I assume that OP is referring to things like construction and home repairs, household maintenance (car, plumbing, electrical, etc), gardening, and potentially many forms of administrative tasks (taxes, account management, etc)... Often, I feel that many masculine domestic activities are shrugged off as being men's hobbies, rather than actual chores; which, of course, is far from accurate.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 03:58 AM
1

I don't necessarily have an issue with him wearing a dress, so much as I do with the idea that wearing an item of clothing tailored for a female body is seen by many as "making a statement". It isn't! It is just bad fashion. It's shameful that Vogue would be so ignorant in their choice. Women have, for years, been wearing clothing that (at one time) was predominantly masculine—jeans, hoodies, baseball caps, and suits, for example—and it still looks amazing, along with furthering their freedom of…
/r/MGTOW18/11/20 08:06 PM
7

It infuriates me that saying something like that to a women, nowadays, is so often a lose-lose situation. If you ask them to cross their legs while wearing a skirt, you're a misogynist; but, if you don't and happen to glance down (as many subconsciously would), you're a pervert. Seriously, so many of the people that post in r/askfeminists and r/twoXchromosomes lack any agency in their actions; they're always the victim.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 08:55 PM
0

Your quote from Wikipedia stated that informal language (proto-language) would not have been sufficient to pass down ideas to the next generation. It concluded that such languages would result in ideas 'dying out' after only a short period of time. ​ I countered that such a conclusion underestimates the ability of informal languages (e.g. those based on whistling or simple two-word sentences) and drawing to communicate complex ideas and pass them onto the next generation. Some historians specula…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/20 06:10 PM
1

I appreciate your comments. The world, unfortunately, can be a harsh place at the moment, and, while I do understand that this sub can attract a lot of anger from both those who are taking the pill for the first time and those who reject it, I don't see the point in shooting down anyone's effort to contribute to the discussion that this sub encourages (unless they're doing so at the expense of others). ​ Too often, here, someone will write a well-researched, in-depth post about a topic, new or o…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/20 05:52 PM
3

It's also worth being wary of falling into a common law marriage, depending on where you live. Many countries/states still operate such a law, and it can result in breakups being handled, legally, in much the same way as divorce... Effectively, as a man, you're fucked whether you get married or not. For those unfamiliar with it—and massively oversimplifying—a common law marriage is entered into once you cohabitate with a partner for a period of (usually) two years or longer. It basically comes w…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 02:15 AM
60

If I remember correctly, someone in another thread already tried this... Surprise, surprise, they were banned from the subreddit before anyone could comment.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 01:47 AM
69

Yeah. His lawyers have already released a statement saying they plan to appeal this "perverse and bewildering" ruling. It's also worth remembering that this was only the libel case against The Sun newspaper. Despite what the judge said, this was not a trial to determine whether he abused Amber Heard or vise versa. That case is, if I remember correctly, being tried in LA in the New Year. Sources: https://news.sky.com/story/johnny-depp-v-the-sun-all-the-reaction-to-the-ruling-12121613 https://www.…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 01:45 AM
3

I agree completely with the need to be precise. It just doesn't seem like something that should be as heavily criticised as it has been in the comments of this thread, or in the manner that it has been. I doubt OP is a historian and, given the length and depth of his post, a single imprecise detail can be forgiven... Besides, it is impossible to completely separate written and spoken language. Just look at literature and internet forums to see how much the use of written language can impact spok…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/20 01:29 AM
0

Just theorising here, but I feel like the explanation provided in your quote overlooks the capacity of informal language in communicating ideas to the next generation. Even basic signs, drawings, and sounds with assigned meaning understood by a collective group (e.g. whistling) can convey a great deal of information. While I can't prove it myself, I'd assume that, while language has existed in an informal manner for probably millions of years, the inception of formal written and structured langu…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/20 01:01 AM
2

Just to prove that not everyone is as unreasonable as you seem to assume, I did as you suggested and googled your 'facts'. This is where my search (and prior knowledge as an evolutionary psychologist) led me: I'm pretty sure OP was referring more to the creation of formalised and written languages—which date back to around 3,000 BC in the case of some of the oldest (Sumerian, Sanskrit, Tamil, etc)—rather than the evolution of linguistic communication itself. Assuming that that was OP's intention…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/20 12:42 AM
6

Sadly, that's probably true. The judge that presided over the case, Justice Nicol, is married to a solicitor who specialises in women's employment and equality, and it's been pointed out that he co-authored a legal textbook with a friend of Amber Heard back in 2016 (I'll edit this comment if I can find the source). He's also been the judge on several other controversial cases where the ruling was later overturned on the grounds of judicial negligence. It's ridiculous that he was appointed to suc…
/r/MensRights03/11/20 11:30 PM
2

For anyone interested in the case/ruling, ThatUmbrellaGuy (https://www.youtube.com/c/ThatUmbrellaGuy) has some pretty decent videos analysing the transcripts and evidence from each stage of the trial. Since mainstream media is abysmal when it comes to covering cases like these, it's probably one of the few places you can find thorough coverage.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 11:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter